The pirates simply set up laws and wait for you to break one so that they can plunder your wealth and freedom.

What if I told you, you did not live in a country, nor do you have a true name, a true birth date and you did not have to file taxes or follow any laws? As many of you scoff, stop for a moment and examine these facts.

Simply put, we live on a planet we call earth and not in Countries. In fact Countries are not land under the real system of law, they are imaginary Seas, upon which Admiralty Law applies and the NAMES you use are imaginary ships floating on the Sea, where Piracy reigns as the system of Commerce, between your and all the other imaginary ships. But because you are not imaginary, they have to give you a play piece in the game. This is called a PERSON and its attributes are a NAME and BIRTH DATE. The Game is rigged from the start. The pirates simply set up laws and wait for you to break one so that they can plunder your wealth and freedom. A name is an imaginary thing you are given, typically when you were born. However, a name is simply hearsay; you do not know what your true name is, no one does. The other attribute of a person, a Birth Date, is hearsay because no one can say when exactly the Universe was created and making use of an event such as Jesus' Death, hence A.D., is only hearsay. Further Jesus was Crucified and died in the spring during Passover so the Calendar should actually start its new year in the spring. What they have done is to overlay an imaginary world over the earth and make you believe that it is real, when in fact it is simply fiction. So if you do not exist in their imaginary world, how is it that you must follow their laws and pay taxes? You are not responsible for paying taxes and following their laws and their laws even say so!

30 Little Known Facts about America

How did the American People become collateral for the debt instruments known as Federal Reserve Notes?

How did the American People become collateral for the debt instruments known as
Federal Reserve Notes? It was given to the Federal Reserve by a corporation
called the United States, the very same corporation that created the Federal
Reserve. As discussed previously, in 1933, when President Roosevelt declared a
national emergency because the United States could no longer pay its debts. At
least that was the spin given to the American People. All of the subsidiary
States agreed to support the declared bankruptcy by "pledging" the energy of
their "citizens." Their assets consisted only of State Citizens. The States in
turn used the Birth Certificates to pledge the State Citizen as collateral to
keep Government afloat. That is how the American People became collateral for
the Federal Reserve Notes and so-called debts. The American People became
warehouse receipts, like a warehouse full of any type of valuable goods. All of
this, however, was a major fraud. Neither the Internal Revenue Service nor any
other entity like Government files a UCC-I Financing Statement Into the
Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State. If they did, they would
instantly become subject to all the regulations of the Uniform Commercial Code.
The Internal Revenue Service has done very nicely by bluffing and intimidation,
as all others mentioned, by operating under "Public Policy" where there is in
reality "No Law" at all!
The State Citizen is drawn "into commerce" when their Birth Certificate is
registered and sent to the Commerce Department in Washington, D.C. This is where
the American People became warehouse receipts upon which all of the money
printed and circulated is created and guaranteed. In short, the American People
became the collateral for all debts. They "The People" allegedly are
"Government" property!
Government is a "fiction" and an artificial person and deals with us as a
fiction or artificial persons only as stated before. To take this still to
another level, let's use an example to explain and use the name of John Henry:
Smith. When John Henry: Smith was born, his parents gave him the Christian name
of John Henry and he shared the name of Smith with all the other members of his
family. He was born a living, breathing being. When his Birth Certificate was
sent to the Department of Commerce, it was registered and the Government,
because it was bankrupt, turned his "real name" into a fiction. His new
fictional name became JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. His ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS
NAME was registered as a corporation at the Puerto Rico Department of State
Corporations (Departamento de Estado - Division de Corporaciones) P.O. BOX 3271,
SAN JUAN, PUERTO RICO, 00904-3271, making him liable for taxes. He is now a
fiction or artificial person; a non-living, non-breathing "person." It is a
"strawman" (Lat. stramineus homo) or "fiction" which government brings all its
so-called charges against and NEVER against the real person. Just like "yours,"
his driver's license now reads JOHN H. SMITH or John H. Smith. When he signs a
1040 Tax Form, he dutifully fills out the form as John H. Smith and then signs
his name "under penalty of perjury, " thereby admitting he will be responsible
for all the taxes of John H. Smith, a fiction in law, corporation. Look at your
drivers license and see who it is issued to. How can government use a form of
our name and turn it into a fiction (corporation) without our permission? They
can't, we sign our name to all of their forms, which is purely voluntary
"permission-in-ignorance." In short, we do it to ourselves!
However, for those who wish to control and own this fiction and prohibit
government corporations, including the Internal Revenue Service from making so-
called charges against it, a remedy is available: to do this by executing a UCC-
1 Financing Statement! John Henry, Smith would simply do what Government and the
Internal Revenue Service does not do: File your UCC-1 Financing Statement into
the Commercial Registry with the Secretary of State and claim EVERYTHING related
to JOHN H. SMITH or any derivative name, corporate fiction; i.e.: the Birth
Certificate and Social Security Card and Number. The living, breathing, real
person then owns and controls the fictitious entity, including all contracts
related to the Birth Certificate and Social Security Number. Thusly, the real
John H. Smith, secures all rights, interest and title in the fictitious entity.
Now, government and the Internal Revenue Service has to deal with John Henry:
Smith but they cannot!, because he is no longer subject to government control.

click here:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=4XGFACJDZK2AJ

God Bless Bitcoin | Full Movie | Documentary

DEBT VALIDATION LETTER

 Date: April 4, 2023                      Delivery Confirmation: Certified Mail Number

NOTICE AND DEMAND TO VALIDATE DEBT CLAIM

From :                 YOUR NAME

Street Location  YOUR ADDRESS

City & State        YOUR CITY & STATE

Zip Code             YOUR ZIPCODE

To:                   DEBT COLLECTOR NAME

Address          STREET ADDRESS

City & State   CITY & STATE 

Zip Code         ZIPCODE

REF: Your correspondence purporting to allege a debt claimed by:

                   Name      ORIGINAL CREDITOR NAME

                   Address  STREET ADDRESS

                   City & State  CITY & STATE

                   Alleged Account # THEIR ACCOUNT NUMBER

                   Alleged Balance $ ALLEGED BALANCE

This is an offer to fully pay/discharge the attached claim of debt on the condition that the claiming parties comply with this notice within 30 days of receipt of this correspondence.

NOTICE OF CLAIM DISPUTE

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

APPLICABLE TO ALL SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS

*******SILENCE IS ACQUIESCENCE*******

_____________________________________________________________________

NOTICE AND DEMAND TO CEASE AND DESIST COLLECTION ACTIVITIES PRIOR TO VALIDATION OF PURPORTED DEBT

Pursuant to the truth in lending laws of the United States Code, Title 15 § 1601 et. seq. and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act laws of the United States Code § 1692 et. seq.

This notice constitutes a timely written response to your Fair Debt Collection Practices Act notice that you are attempting to collect an alleged debt and is not a dishonor of your alleged claim of debt.

This notice is my, required by law, demand to “cease and desist” collection activities prior to validation of purported debt and you must validate the enclosed claim of an alleged debt.  You must provide verification that an actual debt really exists by producing the following:

(1) The name and address of the organization or other governmental unit alleging a debt;

(2) The name and address of the person or persons in that organization or other governmental unit alleging a claim of a debt;

(3) The name of the actual creditor even if that is myself;

(4) The origin of the funds used to create this alleged claim of a debt

(5) The actual records of the organization or other government unit showing the time and place of the deposit and distribution of the funds used to create this alleged claim of debt.

(6) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that an actual loan was made from the organization or other governmental unit’s own funds that resulted in the enclosed alleged claim of a debt.

(7) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit with a live signature on any and all document/instrument(s) used to allege the existence of a real loan of funds or debt from the organization or other governmental unit to myself or anyone else by a similar name.

(8) Be advised that verification is defined (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition) as follows:  “Confirmation of correctness, truth, or authenticity, by affidavit, oath or deposition”.  Affidavit of truth of matter stated and object of verification is to assure good faith in averments or statements of party.

(9) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that an honest disclosure of facts relating to the alleged loan was made by the organization or other governmental unit in compliance with the truth in lending laws of the United States Code, Title 15 § 1601 et. seq. and Regulation Z.

(10) The actual records of the organization or other governmental unit showing that any and all document/instrument(s) containing my signature or the likeness of my signature were not negotiated or pledged by the organization or other governmental unit against my credit to create the funds used for the appearance of a debt and resulting in this alleged claim of debt.

