Ever heard the statement: "The constitution has NO place in the courts and your life?" When one argues a "Costitutional" position whether in the courts or society that position will NOT prevail. Why? We grew up with the concept of personal freedom and constitutional rights. Yet, even to the most causual observer America is NOT free. The Constitution is NOT in effect in the courts of this land. Ask any judge, he will quickly tell you the constitution is not permitted in his courtroom.
Every company, corporate entity or any organization is governed by a charter, by-laws, or some sort of 'constitution' that will legally dictate and control the operation. Ever stop to consider that if the Constitution is NOT the charter for the Federal government and society what is the "law" of that society?
Then what is the law and 'constitution' of the federal government and society in which we live? The Uniform Commercial Code! If you think that is a stretch of the of the imagination study through the contents of this web site. You will come to a legal understanding of how/why you have become a slave to the society (democracy) around you. Then you will understand how to regain your freedom and 'constitutional' rights.
The only thing prohibiting your freedom is legal awareness and lack of information. ALL; i.e., EVERY thing or action you do is 'commercial'. You can NOT function except through a 'commercial contract'. It is well established that a legal fiction (corporation, government, etc) cannot directly approach a 'private' individual. When government, court, tax, and corporate agents approach you in person, via the mail, over the phone, etc., they are soliciting your consent for "voluntarily" entering into a commercial contract and "doing business." The controlling law for these contracts is the Uniform Commercial Code.
All governments are corporate, for-profit operations. The U.S. [federal] Government and its administrative agencies bring suits against people and other government entities every day. In the legal system there is no difference between civil and criminal jurisdictions; each is commercial. All crime (including murder) is commercial, i.e. has a monetary value affixed thereto. 27 CFR 72.11 spells this out in unequivocal terms. Nowadays it is common for both artificial and flesh-and-blood entities to settle criminal charges out of court, i.e. via payment. [Note: committing a crime is a physical impossibility for an artificial person/corporation, but such are charged criminally almost every day.]
The Uniform Commercial Code at Article 1, §103 it states:
§ 1-103. Supplementary General Principles of Law Applicable.
Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this Act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, Bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions.
What they're telling us is that all other law - common, constitutional, equity, bankruptcy, etc. - is only supplemental to the supreme law of the land - the Uniform Commercial Code. If we don't proceed on the basis upon which they proceed, then we will lose due to failure to procedure, not substance.
A little more.
The information here is compiled right from the UCC Code. Right from the latest changes, and from some of the most powerful codes this planet has ever seen; And I mean planet! In order to understand what it is that we actually do, I need to go back and explain why we're doing what we're doing.
The whole thing started obviously when we had 13 signers to an Original Declaration of Independence. That was an underlying contract that was signed by thirteen different leaders that said "No more." "We are done, we are independent from you. We are going to do our own thing." And that contract led up to another one which is known as the Constitution and another The Bill of Rights etc., etc. etc.. the Articles of the Confederation.
These contracts were what formed a nation here over 200 hundred years ago. It was formed under contract and Sub-formed under codes, rules and regulations. In 1871 the United States set up a system that was called the District of Columbia Organic Act. At that point in time there was only a government and a people, individually based upon the contracts that were written almost a hundred years prior to The Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, etc. etc.. This new act, called the District of Columbia Organic Act created the first Corporate Government that the United States of America has ever seen, and it created a new wild beast that most people don't see. Because it's Corporate America, it has everything to do with commerce; it's under Contract Law. Shortly thereafter, they created what is known as the Bureau of Vital Statistics. The Bureau of Vital Statistics is what formed a birth certificate / chattel paper. This birth certificate was the first time that the United States ever seen a Corporate person known as a Dummy, a strawman, a juristic person or any other kind of fictitious corporation that you can put in your mind and just think about, is a fiction, third party front, a dummy. It is not you, it is a word that reflects chattel paper. It's a contract.
These contracts enabled the Corporate United States to contract with a Corporate U.S. I've heard many people, attended many different seminars, I've read a lot of different information and I've talked to a lot of people who use the UCC. And the UCC is a contract. But, what people have to understand is how they incorporated themselves. They see that one of the biggest problems with some of past or even present information that's out there is a lot of people want to go back to the law. Well, under these contracts that we're speaking of, you became a surety. The surety was responsible to pay for all this Corporation's new existence such as the Federal Reserve, such as the IRS, such as the Social Security Administration. I hope that everyone out there understands why this corporation is starting to exist and how it came about and how they get to us. They don't deal with us, they deal with our Dummies/Strawmans. The fictional you. Your Driver's license, your social security card, most all bills that you get, most anything you get will have your Strawmans name, it's Your name in all capital letters. It is a created US citizen you, Not the Real flesh and blood you. It is your front.
When they started to contract and they switched over our gold, which was in 1933, they took all of our gold and they started using a paper currency. Which is a Federal Reserve note, the dollar bills that we carry around. When they created that new little creature the Corporate America was free to use as much of this paper currency it wanted to. It didn't have to use the gold and silver so it could just exchange promises from one hand to another. Again, all of this you have to sit back and understand that a Corporation is coming after you. Not Mr. General Motors, general motors the nobody. It is just a fiction.
The information that we've gotten and use is compiled from many, many, many years of research, study, trial, and a lot of errors because people can't understand the whole concept behind it, which I couldn't either. I didn't even grasp that at one point in my life. The information that we're going to give you is how to protect yourself, how to make yourself secure from liens, levies, and judgments. How to be able to look at yourself, your spouse and kids and say "I'm free". "Let me do whatever I want to do and I'll be a responsible person and I'll just do it". And it really will change your life forever. Because you will be able to stand there and say "No thank you, I do not want to do business with you." It really is that simple once you understand the concept.
Our concept is not going into court. A lot of people have to, a lot of people wait until the last minute to decide that they have to do something and then they're normally caught in a "fire drill" and that's a lot of times when mistakes are made, because it's so fast, we call this a fire drill. So we're trying to recommend to everybody out there to get your hands on something ahead of time. Do something well in advance before you have a problem and that way you're pretty much protected. And the reason I say that is not to say that "Well, if I start doing this paperwork, am I going to draw attention?" No, the point I am trying to make here is that the percentages of people who have some form of issue, whether it be by a local official, a state official, federal official, your county commissioner, your tax guy, the local cop down on the corner by Dunkin Donuts, everywhere you turn they're asking for money. The bottom line is, you get a speeding ticket, they're asking you for money. Then they want your tax line, you turn here, and they take it out of your paycheck. You turn back this way and they slap you in jail and then take more of it. Then they come take your house. Problems happen to people all the time. If you look at it, the percentage of people that have some form of issue, with any of those agencies is extremely high. And it will probably happen to you sooner or later.
