You can access your account at the U.S. Treasury to eliminate debts

In commerce, though, whoever creates the liability MUST bring the remedy as well. If the sender doesn’t send the funds to "pay” the bill you must accept the bill for the value you gave it when you were born and use your prepaid account to offset the debt the presenter is creating. So it is your choice whether to "offset” the debt with your pre-paid account by accepting the bill for value and sending the bill to the "Paymaster”, the Secretary of the US Treasury, or to the IRS, for adjustment… OR give them the equity from your labor, which is in the form of Federal Reserve Notes, checkbook money or credit card money. Eliminate debt with your prepaid account, of course! Why eliminate debt with your own hard-earned money in "your" bank account when you have money of account waiting for you to access at the US Treasury? Your other account can be tapped through the collection agency called "the IRS”.



You can access your account at the U.S. Treasury to eliminate debts and get a refund of all of the income taxes you paid for the last three years by filing 1040’s, corrected IRS docs that we will submit electronically. You can learn how to call upon the Secretary of the Treasury to do his job: to eliminate debt you incurred by simply adjusting to zero the accounts that you incur in the normal course of doing business with your creditors. That means car payments, credit cards, utilities, taxes, student loans, house payments…. YES all of them. Eliminate debt with your prepaid account at the US Treasury. Do it while there still IS an Internal Revenue Service and a US Treasury.






There have been revisions to the UCC Articles especially IX that states that the UCC Financing Statement of the Secured Party applicant has to be filed in the region or State of their Birth. When the file is recorded with the Secretary of the Treasury it must include a Charge-Back Instruction Notice, a 1040 ES form combined with a Birth Certificate. The Secretary of the Treasury is the other party that holds an Interest. The Secured Party also needs to file a UCC Financing Statement and Addendum with the UCC Office in the State that the person resides in order to protect any property there. People at the Treasury Department Analysis and Control Division of the IRS where they keep the files claim that the birth certificate does not have a Commercial Value. They do however admit that the Certificates of Live Births are real and are kept on file. Others have declared that the Application for the Birth Certificate actually does have a Commercial Value which is determined by the ability of the Government to Tax any Future Earnings of the individual named on the documents. The Applications are not kept on file in D.C. itself, some claim they are filed in Puerto Rico, others claim it is Switzerland.
People who have properly and correctly filed within their Birth State or UCC Region will create a completely separate entity or a Secured Party completely separate from their Government created debtor. When the filing and the Instruction Order (the Chargeback) the IRS 1040 ES form, the AFV stamped Birth Certificate lets the Secretary of the Treasury know that the Secured Party has been created with a prior and superior claim to all the assets and liabilities of the Debtor. (STRAW MAN) These liabilities should be forwarded to the Secretary to be processed and discharged through the UCC Contract Trust.
There is a National UCC Administration which the States, the Protectorates and the District of Columbia had formed. The United States has been partitioned into six UCC Regions. If one of the UCC offices in a particular Region does not accept a properly prepared UCC another office within that Region will. A person can have a Regional Filing recorded within a Region State and have it maintain the same thing as filing within their State of Birth.
It appears that the UCC as well as other paperwork that is required to be filed with the Birth State or Region are all logged in the mail room at 1500 Pennsylvania NW, Washington, D.C.

This is the Address of the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS. The documents are examined by the Secret Service, the FBI and Justice Department. The documents are known at the Analysis and Control Division as "UCC Contract Trusts."


There is a significant difference between UCC Contract Trusts and Direct Treasury Accounts which are used prenominaly for the trading of Treasury Bonds, which are managed by the Bureau of Public Debt. There are many UCC and Bill of Exchange documents that arrive at 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW are mistakenly sent to the BPD. The mistake that many people who file UCC forms makes is a reference to the Treasury Direct or Direct Treasury account within their paperwork. Within the Analysis and Control Division inside the IRS Building in DC, UCC contract Trusts are processed and then the documents are forwarded to one of the two IRS Centers. If you file East of the Mississippi the Documents are sent to Cincinnati, Ohio. If you file West of the Mississipi they forward them to Fresno, California. Your UCC files and documents are going to be scrutinized by the Secret Service, the Justice Department, FBI, then sent to the CID, it is also sent to the IRS Technical Support Division (TSD) within the State that the Secured Party started the discharge.
IRS Technical Support Division (TSD)

Here are some important points to know concerning the administration and purpose of the TSD!