(11) The person that prepares and swears to the validation of debt must describe: 1) your job description on a daily basis; 2) if you are the regular keeper of those books and records and are familiar with how they are kept and their contents; 3) how long have you been in your position; 4) when did you first come in contact with the alleged account/debt; 5) how frequently do you work with the files and information they are presenting to verify/validate the alleged debt; 6) are you the person/employee who regularly works with the alleged account/debt; and 7) do you have personal knowledge about the alleged debt and/or any alleged account.

15 U.S.C. § 1692 (e) states that a “false, deceptive, and misleading representation, in connection with the collection of any debt,” includes the false representation of the character or legal status of any debt and further makes a threat to take any action that cannot legally be taken a deceptive practice.

Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (g) (4) Validation of Debts, if you have evidence to validate your claim that the attached presentment does not constitute fraudulent

misrepresentation and that one owes this alleged debt, this is a demand that, within 30 days, you provide such verification/validation and supporting evidence signed and certified under penalty of perjury to substantiate your claim.  Until the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act have been complied with and your claim is verified/validated, you have no consent to continue any collection activities.

This is a constructive notice that, absent the validation of your claim within 30 days, you must “cease and desist” any and all collection activity and are prohibited from contacting me through the mail, by telephone, in person, at my home, or at my work.  You are further prohibited from contacting any other third party.  Each and every attempted contact, in violation of this act, will constitute harassment and defamation of character and will subject your agency and/or attorney and any and all agents in his/her individual capacities, who take part in such harassment, and defamation, to a liability for actual damages, as well as statutory damages of up to $1,000 for each and every violation, and a further liability for legal fees to be paid to any counsel which I may retain.  Further, absent such validation of your claim, you are prohibited from filing any notice of lien and/or levy or judgment and are also barred from reporting any derogatory credit information to any credit reporting agency, regarding this disputed purported debt.

Further, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (g) (8), as you are merely an “agency” or other governmental unit of the United States, acting on someone else’s behalf, this is a demand that you provide the name of the original “principal”, or “holder in due course”, for whom you are attempting to collect this alleged debt.

Please take notice that this is a criminal investigation of the business practices of the above named organization or other governmental unit, its agents, officers, employees and attorney to determine violations of the United States criminal laws.  Your enclosed claim of collection of a purported debt appears to be founded upon a false record in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 § 2071 and 2073 (falsifying records) and further; uttering and possessing false obligations and counterfeit securities based upon the falsified records in violation of U.S.C. Title 18 § 471, 472, 473 and/or 513, and further: using corrupt business practices to make and possess false records and claim of obligation, not substantiated by truthful facts in violation of the Federal Racketeer Influences and Corrupt Organization (RICO), U.S.C. Title 18 § 1961 et. seq. and further: using the U.S. Mail to present such fraud and false instruments amounting to Mail Fraud, criminal conduct falling under Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341 – Frauds and Swindles laws, and further sending mail with false and fictitious names, a criminal conduct falling under Title 18 U.S.C. § 1842 – Fictitious Names.

TAKE NOTICE

Debt Collector’s failure in providing Respondent with the requisite verification, validating the above referenced alleged debt within the requirements of law as codified in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Fair Credit Reporting Act and the corresponding laws of each state, signifies that Debt Collector tacitly agrees that:

a. Debt Collector has no lawful, bona fide, verified claim, re the above-referenced alleged account:

b. Debt Collector waives any and all claims against Respondent and

c. Debt Collector tacitly agrees that Debt Collector will compensate Respondent for all costs, fees and expenses incurred in defending against this and any and all continued collection attempts, re the above-referenced alleged account.

d. Failure of Debt Collector to properly and legally verify/validate alleged debt as required in this notice is a self executing irrevocable power of attorney authorizing Respondent/Alleged Debtor named herein to direct the permanent removal, on behalf of the alleged Creditor, of any and all references to said account in any and all credit reporting agency files of any type.

This response will constitute my effort to resolve this on-going debt claim between the parties involved.  Until full disclosure is achieved, there can be no case, collection or action.  “No civil or criminal cause of action can arise lest, out of fraud, there be a valid, honest contract.”  See Eads v. Marks 249 P. 2d 257, 260.

Done this _____Day of ______________ 2010

I declare under penalties of perjury in accordance with the laws of the United States of America (without the “United States”) Title 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1) the forgoing is true and correct and is admitted when not rebutted, so help me.

                                                                                             ______________________________

On the _____ day of ________ 2009 Your Name personally appeared before me in Your County & State and placed his/her signature above.

____________________                          Seal:

Notary Signature

Public Servant Questionnaire

 

This questionnaire must be filled-out by any public servant before he can ask the citizen any question. Federal law, including the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a, 88 Stat. 1896, et seq., 1974, authorizes this.

1. Public servant's full legal name:

2. Public servant's residence address:

3. Name of agency:

4. Full legal name of supervisor and office address:

5. Will you as a public servant uphold the constitution of the United States?

 Yes  No

6. Did public servant provide proof of identity?

 Yes  No

7. ID number:

Badge Number:

Bonding agency and number:

8. Will you as a public servant furnish a copy of the law or regulation that authorizes the action being taken or information requested in this case?

 Yes  No

9. Will you as a public servant provide in writing, that portion of the law authorizing the questions asked?

 Yes  No

10. Are answers voluntary or mandatory?

 Voluntary  Mandatory  ?

11. Are the questions being asked based upon a specific law or regulation, or are they a discovery process?

 

12. What other uses may be made of this information?

13. What other agencies may have access to this information?

14. What will be the effect upon me if I should not choose to answer any or all of these questions?

15. Name of person in government requesting this information:

16. Is this investigation general or special?

Note: by ‘general,’ it means any kind of blanket investigations in which a number of persons are involved because of geography, type of business income, etc. By ‘special,’ it means any investigation of an individual nature in which others are not involved.

17. Have you consulted, questioned, interviewed, or received information from any third party relating to this matter?

 Yes  No

If yes, give identity of all such third parties: (Use back of sheet if more area is needed.)

1. ___________________________________________________________________

2. ___________________________________________________________________

3. ____________________________________________________________________

4. ____________________________________________________________________

18. Do you reasonably anticipate either a civil or criminal action to be initiated or pursued based upon any of the information, which you seek?

 Yes  No

19. Is there a file of records, information, or correspondence relating to me being maintained by this agency?

 Yes  No

20. Is this agency using any information on me, which was supplied, by another agency or government source?

 Yes  No

 

21. Will the public servant guarantee that any other department other than the one by which he is employed will not use the information in these files?

 Yes  No

 

I hereby sign and affirm under the penalty of perjury that the answers are true and correct in every particular.

 

_____________________________________

Signature of public servant

Notice: If any person or agency receives any request for information relating to me, you must advise me in writing before releasing such information. Failure to do so may subject you to possible civil or criminal action as provided by this act or other law(s).

CITATIONS AND OFFERS TO CONTRACT

When a Police Officer issues you a CITATION, he is actually requesting you to CONTRACT with him! He is alleging that you violated a corporate regulation in writing, which you have accepted by signing and thus requires you to respond.
The Police Officer is instructed to explain that your signature is merely an acknowledgment that you received a copy of the CITATION but in actuality, your signature is notification to the Court and Judge that you have accepted or CONSENTED to this offer to CONTRACT, which also grants the Judge CONSENT; PERSONAM and SUBJECT MATTER jurisdiction over you and the case!