So, what our program does is give you the knowledge and it give you the opinion, education to be able to stop living a life like that and just say, "I want to live my own life." "I don't care about that person there, I care about me and me wants to be free."
That's the way we look at it and I know a lot of other people do too.
The new article 9 provisions inside of this UCC just revolutionized a lot of things and that's what we base our information on. Our information is accurate, up to date and it works. Because if you look inside the Bill of Rights, most people know we got them, but most people don't understand what the two sections are. You have to stand back and look at the overlying contract. Article One through Five are constitutional safeguards. It's says we have the right to speak, we have the right to keep our guns, we have the right. That's the first Five. Well the last Five are against our elected officials saying, "You can't do this, and you can't do that." Well, why is it we can't drive down the road without getting pulled over, asking for money? Because we have contracted our entire lives away and didn't even realize it. We contracted for a house, we contracted for a car, we contracted for a credit card, we contract for everything. You're still a Sovereign human being. You just have to un-contract all the small implied adhesion contracts that you're attached to by your own signature (signature: "the act of putting one's name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity." Black's Law Dict., 6th Ed.; autograph: "one's handwriting; written with one's own hand." ibid.)
So what the UCC does is it actually goes in, it allows you to take those contracts and regain Ownership of those listed properties. Once you have regained control, you can stand up and say, "This is my contract. I don't agree or consent."
The consent thing is a large one. It's something that has worked in all levels; it works everywhere because it is The Law. I'd like to repeat that because it is The Law. When you're looking at a consensual encounter, the first that happens when you get pulled over for instance, what happens to you? What do they do to you? What's the first thing they ask you for? "Can I see your drivers license, registration or can I see your papers?" They are asking you to voluntarily o give them some papers so that they can prosecute you. Why? Because they have the contract and they can do that. You signed that driver's license, you didn't know it, but you signed all your rights away. You didn't even know it.
From the Fourth amendment is where we get this "consent thing." And your Fourth amendment is probably the most powerful amendment, powerful law, and powerful set of words in Law that I can think of. If you have anything that you would like to study on, outside of our website, it should be the Fourth amendment. (Brown vs. TEXAS)
Consent. I do not agree or consent. What they are doing to you is that "They" as a corporation are coming up to you as a corporation and asking you to contract with them. They have no evidence that you are anything but that fiction. "I'm sorry, I don't want to do business with you." And the information works because of the way that the code is set up, it enables you to make claims on your property. That's what the UCC is, so many people that I talk to in the past have said, "You file your UCC and your problems will go away." That is so far from the truth. I don't even want to comment any further than that.
A UCC-1 is an asset protector and it allows you to register property that you are making a claim upon. That is what it is. If there is no claim, you can't claim back on it. So right now, up until this point if you're new to this, you didn't understand any of what we just said, but it's starting to become clear to you now as though it's a corporation against a corporation and you have to step back behind the scene there and realize that the IRS, the State of Michigan, the United States, are all fictions coming after you. They don't exist. You can't call Mr. IRS to the stand in a court room. He won't show up. We've been looking for him for years. We can't find him. We've been looking for another guy called Society, for quite some time, but we can't find him either. They don't exist. So, if they don't exist, then they can't make the claim on the property. You can though. Once you make your claim, You got a claim in there. If anyone was to try to infiltrate your property, NOW you have stated a claim, under which release can be granted to you. You now hold a Superior claim. In the format that we're using this information goes directly at the individuals so to speak, not the IRS, but the agent working for them. The fiction does not exist, only the agents that are "moving" the fiction. What we have to offer is the information that goes to them. It informs them, it lets them know, "I have a claim, please provide me with superior claim if you want me to perform/pay." They do not have it.
A synopsis: There is a corporate government and a real government and they have created a fictional you, which is known as a strawman. And this corporate government is doing just what McDonald's is doing when you pull up to McDonald's. "May I help you?" "Sure, I'll take that, that and that." "OK, that will cost you $5.68". They are conducting business with you. And you have the right to decide whether you want to conduct business with with them. You can do so with whomever you wish to. If you don't wish to do business with somebody, you don't have to. No one can force you to. It is the same concept. It's just we set our groundwork and do our claim ahead of time. We're learning to conduct our commercial affairs for our protection and benefit rather than for the quasi-government's advantage, or any other person's or corporation's benefit.
Filing a UCC-1, [is done thru a FCUSA exclusive online process and NOT filed with the Secretary of State. This keeps the control with you via your agent FCUSA. When you file with the SOS, they keep the ORIGINAL papers and thus retain control of your documents to do as they please not as you please.] The sooner we learn, the more capable we become in protecting ourselves, our families, our property, and our interests. Welcome to the real world! You are coming out of the "reel" world of the "Wizard of Oz" and "Alice in Wonderland.
Once you file your UCC1 "correctly" [GL process] you can begin an Administrative Remedy (AR). An AR is based on Admiralty Law which goes way back and consists of a series of 8 letters which is sent to the CEO of the lending institution that your mortgage [debt; aka credit card, student loan, auto loan, IRS] was filed with. Each of the letters must be noterized prior to being sent and is very precise in wording and content. Basically you first must determine who you wish to file an AR against. This can be any creditor or any lending institution, who committed fraud by obtaining funds, based on the use of your Straw man on the international market. These lending institutions are a legitimate source for an AR.
[In the case of a mortgage, auto loan or student loan, you will need the amount paid to the bank to date (principle, interest and late fees). This is your claim amount.
[In the case of a credit card or line of credit, simply use the highest credit limit given you regardless of balance or amount paid. This is your claim amount.
[The total claim amount for each bank is then multiplied by 4 for compensatory damages, then 200 for punitive damages for a total of 800 times your claim amount. This is your total award amount. At completion of the process, the notarial judgement will be submitted for payment and you will be elligible for a percentage of this total.]
When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000)
When a child is born in the United States (and now all over the world) a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of Birth. The key word here is "registered" as in registered in international commerce. A child then become the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000) and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank, which then uses it as collateral in order to issue Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC 511). (Obtaining a birth certificate is not required under common law.)
A bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corp. At 55 Water Street in New York, about two blocks down the street from the FED. It is a high rise office building and the sign out front reads "the tower of power". When the birth certificate is issued, a separate legal entity is created, The separate entity, or alter ego (ALL CAPTIAL LETTER NAME) is the "straw man" (See Black's Law 6th edition dictionary) and it is the "accomodation party" of the Uniform commercial code 3-415.
