What is this 1099-OID?

During your lifetime you have probably NOT had the Secretary of the Treasury / IRS ‘paying’ / discharging your debts for you or adjusting the [your] account according to HJR192.

You, like most people, have been giving your equity away (paying your bills) in the form of Federal Reserve Notes that you acquired through your labor.

You had the pre-paid account available but didn’t know it existed, or didn’t know how to use it, and the net result is you have been paying for ‘stuff’ the company should have been “paying” for all along.

Its time to fill out an “expense report” (a Form 1099-OID) and sending it to the payroll clerk to be reimbursed for the ‘stuff’ you paid for that the company was supposed to pay for.

The Form 1099-OID is known as an “original issue discount” form.

Remember that all men/women issue (originate) from the ground? They are God’s creation and therefore all labor that originates from them is also considered ‘original issue’.

Since we eventually return to the ground - all labor also needs to be returned to the source of the labor, and that would be to the man/woman who created products and services from his/her labor.

The 1099-OID is basically an expense report that needs to be submitted to ‘the company’ via the ‘payroll clerk’ to be reimbursed for purchases you made that the company should have paid for in the first place. Just like an expense report you need to attach the receipts (only in the event of and IRS audit) to the 1099 for proper accounting by the ‘payroll clerk’.

So let's review:

• When you were born your parents entered a contract with the government / ‘the company’ that was bankrupt and you essentially went to work part time for them, to help pay off the debt the ‘company’ had incurred.
• The instrument that was used was the “Application for Live Birth Certificate” and it became a binding contract. It also became a pledge to / for the ‘company’ and security they use to ‘pay’ the debt the ‘company’ has with the bankers.
• One can redeem and regain control of the [birth certificate] instrument by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the Secretary of State in one’s state and listing the birth certificate as [your] ‘property’, or collateral.
• By filling out the Form SS-5 “Application for Social Security Benefits” we entered into another contract that allowed the ‘company’ to access the [our] prepaid account that was created with the passage of House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192. (learn about this resolution) the SS-5 can be revoked and the contract rescinded by simply filling out an Form SS521 “Withdrawal of Social Security Benefits”.
• By creating a bond and sending it with a copy of one’s duly filed UCC-1 to the Secretary of the Treasury one can then access the prepaid account that was created and begin to discharge any debt incurred from that point forward.
• Please be aware that this is an ongoing learning process. If there is something you don’t understand DO NOT DO THESE PROCEDURES. Get some help from someone who has done this. As one may suspect, this website doesn’t cover everything needed.

The IRS is my Friend?! - YES!

If they are not now, they soon will be…

Let’s review who the IRS really is… the IRS is the accounting and collection division of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the bankers, who the company owes money to.

They are the ones who enforce and oversee the bankruptcy of the ‘company’. They are really not your enemy… they are only doing what they were hired to do, and that is to keep track of the bankruptcy of the company. It is imperative we learn how to use them to our advantage as they can be a tremendous resource for us.

The Secretary of the Treasury is like the payroll clerk at ‘most any company you may work for. He acts in a dual capacity as both “payroll clerk” and receiver in the bankruptcy for the bankers.
With additional documents and letters not covered in this presentation one can call upon the Secretary, or the IRS, to adjust the accounts and “pay” the bills, taxes, and the like, that we have accumulated over time and have the debt incurred “paid off” using the pre-paid account that is waiting for us to use.

Now the question you may have is - "So all I have to do is accept the bill for the value I gave it when my labor was pledged and send it back to the party who sent the bill and they forward it to the Secretary of the Treasury and he will use my prepaid account to settle and close the account/debt?"

You got it. That’s basically how it works. We call upon the Secretary to do what he was hired to do and that is to make adjustments to the [our] account - to set it to zero when we incur, in the normal course of doing business (i.e.; living), things like:

• Car payments,
• credit cards,
• utilities, taxes, etc
• YES all of them!

Now lets talk about the 1099 OID...

So How Does This All Work - For You!?

So far it has worked real good for the company… they just didn’t tell you how to go about getting your debt set off and how to access and use the pre-paid account.

Well, that’s just great! So what can you do?!

One must acquire a “certified copy” of one’s birth certificate from the keeper of the records in your state, usually the department of vital records, and do what is called an “accepted for value”.

Stamp Specimen

“Accept for value” the birth certificate and create a “bond” ( an insurance policy guaranteeing we won’t harm anyone) and send them both with a copy of the UCC-1 financing statement, proving our security interest in the birth certificate, and send it all to the ‘payroll clerk’ of the company, also known as “the Secretary of the Treasury.”


We need to let him know that we want use our pre-paid account. Think about it - it is the same as asking him to pay for the expenses we have incurred on an “expense report” while being employed with the ‘company’.

The company gave us an “expense account” the prepaid account… we might as well use it.

When someone sends you a bill it is what is referred to as a “presentment.” What they are attempting to do is create “new money” with…“money of account”

“Check book money” - by getting you to accept the liability they are sending you, and get you to “pay” the bill with “money of exchange” (Federal Reserve Notes) or the equity you created, i.e. money that was created as a result of your labor!

In commerce - whoever creates a liability MUST bring in the remedy as well. If the sender doesn’t send the funds to ‘pay’ the bill you must accept the bill for the value you gave it when you were born and use your exemption / prepaid account to off set the debt the sender is creating.

So, it is your choice whether to “set off” the debt with your pre-paid account by accepting the bill for value and sending the bill to the “Paymaster”, i.e.; the Secretary of the Treasury, or IRS for adjustment, OR give them the equity from your labor, i.e., Federal Reserve Notes.

So what do you do? - You accept the bill for value and send it to the “payroll clerk”…

So What is the Catch??

Now, do you see why they don’t want to let a new-born out of the hospital, without a Social Security Account Number?

They want access to that prepaid account, and the only way they can is if they offer some type of benefit that you [albeit unwittingly] accept, also known as, the social security insurance program.

The creation of the social security account created what is known as a “cestui-que trust account.”

A cestui que trust is a formal Latin term referring to a beneficiary having an equitable interest in a trust, with the legal title being vested to the trustee. The law looks with suspicion upon transactions between trustees and beneficiaries, and, when the cestui que trust sells trust property to the trustee, the burden is placed upon the grantee or trustee to whom such transfer is made to show that the grantor or cestue que trust was in possession of full information and acted upon her own volition or independent advice, and free from all influence of the grantee or trustee to whom such transfer is made.

"A trust is an equitable obligation binding a person (who is called a trustee) to deal with property over which he has control (which is called the trust property) for the benefit of persons (who are called beneficiaries or cestui que trust) of whom he may himself be one, and anyone of whom may enforce the obligation. Any act or neglect on the part of a trustee which is not authorized or excused by the terms of the trust instrument, or by law, is a breach of trust."
- Justice Romer in Green v Underhill -


So how does it work?...
So with the history aside, are you ready for some good news?!

Your debt, is actually “prepaid” with what is known as “money of account.”

There is no real substance or “money of exchange” like gold and silver- only accounting-adjustments and set offs. They agreed to do this for you, with the passage of House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192 back in 1933. SWEET! Sign me up for that program! Truth is, you already ARE -- its just that no one told you about it, UNTIL NOW!

Like all good companies, they offer to their “employees” insurance benefits. They offer insurance to us if we would fill out a Form SS-5 also known as an “Application for Social Security Benefits”. This all originated from the “Shepard Towners Maternity act” which was to help new mothers with the care of their children if the mother was unwed. (this is why they ask for the maiden name of the mother on the “application for live birth certificate”. We are all considered to be “bastard children” with the ‘company’ as our ‘daddy’.)

