DEBT VALIDATION LETTER

 Date: April 4, 2023                      Delivery Confirmation: Certified Mail Number


NOTICE AND DEMAND TO VALIDATE DEBT CLAIM



From :                 YOUR NAME

Street Location  YOUR ADDRESS

City & State        YOUR CITY & STATE

Zip Code             YOUR ZIPCODE

To:                   DEBT COLLECTOR NAME

Address          STREET ADDRESS

City & State   CITY & STATE 

Zip Code         ZIPCODE


REF: Your correspondence purporting to allege a debt claimed by:


                   Name      ORIGINAL CREDITOR NAME

                   Address  STREET ADDRESS

                   City & State  CITY & STATE

                   Alleged Account # THEIR ACCOUNT NUMBER

                   Alleged Balance $ ALLEGED BALANCE


This is an offer to fully pay/discharge the attached claim of debt on the condition that the claiming parties comply with this notice within 30 days of receipt of this correspondence.


NOTICE OF CLAIM DISPUTE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

APPLICABLE TO ALL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS



*******SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE*******

_____________________________________________________________________


NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST COLLECTION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO VALIDATION OF PURPORTED DEBT


Pursuant to the truth in lending laws of the United States Code, Title 15 § 1601 et. seq. and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act laws of the United States Code § 1692 et. seq.

This notice constitutes a timely written response to your Fair Debt Collection Practices Act notice that you are attempting to collect an alleged debt and is not a dishonor of your alleged claim of debt.

This notice is my, required by law, demand to “cease and desist” collection activities prior to validation of purported debt and you must validate the enclosed claim of an alleged debt.  You must provide verification that an actual debt really exists by producing the following:


(1) The name and address of the organization or other governmental unit alleging a debt;


(2) The name and address of the person or persons in that organization or other governmental unit alleging a claim of a debt;


(3) The name of the actual creditor even if that is myself;


(4) The origin of the funds used to create this alleged claim of a debt


(5) The actual records of the organization or other government unit showing the time and place of the deposit and distribution of the funds used to create this alleged claim of debt.


(6) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that an actual loan was made from the organization or other governmental unit’s own funds that resulted in the enclosed alleged claim of a debt.


(7) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit with a live signature on any and all document/instrument(s) used to allege the existence of a real loan of funds or debt from the organization or other governmental unit to myself or anyone else by a similar name.


(8) Be advised that verification is defined (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) as follows:  “Confirmation of correctness, truth, or authenticity, by affidavit, oath or deposition”.  Affidavit of truth of matter stated and object of verification is to assure good faith in averments or statements of party.


(9) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that an honest disclosure of facts relating to the alleged loan was made by the organization or other governmental unit in compliance with the truth in lending laws of the United States Code, Title 15 § 1601 et. seq. and Regulation Z.


(10) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that any and all document/instrument(s) containing my signature or the likeness of my signature were not negotiated or pledged by the organization or other governmental unit against my credit to create the funds used for the appearance of a debt and resulting in this alleged claim of debt.

(11) The person that prepares and swears to the validation of debt must describe: 1) your job description on a daily basis; 2) if you are the regular keeper of those books and records and are familiar with how they are kept and their contents; 3) how long have you been in your position; 4) when did you first come in contact with the alleged account/debt; 5) how frequently do you work with the files and information they are presenting to verify/validate the alleged debt; 6) are you the person/employee who regularly works with the alleged account/debt; and 7) do you have personal knowledge about the alleged debt and/or any alleged account.


15 U.S.C. § 1692 (e) states that a “false, deceptive, and misleading representation, in connection with the collection of any debt,” includes the false representation of the character or legal status of any debt and further makes a threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken a deceptive practice.


Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (g) (4) Validation of Debts, if you have evidence to validate your claim that the attached presentment does not constitute fraudulent

misrepresentation and that one owes this alleged debt, this is a demand that, within 30 days, you provide such verification/validation and supporting evidence signed and certified under penalty of perjury to substantiate your claim.  Until the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act have been complied with and your claim is verified/validated, you have no consent to continue any collection activities.


This is a constructive notice that, absent the validation of your claim within 30 days, you must “cease and desist” any and all collection activity and are prohibited from contacting me through the mail, by telephone, in person, at my home, or at my work.  You are further prohibited from contacting any other third party.  Each and every attempted contact, in violation of this act, will constitute harassment and defamation of character and will subject your agency and/or attorney and any and all agents in his/her individual capacities, who take part in such harassment, and defamation, to a liability for actual damages, as well as statutory damages of up to $1,000 for each and every violation, and a further liability for legal fees to be paid to any counsel which I may retain.  Further, absent such validation of your claim, you are prohibited from filing any notice of lien and/or levy or judgment and are also barred from reporting any derogatory credit information to any credit reporting agency, regarding this disputed purported debt.


