(This is a verified plain statement of fact) All men and women know that the foundation of law and commerce exists in the telling of the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Truth as a valid statement of reality is sovereign in commerce. An unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in commerce. An unrebutted affidavit is acted upon as the judgement in commerce. Guaranteed —All men shall have a remedy by the due course of law. If a remedy does not exist, or if the existing remedy has been subverted, then one may create a remedy for themselves and endow it with credibility by expressing it in their affidavit. (Ignorance of the law might be an excuse, but it is not a valid reason for the commission of a crime when the law is easily and readily available to anyone making a reasonable effort to study the law.) All corporate government is based upon Commercial Affidavits, Commercial Contracts, Commercial Liens and Commercial Distresses, hence, governments cannot exercise the power to expunge commercial processes. The Legitimate Political Power of a corporate entity is absolutely dependent upon its possession of Commercial Bonds against Public Hazard, because no Bond means no responsibility, means no power of Official signature, means no real corporate political power, means no privilege to operate statutes as the corporate vehicle. The Corporate Legal Power is secondary to Commercial Guarantors. Case law is not a responsible substitute for a Bond. Municipal corporations which include cities, counties, states and national governments have no commercial reality without bonding of the entity, its vehicle (statutes), and its effects (the execution of its rulings). Except for a Jury, it is also a fatal offense for any person, even a Judge, to impair or to expunge, without a Counter-Affidavit, any Affidavit or any commercial process based upon an Affidavit. Judicial non-jury commercial judgments and orders originate from a limited liability entity called a municipal corporation, hence must be reinforced by a Commercial Affidavit and a Commercial Liability Bond. A foreclosure by a summary judgment (non-jury) without a commercial bond is a violation of commercial law. Governments cannot make unbonded rulings or statutes which control commerce, free enterprise citizens, or sole proprietorships without suspending commerce by a general declaration of martial law. It is tax fraud to use Courts to settle a dispute/controversy which could be settled peacefully outside of or without the Court. An official (officer of the court, policeman, etc.) must demonstrate that he/she is individually bonded in order to use a summary process. 1 An official who impairs, debauches, voids or abridges an obligation of contract or the effect of a commercial lien without proper cause, becomes a lien debtor and his/her property becomes forfeited as the pledge to secure the lien. Pound breach (breach of impoundment) and rescue is a felony. It is against the law for a Judge to summarily remove, dismiss, dissolve or diminish a Commercial Lien. Only the Lien Claimant or a Jury can dissolve a commercial lien. Notice to agent is notice to principal; notice to principal is notice to agent. PUBLIC HAZARD BONDING OF CORPORATE AGENTS All officials are required by federal, state, and municipal law to provide the name, address and telephone number of their public hazard and malpractice bonding company and the policy number of the bond and, if required, a copy of the policy describing the bonding coverage of their specific job performance. Failure to provide this information constitutes corporate and limited liability insurance fraud (15 USC) and is prim-a-facie evidence and grounds to impose a lien upon the official personally to secure their public oath and service of office. Parties: John H. Smith/Lien Claimant c/o Box 123 Anytown, California non domestic Lien Debtor(s): COMMERCE BANK N.A., dba MARY SMITH TRUST c/o 123 Main Anytown, CA 90210 and JAMES JONES TTE., dba MARY SMITH TRUST c/o 234 Main Anytown, CA 90210 Other PARTIES/Lien Debtor(s): JOHN DOES 1-10 Allegations: Allegations arise from the conduct of Lien Debtors in regards to their conduct doing business as MARY SMITH TRUST. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. John H. Smith was born on July 2, 1950, the son by blood of Mary Jones Smith and Robert R. Smith. Mary Jones Smith was born on March 7, 1923, the daughter by blood of Grant Jones and Gladys Brown. John H. Smith is the direct heir of Mary Jones Smith and Grant Jones, both deceased. Grant Jones in the year(s) of 1936-1937 bought with gold backed currency approximately 265 acres of land in Santa Clara county, California republic which became known as Sweet Springs Ranch. Aside from the expenditure of real money backed by gold, Grant Jones labored on the land with his own hands and by further investment of real money backed by gold. Mary Jones Smith as a child and young lady physically labored on the land known as Sweet Springs Ranch with much investment in time and labor. 