The SS-5 is really a power of attorney for the company who issued the insurance benefit to the real man. Power of attorney was given to the corporation, [a/k/a] the government. When they established the new account they styled the name [TITLE] in ALL CAPS [JOHN HENRY DOE] which is really a corporation. It is the name/ title of a corporation. The Social Security Number (SSN) is [prima facie] evidence that there is an insurance policy. The benefits that one receives include the privilege of an army, navy, police, fire protection, courts, jails, prisons, etc.

When we filled out the Form SS-5 we ‘allowed’ the ‘company’ access to our account, our check book as it were, the pre-paid account that was set-up when our birth certificate issued. We gave them permission as signers to write checks on our account, and they do all the time. Keep in mind, this is the same account the bankers fractionalized and created huge, almost unlimited sums of “money”, and we became ‘co-business partners’, with the ‘company’. They are able to access and use our pre-paid account, for whatever they deem necessary.
In order to understand what this is, we need to go way back and discuss how you are seen in the eyes of the government:

When you were born your parents applied for a certification / citizenship / part time* job… with the [THE] “United States” which is a corporation / company.

* “part time” because your full time job is you are working for YOU!!! Your full time job you receive money of exchange, because you are exchanging your labor for other products and services of equal value. There is no real gain , therefore no income, therefore no income tax.

The application they made was known as “an application for a live birth certificate” and what issued from this application was known as a “birth certificate”

The ‘company’, the “United States” kept the original application and gave your parents a copy of a birth certificate. This created what is known as a “foreign situs trust account”.

Big, big problems though… when you were born you in essence went to ‘work’ for the ‘company’.

Problem is, the ‘company’ you went to work for could not pay back the loans they had with the bank and the company had to go into bankruptcy in 1933, therefore they had no way to pay you… furthermore, the company came to your parents and asked to borrow your assets, and your parents [unwittingly] obliged, thus making you one of the companies’ creditors.

The ‘company’ then took the application and pledged your future labor as a guarantee for payment to the bankers, also known as the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The bankers gave the company a credit for your application against the amount that the company owed the bankers, which at the time of your birth, was worth close to 1 million dollars. This transaction is what is referred to as a “money of account” transaction, as no real money changed hands. It was simply an accounting entry against the debt owed to the bankers, by the company.

The bankers then took the [your] application, and used fractional banking lending. It is the birth certificate that is proof that an application was submitted. It is the application that is the real negotiable instrument and the birth certificate proves there is a negotiable instrument being used in commerce -- to borrow money.

Fractional Banking - For those that don't know, is the bank's ability to loan out nine times what has been deposited. Therefore, if you deposit $100 in your bank, the bank can the loan out $900 to other people, or even yourself, and collect the interest on it.

If a [your] birth certificate is worth, say, 1 million, the bank can loan that same 1 million out as many as 9 times, thus making the [your] birth certificate worth 9 million; and it keeps going, going and going. A [your] birth certificate, has almost unlimited value associated with it.

However, because as it was pledged, you became involved in what is known as “involuntary servitude” or basically a slave to the company, in what is known as an ‘invisible contract’ since you didn’t even know about it…

I'm sure at this point you may be thinking this sounds almost like when you bought a car... You got it … look at a [your] birth certificate and notice that it reads just like a title to a car; weight so many pounds… date of delivery… parties involved…certain size length… hey, now they will even get a foot print to prove it is you.

Think about it… what does the bank do when you borrow money on a car? They keep the “title” for “safe keeping” until the debt is paid.

Once the debt is paid, they release the title back to the original owner. For now, you get the use of the car, until the debt is paid.

• We must remember the “title” to the car IS NOT the car!
• They took the “title” to your body, the birth certificate and borrowed money against it. That is exactly what a birth certificate is, A TITLE.
• Remember, You are NOT the title. You are you,
• A Flesh and blood man or woman, not so much ink on paper.

Since you are the only one who gives “value” to the birth certificate because of your labor,
you are the only one who can go to the ‘bank’ and redeem and regain control of the [your] birth certificate.

Just like the car. The car gives value to the title to the car. You give value to the title, the [your] birth certificate. Without you, the birth certificate is worthless.

Right now, even though they have no legal right or claim or lien, the bankers control your “title” / birth certificate.

You can regain control by simply filing a notice of lien against the birth certificate.

This is done every day. Banks file notices of liens with the Department of Commerce to prove and establish their interest in all kinds of property… homes, cars, tools, equipment.

This is done very simply by contacting the Secretary of State or Department of Commerce and filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement and listing the property as collateral, on the statement. The same can be done with the birth certificate, which is your property.

You and only you, can file this notice of lien… you and only you, can determine the value of the property.

In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond. AUTOTRIS CUSIP DTCC

IT IS ALL ABOUT BONDS

What they’re doing in these courts is all about Bonds. When you go into the courtroom after you’re arrested, they use two different sets of Bonds. What they do when your arrested they fill out a “Bid Bond”. The United States District Court uses 273, 274 & 275. SF = “Standard Form”. Standard Form 273, Standard Form 274 & Standard Form 275. This is the United States District Court.

There is another set of Bonds and they are all put out by GSA = General Services Administration. I’m just talking off the top of my head because I have all of this stuff memorized. GSA Form SF24 is the “Bid Bond”, everyone should have a copy of the Bid Bond. The “Performance Bond” is SF25. The “Payment Bond” is SF25A and put out by the GSA.

O.K. So, what are they doing with these Bonds? What’s going on in the courtroom is that they are suing you for a debt collection. If you look at these Bonds, everyone of these Bonds: the “Bid Bond”, the “Performance Bond” & the “Payment Bond”, all have a “PENAL SUM” attached to it. The reason for the “Penal Sum” is if you don’t pay the Debt, you go into “Default Judgment”.

That is what is going on in the courtroom. That is why all of these guys are sitting in prison wondering what’s going on! If you go in and argue jurisdiction or refuse to answer questions that the judge or the court addresses to you, they will find you in contempt of court and they will put you in jail. What they do is arrest you, then they hold you, basically until the suit has been completed. Once they get “Default Judgment” on you because of your failure to pay the Debt, they put you in prison. Theattorneys are there to create a smoke screen.

What attorneys have been trained to do is to lead you into “Dishonor” or “Default Judgment”. Then the court puts you into prison then they sell your “Default Judgment”.

Who do they sell it to?

Believe it or not, the U.S. District Court buys all of these State Court Judgments. I don’t know why noone has found this out before. There are about 300 “re-insurance” companies that buy these bonds. They are all ‘insurance” companies. These are the people that are buying these Bonds when you went into “Default Judgment” and they cannot buy these Bonds unless they are Certified by the Secretary of the Treasury.

What are they doing with these Bonds? They have regulations governing these Bonds – there are 2,000 regulations governing these Bonds.

Commercial Paper; Negotiable Instruments - anything you put your signature on is a Negotiable Instrument under the Uniform Commercial Code which is the Lex Mercantorium. Its Mercantile Civil Law.

The reason they use Lex Merchantorium in the court room is because everyone of you are Merchant’s at Law and Merchants at Law is anyone who holds themselves out to be an expert.Because you use commercial paper on a daily basis, you are considered to be an ‘expert’. This is also why they are not telling you what is really going on in the courtroom. You are presumed to know this stuff because you hold yourself out to be an expert by using commercial paper every day.


Every time you put your signature on a piece of paper, you are creating a Negotiable Instrument. Some are Non-Negotiable and some are Negotiable. Every time you endorse something, you are acting as an accommodation party or an accommodation maker under UCC 3-419.