Those all-capital letters do not represent the flesh and blood "Jack Smith” who was born to 'Momma Smith'. Those all cap letters represent the CORPORATE SURROGATE of Jack Smith known as "the strawman" that is REPRESENTING the flesh and blood Jack Smith in the CORPORATE COURT SYSTEM that has replaced Common Law courts, which the government doesn't want you to know about or think had ever existed.
The "name" is credit (see Black's 6th "accommodation party".) Therefore the right (or the use) has been separated from the title or deed.) The "Strawman" holds the title ( he belongs to the government's client who bought the title) and the real live you, flesh and blood man or woman has only naked possessions with the limited "right" to use the things. Maybe that is why our civil rights suits get dismissed out of court on Civil Rule 12(b)(6) motions. This deals with the "failure to state a title upon which relief can be granted." A claim is another word for "title". We have "failed to state upon which relief can be granted". We do not own the "title" to our own bodies anymore. When the straw man (you) violate some rule or statue (for instance a traffic ticket), the flesh and blood, the real you has to appear at the arraignment and admit the straw man's name (credit), and the "energy" surety is due and payable (fine) by the flesh and blood mwn who is in use of the straw man. This is why it is so important to "voluntarily give" your name to the magistrate (court). The defendant is the straw man. The real you, the flesh and blood you is the "offender". Go into a court room and fail to admit to your "NAME" and see how frustrated the Judge gets. The only way they can continue is to create the joinder between you and the NAME. You are not your NAME. And they only have jurisdiction over the NAME.
When you are given a birth certificate an entirely separate legal entity was created. This is called the "strawman". Of course this was done without your knowledge or consent as you were just an infant at the time. Your parents also had no idea their biological property would be used as security to back the fiat paper currency of our nation. The strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope that when you grew up, you would be fooled into believing that the strawman is actually you. Thus you'd be liable for all of the imaginary costs and liabilities attached to the strawman by these con-artists. It is shown in the ALL CAPITAL letter name displayed on the birth certificate, social security number, driver's license, tax forms, utility bills, and even credit card bills.
"Ignorance of the law is no excuse," is the excuse they use to purport this scheme upon the American people. However, this scheme exists in many other countries, proving just how far spread this deception goes. It comes down to wordplay, also known as legalese. Common words we use every day actually have an entirely different meaning when it comes to law. Yet, because we aren't privy to the knowledge of the "law society", we are so easily duped, via fraud and coercion, into being a part of the scheme. A part of the machine.
When anything is registered with the state, ownership is waived and all you are left with is a title, or a certificate. (i.e, the certificate of live birth, the title to your vehicle.) The registering of a baby's birth actually passes "ownership" of the baby to the government and that allows the State to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that. This applies until the child reaches the 'age of maturity' set by the current legal statutes. Doing that is not "lawful" but after the birth has been registered, it is "legal" and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly. Another way the State can gain ownership of a child is via the Marriage License. With this, the government becomes the principal in a contract involving the three of you, and gain an asset, which is then in the control of the government, the product of that marriage; the biological property; the children.
In Admiralty Law, Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.
To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage, where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward which they brought into this world by delivery, the act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards.
Then they asked your mother for your legal name in Upper Lower case which consists of one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally funded hospital, an act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust or substance thereof, was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the commercial registry as cargo under transportation.
The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and registered with the State, via Certificate of registry, in commercial maritime law which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving him/her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel occurred identified by the filing with, for example the "Florida State Department of Health", Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.
Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s asset, a certificate of indebtedness and funded the bond through the IMF based on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same.
If you have an older-style Birth Certificate, look on the Reverse side of it, to see 3 points of interest.
1) A 6-10 digit Number that you have never used in your life.
2) The words "Revenue Receipt" on the left side of this number.
3) The words "For Treasury Purposes Only" on the right side of the number.
So now the IMF has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested with the "State of Florida", and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve account.
That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the "defendant", the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for the IMF.
Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the Registrar/Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she is taken care of properly.
This first Legal Person attached to you, is known as a "NATIONAL CITIZEN" which later becomes synonymous with being a "Government Employee", when you SUBMIT (give in) an APPLICATION (to beg) for REGISTRATION (to sign over your rights) to become a SINner, (by signing up for the Fraud called Social Insurance or Social Security).
You then receive your Employee ID # (also known as a SIN #) which creates another Person called a "TAXPAYER". This means you consent to the Income Tax Act, and now makes you liable for the Income Tax, in exchange for the "Benefits" of being a Government Employee.
When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you, because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on behalf of the beneficial owner "the trust”, which is resident within a territory occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes "of trade” effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade with the enemy for the beneficial owner the "trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying, presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or chose in action on behalf of the trust.
"A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and that of state of country only." [19 Corpus Juris Secundumn (C.J.S), Corporations 886]
Filing a commercial lien against yourself.
• By filing the document you are noticing the ‘state’, the public, that you are regaining rightful control over the strawman- birth certificate name for your benefit and not the states and that you are now no longer delinquent.
• By filing you also show that you are the secured party and Principal Creditor to the strawman – vessel – trust – cestue Qui Trust as the Trust was set up to benefit the living spirit within the body of a man and NOT for the benefit of anyone else, government, corporations or your strawman.
• You – the living man, are the beneficiary of the Trust, the Trust being made up of a number of parties including you, your vessel, the state and Commonwealth Governments.
• The strawman is YOUR debtor. Because the living man is NOT to own anything, we have use and possession, as ‘good stewards’ it is the job of your vessel – agent in commerce, acting as a Trustee to the Trust, and whatever assets are being accumulated by the Trust is controlled by the Trustee – your strawman, for YOU as the beneficiary. YOU are therefore the ‘Holder in Due Course’ (HIDC) of the real estate assets held in Trust because the Titles are held in the name of you agent in commerce but the Deed is in YOUR possession and that makes YOU HIDC.
Upon filing a UCC1, you also produce several accompanying documents that are all PRIVATE documents and NOT to be issued into the public. All these documents ae referenced on your UCC1 filing by a code number so there is evidence of there existence, BUT they are to remain PRIVATE.
1. The first is the Security Agreement which is a private document evidencing a contract between you and your dead at law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an agreement that evidences that you have an mutually agreed with the agent in commerce that the vessel – agent in commerce owes you $1B, yep, one billion smakeroos. It lists a whole range of securities and their values which YOU have the principal lien position over, the whole of the estate and is a principal mechanism of protection against outside predators in the world, particularly on the high seas of admiralty law where there are abundant pirates called Governments and big corporations. Because YOU are the Principal Creditor, any other claimant against your vessel – agent in commerce, can only be a secondary creditor and can only get at your estate WHEN YOUR vessel – agent in commerce has been paid the $1Billion which you receive as beneficiary, then the predator may have access to the estate of the Trust. It is our most effective defence to protect real estate and other property from predators on the high seas.
2. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement. To my knowledge this private agreement between you and your agent in commerce is effected to ensure that you indemnify the public against any damage you, as the living, make against any member of the public as they operate only under limited liability insurance and therefore are at risk to damage by your day to day activities. It is simply insurance to protect members of the public from any accidental or delinquent actions from us as private people.
3. Private Agreement - is a private agreement evidencing a contract between you and your dead at law legal fiction strawman – crown security interest name. It is an agreement that evidences that there is an agreement a set of tasks and objectives between the parties. For example, it shows the strawman has agreed to accept all deposits for and on your behalf into his bank account(just look at your credit card or statement to identify whose account it is) because you cannot touch that filthy lucre. You in return, have agreed to fill out his tax return (he cannot because he is a piece of paper and is dead Fred!) and sign it John Henry Doe FOR JOHN HENRY DOE.
Do you own a home? A car? Do you have a credit card or a student loan?
Well, all of these different types of debt began with you filling out a promissory note (a contract). When this is submitted to the bank, and after an “approval process”, you receive that money by signing this contract. And the bank tells you quite dishonestly that you owe them a debt for that amount of money, and gives you permission to amortize the payment of that loan over a set amount of time, usually 30 years for a mortgage. But, they also charge you interest for this convenient “service”. That means that by the end of those 30 years you’ll probably have paid double if not triple what the actual loan amount was at the signing of the original contract (promissory note).
But there is one thing that the bank is not telling you. One very, very big piece of the puzzle…
Are you ready?
According to the Federal Reserve banks, and printed in their banking rulebooks, money is created when a person (you) signs a contract (promissory note) with a bank.
Huh…?
Let me explain…
Last year I remember hearing about a campaign to protect people from foreclosure by these banks and mortgage companies called “Show Me The Note!” At the time, I did not understand the significance of this simple but effective and protective statement. Now I do…
“Show Me The Note” is quite a valid request. It simply means that you are requesting the original contract (promissory note) that was signed by yourself and the foreclosing bank when the money was created and given to you to buy your home.
But you see… the bank cannot ever produce this note. And here’s why…
The bank sells your note (promissory note or deed) to the Federal Reserve the minute you sign it, and the Fed then gives that bank the amount that it then “loans” to you. Therefore, the bank is at a balance of $0.00 dollars at the point of inception and payment for your loan. Remember, this is how money is “created” according to the Federal Reserve banking rules and regulations.
The problem that these banks have is that they no longer hold the note (title) to your home, because they have already sold it at face value to the Federal Reserve. And in order for a creditor (the bank) to make a claim against the debtor (you), they must in a court of “law” show proof of their claim to collect your supposed debt to them. However, the only proof of their claim for the foreclosure of your home is in fact that original note (promise to pay, promissory note) that you signed, which created the money that enabled the bank to give you that loan in the first place – money out of thin air!
Remember, money is created only when you or I sign a contract to get “credit”. It is the very fact that all of this information is not disclosed to us that makes this contract null and void. Full disclosure must accompany any contract lest it be invalid and unlawful.
Your loan contract was sold to the Federal Reserve (a private corporate central bank) by the bank or mortgage company with whom you signed your contract. It’s gone… vanished… paid off! The Federal Reserve then bundles those deeds (contracts) and sells them as securities and bonds, to countries like China, Russia, and whoever else will buy them. So in essence, China may already own the title to your home, or at least it thinks it does…
And this is why the bank has no lawful grounds to foreclose on you. They do not hold a lawful lean on your home. You owe nothing to anybody! You created that money legally through the bank and Federal Reserve by accessing your trust account assigned to you by the UNITED STATES when they took your freedom and liberty and put your wealth and property at risk starting on the day you were born (birthed).
The principle and interest you pay to the bank is pure profit for the next 30 years, because you signed a contract saying that you would pay that amount with your home and land as collateral. But for a contract to be lawful, there must be full disclosure of these little facts. Since this was obviously not disclosed to you, all of these mortgage and other contracts are null and void. The bank has no contract, no proof of claim against your debt, and no rights to force you to pay them anything.
If this sounds like a copout from paying your bills, remember that the bank never risked anything, and they never gave you a penny of their own money. You did a favor to the banking system by creating new money. You created commerce. Nothing more…
And you are entitled to this money (worthless paper used for commerce) as an indentured citizen of the UNITED STATES who is used as collateral and assigned this value at birth.
And remember… due to the Fractional Reserve Banking System created by the Federal Reserve, the Fed creates 40 times the amount of your “loan” for its use, again making money out of thin air.
I hope that you are beginning to understand that this is another of the biggest scams in the history of scams, and that all bank loans, from credit cards to student loans to mortgages work in this same exact way, secured or unsecured. Again, this is how money is created into the economy, per the rules of the Federal Reserve Bank, the private corporation unaffiliated with our government or our nation, who control our monetary policy and can destroy the value of the dollar at any time the choose.
Do you really feel guilty about reclaiming your piece of the pie?
The only way to truly benefit from this freedom is by declaring your individual God-given rights of sovereignty through a UCC (Universal Commercial Code) filing. You must offset your debt lawfully as afforded you. You must become a Secured Party Creditor.
I cringe when I hear people say they aren’t going to fight the system and instead are going to give up their house. They feel hopeless. They feel like they can’t win…
But the truth is that there was never anything to lose! The bank has no claim!
But, I understand. Most will not buck the system simply because they do not understand the system and how the Constitution for the United States was set up to ensure this type of unlawful action like bank foreclosure can never be done to us. I took me a very long time to come to this comprehension. This is how freedom works, and it only works if you claim it.
This is the forbidden knowledge…
I guess it all boils down to this… What is an education?
If an education is defined as simply four years of partying and getting drunk in a frat house while barely passing the exams of one of the most sub-standard collegial educational systems in the first world (I believe we are 39th on the list) of which most of the information taught is to train us on how to follow these rules instead knowing and learning the actual laws… and if your level of education is defined by the amount of money paid in order to receive a less than prestigious diploma stating grade level and accomplishment… then I am happy to say that I am a college dropout! I am self-educated to the point that normal conversations with doctorate level graduates equate to a conversation with a child who still believes in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and the Easter Bunny… simply because that is what they are taught in the corporate indoctrination centers that we call schools. Rational thought, self-awareness, and sovereignty is not taught in school. And Law is not the prevailing wisdom in law school.
