Welcome to the light! Secured Party Creditor Process Pack + Templates $64.95 Bitcoin BTC Use the Bitcoin address below to donate with Bitcoin:

All NEW

Massive Amount of New Cutting-Edge Technology

2024 MASTER'S DEGREE

 

NEW INFO:SECURED PARTY CREDITOR PROCESS..

All your UCC1 forms ready to fill out, with examples, and where to send them. and much much more!

Acquire Abandoned Houses Legally:  (e-book now included)

First, you find an Abandoned House. Then, clean the lawn and fix up the broken 

windows. Next, you send a bill to the last known owner of record.  Now, you file a 

Claim of Lien in the County Recorders office to secure the property.  

Finally, you foreclose on your lien, and subsequently receive the default 

judgment on your claim, because no one is there to Challenge your Claim. The 

clerk of the Court issues the writ of possession and execution. You pay the 

Sheriff $100 and he executes the writ.   Congratulations you just acquired a 

house!

Thanks for stopping by my blog ,I've spent the past 10 years going to expensive seminars and compiling some of the most sought after books and material (some info I cannot disclose here, but be assured this is the most up to date technology out there)on the Internet and I thought I could help people who are interested in this information get it all in one shot, If your interested in the accepted for value process, this is the step by step guide that walks you through the entire process. You need to start setting off your debt, this is a proven process that has been evolving over the last 30 years. This information is cutting edge and proven. You must get this information and share it with everyone you know. Below you will see a list of all the books you will receive and also a massive amount of bonus information that I cant disclose here. If you are in foreclosure now or it looks like your heading in that direction, or your struggling with your finances due to the current financial climate all of this info will help you to keep your home but more importantly understand how the system works.

All of this info will be sent to you in pdf format.Here is a list of just some of the books you will receive,plus a massive amount of insider secrets I cant name here.




1.ACCEPT IT FOR VALUE RETURN IT FOR VALUE,Private document, For entertainment purposes only, this is not legal advice. This is strictly a administrative/contract remedy, We are not tendering payment. There is no money to pay anything… The contracts are already in place in the background. We are simply accepting the credits they have established and authorizing them to set-off the debt with the said credits.Written in proper Bank-speak, it is possible to “set-off” unsecured debt items to the IRS and authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to issue Money Orders to pay off those debts using your public side Strawman Social Security Number. On the back side of that SSN, there is an alphanumeric account number in your Strawman name that is your private account that can be drawn from. By doing so, you help reduce the National Debt!

Accessing and utilizing your credit lawfully, safely, and wisely requires considerable education in just who you are in relation to the CORPORATION and your strawman. This process takes time. It requires you relearn your role in society. It requires courage and conviction to go against everything you have been told all your life. It requires responsible teachers and well-developed technology.

Ill show you my process and how it works for me.

2.How To STOP The FORECLOSURE On YOUR PROPERTY

A simple guide to save your house.
DEFENDING NONJUDICIAL DEED OF TRUST FORECLOSURES
PROCEDURE FOR RESTRAINING TRUSTEE'S SALES
POST-SALE REMEDIES
RAISING DEFENSES IN THE UNLAWFUL DETAINER
(EVICTION) ACTION
DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE
300 + pages

These steps are taken into consideration
when you know you are not going to be able to pay for the loan but a
default is most likely in the future. You can also use some of these to protect
yourself way in advance of any default or foreclosure action.
1. File with the State a UCC1 Financing statement and addendum.
2. File an amended promissory note with the County Recorders office.
(notarized)
3. File a notice of replacement of Trustee and Beneficiary. (notarized)
4. File a Rescission of Power of Attorney. (notarized)
5. Send in a RESPA request.
6. File the UCC 3 amendment.
a. Vested Interest, UCC3
b. Security Agreement, (notarized)
c. Possessory lien. (notarized)
7. Send an AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH. (notarized)
Start educating yourself on the Rules of Court and the Rules of Civil
Procedure.
easy to follow instructions.

Also a easy to use guide on the PRODUCE THE NOTE process...

Using the “produce the note” strategy is something all homeowners facing foreclosure can do. If you believe you’ve been treated unfairly, fight back. We have created templates for a legal request, a letter to your lender and a motion to compel to help you through the process.

How to handle the "UNLAWFUL DETAINER" AND MUCH MUCH MORE!
Dont ever leave your house...


3.BRAND NEW ! Property Protection Package.Proven method to postpone a sale date on your property.All forms included.Along with step by step instructions.

4.
1) SECURED PARTY CREDITOR PROCESS,Properly filing a UCC-1 form to establish a public record that you are not the STRAWMAN and in fact are the holder-in-due-course of it. This is the single most important tool in your tool bag because this alone changes the presumption of law from the side of the STATE to your side;

2) Making yourself the Power of Attorney over the corporate fiction.

3) Copyrighting the STRAWMAN's name. This doesn't just give you another defensive strategy - it gives you a very important offensive weapon, because from this point on, anyone who is coming after your STRAWMAN for anything without your permission is trespassing on your commercial property.

4) Properly filing your Public Notice and Surety Bond.

5) Properly filing these documents in your County Recorders Office.

5.Cracking the Code,redemption in law-how to become a sovereign,includes all forms and how to manual over 500 pages.The Uniform Commercial Code, "UCC," the subject of this manual, is the transcendent, paramount achievement of the efforts of a few thousands of intensely dedicated and single-minded collaborators (dare we call it "conspiracy"?) over the last two-plus millennia. It is the culmination of an almost incomprehensibly complex, systematic, intricate, pervasive, and far-reaching agenda of strategic and tactical global planning to secure absolute legal, financial, social, ecclesiastical, and political (military) dominance over the people of Earth. The fundamental medium chosen for accomplishing these iniquitous aims: Commerce. The UCC, first introduced in 1954, has been developed across the centuries with microscopically excruciating and painstaking attention to detail for avoiding forever risk of detection and revelation of its true nature. It was fully expected that the Code would never be cracked. Proof of this fact is the absence of any device/mechanism for the enforced reversal of the process and recapture of slaves who manage to break free. If you are a slave interested in breaking free, this manual has answers you have been searching for. Embarking on the pages of this volume, however, is comparable with "taking the red pill," and so should be carefully considered by worshipers of Big Brother and the faint of heart--for with such knowledge also comes the innate urge for responsibility, an unpleasant prospect for many. No matter your level of interest in the workings of the world around you and your commitment in making it a better place, if you "decide on the red pill" you will never again see it in the same way. The Code has been cracked, and awaits your decision.