Further, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (g) (8), as you are merely an “agency” or other governmental unit of the United States, acting on someone else’s behalf, this is a demand that you provide the name of the original “principal”, or “holder in due course”, for whom you are attempting to collect this alleged debt.


Please take notice that this is a criminal investigation of the business practices of the above named organization or other governmental unit, its agents, officers, employees and attorney to determine violations of the United States criminal laws.  Your enclosed claim of collection of a purported debt appears to be founded upon a false record in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 § 2071 and 2073 (falsifying records) and further; uttering and possessing false obligations and counterfeit securities based upon the falsified records in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 § 471, 472, 473 and/or 513, and further: using corrupt business practices to make and possess false records and claim of obligation, not substantiated by truthful facts in violation of the Federal Racketeer Influences and Corrupt Organization (RICO), U.S.C. Title 18 § 1961 et. seq. and further: using the U.S. Mail to present such fraud and false instruments amounting to Mail Fraud, criminal conduct falling under Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and Swindles laws, and further sending mail with false and fictitious names, a criminal conduct falling under Title 18 U.S.C. § 1842 – Fictitious Names.



TAKE NOTICE




Debt Collector’s failure in providing Respondent with the requisite verification, validating the above referenced alleged debt within the requirements of law as codified in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act and the corresponding laws of each state, signifies that Debt Collector tacitly agrees that:


a. Debt Collector has no lawful, bona fide, verified claim, re the above-referenced alleged account:

b. Debt Collector waives any and all claims against Respondent and

c. Debt Collector tacitly agrees that Debt Collector will compensate Respondent for all costs, fees and expenses incurred in defending against this and any and all continued collection attempts, re the above-referenced alleged account.

d. Failure of Debt Collector to properly and legally verify/validate alleged debt as required in this notice is a self executing irrevocable power of attorney authorizing Respondent/Alleged Debtor named herein to direct the permanent removal, on behalf of the alleged Creditor, of any and all references to said account in any and all credit reporting agency files of any type.


This response will constitute my effort to resolve this on-going debt claim between the parties involved.  Until full disclosure is achieved, there can be no case, collection or action.  “No civil or criminal cause of action can arise lest, out of fraud, there be a valid, honest contract.”  See Eads v. Marks 249 P. 2d 257, 260.


Done this _____Day of ______________ 2010


I declare under penalties of perjury in accordance with the laws of the United States of America (without the “United States”) Title 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1) the forgoing is true and correct and is admitted when not rebutted, so help me.


                                                                                             ______________________________


On the _____ day of ________ 2009 Your Name personally appeared before me in Your County & State and placed his/her signature above.


____________________                          Seal:

Notary Signature


Public Servant Questionnaire

 

This questionnaire must be filled-out by any public servant before he can ask the citizen any question. Federal law, including the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, 88 Stat. 1896, et seq., 1974, authorizes this.

1. Public servant's full legal name:

2. Public servant's residence address:

3. Name of agency:

4. Full legal name of supervisor and office address:

5. Will you as a public servant uphold the constitution of the United States?

 Yes  No

6. Did public servant provide proof of identity?

 Yes  No

7. ID number:

Badge Number:

Bonding agency and number:

8. Will you as a public servant furnish a copy of the law or regulation that authorizes the action being taken or information requested in this case?

 Yes  No

9. Will you as a public servant provide in writing, that portion of the law authorizing the questions asked?

 Yes  No

10. Are answers voluntary or mandatory?

 Voluntary  Mandatory  ?

11. Are the questions being asked based upon a specific law or regulation, or are they a discovery process?

 

12. What other uses may be made of this information?

13. What other agencies may have access to this information?

14. What will be the effect upon me if I should not choose to answer any or all of these questions?

15. Name of person in government requesting this information:

16. Is this investigation general or special?

Note: by ‘general,’ it means any kind of blanket investigations in which a number of persons are involved because of geography, type of business income, etc. By ‘special,’ it means any investigation of an individual nature in which others are not involved.

17. Have you consulted, questioned, interviewed, or received information from any third party relating to this matter?

 Yes  No

If yes, give identity of all such third parties: (Use back of sheet if more area is needed.)

1. ___________________________________________________________________

2. ___________________________________________________________________

3. ____________________________________________________________________

4. ____________________________________________________________________

18. Do you reasonably anticipate either a civil or criminal action to be initiated or pursued based upon any of the information, which you seek?

 Yes  No

19. Is there a file of records, information, or correspondence relating to me being maintained by this agency?

 Yes  No

20. Is this agency using any information on me, which was supplied, by another agency or government source?

 Yes  No

 

21. Will the public servant guarantee that any other department other than the one by which he is employed will not use the information in these files?