-Almost every single Financial Institution which is connected to the Federal reserve System has registered or contracted access to an account with IRS called a Treasury Tax and Loan account (TTL).

-This TTL account in every Financial Institution is managed through the TSD office which can be found within most of the IRS State Offices. Because of this IRS reconstruction the Technical Support Manager (TSM) in every State Divisional Office of the IRS has been given the same authority once held by the District Director.

-When a Notice of Levy/Lien is delivered to a Financial Institution by the IRS, the Financial Institution simply responds by making an entry in their computer. This simple action transfers the asset from the person who made the Deposit int an IRS TTL account. This means that the Asset never actually physically leaves their office. There are some Financial Institutions that do not maintain a TTL account. They simply hold the funds for twenty one days before transferring the amount directly to the Internal Revenue Service.


-When a Financial Institution receives a "Release of Levy/Lien" from the IRS the Financial Institution makes a simple computer entry and the funds are transferred from the TTL account into the account of the depositor if it is applicable. If a UCC form is prepared properly and filed with the Bank can be an Administrative Obstruction Action in which a Secured Party can use to show a prior and superior claim to those assets on deposit.

-There are certain Banks that will not will accept UCC Documents. Do not use one of these banks but find one that will accept the form and deposit your funds there.

Correct Way To Have Claims Discharged:
The way to correctly have claims discharged with the IRS as well as in the Public Sector using the UCC Contract Trust is to present by the Secured Party a Bonded Registered Bill of Exchange, and this needs to be sent straight to the Secretary of the Treasury. When a claim is made either by the IRS, a federal or state taxing agency. The claim can then have a stamp imprinted upon it stating "Accepted For Value". This needs to be done by the Secured Party and it must be sent through Certified (or Registered) Mail directly to the Secretary of the Treasury to be discharged.

This is documented and authorized through Public Policy:

HJR-192, Title IV, Sec. 401 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Supreme Court’s confirmation in Guaranty Trust of New York vs. Henwood, et al (1939) and Public Law 73-10. Such action is further confirmed in USC Title XII, Title XXVIII, Sec. 1641, 3002 and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.

Getting back to the supposed Value of the Birth Certificate this is the facts as I ascertained them.


The number of Birth Certificates that are referenced in UCC Financing Statements that have been stamped and filed in the state UCC Filing Offices is in the Hundreds of Thousands. Under the revised version of Article (Chapter) IX of the UCC (July 1, 2001) such filers had until June 30, 2002 to refile the UCC-1 within their State of Birth.
 If they reference to their Original Filing they could maintain the original date of filing which would then be filed with the Secretary of the Treasury. If this is not done by July 1, 2002 it would result in the loss of their original filing date and also their status as the Secured Party by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Will filing UCC Financing statements and Change/Amendments cover all commercial activity, civil cases, and also criminal actions?
 Government sources claim that all Commercial Activity in the United States and other countries fall under the Legislated (Administrative) Law which is also called the Uniform Commercial Code. Once processed through the Federal Reserve System and/or the Department of the Treasury these transactions are Bonded. Although the Court System makes claims to have Jurisdiction over Commercial Transactions that seem to break Criminal Laws. In reality the UCC Articles on their own are Administrative Law and do not fall under any Jurisdiction of the Courts or to Litigation.