An accommodation party is anyone who loans their signature to another party. Read UCC 3-419, it tells you what an accommodation maker is and what an accommodation party is. When you loan your signature to them, they can then re-write your signature on any document they want and that’s exactly what they are doing.

What the Federal Courts are doing is they are buying up these state court default judgments, called ‘criminal cases’ to cover up what they are doing. Actually, they are civil cases.

If you read “Clerk’s Praxis”, you find that what they call ‘criminal’ is all civil, they just call it criminal to cover up what their doing. If you don’t pay the debt you go to prison, bottom line.

I know I’ve been there. EVERYBODY IS FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM: ALL OF THE MAJOR CORPORATIONS ARE FEEDING OFF OF THE PRISON SYSTEM.

How many of you have heard of REIT = Real Estate Investment Trust or PZN which means Prison Trust? Prisoners are real estate? They own all the real estate because they hold the Bonds on them. You haven’t redeemed your Bond, so they didn’t close your account.



Here’s what goes on: A contractor comes in or any corporation could come in and tender a Bid Bond to the US District Court and they buy up these court judgments and anytime you issue a Bid Bond there has to be a reinsure. So they get a Reinsurance Company to come in and act as Surety for the Bid Bond, then they bring in a Performance Bond. All of these Bonds; Bid, Payment & Performance are all Surety Bonds and anytime you issue a Bid Bond it has to have a Surety guaranteeing or reinsuring the Bid Bond via issuing a Performance Bond.

Then they get an underwriter and that would be either an Investment Broker or an Investment Banker. They come in and underwrite the Performance Bond which is reinsuring the Bid Bond.

What does the underwriter do with the Performance Bond? The underwriter takes the 3 Bonds and pools them and creates what is known as Mortgaged Backed Securities. When you pool these MBS, they are called BONDS and are sold to a company called TBA, which is the Bond Market Association - this is an actual Corporation.

These converted Bonds, now MBS’ are investment securities and being sold the international level. CCA is one of the tickers on the NY Stock Exchange. Others include; CWX, CWD & CWG. When it goes to Frankfurt = CWG, when it goes to Berlin = CWD and so on.

Remember, everything is commercial. 7211 7 CFR says that all crimes are commercial. If you read that carefully it says kidnapping, robbery, extortion, murder, etc. are all  commercial crimes. Thus, you are funding the whole enchilada simply because you got into Default Judgment when you went into court and failed to redeem the Bond.

This is why people don’t win in court; cause they don’t redeem the Bond. You are the Principal upon which all money circulates, but you don’t want to start arguing with the court about that.

They are drafting you for performance. So, anytime the court asks you to do something they are drafting you for performance and if you don’t perform, you get into dishonor by non acceptance.They are making a formal presentment under 3-501 of the UCC so they can charge you and they USE the word “charge”. They use the same commercial words on your Indictment, Information and Complaint. They use the word “charge”, i.e., “the following charges”, “…he has two counts of charges”, etc.

Be as gentle as a dove and wise as a serpent. You can’t act like an insurgent or belligerent. If you do, they will treat you like one; they’ll beat you up.

What you want to do is settle the account…go to full settlement and closure; you’re running the account, you’re the Fiduciary Trustee over the account – tell them what to do. You’re the Principal and owner of the account, tell them what to do – tell them you want full settlement and closure of the account. You have to do this from the get-go.

In order to win in court you have to redeem the Bond.

Here is where to begin: Start with what we call a conditional acceptance.

With the conditional acceptance you can say: “I’m more than happy to give you my name, if you can show that charging papers have been put into the court record. I have not seen any papers that show any charges exist.”

That’s a “Negative Averment”. What you are doing is rebutting the presumption that they have charges against you. They work off presumptions.  They don’t have to have anything. You must rebut their presumptions.

I went down there and asked them for the Bid Bond. I said I want the Bid Bond back. I asked for full settlement and closure of the account. It’s your money that they create and the same thing is going on in the Banks and with these Bonds - they monetize these Bonds.

Then ask for legal counsel. The reason why you have to have an attorney, and I cannot emphasize this too strongly, is because the attorney while in a courtroom is they are working on the public side and you are working on the private side. The court cannot talk to you except through your attorney. You need a mouth piece; a microphone. That is what attorneys are - a mouthpiece. Everyone on the Public side is insolvent and bankrupt. You are not.

This is situation is called a Fiction-of-Law. They will not allow you to defeat this “Fiction-Of-Law”. Why? In Admiralty Maritime Law everything is colorable. It has the appearance of being real but is not real.

They will appoint legal counsel for you. You then instruct the attorney that you are doing a “LETTER OF ROGATORY” or letter of advice. This is also called an “Acceptance for Honor” and you want an accounting of what the total amount of the Bill is post settlement and closure of this account.

Then you give your CUSIP and AUTOTIS number and your case number.

Here’s the wording you use: “I accept your charge(s) for Value and Consideration in return for Post Settlement and Closure of Case # , account# 123-45-6789 [put down your 9 digit social security number] and put down CUSIP# [your ssn] & AUTOTRIS# [your ssn w/o dashes]. Please us my exemption for full settlement and closure of this account as this account is prepaid and exempt from levy. (Date it and endorse it as the Authorized Representative.)

(AUTOTRIS means Automated Tracking Identification System. This is the same as your social security number without the dashes. When I said that they didn’t even want to talk to me…when you sayCUSIP & AUTOTRIS they know exactly what you’re talking about. CUSIP is The COMMITTEE ON UNIFORM SECURITIES IDENTIFICATION PROCESSES. . CUSIP uses your Social Security Number to identify you because the Birth Certificate is a Security. It is an investment security and they have all the original Birth Certificates which are registered at the State level with the Department of Human Recourses and then they go to the Department of Commerce and the Federal level and then to the DTC (Depository Trust Corporation).


Judges and lawyers don’t understand commercial law. They do not teach commercial law at law school.They have a special school for them and it’s on a “need to know” basis. The law always assumes that you know, since you were doing this since you were born until you reach the age of accountability, which is 18 years of age or what they call adulthood. If your holding yourself out and using commercial paper on a daily basis, that legal definition makes you an expert or you wouldn’t be using it, so they presume that when you go into the courtroom you know all this stuff.


They have to give you an out. Whenever you create a liability, you always have to create a remedy. They’re on the Public side of the accounting ledger. You are on the Private side.

You have an account and your account is a “Demand Deposit” account and you are insured by the FDIA and the FDIC. The “Federal Depository Insurance Act” which insures the FDIC which is the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation under Title 12; they have a $10 Million Dollar Policy on you and YOU’RE WORTH MORE DEAD THAN YOU ARE ALIVE.

THEY WILL NEVER TELL YOU THIS STUFF!!


NOTE: All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors. Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment.  Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested.  It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in!  This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.

Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust.  The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.

The public is encouraged to purchase all kinds of insurance protection when the TRUST actually pays for all physical damages; medical costs; new technology and death benefits.  The hype to purchase insurance is a ploy to keep us in poverty and profit off our stupidity because the Vatican owns the controlling interest in all Insurance Companies.


You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST.  Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time.  Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them.  If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it?  A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due.  Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.

TOP THINGS THE POLICE DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW

Did you know that if you sue for false arrest (or false imprisonment), the arrest is presumed to be false?

Did you know that all you need to prove is that the arrest occurred, and then the burden is on the officer to prove that it wasn’t false?

Did you know that for an imprisonment, all you need is to show that you were "restrained of your liberty by words and acts which you feared to disregard"?

Did you know that a car stop counts as an arrest and an imprisonment?

Did you know that if an officer says he has a warrant for your arrest, you can demand to see the warrant AND the supporting affidavit, and if he arrests you without producing them, it’s a false arrest?

Did you know that the police routinely ignore and violate this law?