Then, when you realize that everything you see in the movies, television, and on the news is specifically designed to uphold the illusionary state of unconsciousness that most of us live in regarding our debt slavery, that’s the point where normal conversation as defined by the media driven society becomes unbearable. And fitting in at parties becomes impossible. I’m now the crazy guy… the one talking out of my butt. I’m the one who, despite the beauty, glory, and not to mention the fact of the information I try and relay, I am labeled as the negative one… the downer.
And so now I’m the antisocial one… the one who doesn’t go to parties. The one who cannot do small talk. And I’m the one that cannot keep normal friends simply because normal means brainwashed! And normalcy is not freedom in any way.
The friends I have made are necessarily informed or at least curious, somewhat awake, and want to learn what I have already learned or want to teach what I am seeking to learn. When you do meet these people, you develop a friendship and a trust that is unknown to most; kinship through shared plight.
And to anyone reading this, I have only this to say. I may not know you. You may think that no one really knows you. But I hope that you haven’t reached the point in your life where you’ve given up, where you’ve lost all hope, where learning was something you did as a teenager, and where happiness equates to blissful ignorance. I hope that you wont let these corporate monsters force you to be a victim of this. I hope this reaches you with the spirit it was intended, and I wish for you the best in whatever you do.
A sheep you are not… for you have read this far!
reverse-engineering a criminal matter
If the attorney determined that the claim had merit, he would take it before a Grand Jury. The Grand Jury would consider the situation, and if they felt that the claim needed to be heard before a petit jury, trier of facts, then the Grand Jury would issue a True Bill. Hmm, bill … sounds a little like commerce to me.
If a sheriff or marshal offers you the ‘benefit privilege’ of being arrested, what is the first thing you ask them for? You would ask them for the original signature order from the judge and the Affidavit for Probable Cause that instigated the whole thing in the first place.
If in the unlikely event that they did have the original warrant, your remedy would be to AFV and give it right back to them. [my son did that once … a traffic cop gave him a true bill and warrant in the form of a traffic ticket … my son did the AFV on the ticket and gave it right back to him … the cop said, ‘you just voided out my ticket’, and my son said, ‘yes, and I will do it to every other ticket you give me’, so the cop went back to his cruiser and wrote out another ticket and just threw the copy of the ticket into the back of my son’s truck … and ran off].
Usually what happens is that they only have some copy of some supposed warrant, and so they arrest you and put on handcuffs (for their safety as you can use whatever physical resistance you are capable of if the warrant is illegally served … which it always is) and haul you off to jail. “Every person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest ... and, in preventing such illegal restraint of his liberty, he may use such force as may be necessary.” Columbus v. Holmes, 152 N.E.2d 306 (1958).
So, what is the remedy for that? Sue the warrant! One good way to sue the warrant is to do a habeas corpus. If a warrant is sued, it is presumed to be fraudulent.
I used to hear a man say, find the first defect in the paperwork, and you are 2/3 done.
Now if you haven’t done any of that, what will have to happen is that they will have to identify you. Technically, they will be trying to identify you as being a citizen. If you are a citizen, then all of the statutes and codes kick in making you liable for the public or national debt. If that can be established then you are considered to be an ‘absconding’ debtor (meaning that you are taking off with some of the property belonging to the state, etc.), then they will put you in a holding cell or jail until you can be arraigned before a magistrate to see why you haven’t paid your bills, in particular, the True Bill.
Paramount to establishing a contract between you and the court is for you to give them your name and hopefully they can get a signature or two out of you.
So, the remedy for those requests is … don’t give them your name and don’t sign anything.
Perhaps you might use the tactic Roger used years ago whereas if they ask you for your name, you simply ask them for theirs, and then follow with the rest of the questions … do you have a claim against me, etc.
Brandon, Gordon and Jack have recently come up with some things to say which seem to work real well. You could say, ‘well I am the authorized representative for JOHN DOE’. And then there is a further conversation that could be had from there.
Or you might say, ‘I won’t say it for fear you will misspell it. If you will write it down exactly as I spell it, then here it is…’. Or you can wear a name tag.
If they insist you sign something, just ask, ‘can I be forced to sign a contract against my will’? If they say ‘yes’ or still pressure you to sign, you might ask, ‘so then, what you are implying is that you are waiving your bond and insurance and making all of your personal property available for seizure by me.?
Or you could give a qualified signature which could be used to ‘set up’ a situation later on. If you just give what would be called a general signature without any qualifiers, then you are granting them general jurisdiction on your signature. But you can qualify your signature in any number of ways. Some of the most popular are By: Authorized Representative, or Grantor, Trustee, Beneficiary, Executor, UCC 1-308, UCC 3-402 b, etc. But what you are doing is allowing your signature to be used only in those limiting situations.
At some point they will be wanting you to plead or pray (but you won’t be praying to God, you will be praying to the false idol known as the ‘state’).
If you are in shackles, you might ask them to take off the restraints because you can’t speak freely unless you are free to do so. Otherwise any contract you enter into will be done under duress and will not have any effect later on.
If they free you up, tell them that you need an appearance bond at no cost to you so that you can speak in the court. If they refuse the appearance bond, ask them if anyone present is holding a bond on you? Who is holding the bond in this case?
***at this point it is important that you always get an answer to every question that they put to you. You should ask responsive questions which require only a yes or no answer. Never ask a second question until you have the first one answered.***
Remember that your appearance in the magistrate court is totally civil. What is being determined is whether or not you have paid your bill.
Must Know Information,please forward...
All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment. Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested. It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in! This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.
Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust. The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.
The public is encouraged to purchase all kinds of insurance protection when the TRUST actually pays for all physical damages; medical costs; new technology and death benefits. The hype to purchase insurance is a ploy to keep us in poverty and profit off our stupidity because the Vatican owns the controlling interest in all Insurance Companies.
You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST. Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time. Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them. If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it? A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due. Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.
STEPS/PROCEDURE FOR DEALING WITH A PRESENTMENT/BILL
Undertaking the steps for
dealing with a commercial presentment/offer, i.e. “presentment,” is predicated
on the following events having occurred prior to commencing the steps outlined
herewith. These prior events are:
A. You have “captured your
straw man” by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the real, biological
being, indicated by name in upper- and lower-case letters, as the Secured Party
and your “nom de guerre” or corporate franchise, indicated by all capital
letters, filed is the DEBTOR.
