Just what is a crime..?
PRIVATE REGISTERED SETOFF BOND (example)
PRIVATE
REGISTERED SETOFF BOND
|
|
||||||||
$4,500,000.00
Pay to the Order of: |
UNITED STATES TREASURY (“PAYEE”) 1500 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W. Washington, D.C. 20220 |
Issue Date: Maturity Date: |
April
6, 2010 April
5, 2040 |
For
Further Credit to: |
JOHN H DOE 123-45-6789; ABC BANK, N.A. ACCOUNT #
1000000201 |
||
By/On/Through: |
John Henry Doe, Principal (“Creditor”) Private Offset Account No. 123456789 |
KNOW
ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, which are intended to constitute a Private Registered Setoff Bond; and
WHEREAS, only fiat money exists in circulation for the discharge of debt:
NOW,
THEREFORE, the undersigned Creditor being of sound mind and honorable
intentions, for the purposes of protecting secured interests, reserving rights
of recourse, remedy and subrogation, and maintaining the honor of the
above-named Account Holders and Accounts, does by necessity hereby issue this Private Registered Setoff Bond,
tendered, in good faith, as full satisfaction of any and all claims and/or
demands, to wit: In the Creditor’s
rightful Sui Juris status, the
Creditor does hereby knowingly and with full disclosure hold, bind and obligate
Creditor’s collateral jointly and severally by this instrument as voluntary
surety for all of the above-noted Account Holders and Accounts, each severally,
for any amount up to and including: Four-million
Five-hundred Thousand United States Dollars, i.e., $4,500,000.00, insuring, underwriting, indemnifying and discharging
the said Account Holders and Accounts against any and all pre-existing, current
and future losses, costs, debts, taxes, encumbrances, deficits, deficiencies,
liens, judgments, true bills, obligations of contract or performance, defaults,
charges, and any and all other obligations as may exist or come to exist during
the term of this bond (jointly and severally “Liabilities”), thereby honorably discharging
and vacating dollar-for-dollar all such obligations until the sum or the term
of this bond is exhausted. The PAYEE
shall have ten (10) days from presentment to dishonor this bond by returning it
to the Principal by registered mail at the exact mailing location shown
below. Failure to return this bond will
stipulate acceptance and honor.
SATISFACTION
OF LIABILITIES. The PAYEE may demand
payment of all or any portion hereof at its discretion by posting the payment
to the Private Offset Account above-indicated dollar-for-dollar and
transferring the obligation by TT&L or presentment to:
Steven Terner Mnuchin (“Secretary”)
Secretary
of the Treasury
U.S.
Department of the Treasury
1500
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington,
D.C. 20220
PRIVATE
OFFSET ACCOUNT. The PAYEE shall by the end of business on the day of
presentment and in any case no later than one business day thereafter post the
full or partial value of this bond to satisfy, set-off, pay, terminate, and
discharge dollar-for-dollar in accord with generally accepted accounting
principles any and all past, present, and/or future debts, liabilities,
encumbrances, deficiencies, deficits, liens, charges, fees, interest, bills,
true bills, taxes, obligations of contract and/or performance, instruments of
debt, and all other obligations (jointly and severally “Liabilities”)
attributed to the Account Holders and Accounts above-noted.
AMOUNT
DUE: PAYEE
enter the amount due below
![]() |
MATURITY. Upon demand, the Secretary shall release the
obligation dollar-for-dollar to the extent so paid, with the balance of the
bond remaining in full force and effect.
Upon satisfaction of this obligation in full, the Secretary shall mark
this bond cancelled and return it bearing the marks of cancellation to the Principal
or the Principal’s heirs by registered mail, all profits and proceeds accruing
since presentment to remain with the Secretary for the benefit and use of the
United States Department of the Treasury.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Signatory to this
bond does hereby affix his respective hand and seal on this Second day of the Eighth
month in the year Two Thousand and Ten.
|
The Republic lasted 7 years
1782 National government went to the States and asked them to foot the bill for the Revolutionary War and the States said they would not pay the debt. National government was therefore forced to form a Constitution. The national government lost its sovereignty. A constitution (security, with sureties) is created by a constitutor – one who passes his debts to a 3rd party.
September 17, 1789 [original, up to 13 amendments (13th no titles of nobility) then ceased to exist]Constitution was a negotiable, debt, security instrument which the national debt was attached to. The King of England bought the debt (and legal title over the national government’s property) and the democracy was formed (and the Republic lost its sovereignty via international bankruptcy).
The democracy operates under military tribunal laws, where the minute you’re charged, you’re guilty.International bankruptcy lasts 70 years. At the end of the bankruptcy, the debt is due. The States had signed on as sureties for the debt.
1811 Congress decided not to renew the Bank of the U.S.
1812 War of 1812 Britain took possession of all the federal courts (where the titles are).
1816 Another central bank but Andrew Jackson nixed it. The country operated at a surplus for the only time, but did he pay the debts or was he a belligerent debtor?