6.How to discharge any traffic citation.2hr recording on mp3 file.

7.100 page booklet on filling your freedom documents.easy to follow instructions.all forms included.

8.All federal reserve routing numbers.

9.Exciting new Information on the 1099 OID Process,
PHILOSOPHY OF THE 1099-A METHOD

Universal Postal Union Stamp Technology and Remedy,everything you will need to know!

1099 OID Process:IRS works for creditors. IRS has forms that allow you to be a creditor and acquire funds that are in escrow. An outstanding balance, for instance, on an American Express card is in escrow. The funds are there – you just have to tell the IRS with the proper tax filings to access those funds and pay that guy off with them or return those funds to me.You can OID any funds that go out of your bank account – and get them back. Acquire escrow funds with a 1099-A.If you file a 1099-OID as Recipient, those get reported on a 1040 if you want to get the funds returned.1099-As don’t get reported; neither do OIDs when you’re the Payor. i1040 is available on the IRS website; it gives line by line instructions for the 1040.

Claiming Original Issuance - meaning any debt obligations you put out in the public. When money comes out of your checking account, when you swipe your credit card, when you sign a promissory note. Credit cards create obligations and thus as the creator you have the right to claim them. With the OID you can also fractionalize your account. Meaning pay for $50 dollars for gas with credit card A, then pay off credit card 'A' with credit card 'B', pay off credit card 'B' with your Checking account. Now with a $50 dollar purchase you created a $150 obligation which you can OID. Whether that is ethical or not is another discussion, but ITS BANKING. It's what banks do. This strategy can be used to fractionalize your account as much as you want. You can also acquire assets. Thus if I have a Student Loan for $15,000. I can use a 1099A acquisition and a 1099 OID, report it on my 1040, and poof I have acquired the asset.


10.Sure fire way to clean up your credit reports.All the inside secrets they dont want you to know.easy and fast!
step by step instructions.

11.Secured Party/Creditor Filing Procedures & Treasury Chargeback instructions/most up to date technology.

12. ***BRAND NEW*** IRS REMEDIES,How to operate in the Civil and Criminal courts.Youve got to get this!this will blow your mind!


13.******ALL NEW ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS TO GO AFTER BILL COLLECTORS,STOPS THEM DEAD IN THERE TRACKS!
Debt collector attack plan/administrative process,with all forms.
1.NOTICE OF CORRECTION FOR FRAUD
2.CERTIFICATE OF NON-RESPONCE
3.CERTIFICATE OF PROTEST
4.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
5.NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE
6.NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND DISHONER
7.NOTICE OF RESCISSION
8.NOTARY CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9.NOTARY PRESENTMENT LETTER
10.NOTICE TO CEASE AND DESIST
and much much more

ALL NEW
The Commercial Lien Strategy
You can file a commercial lien on property in another state or on property you ’ ve never
seen. With a commercial lien, you can attack the personal property of your adversary at
long range rather than merely fighting to defend your own property in your own back
yard. This offensive capability makes the commercial lien a powerful legal weapon. With
the commercial lien, you can literally take the fight to their back yards.
this 85 page tutorial breaks it all down.

You will receive all of these books plus the bonus material I cant name here in pdf/word doc format,they will be sent to you the same day I receive your donation. 

Bitcoin (BTC)  $64.95

Use the Bitcoin address below to donate with Bitcoin:

bc1qqdyd9x2ekphv9z2ngsk408za5glnrdvwp8nj0n

Make sure you are only sending BTC to this address.

To donate using crypto currency email me and I'll send you a link!

 Please email me after sending/making your donation. Also I will be sending you an email shortly after your donation is made please be sure to check your junk/spam folder!

All orders sent out by 10:00 am pst 7 days
thanks for your donation!

email:  creditorsincommerce@proton.me

Postal Power November 2024

The UPU (Universal Postal Union) in Berne, Switzerland, is an extremely significant organization in today's world.   It is formulated by TREATY.     No nation can be recognized as a nation without being in international admiralty in order to have a forum common to all nations for engaging in commerce and resolving disputes.    That is why the USA under the Articles of Confederation could not be recognized as a country.     Every state (colony) was sovereign, with its own common law, which foreclosed other countries from interacting with the USA as a nation in international commerce.   Today, international admiralty is the PRIVATE jurisdiction of the IMF, et al., the creditor in the bankruptcy of essentially every government on Earth. 

The UPU operates under the authority of TREATIES with every country in the world.   It is, as it were, the overlord or overseer over the COMMON interaction of all countries in international commerce.     Every nation has a postal system, and also has reciprocal banking and commercial relationships, whereby ALL are within and under the UPU.    The UPU is the number one military (international admiralty is also military) CONTRACT mover on the planet. 

For this reason one should ALWAYS send all important legal and commercial documents through the POST OFFICE rather than private carriers, UPS, Fed EX, etc., which are firewalls.     We want direct access to the authority — and corresponding availability of remedy and recourse—of the UPU.   For instance, if you post through the US Post Office and the US Postmaster does not provide you with the remedy you request within twenty-one (21) days, you can take the matter to the UPU. 

Involving the authority of the UPU is automatically invoked by the use of (adhesive or the kind that you lick)  postage stamps.   Utilization of stamps includes putting stamps on ANY documents (for clout purposes, not just for mailing) that we wish to introduce into the system.     As long as you use a stamp (of any kind) (an adhesive stamp) you are a player in the game, not a pawn on the board.   If you have time, resources, and the luxury of dealing with something well before expiration of a given time frame, you can use stamps that you consider ideal.     The most preferable stamps are ones that are both large and contain the most colors.   In an emergency situation, or simply if economy is a consideration, ANY stamp will do.   Using a postage stamp and autograph on it makes you the postmaster for that CONTRACT. 