B. You have likewise filed a
Security Agreement in the Commercial Registry, either on the original UCC-1 or
a subsequent UCC Change Statement (a “UCC-3” in Washington), in which the
DEBTOR has indemnified the Secured Party by pledging all of DEBTOR’S property
as collateral against any kind of loss or harm that should accrue to the
Secured Party as the result of any transmitting utility activities of
DEBTOR. Such loss or harm would occur,
for instance, if the DEBTOR, and thereby the Secured Party on whose behalf
DEBTOR functions in commerce as a transmitting utility and for which Secured Party signs as the accommodating
party, is fined, charged, or imprisoned by some commercial presentment having
been issued against the DEBTOR which the system deems to have been
dishonored.
UCC 9-105(l) states:
“’Security agreement’ means an agreement which creates or provides for a
security interest.” Black’s 6th
states: “An agreement granting a creditor a security interest in personal
property, which security interest is normally perfected either by the creditor
taking possession of the collateral or by filing financing statements in the
proper public records.” The Security
Agreement you file in the Commercial Registry is a binding, sealed contract
between DEBTOR and Secured Party
which includes, inter alia, an
itemization of the property/collateral the DEBTOR has pledged to the Secured
Party. All the property belongs to the
DEBTOR but the Secured Party holds
all interest in it. Since the DEBTOR has
pledged all of DEBTOR’S property/collateral to the Secured Party, and a binding contract is filed registering and
recording that agreement and the Fidelity Bond posted by the DEBTOR to
indemnify the Secured Party against
loss, no third party is able to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
against DEBTOR or any of the property pledged by DEBTOR to Secured Party. All commercial affairs are the province of
and interactions of commercial entities with, the DEBTOR, as per the text in
one’s UCC-1 stating: “All proceeds, products, accounts, and fixtures, and the
Orders therefrom, are released to DEBTOR.”
C. You have received an actual
presentment/offer, not merely a notice, and still have time to deal with it
within ten (10) days of your receipt thereof.
A presentment is a demand for payment or acceptance, involving some kind
of necessity to engage in specific performance desired by the party issuing the
presentment, hereinafter the “Offeror.”
The specific performance occurs when you fail to deal with the
presentment properly—a dishonor—and the Offeror does a Banker’s Acceptance of
your dishonor of the presentment. If you
simply pay he wins automatically; if you fight or do nothing, you traverse or
dishonor and are locked in to the commercial jurisdiction in which they always
win unless you have “captured your straw man” and properly dealt with their
presentments. All arrests and
incarcerations today consist of seizing the collateral/surety (the real you) to
pay the debt against the DEBTOR based upon their having done a Banker’s
Acceptance of your commercial dishonor and executed a Bill of Exchange with themselves as Creditor and your straw man
as DEBTOR.
Since any bill,
presentment/offer, you receive from the system is a commercial instrument,
whether it is a traffic citation, tax bill, or summons to court, the procedure
for dealing with it is the same. With
the exception of an alternate way to approach a traffic ticket within the first
few days of receiving it (which will be discussed separately), the steps
herewith should obtain in all cases.
For a document that is not a
presentment, such as a notice, receipt, license, birth certificate, or Social
Security Card, etc., you should accept it for value, and thereby be the holder in due course thereof and of all
matters connected therewith and derived therefrom. For that (unless it is for the Treasury,
concerning which you always use the large Treasury stamp regardless of what the
document is), stamp a copy of your document with the following text:
ACCEPTED FOR VALUE
All related endorsements, front and back, in
accordance
with Uniform Commercial Code
3-419 and House Joint Resolution 192
of June 5,
1933.
You may affix your signature
and the date underneath the text (in blue ink, of course), if you wish.
D. You have sent your Actual and Constructive Notice and
non-negotiable Bill of Exchange to
Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary of the Treasury, Department of the Treasury, to
charge back the debt against your Birth Certificate from the public
(debt/liability) side to your private (credit/asset) side from which all the
“money” in circulation is borrowed to pay on the interest on the “national
debt” and reorganization in bankruptcy.
Staple the entire set of
documents you send to Summers together in a single unit consisting of the
following items:
ACN, Bill of Exchange, attachments stamped with the large Treasury
“accepted for value” stamp, an IRS 1040-ES with the amount left blank, filling
in your all capital-letter DEBTOR straw man, Social Security #, and statutory address. Affix a sticky note (Post-it) to the 1040-ES
on which you have written: “Please complete this form for me (pre-paid
account).” The IRS calls a Bill of Exchange a “UCC Contract,” and accepts
them as valid. Any Bill of Exchange you
send into the Treasury is shipped to an IRS office in your state awaiting being
matched with a 1040-ES, at which point the IRS deducts the amount it wants in
taxes from the amount of the Bill of Exchange.
By stapling the 1040-ES on the Bill of Exchange you short-circuit the
time and trouble for one to catch up with the other through the bureaucracy and
mailings involved.
All of the mailings you do
should be sent with proof of service (or even affidavit of service) mailed by a
third party, by Certified or Registered Mail.
Each of the steps should be done within time frames as herein-below
indicated, usually approximately ten (10) days apart.
Preliminary documents needed
include:
• Affidavit of Service, “Proof
of Service.”
• Security Agreement.
• Actual
and Constructive Notice to Lawrence H. Summers, Secretary of the Treasury.
• Non-Negotiable Bill of
Exchange to Summers, one with value indicated, one without designated amount
for Summers to fill in.
1.
Make several copies of your presentment. Place the original, pristine (un-stapled and
not written upon), in a safe place.
Never part with your original for any reason to anyone. Make copies and deal with them. Stamp as many as are necessary (depending
upon how many people they must be sent to) with the following text:
This presentment is accepted
for value, with all related endorsements front and back, in accordance with
Uniform Commercial Code 3-419 and House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933;
pre-paid; exempt from levy.
_____________________________________ ____________________
[Name] [Date]
Sign your name and date the
stamp using blue ink. Send back to the
Offeror(s) (the persons who sent you the presentment) with an Actual and Constructive Notice, “ACN-1,”
informing the Offeror(s) that you have accepted the presentment for value,
“Banker’s Acceptance,” and that each Offeror has 72 hours per the Federal Truth
In Lending Act, to withdraw the offer or his failure to notice you within the
prescribed time constitutes a dishonor establishing you as undisputed Creditor
and holder in due course of the presentment and all matters attached thereto
and derived therefrom. Send by Certified
or Registered Mail with 3rd party proof of service. Ideally one should use an Affidavit of
Service that is signed and notarially acknowledged by a non-party to the action
and mailed by him with your entire package.
Each recipient receives an original Affidavit of Service with the
package.
2.