Did you know that "sovereign immunity" only covers "discretionary" acts (where the officer has a choice about what to do) but does not cover "ministerial" acts such as executing an arrest warrant?

Do you understand that an officer is personally liable for any misdeeds during a warrant arrest?

Did you know that sovereign immunity does not cover an officer AT ALL if he breaks the law?

Did you know that many court documents are "signed" with a rubber stamp?

Did you know that many clerks and attorneys have these stamps with a judge’s signature?
How do you know the warrant wasn’t stamped by a clerk or attorney?
How can a rubber-stamp signature on a warrant POSSIBLY be legal?

Did you know that you can ask an officer for his business card and ID, and if he doesn’t comply, he’s out of uniform?

Did you know you have the right to resist a false arrest with as much force as necessary?

Did you know that if an officer misbehaves, you can complain to Risk Management?
Did you know that the Federal Pure Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act (that set up the FDA) makes it illegal for anyone but a licensed physician to operate a breathalyzer?

Did you know that if an officer asks you a question, you have the right to ignore him and keep walking?


TOP QUESTIONS TO ASK AN FBI AGENT

Are you a "Special Agent" ?

Are there any "General Agents" in the FBI?

When you tell me you are a "Special Agent," are you telling me that you have only specific, limited authority, and that I am responsible for finding out what the limits to your authority are? Am I responsible for making sure you stay within the limits of your authority, even if you are unaware of what those limits are? Please show me documentation of your authority. Is it true that the authority of an FBI agent is the same as the authority of a Park Ranger?

Did you swear an "Oath of Office" ?

Please show me a copy of it. If you violate your Oath of Office, what are the consequences to you? How are those consequences enforced? Do I have to complain to your superiors, or sue you, or what? What is the name of your superior? What is your badge number? Are you authorized to use an alias? How can I serve process on you if I don't know your real name?

When you took office, did you file a bond? Is there any liability insurance to cover damage that you cause while on duty?

Please show me a copy of the insurance policy.

Are you here on campus as an "invitee" or as a "licensee" ? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you are injured while here? How does that affect the liability of the Trustees if you cause damage? Which program are you here under: Applicant, Civil Rights, Counterterrorism, Financial Crime, Foreign Counterintelligence, Organized Crime/Drug, or Violent Crimes and Major Offenders?

Is it true that if you arrest me, and I sue you for false arrest (also false imprisonment, assault, battery, and kidnapping), the only thing I need to prove is that an arrest occurred, and then the burden is on you to show that it wasn't false? Would I sue you in State or Federal court? Why? Is it true that "imprisonment" includes "restraining me of my liberty by words and acts which I fear to disregard" ? Is it true that you can conduct a warrantless arrest only if you witness a felony or a breach of the peace, the same as any citizen? Please show me documentation of any other powers of arrest.

What is the Constitutional authority for the FBI to exist? Is it true that the "police power" means the power to protect the health, safety, morals, and welfare of the public? Is it true that the police powers are reserved to the States under the 10th Amendment? How can you call yourself "law enforcement" if you're not exercising the police power? Is it true that the only Federal crimes (under Article I of the Constitution) are counterfeiting, piracy and treason? If you're not exercising police powers, and you're not a standing army, then what are you?

Is it true that Congress technically ceased to exist during the Civil War, by adjourning "sine die" ("without day")? Is this the reason that Congress has not used the Constitutionally mandated procedure for admitting any States to the Union since 1859?

Is this the reason Senators and Representatives are not actually sworn in during "swearing-in" ceremonies? Is this the reason the President calls the Congress into session every two years? Why two years? Is it because the salaries of Congress fall under the two-year limit on military appropriations?

Are there geographical limits to your authority? Please show me documentation of those limits. Are you authorized to operate in one of the 10 Federal "Regions" ? What is the Constitutional authority for the Nixon-era creation of those "Regions" ? How can the Federal government create "Regions" if it is forbidden to create States? Was it done through emergency or martial-law powers? Isn't "Region" a military word?

Do you have any reason to believe that any of us are engaging in interstate commerce?

Do you know that any mention of the “interstate commerce clause” in any court, by the Prosecution or the Plaintiff, brings the Constitution into evidence and I am free to use it OR object on the grounds that the Constitution has not been entered into evidence.

Do you know Lon Horiuchi, who shot Vicki Weaver while she was holding a baby in her arms (in the infamous Ruby Ridge incident), all over a shotgun that was a quarter of an inch too short? Do you know the agent who shot 14-year-old Sammy Weaver in the back as he tried to run home?

Did you have any part in the Waco massacre (in which the FBI used CS gas and its flammable propellant, in a surprise attack with no element of surprise)? Isn't CS gas illegal to use in war? Did you help destroy evidence from Waco? Is it true that the U.S. Marshals Service falsely claimed a possible drug problem with the Weavers at Ruby Ridge in order to get military reconnaissance flights over the cabin? (and the "hot spot" from the alleged drug lab turned out to be a doghouse?) And that the bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms invented a phony drug nexus at Waco in order to obtain massive assistance from the U.S. Army, the Texas National Guard, and the Alabama National Guard? Is it true that civilian agencies routinely obtain free military support by lying about drugs, and because there is no sanction for lying, obvious falsehoods are accepted by the military as a pretext for intervention? Is it true that the infamous FBI Hostage Rescue Team has spent considerable time in recent years holding hostages and has not even attempted to rescue a hostage for several years? Why are there 56 FBI SWAT teams and what's that got to do with investigation?

Is it true that almost the entire Waco operation, not only 2/28 but the siege, had been improperly financed from money that law enforcement was supposed to use only in the war on drugs?

Have you had any military training? Are you connected in any way to military intelligence? How come you're not covered by the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which was passed to outlaw the use of federal troops for civilian law enforcement and which made it a felony to willfully use "any part of the Army . . . to execute the laws" ?

Is it true that during the 1930s J. Edgar Hoover, director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, falsely told the American people that an unprecedented wave of child kidnappings was in progress, and the FBI was rewarded with substantial attention and funding, and in the 1980s a very different FBI earned itself more funding by putting out phony claims about a wave of serial killers of children?

Is it really a federal crime to transport artificial teeth into a state without the approval of a local licensed dentist, with penalty of up to one year in prison? Is this the sort of thing we pay the FBI to investigate?

Is it true that the federal courts have virtually taken over such vital state functions as the operation of prisons and mental hospitals? And that by 1993, the federal courts operated 80 percent of all state prison systems in America? Is it true that federal judges determine virtually every detail of these prisons, including standards for food and clothing, grievance procedures, and cell space per convict? Is it true that these prisons are run by private corporations for profit?

Checks on Closed Accounts.

In return for the loans from the people, the UNITED STATES keeps track of these loans from the people by tracking the "contributions" of the strawmen- i.e. the corporate shadows of the people, by way of what the UNITED STATES calls the Social Security Number accounts. Since all donations (or loans) of commercial assets from the people to the UNITED STATES are accounted for by way of the SSN accounting, the UNITED STATES knows at any one time how much it owes the ultimate creditors, the living people. Most people believe that the SSN was created to enslave the people by making them takers of benefits. This is false (unless you want it to be true and demand benefits from the UNITED STATES). Everything from the BANKRUPT public under public policy and not under public law is told to us in reverse or backwards. The creation of the SSN accounts was not to make us a nation of slaves. It was to allow the government to take our commercial energy and use it to run the nation, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each and everyone of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. Therefore, the SSN was to track our claims against the UNITED STATES. We are the creditors and they are the debtor. Therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES since we are the creditors and it is the debtor.