Whenever you put a stamp on a document, inscribe your FULL name (not just your initials and do not use a first or a middle initial) through the stamp at a 45º angle.     The color of ink that you use for this is a function of what color will show up best against the colors in the stamp.   Ideal colors for doing this are purple (royalty), blue (origin of the bond), and gold (the king's [your] edict).    Avoid red at all cost!!!    Obviously, if you have a dark, multi-colored stamp you do not want to use purple or blue ink, since your autograph on it would not stand out as well as if you had used a lighter color ink.     Ideally one could decide on the best color for his autograph and then obtain stamps that best suit one's criteria and taste.     Although a dollar stamp is best, it is a luxury unless one is well off financially.   Otherwise, reserve the use of dollar stamps for crucial instruments, such as travel documents.    The rationale for using two-cent stamps is that in the 19th Century the official postage rate for the de jure (by right according to the law) Post Office of the united States of America was fixed at two (2) cents.    For stamps to carry on one's person for any kind of unexpected encounter or emergency use, this denomination might be ideal. 

Use stamps on all important documents, such as a check, travel documents, paperwork you put in court, etc.       WHERE to put the stamp and HOW MANY stamps to use depend on the document:  

         

On foundational documents and checks, for instance, put a stamp on the right hand corner of the instrument, both on the front and on the back.   

The bottom right hand corner of the face of a check, note, or bill of exchange signifies the LIABILITY.     

Furthermore, the bottom right hand corner of the reverse of the document is the FINAL POSITION on the page, so no one can endorse anything (using a restricted endorsement or otherwise) after that.   YOU want to have the last word.   

If you have only one stamp, put it where you are expected to sign and autograph over it cross-wise.   

In the case of a traffic ticket, for instance, put a stamp on the lower right hand corner where you are supposed to sign and autograph across the stamp at a 45º angle. 

Autographing a stamp not only establishes you as the POSTMASTER of that CONTRACT but constitutes a CROSS-CLAIM.     Using the stamp process on documents presents your adversaries with a problem because their jurisdiction is subordinate to that of the UPU, which you have now invoked for your benefit.   The result in practice of doing this is that whenever those who know what you are doing are recipients of your documents with autographed stamps, they back off.      If they do not, take the matter to the US Postmaster to deal with.   If he will not provide you with your REMEDY, take the matter to the UPU for them to clean up. 

The countries whose stamps would be most effective to use are China, Japan, United States, and Great Britain.   Utilizing these countries covers both East and West.   However, since the US seems to be the point man in implementing the New World Order, one might most advisably use US stamps. 

If you put stamps on documents you submit into court, put a stamp on the back of each page, at the bottom right hand corner.    DO NOT place any stamps on the front of court paperwork since doing so alarms the clerk.    By placing your autographed stamp on the reverse right hand corner you prevent being damaged by one of the tricks of judges these days.    A judge might have your paperwork on his bench, but turned over so only the back side, which is ordinarily blank on every page, is visible.    Then if you ask about your paperwork he might say something like, "Yes, I have your paperwork in front of me but I don't find anything."   He can't see anything on the blank reverse side of a page.    If you place an autographed stamp on the lower right hand corner, you foreclose a judge from engaging in this trick. 

In addition, when it comes to court documents, one side is criminal and the other side is civil.    Using the autographed stamp that you rubber-stamp with your seal (bullet stamp) on the back side of your court documents is evidence that you possess the cancelled obligation on the civil side.    Since there can be no assessment for criminal charges, and you show that you are the holder of the civil assessment, there is no way out for the court. 

Also, in any court document you put in, handwrite your EIN [SS# w.o. the dashes] in GOLD on the top right corner of EVERY page, with the autographed stamp on the back side. 

Use of a notary combined with the postage stamp (and sometime Embassy stamps) gives you a priority mechanism.      Everything is COMMERCE, and all COMMERCE IS CONTRACT.    The MASTER of the CONTRACT is the POST OFFICE, and the UPU is the supreme overlord of the COMMERCE, BANKING, and POSTAL SYSTEMS of the world!!   Use of these stamps in this manner gets the attention of those in the system to whom you provide your paperwork.   It makes YOU the MASTER of that POST OFFICE.      Use of the stamp is especially important when dealing with the major players, such as the FBI, CIA, Secret Service, Treasury, etc.       They understand the significance of what you are doing.     Many times they hand documents back to someone using this approach and say, "Have a good day, sir."   They don't want any untoward repercussions coming back on them. 

If anyone asks you why you are doing what you are doing, suggest that they consult their legal counsel for the significance.   It is not your job to explain THE LAW, nor explain such things as your EXEMPTION or SETOFF ACCOUNT.   The system hangs us by our own words.   We have to give them the evidence, information, contacts, and legal determinations they require to convict us.   The wise words of Calvin Coolidge, the most taciturn president in US history, are apt.    When asked why he spoke so little, he replied, "I have never been hurt by anything I didn't say." 

The bottom line is that whenever you need to sign ANY LEGAL/COMMERCIAL DOCUMENT, put a stamp (even a one (1) cent stamp) over where you are to sign and sign at a 45º angle across the stamp.     Let the recipient deal with the significance and consequences of your actions.   If you are in a court case, or at ANY stage of a proceeding (such as an indictment, summons, complaint, or any other hostile encounter with the system), immediately do the following: 

1. Make a color copy of whatever documents you receive, or scan them in color into your computer; 

2. Stamp the original of the first page of every document with the A4V ; R4V stamp, put a postage stamp in the signature space, and autograph across it at a 45º angle with your full name, using purple or blue ink, handwritten with upper- and lower-case, with your gold-ink bullet stamp (seal) on the upper left-hand portion of the postage stamp; 

Make a color copy of the stamped, autographed pages and/or scan into your computer; 

3. Put a stamp on the lower right-hand-corner of the back of every page and bullet-stamp and autograph it; 

4. Have a notary send each document back to the sender, with a notarial certificate of service, with or without an accompanying/supporting affidavit by you; 

5. If you have an affidavit, put an autographed stamp on the upper right hand corner of the first page and the lower right hand corner of the back of every page.

People who have engaged in this process report that when any knowledgeable judge, attorney, or official sees this, matters change dramatically.    All of these personages know what mail fraud is.    Since autographing the stamp makes you the postmaster of the contract, anyone who interferes is tampering with the mail and engaging in mail fraud.     You can then subpoena the postmaster (either of the post office from which the letter was mailed, or the US Postmaster General, or both), and have them explain what the rules are, under deposition or testimony on the witness stand in open court. 

