Unsecured Debt Can Be Terminated

Debts can be purged using the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Credit history
can be restored by using the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Creditors can be defended
against with knowledge of simple contract law, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, rules of court and the basis that banks do not loan anything. Debt
collectors can be defended against with the basis that an assignee cannot
establish any contractual nexus to enforce a claim.
Banks are prohibited from loaning. They can’t loan other depositor’s money
because of the matching principle under GAAP. They can’t loan out nor risk any of
their own assets because of Federal Reserve regulations.
In order to accept a credit application or promissory note, the banks must convert
the customer’s note into a check and give it back to him. Only they can do this
because they have a monopoly on negotiable instruments. It is the customer who
creates the currency and funds the line of credit to himself. The customer is the
depositor (creditor). The banks conceal this fact by carrying out what appears to
be a loan approval process for each customer. There is no loan from the bank.
The object in defending yourself against a creditor that has not assigned the
account to a debt collector is to manipulate the creditor into a new agreement
and/or force the account into collections.
The creditor can be sent a notice of final payment with the expectation that the
creditor will not dispute the payment or its terms in writing, thereby accepting it
as payment in full. When the final payment is accepted, and the creditor has
failed to respond or object to the notice of final payment, it makes it very difficult
for them to maintain a claim against the account holder.
In practice, the creditor will call you to ask about late payments. It is prudent to
take a record of the caller’s name, company, mailing address, and phone and fax
numbers, date and time of call, and then request that the caller limit
communications with you only to writing. It is best to disconnect the call after
obtaining this information and then to send a written correspondence making the
same request.
If the calls continue, you can do this again or make a complaint with your state’s
attorney general’s office.
In most cases, the creditor will assign the account to collections. Once this
happens, the third party collection efforts are regulated under the Fair Debt
Collections Practices Act.
The debt can be assigned, but that doesn’t automatically mean that you have a
contract with the new 3rd party debt collector; in fact you don’t as long as you
don’t contract with them by acquiescence.
The third party assignee usually has no agreement with the debtor, so in order to
recover the loss that it chose to incur; it needs the debtor’s consent. This is
usually obtained by deceit, by tricking the debtor into accepting a new obligation.
You can request from them a validation of the purported debt. This they’re not
going to be able to fully respond to – the collector never provided any services or
products, neither is there an automatic obligation for you to pay.
When the collector responds with anything but some written agreement, evidence
of your consent or evidence of consideration (e.g. payment), they have failed to
validate.
Most collectors who receive this request will never pursue the collection.
If the collector persists in ignoring your request for validation, a complaint to the
Federal Trade Commission may be appropriate. Just listing the address for the
FTC on the second notice is likely to get positive results.
The Commerce Game Exposed
ON APRIL 5, 1933, then president Franklin Delano Roosevelt, under Executive
Order, issued April 5, 1933, declared: "All persons are required to deliver ON OR
BEFORE MAY 1, 1933 all GOLD COIN, GOLD BULLION, AND GOLD CERTIFICATES
now owned by them to a Federal Reserve Bank, branch or agency, or to any
member bank of the Federal Reserve System." James A. Farley, Postmaster
General at that time, required each postmaster in the country to post a copy of
the Executive Order in a conspicuous place within each branch of the Post Office.
On the bottom of the posting was the following: CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR
VIOLATION OF EXECUTIVE ORDER $10, 000 fine or 10 years imprisonment, or
both, as provided in Section 9 of the order Section 9 of the order reads as
follows: “Whosoever willfully violates any provisions of this Executive Order or of
these regulations or of any rule, regulation or license issued there under may be
fined not more than $10,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not
more than 10 years, or both; and any officer, director or agency of any
corporation who knowingly participates in any such violation may be punished by
a like fine, imprisonment, or both. NOTE: Stated within a written document
received September 17, 1997, from the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of
Legal Counsel, Office of the Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Richard L. Shiffin,
in response to a FOIA, was the following: "A fact that is frequently overlooked is
that Executive orders and proclamations of the President normally have no direct
effect upon private persons or their property, and instead, normally constitute
only directives or instructions to officers or employees of the Federal Government.
The exception is those cases in which the President is expressly authorized or
required by laws enacted by the Congress to issue an Executive order or
proclamation dealing with the legal rights or obligations of members of the public;
such as issuance of Selective Service Regulations, establishment of boards to
investigate certain labor disputes, and establishment of quotas or fees with
respect to certain imports into this country." NOTE: IT SEEMS RATHER OBVIOUS
THAT PRESIDENT FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT WAS NOT "EXPRESSLY AUTHORIZED
OR REQUIRED” TO "ISSUE AN EXECUTIVE ORDER OR PROCLAMATION"
DEMANDING THE PUBLIC (PRIVATE) TO RELINQUISH THEIR PRIVATELY HELD
GOLD. The order (proclamation) issued by Roosevelt was an undisciplined act of
treason. Two months AFTER the Executive Order, on June 5, 1933, the Senate
and House of Representatives, 73d Congress, 1st session, at 4:30 p.m. approve
House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192: Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard
and Abrogate the Gold Clause, Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the
coins and currencies of the United States. HJR-192 states, in part, that:
"Every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which
purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind
of coin or currency, or in any amount of money of the United States measured
thereby, is declared to be against public policy, and no such provision shall be
contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every
obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provisions is
contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon
payment, dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency which at the time of
payment is legal tender for public and private debts."
HJR-192 goes on to state:
"As used in this resolution, the term ‘obligation’ means an obligation (including
every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in
money of the United States; and the term ‘coin or currency’ means coin or
currency of the United States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating
notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations."
HJR-192 superseded Public Law (what passes as law today is only "color of law”),
replacing it with public policy. This eliminated our ability to PAY our debts,
allowing only for their DISCHARGE. When we use any commercial paper (checks,
drafts, warrants, federal reserve notes, etc.), and accept it as money, we simply
pass the unpaid debt attached to the paper on to others, by way of our purchases
and transactions. This unpaid debt, under public policy, now carries a public
liability for its collection. In other words, all debt is now public. The United States
government, in order to provide necessary goods and services, created a
commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labor, life and body
of its citizens, as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made
chattel (property) out of every man, woman and child in the United States. We
became nothing more than "human resources" and collateral for the debt. This
was without our knowledge and/or our consent.
How? It was done through the filing (registration) of our birth certificates! The
United States government - actually the elected and appointed administrators of
government -took (and still do, to this day) certified copies of all our birth
certificates and placed them in the United States Department of Commerce ... as
registered securities. These securities, each of which carries an estimated
$1,000,000 (one million) dollar value, have been (and still are) circulated around
the world as collateral for loans, entries on the asset side of ledgers, etc., just like
any other security. There's just one problem, we didn't authorize it.
The United States is a District of Columbia corporation. In Volume 20: Corpus
Juris Sec. § 1785 we find "The United States government is a foreign corporation
with respect to a State" (see: NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 1441 S. 0.1973, 14 L.
Ed. 287). Since a corporation is a fictitious "person" (it can not speak, see, touch,
smell, etc.), it can not, by itself, function in the real world. It needs a conduit, a
transmitting utility, a liaison of some sort, to "connect" the fictional person, and
fictional world in which it exists, to the real world.
Why is this important? LIVING people exist in a real world, not a fictional, virtual
world. But government does exist in a fictional world, and can only deal directly
with other fictional or virtual persons, agencies, states, etc. In order for a fictional
person to deal with real people there must be a connection, a liaison, a gobetween.
This can be something as simple as a contract. When both "persons,"
the real and the fictional, agree to the terms of a contract, there is a connection,
intercourse, dealings, there is a communication, an exchange. There is business!
But there is another way for fictional government to deal with the real man and
woman: through the use of a representative, a liaison, the go-between. Who is
this go-between, this liaison that connects fictional government to real men and
women? It's a government created shadow, a fictional man or woman ... with the
same name as ours. This PERSON was created by using our birth certificates as
the MCO (manufacturer's certificate of origin) and the state in which we were
born as the "port of entry." This gave fictional government a fictional PERSON
with whom to deal directly. This PERSON is a STRAWMAN. STRAMINEUS HOMO:
Latin: A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety. This
definition comes from Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition, page 1421. Following
the definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO in Black's we find the next word
STRAWMAN:
A front, a third party who is put up in name only to take part in a transaction.
Nominal party to a transaction; one who acts as an agent for another for the
purposes of taking title to real property and executing whatever documents and
instruments the principal may direct. Person who purchases property for another
to conceal identity of real purchaser or to accomplish some purpose otherwise not
allowed.
Webster's Ninth New Collegiate Dictionary defines the term "STRAWMAN" as:
1: a weak or imaginary opposition set up only to be easily confuted
2: a person set up to serve as a cover for a usually questionable transaction.
The STRAWMAN can be summed up as an imaginary, passive stand-in for the real
participant; a front; a blind; a person regarded as a nonentity. The STRAWMAN is
a "shadow," a go-between. For quite some time a rather large number of people
in this country have known that a man or woman's name, written in ALL CAPS, or
last name first, does not identify real, living people. Taking this one step further,
the rules of grammar for the English language have no provisions for the
abbreviation of people's names, i.e. initials are not to be used. As an example,
John Adam Smith is correct. ANYTHING else is not correct. Not Smith, John Adam
or Smith, John A. or J. Smith or J. A. Smith or JOHN ADAM SMITH or SMITH,
JOHN or any other variation. NOTHING, other than John Adam Smith identifies
the real, living man. All other appellations identify either a deceased man or a
fictitious man: such as a corporation or a STRAWMAN.
Over the years government, through its "public" school system, has managed to
pull the wool over our eyes and keep us ignorant of some very important facts.
Because all facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing
influence in our lives, and because media is controlled (with the issuance of
licenses, etc.) by government and its agencies, we have slowly and systematically
been led to believe that any form/appellation of our names is, in fact, still us: as
long as the spelling is correct. WRONG! We were never told, with full and open
disclosure, what our government officials were planning to do ... and why. We
were never told that government (the United States) was a corporation, a
fictitious "person." We were never told that government had quietly, almost
secretly, created a shadow, a STRAWMAN for each and every AMERICAN...so that
government could not only "control" the people, but also raise an almost
unlimited amount of revenue - so it could continue ... not just to exist, but to
GROW. We were never told that when government deals with the STRAWMAN it is
not dealing with real, living, men and women. We were never told, openly and
