MICRO-PRINT On your Checks

To eliminate credit card debt, you must understand that the debt is not yours personally. Since you began doing money transactions, you've functioned as a voluntary fiduciary representative for a trust account, paying its bills with your own energy. When you set up your first checking account, you accepted this relationship with the trust the government had set up in your name. You have not had control of this trust because you never claimed it and your parents didn't know.

Notice how the "Money System" maintains the illusion. Look at your checkbook. How did they present your name? ALL CAPS. Odd, isn't it? Try to have them CHANGE that to normal capitalization. They CAN'T do it because their computers won't permit that. Bank staff may not be unaware of why. Do they insist on ALL CAPS because they would like to be very clear and allow no mistakes? A clue to that answer is the line on which you sign your name. It's not a line. It's nearly microscopic words, some of the finest fine print you might ever encounter. It generally says something like "ONLY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE." So you the human being has been given authority to sign the checks of your trust, which is an incorporated entity, a fiction. The checking account is not yours.








You're actually worth more dead (debt) than alive!

The Social Security # on the front of your Social Security Card is assigned to the debtor or straw man, the red number on the back of the card is your exempt priority prepaid account number and is assigned to one of the 12 Federal Reserve Banks, designated by the letter in front of the number. There are 12 letters and 8 numbers after the letter. These letters designate which Federal Reserve district or bank is handling your account, the 8 digit # is your account number, all charge backs should be to this bank and not the Secretary of the Treasury, who in reality is the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico. The office of the Secretary of The Treasury of the United States was done away with in 1926; I have the legislative documentation of this. The International Monetary Fund has replaced the office of the Secretary of the Treasury of the United States, which was or is being chaired by Nicholas Brady. The letters below designate which district or bank is handling your account.







A: Boston / B: New York / C: Philadelphia / D: Cleveland



E: Richmond / F: Atlanta / G: Chicago / H: St.Louis



I: Minneapolis / J: Kansas City / K: Dallas / L: San Francisco



The whole problem and nothing else is that the public and national debt or deficit is not being redeemed on the public side through your exemption on the private side. This is the reason you have run away inflation and wars in the public realms.



The reason wars are fought is to kill or execute people to cancel the debt. You will find out that under Title 12 section 1811 and section 3104 [insurance of deposits] every demand deposit account including checking, savings and credit card accounts are insured under the FDIA [Federal Depository Insurance Act] through the FDIC [Federal Depository Insurance Corporation] Title 12 section 1811 (a).



When they execute the debtor to eliminate the debt, they also collect the insurance money; you are actually worth more dead [debt] than alive. Why do you think the police are so quick to shoot people? This executes or eliminates both the debtor and the debt, in one swift action or execution. This is all Karmic and involves the laws of Karma, which in physics involves the Laws of Cause and Effect. This is also the occult or hidden meaning of the scriptures in regard to salvation and redemption.


BIRTH CERTIFICATES ARE ALSO BANKNOTES



Its time to flip the script and become the Executors of the Estates that have been set up in our names via the Strawman/ALL CAPS NAME!

We can actually help balance the National Debt by "Accepting for Value" all bills and presentments that we are requested to pay- IF THEY ARE PRESENTED IN OUR ALL CAPS NAME. That's right, we can offset all that debt via our TDA's, our Treasury Direct Accounts!

"From now on, when presented with a "claim" (presentment) from government, we will agree with it (this removes the “controversy”) and we will ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE.

By doing this we remove the negative claim against our account and become the "holder in due course" of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn testimony of the presenter of the "claim" (under penalty of perjury) and request the account be properly adjusted.

It's all business, a commercial undertaking, and the basic procedure is not complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to remember a few things, like: this is not a "legal" procedure -we're not playing dog-and-pony.

This is commerce, and we play by the rules of commerce. We accept the "claim," become the holder in due course, and challenge whether or not the presenter of the claim had/has the proper authority (the Order) to make the claim (debit our account) in the first place.

When they cannot produce the Order (they never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly adjusted (the charge, the "claim" goes away).

If they don't adjust the account a request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question were assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim.

Since the claim has been accepted for value and is prepaid, and our TDA account is exempt from levy, the request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid because the information is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or making claims on the account.

If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates and individual tax returns to determine if there is any delinquency.

If we receive no favorable response to the above requests, we will then file a currency report on the amount claimed/assessed against our account and begin the commercial process that will force them to either do what's required or lose everything they own -except for the clothing they are wearing at the time.

This is the power of contracts (commerce) and it should be mentioned, at least this one time, that a contract overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document other than another contract. We should also mention that no process of law -"color" of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc. - can operate upon you, no agent and/or agency of government (including courts) can gain jurisdiction over you, WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT.

You, (we) are not within their fictional commercial venue.

The Accepted For Value process, however, gives us the ability to deal with "them" -through the use of our transmitting utility/go-between, the Strawman -and hold them accountable in their own commercial world, for any action(s) they attempt to take against us.

Without a proper Order, and now we know they're not in possession of such a document, they must leave us alone ... or pay the consequences.

Yes, this process IS powerful.

Yes, it CAN set us free from government oppression and control.

But remember: "What goes around, comes around." "Do unto others, as you have others do unto you."

It's simple, folks, DO NOT ABUSE THIS PROCESS ... if you do it could come around and bite you."-

NEVER CONFESS WHO YOU ARE... DEALING WITH POLICE, JUDGES, ETC.