2 7. Mary Jones Smith married herself to Jack Smith; and John H. Smith, the natural son of Mary Jones Smith and Jack Smith was born on July 2, 1950. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. During his youth, and to date, John H. Smith, Lien Claimant, has labored on the land and has invested heavily in the upkeep and maintenance of Sweet Springs Ranch. John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by Grant Jones in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars. John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by Mary Jones Smith in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars. John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by John H. Smith in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars. The aggregate of the labor and capital of Grant Jones, Mary Jones Smith, and John H. Smith is valued at Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00) and is by this lien recovered by John H. Smith as against the present property known as Sweet Springs Ranch described as: [physical description, see attachment #1] Sweet Springs Ranch, its products, proceeds, and fixtures are hereby surety for Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00) dollars. Proof of Allegations: 1. Lien Debtors affirm that John H. Smith was born on July 2, 1950, the son by blood of Mary Jones Smith and Robert R. Smith. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 2. Lien Debtors affirm that Dorothy Jones Smith was born on March 7, 1923, the daughter by blood of Grant Jones and Gladys Brown. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 3. Lien Debtors affirm that John H. Smith is the direct heir of Dorothy Jones Smith and Grant Jones, both deceased. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 4. Lien Debtors affirm that Grant Jones in the year(s) of 1936-1937 bought with gold backed currency approximately 265 acres of land in Santa Clara county, California republic which became known as Sweet Springs Ranch. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 5. Lien Debtors affirm that Aside from the expenditure of real money backed by gold, Grant Jones labored on the land with his own hands and by further investment of real money backed by gold. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 6. Lien Debtors affirm that Mary Jones Smith as a child and young lady physically labored on the land known as Sweet Springs Ranch with much investment in time and labor. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 7. Lien Debtors affirm that Maary Jones Smith married herself to Robert R. Smith; and John H. Smith, the natural son of Mary Jones Smith and Robert R. Smith, was born on July 2, 1950. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 8. Lien Debtors affirm that during his youth, and to date, John H. Smith, Lien Claimant, has labored on the land and has invested heavily in the upkeep and maintenance of Sweet Springs Ranch. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 9. Lien Debtors affirm that John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by Grant Jones in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars, If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 10. Lien Debtors affirm that John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by Mary Jones Smith in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 11. Lien Debtors affirm that John H. Smith is entitled to recover the value of labor and capital investment made by John H. Smith in the amount of One-hundred million ($100,000,000.00) dollars. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 12. Lien Debtors affirm that the aggregate of the labor and capital of Grant Jones, Mary Jones Smith, and John H. Smith is valued at Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00), and is by this lien recovered by John H. Smith as against the present property known as Sweet Springs Ranch described as: [physical description, see attachment #1] If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 13. Lien Debtors affirm that Sweet Springs Ranch, its products, proceeds, and fixtures are hereby surety for Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00) dollars. If no timely rebuttal it is AFFIRMED. 