1859 Civil War – the northern States went to the Southern states which had most of the money (gold,cotton, resources, wealth) and the South said no we’re not paying – we’ll start our own country. Because of their dishonor with the international bankers, and it was the will of the creditors to get the debt paid or take sureties for the debt; hence the States lost their sovereignty – they had signed the first Constitution that secured the debt.
1999 State now not only has legal title to everything, but controls equitable title to almost everything,electronically.. We went from fascism to communism.
We’re under admiralty or maritime law because it has grace and mercy. Common law is execution on thelaw, but the current common law is admiralty. We’re all vessels. They give us a berth in admiralty (app.for b/c). The b/c is your foreign situs trust; it’s what gives you the ability to operate with all the other vessels. Then the Federal Corporation (estab. 1859) comes along and gives its members (citizens) benefits & privileges (social insurance contract or Soc. Sec.) – another trust,c’est eque or implied trust. You’re a debtor who doesn’t have to pay (there is no gold in use to pay anyway; you get to operate in commerce; you get to go to jail, etc.
The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)
In 1992, George H.W. Bush signed Executive Order 12803, which gave D.C. the authority to sell America's infrastructure. They called this authority "Infrastructure Privatization." E.O. 12803 tells us this power cleared the way for the "disposition or transfer of an infrastructure "asset" such as by sale or by long-term lease from a State or local government to a private party."
E.O. 12803 also lists examples of America's saleable and/or lease-able infrastructure:
· Roads
· Tunnels
· Bridges
· Electricity supply facilities
· Mass transit
· Rail transportation
· Airports
· Ports
· Waterways
· Recycling/wastewater treatment facilities
· Solid waste disposal facilities
· Hospitals
· Prisons
· Schools
· Housing
E.O. 12803 tells us that this list represents infrastructure "examples." Let us, therefore, assume that this is not the complete list of America's saleable infrastructure. However, this list is a stunning confession.
Notice that all items listed in 12803 are the very same infrastructure items listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders (see here). Martial Law kicks in to power during declared states of emergency and with the single signature of the president. Strangely (and ignorantly), we currently have multiple declared states of emergency:
· Act of March 9, 1933, a declared state of emergency at the request of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This state of emergency was never lifted.
· Global pandemic - Level 6
· Mortgage/housing crisis
· Banking/lending crisis
· Automobile industry crisis
· Insurance industry crisis
· Healthcare crisis
· Southwestern border crisis
· Black market drug crisis
· National education crisis
· Nature/global warming crisis
· Jobs/unemployment crisis
· On-going weather and forest fire crises
· Extreme and unread congressional legislation crisis due to on-going crises
What are the odds of complete and total social and "natural" crisis in every single facet of our lives and all at the same time? I will tell you how it was accomplished with simple math:
Federal Reserve System + Politicians + Tell-A-Vision = Assembly Line Crises. It is called the Hegelian Dialectic Show.
Everything in the country, including the current planet-sized medical emergency, is in crisis. So enters Martial Law.
Think of our president's promises to "change" the country and to fix the economy (which the Federal Reserve and Congress destroyed) by rebuilding America's infrastructure, including "21st Century schools" and by greening-up our living standards and conditions (International Code Council, Carbon Credits, Waxman-Markey Climate Bill, etc.) - minus, of course, privately owned land and homes (Agenda 21). In the last six months, consider the massive growth of the Federal Government, the national debt, and the powers of the Federal Reserve Central Banking System - all with stated intentions of fixing the economy that they single-handedly destroyed - and fixing it with "infrastructure" projects.
As Martial Law militarily guards all of E.O. 12803's infrastructure as listed in the Order, and with homeland paramilitary armies holding practice drills with foreign armies, local law enforcement, and emergency responders all across the nation (and with a big drill planned July 27th through July 31st in FEMA Region 6),
And with all public schools, private schools, and universities forced to have "lock-down policies" and to be forced-used as quarantine holding tanks, and with all Americans having been repeatedly told to prepare for an emergency (meaning an emergency that will bring Martial Law into the full light of day, which the "drills" have clearly done),
AND the very same infrastructures listed in Executive Order 12803 are also listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders, and all these infrastructures having been for sale, lease-able, or having been sold during the last 17 years- including our children's schools, our hospitals, and our homes - I suggest to you that you are witnessing Central Banking Debt Magic at its finest moment. Wouldn't you love to know how much money has been made by selling our nation to the highest bidders?
Let us review:
1. The country's infrastructure has been for sale for 17 years. Roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling/wastewater facilities, solid waste facilities, prisons, hospitals, schools, and housing -- this being of "examples" of saleable infrastructure and not the entire list of saleable items according to E.O. 12803--so the question begs: What exactly has been sold to "private parties in our nation? We would like to see the complete list. We know that many highway systems have been sold to foreign countries, but what of the other listed items? Have they been sold as well?