 Is the Redemption Process an attempt to gain something for nothing from the Treasury Department?  After June of 1933 the International Financiers who are the actual owners of the Federal Reserve System took ownership and control over all private and real property, this was done with the permission of Congress and an Executive Order signed by the President. By instituting your person to the status of the Secured Party for the government created entity listed on the Certificate of Live Birth is not the same thing as getting "something for nothing.."   These procedures set up by the government were put in place so that the Secured Party could reclaim a part of what is rightfully theirs under the U.S. Constitution. Congress made provision beginning in the early 1900s for every minor to reinstate their status as an American under the U.S. Constitution when they became of age. You were a minor when the original contract (Application) was entered into by your parents. These provisions were scattered throughout various legislative acts, joint resolutions and executive orders, many in 1933, as well as in the Congressional Record based on Public Policy HJR-192, codified in Public Law 73-10 and confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1939. See Guarantee Trust of New York v. Henwood, et al. By these placement actions the Government has kept the details so vague and hard to reference that no person could remedy himself without persistent research. There was not until recently, very many people who even knew that these procedures existed. The most important part of the Redemption of your Strawman is filing your UCC with the BirthState or UCC Regional office, the Secretary of the Treasury and filing in the State of Residence is required to the Redemption Process.


The International Monetary Fund using the Secretary of the Treasury as its representative, and using the Federal Reserve and the ability of the IRS to collect revenue has virtual control over every single Citizens Assets. Once the Secured Party uses the UCC/Redemption they will create the right to reverse this control over the Government created Debtor (Straw man). What the Secured Party accomplishes with this is to put themselves on the same level as the Secretary of the Treasury and this will lead to taking back the control over their own assets.

 A properly prepared and correctly filed UCC filing will ensure in the future to protect the property and assets of the Secured Party. These filings will make it clear that there is a legal and vested interest control of the Secured Party. You will not have to deal in Court Jurisdictions and stay out of the area of controversy.

 Under the UCC/Redemption Process the Secured Party does not obtain the actual Application for a Certificate of Live Birth. This means that the Process is only to be used for an "Accepted For Value" answer to any Commercial Claim. If a written and contracted claim is received by the Debtor (Strawman). it can be Accepted For Value by the Secured Party. The claim can then be discharged when the proper documents are forwarded through the Secretary of the Treasury to the UCC Contract Trust which remains filed with the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS.

 The Department of the Treasury Employees make it quite clear that they will not accept or perform any actions to faxed orders, telephoned or wired instructions. It must be hard-copies that are Original in both signature and any forms or documents. These documents must be delivered by Certified (or registered) mail and must be filed with both the State of Residence as well as the Secretary of the Treasury.  The Internal Revenue Service has increased its use of illegal threats and intimidation. They use the FBI to aid them in their attempts to admonish and Stop the presentments of any Bill of Exchange documents delivered by the Secured party to the Secretary. This does not mean that properly presented and prepared negotiable instruments from a legitimate Secured Party should and can be legally processed under law through local Financial Institutions by the person making the claim. This is done through the Secretary of the Treasury and recorded by the Financial Institution through the Treasury Tax and Loan (TTL) account.


There are some employees at the Department of the Treasury who continue to misdirect many of the Documents which is presented by a Secured Party to the Secretary of the Treasury by mislabeling them as Treasury Securities (they are not Treasury Securities ) then they are forwarded to the Bureau of Public Debt rather then send them to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS and the UCC Contract Trust.


From what I have been able to learn is that the Discharge of Claims in the Public Sector whether Federal or State Claims, issued by the Internal Revenue Service are easily discharged with a simple computer entry and transfer of credit and debt through the computer using the IRS Technical Support Division. There is verification that this process has come from the Special Procedure Handling Offices of the IRS. When a Secured Party utilizes the Uniform Commercial Code correctly the field is leveled as it pertains to the degree of commercial transactions. Despite the blockage of information as well as being told false information "We The People" are continuing to gain knowledge and information regardless of being the target of threats and blackmail.


It seems that over twenty five million Americans have successfully redeemed their Strawman and achieved access to their Strawman Trust Account before 26 May 2003. It is rumored that many of these twenty five million were political insiders: (politicians, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, senior military, secret service and security services personnel and their families and others) are implicated in the establishment and the maintaining in this fictional and fraudulent system. A system that has been used to abuse the mass population of the United States for over seventy years prior to 2003.