You can cancel that CONTRACT however by rescinding your CONSENT. The Federal Truth in Lending Act provides that any party to a CONTRACT may rescind his CONSENT, within three business days of entering into such a CONTRACT. So across the face of the CITATION you should print or type in large print, the following words:
I DO NOT ACCEPT THIS OFFER TO CONTRACT
and
I DO NOT CONSENT TO THESE PROCEEDINGS.
Use blue ink [for admiralty] or purple ink [for royalty]. Admiralty is the Court and Royalty represents your Sovereignty. Either way is appropriate. Sign your signature underneath in blue or purple ink and in front of a Notary and under your signature type: Without prejudice, UCC 1-308. This is another way to declare that you may not be held responsible for this Contract pursuant to the Uniform Commercial Code.
Serve Cancelled Citation back it on the Clerk / Court, along with a Certificate of Service, by Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested. This kills the CITATION; removes your CONSENT and removes the JURISDICTION of the Court, all at the same time. It really is that simple!
NOTE: A Certificate of Service is a letter that first identifies the Citation and then defines how and when you returned the document to the Court and is signed. If not denied, it becomes a truth in commerce by Tacit Procuration.
Remember to keep a copy of everything, in case the Clerk attempts to trash your response, which certainly will not happen with a Certificate of Service or if it is mailed back by the Notary. The Notary is actually a Deputy Secretary of State and is more powerful than the Court Clerk!
Public Notaries originate from the time of the Egyptian and Roman Scribes who were the purveyors of certified documents, which are sworn affidavits. Certified documents and sworn affidavits are truth in commerce. [e.g.] Birth Certificates are certified documents on bonded paper. The word bonded is derived from bondage as in slavery, which makes all of us Bond Slaves to whoever retains custody of our original Birth Certificates. I bet you believed that the Emancipation Proclamation freed the slaves and it did for a short time and then the Birth Certificate and the 14th Amendment enslaved us all!

Traffic Court Procedure Basics

Canada, and the United States are corporations sole

 A corporation sole is a legal entity consisting of a single ("sole") incorporated office, occupied by a single ("sole") natural person.[1][2] This structure allows corporations (often religious corporations or Commonwealth governments) to pass without interruption from one officeholder to the next, giving positions legal continuity with subsequent officeholders having identical powers and possessions to their predecessors. A corporation sole is one of two types of corporation, the other being a corporation aggregate.[3]

Ecclesiastical origins

Most corporations sole are church-related[1] (for example, the archbishopric of Canterbury),[citation needed] although some political offices of the United Kingdom (e.g., many of the secretaries of state), Canada, and the United States are corporations sole.[4]

The concept of corporation sole originated as a means for orderly transfer of ecclesiastical property, serving to keep the title within the denomination or religious society. In order to keep the religious property from being treated as the estate of the vicar of the church, the property was titled to the office of the corporation sole. In the case of the Catholic Church, ecclesiastical property is usually titled to the diocesan bishop, who serves in the office of the corporation sole.

The Catholic Church continues to use corporations sole in holding titles of property: as recently as 2002, it split a diocese in the US state of California into many smaller corporations sole and with each parish priest becoming his own corporation sole, thus limiting the diocese's liability for any sexual abuse or other wrongful activity in which the priest might engage. This is, however, not the case everywhere, and legal application varies. For instance, other U.S. jurisdictions have used corporations at multiple levels.[5][6] In the jurisdictions of England and Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and the Republic of Ireland, a Catholic bishop is not a corporation sole, and real property is held by way of land trusts, a tradition dating back to the suppression of Catholicism by Henry VIII during the English Reformation and the Penal Laws of Ireland.[citation needed]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints uses the corporation sole form for its president, which is legally listed as "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints".[7]

Iglesia ni Cristo was registered as corporation sole with the Insular Government of the Philippines in 1914[8] and with the People's Republic of China in 2014.[citation needed]

The corporation sole form can serve the needs of a religious organization by reducing its complexity to that of a single office and its holder, thereby eliminating the need for by-laws and a board of directors.[citation needed][original research?]

The Crown

Main article: The Crown

Within most constitutional monarchies, notably the Commonwealth realms, the Crown is a nonstatutory corporation sole.[9][10][11][12] Although conceptually speaking, the office and officeholder retain dual capacities in that they may act both in a corporate capacity (as monarch) and in an individual capacity (as a private person), they are inseparably fused in law; there is no legal distinction between the office and the individual person who holds it.[13] The Crown (state) legally acts as a person when it enters into contracts and possesses property.[14] As a person, the monarch (officeholder) may hold properties privately, distinct from property he or she possesses corporately, and may act as monarch separate from their personal acts. For example, Charles III as a natural person holds several separate offices, such as king of the United Kingdom, king of Canada, king of Australia, and the supreme governor of the Church of England, all of which are distinct corporations sole, even as he acts as a natural person in his private capacities separate and apart from his role filling these various offices (corporations). Likewise, the office of prime minister has use of certain properties and privileges, such as an official residence and decision-making powers, that remain with the office once the officeholder leaves, even as the officeholder may own property in a private capacity.[citation needed]

The sovereign's status as a corporation sole ensures that all references to the king, the queen, His Majesty, Her Majesty, and the Crown are synonymous, referring to exactly the same legal personality over time.[15][16] While natural persons who serve as sovereign pass on, the sovereign never legally dies;[17] thus the corporate nature of the office of sovereign ensures that the authority of the state continues uninterrupted.[18] In other words, the sovereign is made a corporation sole to prevent the possibility of disruption or interregnum, thereby preserving the stability of the Crown (state). For this reason, at the moment of the demise of the sovereign, a successor is immediately and automatically in place.[10][19]

As a corporation sole, the legal person of the sovereign is the personification of the state and consequently acts as a guarantor of the rule of law and the fount of all executive authority behind the state's institutions.[20] As Australia and Canada have federal systems of government, the sovereign in these cases also possesses capacities as distinct corporation sole in right of each of the Australian states and Canadian provinces; for example, as His Majesty the King of Australia in Right of Queensland and His Majesty the King of Canada in Right of Alberta.[citation needed]

Secular application in the United States

Every state of the United States recognizes corporations sole under common law, and about a third of the states have specific statutes that stipulate the conditions under which that state recognizes the corporations sole that are filed with that state for acquiring, holding, and disposing of title for church and religious society property.[21][22] Almost any religious society or church can qualify for filing as a corporation sole in these states. There can be no legal limitation to specific denominations, therefore a Buddhist temple or Jewish Community Center would qualify as quickly as a Christian church. Some states also recognize corporations sole for various other non-profit purposes including performing arts groups, scientific research groups, educational institutions, and cemetery societies.[citation needed]

Examples of corporations sole in the United Kingdom

Governmental

The Crown (sometimes regarded as a corporation aggregate)[23]

Administrator of Japanese Property (no longer exists)[24]

Auditor General for Wales[25]

Chief Executive of Skills Funding[26]

Children's Commissioner for England[27]

Children's Commissioner for Wales[28]

Commissioner for Older People for Northern Ireland[29]

Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis

Comptroller and Auditor General

The Corporate Officer of the House of Commons,[30] and the Corporate Officer of the House of Lords,[31] two corporations established by the Parliamentary Corporate Bodies Act 1992

The Dawat-e-Hadiyah[32]

Duke of Cornwall

Duke of Lancaster

Information Commissioner[33]

Mayor (of London)'s Office for Policing and Crime

Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman[23]

Lord Mayor of the City of London[1]

Official Custodian for Charities[34]

Immigration Services Commissioner

Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland[35]

Public Services Ombudsman for Wales

Public Trustee[36]

Pubs Code Adjudicator[37]

Receiver for the Metropolitan Police District[38] (abolished)

Registrar General

many secretaries of state in the United Kingdom (various; most recently Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs)[39]

Solicitor for the affairs of the Duchy of Lancaster[40]

Treasury Solicitor[41]

London Fire Commissioner[42]

Dai al-Mutlaq[43]

In the Church of England

Archbishop of Canterbury[44]

Archbishop of York[44]

Bishops of the Church of England[3][1]

Deans of the Church of England[1]

Rectors and Team Rectors in the Church of England

Vicars in the Church of England[45][46]

Examples of corporations sole in New Zealand

New Zealand Public Trustee

Māori Trustee, New Zealand[47]

New Zealand's Office of the Privacy Commissioner[48]

Examples of corporations sole elsewhere

The Diocese of Hong Kong[49]

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, in the office of its Presiding Bishop[7]

Director of National Parks, Australian government[50]

Governor General of Canada[51]

Minister of the Government, Republic of Ireland

Public Trustee

The Archbishop of Manila

The Archbishop of New York

Office of the sovereign of Canada

The Catholic Bishop of Chicago, A Corporation Sole- The Archdiocese of Chicago

(Former) Administrator of the Southern Electricity Supply of New South Wales

WHAT IS CHECK KITING?