clearly with full disclosure of all the facts, that since June 5, 1933, we have been
unable to pay our debts. We were never told that we had been pledged (and our
children, and their children, and their children, and on and on) as collateral, mere
chattel, for the debt created by government officials who committed treason in
doing so. We were never told that they quietly and cleverly changed the rules,
even the game itself, and that the world we perceive as real is in fact fictional
-and it's all for their benefit. We were never told that the STRAWMAN - a fictional
person, a creature of the state -is subject to all the codes, statutes, rules,
regulations, ordinances, etc. decreed by government, but that WE, the real man
and woman, are not. We were never told we were being treated as property, as
slaves (albeit comfortably for some) while living in the land of the free; and that
we could, easily, walk away from the fraud. WE WERE NEVER TOLD WE WERE
BEING ABUSED!
How does that make YOU feel? There's something else you should know:
Everything, since June 1933, operates in COMMERCE! Why is this important?
Commerce is based on agreement, contract. Government has an implied
agreement with the STRAWMAN (government's creation) and the STRAWMAN is
subject to government rule, as we illustrated above. But when we, the real flesh
and blood man and woman, step into their "process" we become the "surety" for
the fictional STRAWMAN. Reality and fiction are reversed. We then become liable
for the debts, liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN, relinquishing our real
(protected) character as we stand up for the fictional STRAWMAN. So that we can
once again place the STRAWMAN in the fictional world and ourselves in the real
world (with all our "shields" in place against fictional government) we must send
a nonnegotiable (private) "Charge Back" and a nonnegotiable "Bill of Exchange"
to the United States Secretary of Treasury, along with a copy of our birth
certificate, the evidence, the MCO, of the STRAWMAN. By doing this we discharge
our portion of the public debt, releasing us, the real man, from the debts,
liabilities and obligations of the STRAWMAN. Those debts, liabilities and
obligations exist in the fictional commercial world of "book entries," on computers
and/or in paper ledgers. It is a world of "digits" and "notes," not of money and
substance. Property of the real man once again becomes tax exempt and free
from levy, as it must be in accord with HJR-192. Sending the nonnegotiable
Charge Back and Bill of Exchange accesses our Private Exemption Account. What
is that? Let's go to Title 26 USC and take a look at section 163(h)(3)(B)(ii),
$1,000,000 limitation:
"The aggregate amount treated as acquisition indebtedness for any period shall
not exceed $1,000,000 ($500,000 in the case of a married individual filing a
separate return).”
This $1,000,000 (one million) account is for the STRAWMAN, the fictional
"person" with the name in all caps and/or last name first. It is there for the
purpose of making book entries, to move figures, "digits" from one side of ledgers
to the other. Without constant movement a shark will die and quite ironically, like
the shark, there must also be constant movement in commerce, or it too will die.
Figures, digits, the entries in ledgers must move from asset side to debit side and
back again, or commerce dies. No movement, no commerce. The fictional
persona of government can only function in a fictional commercial world, one
where there is no real money, only fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits.
A presentment from fictional government - from traffic citation to criminal
charges - is a negative, commercial "claim" against the STRAWMAN. This "claim"
takes place in the commercial, fictional world of government. "Digits" move from
one side of your STRAWMAN account to the other, or to a different account. This
is today's commerce. In the past we have addressed these "claims" by fighting
them in court, with one "legal process" or another, and failed. We have played the
futile, legalistic, dog-and-pony show - a very clever distraction - while the
commerce game played on. But what if we refused to play dog-and-pony, and
played the commerce game instead? What if we learned how to control the flow
and movement of entries, figures and digits, for our own benefit? Is that possible?
And if so, how? How can the real man in the real world, function in the fictional
world in which the commerce game exists? When in commerce do as commerce
does, use the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). The UCC-1 Financing Statement
is the one contract in the world that can NOT be broken and it's the foundation of
the Accepted for Value process. The power of this document is awesome. Since
the private exemption account exists for the STRAWMAN - who, until now, has
been controlled by government - We can gain control (and ownership) of the
STRAWMAN by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement and activating our private
exemption account. By properly filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement we become
the holder in due course of the STRAWMAN. By activating the account we gain
limited control over the funds in the account. This allows us to also move entries,
figures and digits ... for our benefit. This gives us virtual ownership of the
government created entity.
So what? What does it all mean? Remember earlier we mentioned that a
presentment from government or one of its agents or agencies was a negative
commercial claim against the STRAWMAN (and the STRAWMAN’s account)?
Remember we told you entries, figures and digits moved from one side of the
account to the other, or to a different account? Well now, with the STRAWMAN
under our control, government has no presumable direct access to the personal
exemption account and they also lose their go-between, their liaison, their
"connection" to the real, living man and woman. From now on, when presented
with a "claim" (presentment) from government, we will agree with it (this
removes the “controversy”) and we will ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE. By doing this we
remove the negative claim against our account and become the "holder in due
course" of the presentment. As holder in due course you can require the sworn
testimony of the presenter of the "claim" (under penalty of perjury) and request
the account be properly adjusted. It's all business, a commercial undertaking, and
the basic procedure is not complicated. In fact, it's fairly simple. We just have to
remember a few things, like: this is not a "legal" procedure - we're not playing
dog-and-pony. This is commerce, and we play by the rules of commerce. We
accept the "claim," become the holder in due course, and challenge whether or
not the presenter of the claim had/has the proper authority (the Order) to make
the claim (debit our account) in the first place. When they cannot produce the