I. Basis of Action when confronted.
Never walk into the police station or court voluntarily.  If you do you traverse and acknowledge the validity of their jurisdiction/offer.  As Lao-tzu noted 2,500 years ago: “Do not invite the fight, accept it instead.  Better a foot behind than an inch too far ahead.”  Let the offer come to you; don’t make the offer.
When you are confronted with an obligatory court appearance, keep in mind the following:
Everything is commerce/contract, being administered in a state of emergency under the war powers.  The commerce clause of the Constitution operates in the private international law merchant of the bankers to whom essentially every government in the world is bankrupt.  All of this functions in admiralty/maritime where you have no rights and the captain’s word is law.
As a result of the above condition, military war powers enforce all interstate commerce (which is everything), with draconian penalties for impeding commerce.

Because the climate in which we live is a relentless and ravenous assault from all aspects of the “government” against our commercial liability, i.e. “revenue raising,” enforced by guns, violence, and prisons, life in America a high-risk venture. It requires understanding of how to neutralize the endless barrage of attacks in the form of commercial presentments/offers.  Fighting is a no win proposition.  Matters must be neutralized, defused, and transmuted into victory without conflict.

We have no money, only private debt paper, insurance scrip (like Monopoly money or casino chips which a real monopoly has foisted on the world), operating in the bankruptcy.  Everything is commerce, which is banking, which is debt paper, which is credit/debit balances on banks’ books, which is bookkeeping.

Assets (credits) must always equal liabilities (debits).  The books must always balance for world commerce to operate.  The commercial account must be cleared within three (3) days, which is codified in the US in the Federal Truth in Lending Act, Title 12 USC § 1601, “Regulation Z.”

A traffic citation, summons, indictment, complaint, etc., is a commercial presentment.  When the presentment is issued a debt is created, a liability on the bank’s books, which must be balanced with an asset.  They want you to supply the asset in the form of paying a fine, some specific performance, or jail time.
 
Every such commercial presentment is an offer to contract, concerning which you have the following five (5) options:

1. You can deny or fight the charges and thereby traverse, enjoin the action, legitimize their cause of action, and lock yourself in to their jurisdiction.  This is a commercial dishonor.  If you enter a plea, or the judge enters one for you, you have traversed.  The only issue now is the facts (“did you or did you not run the red light?”).  In other words, dishonor submits you to a court proceeding to resolve the dispute over facts of the matter.

2. You can demur.  A demurrer accepts all alleged facts as true and raises of issues of law.  A classic example is: “Yes, I did it, but so what?  The statute of limitations has expired so issues of law foreclose all possibility for me to be prosecuted in this matter.”

3. You can stand mute, in which both the law and facts are invoked.  The judge will enter a plea for you and a court proceeding to resolve the controversy will commence.  Standing mute is also a commercial dishonor and locks you into both law and facts.

4. You can protest, such as by denying jurisdiction.  This also locks you into the requirement to proceed with the court process to resolve the dispute.

5. You can accept the offer/charges (citation, summons, complaint, indictment, etc.) for value.
Of the above options, only # 5:

1. De-fuses, i.e. dissolves, the controversy, thereby obviating all necessity or possibility for court proceedings since there is no dispute to resolve (you have “agreed with your adversary quickly while you are on the way with him”).