Check kiting is a term applied in a method of floating checks between various bank accounts in a never ending circle. Here is how it works: Suppose Tom, Dick and harry each had a checking account of three different banks, Bank A, Bank B, and Bank C. Tom writes a check for $3,500 from his account at Bank A to Dick. Dick writes a check for $3,500 from his account at Bank B to Harry. And harry writes a check for $3,500 from his account at Bank C to Tom, thus finishing the circle. Together, they have written checks totally three times $3,500 or $10,500. Yet between the three of them there is less than $100 in all three checking accounts.

Will any of the three checks bounce? The answer if "No," unless the banker figures out the scheme. If any of them withdraw the checks for cash, they can be charged with fraud, and just for writing them, they can be charged with check kiting, which is a federal crime. Some check kiting schemes involve millions of dollars of bad checks floating between various accounts, which the depositors suddenly cash in before vanishing with their ill-gotten gains.

E. F. HUTTON

In the summer of 1985, E. F. Hutton gained national notoriety for floating up to $270 million dollars worth of checks each day in what was up until now, the largest check kiting scheme ever perpetuated in the country. E. F. Hutton never cashed the checks, but instead collected an estimated $25 million dollars in interest each year on the checking accounts through which all the bad checks were floating. The Department of Justice, even after a thorough investigation, could find no one to indict, incredible, but true-believe it or not.

THE GAMES PEOPLE PLAY

If a group of people sits down to play a Monopoly games, and only one person (the "banker") has the power to create money, there can be little doubt who will win the Monopoly game. Here's the strategy. The "banker" lends money to the people who want to stay in the game, AND he gets mortgage and security liens against all their personal and real property. The interest he charges for the money he creates and lends out is all gray-virtually all profit and no overhead. Once everyone is in debt to him, he just cuts off their credit and calls in his loans. Because the interest on the loans creates a debt greater than the supply of money to repay it, all the lender does to foreclose on everyone is to stop making new loans. When the existing loans are paid off, the money supply dries up, and prices of land, buildings, and commodities fall. Then, the lender forecloses.

All this is done very smoothly as lenders deprive people of property under color of law.

Taking the Monopoly game from the parlor into today's real life is simple. What is happening is merely a repeat of a script written long ago. We the People, have been conned into a trap, tempted by the lure of money, and have signed our land and freedoms away with contracts that have made us perpetual economic slaves to the lenders. Under our right to contract, we have signed notes, entering ourselves "voluntarily" into a debt dictatorship - although few, if any, of us realize the trap we were led into.

WHO CREATES THE MONEY?

Under the U. S. Constitution in Article 1. Section 8, Congress shall have the power "to coin Money, and regulate the Value thereof." Today money is defined by 31 U.S.C.A., Section 5103, which say, "United States coins and currency....are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes and dues." It is quite clear that the U.S. Government has exclusive power to coin money, and this power has not been delegated by the Constitution to private individuals or corporations. It is important to realize here that evidences of debt are not money, and are not legal tender. Such evidences of debt include: checks, credit cards, lines of credit, demand deposits, credit, letters of credit, and checkbook money. These latter instruments pass as money only as long as people have 

confidence in them. 

DO BANKS CREATE MONEY?

In their own publications, the banks claim they create money. Because money is defined by law as coins or currency, we must look at the evidence to see if they create coins or currency. A close examination of the evidence shows that the banks neither create coins nor currency, as these are exclusive function of the U.S. Government. What, then, do they create? They create something that passes as money, yet isn't real money.

 DID THE LENDER CREATE THE MONEY? OR, DID HE MERELY WRITE A BAD CHECK?

When we looked at what the E. F. Hutton people did, we saw that in a sense they created money and benefited by it. They wrote bad checks which passed as money because Hutton always backed its bad checks with more bad checks in a never ending check kiting scheme. Yet, what difference is there between what E. F. Hutton did and what a commercial bank does on a regular basis? Consider this, "Modern Money Mechanics," published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, says: "The actual process of money creation takes place in commercial banks." "Deposits are merely bank entries." "Banks can build up deposits by increasing loans..." "....bankers discovered that they could, merely by giving borrowers their promises to pay (bank notes.) In this way banks began to create money." "Demand deposits are the modern counterpart of bank notes. It was a small step from printing notes to making book entries in the credit of borrowers which the borrowers, in turn, could spend by writing checks."

A publication by the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, called "Putting it Simply," says "When the Federal Reserve writes a check, it is creating money."

Another publication by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, called "I Bet You Thought," says "This checkbook money is bookkeeping money created mainly by the nation's commercial banks."

Now, you may want to buy the story that the bankers are creating money, but I will not. The courts have clearly decided that checks and evidences of debt are not money. (See Hegeman V. Moon. 131 N.Y. 462.30 NE 487 and/ or State V. Neilen, 73, Pac 321, 43 Ore 158.) IF YOU OR I WRITE A CHECK WITHOUT HAVING THE FULL VALUE IN CASH TO BACK IT UP YOU OR I HAVE WRITTEN A BAD CHECK. IF A BANK WRITES A CHECK WITHOUT THE FULL VALUE IN CASH TO BACK IT UP, THEN THE BANK, TOO, HAS WRITTEN A BAD CHECK. The bank, however, is in a unique position to circulate its bad checks as 'money' by stamping the "PAID" and crediting the depositor's checking or savings account with some book entries. The banks are getting away with this fraudulent activity because most of us don't cash our checks because we use checks and credit cards as substitutes for cash (money). As a result, many banks are making loans up to 33 times the amount of actual money (cash) they have to loan. This technique is known as "fractional reserve banking."

Today the American people have become a party to the check kiting scheme of the bankers by accepting checks and depositing them, and then writing checks against those book entry deposits. We unwittingly help the banks pass on bad checks as "money."

IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United States Government.

 The IRS is not who you think they are. IRS agents are neither trained nor paid by the United States Government.

Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 92, the IRS is trained under the direction of the Division of Human Resources United Nations (U.N.) and the Commissioner (International), by the office of Personnel Management.

In the 1979 edition of 22 USCA 278, "The United Nations," you will find Executive Order 10422. The Office of Personnel Management is under the direction of the Secretary of the United Nations.

Pursuant to Treasury Delegation Order No. 91, the IRS entered into a "Service Agreement" with the US Treasury Department (See Public Law 94-564, Legislative History, pg. 5967, Reorganization (BANKRUPTCY!!!) Plan No. 26)and the Agency for International Development. This agency is an international paramilitary operation and according to the Department of the Army Field manual (1969) 41-10, pgs 1-4, Sec. 1-7 (b) & 1-6, Sec. 1-10 (7)(c) (1), and 22 USCA 284, includes such activities as, "Assumption of full or partial executive, legislative, and judicial authority over a country or area."

The IRS is also an agency/member of a 169 nation pact called the International Criminal Police Organization, or INTERPOL, found at 22 USCA 263a. The memorandum of Understanding, (MOU), between the Secretary of Treasury, AKA the corporate governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank" (International Monetary Fund, and the International Bank for reconstruction and Development), indicated that the Attorney General and its associates are soliciting and collecting information for foreign principals; the international organizations, corporations, and associations, exemplified by 22 USCA 286f.

According to the 1994 US Government Manual, at page 390, the Attorney General is the permanent representative to INTERPOL, and the Secretary of Treasury is the alternate member. Under Article 30 of the INTERPOL constitution, these individuals must expatriate their citizenship.

They serve no allegiance to the United States of America. The IRS is paid by "The Fund" and "The Bank." Thus it appears from the documentary evidence that the Internal Revenue Service agents are "Agents of a Foreign Principle" within the meaning and intent of the "Foreign Agents Registration Act of 1938" for private, not public, gain.

The IRS is directed and controlled by the corporate Governor of "The Fund" and "The Bank." The Federal Reserve Bank and the IRS collection agency are both privately owned and operated under private statutes. The IRS operates under public policy, not Constitutional Law, and in the interest of our nations foreign creditors.

The Constitution only permits Congress to lay and collect taxes. It does not authorize Congress to delegate the tax collection power to a private corporation, which collects our taxes for a private bank, the Federal Reserve, who then deposits it into the Treasury of the IMF.

The IRS is not allowed to state that they collect taxes for the United States Treasury. They only refer to "The Treasury."

For those looking for solutions, here's one.

Like I said before, if you want to protect yourself from being subject to State codes and statutes, you gotta have EQUITY in something. I.e. you buy a car with gold or US coins, so you just didn't give the seller promissory FRN debt notes, but something of ACTUAL (intrinsic) value.