The CAFR accounting is the summary results of this accounting of keeping track of the people's contributions and earnings on those contributions. There are two accounts. The one account is the accounting of the first tier contributions. This is the property contributed to the UNITED STATES from the people of the states by way of the acts of the governors of the states in March of 1933. The larger asset account is most likely the earnings off of the commercial investment of the assets contributed to the first account. This second dealing with the investment earnings is most likely a tontine account belonging to the people, as long as they are alive to claim it. After their death, their share of this account is probably estopped with their probate.



Living people loan or contribute credits to the UNITED STATES when they own property and register it, or when they have income and file a tax return. You are in commerce when you have income (i.e.- you sell the labor of the living man for private money) or when you are an "owner" of registered property. Title 31 United States Code §3124 is interesting. It is titled "Exemption from Taxation." This statute says in effect that you are not exempt from taxation under Title 26 of the United States Code if you sell your labor or if you own property that is registered to any state or the united states. Notice that Title 31 of the United States Code is the laws concerning "money". Since there is no public law money now, and only private money of the private Federal Reserve Bank, then there is no ability to purchase any titles to any property anymore. Since there is no ability to purchase titles to property anymore with the private Federal Reserve Notes, then one's "ownership" or property or the sale of one's labor for private "money" has no lawful title transferred in the exchange. Therefore one is always dealing with a "federal" property right in any "ownership" or in any "sale of labor for ‘money". Since one is dealing in a property right of Congress (since they enfranchised the Federal Reserve Bank), then one who sells his labor for "money" or owns property is nothing more than a tenant on the federal feudal plantation and is NOT tax exempt from the statutes of Title 26 mentioned in Title 31 §3124 and being outside the exemption. The tax is the rent for the use of the federal feudal property held by the UNITED STATES in trust for the people and franchised to the federal 14th amendment fictions and corporations to raise a revenue for the democracy.



There is a court case that says the same thing. It is backward to reality, but the truth is there anyway. The agents of the court speak as the agents of YHWH to His people, if they will listen. Scripture says in 1 Cor 13:12: For Now [in the later days] we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part: but then shall I know even as also I am known,' The "glass" is a mirror that inverts the direction from left to right. "Darkly" is the modifier that suggests that the image from the mirror is not easily discernible even when it is in reverse. The Court case is from the UNITED STATES Supreme Court. "If the nation [the man] comes down from its [his] position of sovereignty and enters the domain of commerce, it [he] submit itself [himself] to the same laws that govern individuals therein. It [he] assumes the position of an ordinary citizen and it [he] cannot recede from the fulfillment of its [his] obligations;" 74 Fed. Rep. 145, following 91 U.S. 398. Notice that the words in the brackets have been added by the writer. It is not in the original decision. This case was a commercial case in which the sovereignty of the United States was draw into question. The Supreme Court said that when a sovereign goes into a commercial relationship with private money [not lawful money of account], it looses its sovereignty. The Supreme Court was telling you that we all lost our sovereignty in 1933 when we went into commerce with private FRN's that did not secure title to the goods purchased. Title remained with the "state" under the principle of escheat. The only way to remain sovereign is to be out of commercial activity.



It is interesting that there is something called a COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY EXCEPTION. Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh, states: the - term "commercial-activity exception means: "An exemption from the rule of sovereign immunity, permitting a claim against a foreign state if the claim arises from private acts undertaken by the foreign state, as opposed to the state's public acts." Isn't this definition exactly what we said above. If you are in commerce since 1933, you are not a sovereign. You are not free. Prior to 1933, you could perform a "public act" of "paying" for goods and services with lawful money of account. In 1933 that "public act" was suspended by federal public policy of the bankruptcy. Now all one can do is to use a "private act" of discharging your debt with FRN's, which are not a money and do not purchase a title for the goods and services you bought. Therefore, none of your acts are cloaked with the protection of a "sovereign" anymore. You lost your presumption of "sovereignty" because of your participation in private commercial activity.



Let me put this a different way. It comes out the same in the end. The UNITED STATES has been bankrupt from the beginning. It has only been in various stages of bankruptcy going from bad to worse. The Constitution was the first indicator. If you look up the word "constitution", it will give you all kinds of comfy-cozy stuff. It will make you feel good about this "founding document". If you look up the word "constitutor" you will get a changed opinion. A "constitutor" is one who passes on his debts to another by way of the constitution he writes, so it was with the UNITED STATES. It owed the debts of the Revolutionary War back in the 1770's. The States would not tax themselves to pay these debts. Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, borrowed money from the international bankers to pay these war debts. The Constitution was the means of getting the States to coinsure the UNITED STATES in order to get an extension in paying back the loan to the creditors at the end of the 1780's. The States became endorsers and co-sureties on the national loan. This cosurety was called in in 1933 when the assets of the States were turned over to the UNITED STATES to help discharge the bankruptcy. This was done because of the Constitution of the United States and pursuant thereto.



If you do not believe this, then I will give you another issue to consider. There is a principle called the Rule of 93. It relates to the Rule of 1793 under International Law. "Where a commerce which had previously been considered a monopoly is thrown open, in times of war, to all nations, by a general regulation neutrals have no right to avail themselves of the concession, and their entrance on such trade is a breach of the impartiality they are bound to observe." 2 Halleck, mt. L. 302. This rule came into existence between the Treaties of 1783 and 1794, more commonly termed the Treaty of Peace and the Jay Treaty. The first Treaty of Peace signed in July 16, 1792 recognized the debt that Congress had with the bankers of the Crown of England payable by Jan. 1, 1788, but defaulted on by Congress. This Rule of 93 states that anyone who acts in a commercial manner with one who is a debtor to another, is no longer a neutral party and stands in the place of the debtor.



This is the source of our problem today, people. The UNITED STATES and all the states are codebtors to the bankers. We, the people, were never linked directly with the obligation to discharge the debt. But when we go into a commercial activity with private "money" with the debtors the UNITED STATES and the territorial Buck Act States, then we are no longer neutral, under law, and we have come into breach of the impartiality in the commercial relationship between the UNITED STATES and its Buck Act States and the international creditor banks. By our co-commercial activity under private acts of commerce by using private credit and debt, we have become the debtors by our actions. The only solution is to get out of commerce with private federal "money".



This is where the "closed check" account becomes interesting. When the account is closed, one can access the asset side of the admiralty-maritime pre-paid account. If one cannot access the asset side, then one cannot acquire the right of the creditor to the action. The liability side is the evidence of a debt. A debtor has no remedy in an action. Dealing with open checking accounts is reserved is for "dead" entities who have no original energy. If you are a living soul, you are the source of the energy used by commerce. You are the creditor or the principle.



There is NO MONEY. It was discontinued by an act of Congress in 1933. All we have is the PROMISE to deliver money, if and when it is ever restored, which President Johnson said would never be restored again. If you believe that there is money, then you are a fool and live in a fiction as a lunatic. There are things that some people want you to believe is used "as a money". If money existed, you would not need to have "notes" and promises to pay money. How can the promise to pay money be the money you think you are getting?



The long and short is simple. You never PAY anyone any money. You hand them a due bill to promise to pay them something which does not now exist and to which those in power will not sanction. The reason is simple. If you do not have money, you can not acquire a title to any property. Therefore, all property rests in the hands of the fictitious state which owns everything and you must get permission from the state to do whatever you desire to do. This is called a democracy which is run on the commercial principles of socialism [or communism]. We, as a nation, were taken over in March, 1933, and not one citizen or slave was the wiser and objected. But who cares? The reason was stated in Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26.



The reason for our nation's current condition is not relevant to this discussion. We are interested in the problem of the woman, who in the start of this article, was involved with a visit from the FBI to inquire about why she was using closed checks on a closed checking account.