I believe that most people will do nothing to redeem themselves simply because they believe they are better off being Property of the State and being held responsible for a Government created Straw Man is just fine with them.

ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER OVERVIEW

YOU WILL NEED TO SETUP THE (CLOSED )ACCOUNT FOR THE EFT FIRST FOLLOWING THE GUIDELINES BELOW.

The EFT (SETOFF) TRANSACTION MUST be written on CLOSED personal bank account ONLY! (In regards to public bank CHECK transactions, this is illegal!) It is to be clearly directed on the instrument that it is an EFT transaction only (NOT AN ACH CHECK).




WHAT IS A CLOSED ACCOUNT AND WHAT IS IT FOR?

Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition: CLOSED ACCOUNT: An account to which no further additions can be made on either side, but which remains open for adjustment and set-off, which distinguishes it from and account stated.

You must open a bank account and then close it! All closed bank accounts are NOT closed by the bank!

In the definition of “Closed Account” above the term ’side’ means public and private side and it refers to a bank’s accounting ledger! If you do not understand public vs private banking transactions then do not proceed!

If you feel you need to ask your bank about how this works then do not proceed!

The bank you use to process this transaction MUST be a large commercial bank and not a local credit union.

CRITICAL: DO NOT OPEN THE BANK ACCOUNT WHERE THE LOAN/DEBT IS LOCATED! USE A DIFFERENT BANK!!!! ALSO DO NOT USE THE BANK YOU CURRENTLY USE FOR EVERYDAY BANKING. IF YOU DO, THE BANK WILL CLOSE YOUR ACTIVE ACCOUNTS!

The account must be a personal checking account ONLY and NOT a business account!

You must use check fraud proof ink (Order Online) otherwise you are committing fraud!

An EFT Transaction and ACH are two entirely different things! If the bank runs the instrument through as an ACH (A Check/Public Transaction) the transaction will be reversed automatically. Remember the definition of a closed account? Can the bank run it through as anything but a SET-OFF? If this happens who is in the wrong you or the bank? Better yet who made the mistake because it would have to be a mistake! Now you are learning!

YOU CAN EFT YOUR PUBLIC DEBT OR SOMEONE ELSE’S PUBLIC DEBT.

This type of transaction is NOT recommended for open accounts like cell phones, electric bills etc..

It has worked for taxes, student loans, credit cards, car loans, child support and public debt in general.

THE SECRET TO THE EFT’S SUCCESS IS THE WAY YOU FOLLOW UP. IN A LOT OF CASES THE EFT GOES THROUGH WHEN YOU FIRST SEND IT! IF YOU GET ANY OTHER RESPONSE BACK OR NO RESPONSE  YOU MUST BE PERSISTENT BY FOLLOWING UP WITH YOUR CORRECT RESPONSE LETTER AND STAND ON YOUR PROCESS. DO NOT GIVE IN TO THEIR BLUFFS AND HOLD YOUR GROUND. YOU ARE THE ENFORCER OF YOUR LAWFUL PROCESS AND YOU WILL BE SUCCESSFUL IF YOU FOLLOW UP CORRECTLY.

THE OTHER SIDE MAY OFFER TO TAKE YOU TO COURT, BUT THIS WOULD BE TO YOUR ADVANTAGE AND NOT THEIRS. NO ONE IS WILLING TO STAND LIABLE FOR THE AMOUNT OF THE DEBT AND THEY CERTAINLY DO NOT WANT TO COMMIT PERJURY WHICH IS WHAT THEY WILL HAVE TO DO IF YO GO TO COURT.

EACH SITUATION IS A BIT DIFFERENT AND MIGHT REQUIRE A DIFFERENT FOLLOW UP LETTER AND WE CAN PROVIDE DIFFERENT EXAMPLES.