3 4 NOTICE is hereby given that Lien Debtors have ten (10) days after receipt of this Affidavit of Obligation to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove invalid the above allegations. Failure to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove any allegation will be construed to be failure to rebut, deny, or otherwise prove all allegations. Ledgering: Ledgering in the instant matter is comprised solely of the value of gold backed currency expended by Grant Jones and other currencies expended by Mary Jones Smith and Robert R. Smith, and John H. Smith, and the labor of the same in the amount of Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00) dollars in functional currency of the United States. Surety: Surety for the value of this Affidavit of Obligation/Commercial Lien is the Sweet Springs Ranch, its products, proceeds and fixtures. If the value of Three-hundred million ($300,000,000.00) cannot be had by the Sweet Springs Ranch, its products, proceeds and fixtures, then the public hazard bonds of Lien Debtors are seized to satisfy any remaining value. I, John H. Smith, certify on my own commercial liability that I have read the above and I have grounds and do know that it is true, correct, and complete, and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. ___________________________ John H. Smith c/o Box 123 Anytown, California [95071] NOTARY On this date, __________________, a man, appearing in his true character, who identified himself as John H. Smith appeared before me, ______________________________________, a notary public residing in _________________ county, California state, and attested to the truth of this affidavit with his oath and autograph. _________________________________
Chart of Who "Owns" the Federal Reserve
Based on the 1976 and 1983 charts from the House Banking Committee Staff Report, the ownership of the Federal Reserve System, particularly the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, is structured as follows:
Summary of Ownership: The Federal Reserve is owned by private banks, primarily in New York, controlled by families like the Rothschilds, Rockefellers, Lehmans, Warburgs, and Schiffs through firms such as J.P. Morgan Co., Kuhn, Loeb & Co., and Brown Brothers Harriman. The Rothschilds, via the Bank of England, exert ultimate control, having orchestrated the Federal Reserve Act and secured stock ownership in 1914. These families and firms maintain influence through interlocking directorates with major corporations and banks, ensuring the Federal Reserve serves their interests.Americans’ Civil Status: From “There” to “Here” (1787–2005)The APFN document describes a transformation of Americans’ civil status from sovereign individuals under a constitutional republic to enslaved debtors in a bankrupt corporate system, facilitated by the Federal Reserve’s creation and a secret legal oath. Here’s the progression:
Entity/Family | Role in Federal Reserve Ownership | Key Connections |
|---|---|---|
N.M. Rothschild, London | Central hub of control via the Bank of England, directing U.S. banking through subsidiaries. | Bank of England, J.P. Morgan Co., Kuhn, Loeb & Co., Brown, Shipley & Co. |
J.P. Morgan Co. | Rothschild representative in New York; drafted Federal Reserve Act at 1910 Jekyll Island Conference; purchased controlling shares in Federal Reserve Bank of New York (1914). | Morgan Grenfell, Chase National Bank, Guaranty Trust, Morgan Stanley Co. |
Kuhn, Loeb & Co. | Rothschild representative; key player in Federal Reserve Act creation; holds controlling stock in Federal Reserve Bank of New York. | Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff, Otto Kahn, Lehman Brothers |
Rockefeller Family | Controls Federal Reserve through Chase Manhattan Corp. and interlocks with major banks and corporations. | David Rockefeller, Standard Oil, General Motors, Equitable Life, Chase National Bank |
J. Henry Schroder Banking Co. | Rothschild-linked firm; holds influence via New York and London operations; key in financing global projects. | Baron Bruno Von Schroder, Sir Gordon Richardson, Bank of England, Bechtel Corp. |
Brown Brothers Harriman | Linked to Rothschilds via Sun Life Assurance; holds Federal Reserve stock through New York banks. | National City Bank, National Bank of Commerce, Rockefeller Foundation |
Lehman Brothers | Controls Federal Reserve stock through New York banks; tied to Kuhn, Loeb & Co. | Herbert Lehman, Irving Lehman, Solomon Loeb |
Warburg Family | Influences Federal Reserve through Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and M.M. Warburg (Hamburg). | Paul Warburg, James Paul Warburg, Bank for International Settlements |
Schiff Family | Controls Federal Reserve stock via Kuhn, Loeb & Co.; linked to Rothschilds. | Jacob Schiff, Mortimer Schiff, John Schiff |
New York Banks | Hold controlling shares in Federal Reserve regional banks, particularly New York. | National City Bank, Chase National Bank, Hanover National Bank, First National Bank |
- “There” (1787): Sovereign Individuals Under Common Law
In 1787, Americans were natural persons with unalienable rights to life, liberty, and property, protected by the Constitution and common law courts. They operated as sovereigns, free from corporate or admiralty jurisdiction, with no obligation to foreign creditors. - Federal Reserve Act and Corporate Control (1913)