A closed account in a bank is one which allows one to go back to draft the UNITED STATES to protest the lack of remedy to the loss of Constitutional money. It requests the use of "public" policy to remedy your loss of lawful money as a living people and as a creditor of the commercial bankruptcy. By drafting with a closed account check, used in a proper manner, one can notice the Secretary of the Treasury that you request a "public act" of settlement of an account someone might charge you with under "private acts" of public policy. Using the closed check properly actually puts one in harmony with the principles of HJR 192 as set forth by Congress in 1933 as the remedy for the "creditors", or we the people. You are NOT using the closed check to purchase anything. There is no money. You are involved in an exchange. An exchange is an action between two parties where goods or services are neither bought or sold and are not gifted. Remember, there is a tax or a lawful penalty on gifting or buying and selling when the commercial system is run under foreign private acts or laws. This is the penalty stated in the Rule of 1793 whereby traders in commerce with the debtors are also treated like the debtors and lose all titles and property rights not granted by letters of Marquee (licenses and registrations), to which the party in commerce never has lawful title. He is merely a beneficiary to an implied trust with the "state" as the lawful trustee with the right of control.



When the woman in our example used a closed account check to tender a charge, she was not paying the charge. There is no money. It is a fiction and illusion to assume there is. She was merely telling the so called charging party that if they want to believe there is money, or if they want to believe that there is a charge against her straw-woman, then she will not argue with them. Why would you argue with an insane person who believes that there is money when Congress told everyone there wasn't in 1933. To argue with a lunatic who believes that there is money and that they can charge you to try to collect money which does not exist, is to become a lunatic yourself. The test in this scenario is that the controllers for the government at the high level know there is no money. They test you to see if you believe that there is still money. If you are with them that you do not owe MONEY, then you are the one who raised the factual issue of MONEY, and you must be a lunatic. Their judgments against you for money is another test to see if they can appease you, since you obviously think money exists.



So lets figure this out. If you argue about a debt payable in money, such as a civil or criminal charge against you, then you are a lunatic since you appear to believe that money exists, which since 1933 is not true. You must be crazy. If you "accept" any alleged charges that they imply are related to money [like civil and criminal charges and other commercial presentments], and you never raise the issue of money at all, since it is a fiction and illusion and you do not deal with, talk about, or argue things that are illusions and fictions, then you pass the test from the public, and you just might escape any serious judgments for criminal or civil liabilities that will be thrown at your strawman.



The way that you get out of commerce and do not use money is to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to offset and adjust any charges against your strawman by the use of an "exemption" by way of a PRE-PAID account, which links back to the CAFR accounting and your share of the living man's work energy donated to the state by way of the loans of work energy and property donations through registrations by the strawman. This PRE-PAID account has no money in it currently. It was prepaid when you authorized the state to become the trustee over it as an unselfish act of honor and duty. Since the Secretary of the Treasury is the fiduciary creditor to operate that account according to your draft, the Secretary of the Treasury is the only person who could enter a Certificate of Protest to your draft instrument seeking settlement and closure of any charge that the state might bring against your strawman as a test of your competency as a sovereign. Sovereignty means to serve, not to rule.

How to Attach and Perfect a Security Interest Under the UCC

A secured transaction is a loan or purchase that is secured by collateral. It involves a borrower or buyer, technically known as the debtor, and a lender or seller, technically known as a creditor, and more specifically known as a secured party. Common secured transactions include a bank loaning a business money so the business can buy inventory, or a company selling a business equipment on credit. In these transactions, the business is the debtor, the bank or the selling company is the creditor, and, most likely, the inventory or equipment will be at least part of the collateral.
Under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which covers secured transactions, in order for a creditor to become a secured party—that is, a party with a legal right to take possession of collateral in the event of the debtor’s failure to pay—the creditor must take special steps. These steps are known asattachment of a security interest. Moreover, in order for a secured party to more fully ensure its legal rights in the event that other parties are asserting an interest in the same piece of collateral, the secured party must take additional steps. These additional steps are known as perfecting a security interest. Here we’ll look at both attachment and perfection of security interests.
Attachment
A creditor has a security interest in collateral, and becomes a secured party, if and when a security interest “attaches.” Under the UCC, a security interest generally does not attach unless three basic requirements are met. In simplest form, the requirements are that:
value be given for the security interest
the debtor has rights in the collateral (or power to transfer the collateral to a secured party); and
the debtor “authenticates” a security agreement.
Let’s briefly look at each of these requirements.
Value. A secured transaction is a contract between the debtor and the secured party. Like most contracts, there must be an exchange of consideration between the parties. In other words, there must be an exchange of value. In the case of secured transactions, the value given by the secured party is usually obvious. For example, a bank gives value to a debtor when, in conjunction with a security agreement, it loans money to the debtor to buy inventory. Similarly, a seller gives value to a debtor when, in conjunction with a security agreement, it sells equipment to the debtor.
Debtor’s rights in collateral. A business may have rights in collateral either by owning the collateral prior to the secured transaction or by purchasing the collateral as part of a secured transaction. When a business already owns certain property, it should be clear that the business has rights in that property, and can use it as collateral. In other cases, a business will buy items (materials, inventory, machinery and so on) on credit and want to use those same items as collateral. In such cases, the business will sign a conditional sales contract, which is also considered a security agreement, and which, under UCC sales rules, will give the business the necessary rights in the purchased items to use them as collateral. (Note: the alternative option of having the “power to transfer” the collateral often involves relatively unusual circumstances and is not covered here.)
Security agreement. For purposes of attachment, the debtor must “authenticate” a security agreement. In other words, the debtor must sign the agreement. (The UCC uses the term “authenticate” to include the possibility of electronic signatures.) A security agreement normally will contain a clear statement that the debtor is granting the secured party a security interest in specified goods. The agreement also must provide a description of the collateral. Section 9-108 of the UCC indicates generally that a description of collateral is sufficient “if it reasonably identifies what is described.” The same section then goes on to provide a half-dozen different possibilities for a reasonable identification, such a “specific listing,” a “category,” or a “quantity.” While the description of collateral in a security agreement may not need to be finely detailed, the UCC prohibits descriptions of collateral that are “supergeneric,” such as “all the debtor’s assets” or “all the debtor’s personal property.”
The UCC recognizes that some security agreements are quite complex, and, therefore, has various special rules regarding certain possible agreement terms. To take just one example, a security agreement may include a clause that the collateral is to include property that the debtor acquires after the agreement is signed. For the most part, the UCC allows parties to use “after-acquired property” as collateral; however, the UCC does not allow after-acquired consumer goods to serve as collateral.
The three requirements of: giving value, debtor rights in the collateral, and an authenticated security agreement apply to the most common types of collateral, such as equipment, inventory and even payments due under a contract. However, for certain less common types of collateral, the requirements relating to an authenticated security agreement may vary.

Perfection

A secured party perfects a security interest in order to help assure that no other party, such as another creditor or a bankruptcy trustee, will be able to claim the same collateral in the event that the debtor becomes insolvent. By perfecting its security interest, a secured party seeks to gain priority over other parties regarding the collateral.
The precise details of how to perfect a security interest depend in part on the local jurisdiction where the collateral is located. However, generally speaking, the primary ways for a secured party to perfect a security interest are:by filing a financing statement with the appropriate public office
by possessing the collateral by “controlling” the collateral; or it's done automatically upon attachment of the security interest.
Of these four listed items, the first--filing a financing statement--is by far the most common and important to understand.

Financing statement. Security interests for most types of collateral are usually perfected by filing a document known simply as a financing statement. The purpose of the financing statement, which is filed with a public office such as the Secretary of State, is to put other people on notice of the secured party’s security interest in the collateral. The UCC specifies what must be contained in a financing statement:
the name of the debtor the name of the secured party; and an indication of the collateral.