ABOUT AN EFT REFUSAL : REMEMBER THAT UNDER THE UCC, IF THE INSTRUMENT IS REFUSED THEN THE PARTY THAT REFUSED IT ACCEPTED IT! HOW AWESOME IS THAT? THIS MEANS THAT IF THEY ACCEPT IT, IT IS ACCEPTED AND IF THEY REFUSE IT, IT IS ACCEPTED! DO YOU SEE HOW YOU CANNOT LOSE? YES YOU MIGHT HAVE TO SEND YOUR FOLLOW UP LETTER TO MAKE THIS CLEAR, BUT YOU NEED TO KNOW THAT YOUR SET-OFF REALLY DID PAY THE BILL IN FULL!

 Property titles take several weeks to attain sometimes.

Remember, never talk with creditors on the phone or in person, only in writing. If bill collectors are harassing you by phone, tell them you do not contract over the phone and then hang up!

Traffic Ticket (Nearly any charging instrument can be handled this way.)



NOTICE:  When a petition for abatement is before a court, that court is charged with according to the petitioner to the advantage if there is doubt on the part of the court.  In addition, courts should take cognizance of the law that provides:  Where conditions for its issuance exist, abatement is a matter of right, not of discretion.  The misnomer or mis-description of a party defendant is ground for abatement, and grounds for abatements are the same for equity and law cases.

Also, please note that the abatement does not preclude petitioners remedies and relief available under any law forum for the injury and damages incurred by false accusations from corporate officers, and the like.


 Demonstrating Competence in Commerce.



(These events occurred on Dec. 10, 2016 A.D. in the Municipal Court for the City of Tumwater, Washington.  Prior to entering the Court, Our Man has written on the face of the ticket "Refused for Cause without Dishonor, Abandoned Paper and Fraudulent Commercial Claim".  The ticket was returned to the Clerk of the Court within 72 hours of being issued.  About 10 days later, Our Man received a Notice of Mitigation Hearing regarding this matter for the stated date.  Our Man then put in a one page Notice and Demand for Abatement.  No other actions were taken prior to going into court.  I have changed only the name of Our Man.  All other information is true and correct as best as I know.)
Judge Lyman:  The case of JOHN HENRY SMITH.
(Our Man walks up to the Defendant's Lectern and starts shuffling his papers.  The Judge has a large pile of papers in his hand.  Probably 30 to 40 pages of paper.  Now Our Man has not put any of this in the case.  Hmmmm.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
(Our Man doesn't answer but continues to sort his papers.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?  (A little emphasis on the question.)
Our Man:  Is this being recorded?
Judge Lyman:  Yes.  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
Our Man:  If I may read my statement, I think it will become clear.
Judge Lyman:  O.K., go ahead.
Our Man:  I am John Henry of the family Smith.  I am here today to settle this matter.
Regarding Number TPD7Y2231291 I'm here today, appearing specially and not generally, to abate the matter of a worthless security interest known as a UCC-1 commercial lien in the form of a "TRAFFIC INFRACTION" against the Federal Reserve account in the name of JOHN HENRY SMITH, a decedent.  Said worthless security interest was created by an employee of CITY OF TUMWATER who identified himself as Jon Weiks #0032 on October 29, 2007, a mere pirate operating under color of law, who on said date and with subterfuge attempted to attach private copyrighted dead man statutes to me, a living Man, for the express purpose of stealing my sweat equity .  I then exercised my Right of Avoidance to this offered commercial venture by returning this abandoned and defective paper for cause without dishonor to Sheryle Wyatt or her agent on October 31, 2007.  This was clearly a case of mistaken identity as the charged entity is a decedent under Title 26 USC and not me and this is the basis upon which I move for abatement.

"Sir, are you prepared to abate this matter now?"
(It would be helpful to know, that Our Man is about 6'5" tall and speaks rather slowly in a monotone voice;  totally unthreatening in his demeanor.)
Judge Lyman:  NO!