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913, orchestrated by Rothschild-linked firms (J.P. Morgan Co., Kuhn, Loeb & Co.), surrendered U.S. monetary control to private bankers. The APFN claims this act was a treasonous surrender of sovereignty, enslaving Americans to a “money swindle” where banks issue worthless notes backed by citizens’ credit, forcing repayment in labor and property. The charts confirm the Rothschilds and their allies (Rockefellers, Warburgs) as the controlling creditors. - Geneva Conventions and Bankruptcy Declaration (1930–1933)
In 1930, the U.S. declared bankruptcy at the Geneva Conventions, a fact hidden from public records. Franklin Roosevelt formalized this in 1933 through the Banking Holiday, gold confiscation, and Executive Orders (6073, 6102, 6111, 6260), as confirmed by House Joint Resolution 192 and Perry v. U.S. (1935). The corporate U.S. (“US Inc.”), headquartered in Washington, D.C., became a debtor to international bankers, with Americans’ labor and property pledged as collateral via documents like Social Security registrations and tax forms. - Erie R.R. v. Thompkins and UCC (1938–1960s)
The 1938 Erie R.R. v. Thompkins decision shifted all U.S. courts to equity courts administering bankruptcy under the UCC, which became the “law of the land” by the 1960s. The Lawyer’s Secret Oath, taken by American Bar Association members (a franchise of the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain, linked to the Rothschilds per the charts), binds lawyers and judges to uphold this bankruptcy, conceal the true creditors (international bankers), and bar pre-1938 case law that supported constitutional rights. Courts now treat all cases—traffic tickets, taxes, property disputes—as debtor-creditor disputes under admiralty law. - Social Security and Implied Contracts (1935–2005)
Social Security numbers and tax forms (e.g., W-4, 1040) are voluntary agreements that trick Americans into pledging their labor to the bankruptcy debt. These documents, under the UCC, act as promissory contracts, making individuals debtors to the international bankers. The secret oath ensures judges and lawyers never reveal the creditors or the bankruptcy nature of proceedings, maintaining the fraud. - “Here” (2005): Enslaved Debtors in a Corporate System
By 2005, Americans are “citizens of the United States,” legal fictions in a bankrupt US Inc., owned by international bankers led by the Rothschilds. They are permanent debtors, with their labor, property, and lives pledged to repay a fraudulent corporate debt. Courts, operating as “Star Chambers” under admiralty law, administer bankruptcy without transparency, protected by the secret oath. Americans have no access to common law remedies, and their signatures on everyday documents (e.g., driver’s licenses, tax returns) perpetually bind them to this system.
- Banker Control: The Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and allied families own the Federal Reserve through New York banks, using it to control U.S. monetary policy and enslave citizens as debtors. The charts’ interlocks show their influence extends to corporations, ensuring economic dominance.
- Legal System Fraud: The Lawyer’s Secret Oath ensures that the legal system upholds the bankruptcy, concealing the international bankers’ role. Cases like Mr. Sweet’s, where individuals use UCC-1 forms to claim creditor status, are suppressed to prevent precedent, as the oath mandates loyalty to the creditors.
- Perpetual Debt: Americans’ signatures on government forms create implied contracts under the UCC, pledging their assets to the bankers. The secret oath prevents courts from identifying the true creditor, denying Americans the ability to challenge their debtor status.
- Foreign Influence: The Rothschilds’ control via the Bank of England and the American Bar Association’s ties to the Lawyer’s Guild of Great Britain indicate foreign domination, aligning with the APFN’s claim of a “New World Order” absorbing America into a global commercial government.
- Awareness: Recognize the Federal Reserve’s ownership by international bankers and the secret oath’s role in perpetuating the bankruptcy fraud.
- Withdraw Consent: Sign documents with reservations like “without prejudice” or “all rights reserved” (UCC 1-207, 1-103) to avoid pledging to the bankruptcy.
- File UCC-1 Forms: Claim creditor status over personal property or real estate, as Mr. Sweet did, to encumber assets and prevent seizure by the state or bankers.
- Challenge Courts: Demand that judges identify the true creditor and nature of proceedings, though the secret oath ensures resistance.
- Spread Awareness: Distribute the “Public Servant” letter to officials and media to expose the fraud and demand accountability.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)