If so, who owns them, and more to the question, which D.C. department sold them and for how much? Did the Federal Reserve and Congress sell our nation? Where is the paperwork? Did they repay any of America's debt that they purposefully created with their pyramid fiat money lending schemes? And why are they still raising our taxes if America is no longer America but belongs to foreign nations or "private parties?" Since the Federal Reserve is a "private" corporation, did the Fed buy any of America's infrastructure "assets?"
As American "housing" is on 12803's list, and since D.C. recently took over the mortgage industry, has the housing market been sold and/or leased to a "private party" like a foreign nation or the Federal Reserve Corporation? Are the American people tenants to unknown parties? Are American children occupying foreign-owned schools, and are our loved ones lying in foreign hospitals that are clearly chock-full of foreign doctors? Equally, who, exactly, is financing the building of 21st Century schools and classrooms complete with foreign curricula? The questions beg: who are the foreigners....the foreigners or the American people?
More to the point, who is dissolving, partitioning, and/or divvying up our nation? Is it Obama? Geithner? Bernacke? Bushes? Clintons? FDR? Wilson? American morons?
It would seem that we are preparing for the Big Transfer - the transfer of our nation to and beneath a new authority or several new authorities. It now makes a great deal of sense why foreign troops have been cross-training with our new paramilitary systems, and yes, there are foreign troops on American soil, which I fear may not be American soil at all. Equally, multiculturalism suddenly makes a great deal of sense. I believe we can call it "behavior modification" so that we the stupid people will behave and be obedient under the new rules of new and foreign leaders.
I ask you, has our nation been sold out from under us, and without our knowledge? Could there be any other possible explanation for selling the most critical components of our country, while at the same time creating new, multicultural and cross-trained armies; permanently bankrupting the nation and selling its debt to foreign countries, and having Martial Law orders written specifically to protect the sold "assets" of our nation--including our schools and homes? Are America's new owners to be protected by new Martial Law armies, cross-trained with foreign armies, while our "traditional" military is spread all over the planet - except here with its nation's people? Are we being transferred to new ownership as we speak?
Consider:
Washington D.C. debts were sold to foreign nations.
· Washington D.C. = politicians
· Debts = Federal Reserve Central (Fiat) Banking
· Sold = Wall Street
Is it not realistic to think that big league politicians, bankers, and CEOs are loyal to no nation when they were massively enriched by internationalized banking, internationalized trade, absurd and illegal taxation, and by interest rates forced upon the people of this nation, while at the same time selling our nation to other central banks around the world and "private parties" - and for personal profit? Truth is, they sold the infrastructure first, and then they sold we the people as tax generators and life-long human resources to their global banking and business partners in crime.
What is the crime, you ask? The Federal Reserve, which is a piece of a global banking cartel, and their politicians and CEO partners who made counterfeiting and Ponzi/pyramid schemes legalized theft on continental scales. Your country is 1) not your country and, 2) not what you thought it was for at least 100 years. You are going to have to seek God's grace to be relieved from the bitterness of that truth. Today, we don't know under whose authority we live, but Washington, D.C. and the Federal Reserve do know.
Big, big changes are on the horizon. All I can tell you is to remember that freedom, granted to all by God, is first and foremost a state of mind. Pray for guidance. Prepare yourselves because Obama spoke the truth. It is all about "infrastructure." The promised change has arrived. The question is this: who owns America? Who have the American people been committed to serving and beneath what form of government?
We can pretty much assume that Asia owns a very large chunk of America, as does Great Britain, India, Middle Eastern countries, and perhaps Mexico and Canada, as well. We can also assume that Martial Law armies will be guarding all the sold "assets" during what could be an extraordinary and massively tyrannical transfer of power. The love of money is the root of all evil. No truer words were ever spoken.
3 URGENT QUESTIONS
1. Will you allow a vial of fluid to be injected into your bloodstream containing experimental "synthetic" (artificial) RNA antibodies without understanding the ingredients and possible side-effects?
2. Do you blindly trust Pfizer, CNN, Bill Gates, Fauci and the biased media monopolies when they tell you the experimental vaccine is safe?
3. What do you know about RNA? About your natural antibodies? About what could happen when 'unnatural synthetic antibodies' are injected into your body? Did you know these artificial antibodies are PERMANENT? They can NEVER be removed.
pfizer
Pfizer claims their COVID vaccine is “90% effective”. Since there is no accurate test for COVID, the question is: "Effective for what?"
Do you trust criminal organizations? That’s what Pfizer is. In fact, they may be the largest criminal organization in the world.
Have a look here.
vaccineimpact.com/2020/criminal-pfizer-inc-wins-covid-vaccine-race-hundreds-of-millions-of-doses-expected-to-be-ready-within-weeks/
BILL GATES ON VIDEO ADMITTING VACCINES WILL CHANGE YOUR DNA
Watch this SHOCKING video admission at 1:45 by immunologist and geneticist Sir John Bell who states,"These vaccines are unlikely to 'completely sterilize' a population.