In addition, most of the time when you get official communication it has a red-meter postage mark on the envelope rather than a cancelled stamp.    This act is mail fraud.    If the envelope has a red-meter postage mark on it, they are the ones who have engaged in mail fraud, because there is no cancelled stamp.    It is the cancelled stamp that has the power; an un-cancelled stamp has nothing.     A red-meter postage mark is an uncancelled stamp.     If it is not cancelled, it is not paid.   One researcher has scanned everything into his computer, and has more red-meter postage marks than he "can shake a stick at."   Officials sending things out by cancelled stamp is a rarity—perhaps, at most, 2%. 

With the red-metered postage you can trace each communication back to the PO from which it was sent, so you can get the postmaster for that PO, as well as the postmaster general for the US, to investigate the mail fraud involved.   It is reasonable to conclude that canceling a stamp both REGISTERS the matter and forms a CONTRACT between the party that cancels the stamp and the UPU.   Using a stamp for postage without canceling it is prima facie evidence that the postmaster of the local PO is committing mail fraud by taking a customer's money and not providing the paid-for service and providing you with the power of a cancelled stamp, as required under the provisions of the UPU.    When you place an autographed stamp on a document you place that DOCUMENT and the CONTRACT underlying it under INTERNATIONAL LAW and TREATY, with which the courts have no jurisdiction to deal.   The system cannot deal with the real you, the living principal (as evidenced and witnessed by jurat).    Nor can officials, attorneys, judges, et al., go against the UPU, INTERNATIONAL LAW, and TREATY.    In addition, they have no authority/jurisdiction to impair a CONTRACT between you (as the LIVING PRINCIPAL) and the UPU (overseer of all world commerce). 

You cancelled the stamp by sealing it and autographing across it.    You did so in capacity of being the living principal, as acknowledged by your seal and the jurat on your documents. 

If you are in a court case, bring in your red-metered envelopes in court and request the judge to direct the prosecutor to explain the red-meter postage stamp.   Then watch their jaws drop. Doing this is especially potent if you also have asked the prosecutor to provide his bar number, since most attorneys in court—especially in US—are not qualified.     An attorney in federal court had better have a six-digit bar card or he committed a FELONY just by walking in and giving his name. 

Lastly, if YOU are charged with mail fraud, subpoena the prosecutor(s) to bring in the evidence on which mail fraud is being alleged, as well as the ORIGINALS of ALL ENVELOPES used for mailing any item connected with the case.   Then the mail fraud involved was committed by the postmaster of the PO in which the envelope was stamped. 

 

Universal Postal Union

The Universal Postal Union (UPU, French: Union postale universelle) is an international organization that coordinates postal policies between member nations, and hence the world-wide postal system.   Each member country agrees to the same set of terms for conducting international postal duties.   Universal Postal Union's headquarters are located in Berne.

Prior to the establishment of the UPU, a country had to conclude a separate postal treaty with each other country that it wished to carry international mail to or from.     The United States called for an international postal congress, which was held in 1863.   This led Heinrich von Stephan, German Minister for Posts, to found the Universal Postal Union, the second oldest international organization (after the ITU).   It was created in 1874, under the name "General Postal Union", as a result of the Treaty of Berne signed on 9 October 1874.     In 1878, the name was changed to "Universal Postal Union".

The UPU established that: 

(1) there should be a more or less uniform flat rate to mail a letter anywhere in the world; 

(2) postal authorities should give equal treatment to foreign and domestic mail; and 

(3) each country should retain all monies it collected for international postage.

One of the most important results of the UPU treaty was that it ceased to be necessary, as it often had been previously, to affix the stamps of any country through which one's letter or package would pass in transit; the UPU provides that stamps of member nations are accepted for the whole international route.

After the foundation of the United Nations, the UPU became its specialized agency.

In 1969 the UPU introduced a new system of payment by which fees were payable between countries according to the difference in the total weight of mail between the respective countries.   These fees were called terminal dues.      As this affected the cost of the delivery of periodicals, the UPU devised a new "threshold" system, which was implemented in 1991.

The system sets separate letter and periodical rates for countries which receive at least 150 tons of mail annually.   For countries with less mail, the original flat rate has been maintained.   The United States has negotiated a separate terminal dues formula with thirteen European countries that includes a rate per piece plus a rate per kilogram, and has a similar arrangement with Canada.

The UPU also operates the system of International Reply Coupons and addresses concerns with ETOEs.

Philatelic activities: the Universal Postal Union, in conjunction with the World Association for the Development of Philately (WADP), has developed the WADP Numbering System (WNS), launched on 1 January 2002.      

The web site (www.wnsstamps.ch/en/) has entries for some 160 countries and emitting postal entities, with over 25,000 registered stamps since 2002.   Many of them have images, which generally remain copyrighted by the issuing country, but which the UPU and WADP permit to be downloaded.

Member countries

The United Nations member states may all become member countries of the UPU.   The 192 United Nations member states are all UPU member countries except Andorra, Marshall Islands, the Federated States of Micronesia and Palau whose situation with regard to the UPU has not yet been settled.   A non-member state of the United Nations may also become a UPU member if two-thirds of the UPU member countries approve its request.    Vatican City is a UPU member country and a non-member state observer of the United Nations (as the Holy See).

The UPU has 191 member countries since Timor-Leste joined on 28 November 2003 and Montenegro on 26 July 2006, including the Dutch territories of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba as a single UPU member, and the British overseas territories, which are not independent states.

Various other non-recognized countries such as Somaliland, Sealand and the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus need to have their mail routed through third countries as the UPU will not allow direct international deliveries (Sealand's mail goes via the UK, TRNC's mail via Turkey, and Somaliland's mail via Ethiopia).   Other entities without direct UPU representation are the Palestinian Authority and the Sahrawi Republic / Western Sahara.

The members are listed below by alphabetical order in their short-form English names, with the date of entering the UPU (multiple entry dates for some countries).   Territories covered by a sovereign member country are included under that country.

• United States of America - 1 July 1875 

• Territories of the United States of America coming within the Union's jurisdiction by virtue of article 23 of the Constitution 

o Guam 

o Puerto Rico 

o American Samoa 

o United States Virgin Islands

UCC 1 Debt Elimination

On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (R-OH) Chairman of the House Banking and Finance Committee brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. To protect themselves from these charges both the House and the Senate, on JUNE 5, 1933, passed House Joint Resolution 192. It provided that the people, who had delivered their gold to the federal government following an illegal proclamation by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their substance, had been taken from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.