2. Makes you the owner of the contract/offer.

3. Makes you the Creditor.  The Creditor is always the winner in court proceedings, all of which have only two (2) classes of participants: Creditors and Debtors.  The Debtor always loses and pays.
After you accept for value and own the contract/offer, the matter is non-negotiable, i.e. private and personal between you and the offerror in his non-official capacity.
Every arrest and incarceration today is seizing the surety on a commercial dishonor.  The commercial accounts must balance for commerce to function.  It is not possible to retain only the debit side of a bank ledger.  The offsetting asset side must be there for the books to balance, the commercial account to clear.  Otherwise, world commerce would collapse into a pile of mush immediately.
When you dishonor a commercial presentment (citation, etc.,) the offerror accepts your dishonor, undertaking a Banker’s Acceptance (BA) and executing a Bill of Exchange.  This Bill of Exchange is for at least 10 times the face amount, and possibly 100 X.  The one who accepts, being the Creditor, is entitled to place whatever value he wishes on the transaction.  The counties run on these bonds.
You must now pay the full amount or the Bill of Exchange, the bond, or the account remains open indefinitely; the case (books) never closes.  If you fail to pay in Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) to balance the books, then you are arrested and incarcerated as the surety, collateral, to raise the funds to balance the ledger.  These funds are raised by borrowing (via your straw man) on the public debt for which you, the real being, are responsible for paying (discharging) if you have not rebutted the rebuttable presumption that the King (Wizard, Bankers, Power Elite, etc.) owns your all capital-letter name.  You have no liability if the books are fully balanced.  Performance on acceptance balances the books.
This is one reason the prisons are so full.  Another reason is that the judges are part owners of the prisons, and make money on everyone they incarcerate.  Prisons are immense money-making operations due to the bonds raised against the straw men (debtors) of the people (collateral) warehoused behind bars.  High dollar amounts are attached to the bonds raised to incarcerate people.  The prison industry is big business, constituting the major industry in California, Texas, and Florida.
If you have a bail bond you can’t proceed until you rid yourself of the bond.  Accept it for value, send it back to the bondsman, register the bond in the Commercial Registry as your secured property.
Never confess who you are.  That is bearing false witness against yourself.  Some people advocate carrying no identification.  If you are arrested, they have two (2) hours to identify you.  If you identify yourself, they are allowed to hold you (provided you don’t sign their paperwork or otherwise traverse) for three (3) days (72 hours).  The general rule is therefore, of course, never tell them who you are (why do their job for them?) or sign anything.
Anything you do except comply, insofar as dealing with the police is concerned, is interfering with a policeman in his line of duty.  What is his duty?  It is revenue collection for the city.
One of three (3) things is needed to identify you:
1. your date of birth (the day your vessel, i.e. body, was birthed into the 14th Amendment Public Charitable “cestui que” Trust as a citizen of the United States, a corporate franchise launched into a voyage in commerce in an ocean of insolvency, i.e. unpayable bankruptcy).
2. your Driver License.
3. your Social Security Number.
Without any of the above three (3) items, their job is difficult to impossible, especially with a two (2) hour time limit.
A judge’s job is to get you to traverse, contest, and dishonor, and thereby make an offer, which the judge can accept, and thereby own.  If you are hauled into court or forced to go under threat, do not offer and do not negotiate.  If you reject, negotiate, or issue a counter-offer, you create a controversy.  You perform a dishonor, which the judge can accept.
Concerning every offer a judge makes to you, accept it for value, with words such as:
1. “Thank you for your offer, which I accept for value.  May I have your name please?”  (You are acknowledging his commercial presentment and wanting to know with whom you are doing business and entering into contract)
Thereafter you must proceed with the remainder of the standard questions and request, i.e.:
2. Do you have a claim against me?
3. Do you know anyone who has a claim against me?
4. I request the order of the court to be released to me immediately.
If the judge says, “I don’t have a claim against you, but I believe that the prosecutor does,” you proceed with the three (3) questions to the prosecutor.  If he says that the State of California, United States, etc., has a claim against you, say:
“I call the State of California to the witness stand.”
When the State of California fails to take the stand to testify and be cross-examined, you can say:
“It appears no one has a claim against me.  I request the Order of the Court to be released to me immediately.”
Remember that when you accept their offer for value, you place the amount on the transaction and they are required to perform and adjust your account.  You are now the Secured Party, i.e. Creditor.  You are the Principal and the Interest goes to you.
II. Proof of Claim.
The fundamental issues must be perpetually kept in mind and actualized.  Namely:
1. The central core of any dispute is who can state the claim upon which relief can be granted.  Whoever can prove his claim wins.
2. One rebuts their rebuttable presumption of holding a claim against you, via presumption of ownership (by your default) of your Birth Certificate and straw man, by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the real you (upper and lower case spelling of your name) as Secured Party and your name in all capital letters as the DEBTOR.  The UCC-1 is the single most irrefutable, unbreakable, bedrock contract in the world today.
3. Without rebutting their rebuttable presumption via filing a UCC-1, their unrebutted presumption stands as the truth in commerce and you have no standing in law.  You are bereft of rights, devoid of standing in law, and completely unable to “state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”  The result is that you are rendered permanent DEBTOR owned by them and concerning which they have carte blanche to deal as they wish.  You are a slave on the master’s slave plantation without capacity to go against your owner.
4. Once filing the UCC-1 you have irrefutable proof of your supreme claim and, if you proceed correctly, win in any proceeding as the acknowledged Creditor in the matter.  Then all would-be claimants lose for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
5. The bottom line is therefore: How do you state your claim upon which relief can be granted in a manner that cannot be ignored by a judge or administrative agency?
6. The catch-22 of the matter is that in law only the original counts, but if you surrender your original of something you no longer have it.  Then if the opposition confiscates it you are devoid of a way to prove your claim and lose.
7. This conundrum is resolved in the following manner:
a. Obtain certified, true copies of your UCC filings in the Commercial Registry that establish your basic claim on your straw man and also any particular matter at hand (citation, indictment, court case, etc.);
b. Take the above-referenced documents (plus a certified, true copy of the court docket sheet—signed, dated, and stamped by the clerk—pertaining to your case, if one exists) to a notary and have two (2) or more notarial acknowledgments of the entire package as a “certified, true copy of the original”;
c. Serve one of the original notary acknowledgments, via process server or means such as Registered Mail with Affidavit of Service executed by a third party, notarized, on the judge, designated as “[Name of Judge—upper and lower case spelling] dba [NAME OF JUDGE], [FULL NAME OF COURT]” if such exists, or the legal department or party/office that receives service of process re an agency.
8. A notary acknowledgment has powerful effects and ramifications: it must be entered as evidence on the record of a court case and a judge must take judicial notice of it.  To achieve either of these results is not always easy.  By proceeding in this manner you have placed before the judge or authorized party on the other side a proof of your supreme claim that must be recognized and cannot be avoided.  In short, you have stated on the record (court or administrative) proof of your “claim upon which relief can be granted.”
A mere copy of the documents otherwise proving your supreme claim not only can be disregarded by a judge or legal department of an agency, it may be mandated to be disregarded (considered hearsay) since only the original counts.  To rely on mere copies may render your situation worse since you have played your hand, i.e. tipped them off, without the clout to back it up.
If you, or someone you know, is in jail, have the central documents pertaining to the case notarially acknowledged and served on the judge with at least a statement to the effect: “Enclosed/attached herewith is a notarially acknowledged, certified true copy of documents substantiating the supreme claim re [Citation, Tax Bill, Complaint, Case, etc.] of [Name of Secured Party].  Either provide proof of claim superior to the claim of Secured Party as evidenced by the enclosed/attached within [time frame you designate] or your failure to prove said superior claim within said time frame constitutes conclusive presumption, fact, i.e. judicial or administrative res judicata, that no such claim exists.  Absent your proof of superior claim Secured Party requests that the account be adjusted and the Order of the court be released to Secured Party immediately.”
Concerning anything you receive in writing from the system, it is a demand on or at least bears on your commercial liability.  A document you receive is almost always a bill, commercial presentment, offer to contract into your paying a debt or engaging in some specific performance.  In short, the system wants something from you.  Otherwise, why would they send you anything?  If it is a notice of discharge of an obligation (e.g. statement marked "paid in full”), it is still a matter concerning which you must establish your superior claim by accepting for value and registering in your UCC on the Commercial Registry.
As a result of the above, the procedure for dealing with essentially any document [e.g. Citation, Tax Bill, Complaint, Case, etc.] you receive is the same:
1. Make copies of the presentment;
2. Keep the original intact, pristine (unmarked on), in a safe place;
3. Stamp a copy with text to the effect: “accepted for value, all related endorsements, front and back, in accordance with House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933”;
4. Sign your name and date the stamped copy, using blue ink;
5. Send the stamped, signed, dated copy back to the sender within ten (10) days of your receipt thereof.
By engaging in the above process you have undertaken a Banker’s Acceptance, become the owner of the contract and entire matter, the holder in due course, Secured Party, and Creditor.  You have “placed the ball in their court” and their only options are to withdraw their offer (cancel the bill/offer) within the 72-hour Regulation Z grace period or thereafter be foreclosed from the option to do so.  They are then stuck with the debt in the amount you unilaterally choose (which must be at least equal to the amount of the bill, and preferably 100 times that amount to cover the bonding).  Their failure to cancel the matter within 3 days is a commercial dishonor and they are on the defensive.
Make the above-described procedure your norm for dealing with all unwanted claims against your commercial liability, whether tax agencies, bill collectors, court judgments, etc.  Remember the central Commercial Maxim: “An unrebutted affidavit, claim, or charge stands as the truth in commerce.”  You must accept for value, and do so within the time frame (10 days) allotted to you in order not to waive your opportunity to do so.