Our Man:      I will then continue my statement as follows: Let the record reflect that J.V. Lyman has denied the Principal's motion for abatement.  My rejection of the offer made by CITY OF TUMWATER to raid the Decedent's estate,  one JOHN HENRY SMITH, should have ended the matter, however, apparently this private commercial trading company known as "CITY OF TUMWATER/MUNICIPAL COURT DUNNS # 03-851-7355, SIC # 91110201, Cage Code # 1T9M3", a store front masquerading as an office in the judicial branch of Government and operating under the Department of Defense, is hell bent for it's own personal gain on probating the estate of JOHN HENRY SMITH, of which I am the Owner and Principal.  For the record, I object to the probating of said estate and do not give my permission thereto.  I am here today for the express purpose of establishing my Right of Avoidance if anyone should attempt to impose a Claim of Distress against the person of my collateral.  Any outcome on this matter other than an outright abatement or a check written to me for certified funds today assuming the transfer of funds has already taken place, will result in a Demand to the DTCC (Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation) for Investigation of Fraud on the TRAFFIC INFRACTION, a fraudulent
security.
I now ask you the following:
Does the prosecutor have a 1099OID in regard to the "charge"?
Judge Lyman:  There is no Prosecutor here.
Does the clerk?
(Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.)
I've got my claim here…where is yours?
(Again Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.
Our Man holds up his IRS forms 706, 709, and 1099OID.)
Tell me, Sir, who the payor is and also who the recipient of the funds is.

If you're the recipient, then I guess you'll be paying the transfer taxes on this charitable contribution from the Decedent's estate which you are attempting to probate here.  We both know that if you haven't paid the tax, you have no claim in Equity.

ARE YOU READY NOW, SIR, TO ABATE THIS MATTER?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's question and continues on.)
Sir, have you paid the taxes?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
Sir, have you already probated this estate behind my back?
Under 26 USC 2002 you are personally liable for payment as the executor defined under 2203 because you have actual or constructive possession of the property.
Judge Lyman:  It sounds like you would like this matter mitigated.  I am going to read the Officer's affidavit into the record.  (The Judge proceeds to read about a 5 page Affidavit from the Officer.  The Officer covered just about everything possible except counting the dents and scratches on Our Man's car.  Amazingly complete.)
Judge Lyman:  I can't determine from the Officers Affidavit whether you committed an infraction of the Law or not.  I am dismissing this matter.
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's and continues reading his script into the record.)
Sir, have you already taken a charitable contribution from my estate to fund your purchase of private equities in mutual funds?

Sir, have you already submitted a 1099R for that purpose?
If you've acquired funds from the decedent's estate that makes you a qualified heir and not paying the taxes makes the property you stole contraband which means all the forfeiture statutes kick in.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case.
(Our Man just keeps on reading.)
Unless you abate this matter here and now OR give me a check for the funds you stole, I will be alerting the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS that you are guilty of tax evasion and money laundering and to start an investigation on you personally with regards to my estate.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case!  (The Judge is turning red and sweating).
(Our Man just walks up to the lady acting like a Clerk and hands her all his IRS forms and leaves.  The Judge is visibly shaken by the whole matter.)


Fraud behind the Marriage License!

A Marriage License Application is a request to your “Masters” for permission to marry.
If you ever had any claim of sovereignty before that date; you lost it completely when you
applied for and married under a marriage license. Sovereignty means: “To assert ones
independence and to claim to be self-governing.” The license isn’t necessary and never has
been because a marriage has always been just a contract, witnessed by God, between a man
and a woman! Who told you that you must apply for a license? It is the official you chose to
conduct your ceremony? The official just happens to be a licensed government official and
his license prevents him from conducting marriage ceremonies without the issuance of a
marriage license. Did Moses or Jesus ever say or profess that a marriage is not recognized
by God, without a license?