 Yes  No

 

I hereby sign and affirm under the penalty of perjury that the answers are true and correct in every particular.

 

_____________________________________

Signature of public servant

Notice: If any person or agency receives any request for information relating to me, you must advise me in writing before releasing such information. Failure to do so may subject you to possible civil or criminal action as provided by this act or other law(s).


CITATIONS AND OFFERS TO CONTRACT






When a Police Officer issues you a CITATION, he is actually requesting you to CONTRACT with him! He is alleging that you violated a corporate regulation in writing, which you have accepted by signing and thus requires you to respond.
The Police Officer is instructed to explain that your signature is merely an acknowledgment that you received a copy of the CITATION but in actuality, your signature is notification to the Court and Judge that you have accepted or CONSENTED to this offer to CONTRACT, which also grants the Judge CONSENT; PERSONAM and SUBJECT MATTER jurisdiction over you and the case!

You can cancel that CONTRACT however by rescinding your CONSENT. The Federal Truth in Lending Act provides that any party to a CONTRACT may rescind his CONSENT, within three business days of entering into such a CONTRACT. So across the face of the CITATION you should print or type in large print, the following words:
I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT
and
I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS.
Use blue ink [for admiralty] or purple ink [for royalty]. Admiralty is the Court and Royalty represents your Sovereignty. Either way is appropriate. Sign your signature underneath in blue or purple ink and in front of a Notary and under your signature type: Without prejudice, UCC 1-308. This is another way to declare that you may not be held responsible for this Contract pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code.
Serve Cancelled Citation back it on the Clerk / Court, along with a Certificate of Service, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. This kills the CITATION; removes your CONSENT and removes the JURISDICTION of the Court, all at the same time. It really is that simple!
NOTE: A Certificate of Service is a letter that first identifies the Citation and then defines how and when you returned the document to the Court and is signed. If not denied, it becomes a truth in commerce by Tacit Procuration.
Remember to keep a copy of everything, in case the Clerk attempts to trash your response, which certainly will not happen with a Certificate of Service or if it is mailed back by the Notary. The Notary is actually a Deputy Secretary of State and is more powerful than the Court Clerk!
Public Notaries originate from the time of the Egyptian and Roman Scribes who were the purveyors of certified documents, which are sworn affidavits. Certified documents and sworn affidavits are truth in commerce. [e.g.] Birth Certificates are certified documents on bonded paper. The word bonded is derived from bondage as in slavery, which makes all of us Bond Slaves to whoever retains custody of our original Birth Certificates. I bet you believed that the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves and it did for a short time and then the Birth Certificate and the 14th Amendment enslaved us all!

Canada, and the United States are corporations sole

 A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single ("sole") incorporated office, occupied by a single ("sole") natural person.[1][2] This structure allows corporations (often religious corporations or Commonwealth governments) to pass without interruption from one officeholder to the next, giving positions legal continuity with subsequent officeholders having identical powers and possessions to their predecessors. A corporation sole is one of two types of corporation, the other being a corporation aggregate.[3]


Ecclesiastical origins

Most corporations sole are church-related[1] (for example, the archbishopric of Canterbury),[citation needed] although some political offices of the United Kingdom (e.g., many of the secretaries of state), Canada, and the United States are corporations sole.[4]


The concept of corporation sole originated as a means for orderly transfer of ecclesiastical property, serving to keep the title within the denomination or religious society. In order to keep the religious property from being treated as the estate of the vicar of the church, the property was titled to the office of the corporation sole. In the case of the Catholic Church, ecclesiastical property is usually titled to the diocesan bishop, who serves in the office of the corporation sole.


The Catholic Church continues to use corporations sole in holding titles of property: as recently as 2002, it split a diocese in the US state of California into many smaller corporations sole and with each parish priest becoming his own corporation sole, thus limiting the diocese's liability for any sexual abuse or other wrongful activity in which the priest might engage. This is, however, not the case everywhere, and legal application varies. For instance, other U.S. jurisdictions have used corporations at multiple levels.[5][6] In the jurisdictions of England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland, a Catholic bishop is not a corporation sole, and real property is held by way of land trusts, a tradition dating back to the suppression of Catholicism by Henry VIII during the English Reformation and the Penal Laws of Ireland.[citation needed]


The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints uses the corporation sole form for its president, which is legally listed as "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints".[7]


Iglesia ni Cristo was registered as corporation sole with the Insular Government of the Philippines in 1914[8] and with the People's Republic of China in 2014.[citation needed]


The corporation sole form can serve the needs of a religious organization by reducing its complexity to that of a single office and its holder, thereby eliminating the need for by-laws and a board of directors.[citation needed][original research?]