ASSUME THE FOLLOWING



The United States is bankrupt and has been since 1933. The U.S. "went off the gold
standard" in 1933. The U.S. "went of the silver standard" in 1964. Remember? That's
when all the coins were debased for cheaper metals like copper and nickel. Therefore,
the United States has no gold or silver backing for currency and daily operations as
required by the Constitution.
So, what assets are left? So how does the United States finance its daily operations?
The only asset left is the people. In the government's own language, it is called "the
good faith and credit" of the American people. But, what is that "faith and credit" based
on? Look at Senate Resolution #62 above. "ALL PROPERTY BELONGS TO THE
STATE" and you are now a "mere user" of "their property". In their own words; you
allegedly have "so-called ownership" by the (so-called) "virtue" of a Bankrupt
Government? But, how did this take place? Where did the U.S. Government find the
"faith"?
Solution; collateralize people for the "credit" by getting the people to "believe and
have faith".
How? By registering them (all United States Citizens and Americans) into international
commerce, and selling bonds on them. The person becomes the surety on the bonds, or
the "pledge" for the "faith" to build the "credit of the United States". The asset bonded
(the personal collateral) is the "energy" or the future labor of the people which is payable
at some undetermined future date. Thus, the people become the "utility" for the
"transmission" of energy, which is your labor and intellectual property over time.
When a baby is born in the United States, a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau
of Vital Statistics in the state of birth. The keyword here it is "registered"; as in, "gifted
with a certificate" that is given by the parents of the child to the "virtue of the
government", and then registered in international commerce through the DEPARTMENT
OF HUMAN RESOURCES. We are Human Resources [Executive Order 13037
Sec. 2(b)] WILLIAM J. CLINTON Filed with the Office of the Federal Register, 8:45 a.m.,
March 5, 1997
NOTE: Now you know what a "human resource" is. Your energy and intellect are "resourced",
meaning taken from the "source" (i.e. You) and "sourced" to something else
(i.e. The U.S. Government's monetary system of "good faith" (belief) and credit.
The baby becomes the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the Birth
Certificate is registered in the U.S. Department a Commerce, the Department of Treasury
issues a bond on the Birth Certificate and the bond is sold at a SECURITIES
EXCHANGE as a "Derivative" (meaning a derivation on the Name....in ALL CAPITAL
LETTER NAME See Blacks sixth edition dictionary) and bought by the Federal Reserve
Bank through the Deposit Trust Corporation (aka: DTC) at 55 Water Street, in New York
City, about two blocks down the street from the FED. The DTC is a high-rise office
building and the sign out front reads: "The Tower of Power".
You've seen that TOWER, right? Remember the LORD OF THE RINGS and the Energy
Transfer Towers of the MATRIX.
When the Birth Certificate is registered, a separate legal entity is created; a mirror image
of the real flesh and blood. This separate entity, or alter ego is called the "straw man".
Remember the Straw Man with "no brain" in WIZARD OF OZ?
The Straw Man is the “accommodation party” of UCC 3 -- 415. The name is credit. (See
Blacks 6th. “Accommodation party” and "Straw Man"). Therefore the right (or the use)
has been separated from the title (or deed). The “"straw man” holds the title (and "he/it"
belongs to the government's client who bought the bond/title) and the flesh and blood
man has only naked possession with the limited “right” to use the thing (like his body or
his alleged possessions and land, which now becomes “usury” of another title/property).
When the straw-man violates some rule or statute (for instance a traffic ticket), the flesh
and blood man must appear at the arraignment and admit the straw-man's name (credit)
and then "pay it's debt to the society". The “energy” on the surety is due and payable by
the flesh and blood man who is in use of the straw man. The flesh and blood man is the
“offender” through the improper use of the straw-man. An “offender” is on the offensive
team until he screws up and goes on the defensive with the defendant and loses.
This is why civil rights suits get dismissed out-of-court on Civil Rule 12 (B)(6): "failure
to state a claim upon which relief can be granted". The word: "claim" is another word for
"title". So you have "failed to state a "title" upon which relief can be granted". You do
not own the "title" even to our own bodies anymore, and the United States verified this
with SENATE RESOLUTION #62..."All ownership is in the hands of the State" and your
"use" of any property or labor, including your own...."is subordinate to the STATE".
What is the result?
A very sophisticated form of peonage-servitude and the Constitution does not apply
because the government, on all levels, is thrown into international commerce, the law
merchant, now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. [See Public Law 88 -- 244 in
which the U.S. subscribed to private international law. See definition of "goods" under
the UCC at 2 -- 105 (1) and 9-- 105 (1) in which animals, i.e. -- humans and their unborn
offspring, become "goods" sellable in commerce.]
Revelation 18:.....11-17"The traders will cry and carry on because the bottom dropped out
of business, no more market for their goods: gold, silver, precious gems, pearls; fabrics of
fine linen, purple, silk, scarlet; perfumed wood and vessels of ivory, precious woods,
bronze, iron, and marble; cinnamon and spice, incense, myrrh, and frankincense; wine
and oil, flour and wheat; cattle, sheep, horses, and chariots. And slaves—their terrible
traffic in human lives.
So if this scenario is correct, how does one get back the bond that has been sold on the
Birth Certificate? How does one "break the collusion" with a system that one does not
believe in or even really know or understand?