Then you have an EQUITABLE CLAIM, and can argue that the State does NOT have security interest in that car. FYI, when you register your car, the State acquires PERFECTED SECURITY INTEREST in it. I.e. it has a LIEN against it, which is why it can make you obey State Vehicle Code.

But with an equitable claim, you can BAR the State from enforcing its Code against you, or otherwise get a REMEDY against the State, since Equity supersedes Law. That is, even if you lose the legal case against you, you still can get REMEDY in Equity. Here's what lawyers say about equitable claims:

There are two types of claims: legal and equitable. While plaintiffs pursuing a legal claim ask a court to award money, litigants bringing an equitable claim ask a court to either prompt or stop a particular action or event.


Equitable Claims
A plaintiff who seeks equitable relief is asking the court for an injunction. An injunction is a court order compelling a party to do or refrain from doing a specified act.

A court awards an injunction to prevent a future harmful action -- rather than to compensate for a past injury --or to provide relief from harm for which an award of money damages is not a satisfactory solution or for which a monetary value is impossible to calculate.

Example: The Springfield City Council decides to re-zone a parcel of residential land as commercial land. The neighbors, who own homes on the neighboring parcels, are not pleased by this decision. The neighbors can sue the City Council, and ask the court to issue a preliminary or permanent injunction to block the law from taking effect.

In this example the neighbors can't just say we don't like the rezoning, they gotta have a VALID REASON, i.e. an Equitable claim. Such as that the rezoning will harm them, or decrease value of their properties, etc.

So basically, when you buy a car with gold coins, and you're not a resident of their corporate State (no ZIP code in your address), then you could ask the court for injunction against the State, even before you get charged with any traffic violation. And if granted, then the corporate State would be barred from giving you any traffic tickets.

BTW, there already are some people who used injunction to be put on the DO NOT DETAIN list, so that when a cop pulls them over, he sees 'do not detain' in his car computer, and has no choice but to leave them go.

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892

Arthur de Rothschild (1851-1903)

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892 Revealed by US Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh, SR from Minnesota before the US Congress sometime during his term of office between the years of 1907 and 1917 to warn the citizens. "We (the bankers) must proceed with caution and guard every move made, for the lower order of people are already showing signs of restless commotion. Prudence will therefore show a policy of apparently yielding to the popular will until our plans are so far consummated that we can declare our designs without fear of any organized resistance. The Farmers Alliance and Knights of Labor organizations in the United States should be carefully watched by our trusted men, and we must take immediate steps to control these organizations in our interest or disrupt them. At the coming Omaha Convention to be held July 4th (1892), our men must attend and direct its movement, or else there will be set on foot such antagonism to our designs as may require force to overcome. This at the present time would be premature. We are not yet ready for such a crisis. Capital must protect itself in every possible manner through combination (conspiracy) and legislation. The courts must be called to our aid, debts must be collected, bonds and mortgages foreclosed as rapidly as possible. When through the process of the law, the common people have lost their homes; they will be more tractable and easily governed through the influence of the strong arm of the government applied to a central power of imperial wealth under the control of the leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. History repeats itself in regular cycles. This truth is well known among our principal men who are engaged in forming an imperialism of the world. While they are doing this, the people must be kept in a state of political antagonism. The question of tariff reform must be urged through the organization known as the Democratic Party, and the question of protection with the reciprocity must be forced to view through the Republican Party. By thus dividing voters, we can get them to expand their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us, except as teachers to the common herd. Thus, by discrete action, we can secure all that has been so generously planned and successfully accomplished."


THE BANKERS' MANIFESTO OF 1934 From New American, February, 1934. "Capital must protect itself in every way, through combination and through legislation. Debts must be collected and loans and mortgages foreclosed as soon as possible. When through a process of law, the common people have lost their homes, they will be more tractable and more easily governed by the strong arm of the law applied by the central power of wealth, under control of leading financiers. People without homes will not quarrel with their leaders. This is well known among our principle men now engaged in forming an IMPERIALISM of capital to govern the world. By dividing the people we can get them to expend their energies in fighting over questions of no importance to us except as teachers of the common herd. Thus by discrete action we can secure for ourselves what has been generally planned and successfully accomplished."

The Crown

Contrary to what you’ve been intentionally & fraudulently lead to believe, the Crown does not represent the government of Canada, nor the illegitimate German (Saxe-Cobourg & Gotha) Catholic (married Roman Catholic Hitler Youth schooled Philip Battenberg) Queen of England,  Canada and the Commonwealth..  The Crown represents the “corporate entity” of the  Pope; self-proclaimed king of kings. For all intents and purposes, the Crown represents the Vatican Mafia and its “criminal” activities in Canada, the UK and the illegally established 1871 Crown Corporation UNITED STATES (10 square miles District of Columbia)
The Crown ceased to represent the UK and Canadian monarchy when Queen Victoria forfeited the Protestant England throne by marrying her “German” first cousin, “Roman Catholic” First Reich Prince Albert Saxe-Coburg and Gotha.
Immediately upon Queen Victoria illegally marrying a Roman Catholic, violating the Act of Settlement of 1701 law and her coronation oath, Pope Pius IX assumed control of the German monarchy of England, Canada and the Commonwealth and the Bank of England.  On Jan 1, 1855 the Bank of England became a Crown (Pope) Corporation called the “City of London Corporation”.
All Crown Corporations are illegally assumed (via racketeering) “corporate” assets of the Pope, who assumed the title “the Crown” (king of kings) during the First Vatican Council.
The City of London Corporation (the Bank of England; converted to a Crown Corporation on Jan. 1, 1855), the Bank of Canada (converted to a Crown Corporation in 1938), the Federal Reserve (1913 est. Crown Corporation) and the 10 square miles UNITED STATES (became a Crown Corporation in 1871 with the Act of 1871) are all Crown Corporations, illegally acquired by and controlled by the reigning Pope.
Since Queen Victoria’s illegal Roman Catholic marriage, Edward VII, George V, Edward VIII, George VI, Elizabeth II, the UK and Canadian Prime Ministers and Premiers, the President(s) of the 1871 est UNITED STATES (10 sq miles District of Columbia), UK, Canadian and US Supreme Court judges, the Secret Service (SS), the RCMP, the UK, Canadian and US Armed Forces, CSIS, MI5, MI6, the CIA, DHS, IRS, CRA, all betray their country, the rule of law and even their faith, as they all purposely and consciously serve a foreign state and head of state. the “Roman” Catholic Pope.
Because Vatican City is a foreign state & the Crown is the Pope, not the Queen, the Prime Minister(s) & all Crown judges and RCMP (1867 est. “military force” that serves the Crown, not Canada) members are guilty of treason and high treason, Section 46 of the Criminal Code of Canada.  They and any Canadian who serves or served the foreign head of state and our WWI and WWII enemy, the Crown, are traitors – betrayed his or her own country, Canada; aided and abetted our enemy.
Canadian Forces enlisted and RCMP officers are all guilty of high treason and treason against Canada because of the fact that they serve as an armed “military force” for a foreign head of state, the Crown. Their oath of allegiance may be to the illegitimate (forfeited the throne when she married a Roman Catholic and became leader of  the “Order of the Garter” a Roman Catholic military order) Queen of Canada but they do not serve her.  According to Section 36 of the Crown Liability and Proceedings Act under “Agencies and Servants of the Crown“
36. For the purposes of determining liability in any proceedings by or against the Crown, a person who was at any time a member of the Canadian Forces or of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police shall be deemed to have been at that time a servant of the Crown.