STERILIZE???? Are you paying attention???
Dr. Christiane Northrop is a leading medical authority in the field of women's health and wellness and a New York Times best selling author.
SHE HAS PUT HER CAREER AND REPUTATION ON THE LINE TO DELIVER THIS FACTUAL VIDEO
fraud
off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud
Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried. If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us try to repair the damage they have already inflicted.
Here is a detailed "Covid-19 evidence-of-fraud" REPORT.
<---
IF YOU ARE TAKEN TO JAIL
'fresh arrest,' try to get the names of the officers involved in your arrest who cause the most
injury, threats or pain. Try to keep the details of your 'fresh arrest' in your head, as most likely,
they won't give you paper & pencil. DO NOT SIGN IN, DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS,
GIVE FINGERPRINTS, ETC., ONLY AFfER THEIR THREATS, AND DO NOT SIGN
WHEN YOU' RE GETTING OUT. As soon as you are out, you need to do up an affidavit of all
the facts of that unlawful arrest! It is best if you have someone that has your power of attorney to
assist you in these matters until you are out.
But, when you find yourself in a jail cell ... for whatever reason you' ve heard the story, seen it in
the movies... that you have a right to ONE phone call. So the question is "who do you call?"
Well, it's not to call your lawyer (God forbid!), your girlfriend, your pastor, the bondsman, your
buddy or your bookie! THE ONLY REASON FOR THE ONE PHONE CALL IS TO CALL
N THE JUDGE!
Seek the name of the judge and try to get the phone number from the jailers. Be business like and
polite, but firm! It is part of your 'Due Process', as they say ... you have the right to one phone
call! Merely state that you need the number so that you can request an appearance bond
without fees or cost. This must be requested preferably before your arraignment.
Note; The Appearance Bond is the Bond that the Prosecutor puts up to bond the action brought
forward by the traffic officer/cop or he himself. They created the 'action,' they have to bond the
action in the event that they injure you in their misapplication of statutes or other injuries that
may occur!
If you are denied the phone call, then make the request at the next available opportunity, either
with any 'agent' to comes to you and or when you are taken into court for arraignment.
Remember, you want the 'Appearance Bond' as part of your due process, and if the judge
produces the bond, you can state that you "accept the bond for value, I do not intend to challenge
the facts of the case" (or it can be stated;) "I plead guilty to charges in behalf of the
defendant/debtor, but that's not me ... and I request the court to discharge the charges via the
Bond and I request that the Bond be released to me."
If the judge denies the 'bond,' he then has denied you remedy (due process), committed
commercial fraud, (as the charges are not laid on you, but on the corporate fiction
Defendant/debtor), and since you cannot pay the fine or pay off the commercial charge, and can
only be 'discharged,' and being the 'insurance policy' via the bond is created by the prosecutor
or some other agent via the 'case,' is to be brought forward to indemnify the
man/creditor/sovereign, in light of the bankruptcy, as everything is insured! But the system most
always get's the 'arrestee' (you) to bond the case yourself or get you to plead guilty ... and or
consent to the charges!
If the bond is denied, at your next available opportunity, and or with someone you have given
power of attorney to if you are still incarcerated, you can exercise your exclusive remedy ... and
that is a Tort Claim!
A FEW CASE CITES
LISTED HERE FOR REFERENCE ONLY!
When an individual is detained, without warrant and without having
committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a
false arrest and unlawful imprisonment:
DAMAGES AWARDED
TREZEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA,741 F2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984) Motorist
illegally held for 23 minutes on a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in
damages. (Sets foundation for $75,OOO/hr., l,600,OOO/day)
CIVIL RIGHTS
SANDERS v. ENGLISH, 950 F2d 1036 (6th Cir. 1992) False arrest, illegal
detention (false imprisonment), and malicious prosecution are recognized
as causes of action under Title 42 Section 1983. ( •.• and TORT!)
PRECEDENT
JAMES v. KENTUCKY, 466 US 341, 80 LED 2d 346, 104 S Ct. 1830 (1984)
The supreme court held that State statutes did not take precedent over
Constitutional law.
MOYA v. US, 761 F2d 322 (7th Cir. 1985) People are entitled to refuse to
provide information to police. Moya went to the supreme court and back.
(held to be valid)
Padelford, Fay a. Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah,
14 Ga. 438 (1854) "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain,
by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The
Constitution, it is true, is a compact [contract], but he is not a party to it.
The States are a party to it .•• "
emphasis added.