Unsecured Debt Can Be Terminated


Debts can be purged using the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Credit history
can be restored by using the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Creditors can be defended
against with knowledge of simple contract law, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, rules of court and the basis that banks do not loan anything. Debt
collectors can be defended against with the basis that an assignee cannot
establish any contractual nexus to enforce a claim.

Banks are prohibited from loaning. They can’t loan other depositor’s money
because of the matching principle under GAAP. They can’t loan out nor risk any of
their own assets because of Federal Reserve regulations.
In order to accept a credit application or promissory note, the banks must convert
the customer’s note into a check and give it back to him. Only they can do this
because they have a monopoly on negotiable instruments. It is the customer who
creates the currency and funds the line of credit to himself. The customer is the
depositor (creditor). The banks conceal this fact by carrying out what appears to
be a loan approval process for each customer. There is no loan from the bank.
The object in defending yourself against a creditor that has not assigned the
account to a debt collector is to manipulate the creditor into a new agreement
and/or force the account into collections.

The creditor can be sent a notice of final payment with the expectation that the
creditor will not dispute the payment or its terms in writing, thereby accepting it
as payment in full. When the final payment is accepted, and the creditor has
failed to respond or object to the notice of final payment, it makes it very difficult
for them to maintain a claim against the account holder.
In practice, the creditor will call you to ask about late payments. It is prudent to
take a record of the caller’s name, company, mailing address, and phone and fax
numbers, date and time of call, and then request that the caller limit
communications with you only to writing. It is best to disconnect the call after
obtaining this information and then to send a written correspondence making the
same request.



If the calls continue, you can do this again or make a complaint with your state’s
attorney general’s office.
In most cases, the creditor will assign the account to collections. Once this
happens, the third party collection efforts are regulated under the Fair Debt
Collections Practices Act.

The debt can be assigned, but that doesn’t automatically mean that you have a
contract with the new 3rd party debt collector; in fact you don’t as long as you
don’t contract with them by acquiescence.
The third party assignee usually has no agreement with the debtor, so in order to
recover the loss that it chose to incur; it needs the debtor’s consent. This is
usually obtained by deceit, by tricking the debtor into accepting a new obligation.
You can request from them a validation of the purported debt. This they’re not
going to be able to fully respond to – the collector never provided any services or
products, neither is there an automatic obligation for you to pay.
When the collector responds with anything but some written agreement, evidence
of your consent or evidence of consideration (e.g. payment), they have failed to
validate.

Most collectors who receive this request will never pursue the collection.
If the collector persists in ignoring your request for validation, a complaint to the
Federal Trade Commission may be appropriate. Just listing the address for the
FTC on the second notice is likely to get positive results.

Get the full process with form and how to manual included in the Secured Party Creditor Pack..

The Collection Agency for the International Monetary Fund. Meet The IRS

 The IRS is not who you think they are. IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United States Government.

Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources United Nations (U.N.) and the Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management.

In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations.

Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan No. 26)and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according to the Department of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) & 1-6, Sec. 1-10 (7)(c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."

The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 nation pact called the International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for reconstruction and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and its associates are soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.

According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship.

They serve no allegiance to the United States of America. The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank." Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain.

The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank." The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nations foreign creditors.

The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF.


The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."












THE PRISON BOND GAME.



The issuing of bond for profit on prisoners has finally been deciphered. 
It is no wonder that there is a rise in prosecution for non-violent crimes! 
As soon as your social security number hits the system, there is 
someone buying a bond in your name that accrues the longer your ass 
sits in jail. We couldn’t figure out why the incarceration rate was so high 
that the counties couldn’t afford to pay the bill. 


The courts are operating under Statute Law. A “Statute” is defined in 
BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, FOURTH EDITION REVISED as a kind of 
bond or obligation of record, being an abbreviation for “statute 
merchant” or “statute staple.” 

Statute –merchant = is defined as a security for a debt acknowledged 
to be due, entered into before the chief magistrate of some trading 
town, pursuant to the statute 13 Edward I. De Mercatoribus, by which 
not only the body of the debtor might be imprisoned, and his goods 
seized in satisfaction of the debt, but also his lands might be delivered 
to the creditor till out of the rents and profits of them the debt be 
satisfied. 