The Crown

Main article: The Crown

Within most constitutional monarchies, notably the Commonwealth realms, the Crown is a nonstatutory corporation sole.[9][10][11][12] Although conceptually speaking, the office and officeholder retain dual capacities in that they may act both in a corporate capacity (as monarch) and in an individual capacity (as a private person), they are inseparably fused in law; there is no legal distinction between the office and the individual person who holds it.[13] The Crown (state) legally acts as a person when it enters into contracts and possesses property.[14] As a person, the monarch (officeholder) may hold properties privately, distinct from property he or she possesses corporately, and may act as monarch separate from their personal acts. For example, Charles III as a natural person holds several separate offices, such as king of the United Kingdom, king of Canada, king of Australia, and the supreme governor of the Church of England, all of which are distinct corporations sole, even as he acts as a natural person in his private capacities separate and apart from his role filling these various offices (corporations). Likewise, the office of prime minister has use of certain properties and privileges, such as an official residence and decision-making powers, that remain with the office once the officeholder leaves, even as the officeholder may own property in a private capacity.[citation needed]


The sovereign's status as a corporation sole ensures that all references to the king, the queen, His Majesty, Her Majesty, and the Crown are synonymous, referring to exactly the same legal personality over time.[15][16] While natural persons who serve as sovereign pass on, the sovereign never legally dies;[17] thus the corporate nature of the office of sovereign ensures that the authority of the state continues uninterrupted.[18] In other words, the sovereign is made a corporation sole to prevent the possibility of disruption or interregnum, thereby preserving the stability of the Crown (state). For this reason, at the moment of the demise of the sovereign, a successor is immediately and automatically in place.[10][19]


As a corporation sole, the legal person of the sovereign is the personification of the state and consequently acts as a guarantor of the rule of law and the fount of all executive authority behind the state's institutions.[20] As Australia and Canada have federal systems of government, the sovereign in these cases also possesses capacities as distinct corporation sole in right of each of the Australian states and Canadian provinces; for example, as His Majesty the King of Australia in Right of Queensland and His Majesty the King of Canada in Right of Alberta.[citation needed]


Secular application in the United States

Every state of the United States recognizes corporations sole under common law, and about a third of the states have specific statutes that stipulate the conditions under which that state recognizes the corporations sole that are filed with that state for acquiring, holding, and disposing of title for church and religious society property.[21][22] Almost any religious society or church can qualify for filing as a corporation sole in these states. There can be no legal limitation to specific denominations, therefore a Buddhist temple or Jewish Community Center would qualify as quickly as a Christian church. Some states also recognize corporations sole for various other non-profit purposes including performing arts groups, scientific research groups, educational institutions, and cemetery societies.[citation needed]


Examples of corporations sole in the United Kingdom

Governmental

The Crown (sometimes regarded as a corporation aggregate)[23]

Administrator of Japanese Property (no longer exists)[24]

Auditor General for Wales[25]

Chief Executive of Skills Funding[26]

Children's Commissioner for England[27]

Children's Commissioner for Wales[28]

Commissioner for Older People for Northern Ireland[29]

Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Comptroller and Auditor General

The Corporate Officer of the House of Commons,[30] and the Corporate Officer of the House of Lords,[31] two corporations established by the Parliamentary Corporate Bodies Act 1992

The Dawat-e-Hadiyah[32]

Duke of Cornwall

Duke of Lancaster

Information Commissioner[33]

Mayor (of London)'s Office for Policing and Crime

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman[23]

Lord Mayor of the City of London[1]

Official Custodian for Charities[34]

Immigration Services Commissioner

Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland[35]

Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Public Trustee[36]

Pubs Code Adjudicator[37]

Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District[38] (abolished)

Registrar General

many secretaries of state in the United Kingdom (various; most recently Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs)[39]

Solicitor for the affairs of the Duchy of Lancaster[40]

Treasury Solicitor[41]

London Fire Commissioner[42]

Dai al-Mutlaq[43]

In the Church of England

Archbishop of Canterbury[44]

Archbishop of York[44]

Bishops of the Church of England[3][1]

Deans of the Church of England[1]

Rectors and Team Rectors in the Church of England

Vicars in the Church of England[45][46]

Examples of corporations sole in New Zealand

New Zealand Public Trustee

Māori Trustee, New Zealand[47]

New Zealand's Office of the Privacy Commissioner[48]

Examples of corporations sole elsewhere

The Diocese of Hong Kong[49]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in the office of its Presiding Bishop[7]

Director of National Parks, Australian government[50]

Governor General of Canada[51]

Minister of the Government, Republic of Ireland

Public Trustee

The Archbishop of Manila

The Archbishop of New York

Office of the sovereign of Canada

The Catholic Bishop of Chicago, A Corporation Sole- The Archdiocese of Chicago

(Former) Administrator of the Southern Electricity Supply of New South Wales