Here’s the Fraud behind the License:
Those who apply for and marry pursuant to a marriage license have now added a third party
to their marriage contract! The third party is the Master, by and through his Agent, the
Corporate State. The marriage license bestows the State with the legal right to decide the
fate of the husband, wife and the possessions they procured during their marriage, should
the marriage fail. Their divorce must now be decided by and through the States Corporate
Court by a Corporate Judge, and the Judges first and foremost concern is the “interest of the
State.” The interest of the bride and groom is now secondary.
[See: VanKosten v. VanKosten, 154 N.E. 146]. A comment by the Judge deciding this
divorce says it all! “The ultimate ownership of all property is the State: individual so called
ownership is only by virtue of government, [i.e.] laws amounting to mere use
must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the state.” [Also
See: Senate Document No. 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1st Session] and [Brown v. Welch, U.
S. Superior Court].
d) The term “license” is defined in law as, “A permit to do something illegal.” [See:
Blacks Law Dictionary, 6th or 7th Edition]. Therefore, all licenses are permits to violate
the only real law! Inalienable rights are the rights bestowed upon all living men, by God
at birth! All other laws are subordinate to God’s law. The controlling government wants
us to rely on their laws, so they demand that we apply for a license! Another example is a
“Drivers License.” It is your God given right to travel the roadways of this nation and no
government has any right to restrict, tax or license your pursuit of happiness! The only
exception is a Driver of a Commercial Vehicle. The governments have a right to regulate
Commerce, which means trade. Anyone operating a vehicle in Commerce must be
licensed but all others are absolutely free to travel without one! The foreign Agents in
power; have changed the common meanings of words to encapsulate and control every
Sovereign. They succeed in this intimidation through the corporate courts and police
enforcement by officers who have been brainwashed and reinforced by mandatory
training programs.

CESTUI QUE VIE Trust

The CESTUI QUE VIE Trust is an account you inherited due to the bankruptcy of the U.S. in 1933 and the subsequent ceasing of all the citizens gold, silver and other assets as collateral.  This account contains millions of dollars in your name.  The only problem is that the government and legal system failed to inform you about it and how to access your money.  In the meantime, they are drawing down on it for their own personal use and as payment to the Vatican and the English crown.

"It is the funds contained in this  CESTUI QUE VIE that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in!  This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments."

"Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust.  The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTUI QUE VIE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations."

"You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST.  Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time.  Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them.  If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it?  A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due.  Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these CESTUI QUE VIE Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature."



The Legal Ownership of All Souls by the Vatican… Since 1306!



The 1st Trust of the world

Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of history and the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It is an express trust deed. The last line reads:  “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” It is not only the first trust deed in history but also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.

Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum
In 1302 Pope Boniface issued his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam––the first Express Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the world”. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pinecone, with an elaborate crown at its base. The pinecone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele.  It also represents the pineal gland in the centre of our brains––crystalline in nature–– which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pinecone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone.

The 1st Crown of Crown Land
Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Hence, all land is claimed as “crown land”.  This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.

The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth
The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.

This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day.  This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.

The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See 

The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See.  The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.

This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls––upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.

The Cestui Que Vie Trust
A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It is a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.
A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide.  As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:

1.  convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,
2.  claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.
3.  claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).
What is the real power of a court ‘judge’?
Given what has been revealed about the foundations of Roman Law, what is the real hidden power of a judge when we face court?  Is it their superior knowledge of process and procedure or of magic? Or is it something simpler and far more obvious?

It is unfortunate that much of the excitement about Estates and Executors has deliberately not revealed that an Estate, by definition, has to belong to a Trust––to be specific, a Testamentary Trust or CQV Trust. When we receive legal paper or have to appear in court, it is these same CQV Trusts which have our rights converted into the property contained within them. Instead of being the Trustee, or the Executor, or Administrator, we are merely the Beneficiary of each CQV Trust, granted only beneficial and equitable use of certain property, never legal title. So if the Roman Legal System assumes we are merely the beneficiary of these CQV Trusts, when we go to court, who represents the Trustee and Office of Executor? We all know that all cases are based upon the judge’s discretion which often defies procedures, statutes, and maxims of law. Well, they are doing what any Trustee or Executor, administering a trust in the presence of the beneficiary, can do under Roman Law and all the statutes, maxims, and procedures are really for show because under the principles of Trust Law, as first formed by the Roman Cult, a Trustee has a wide latitude, including the ability to correct any procedural mistakes, by obtaining the implied or tacit consent of the beneficiary, to obviate any mistakes. The judge is the real and legal Name. The judge is the trust, itself. We are the mirror image to them––the ghost––the dead. It is high sorcery, trickery, and subterfuge that has remained “legal” for far too long. Spread the word.