The Grand Jury Foreman is the Drawer or Maker of the Indictment by 
his signature, the Defendant/Debtor or Straw-man is the Drawee and 
the State is the Payee and the live Man or Woman is the Payor. What 
they are doing in the courtroom is all commercial, and is in conformity 
to 27 CFR 72.11, where it says all Crimes are commercial. What the 
judge and prosecutor are doing in the courtroom is making a 
commercial presentment under section 3-501 (1) “Unless excused 
(section 3-511) presentment is necessary to charge secondary parties as follows”: 
(a) Presentment for acceptance is necessary to charge the drawer and 
endorsers of a draft where the draft so provides, or is payable 
elsewhere than at the residence or place of business of the drawee, or 
its date of payment depends upon such presentment. The holder may 
at his option present for acceptance any other draft payable at a stated 
date; (b) presentment for payment is necessary to charge any endorser; 
(c) in the case of any drawer, the acceptor of a draft payable at a bank 
or the maker of a note payable at a bank, presentment for payment is 
necessary, but failure to make presentment discharges such drawer, 
acceptor or maker only as stated in section 3-502 (1)(B). 
If you don’t accept the charge or presentment you are in dishonor for 
no acceptance under 3-505 of the U.C.C. (c) and 3-501 (2) (a), (b). 
Acceptance is the drawer’s signed engagement to honor the draft as 
presented. It must be written on the draft, and may consist of his 
signature alone. It becomes operative when completed by delivery or 
notification 3-410 of the U.C.C. 

You are the Fiduciary Trustee of the Straw-man which is a cesti que 
UNITED STATES TRUST; in this capacity you have the responsibility to 
discharge all his debts, by operation of law. You are also the principal 
or asset holder on the private side of the accounting ledger; you are 
holding the Exemption necessary to discharge the debt. When they 
monetize debt they have to have a principal, capital and interest is what 
circulates as principal and is called revenue or re-venue. Principal is 
where venue lies. When you are in dishonor they cannot use your 
exemption to pass the debt or charge through your account to obtain a 
discharge, so they sell your dishonor, which has a commercial value of $1,000,000 dollars for each count. When Social Security # is assigned or 
a Blank Bond is issued and when you are imprisoned the Bond is filled 
out. This Bond is called a Bid Bond, Standard Form 24 (REV. 10-98) 
prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) § 53.228(a). This is also called a Prison 
Bond. These are also referred to as Contract Surety Bonds. The First, the 
Bid Bond, provides financial assurance that the bid has been submitted 
in good faith and that the contractor intends to enter into the contract 
at the price bid and provide the required performance and payment 
bonds. The Second, the Performance Bond, protects the obligee from 
financial loss should the contractor fail to perform the contract in 
accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract documents. 
The Third kind of Contract Bond is the Payment Bond which guarantees 
that the contractor will pay certain subcontractor, labor and material 
bills associated with the project. 
On April 9, 2002 (12:18 pm) Lehman Brothers Banking Cartel in New 
York City agreed to provide prison industry leader CCA (Corrections 
Corporation of America) with a new $ 695.0 million senior secured 
credit facility, to be combined with a $150 million notes offering. The 
war on terrorism has created a buzz in the private prison industry. Less 
than three weeks after September 11th, a New York Post story on the 
for-profit private prison industry stated, “America’s new wall of 
homeland security is creating a big demand for cells to hold suspects 
and illegal aliens who might be rounded up.” In order to prosper, prison 
operators need to maintain a steady flow of prisoners and prison 
dollars. 

The Corrections Corporation of America owns most of your prison 
systems and sells its stock and shares on the New York Stock Exchange, 
the major stock holder is the Paine Webber Group.There is also a Prison Realty Trust [PZN], which is a real estate investment trust [REIT] and is 
the world’s largest private sector owner and developer. 
Prisons are nothing but warehouses for the storage of goods and 
chattel under commercial law. The Warden is a Bailee or Warehouseman 
[before the term Admiral was used he was called Custos Maris “Warden 
of the Sea”] [In some ancient records He was called Capitanus 
Maritimarum or “Captain or Tenant in Chief of the Maritime”] who 
receives personal property from another as Bailment. The Bailer is one 
who provides bail as a surety for a criminal defendant’s release. 
When your dishonor is sold within the United States it has a six digit 
accounting # and is called a Cardinal Number, when it is sold at the 
International Level it goes Ordinance or Military and uses a nine digit 
accounting number. This is where AutoTRIS and CUSIP come in. 
AutoTRIS is the Automated Forensic Traces Investigation System and 
was designed in the Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science using a 
graphical toolkit that was developed at Automation Designs & 
Solutions, Inc. for other software products. 

Why is privatizing prisons so appealing to Federal, State, and Local 
governments? As the Nation put it: The selling point was simple: Private 
companies could build and run prisons cheaper that the governments. 
Unfettered American Capitalism would produce a better fetter, saving 
cash-strapped states millions of dollars each year” while simultaneously 
generating huge profits. The Nation explains this miracle would be 
accomplished. “Private prisons receive a guaranteed [per diem] fee for 
each prisoner, regardless of the actual costs. Each dime they don’t 
spend on food or medical care [for prisoners] or on wages and training 
for the guards is a dime they can pocket.” Most guards in public prisons 
belong to the LEOU, which is part of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees AFSCME. I have a pointed question 
for you, why aren’t we as principals on the Private side of the 
accounting cycle using our Exemption Priority to discharge all this 
Public Debt under the Uniform Exemption Act section 3 “Exempt” 
means protected, and “exemption” means protection, from subjection to 
a judicial lien, process, or proceeding to collect a debt. The answer is 
we are all double-minded and do not know who we are in a 
commercial setting. Every individual in Prison is in there, because of 
Commercial Dishonor. 