Regarding the first of these items, it is important that the name of the debtor be sufficiently specific and accurate, because financing statements are filed under the debtor’s name. If the name on the statement is wrong, the statement will fail to provide adequate notice to others, and will not succeed in perfecting the security interest. Section 9-503 of the UCC provides various, more specific rules regarding the sufficiency of a debtor’s name on a financing statement. For example, if the debtor is a “registered organization,” which might mean a corporation or limited liability company organized under a particular state’s law, then the name on the financing statement must match the name of the debtor as registered with the state. The second required item on the statement, the name of the secured party, is generally a straightforward matter. Finally, as to the third item, the rules for indication of collateral on the financing statement are largely the same as for the description of collateral on a security agreement (see above). However, unlike with a security agreement, on a financing statement it is acceptable to use a “supergeneric” description of collateral.

A standard form, known as Form UCC-1, is widely used by secured parties to file a financing statement. You can easily find a sample UCC-1 online. While many financing statements must be filed with the Secretary of State, you should check your own state’s laws for more information. As a final point, be aware that a financing statement can be, and sometimes is, filed before a security interest has attached; creditors do this in anticipation of creating a security interest, in order to make sure that the interest is perfected immediately upon attachment.
Possession. A security interest in many types of collateral, including “negotiable documents, goods, instruments, money, or tangible chattel paper,” may be perfected by the secured party possessing the collateral. However, so-called “intangible” collateral, such as accounts receivable, cannot be perfected by possession. While “possession” is not directly defined by the UCC in this context, it does appear to include possession not only by the secured party but also by an agent of the secured party.
Control. The UCC states that, “A security interest in investment property, deposit accounts, letter-of-credit rights, or electronic chattel paper may be perfected by control of the collateral . . . .” The meaning of “control” can vary depending on which type of collateral is involved. For example, a secured party may have control of a deposit account if the bank, the debtor and the secured party have all agreed that the secured party may handle the funds in that account “without further consent by the debtor.” As another example, a secured party has control over investment property, such as securities (shares of stock or the like), if the property is delivered to the secured party, and, if necessary, “endorsed” (signed) to the secured party.

Automatically upon attachment. The most important type of security interest that is perfected immediately upon attachment is what is known as a purchase-money security interest (PMSI) in consumer goods. A PMSI generally involves either: (1) a debtor buying an item on credit from a seller where the seller will be the secured party; or (2) a debtor using a loan from a bank directly to buy an item from a seller, where the bank will be the secured party. When the debtor in one of these circumstances is buying consumer goods, the secured party (seller or bank) does not need to file a financing statement in order to perfect the security interest. Note, however, that, while it may not be necessary to file a financing statement, not all security interests in PMSIs in consumer goods are perfected upon attachment. For example, some statutes governing certificates of title, such as for cars, require that a security interest be indicated on the certificate in order for the interest to be perfected. Finally, be aware that the UCC states that perfection occurs automatically upon attachment for about a dozen other relatively unusual types of collateral. (For more information, check UCC Section 9-309.)
Having covered the main ways to perfect a security interest, it is important to note that there may be situations where a secured party with a perfected security interest would still have that interest subordinated to some other party. However, in most cases, perfecting a security interest provides very substantial protection of that interest.
Final Note
This article is based on the current version of the model Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). However, not all states have adopted all sections of the current model UCC. Moreover, the model UCC specifically leaves it to individual states to determine the precise wording of certain sections. Therefore, you should always check your own state’s commercial code for the most accurate information.

Do you own a home? A car? Do you have a credit card or a student loan?

Well, all of these different types of debt began with you filling out a promissory note (a contract). When this is submitted to the bank, and after an “approval process”, you receive that money by signing this contract. And the bank tells you quite dishonestly that you owe them a debt for that amount of money, and gives you permission to amortize the payment of that loan over a set amount of time, usually 30 years for a mortgage. But, they also charge you interest for this convenient “service”. That means that by the end of those 30 years you’ll probably have paid double if not triple what the actual loan amount was at the signing of the original contract (promissory note).

But there is one thing that the bank is not telling you. One very, very big piece of the puzzle…

Are you ready?

According to the Federal Reserve banks, and printed in their banking rulebooks, money is created when a person (you) signs a contract (promissory note) with a bank.

Huh…?

Let me explain…

Last year I remember hearing about a campaign to protect people from foreclosure by these banks and mortgage companies called “Show Me The Note!” At the time, I did not understand the significance of this simple but effective and protective statement. Now I do…
“Show Me The Note” is quite a valid request. It simply means that you are requesting the original contract (promissory note) that was signed by yourself and the foreclosing bank when the money was created and given to you to buy your home.

But you see… the bank cannot ever produce this note. And here’s why…

The bank sells your note (promissory note or deed) to the Federal Reserve the minute you sign it, and the Fed then gives that bank the amount that it then “loans” to you. Therefore, the bank is at a balance of $0.00 dollars at the point of inception and payment for your loan. Remember, this is how money is “created” according to the Federal Reserve banking rules and regulations.

The problem that these banks have is that they no longer hold the note (title) to your home, because they have already sold it at face value to the Federal Reserve. And in order for a creditor (the bank) to make a claim against the debtor (you), they must in a court of “law” show proof of their claim to collect your supposed debt to them. However, the only proof of their claim for the foreclosure of your home is in fact that original note (promise to pay, promissory note) that you signed, which created the money that enabled the bank to give you that loan in the first place – money out of thin air!

Remember, money is created only when you or I sign a contract to get “credit”. It is the very fact that all of this information is not disclosed to us that makes this contract null and void. Full disclosure must accompany any contract lest it be invalid and unlawful.

Your loan contract was sold to the Federal Reserve (a private corporate central bank) by the bank or mortgage company with whom you signed your contract. It’s gone… vanished… paid off! The Federal Reserve then bundles those deeds (contracts) and sells them as securities and bonds, to countries like China, Russia, and whoever else will buy them. So in essence, China may already own the title to your home, or at least it thinks it does…

And this is why the bank has no lawful grounds to foreclose on you. They do not hold a lawful lean on your home. You owe nothing to anybody! You created that money legally through the bank and Federal Reserve by accessing your trust account assigned to you by the UNITED STATES when they took your freedom and liberty and put your wealth and property at risk starting on the day you were born (birthed).

The principle and interest you pay to the bank is pure profit for the next 30 years, because you signed a contract saying that you would pay that amount with your home and land as collateral. But for a contract to be lawful, there must be full disclosure of these little facts. Since this was obviously not disclosed to you, all of these mortgage and other contracts are null and void. The bank has no contract, no proof of claim against your debt, and no rights to force you to pay them anything.

If this sounds like a copout from paying your bills, remember that the bank never risked anything, and they never gave you a penny of their own money. You did a favor to the banking system by creating new money. You created commerce. Nothing more…

And you are entitled to this money (worthless paper used for commerce) as an indentured citizen of the UNITED STATES who is used as collateral and assigned this value at birth.

And remember… due to the Fractional Reserve Banking System created by the Federal Reserve, the Fed creates 40 times the amount of your “loan” for its use, again making money out of thin air.

I hope that you are beginning to understand that this is another of the biggest scams in the history of scams, and that all bank loans, from credit cards to student loans to mortgages work in this same exact way, secured or unsecured. Again, this is how money is created into the economy, per the rules of the Federal Reserve Bank, the private corporation unaffiliated with our government or our nation, who control our monetary policy and can destroy the value of the dollar at any time the choose.