Apostille Procedure What has come to be known as the Apostille is slightly misleading because the Apostille is only the last step of an involved process. The Hague Convention has provided procedures, agreed to by its signatories, for the legalization of documents. For example, if you want to go to France to teach for a year and you want your diploma recognized, you might get an Apostille on it before you go. If you have different licenses and you want them to be recognized as genuine in another country, again, you get an Apostille. What some very bright individual figured out is that the process of legalization is a process of legitimization. The Hague convention recognizes statutory courts, constitutional courts, and even ecclesiastical courts. So what kind of court is a “common law” court? This procedure is formally called “expatriation.” Others prefer to describe it as rebutting a presumption. But in any case, one takes it upon himself to make known that he is a sovereign. This person has discovered an entity, an all capital letter name, a trust with a number, that is being confused with him. The person also has learned of certain allegations of fraud and deceit surrounding this entity vis-à-vis the agency that purportedly created it. So the sovereign offers to give it back to the creator(s) for destruction. This is done by a commercial affidavit called the Cancellatura of Foreign Instruments. It is an involved document that is mailed to the State Secretary of State, as well as the Secretaries of State and Treasury in Washington D.C. These agents are given time to answer the affidavit and send an officer to come and collect all the instruments of collateral held by the sovereign making the offer. This means he is offering back the social security card, driver’s license, credit cards, union cards, commercial and occupational permits and licenses. If you actually get a response from an offer like this, let us know… no one has come calling to collect yet. What many do receive in the mail, after about three months, is a strange letter from the IRS. It addresses the person in their sovereign capacity, acknowledges the affidavit, and says “We don’t think it is in our best interest to argue this.” Such a letter is record of default. The parties are given ten days to respond, during which time the person goes to the common law court and secures a “witnessing” of his stated intent to reaffirm that character and status he has always had since birth… SOVEREIGNTY. The jury signs his paperwork and it is notarized. Then the person takes the papers to a notary public and gets an Actual Notice of Apostille signed and notarized for presentation to the Secretary of State. It is affixed on the top of the documents prepared by the common law court. The
Secretary, by treaty, has to attach the Apostille to the documents upon request. Once completed, the highest constitutional office in the state has just made legitimate your claim of who and what you truly are. What you do with it from there is your business. Be creative, be wise, but most of all have fun.
“Three Questions,” approach to functioning in court:
2. A court is a “place where a contract or agreement is made.” A court is a "commercial register.” One consequence of this is that all courts are “courts of record.” Indeed, there is nothing with which a judge can deal except the record. How can a judge act in the absence of paperwork in his possession that inform him what a case is?
3. In accordance with the principle of agreements, if someone fails to respond in protest you in essence have an agreement that includes his stipulation that he is in dishonor.
4. When you are formulating an agreement, the first thing you need is the name of the second party. This is why in court you first ask the judge if you may have his name. Note: the Court is working on an assumption of contract, not an agreement in fact.
Procedure/Dialogue
The Redemption dialogue makes the court proceeding into a deposition that you are conducting for the purpose of establishing on the record who the claimant is in the case. You are there under threat, duress, and coercion, since guaranteed harmful repercussions are inevitable if you do not appear when/as commanded. You are also there because someone, somewhere, has made a claim—or color of claim (implying, or calling what they allege without foundation a “claim”—against you that allegedly justifies enforcing the claim against you by using the legal-violence system. By engaging in this deposition you are actualizing the maxim of law that “the burden of proof resides on him who asserts, not him who denies.” You want them to prove the nature and cause of their alleged or implied claim. In other words, you—as the creditor, owner of the court and both sides of the transaction—are requiring them to “put up or shut up.” When you go into court like this you are exercising your rights under public international law to determine what kind of business these people are trying to do with you.
In any interchange between you and the judge, whether it is you requesting that the judge answer something you are asking him, or him asking you a question, you must persist until the judge sees that you are not going to give in. This is perhaps especially important if/when a judge asks you to state your name, or asks if you are so-and-so. He may ask at least three (3) times, since the system functions in threes. The judge needs to know that you are clear and secure about what you are doing and will not cave in under the psychological pressure that he is so well-trained in applying on those who are before him in court. Likewise, you may have to state your requests three (3) times until you receive either an answer, or a non-answer (which stands as an admission on the record of your position in the matter).
1. The first thing you do is ask the judge for his name so the record is set concerning the parties entering into an agreement. Therefore, when your name is called, you say, "I am here concerning that matter. May I have your name please?” Request number 1.
2. Pay attention to the fact that most Judges/Justices prefer to give their title, NOT THEIR NAME.
3. If the judge gives his name, request: “Would you please spell that for me.”
4. If the judge gives his title (such as “Judge Smith”), request: “Your offer of communication is accepted for value and your dishonor is returned. Please state your name, NOT YOUR TITLE.”
5. If the judges states that it is a TITLE/NAME, you can ask: “Is that TITLE/NAME (such as JUDGE SMITH) the same TITLE/NAME that is registered with the Secretary of State?” If not, it is fraud and the entire matter is void because the judge is doing business as a name (and therefore as a different entity) than that by which is registered as authorized to do business (another derivative).