You can OID any funds that go out of your bank account – and get them back.




IRS works for creditors.  IRS has forms that allow you to be a creditor and acquire funds that are in escrow.  An outstanding balance, for instance, on an American Express card is in escrow.  The funds are there – you just have to tell the IRS with the proper tax filings to access those funds and pay that guy off with them or return those funds to me.

You can OID any funds that go out of your bank account – and get them back.  Acquire escrow funds with a 1099-A.

If you file a 1099-OID as Recipient, those get reported on a 1040 if you want to get the funds returned.  1099-As don’t get reported; neither do OIDs when you’re the Payor.  i1040 is available on the IRS website; it gives line by line instructions for the 1040.

State tax is in an escrow account, so you use a 1099-A to say use those escrow funds to pay this debt – or you could send the obligation to the Treasury with a money order to pay the debt.  Or you can go to the bank; get a pre-approved transaction through Treasury; start a TT&L (Treasury, Tax & Loan) transaction, bond the account and tell the bank to hold the funds in escrow; send a notice to the State taxing agency that the funds are being held in escrow and as soon as they get a 0 balance that the funds will be released to the State taxing agency.  There are many ways that can work; some certainly are more preferred than others.

Act as a creditor in all aspects of life, even and especially spiritually.  Then your potential of creating solutions is infinite.



Whatever you claim back does not get added to the public debt.

Creditors correct all filings and report properly to the IRS.  Debtors are taxed; creditors aren’t.  Creditors don’t take benefits or privileges or exemptions (on a tax form) or deductions; creditors simply get a return of their interest, all of it.  Creditors have 0 exemptions and no filing status.

All judges and attorneys are members of the BAR and work for the Crown – that’s why they have a title of nobility (esquire).  It’s OK to have attorneys because the States lost their sovereignty.  It’s up to the attorneys and judges and the IRS to make sure that the creditors get their stuff.

Get transaction pre-approved through the Treasury and then bring them into the bank.
You can then, at the least, sit on your security interest and then the bank and you are in a stalemate.

California is a trust deed state.  When you buy a house, you fill out a deed of trust (contract, lien) and then there’s the grant deed (title, with only your name on it).  You are the trustor (grantor) of the deed of trust (you created the trust).  You made the title company the trustee and you made the bank the beneficiary.

The only trust that a grantor does not have control over, ultimately, is an irrevocable trust.  A deed of trust is revocable.  You can record a document at the County Recorder reshaping the trust.  Make yourself the beneficiary and someone else (friend) the trustee – here’s the new trust.  They no longer have a security interest in your property.

Now the title company has no authority to sell it.  Still at a standstill but the account is still not closed and you want the accounts closed.  You have the grant deed in your name.  Even after the bank’s interest has been sold, you have to sign a quit-claim deed before they can sell the property.  If you don’t sign a quit-claim deed, they can’t touch the property because you’re the one on the grant deed.


CITATIONS AND OFFERS TO CONTRACT






When a Police Officer issues you a CITATION, he is actually requesting you to CONTRACT with him! He is alleging that you violated a corporate regulation in writing, which you have accepted by signing and thus requires you to respond.
The Police Officer is instructed to explain that your signature is merely an acknowledgment that you received a copy of the CITATION but in actuality, your signature is notification to the Court and Judge that you have accepted or CONSENTED to this offer to CONTRACT, which also grants the Judge CONSENT; PERSONAM and SUBJECT MATTER jurisdiction over you and the case!

You can cancel that CONTRACT however by rescinding your CONSENT. The Federal Truth in Lending Act provides that any party to a CONTRACT may rescind his CONSENT, within three business days of entering into such a CONTRACT. So across the face of the CITATION you should print or type in large print, the following words:
I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT
and
I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS.
Use blue ink [for admiralty] or purple ink [for royalty]. Admiralty is the Court and Royalty represents your Sovereignty. Either way is appropriate. Sign your signature underneath in blue or purple ink and in front of a Notary and under your signature type: Without prejudice, UCC 1-308. This is another way to declare that you may not be held responsible for this Contract pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code.
Serve Cancelled Citation back it on the Clerk / Court, along with a Certificate of Service, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. This kills the CITATION; removes your CONSENT and removes the JURISDICTION of the Court, all at the same time. It really is that simple!
NOTE: A Certificate of Service is a letter that first identifies the Citation and then defines how and when you returned the document to the Court and is signed. If not denied, it becomes a truth in commerce by Tacit Procuration.
Remember to keep a copy of everything, in case the Clerk attempts to trash your response, which certainly will not happen with a Certificate of Service or if it is mailed back by the Notary. The Notary is actually a Deputy Secretary of State and is more powerful than the Court Clerk!
Public Notaries originate from the time of the Egyptian and Roman Scribes who were the purveyors of certified documents, which are sworn affidavits. Certified documents and sworn affidavits are truth in commerce. [e.g.] Birth Certificates are certified documents on bonded paper. The word bonded is derived from bondage as in slavery, which makes all of us Bond Slaves to whoever retains custody of our original Birth Certificates. I bet you believed that the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves and it did for a short time and then the Birth Certificate and the 14th Amendment enslaved us all!

When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces.