Order (they never can, it was never issued) we request the account be properly
adjusted (the charge, the "claim” goes away). If they don't adjust the account a
request is made for the bookkeeping records showing where the funds in question
were assigned. This is done by requesting the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the
Fiduciary Tax Return for this claim. Since the claim has been accepted for value
and is prepaid, and our personal exemption account is exempt from levy, the
request for the Fiduciary Tax Estimate and the Fiduciary Tax Return is valid
because the information is necessary in determining who is delinquent and/or is
making claims on the account. If there is no record of the Fiduciary Tax Estimate
and the Fiduciary Tax Return, we then request the individual tax estimates and
individual tax returns to determine if there is any delinquency. If we receive no
favorable response to the above requests, we will then file a currency report on
the amount claimed/assessed against our account and begin the commercial
process that will force them to either do what's required or lose everything they
own -except for the clothing they are wearing at the time. This is the power of
contracts (commerce) and it should be mentioned, at least this one time, that a
contract overrides the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and any other document
other than another contract. We should also mention that no process of law
-"color" of law under present codes, statutes, rules, regulations, ordinances, etc.
- can operate upon you, no agent and/or agency of government (including courts)
can gain jurisdiction over you, WITHOUT YOUR CONSENT. You, (we) are not
within their fictional commercial venue. The Accepted for Value process, however,
gives us the ability to deal with "them" -through the use of our transmitting
utility/go-between, the STRAWMAN - and hold them accountable in their own
commercial world, for any action(s) they attempt to take against us. Without a
proper Order, and now we know they're not in possession of such a document,
they must leave us alone ... or pay the consequences. Yes, this process IS
powerful.
Yes, it CAN set us free from government oppression and control. By knowing the
difference between our STRAWMAN and our more real identity, and behaving
accordingly, we gain our proper sovereignty over "legal fictions" and the ability
(which is our birthright) to demonstrate freedom, to the delight of the Divine in
us all.
An example of a private administrative process response:
John Henry Doe
Secured Party
Attorney in Fact for JOHN HENRY DOE©
c/o 111 Main Street
Eugene, Oregon [97405]
February 9, 2009 Sent Certified Mail # 7004 1687 0004 3411 7422
JACK BOOT individually and dba COLLECTION MANAGER, and
CREDIT COMPANY
ADDRESS
CITY, STATE ZIP Hereinafter collectively referred to as “RESPONDENT”, “you”,
“your”
RE: Alleged Account #____ (hereinafter referred to as Loan)
Dear Mr. Boot,
This is my timely notice to you and your agents that the above alleged account
was disputed and the matter settled in full privately. In accordance with state and
federal law, this is your NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST any further contact with
me in any form, unless it is in writing, signed by a living soul, within ten days
time of the date shown above, and you have delivered to me original, verified
documents as specified below proving your claims that:
1) the Secured Party has granted you permission to trespass on a private matter;
2) the matter was something other than settled in full in a private administrative
process;
3) the bookkeeping entries show a loan was made to JOHN HENRY DOE© from
the Lender's assets thereby proving the Lender took a risk in the alleged Loan
transaction;
4) the Lender is in possession of original signatures for all transactions including,
but not limited to, the original loan agreement and transaction slips;
5) all statements by RESPONDENT and/or its agents are based on personal
knowledge as to the status of the alleged Loan;
6) the Lender and/or the RESPONDENT has a registered claim against JOHN
HENRY DOE©;
7) the Lender and RESPONDENT's have strictly adhered to, are and were
completely correct and accurate and in compliance with, the principles expressed
in the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, hereinafter referred to as “FDCPA”, in all
reporting and all information they provide/provided to Credit Reporting Agencies
regarding JOHN HENRY DOE©;
8) every contact, whether written or telephonic, to JOHN HENRY DOE© by
RESPONDENT or its Agents, is in compliance with the principles of the FDCPA;
9) an attempt to collect upon a purported debt without providing proof of claim
when demanded by the Secured Party is in compliance with the State Statutes
and constitutes a valid ‘claim’;
10) RESPONDENT’s refusal to return the bill of exchange that was tendered on
date constitutes something other than other an exchange for closure and
settlement in full of the account.
Failure to provide the above verified documentation within 10 days constitutes
your agreement that no such evidence exists and your agreement to cease and
desist from any further collection activity on said account.
Should you fail to verify each claim on a point by point basis, your silence or
failure will constitute your voluntary agreement to send, by certified mail, a
cashier's check within thirty (30) days of the date of billing by JOHN HENRY
DOE© in the following amounts:
1) One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for each communication made to JOHN
HENRY DOE©, whether telephonically or in writing, which is not in affidavit form,
regarding your unsubstantiated claim;
2) Three times the value of any property, the enjoyment and use of which by
JOHN HENRY DOE© or the Secured Party is impaired as a result of
RESPONDENT's actions without having first provided documentation verifying
your claim;
3) Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) for each transaction initiated by JOHN
HENRY DOE© where JOHN HENRY DOE©'s commercial ability is impeded due to
you or your agents’ adverse credit reporting;
4) RESPONDENT owes JOHN HENRY DOE© the amount of DOLLAR AMOUNT ($) of
your unsubstantiated claim and triple damages;
5) One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for each court appearance JOHN HENRY
DOE© or the Secured Party makes in response to RESPONDENT's unsubstantiated
claims; and
RESPONDENT also voluntarily agrees to:
6) authorize the Secured Party and JOHN HENRY DOE© to record a UCC-1 both
on RESPONDENT and insert name individually as debtors to secure the debt owed
JOHN HENRY DOE©; and
7) prove his claim as a RESPONDENT in possession of JOHN HENRY DOE©'s
property in an involuntary bankruptcy proceeding process.
The matter is finally and totally settled.
This is a private communication to you in your individual capacity and is intended
to effect an out-of-court settlement of this matter. Conduct yourself accordingly.
Sincerely, with all rights reserved,
Jeff:the man:

Don't Talk to the Police

UCC/Redemption Process

There are numerous views and theories held by supporters and deniers of the process known as “UCC/Redemption. “This study will look at some of the main subjects that are discussed about a redemption process. There are various contingents involved, as well as facts that have been disclosed by different sources concerning the information.

What is a birth certificate, is it a negotiable instrument?

Is it a promissory note?

Does it have commercial value, is it a transactional instrument? if so what was our value at birth?

The birth certificate that is kept on record at your local County and/or State, is it a contract?

Does your birth certificate give the state, and tragically in the end, the federal government control over all past, present, and future transactions which the individual named on a birth certificate enters?

What Is The UCC Redemption Process

Will the filing of an Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) Financing Statement, Addendum and/or Change Statement/Amendment include all transactions, civil matters, as well as any criminal activity?

If a person follows the steps to the “UCC/Redemption Process” , will they gain any actual value through the Federal Government? Will there have to be some value given in return?

Or is the entire “UCC Redemption Process” a deceptive maneuver, or trick, that will only bring about greater retaliation by the government agencies upon which individuals involve in the process, file with, and include in the redemption process.

The majority of lawyers view the entire UCC Process only in terms of litigation, and adjudication. The truth is, the UCC is legislated by administrative law that systematize the rules for all commercial transactions between nations, states, and even between individuals.

The Courts do acknowledge that they do not possess either the authority or jurisdiction to alter or nullify any of the articles of the UCC. The Courts will only consider those gray areas as to “Who holds the superior position”?

The party that filed the UCC first, or the one who consummated it first? The courts have addressed, and determined in specific situations, what can be thought of as a fixture. As it is relative to real property under the “Uniform Commercial Code.”

The UCC Financing Statement

Once a person files a UCC form, and it is registered by a state ’s UCC office, the filing of that document becomes a legal document; it becomes part of the public record. The person which filed the document is the secured party when it comes to the UCC filing.

This is a fact of legal procedures.

The UCC department employees of each state become the curators and are compelled to follow very specific procedures and rules. If the UCC filing complies with all the stipulations of those rules and procedures, then the document by law needs to be recorded.

There are minor diversities in the subsections of the UCC from one state to another, and even between countries. For the most part the majority of the commercial rules and procedures will be the same globally, they will be uniform. Thereby coming by the title of Uniform Commercial Code.

Every state within the United States has UCC filing offices, there are offices in every U.S. territory and protectorates of the U.S. There are even UCC filing offices established in foreign nations. It is an administrative action when an UCC form is filed, accepted, and recorded by the UCC office. It will be stamped with a file number, date, hour, and the exact minute of filing.

The UCC financing statement (UCC-1) commissions a secured party ’s status in a commercial transaction allowed by the articles of the UCC, as well as assorted sections of the United States Code that deal primarily with property.

After a secured party files a UCC form it becomes part of the public record, that a secured and vested interest is holding a superior claim over any and all other parties who have an interest, but file after the secured party, must acknowledge the preexisted position.

The secured party may make changes to the UCC financing statement (UCC-1), if they file an Amendment (UCC-3) which makes reference to the original UCC that was filed. Do not mistake the facts. The UCC deals only with secured or vested interest

However, the facts are clear. The UCC deals with secured, vested interest, and/or the possession of the property, it does not deal with the title at all. The title is a different discussion.

The Birth Certificate

The first question to discuss is the question of the Birth Certificate.

Is it an instrument of Commerce?

Is it a Promissory note?

Does your Birth Certificate have any actual commercial value?

The answer to each of these questions is NO, or at least it should be!

When a child is born, a document is prepared which is an authorization to produce a Certificate of Live Birth. The parents and/or the doctor are given an application which is ultimately a commercial contract. They will endorse as to their witnessing the creation of both the child, and a commercial document. The document created at birth is an application for a Federal Certificate of Live Birth, it is evidence that there has been a commercial contract set up. This contract establishes the freeborn child to a status of “ward of the state”.

In a few weeks, the actual Certificate of Live Birth, which was based on the application, is handed over to and filed in Washington D.C. The Certificate of Live Birth is a bonded instrument. On the reverse of the certificate is a single letter (A-N) followed by eight numbers. In recent times the same serial number of the bond is stamped on the back of a Social Security Card.

The second thing to discuss is the birth certificate itself. The original birth certificate, which is prepared in the County your birth, at the time of birth.

Is it a contract, giving the state control over everything associated with the individual named on the certificate?

NO!

The document prepared at birth is not a contract, it has no commercial value. This birth record is evidence that a live birth has transpired. This information is then disseminated throughout the various federal, state, and county district levels. It is irrefutable evidence that a living, breathing, person was born, and its existence would be registered.

Even those born on foreign soil are registered with either a certificate of naturalization, citizenship, or some other type of document which gives them authorization to remain in residence in the country. It is public agencies that specify the name on the document to be an actual person, not just a commercial entity.

How does a birth certificate have value?

It is not the birth certificate, it is the bond on a commercial entity. At the time of registration, the Corporation of the United States, through its Treasury Department creates a bond. This bond is also known by the human’s name in capital letters. A strawman is created to be used in all legal, and financial matters. More on this later.

The bond number itself can be found on the actual Certificate of Live Birth, on the back of the document. Once the county birth record is received by the federal government, the bond is created. Once both of these actions occur, the federal government releases the Certificate of Live Birth announcing the creation of a new revenue source. The value of the bond is based on the power of the state to tax the future wealth, and property, of the human being named on the document.

There have been some prints of Individual Master Files (IMF) that show the bond placed on the newborn having a value of around $650.000 dollars. There is a catch however. Any profit which is created by the investment during the life, right up to the death of the individual, of every living, breathing, male or female, remains the property of the state. All property is considered to be owned by the Corporation of the United States. This is easily seen by the seizures without Due Process which occur daily.

Federal Reserve Act in 1913

One of the most crucial years in the history of the United States, both for the government and the American citizens was the year of 1933. It was only a mere twenty years after the passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 by Congress for the Corporation of the United States that the nation was buried in debt and had a serious lack of financial resources.

The foreign bankers served Notice to this fact to the government of the United States. The Roosevelt administration reacted between January through July of 1933. This whole subject is discussed further in the hub titled {The Corporation Of The United States Of America}. Since the year 1933 every birth or naturalization record for every citizen of The United States is filed in the official records in Washington D.C. This also makes all property and any assets belonging to every living, breathing United States citizen to be used as collateral for the national debt.

There has been information that has supposedly been received from several government agencies which state that the filed Certificate of Live Birth documents have actual instructions on the reverse of the certificate stating who, and in what time frame the document should be created and delivered.The first to receive the document is the County Health Commissioner, next in line would be the Secretary of State, the final copy is received by the Department of Commerce even though the documents themselves are not kept in their offices.

The time frame for each Certificate of Live Birth to be filed in D.C. is seventeen days. There is even evidence of a Federal Children Department which was established by the passage of the Shepherd/Townsend Act of 1922 under the Department of Commerce that is somehow affiliated with this process.