6. Now if the judge won't give his name, then go ahead with your second request anyway. If someone with whom you are dealing in court fails to respond or is standing mute it means you are in control and he is waving his rights. Request number 2: "Do you have a claim against me?" He will either stand mute or he will decline to answer, signifying his intent to demur to the matter.
7. When you receive a “no” answer, or no response, or a non-responsive response, go on to Request number 3. "Do you know anyone who does have a claim against me?" Note that you do not say any "person" or "anybody that" has a claim. It is anyone "who" has a claim against me, i.e., a living principal who is alive and breathing in the real world. You are not pleading into a fiction or a legislative venue, which is the major legislative premise (presumption) on which the court functions. This presumption stands unless neutralized.
8. If the prosecutor answers you by saying something like “The State of California has a claim against you,” you can say either “Your honor, would you please direct the prosecutor to produce the assessment for the charges,” or, “I call the claimant to the witness stand,” or, “I call the State of California to the witness stand.”
9. Now if you receive a "No" answer or non-responsive reply to your request for the judge to inform you whether he knows anyone who has a claim against you, and the prosecutor also says “no,” then continue by directing the Judge, 1st position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to answer whether there are any more charges.” Asking the judge this cuts down on any more assumed charges. On a good day the prosecutor will refuse to answer and the Judge will dismiss the case on the spot!!!!
10. At this point you can direct the Judge, 2nd position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to answer whether the assessment for the charges is in his/her possession.” Making this request of the judge forecloses the system from acting on the otherwise un-neutralized assumption that you are not concerned whether there is a civil assessment to justify the charges. Without an assessment there can be no charges (see §§ 18 & 19, below). Asking this questions puts the prosecutor in trouble, as if he does not immediately drop the charges he is practicing law without a license, which is a felony!
11. At this point you can direct the Judge, 3rd position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME direct the prosecutor to provide the assessment for the charges along with the certified audit trail of all transactions (held by the mayor of the municipality and the applicable risk management department) including the voucher and all disbursement documents and receipts.”
12. At this point you direct the Judge, 4th position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to provide the serial placement number of his/her bar card.” NOTE: many times the prosecutor is not qualified even to be there (which is often the situation in federal court), and the bar card, which is an OMB number, can be used as the number for a surety bond.
13. At this point you direct the Judge: 5TH position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please state for the record if you have subject matter jurisdiction.” NOTE – if there are no further charges, no assessment for the current charges, and no subject matter jurisdiction, the court is in a forfeit position.
14. If you elect to utilize the appearance bond matter within this Redemption approach, this would be the place to bring the matter up [as of this writing requesting an appearance bond may be eclipsed by the single-page Court Bond on court-pleading paper]. Then your 6th position consists of your request for the appearance bond. Making this request in effect puts your name on the account and thereby charges the account so that when the appearance bond is discharged (by appearance) the operators of the account are put into immediate INVOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY. If there is no assessment for the charges, more than likely they will not issue an appearance bond and you can therefore issue a subrogation surety bond.
15. Should anyone hand you any piece of paper, in particular a paper in which they want you to read the assumed “charges,” scan the front and back of each page and say, “I cannot see any charges.” Hand the paperwork back to the one who gave it to you and then direct/request the Judge to have the prosecutor read the charges.
16. DO NOT LET THEM WAIVE THE READING OF THE CHARGES. Once more repeat the request for the assessment for the charges. Persist on this point. Once that point is resolved, state that you are not disputing any of the facts in the matter and admit to the facts in the charging document. The point is that the system wants you to accept the face appearance of their documents and statements as gospel, so that you self-assess and testify as a witness against yourself. Do not waive the right to require them to provide you with the civil assessment. They never have any valid criminal charges, nor any assessment to support the civil charges (all actions today, both civil and criminal, are actually civil, i.e., commercial). Do not let them off the hook and hang yourself. Require that they substantiate the charges.
17. USE YOUR INTUITION AND WHETHER TO USE next phrase after the gavel fallen (the discharge)! "I request that the order of the court be released to me immediately."
18. This is not a question, it is a request. You do not move the court because doing so is asking for a benefit. By making the request, you are in essence saying, "If there is no firsthand witness or claimant present, on what are you operating? Give me your marching orders." You are demanding to see the order of the court.
19. When you say/ask/request these three things you create a small claims court. A small claims court has different rules and procedures than a commercial admiralty/equity court. In a small claims court there are no Titles of Nobility; attorneys cannot be present.
20. The parties themselves state the claims in small claims court, so we will know who has a claim and who does not.
21. If there are no claims then there is a default to investigate.
22. This Three Questions process also constitutes an inquest hearing on a 'show cause.' You are doing a coroner's inquest or a probate into the matter of any claims against you. In this inquest, only those who have firsthand information concerning the claims may testify.
23. If you are conducting a public inquest into the matter concerning any claims that may be brought against you, and no claims are brought, the matter is concluded, the public inquest is over and you are out of there.