As a matter of fact the imagined President, imagined Representatives, imagined Senators, imagined Supreme Court Justices and imagined Federal Judges are not paid by the United States Government. Actually the United States Government does not have any employees They are paid by the International Monetary Fund in electrons. You see there is no such thing as the United States Government. In reality there are no Governments. There are Corporations (Fictions) such as the Federal Reserve Inc., and the United States Inc., which in fact are private corporations. The United States Inc., is just a slave management company. Guess what that makes you? If you said property, you are correct! You are Human Capital. The shares that were issued for the Federal Reserve when it was created back in 1913 only cost $100.00. That was quite the bargain.

To verify the facts in the preceding paragraphs see (5 U.S.C. 903, 12 U.S.C. 95, 18 U.S.C.A. 914, 22 U.S.C. 263, 285, 286, 287, 288. Public Law 89-719, Public Law 94-564, Public Law 101-167, Public Law 91-151 Public Law 103-465, House Report 103-826 T.D.O 150-10, T.D.O. 92, 41 Stat. Chap 214 pg. 654, Emergency Banking Act 48 Stat. 1, Articles of Agreement 60 Stat. 1440, 20 CFR chapter 111, subpart B 422.103 (b) (2) (2), United Nations Secretariat Revised System of National Accounting, Diversified Metal Products v. IRS et al. CV-93-405E-EJE U.S.D.C.D.I., Cromelin v. United States, 177 F.2d 275, 277 Tomalewski v. United States, 493 F.Supp 673, 675 Foster v. Bork, 425 F.Supp 1318, 1319-20 FRC v. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller v. PE 261 U.S. 428, United States v. LePatourel, 571 F2d 405, 410, Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43, INTERPOL Constitution Art. 30, Executive Order 10422, Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493. 42 Pa.C.S.A. 502. General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs.

When you see the documents for yourself, your mind will shatter into a thousand pieces. You will have to acknowledge that your entire life has been nothing but a hallucination. You will have to acknowledge that there is NOT, NOR HAS THERE EVER BEEN A GOVERNMENT, COUNTRIES, MONEY, OR CONSTITUTIONS. All GOVERNMENTS AND COUNTRIES ARE FABRICATED FICTIONS CLEVERLY WOVEN INTO YOUR MIND. They are fictions accepted by you because you have been lied to and poisoned your entire life.. What would you do without an external authority commanding you what to do and what not to do? Would you be lost? Could you govern yourself?
Let’s see how things got this way.

Between the 1860′s and the early 1900′s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts ‘did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction. The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States Corporation.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects (the newly so-called freed slaves from the Civil War) as property of the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United States citizens that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy first positioned in the District of Columbia. The American people, in the republic to be found in the several States, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the privilege to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th Amendment. These new citizen subjects were required to apply for marriage, registered to vote, register births, deaths, etc. It all required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and responsibilities and liabilities, that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people.

(1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts by the British Crown, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.
In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was  sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and it’s States (administrative units), but it only applies to their subjects.

In the 1920′s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies as first required upon the new federal property – the so-called freed Black slaves. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.
In the 1930′s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration (surrender of ownership) of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust, which turned the land over to the State. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.




The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration (surrender) of property through United States agencies, including the ‘State’ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations. All of this was done without full disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration. Is that fraud? The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.
If a remedy was available, and the people chose not to or failed to use the remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a very long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations, added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public ‘socialist media’ was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to be lost in the millions of pages of the books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people knew there was something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the government schools. How’ can the American people be free and subject to a de-facto government’s whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
“Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…”
HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was poisoned by the powers that be by agents of that federal corporation.

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is used to discharge public debts. Take note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no value, as stated by the Federal Reserve!

In the 1950′s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to their States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security instruments (commercial paper) replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was disappearing, and NEW money was being created i.e., ‘Money of Account’ (created by Bill of Exchange) and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance (see ‘Tender of Payment in your State statute!). All this was accomplished by the mid 1960′s. And by 1964, most all the States had adopted the Uniform Commercial Code.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900′s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children, etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under dictate by the United States, gained control of the substance through the ‘registrations’ and the States were able to extract more ‘use’ taxes, from the people to use the property of the State! The States and the United States became the Holder of the titles to all the property, even children and many other things.

The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the ‘things.’ That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an impossibility!

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a ‘constructive’ trust for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person (Debtor-straw-man) by the United States.

If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt is what is owed to the owners of the registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors!

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor’s- liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns or owes.

Debtors may have the ‘use’ of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for  every mistake the people make, when trying to use their remedy.

Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing), after learning the law and discovering who he is in relation to the United States Corporation, can file a UCC Financing Statement based upon a Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the artificial entity DEBTOR/PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United States created after your Mom signed the ‘Root of Title/Newborn Identification’ and then was compelled to apply for a birth certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of ____. The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter – JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).

The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill of Exchange with the Secretary through which he ‘charges up the UCC Contract Trust Account,’ in respect to the ‘value’ expressed on the Birth Certificate and the ‘Directive’ cover letter. The social security number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a chargeback, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge.

Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill, utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $ amount and JOHN’S name on it as the presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge JOHN and put JOHN’S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as the secured party creditor, having charged up the UCC Contract Trust Account, now for the ‘presentment’ received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or debt with a negotiable instrument for the same $ amount as the charging instrument (presentment) stipulates. The charging party that receives your non-cash item can process it back through the United States Treasury through their financial institution. Note; if discharging IRS Tax liability, the package/instrument goes directly to the Secretary of Treasury – U.S.

When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of the thing, but the United States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not specifically authorize the United States/State and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder. Legally, all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud. If the scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason IF they had not provided a remedy, which they did. — House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933. This is their insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge of treason. But Tort, now that’s another matter! We will discuss Tort Claims later!