The basis of UCC-1 debt elimination derives from HJR-192 in which the Corporate US board of directors, the Congress, removed from the flesh and blood men and women of the several united States of America their substance with which they can pay for things and replaced it with fictitious "money" in the form of debt instruments called Federal Reserve Notes. This created the exemption.

Essentially, the acceptance/redemption debt elimination process obtains access to the trust account that the federal government has been using since your birth to monetize and pay off the national debt. They automatically made the government the trustee of that account and used your energy and talent to fund the national government. With your birth certificate sent from the state in which you were born, the Department of Treasury creates a constructive trust account that permits the corporate United States and all of the other subsidiary corporations, states, counties, cities, etc. to interact with you as a corporate, fictitious entity. They are fictitious public entities that cannot interact with you, the real, living person. But they have convinced you, the living flesh and blood person that they are referring to you. You have voluntarily accommodated this interaction on behalf of your fictitious entity, your "corporation."

By filing your UCC-1 financial statement, security agreement, negotiable bill of exchange and the Federal Reserve routing numbers with the fictitious corporate government entities, you separate yourself from that accommodation and take the position as the first creditor to that debtor. The debt belongs to the Corporate You, but the real you has been making the payments. Now you will stand first in line to utilize the collateral held in your trust account by the government. Using this trust account as they have done, you can assign credit to the bank at which you, the fictitious entity, owe the debt. A simple transaction discharges that debt. Who can now complain that the debt is not satisfied? You have done what you have agreed to do, but the credit did not come from your checking account. It was a non-cash transaction in the public fiction of commerce under the Uniform Commercial Code.

In the case of mortgage elimination, the credit in your “strawman” man account is directed to redeem your note through a commercial Bill of Exchange. This credit is transferred to the bank holding your mortgage to discharge the debt. If the bank accepts this legal tender as per mortgage agreement, you request the reconveyance of the deed back to you. Should the bank refuse the offer of legal tender and will not discharge the debt, they are in dishonor by failing to perform according to the mortgage agreement. As the grantor of that mortgage you can revoke your agreement within 33 days by foreclosing on the bank. Simultaneously, you seek judicial review of the administrative procedures you have followed in accordance with pertinent statutes. Even if the judge refuses to sign the order, in 6 months it is ruled in your favor by default. Should the bank refuse to reconvey the deed, a clear title is provided by transferring the property through three trusted individuals: buyer A for $10 and consideration and after 10 days sold to buyer B for $10 and consideration for another 10 days, buyer C and finally to you for $10 and consideration for 91 days, then it is recommended that the property be sold to your asset protection program in which you are established as its beneficiary. This avoids loss of property made vulnerable to the predatory attorneys due to the new status of a property that is free and clear of debt.

Discharge Almost Any Debt with Proper Use of the UCC....

Understanding the birth registration process

Remember in Admiralty, Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.

To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage, where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward which they brought into this world by delivery[1], the act by which the res the subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards. Then they asked your mother for your legal name[2] in Upper Lower case which consists of one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally funded hospital, an act by which the res[3] the subject matter of a trust or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the commercial registry as cargo under transportation.

The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title[4] in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and registered with the State, via Certificate of registry[5], in commercial maritime law which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel occurred identified by the filing with the Florida State Department of Health, Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.

Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, with the all Upper Lower case name, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s asset, a certificate of indebtedness[6] and funded the bond through the IMF based on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same. So now the IMF has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested with the State of Florida, and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve account.

That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the "defendant", the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for the IMF.

Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the Registrar/ Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she is taken care of properly.

When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you, because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on behalf of the beneficial owner “the trust”, which is resident within a territory occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes “of trade” effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade with the enemy for the beneficial owner the “trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying, presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or chose in action on behalf of the trust.

Checks on Closed Accounts.

In return for the loans from the people, the UNITED STATES keeps track of these loans from the people by tracking the "contributions" of the strawmen- i.e. the corporate shadows of the people, by way of what the UNITED STATES calls the Social Security Number accounts. Since all donations (or loans) of commercial assets from the people to the UNITED STATES are accounted for by way of the SSN accounting, the UNITED STATES knows at any one time how much it owes the ultimate creditors, the living people. Most people believe that the SSN was created to enslave the people by making them takers of benefits. This is false (unless you want it to be true and demand benefits from the UNITED STATES). Everything from the BANKRUPT public under public policy and not under public law is told to us in reverse or backwards. The creation of the SSN accounts was not to make us a nation of slaves. It was to allow the government to take our commercial energy and use it to run the nation, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each and everyone of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. Therefore, the SSN was to track our claims against the UNITED STATES. We are the creditors and they are the debtor. Therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES since we are the creditors and it is the debtor.



The CAFR accounting is the summary results of this accounting of keeping track of the people's contributions and earnings on those contributions. There are two accounts. The one account is the accounting of the first tier contributions. This is the property contributed to the UNITED STATES from the people of the states by way of the acts of the governors of the states in March of 1933. The larger asset account is most likely the earnings off of the commercial investment of the assets contributed to the first account. This second dealing with the investment earnings is most likely a tontine account belonging to the people, as long as they are alive to claim it. After their death, their share of this account is probably estopped with their probate.



Living people loan or contribute credits to the UNITED STATES when they own property and register it, or when they have income and file a tax return. You are in commerce when you have income (i.e.- you sell the labor of the living man for private money) or when you are an "owner" of registered property. Title 31 United States Code §3124 is interesting. It is titled "Exemption from Taxation." This statute says in effect that you are not exempt from taxation under Title 26 of the United States Code if you sell your labor or if you own property that is registered to any state or the united states. Notice that Title 31 of the United States Code is the laws concerning "money". Since there is no public law money now, and only private money of the private Federal Reserve Bank, then there is no ability to purchase any titles to any property anymore. Since there is no ability to purchase titles to property anymore with the private Federal Reserve Notes, then one's "ownership" or property or the sale of one's labor for private "money" has no lawful title transferred in the exchange. Therefore one is always dealing with a "federal" property right in any "ownership" or in any "sale of labor for ‘money". Since one is dealing in a property right of Congress (since they enfranchised the Federal Reserve Bank), then one who sells his labor for "money" or owns property is nothing more than a tenant on the federal feudal plantation and is NOT tax exempt from the statutes of Title 26 mentioned in Title 31 §3124 and being outside the exemption. The tax is the rent for the use of the federal feudal property held by the UNITED STATES in trust for the people and franchised to the federal 14th amendment fictions and corporations to raise a revenue for the democracy.