There have been IMF’s that track commercial activity in the billions attached to individuals earning around fifty thousand dollars a year. The government is utilizing both their name and assets to be used to trade in the drug, crude oil and various other commodities. This just proves that all property, both real and private property of every living, breathing American, is entrusted by Congress to provide collateral for the national debt.

During the year 1933, the Congress handed over control of all the post offices to the Secretary of the Treasury. Why would they do this? That is why the revenue is delivered to the government on April Fifteenth.

If you research into the Congressional Records of 1933 you will understand how the office of the Secretary of the Treasury is actually in control of the financial office of the Corporation of the United States. This office is in control of all revenue to the United States to make sure that the creditors (Bankers) who actually own the federal reserve,will be repaid all monies owed.

Secured Party applicant has to be filed in the region or State of their Birth.

The government states that well over twenty -five million UCC Financing statements have already been filed with UCC offices throughout the United States. Related commercial documents have been forwarded to the Secretary of the Treasury.

These facts have been gathered through information acquired through the CID of the IRS, FBI, Secret Service, Justice Department, the Department of the Treasury and the Secretary of State. They have all confessed that not one single properly filed UCC Form has been turned down or prosecuted under any criminal laws.

There have been revisions to the UCC Articles especially IX that states that the UCC financing statement of the secured party applicant has to be filed in the region or State of their Birth. When the file is recorded with the Secretary of the Treasury it must include a Charge-Back Instruction Notice, a 1040 ES form combined with a birth certificate.

The Secretary of the Treasury is the other party that holds an Interest. The Secured Party also needs to file a UCC financing statement and addendum with the UCC office in the state that the person resides in order to protect any property there.

People at the Treasury Department Analysis and Control Division of the IRS where they keep the files claim that the birth certificate does not have a Commercial Value. They do however admit that the Certificates of Live Births are real and are kept on file.

Others have declared that the Application for the Birth Certificate actually does have a Commercial Value which is determined by the ability of the Government to Tax any Future Earnings of the individual named on the documents. The Applications are not kept on file in D.C. itself, some claim they are filed in Puerto Rico, others claim it is Switzerland.

National UCC Administration

There is a National UCC Administration which the states, the Protectorates and the District of Columbia had formed. The United States has been partitioned into six UCC regions. If one of the UCC offices in a particular region does not accept a properly prepared UCC another office within that region will. A person can have a regional filing recorded within a region state and have it maintain the same thing as filing within their state of birth.

A person born outside of the United States, but still is allowed to reside here and receive a social security card, can still file a UCC form in whatever state or region in which they were living when they received permission to live and remain here. It appears that the UCC as well as other paperwork that is required to be filed with the birth state or region are all logged in the mail room at 1500 Pennsylvania NW, Washington, D.C.

This is the address of the analysis and Control Division of the IRS. The documents are examined by the Secret Service, the FBI and Justice Department. The documents are known at the analysis and control division as “UCC contract trusts.”

UCC Contract Trusts and Direct Treasury Accounts

There is a significant difference between UCC contract trusts and direct treasury accounts which are used prenominaly for the trading of treasury bonds, which are managed by the Bureau of public debt. There are many UCC and bill of exchange documents that arrive at 1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW are mistakenly sent to the BPD.

The mistake that many people who file UCC forms makes is a reference to the Treasury Direct or Direct Treasury account within their paperwork. Within the Analysis and Control Division inside the IRS Building in DC, UCC contract Trusts are processed and then the documents are forwarded to one of the two IRS centers.

If you file East of the Mississippi the Documents are sent to Cincinnati, Ohio. If you file West of the Mississipi they forward them to Fresno, California. Your UCC files and documents are going to be scrutinized by the Secret Service, the Justice Department, FBI, then sent to the CID, it is also sent to the IRS Technical Support Division (TSD) within the State that the Secured Party started the discharge.

IRS Technical Support Division (TSD)

Here are some important points to know concerning the administration and purpose of the TSD!

Almost every single Financial Institution which is connected to the Federal Reserve System has registered or contracted access to an account with IRS called a Treasury Tax and Loan account (TTL).

This TTL account in every Financial Institution is managed through the TSD office which can be found within most of the IRS State Offices. Because of this IRS reconstruction the Technical Support Manager (TSM) in every State Divisional Office of the IRS has been given the same authority once held by the District Director.

When a Notice of Levy/Lien is delivered to a Financial Institution by the IRS, the Financial Institution simply responds by making an entry in their computer. This simple action transfers the asset from the person who made the Deposit int an IRS TTL account. This means that the Asset never actually physically leaves their office. There are some Financial Institutions that do not maintain a TTL account. They simply hold the funds for twenty one days before transferring the amount directly to the Internal Revenue Service.

When a Financial Institution receives a “Release of Levy/Lien” from the IRS the Financial Institution makes a simple computer entry and the funds are transferred from the TTL account into the account of the depositor if it is applicable. If a UCC form is prepared properly and filed with the Bank can be an Administrative Obstruction Action in which a Secured Party can use to show a prior and superior claim to those assets on deposit.

There are certain Banks that will not will accept UCC Documents. Do not use one of these banks but find one that will accept the form and deposit your funds there.

Correct Way to Have Claims Discharged

The way to correctly have claims discharged with the IRS as well as in the public sector using the UCC contract trust is to present by the secured party a bonded registered Bill of Exchange, and this needs to be sent straight to the Secretary of the Treasury.

When a claim is made either by the IRS, a federal or state taxing agency. The claim can then have a stamp imprinted upon it stating “Accepted For Value”. This needs to be done by the secured party and it must be sent through Certified (or Registered) mail directly to the Secretary of the Treasury to be discharged.