Wait ten (10) days after sending off the first mailing to see if you
receive from the Offeror a notice that the presentment/offer has been withdrawn
(cancelled). If you receive such a
notice it means that the matter is ended as if it had never occurred. What is most likely, however (until the
system catches up with what is happening with this process), is that you will
hear nothing from them. In such case, on
the 10th day send out the following items to the appropriate parties
by the specified means:
a. Send a Bill of Exchange to Summers, executed for
the amount you have placed on your Banker’s Acceptance of the Offeror’s
dishonor and your status as Creditor and holder
in due course. Some respected
thinkers concerning this process advocate printing your Bill of Exchange on banker’s paper, certificate stock, since it
is the commercial paper. The argument
against doing this is that it looks too much like a security, which might
arouse their ire, and regular 8½” X 11” white paper works quite well. It is also much easier to execute than doing
a certificate on bank paper. In any
case, send the Bill of Exchange to
Summers with an ACN and copy of the presentment on which you have affixed the
large Treasury stamp, signed and dated in blue ink. The set of documents you send to Summers
consist of:
• ACN-2 of instructions to
Summers, which includes specifying the amount as to how much you are billing
the Offeror. Because of the bonds and
insurance issued on presentments, it is recommended that one set a value of
100X the face amount of the presentment.
If, for instance, the amount of the traffic ticket fine is $300, make
your Bill of Exchange for
$30,000. Since you are the Creditor and
the Offeror is reduced to your Debtor devoid of defenses, you are authorized to
affix the value of the Offeror’s debt obligation owed to you.
• Bill
of Exchange for
the above amount, executed on Banker’s Paper or Stock Certificate (this is the
commercial paper).
• Copy of the presentment with
the large Treasury “accepted for value” stamp, signed and dated by you in blue
ink. The text of the Treasury stamp is:
Non-Negotiable
Charge Back
Lawrence H. Summers or
Office Holder
Secretary of the Treasury
_________________________________ accepts
for value all
related endorsements,
front and back, in accordance with Uniform
Commercial Code 3-419 and House Joint
Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933.
Charge
Treasury Direct Account Employer Identification # __________ for the
registration fees
and command the memory
of account # __________ to charge
the
same the Debtor’s Order or the
Order of Lawrence
H. Summers or Office Holder.
Employer Identification #
____________
Pre-Paid - Preferred Stock
Priority - Exempt from Levy
Posted: Certified Account #
______________
Invoice
# _______________________________
b. Send a thank-you letter to
Offeror which includes the following items:
• ACN-3 to the Offeror
thanking him for his business, informing him that:
-He has passed the time to
withdraw his offer;
-You are the holder in due course of the presentment/offer;
-You are established as the
Creditor who has performed a Banker’s Acceptance on his note whereby he is
Debtor in the amount of the Bill of
Exchange you have sent to Summers;
-He must adjust your
account.
• Copy of everything you sent
to Summers, with everything clearly stamped “COPY.”
• Accounting letter informing
the Offeror how to adjust the account.
c. File a UCC-3 Change
Statement, checked “amendment” and “partial release” in the action line, adding
the presentment, stamped accepted for value, to your commercial affairs and
putting Bill of Exchange on your UCC
and (in the same filing) released from your filing. Cite the accounting, which should look like:
Entered on account: [Amount
of Bill of Exchange]
Partial release: [Amount of
Bill of Exchange]
Balance on Account: $0.00
3.
Ten (10) days after the above three (3) mailings, if you have received
no notice from the Offeror that he has adjusted your account, send the first
notice of his requirement to do so, ACN-4.
Include a W-9 and let him know that if he does not adjust the account
you require him to return the W-9 to you with his fiduciary tax report or
individual tax return (1040). Also
inform him that he is retaining the funds, refusing to clear the commercial
account, and may thereby be liable for the taxes on his unauthorized retention
of the funds since the account has been adjusted in the Treasury, discharged,
and your account is pre-paid.
4.
Ten (10) days after sending the above first notice, send the Offeror a
second notice. This notice is similar to
the first notice, but warn him that if he does not provide the W-9 and
fiduciary tax report or 1040 you will send an IRS Form 8300, suspicious
transaction, to the IRS and an SEC Suspicious Activity Report, which is sent to
FinCEN in Detroit. This automatically
goes to six (6) different agencies (of the Federal Reserve): FRB, FDIC, OCC,
OTS, NCUA, and TREASURY.
MONEY FROM NOTHING. Montgomery vs. Daly
I. MONEY FROM NOTHING.
It’s been called the most astounding sleight of hand ever devised. The creation of money privatized, and usurped from Congress by a private banking cartel. Most people think money is issued by fiat through the government, but that is not the case. Except for coins, which compose only about one one-thousandth of the total U.S. money supply, all of our money is created by private banks. Federal Reserve Notes (dollar bills) are issued by the Federal Reserve, a private banking corporation, and lent to the government at interest, creating a huge debt to the nation. A debt the nation can never get out of unless the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is abolished. Moreover, Federal Reserve Notes and coins together compose less than 3 percent of the money supply. The other 97 percent is created by commercial banks as loans, and backed by nothing.
You don’t believe banks create the money they lend? Neither did the jury in a landmark Minnesota case, until they heard the evidence. First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script. Every American that is facing a housing crisis should take note.
Defendant Jerome Daly opposed the bank’s foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. “Consideration” (“the thing exchanged”) is an essential element of a contract. All contracts need an offer, acceptance and consideration to be valid.
Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn’t given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president, took the stand. To everyone’s surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money “out of thin air” for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. “It sounds like fraud to me,” intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors. In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.
The court rejected the bank’s claim for foreclosure, and the defendant kept his house. To Daly, the implications were enormous. If bankers were indeed extending credit without consideration – without backing their loans with money they actually had in their vaults and were entitled to lend – a decision declaring their loans void could topple the power base of the world. He wrote in a local news article:
This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State banks to be null and void. This amounts to an emancipation of this Nation from personal, national and state debt purportedly owed to this banking system. Every American owes it to himself . . . to study this decision very carefully . . . for upon it hangs the question of freedom or slavery.
Needless to say, however, the decision failed to change prevailing practice, although it was never overruled. It was heard in a Justice of the Peace Court, an autonomous court system dating back to those frontier days when defendants had trouble traveling to big cities to respond to summonses. In that system (which has now been phased out), judges and courts were pretty much on their own. Justice Mahoney, who was not dependent on campaign financing or hamstrung by precedent, went so far as to threaten to prosecute and expose the bank. He died less than six months after the trial, in a mysterious accident that appeared to involve poisoning. Since that time, a number of defendants have attempted to avoid loan defaults using the defense Daly raised; but they have met with only limited success. As one judge said off the record:
If I let you do that – you and everyone else – it would bring the whole system down. I cannot let you go behind the bar of the bank. We are not going behind that curtain!