There is a court case that says the same thing. It is backward to reality, but the truth is there anyway. The agents of the court speak as the agents of YHWH to His people, if they will listen. Scripture says in 1 Cor 13:12: For Now [in the later days] we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part: but then shall I know even as also I am known,' The "glass" is a mirror that inverts the direction from left to right. "Darkly" is the modifier that suggests that the image from the mirror is not easily discernible even when it is in reverse. The Court case is from the UNITED STATES Supreme Court. "If the nation [the man] comes down from its [his] position of sovereignty and enters the domain of commerce, it [he] submit itself [himself] to the same laws that govern individuals therein. It [he] assumes the position of an ordinary citizen and it [he] cannot recede from the fulfillment of its [his] obligations;" 74 Fed. Rep. 145, following 91 U.S. 398. Notice that the words in the brackets have been added by the writer. It is not in the original decision. This case was a commercial case in which the sovereignty of the United States was draw into question. The Supreme Court said that when a sovereign goes into a commercial relationship with private money [not lawful money of account], it looses its sovereignty. The Supreme Court was telling you that we all lost our sovereignty in 1933 when we went into commerce with private FRN's that did not secure title to the goods purchased. Title remained with the "state" under the principle of escheat. The only way to remain sovereign is to be out of commercial activity.



It is interesting that there is something called a COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY EXCEPTION. Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh, states: the - term "commercial-activity exception means: "An exemption from the rule of sovereign immunity, permitting a claim against a foreign state if the claim arises from private acts undertaken by the foreign state, as opposed to the state's public acts." Isn't this definition exactly what we said above. If you are in commerce since 1933, you are not a sovereign. You are not free. Prior to 1933, you could perform a "public act" of "paying" for goods and services with lawful money of account. In 1933 that "public act" was suspended by federal public policy of the bankruptcy. Now all one can do is to use a "private act" of discharging your debt with FRN's, which are not a money and do not purchase a title for the goods and services you bought. Therefore, none of your acts are cloaked with the protection of a "sovereign" anymore. You lost your presumption of "sovereignty" because of your participation in private commercial activity.



Let me put this a different way. It comes out the same in the end. The UNITED STATES has been bankrupt from the beginning. It has only been in various stages of bankruptcy going from bad to worse. The Constitution was the first indicator. If you look up the word "constitution", it will give you all kinds of comfy-cozy stuff. It will make you feel good about this "founding document". If you look up the word "constitutor" you will get a changed opinion. A "constitutor" is one who passes on his debts to another by way of the constitution he writes, so it was with the UNITED STATES. It owed the debts of the Revolutionary War back in the 1770's. The States would not tax themselves to pay these debts. Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, borrowed money from the international bankers to pay these war debts. The Constitution was the means of getting the States to coinsure the UNITED STATES in order to get an extension in paying back the loan to the creditors at the end of the 1780's. The States became endorsers and co-sureties on the national loan. This cosurety was called in in 1933 when the assets of the States were turned over to the UNITED STATES to help discharge the bankruptcy. This was done because of the Constitution of the United States and pursuant thereto.



If you do not believe this, then I will give you another issue to consider. There is a principle called the Rule of 93. It relates to the Rule of 1793 under International Law. "Where a commerce which had previously been considered a monopoly is thrown open, in times of war, to all nations, by a general regulation neutrals have no right to avail themselves of the concession, and their entrance on such trade is a breach of the impartiality they are bound to observe." 2 Halleck, mt. L. 302. This rule came into existence between the Treaties of 1783 and 1794, more commonly termed the Treaty of Peace and the Jay Treaty. The first Treaty of Peace signed in July 16, 1792 recognized the debt that Congress had with the bankers of the Crown of England payable by Jan. 1, 1788, but defaulted on by Congress. This Rule of 93 states that anyone who acts in a commercial manner with one who is a debtor to another, is no longer a neutral party and stands in the place of the debtor.



This is the source of our problem today, people. The UNITED STATES and all the states are codebtors to the bankers. We, the people, were never linked directly with the obligation to discharge the debt. But when we go into a commercial activity with private "money" with the debtors the UNITED STATES and the territorial Buck Act States, then we are no longer neutral, under law, and we have come into breach of the impartiality in the commercial relationship between the UNITED STATES and its Buck Act States and the international creditor banks. By our co-commercial activity under private acts of commerce by using private credit and debt, we have become the debtors by our actions. The only solution is to get out of commerce with private federal "money".



This is where the "closed check" account becomes interesting. When the account is closed, one can access the asset side of the admiralty-maritime pre-paid account. If one cannot access the asset side, then one cannot acquire the right of the creditor to the action. The liability side is the evidence of a debt. A debtor has no remedy in an action. Dealing with open checking accounts is reserved is for "dead" entities who have no original energy. If you are a living soul, you are the source of the energy used by commerce. You are the creditor or the principle.



There is NO MONEY. It was discontinued by an act of Congress in 1933. All we have is the PROMISE to deliver money, if and when it is ever restored, which President Johnson said would never be restored again. If you believe that there is money, then you are a fool and live in a fiction as a lunatic. There are things that some people want you to believe is used "as a money". If money existed, you would not need to have "notes" and promises to pay money. How can the promise to pay money be the money you think you are getting?



The long and short is simple. You never PAY anyone any money. You hand them a due bill to promise to pay them something which does not now exist and to which those in power will not sanction. The reason is simple. If you do not have money, you can not acquire a title to any property. Therefore, all property rests in the hands of the fictitious state which owns everything and you must get permission from the state to do whatever you desire to do. This is called a democracy which is run on the commercial principles of socialism [or communism]. We, as a nation, were taken over in March, 1933, and not one citizen or slave was the wiser and objected. But who cares? The reason was stated in Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26.