24. Now, there are some variations that can happen with this. The judge or the prosecutor might say, "The State/Province/Department of ______ has a claim against you.” No, they do not. They may have charges (i.e., what they call “charges” but which are actually only a presumption of charges, i.e., color of charges, since there is no assessment), but not a claim. Charges are not claims.
25. Some judges get cute, saying things like, "My name is judge so and so." Well, that's a fiction. That designation does not pertain to a real party, and is not a name that can be entered in the "commercial register." "Judge So and So" is an unregistered fiction, i.e., doing business under an unauthorized and unregistered name.
26. At that stage of the game, you should alter your questions somewhat. 27. "Is there anyone present to press the claim against me in any alleged name other than his own?"
28. If the prosecutor wants to stand up and press that claim (of which there is miniscule chance), then you demand that he be sworn in to testify under oath as to the damages creating and validating the claim concerning which he is testifying. Now you have your inquest.
29. He is not going to swear in24, so you say, "There being no claimants who have sworn in under penalty of perjury today with a firsthand damage claim, it would appear as though there is no more public business concerning me. I am withdrawing." There is no credible witness, and therefore no admissible evidence. No one will swear with responsibility and firsthand knowledge that there is a claim because it does not exist. Even if they have evidence, it is rendered hearsay and presumption for want of any credible witness to substantiate the validity of the evidence. Prosecutors are attorneys, and no attorney is a credible witness who can testify under oath on the witness stand that the evidence he places on the record is valid.
24 Attorney’s statements are arguments, not evidence. That is a double fault, since such behavior is both dishonor and presumption. To be evidence, whatever documents are filed would have to be substantiated as valid and verifiable by testimony under oath. No attorney can do this, i.e., take the witness stand and swear in, because he is not speaking for/as himself, with firsthand knowledge and defined commercial responsibility. He represents, i.e., “re-presents,” by derivative re-invention, what he has been told (hearsay) or thinks would be expedient to say (fiction).
30. Don't allow the Judge to hoodwink you into allegiance.
31. Do not follow the orders of the judge or the judge becomes the head and you become the tail.
32. It is either the judge's private business that's going to go on in there, which is the business of the corporate state, or your private rights under public law.
33. If you traverse into his business you abandon your claim. Don’t traverse, make requests instead. Avoid even the appearance of dishonor. Politely requesting, rather than engaging in behavior that might be interpreted as confrontational, can work wonders.
34. What is an "order"? Public people are acting under the premise of legislative jurisdiction. They MUST have delegation orders that give them authority to do what they are doing. Once you have gone through the first 3 questions: The name, the claim, know anyone who has a claim, if there is no response, then nobody has come forward with a claim against the one asking the questions, i.e., you. In such case there is no cause of action and your adversary has “failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
35. Where would an order of the court come from? The order would have to come from the Secretary of the Treasury, because he is liable for all the books and is the one that appraised the security instrument. So, if they don't have an order going back to the Secretary of the Treasury, they don't have any authority to collect the debt. Remember the universal operating premise on which the legal system functions: Unrebutted presumptions rule.
36. When they issue a citation, complaint, information, or indictment, somebody has already established a commercial value on that instrument. Although there might be a set of papers in the administrative process, like the court documents, we know (and reason, logic, and common sense tell us) that there is a set of commercial (banking) documents and accounts paralleling the legal. Commerce is more fundamental than law. Commerce can function without the legal system, but not vice versa. Law is a subset and derivative of commerce. There is an equivalent commercial world and universe in bookkeeping that parallels and underlies the legal judicial bookkeeping.
37. If an indictment is issued, such as on tax evasion, there must be an appraisal that says that the appraised value of this indictment is $100,000.00.
38. So, in the Treasury, whenever an indictment goes out it claims an asset by way of the security instrument in the sum certain amount of $100,000.00. Then there is a corresponding side to the ledger sheet which is an accounts receivable of $100,000.00 to back up the asset. Is this not DOUBLE ENTRY BOOKKEEPING?
39. If you don't address the commercial aspects of the citation, complaint, information, or indictment, then they have an asset on their books that remains. If it is not adjudicated they have an accounts receivable that is aging.
40. If you dishonor the asset—the indictment—then, their books are out of whack because a dispute exists as to the asset, and the accounts receivable of $100,000.00 that they are looking for remains uncollected.
41. If the prosecutors have no order from the Secretary of the Treasury to collect the alleged debt against the Defendant in the case, they are acting as rogue agents. Obviously the order is an item that one could subpoena the prosecutors to produce by subpoena duces tecum.
42. Remember, you (i.e., your strawman) are there in your "public capacity." Under public international law, private rights are recognized, authorizing you, as the living principal appearing as authorized representative and attorney in fact for your client (your strawman). The real you can be damaged by the proceedings, and, in addition, you have a pre-existing claim against the debtor, the alleged Defendant (your strawman), such as is noticed by your UCC Financing Statements. But as soon as you engage in a co-business venture in their private business (by traversing, dishonoring, or not accepting for value, posting bond, and discharging the charges), you are in their court in a business contract.