From time to time, however, the curtain has been lifted long enough for us to see behind it. A number of reputable authorities have attested to what is going on, including Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920s. He declared in an address at the University of Texas in 1927: “The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. . . . Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”
Robert H. Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta in the Great Depression, wrote in 1934: “We are completely dependent on the commercial Banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the Banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon.”
Graham Towers, Governor of the Bank of Canada from 1935 to 1955, acknowledged: “Banks create money. That is what they are for. . . . The manufacturing process to make money consists of making an entry in a book. That is all. . . . Each and every time a Bank makes a loan . . . new Bank credit is created — brand new money.”
Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury under Eisenhower, said in an interview reported in the August 31, 1959 issue of U.S. News and World Report: “[W]hen a bank makes a loan, it simply adds to the borrower’s deposit account in the bank by the amount of the loan. The money is not taken from anyone else’s deposit; it was not previously paid in to the bank by anyone. It’s new money, created by the bank for the use of the borrower.”
II. The Following is the Actual Court Record of:
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MONTGOMERY VS. JEROME DALY
IN THE JUSTICE COURT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF SCOTT
TOWNSHIP OF CREDIT RIVER
JUSTICE MARTIN V. MAHONEY
First National Bank of Montgomery,
Plaintiff
vs
Jerome Daly,
Defendant
JUDGMENT AND DECREE
The above entitled action came on before the Court and a Jury of 12 on December 7, 1968 at 10:00 am. Plaintiff appeared by its President Lawrence V. Morgan and was represented by its Counsel, R. Mellby. Defendant appeared on his own behalf.
A Jury of Talesmen were called, impaneled and sworn to try the issues in the Case. Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.
Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession of Lot 19 Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minn. Plaintiff claimed title to the Real Property in question by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed dated May 8, 1964 which Plaintiff claimed was in default at the time foreclosure proceedings were started.
Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff’s sale passed no title to plaintiff.
The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.
Mr. Morgan admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this. Plaintiff further claimed that Defendant by using the ledger book created credit and by paying on the Note and Mortgage waived any right to complain about the Consideration and that the Defendant was estopped from doing so.
At 12:15 on December 7, 1968 the Jury returned a unanimous verdict for the Defendant.
Now therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Constitution of United States and the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota not inconsistent therewith ;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:
1.That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.
2.That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.
3.That the Sheriff’s sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.
4.That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.
5.That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.
The following memorandum and any supplementary memorandum made and filed by this Court in support of this Judgment is hereby made a part hereof by reference.
BY THE COURT
Dated December 9, 1968
Justice MARTIN V. MAHONEY
Credit River Township
Scott County, Minnesota
MEMORANDUM
The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.
Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558. The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree. Only God can create something of value out of nothing.
Even if Defendant could be charged with waiver or estoppel as a matter of Law this is no defense to the Plaintiff. The Law leaves wrongdoers where it finds them. See sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd “Actions” on page 584 – “no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party.”
Plaintiff’s act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built.
Nothing in the Constitution of the United States limits the jurisdiction of this Court, which is one of original Jurisdiction with right of trial by Jury guaranteed. This is a Common Law action. Minnesota cannot limit or impair the power of this Court to render Complete Justice between the parties. Any provisions in the Constitution and laws of Minnesota which attempt to do so is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and void. No question as to the Jurisdiction of this Court was raised by either party at the trial. Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fit.
No complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury. Their Verdict could not reasonably have been otherwise. Justice was rendered completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, freely and without purchase, conformable to the laws in this Court of December 7, 1968.
BY THE COURT
December 9, 1968
Justice Martin V. Mahoney
Credit River Township
Scott County, Minnesota.
Note: It has never been doubted that a Note given on a Consideration which is prohibited by law is void. It has been determined, independent of Acts of Congress, that sailing under the license of an enemy is illegal. The emission of Bills of Credit upon the books of these private Corporations for the purpose of private gain is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States and is unlawful. See Craig v. Mo. 4 Peters Reports 912. This Court can tread only that path which is marked out by duty. M.V.M.
JEROME DALY had his own information to reveal about this case, which establishes that between his own revealed information and the fact that Justice Martin V. Mahoney was murdered 6 months after he entered the Credit River Decision on the books of the Court, why the case was never legally overturned, nor can it be
III. JEROME DALY’S OWN ENTRY
REGARDING JUSTICE MAHONEY’S MEMORANDUM
FORWARD: The above Judgment was entered by the Court on December 9, 1968. The issue there was simple – Nothing in the law gave the Banks the right to create money on their books. The Bank filed a Notice of Appeal within 10 days. The Appeals statutes must be strictly followed, otherwise the District Court does not acquire Jurisdiction upon Appeal. To effect the Appeal the Bank had to deposit $2.00 with the Clerk within 10 days for payment to the Justice when he made his return to the District Court. The Bank deposited two $1.00 Federal Reserve Notes. The Justice refused the Notes and refused to allow the Appeal upon the grounds that the Notes were unlawful and void for any purpose. The Decision is addressed to the legality of these Notes and the Federal Reserve System. The Cases of Edwards v. Kearnzey and Craig vs Missouri set out in the decision should be studied very carefully as they bear on the inviolability of Contracts. This is the Crux of the whole issue. Jerome Daly.
SPECIAL NOTATION. Justice Mahoney denied the use of Federal Reserve Notes, since they represent debt instruments, not true money, from being used to pay for the appeal process itself. In order to get this overturned, since the bank’s appeal without the payment being recognized was out of time, it would have required that the Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota bring a Title 42, Section 1983 action against the judicial act of Justice Mahoney for a violation of the Constitution of the United States under color of law or authority, and if successful, have the case remanded back to him to either retry the case or allow the appeal to go through. But the corrupt individuals behind the bank(s) were unable to ever elicit such a decision from any federal court due to the fact that because of their vile hatred for him and what he had done to them and their little Queen’s Scheme, had him murdered (same as them murdering him) just about 6 months later. And so, the case stands, just as it was. Amazingly, if they hadn’t been so arrogant about the value of their federal reserve notes and paid the Justice just 2 measly silver dollars, or else 4 measly half dollars, or else 8 measly quarters, or else 20 measly dimes, or else 40 measly nickels, or else 200 measly pennies, they could have had their appeal and would not have had to get blood on their hands.
As it is, they are now known for their bloody ways, and the day will come when the American people will reap vengeance upon them for such a heinous and villainous act. Amen.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)