The reason for our nation's current condition is not relevant to this discussion. We are interested in the problem of the woman, who in the start of this article, was involved with a visit from the FBI to inquire about why she was using closed checks on a closed checking account.



A closed account in a bank is one which allows one to go back to draft the UNITED STATES to protest the lack of remedy to the loss of Constitutional money. It requests the use of "public" policy to remedy your loss of lawful money as a living people and as a creditor of the commercial bankruptcy. By drafting with a closed account check, used in a proper manner, one can notice the Secretary of the Treasury that you request a "public act" of settlement of an account someone might charge you with under "private acts" of public policy. Using the closed check properly actually puts one in harmony with the principles of HJR 192 as set forth by Congress in 1933 as the remedy for the "creditors", or we the people. You are NOT using the closed check to purchase anything. There is no money. You are involved in an exchange. An exchange is an action between two parties where goods or services are neither bought or sold and are not gifted. Remember, there is a tax or a lawful penalty on gifting or buying and selling when the commercial system is run under foreign private acts or laws. This is the penalty stated in the Rule of 1793 whereby traders in commerce with the debtors are also treated like the debtors and lose all titles and property rights not granted by letters of Marquee (licenses and registrations), to which the party in commerce never has lawful title. He is merely a beneficiary to an implied trust with the "state" as the lawful trustee with the right of control.



When the woman in our example used a closed account check to tender a charge, she was not paying the charge. There is no money. It is a fiction and illusion to assume there is. She was merely telling the so called charging party that if they want to believe there is money, or if they want to believe that there is a charge against her straw-woman, then she will not argue with them. Why would you argue with an insane person who believes that there is money when Congress told everyone there wasn't in 1933. To argue with a lunatic who believes that there is money and that they can charge you to try to collect money which does not exist, is to become a lunatic yourself. The test in this scenario is that the controllers for the government at the high level know there is no money. They test you to see if you believe that there is still money. If you are with them that you do not owe MONEY, then you are the one who raised the factual issue of MONEY, and you must be a lunatic. Their judgments against you for money is another test to see if they can appease you, since you obviously think money exists.



So lets figure this out. If you argue about a debt payable in money, such as a civil or criminal charge against you, then you are a lunatic since you appear to believe that money exists, which since 1933 is not true. You must be crazy. If you "accept" any alleged charges that they imply are related to money [like civil and criminal charges and other commercial presentments], and you never raise the issue of money at all, since it is a fiction and illusion and you do not deal with, talk about, or argue things that are illusions and fictions, then you pass the test from the public, and you just might escape any serious judgments for criminal or civil liabilities that will be thrown at your strawman.



The way that you get out of commerce and do not use money is to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to offset and adjust any charges against your strawman by the use of an "exemption" by way of a PRE-PAID account, which links back to the CAFR accounting and your share of the living man's work energy donated to the state by way of the loans of work energy and property donations through registrations by the strawman. This PRE-PAID account has no money in it currently. It was prepaid when you authorized the state to become the trustee over it as an unselfish act of honor and duty. Since the Secretary of the Treasury is the fiduciary creditor to operate that account according to your draft, the Secretary of the Treasury is the only person who could enter a Certificate of Protest to your draft instrument seeking settlement and closure of any charge that the state might bring against your strawman as a test of your competency as a sovereign. Sovereignty means to serve, not to rule.

click here:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=4XGFACJDZK2AJ

ELIMINATE CREDIT CARD DEBT

There are at least 3 debt elimination procedures that can be used administratively to eliminate credit card debt:

1. challenge the validation of the debt
2. file a commercial lien against YOUR trust
3. novation of contract
Validation as a debt elimination process to eliminate credit card debt
First you must understand that in our money system there are no funds because there is technically, no money. There is only debt and the debt instruments that are used in place of money. The credit card lender did not loan you any money. They didn't even lend you their credit. They aren't allowed to do that. They used YOUR credit to authorize the use of the card. You can very simply establish this by demanding that they validate the debt. That is, someone in a position of authority at the "lending" corporation would have to sign an affidavit under oath that the debt that they claim you owe is a valid debt. They can't and they won't. They have actually committed fraud and now you are asking them to sign for it. No way they want to stick their neck in THAT noose. Failing to sign the affidavit, they just write the debt off as a loss. This normally takes a series of communications and eventually you paint them into a corner and they quit. If they try to have a collection agency get involved, you simply remind them that the collection agency is not a party to the contract and cannot speak for the "lender." They might have an attorney get involved, but the attorney would have to validate the debt, as well, and handled very promptly, exactly and professionally, your process grinds them to a halt.

Filing a commercial lien against your own trust to eliminate credit card debt

Another version of this debt elimination process picks up on the fact that there are no funds, just debt money. Look at a dollar bill. It does say Federal Reserve NOTE, right? It's a debt instrument that's being used as though it were real money. When you agreed to use the credit card, they used your assent, your signature to create the credit. They used your name to create a trust with themselves named as trustees, and they have used that trust as collateral on the national debt.

That collateralization is in an asset account for the trust after it was monetized on the world money market. Eliminate Credit Card Process #3 establishes YOUR right as the trustor and takes that trust back under your control. Under your control you can transfer trust assets to the trust debt account, thereby discharging the debt. Debt elimination by discharging debt.


You next must understand that the debt is not yours personally. You have, since you began doing money transactions, functioned as a voluntary fiduciary representative for that trust account, paying its bills with your own phony debt money. When you set up your first checking account, you accepted this relationship with the trust the government had set up in your name. You have not had control of this trust because you never claimed it and your parents could not control it for you because they were wards of the State like you and had never claimed it..

One way to see this in action is to notice how the "System" maintains the illusion by artifice and deception. Look at your checkbook. How did they present your name? ALL CAPS. Odd, isn't it? That's similar to your name but you most likely don't spell it with all capital letters. What I did a few years back when I needed more check blanks was to ask the people at the bank to CHANGE my name to normal capitalization of the first letters of my name. She COULDN'T do it because her computer would not permit that. The bank personnel will be unaware of why that is. I just shrugged my shoulders, grinned and told her that that was OK, go ahead and do it the way it was. Do they insist on ALL CAPS because they would like to be very clear and allow no mistakes? The clue to that answer is in the line on which you sign your name. It's not a line. It's nearly microscopic words, fine print, some of the finest fine print you might ever encounter. It generally says something like "ONLY AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE".