43. By requesting that the order of the court be released to you immediately, you are demanding that if you are there on public business involving you, then you want to know who is behind the claim. That request constitutes a public verbal demand for a Bill of Particulars! This removes any assumptions/presumptions around the agreement in question. You are trying to determine the nature and cause of the claim—what it is and who made it.
44. If you receive no response from anyone you are entitled to make the following statement, "It would appear as though I have completed my public business here today. There being no further public business to carry on, I'm withdrawing." Now you're giving your equitable notice to the parties present. You turn and walk out. If anyone tries to stop you, start the Three Question process all over again with him.
45. You don’t care what the judge says, you just go on, and you just go through the routine and direct it at him. Usually they will give their name to start with. Anybody who addresses anything in there is doing so in your court if you have not traversed, not dishonored, and have posted a bond. By bonding the action through your exemption you discharge the charges and end the controversy on the private side, thereby owning the transaction and the court. They are now your employees and, without any reality on the private side to reflect, the public side is left in an untenable position. If, however, you start acknowledging any of their procedures in there, then they are going to assume you are in their court and not yours. They want you to recognize, i.e., make the legal determination concerning the identity of, the accuser, either by body language, testimony, or otherwise so you become a witness against yourself. If you accuse yourself, no one else is required to do so.
Further considerations on all of this are set forth as follows:
1. “Circuit courts” are geared to track the circuitry of the human body or the human mind, which determines, structures, and operates the circuitry through which the current (currency) flows.
2. A direct examination is examining the "conscious mind"; a cross-examination examines the "subconscious mind."
3. Your subconscious mind is totally innocent of everything. It believes everything your conscious mind tells it. That is why people have to stay in "good standing" with their own consciences. What they are trying to get you to do is to alter the agreement between your "conscious" mind and your “subconscious" mind. When that happens, your immune system breaks down. You must be totally honest to keep your immune system together.
4. When we press them for this kind of testimony concerning their affairs they back away. We continue to the point that they must compromise their conscience when we bring the fact of the matter to them.
5. The “law” knows only two types of persons; “employees” and “employers” as identified by the “Tax Identification Number (S.I.N./S.S.N.).
6. The “employer” is the Preferred Stockholder, while the “employee” is the Common Stockholder, of the “Corporate Government” (bankrupt US Inc.).
7. The Preferred Stockholder has this position via the “Birth Certificate.”
8. The Preferred Stockholder holds both the “debit” and the “credit” side of the account.
9. A "traffic ticket," for instance, represents "common stock."
10. What the Judge is doing here is attempting to get you to agree with the operational assumptions, such as agreeing to be the collateral on whatever the charge is, i.e. Ticket, Non-Filing, etc., thereby stipulating that the charge is valid.
11. When you tender currency, which is the "public exchange," you do not pay any debt. You cannot reduce a negative (public charge) with another negative (public money).
12. If you are faced with a fine involving a serious criminal charge, and you pay with "public money," it is a bribe.
13. When you request that the court release the order to you, what you are asking them to give you the "common stock." Release the stock ("order of the court") to me immediately.
14. The "order" represents the One World Order, for one thing. It is also a "money order," or possibly a "work order."
15. Whoever has presented the “charge(s)” is the one with the “claim”; the one with the claim is the payee.
16. When you accept the account for value, they must bring the amount into existence from your private account, at which point they have a "tax obligation" on their hands.
17. When you accept the property for value, they are the payees because they are in possession. We're saying, "I accept that claim," because they are holding a "lien" on the "claim," and they have it in their possession, so they are the payees in fact. The payee in fact has to answer to the Internal Revenue for the funds.
18. Accepting a charging instrument for value means that you accept the claim. I accept the claim, and I am the taxpayer in fact, because I allow them to pass through "my account" to discharge the charges.
19. They have to release the order of the court to you. They have to release the "claim," i.e., the money, the account. The account, however, is already prepaid, because you are the principle. They obtained the money from you in the first place, since where that is where all the currency in circulation today derives from. You already paid the claim, and you are asking them to release the claim that you have already paid.
20. So what you do is interrogate the witness. You ask the three magic questions and don’t go beyond that.
21. When you are interrogating a judge you don’t care what he says because anything he says can and will be used against him. He is testifying, not you! That is the essence of taking testimony because when you enter it into their courts the situation inverts. The Miranda warning says “anything you say can and will be used against you.” It does not say “might.”
The jurisdiction of courts today is international. All commerce occurs in international admiralty/maritime. That means that you and I, as the owners of the account, do not do any of the work. We are the sovereigns, so our employees (public officials) do the work. When there is a credit and a debit, we have two employees involved: one state and one federal. These employees handle the matching funds.