Any and all police/security forces member in Canada who bear the Crown symbol on their uniform as part of an insignia and/or badge, are also guilty of high treason and treason against Canada.  The Crown identifies servants of the foreign head of state, the Crown.
High treason
(1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
(b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
(c) assists an enemy (Vatican Second, Third and Fourth Reich) at war with Canada, or any armed forces (Vatican Nazi/NATO forces) against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
Treason
(2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
(a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government (exists to secure the rights of the people and must be based on the consent of the governed) of Canada or a province;
(b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
(c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
(d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
(e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.”
The Catholic Church illegally imposed a latifundia (Mafia) system of governing and justice system in Canada, the United States of America and England after the Catholic Chuch arranged the marriage of Queen Victoria to her first counsin (incest) and Catholic Church First Reich Prince Albert Saxe-Coburg and Gotha (violation of England’s monarchy laws).
The Vatican Mafia was formed by the Egyptian sun god trinity – Isis Horus Seb (IHS) worshipping Jesuits (descendants of the Knights Templar) to illicititly acquire wealth and property for the Pope.
Since Queen Victoria’s unlawful marriage to Roman Catholic First Reich Prince Albert, the Pope, not Jews, has been illegally acquiring wealth via Catholic Church owned Crown Corporations and by taxing the Canadian, USA and UK people under false pretense, false represenation and color of law.
The Catholic Church would have you and I believe that the Crown represents the reigning King or Queen of Canada and the UK when in fact the Crown represents the Pope’s color of law (not law, pretense of law) established temporal authority. The Crown is the “corporate entity” of the reigning Pope, not the Anglo-Saxon monarchy.
The exact date on which the Catholic Church Pope assumed control of Canada, the USA and the UK was Jan 1, 1855. That is the day Pope Pius IX unlawfully seized control of Bank of England by converting the Bank of England into a Vatican Mafia Crown Corportion called the “City of London Corporation”. Before Jan 1, 1855 the reigning Anglo-Saxon “Protestant” monarchy owned and controlled the Bank of England.
From Jan 1, 1855 to present day the Catholic Church Pope has unlawfully taken over and assumed control over the “Protestant” UK monarchy, the UK, Canada and the United States of America through the illicit monetary theft and taxation via the Pope’s Crown Corporation (Vatican Mafia) City of London Corporation.
“He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation.” – James A. Garfield
Since Jan 1, 1855, the Catholic Church Pope (the Crown) has unlawfully assumed control the UK, Canada and the United States of America governments and judiciary system (all judges, presecution and defense lawyers, RCMP in Canada) by controlling the Bank of England (Crown Corporation “City of London Corporation”) under false pretense, false represenation and color of law/right.

Short URL: http://presscore.ca/?p=10855

Accepted for Value tutorial 2023

When you receive a “PRESENTMENT” from anyone (that you have a standing contract with, example account with SS# tied to it) – disregard the concept of a “BILL” you need to pay. That will give you confidence. Realize you don’t owe anyone anything. When your account was set up you gave them some large amount of money from your account and they’ve never compensated you for it.
Look at the “BILL”. Notice there’s a top portion and a bottom “stub” or “payment coupon” – the portion that gets torn off where it says “detach and send with payment.”
To process an “Accepted for Value” formatted item, you always need two instruments, the top of the statement and the bottom of the statement or coupon. (If you pay a $40.00 bill with 2-$20’s; you’ve just sent in 3 instruments, 2-$20’s and the coupon. That’s beyond the 2 instruments required by 1.
NEVER SEND the UPPER AND LOWER parts of the STATEMENT (your 2 instruments) back in the RETURN ENVELOPE THEY’VE PROVIDED for YOU. ALWAYS USE YOUR OWN ENVELOPE AND MARK on the OUTSIDE of the envelope “Private and Confidential”, in red, and to the left side of the (TO: address) and under your return address, put Priority/Confidential, send “Registered Mail with electronic signature confirmation service requested”
OR “Certified/Registered with return Receipt Requested” and mail to the CFO (Chief Financial Officer) of the company you’re tendering your “Accepted for Value” payment documents to.
Could also do the following, I would:1) Cover Letter - send it to the billing origination CFO or someone over your account(s)
2) Fiduciary Contract, with the Form 56 attached; making the CFO or someone Fiduciary of your the account(s).
3) 1040V with all A4V’s.

[KEEP COPIES OF EVERYTHING YOU SEND OUT].
SPECIAL NOTE: If you want to keep the Credit Card Account OPEN – DO NOT make the
payment for the Full amount that you Owe, make it like $10 less.
FORMAT #1 – To MAKE PAYMENT; but Not to Shut Down/Close the Account (i.e., your power bill, water bill).

1. A4V Statement angled corner to corner on the top of the bill (IN RED):
Accepted For Value and Returned For Value
Date:______*, Exemption #_________**
_______________signature________ (do not put Auth. Rep.)

* use date of birth (this date is for the inception of the signature of your Certificate of Live Birth”)
**The Exemption # is found on the back of your SS card, it’s your Bond #. It begins with a Letter then 8 numbers. For example: A12345678. (If your SS card doesn’t have a number on the back, you need to go apply for a new card.
http://www.ssa.gov/online/ss-5.pdf )
2. Take the COUPON/PAYMENT STUB you tore off and in the LOWER RIGHT HAND CORNER, above any numbers that may be there, Sign your “Certificate of Live Birth” name.
3. Find the box where you would write in what amount you’re paying. Pay the total of the invoice; plus add in EXTRA DOLLARS, so that they can’t close the account.
4. TURN the COUPON/PAYMENT STUB OVER and ENDORSE the BACK as you would a check including “Authorized Representative.”
FORMAT #2 – To Close Out/Pay Off an Account (i.e., pay off car, credit cards, mortgage).
1. A4V Statement corner to corner angle on top of statement (IN RED):Accepted For Value and Returned For Value For Settlement, Closure and Setoff
Date:______*, Exemption #_________**
____________signature________ (do not put Auth. Rep.)
2. It is best to contact the company and ask for a PAY-OFF presentment. Then you a Statement to put the A4V wording on.
3. If the PAY-OFF presentment does not have a coupon on the bottom that’s okay, just put the wording A4V on and attach a $1.00 bill. (covers the 2 instruments needed)
4. If this is a purchase that you’ve put a down payment down on, then the contract is binding and you can A4V right away. If you’ve NOT put anything down at the time of purchase, you MUST wait 30 DAYS for the contract to cure. After the 30 days curing, wait another 2-3 weeks then do the A4V process.
FORMAT #3: Statement with no coupon.
1. A4V Statement angled corner to corner on statement (IN RED):
Accepted For Value and Returned For Value
(For Settlement, Closure and Setoff) if it applies
Date:______*, Exemption #_________**
____________signature________ (do not put Auth. Rep.)
2. Send back with $1.00 FRN.
FORMAT #4: IRS issues - (with or without a coupon).
1. A4V Statement angled corner to corner on presentment (IN RED):
Accepted For Value and Returned For Value
For Settlement, Closure and Setoff
Date:______*, Exemption #_________**
________________signature________ (do not put Auth. Rep.)
2. Take a 1040V for the YEAR that the presentment refers too, SIGN in lower right hand corner like a check. Fill in the amount plus extras dollars so they have to send you a refund check. Make it payable to: Department of Treasury.
3. Endorse the back of the 1040V:

By: (your name)___________Auth. Sig.
For Settlement, Closure and Setoff of this Presentment
Payment/Exemption #________(from back of SS card)
4. Send to the Top Person at the Agency. [you choice on addresses] I like the last two.
(Kansas City, for IRS, is supposedly the best for getting them accepted).
(Or IRS, Stop 4440, PO Box 9036, Ogden, UT 84201)
***Presentments for all years except 07 & 08 – IRS, Fresno Campus, ASFR Unit Stop 81404, Po Box 24015,Fresno, CA 93779
***Presentments for years 07 & 08 – IRS, ACS Support Stop 76202, Po Box 24017, Fresno, CA 93779
NEVER write your Social Security number with NO dashes on an A4V statement.
There has never been a BILL; that you were supposed to pay, but you were never told this.
You are the Surety; they are taking their money from you as collateral. You’re paying them twice; if you pay any BILL with anything other than YOUR “Certificate of Live Birth” SIGNATURE on the public side.
The reason we do this is because we are giving the CFO permission to access our DTC account and get “asset” funds to offset the “debt”. FRN’s are liability and public funds, and are just another debt.
We are allowed to do this under the contract we signed with our signature and SS #, for services or whatever.
The CFO is allowed to go to the DTC to offset the account. If you pay by check, money order, etc, you are paying with public/liability funds and the CFO will do a 1099-A on the abandoned credit you neglected to “claim, and you’ll have paid them twice. The CFO is licensed to do an ACH transfer from the private side of the DTC, he’s getting “real” money.
IF THEY DON’T CREDIT THE ACCOUNT with one of the Above A4V PROCESSES AND VOUCHER, THEN SEND IT BACK WITH A FORM 28 ONLY. THEY CAN’T REBUT THE AFFIDAVIT, AND IT STANDS AS GOOD UNDER CONTRACT LAW.
OR
Follow-up with:
[This item can be done now or later] Send them the following items to address the settlement of past payments made out of your back pocket - 2nd payment and you demand settlement (three years for everything not tied to a promissory note) or (from life of contract signing if it was under a promissory note); [understand these forms before you use them please]
a. 1099-A (for each year you made payments out of your back pocket)
b. 1099-OID (them as the Payer and the amount that has WITHHELD from you)
Always TIE these forms together so they cannot be separated. (tie - means to refer to each document on each one)
c. Sf-28 - AFFIDAVIT OF INDIVIDUAL SURETY
d. Op-90 - RELEASE OF LIEN ON REAL (ONLY IF NEEDED)
e. Op-91 - PROPERTY RELEASE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM ESCROW
IF they still do not accept and settle, then file a 3949A IRS form on them and send the package to
the IRS/CID.