Do you really feel guilty about reclaiming your piece of the pie?

The only way to truly benefit from this freedom is by declaring your individual God-given rights of sovereignty through a UCC (Universal Commercial Code) filing. You must offset your debt lawfully as afforded you. You must become a Secured Party Creditor.

I cringe when I hear people say they aren’t going to fight the system and instead are going to give up their house. They feel hopeless. They feel like they can’t win…

But the truth is that there was never anything to lose! The bank has no claim!

But, I understand. Most will not buck the system simply because they do not understand the system and how the Constitution for the United States was set up to ensure this type of unlawful action like bank foreclosure can never be done to us. I took me a very long time to come to this comprehension. This is how freedom works, and it only works if you claim it.

This is the forbidden knowledge…

I guess it all boils down to this… What is an education?

If an education is defined as simply four years of partying and getting drunk in a frat house while barely passing the exams of one of the most sub-standard collegial educational systems in the first world (I believe we are 39th on the list) of which most of the information taught is to train us on how to follow these rules instead knowing and learning the actual laws… and if your level of education is defined by the amount of money paid in order to receive a less than prestigious diploma stating grade level and accomplishment… then I am happy to say that I am a college dropout! I am self-educated to the point that normal conversations with doctorate level graduates equate to a conversation with a child who still believes in the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and the Easter Bunny… simply because that is what they are taught in the corporate indoctrination centers that we call schools. Rational thought, self-awareness, and sovereignty is not taught in school. And Law is not the prevailing wisdom in law school.

Then, when you realize that everything you see in the movies, television, and on the news is specifically designed to uphold the illusionary state of unconsciousness that most of us live in regarding our debt slavery, that’s the point where normal conversation as defined by the media driven society becomes unbearable. And fitting in at parties becomes impossible. I’m now the crazy guy… the one talking out of my butt. I’m the one who, despite the beauty, glory, and not to mention the fact of the information I try and relay, I am labeled as the negative one… the downer.

And so now I’m the antisocial one… the one who doesn’t go to parties. The one who cannot do small talk. And I’m the one that cannot keep normal friends simply because normal means brainwashed! And normalcy is not freedom in any way.

The friends I have made are necessarily informed or at least curious, somewhat awake, and want to learn what I have already learned or want to teach what I am seeking to learn. When you do meet these people, you develop a friendship and a trust that is unknown to most; kinship through shared plight.

And to anyone reading this, I have only this to say. I may not know you. You may think that no one really knows you. But I hope that you haven’t reached the point in your life where you’ve given up, where you’ve lost all hope, where learning was something you did as a teenager, and where happiness equates to blissful ignorance. I hope that you wont let these corporate monsters force you to be a victim of this. I hope this reaches you with the spirit it was intended, and I wish for you the best in whatever you do.

A sheep you are not… for you have read this far!

MICRO-PRINT On your Checks

To eliminate credit card debt, you must understand that the debt is not yours personally. Since you began doing money transactions, you've functioned as a voluntary fiduciary representative for a trust account, paying its bills with your own energy. When you set up your first checking account, you accepted this relationship with the trust the government had set up in your name. You have not had control of this trust because you never claimed it and your parents didn't know.

Notice how the "Money System" maintains the illusion. Look at your checkbook. How did they present your name? ALL CAPS. Odd, isn't it? Try to have them CHANGE that to normal capitalization. They CAN'T do it because their computers won't permit that. Bank staff may not be unaware of why. Do they insist on ALL CAPS because they would like to be very clear and allow no mistakes? A clue to that answer is the line on which you sign your name. It's not a line. It's nearly microscopic words, some of the finest fine print you might ever encounter. It generally says something like "ONLY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE." So you the human being has been given authority to sign the checks of your trust, which is an incorporated entity, a fiction. The checking account is not yours.

If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger).

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192
and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in th e Federal
register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold
in the United States . Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23,
1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the
Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933
page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever
known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. . ;" HJR 192 is the
insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the
American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of
the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was poisoned by the powers that be
by agents of that federal corporation.

HlR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bill s. It removed the requirement that the
United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the
inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also
cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to
be paid in gold - retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could
use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the
nonnal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency
used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new
medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a
debtor's creditors to discharge the debtor' s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is
used to discharge public debts. Take 

note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no value, as stated by the Federal Reserve!

In the 1950's the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to their States as a means of
unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with
commercial transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security instruments (commercial
paper) replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by
presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties , could be
used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was disappearing, and
NEW money was being created i.e., 'Money of Account' (created by Bill of Exchange) and a
uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to
uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling
payment or performance (see 'Tender of Payment in your State statute"). All this was
accomplished by the mid 1960' s. And by 1964, most all the States had adopted the Uniform
Commercial Code.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people
engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled
thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated over the years. In the
1900's the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became
a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in
enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their- courts. If the claimants were
required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people,
they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of
dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive
commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers .
The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children,
etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under dictate by the United States, gained control of the
substance through the 'registrations' and the States were able to extract more ' use' taxes, from
the people to use the property of the State! The States and the United States became the Holder
of the titles to all the property, even children and many other things.
The definition of "property" is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The
property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to
the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in
commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the
owners of the 'things.' That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of
paper - titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction . [Watch the movie Last Action
Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes
the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It
is an impossibility!

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a 'constructive' trust for the benefit of
the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate
trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be
commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a
constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be
the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his
remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law,
so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or
charges brought against his public person (Debtor-straw.man} by the United States.
If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund,
or financial ledger). The definition of "fund" is money set aside to 'Pay a debt. The fund \'S there
to discharge the public debts attributed. to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the
accommodating parties - the American people. The national debt IS what is owed is to the
owners of the registered things - the American people, as well as to other creditors!
If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by
accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United
States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get
around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he  agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the
principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have
never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an
accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor's liabilities without getting consideration in
exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree
to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is
easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The presumption that he
is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable
for a tax on the thing he actually owns or owes.

Debtors may have the 'use' of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor
is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the
duties and responsibilities a debtor has . If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor
because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time
convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him . In addition. the
courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make. when
trying to use their remedy.

Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing) , after learning the law and discovering who
he is in relation to the United States Corporation. can file a ucc Financing Statement based
upon a Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the artificial entity
DEBTOR PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United States created after your Mom
signed the 'Root of Title Newborn Identification' and then was compelled to apply for a birth
certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property. her baby (substance). with the
State of . The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until
your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial
entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter - JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files
the Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity
(JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The
ucc and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security
interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The
evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).
The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own
affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill
of Exchange with the Secretary through which he 'charges up the UCC Contract Trust Account,'
in respect to the 'value' expressed on the Birth Certificate and the 'Directive' cover letter. The
social security number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a
charge back, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge.
Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public
person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction,
transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into
the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some
energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill , utility
bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a S amount and JOHN' S name on it as the
presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge
JOHN and put JOHN'S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as
the secured party creditor, having charged up the uce Contract Trust Account, now for the
'presentment' received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or
debt with a negotiable instrument for the same S amount as the charging instrument
(presentment) stipulates. The charging party that receives your noncash item can process it back
through the United States Treasury through their financial institution. Note; if discharging IRS
Tax liability, the package/instrument goes directly to the Secretary of Treasury - U.S.
When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions,
you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure
to disclose material facts to yo u at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of
the thing, but the United States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not
specifically authorize the United StateS/State and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits
made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder.
Legally, all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into
a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be
fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud . If the
scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is,
the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason I F they had not
provided a remedy, which they did . - House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5,1 933. This is their
insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be
charged with treason, but the courts win dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge
of treason. But Tort, now that's another matter!