This is documented and authorized through public policy:

HJR-192, Title IV, Sec. 401 of the Federal Reserve Act, the Supreme Court ’s confirmation in Guaranty Trust of New York vs. Henwood, et al (1939) and Public Law 73-10. Such action is further confirmed in USC Title XII, Title XXVIII, Sec. 1641, 3002 and the Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act.

Getting back to the supposed value of the birth certificate this is the facts as I ascertained them.

The number of birth certificates that are referenced in UCC financing statements that have been stamped and filed in the state UCC filing offices is in the hundreds of thousands. Under the revised version of Article (Chapter) IX of the UCC (July 1, 2001) such filers had until June 30, 2002 to refile the UCC-1 within their state of birth.

If they reference to their original filing they could maintain the original date of filing which would then be filed with the Secretary of the Treasury. If this is not done by July 1, 2002 it would result in the loss of their original filing date and also their status as the secured party by the Secretary of the Treasury.

Department Of Treasury Admits That Millions Of UCC Financing Statements Have Been Filed

The Department of the Treasury admits that there are millions of UCC filings by secured parties which have been diverted to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS, in Washington D.C. Nobody that I am aware of has ever had criminal charges brought against them that resulted in a prosecution. There are many that do not get processed because they were not complete or filed properly.

This shows that those people who have followed the correct procedures in filing their UCC documents using the redemption process have not committed any crime. This goes for prosecution by the Department of the Treasury, the Secret Service, the Department of Justice or the IRS.

Will filing UCC Financing statements and Change/Amendments cover all commercial activity, civil cases, and also criminal actions?

Government sources claim that all commercial activity in the United States and other countries fall under the legislated (Administrative) Law which is also called the Uniform Commercial Code. Once processed through the Federal Reserve system and/or the Department of the Treasury these transactions are bonded.

Although the Court System makes claims to have Jurisdiction over Commercial Transactions that seem to break Criminal Laws. In reality the UCC Articles on their own are Administrative Law and do not fall under any Jurisdiction of the Courts or to Litigation.

The Bond Number On Your Certificate Of Live Birth Is Also Stamped On Federal Reserve Notes

When an application and Certificate of Live Birth is delivered to the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C. that certificate becomes bonded, there is an account produced which we know as the Social Security Number, this means there are funds borrowed against these accounts.

The credit approved on paper is then invested in stocks and bonds. The Bureau of Engraving states that even the Federal Reserve uses the bond number which is stamped on the Certificate of Live Birth as it is also stamped on the Federal Reserve notes themselves. The bond number has one letter from (A-N) which is followed by eight numbers. You will notice recently printed social security cards are now also printed with the bond number on the back in red ink.

It is a fact that every single living, breathing human being in the United States is bonded and used in commercial activities by the Corporation of the United States which has received them.

People who have properly and correctly filed within their birth state or UCC region will create a completely separate entity or a Secured Party completely separate from their government created debtor. (Strawman)

When the filing and the instruction order (the Chargeback) the IRS 1040 ES form, the AFV stamped birth certificate lets the Secretary of the Treasury know that the secured party has been created with a prior and superior claim to all the assets and liabilities of the debtor. (STRAW MAN)

These liabilities should be forwarded to the Secretary to be processed and discharged through the UCC Contract Trust.

There are more and more States that are now accepting the UCC Financing Statement and Addendum.

There are more and more states that are now accepting the UCC financing statement and addendum. I have not heard of one state that has sought prosecution for any filing as being illegal, civil or criminal.

There are a few states that are still trying to figure out what to do with the revised UCC Code (July 1, 2001) . There are several Counties that have no provisions for the perfecting of the UCC filing under Article 9-333(a) as a Possessory Lien. When 9-333(a) was included it was the first time an UCC had a form of lien by name included in the filing.

Is the Redemption Process an attempt to gain something for nothing from the Treasury Department?

After June of 1933 the international financiers who are the actual owners of the Federal Reserve system took ownership and control over all private and real property, this was done with the permission of Congress, and an executive order signed by the President.

By instituting your person to the status of the secured party for the government created entity listed on the Certificate of Live Birth is not the same thing as getting “something for nothing.

.” These procedures set up by the government were put in place so that the secured party could reclaim a part of what is rightfully theirs under the U.S. Constitution. Congress made provision beginning in the early 1900s for every minor to reinstate their status as an American under the U.S. Constitution when they became of age. You were a minor when the original contract (Application) was entered into by your parents. These provisions were scattered throughout various legislative acts, joint resolutions and executive orders, many in 1933, as well as in the Congressional Record based on Public Policy HJR-192, codified in Public Law 73-10 and confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in 1939. See Guarantee Trust of New York v. Henwood, et al.

By these placement actions the government has kept the details so vague and hard to reference that no person could remedy himself without persistent research. There was not until recently, very many people who even knew that these procedures existed.

The most important part of the redemption of your strawman is filing your UCC with the birth state or UCC regional office, the Secretary of the Treasury and filing in the state of residence is required to the redemption process.

The International Monetary Fund using the Secretary of the Treasury as its representative, and using the Federal Reserve and the ability of the IRS to collect revenue has virtual control over every single citizens assets. Once the secured party uses the UCC/Redemption they will create the right to reverse this control over the government created Debtor (Straw man). What the secured party accomplishes with this is to put themselves on the same level as the Secretary of the Treasury and this will lead to taking back the control over their own assets.

Does the Redemption Process entail a simple “Get Rich Quick Scheme”

A properly prepared and correctly filed UCC filing will ensure in the future to protect the property and assets of the secured party. These filings will make it clear that there is a legal and vested interest control of the secured party. You will not have to deal in Court jurisdictions and stay out of the area of controversy.

Does the redemption process entail a simple “Get Rich Quick Scheme” that will only end up with the filer coming under closer scrutiny by the government against those who participate in a UCC filing?