This is one place to send to CID !! Check them all out though.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION DIVISION
BOX 192
COVINGTON, KY 41012

Take back control of your estate

TOP THINGS THE BANKS DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW

Did you know that the FDIC doesn't really insure bank accounts?

Did you know that when a bank goes under and is taken over by the FDIC, instead of paying the $100,000, the FDIC just pays its own people to come into the bank and divvy up what's left of the bank's assets? (This comes from a woman who once worked as a temp for the FDIC. Her job was to talk on the phone to the angry depositors and explain this to them.)

Did you know that a bank cannot legally require a fingerprint as a condition of cashing a check?
According to UCC 3-501(b)(2), they can only require you to:
Exhibit the instrument (i.e. you show them the check)
Give reasonable identification, and evidence of your authority if you are cashing the check on behalf of someone else
Sign the check, and make a written receipt for partial payment, or the surrender of the check upon full payment (i.e. you let them keep the check)
They write the brochures to say that they "ask" for a fingerprint (not "demand" as a condition of payment). Their excuse for the fingerprint is "reasonable identification." So if you can get them to agree that your picture ID is reasonable identification, they have NO LAWFUL EXCUSE for refusing to pay the check just because you don't give them a fingerprint! In this case they have "dishonored" the check and you can proceed exactly as you would if they blatantly, and for no reason, refused to pay. Contact us for ideas on how to use the fingerprint issue.

Did you know that if you write “Without Recourse” below your endorsement or signature that the bank can not take any action against you for any reason!

Did you know that banks do not loan their own assets, nor the assets of their depositors?
Do you realize this means they do NOT loan money, but instead, there is an exchange of credit for credit, in which interest is charged on one side, but not the other?
If the borrower walks away with cash (which has value in the form of "purchasing power"), but the bank didn't loan any of its assets, isn't it obvious that the "purchasing power" must have come from SOMEWHERE?

Did you know that when a bank makes a "loan," the money supply (M1) expands -- in other words, the volume of currency in circulation increases?

Did you know that the value of the Federal Reserve Note "dollar" depends on the size of the money supply via the law of "supply and demand" -- in other words, the more FRNs there are, the less they are worth?

Do you understand that when the bank makes a loan, the value of the FRN "dollar bills" in everybody's pocket declines -- in other words, the bank is creating FRN dollars in competition with the FRN "dollars" in your pocket, and this reduces the value of the FRN "dollars" in your  pocket? Do you realize this is the cause of inflation?

Do you realize that this means the "value," or "purchasing power," loaned by the bank is essentially STOLEN from the public via the mechanism of inflation? Contact us for ideas on how to use the "Theft by Inflation" issue

1. Always Pursue Truth - unless something better comes along.
2.  There is No Deception so great as-- Self-deception, see # 1.

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=4XGFACJDZK2AJ

Queen Elizabeth controls and has amended U.S. Social Security, as follows:

         S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At
the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her
Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security
Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf,
is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is
hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America)
Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."

    Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to
redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United
States Law.

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/contents/made

    Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince Elector of the
Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of
Peace (1738) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for
the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'

            What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers
and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to
there knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a
debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED
STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See
Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)

        Now, you also have to realize that King George was not just the King
of England, he was also the King of France. Treaty of Peace * U.S. 8 Statutes
at Large 80.

             On January 22, 1783 Congress ratified a contract for the
repayment of 21 loans that the UNITED STATES had already received dating from
February 28, 1778 to July 5, 1782. Now the UNITED STATES Inc. owes the King
money which is due January 1, 1788 from King George via France. Is this not
incredible the King funded both sides of the War. But there was more work
that needed to be done. Now the Articles of Confederation which was declared
in force March 1, 1781 States in Article 12 " All bills of credit emitted,
monies borrowed,and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress,
before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present
confederation, shall be deemed and considered a charge against the United
States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the
public faith are hereby solemnly pledged."

        Now after losing the Revolutionary War, even though the War was
nothing more than a move to turn the people into debtors for the King, they
were not done yet.

        Now the loans were coming due and so a meeting was convened in
Annapolis, Maryland, to discuss the economic instability of the country under
the Articles of Confederation. Only five States come to the meeting,  but
there is a call for another meeting to take place in Philadelphia the
following year with the express purpose of revising the Articles of
Confederation

       On February 21, 1787 Congress gave approval of the meeting to take
place in Philadelphia on May 14, 1787, to revise the Articles of
confederation. Something had to be done about the mounting debt. Little did
the people know that the so called founding fathers were acutely going to
reorganize the United States because it was Bankrupt.

       On September 17, 1787 twelve State delegates approve the Constitution.
The States have now become Constitutors.  Constitutor: In the civil law, one
who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's
debt. Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed. The States were now liable for the debt
owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a
party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote On
August 4th, 1790 an Act was passed which was Titled.-An Act making provision
for the payment of the Debt of the United States. This can be found at 1 U.S.
Statutes at Large pages 138-178. This Act for all intents and purposes
abolished the States and Created the Districts. If you don't believe it look
it up. The Act set up Federal Districts, here in Pennsylvania we got two. In
this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was
for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This
had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the
debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for
a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to
people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great
Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso
facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional
entity and it is synonymous with subject.

        What you think is a state is in reality a corporation, in other
words, a Person.
                
"Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is Person." 9 F. Supp 272
"Word "person" does not include state. 12 Op Atty Gen 176.

      There are no states, just corporations. Every body politic on this
planet is a corporation. A corporation is an artificial entity, a fiction at
law. They only exist in your mind. They are images in your mind, that speak
to you. We labor, pledge our property and give our children to a fiction.

Now before we go any further let us examine a few things in the Constitution.

         Article six section one keeps the loans from the King valid it
states; All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the
Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States
under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

           Another interesting tidbit can be found at Article One Section
Eight clause Two which states that Congress has the power to borrow money on
the credit of the United States. This was needed so the United States (Which
went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because
the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.
 
         The next underhanded move was the creation of The United States Bank
in 1791. This was a private Bank of which there were 25,000 shares issued of
which 18,000 were held by those in England. The Bank loaned the United States
money in exchange for Securities of the United States

          Now the creditors of the United States which included the King
wanted paid the Interest on the loans that were given to the United States.
So Alexander Hamilton came up with the great idea of taxing alcohol. The
people resisted so George Washington sent out the militia to collect the tax
which they did. This has become known as the Whiskey rebellion. It is the
Militia's duty to collect taxes. How did the United States collect taxes off
of the people if the people are not a party to the Constitution? I'll tell
you how. The people are slaves!  The United States belongs to the floundering
fathers and their posterity and Great Britain. America is nothing more than a
Plantation. It always has been. How many times have you seen someone in court
attempt to use the Constitution and then the Judge tells him he can't. It is
because you are not a party to it. We are SLAVES!!!!!!!  If you don't believe
read Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah.
14 Georgia 438, 520 which states " But, indeed, no private person has a right
to complain, by  suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the
Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is
not a party to it."

        Now back to the Militia. Just read Article One Section Eight clause
(15) which states that it is the militia's job to execute the laws of the
Union.  Now read Clause (16) Which states that Congress has the power to
provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining the Militia, and for
governing such part of them as may be employed in the service of the United
States.... the Militia is not there to protect you and me, it is their to
collect our substance.

         As you can plainly see all the Constitution did is set up a Military
Government to guard the King's commerce and make us slaves.

    If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find "The Treaty
of Amity, Commerce and Navigation. This Treaty was signed on November 19th,
1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states
that the King's Troops were still occupying the United States. Being the nice
King that he was , he decided that the troops would return to England by June
1st, 1796. The troops were still on American soil because, quite frankly the
King wanted them here.

Here is the key to were this started:

Many people tend to blame the Jews  for our problems. Jewish Law governs the
entire world, as found in Jewish Law by MENACHEM ELON, DEPUTY PRESIDENT
SUPREME COURT OF ISRAEL, to wit:

            "Everything in the Babylonian Talmud is binding on all Israel.
Every town and country must follow all customs, give effect to the decrees,
and carry out the enactment's of the Talmudic sages, because the entire
Jewish people accepted everything contained in Talmud. The sages who adopted
the enactment's and decrees, instituted the practices, rendered the
decisions, and derived the laws, constituted all or most of the Sages of
Israel. It is they who received the tradition of the fundamentals of the
entire Torah in unbroken succession going back to Moses, our teacher."

    We are living under what the Bible calls Mammon. As written in the
subject Index, Mammon is defined as ("Civil law and procedure").

    Now turn to the "The Shetars Effect on English Law" -- A Law of the Jews
Becomes the Law of the Land, found in "The George Town Law Journal, Vol 71:
pages 1179-1200." It is clearly stated in the Law Review that the Jews are
the property of the Norman and Anglo-Saxon Kings. It also explains that the
Talmud is the law of the land. It explains how the Babylonian Talmud became
the law of the land, which is now known as the Uniform Commercial Code. The
written credit agreement -- the Jewish shetar is a lien on all property
(realty) and today it's called the mortgage! The treatise also explains that
the Jews are owned by Great Britain and the Jews are in charge of the Baking
system.
               We are living under the Babylonian Talmud, it is were all of
our problems come from. It was brought into England in 1066 and has been
enforced by the Pope, Kings and the Christian churches ever since. It is
total and relentless mind control, people are taught to believe in things
that do not exist.

      Now before you scream that the UCC is unconstitutional I'm sorry
people, you are not a party to any constitution. Read the case cite below.

    "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in
court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution it is
true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it." Padelford, Fay & Co., vs.
Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah 14 Ga. 438, 520

        You have to understand that Great Britain,(Article six Section one)
the United States and the States are the parties to the Constitution not you.
Let me try to explain. If I buy an automobile from a man and that automobile
has a warranty and the engine blows up the first day I have it. Then I tell
the man just forget about it. Then you come along and tell the man to pay me
and he says no. So you take him to court for not holding up the contract. The
court then says case dismissed. Why ? Because you are not a party to the
contract. You cannot sue a government official for not adhering to a contract
(Constitution) that you are not a party too. You better accept the fact that
you are a Slave. When you try to use the Constitution you are committing a
CRIME known as CRIMINAL TRESPASS. Why ? Because you are attempting to
infringe on a private contract that you are not a party to. Then to make
matters worse you are a debt slave who owns no property or has any rights.
You are a mere user of your Masters property! Here are just a couple of
examples:
              
"The primary control and custody of infant is with the government"
Tillman V. Roberts. 108 So. 62

" Marriage is a civil contract to which there are three parties-the husband,
the wife and the state."  Van Koten v. Van Koten. 154 N.E. 146.

"The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State: individual
so-called "ownership" is only by virtue of Government, i.e. law amounting
to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to
the necessities of the State. Senate Document No. 43 73rd Congress 1st
Session. (Brown v. Welch supra) You own no Property because you are a
slave. Really you are worse off than a slave because you are also a debtor.

"The right of traffic or the transmission of property, as an absolute
inalienable right, is one  which has never existed since governments were
instituted, and never can exist under government."  Wynehamer v. The People.
13 N.Y. Rep.378, 481

 Great Britain to this day collects taxes from the American people. The IRS
is not an Agency of the United States Government.

         All taxpayers have an Individual Master File which is in code. By
using IRS Publication 6209, which is over 400 pages, there is a blocking
series which shows the taxpayer the type of tax that is being paid. Most
taxpayers fall under a 300-399 blocking series, which 6209 states is
reserved, but by going to BMF 300-399 which is the Business Master File in
6209 prior to 1991, this was U.S.-U.K. Tax Claims, meaning taxpayers are
considered a business and involved in commerce and are held liable for taxes
via a treaty between the U.S. and the U.K., payable to the U.K. The form that
is supposed to be used for this is form 8288, FIRPTA-Foreign Investment Real
Property Tax Account. The 8288 form is in the Law Enforcement Manual of the
IRS, chapter 3. The OMB's-paper-Office of Management and Budget, in the
Department of Treasury, List of Active Information collections, Approved
Under Paperwork Reduction Act is where form 8288 is found under OMB number
1545-0902, which says U.S. with holding tax return for dispositions by
foreign persons, of U.S. Form #8288, #8288a.

    These codes have since been changed to read as follows: IMF 300-309,
Barred Assessment, CP 55 generated valid for MFT-30, which is the code for
the 1040 form. IMF 310-399 reads the same as IMF 300-309, BMF 390-399 reads
U.S.-U.K. Tax Treaty Claims. Isn't it INCREDIBLE that a 1040 form is a
payment of a tax to the U.K. Everybody is always looking to 26 U.S.C. for the
law that makes one liable for the so called Income Tax but, it is not in
there because it is not a Tax, it is debt collection through a private
contract called the Constitution of the United States Article Six, Section
One. and various agreements. Is a cow paying an income tax when the machine
gets connected to it's udders ? The answer is no. I have never known a cow
that owns property or has been compensated for its labor. You own nothing
that your labor has ever produced. You don't even own your labor or yourself.
Your labor is measured in current credit money. You are allowed to retain a
small portion of your labor so that you can have food, clothing shelter and
most of all breed more slaves. Did you ever notice how many of the other
slaves get upset if you try to retain your labor. You are called an
extremist, terrorist and sometimes even a freeman. They say that you are
anti-government. When the truth of the matter is you just don;t want to be a
slave. But, you do not have the right to force others to be free if they want
to be a slave that is entirely up to them. If they want  bow down and worship
corporations, let them. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope are not
the problem, it is the other slaves. We would be free if the
want-to-be-slaves were gone. The United States, Great Britain and the Pope
would not even exist, because no one would acknowledge them. I for a matter
of fact, think that those who are in power are also tired of the slaves. All
the slaves do is stand around and MOO!!! For free healthcare, free education,
free housing and they beg those who are in power to disarm them I do agree
that a slave should not have access to a firearm.  How can you disagree with
the government passing out birth control ? I hope the breeding of slaves
stops or at the very least slows down.

   You see we are  cows, the IRS is company who milks the cows and the United
States Inc. is the veterinarian who takes care of the herd and Great Britain
is the Owner of the farm in fee simple. The farm is held in allodium by the
Pope.

    Now to Rome.
    "Convinced that the principles of religion contribute most powerfully to
keep nations in the state of passive obedience which they owe to their
princes, the high contracting parties declare it to be their intention to
sustain in their respective states, those measures which the clergy may adopt
with the aim of ameliorating their interests, so intimately connected with
the preservation of the authority of the princes; and the contracting powers
join in offering their thanks to the Pope for what he has already done for
them, and solicit his constant cooperation in their views of submitting the
nations." Article (3) Treaty of Varona (1822)

    If the Sovereign Pontiff should nevertheless, insist on his law being
observed he must be obeyed. Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n.
4. Prati, 1844. Pontifical laws moreover become obligatory without being
accepted or confirmed by secular rulers. Syllabus, prop. 28, 29, 44. Hence
the jus nationale,(Federal Law) or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws
prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign
Pontiff. Elements of Ecclesiastical Law. Vol. I 53-54. So could this be shown
that the Pope rules the world?
    The Pope is the ultimate owner of everything in the World. See Treaty of
1213, Papal Bull of 1455 and 1492.

        I could go on and on, this is just the tip of the iceberg. Don't let
this information scare you because without it you cannot be free,  You have
to understand that all slavery and freedom originates in the mind. When your
mind allows you to accept and understand that the United States, Great
Britain and the Vatican are corporations which are nothing but fictional
entities which have been placed into your mind, you will understand that your
slavery was because you believed a lie.
S.A.