Under the UCC/Redemption Process the secured party does not obtain the actual application for a Certificate of Live Birth. This means that the process is only to be used for an “Accepted For Value” answer to any commercial claim.

If a written and contracted claim is received by the debtor (Strawman). it can be accepted For value by the secured party. The claim can then be discharged when the proper documents are forwarded through the Secretary of the Treasury to the UCC contract trust which remains filed with the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS.

There are many people who have tried to sidestep or manipulate this fact just to find that law enforcement as well as the courts will be more than happy to enforce and adjudicate. IRS-CID and FBI are very quickly able to use threats and intimidation to unlawfully dissuade what only the Courts of law should decide upon.

The Internal Revenue Service has increased its use of illegal threats and intimidation

The Department of the Treasury employees make it quite clear that they will not accept or perform any actions to faxed orders, telephoned or wired instructions. It must be hard-copies that are Original in both signature and any forms or documents. These documents must be delivered by certified (or registered) mail and must be filed with both the state of residence as well as the Secretary of the Treasury.

The Internal Revenue Service has increased its use of illegal threats and intimidation. They use the FBI to aid them in their attempts to admonish and stop the presentments of any Bill of Exchange documents delivered by the secured party to the secretary.

This does not mean that properly presented and prepared negotiable instruments from a legitimate Secured Party should and can be legally processed under law through local financial institutions by the person making the claim. This is done through the Secretary of the Treasury and recorded by the financial institution through the Treasury tax and loan (TTL) account.

There are some employees at the Department of the Treasury who continue to misdirect many of the documents which is presented by a secured party to the Secretary of the Treasury by mislabeling them as Treasury Securities (they are not Treasury Securities ) then they are forwarded to the Bureau of Public Debt rather then send them to the Analysis and Control Division of the IRS and the UCC Contract Trust.

“We The People” are continuing to gain knowledge and information

From what I have been able to learn is that the discharge of claims in the public sector whether federal or state claims, issued by the Internal Revenue Service are easily discharged with a simple computer entry and transfer of credit and debt through the computer using the IRS Technical Support Division.

There is verification that this process has come from the Special Procedure Handling Offices of the IRS. When a secured party utilizes the Uniform Commercial Code correctly the field is leveled as it pertains to the degree of commercial transactions.

Despite the blockage of information as well as being told false information “We The People” are continuing to gain knowledge and information regardless of being the target of threats and blackmail.

“You shall know the truth and the truth will set you free.”

‘All that is required to allow evil to flourish is that too many good men do nothing. ’

It seems that over twenty five million Americans have successfully redeemed their strawman and achieved access to their strawman trust account before 26 May 2003. It is rumored that many of these twenty five million were political insiders: (politicians, judges, lawyers, corporate executives, senior military, secret service and security services personnel and their families and others ) are implicated in the establishment and the maintaining in this fictional and fraudulent system. A system that has been used to abuse the mass population of the United States for over seventy years prior to 2003.

That averages out to over three hundred and fifty seven thousand people who found a way around this ruse every year. Surely the number of people filing UCC financing statements have risen dramatically since 2003. Since the true knowledge of this process is making its way out to the United States population the number of people filing has incrementally increased.

It seems that if twenty five million Americans knew that this was a scam for well over seventy years, yet not one broke their silence to make the rest of us aware of the charade. Then it is safe to assume that these people were part of the conspiracy about the fraud perpetrated against the American people.

The amount of people who took part in this process while remaining silent explains why this web of lies has been held in in place for so many years. Enormous numbers of people on the inside who had knowledge of the truth and received benefits from it explains the slight possibility that they might divulge some of the details about the Scam by releasing anonymous details without putting themselves in great danger if they were careful about remaining anonymous while they did so.

There is an old saying by Edmund Burke (1729 – 1797):

‘All that is required to allow evil to flourish is that too many good men do nothing. ’

I believe that most people will do nothing to redeem themselves simply because they believe they are better off being property of the state and being held responsible for a government created straw man is just fine with them.

That is the reason that this deception has endured for so long. Millions of Americans have consciously done nothing to disrupt the status quo even though they knew about the scheme and even benefited from the fraudulent system. Even though they knew the system was enslaving the American people as well as probably enslaving the rest of the world as well.

If this is done this whole charade of control and ownership will end!

It would probably be safe to assume that the same fraud is being committed against people in the UK, Canada, Australia and other nations that this system Of enslavement was established. This is to say that there were millions of people in other countries outside the United States who have also become part of the conspiracy.

There has been a long time plan by global bankers to create a New World Order. This Order would allow those in the order to own the world and everyone and every single thing in it. This conspiracy has been perpetrated by enormous numbers of lemmings and sycophants who thought that in the end they would benefit from the process. If they understood the entire plot or just there small part in it is hard to determine.

It does not seem that many average people who were not part of the conspiracy of this devious system will discover and take advantage of the redemption process The number of average people learning the processes of the redemption process will grow rapidly now that the information is making its way to them via the Internet and other sources.

Once you become aware of this situation, you should do everything in your power to fully understand the process, and pass on your knowledge to others.

If this is done this whole charade of control and ownership will end!

This will end the global financiers plot to create a New World Order that will turn the world’s people into nothing more then slaves serving their global masters.

BEWARE!

There are many Strawman/Redemption scams out there. Do not be fooled by these. Do not pay someone to teach you the process or to file for you.

Do your own research and make sure all the documentation has followed the correct procedures. Also make sure the documents are filled out and filed correctly.

You are responsible for this. This is not a simple process and you will have to educate yourself as to the correct procedures.

If you feel someone is trying to scam you or place liens on your property, my best advice would be to contact your local FBI Office.

Disclaimer

The materials available on this hub are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. All materiel are copyrighted properties of the author and may not be used without permission of the author.