If you are familiar with the corporate world, you know that only AUTHORIZED personnel are permitted to sign corporate checks. The AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE of the corporation alone has this role. So you the human being has been given authority to sign the checks of your trust, which is an incorporated entity, a fiction.

For over 125 years, corporations have had many of the attributes of human citizens. Making a fictitious entity that has real attributes of a living person in the law, they can deceive you the real human whose name the bank corporations have appropriated from your birth certificate. The birth certificate represents an Official Certificate of Manufacturer that in the hands of the government can be pledged on a debt, the national debt. The IRS is the collection agency for this pledge. Its roots are not in the United States Code but in the necessity of the Federal Reserve and its parent corporation, the IMF, to collect on the debt instrument they hold. This ALL CAPS name is how the US corporation, State corporation, County corporation, or School District corporation can communicate with you through this Corporate YOU. Interesting, isn't it. It gets better.

When you place a commercial lien against the Corporate YOU for what it owes you for paying its bills or simply because it is yours and you have the birth certificate, drivers license, etc to prove it, then and only then do you take back the power that they had usurped from you at birth. The Constitution says that they cannot levy a tax directly on the citizens of a State. So they don't. They levy a tax on a corporation which they control and send the bill to wherever you reside knowing that you will never figure it out. And you will pay and pay obediently.

Similar to The Matrix, you are trapped in a system that extracts your energy through a fiction and fools the real you into identifying with that fiction. As long as you identify with that fiction they can continue to control the real you in many ways because you are chattel for their purposes. Your children can be taken away, sent off to fight in wars, forced to bow to the demands of the System. That's why debt elimination is the path to real freedom. Are you starting to get the picture?

It's all commerce. That's why witnesses in court testify in the "dock." They are vessels. That's why the flag displayed in the courtroom has all that gold braid and fringe. It's an admiralty court that administers the law of commerce. No, the government might not wish to release you from your debt slavery but when you have taken the necessary legal steps to discriminate between you, the real person, and the fictitious person, they cannot by law expect you to pay the bills assessed to the fiction because you have declared that IT owes you and before ANYONE gets paid, you get paid. It's a commercial lien on a debtor entity. You are following THEIR rules to obtain YOUR freedom and independence.

It's not YOUR poor spending habits. It's not even YOUR national debt to be repaid. The malfeasance and misfeasance of the government is at fault. Since they took all of the REAL money away, and took your energy through fraud, they left no means to ACTUALLY pay your bills.  When you agreed to the use of any or all credit cards, YOU, the living human being, created the "money" to pay the bills. The Federal Reserve Bank (a private institution with NO reserves) deposited that fake "money" in THEIR account and has demanded that you pay interest on it until you have obtained sufficient debt instruments ('money") to exchange for the discharge of the debt. That credit card is not yours, either, you know. Look at the name. Take out your credit cards and look at the name...ALL CAPS. The debt is owed by the fiction even though you have had use of the merchandise or services. The fault lies in a government that has coerced, cajoled, or was complicit in extorting energy from you and intentionally or unintentionally fumbling away your heritage and the future of your family. When you finally TAKE RESPONSIBILITY for yourself instead of remaining a ward of the state, you mark your maturity as a real human being who is the creator of government, not its chattel. When you eliminate credit card debt you are also doing your patriotic duty to the real united States of America.
Secret Weapon Against Lawsuits, the IRS, and More!

Banks rarely go to the trouble and expense of attempting to sue someone who has stopped paying on their credit cards, and that's under normal circumstances!  When they know you have evidence that they've violated Federal law it's very unlikely that they will file suit. They certainly don't wish to sign their names to any affidavit of validation. They must obey the regulations that prevent predatory lending in consumer protection laws.

The non-adversarial, administrative approach shows you how to use 3 different ways to use the UCC administrative processes for those who are not in default or in danger of default. All are non-adversarial ways to eliminate credit card debt and cost the same no matter the number of credit cards, the amount owed, or the number of times you wish to use the process to eliminate credit card debt. We show you how to use a commercial filing of a lien against a constructive trust account at the US Treasury which with proper forms and procedures gives you status as First Creditor. Transferring assets within the national bankruptcy you can discharge your debt as you reduce the national debt. You might be able to continue to use the credit card....and keep on discharging it! The third wau to eliminate credit card debt utilizes the law of contract to change the contract the same way the credit card "lender" often changes it without you knowing it. This third process to eliminate credit card debt is called Novation.

click here:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=4XGFACJDZK2AJ

MONEY FROM NOTHING. Montgomery vs. Daly

I. MONEY FROM NOTHING.

It’s been called the most astounding sleight of hand ever devised. The creation of money privatized, and usurped from Congress by a private banking cartel. Most people think money is issued by fiat through the government, but that is not the case. Except for coins, which compose only about one one-thousandth of the total U.S. money supply, all of our money is created by private banks. Federal Reserve Notes (dollar bills) are issued by the Federal Reserve, a private banking corporation, and lent to the government at interest, creating a huge debt to the nation. A debt the nation can never get out of unless the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is abolished. Moreover, Federal Reserve Notes and coins together compose less than 3 percent of the money supply. The other 97 percent is created by commercial banks as loans, and backed by nothing.

You don’t believe banks create the money they lend? Neither did the jury in a landmark Minnesota case, until they heard the evidence. First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Daly (1969) was a courtroom drama worthy of a movie script. Every American that is facing a housing crisis should take note.

Defendant Jerome Daly opposed the bank’s foreclosure on his $14,000 home mortgage loan on the ground that there was no consideration for the loan. “Consideration” (“the thing exchanged”) is an essential element of a contract. All contracts need an offer, acceptance and consideration to be valid.

Daly, an attorney representing himself, argued that the bank had put up no real money for his loan. The courtroom proceedings were recorded by Associate Justice Bill Drexler, whose chief role, he said, was to keep order in a highly charged courtroom where the attorneys were threatening a fist fight. Drexler hadn’t given much credence to the theory of the defense, until Mr. Morgan, the bank’s president, took the stand. To everyone’s surprise, Morgan admitted that the bank routinely created money “out of thin air” for its loans, and that this was standard banking practice. “It sounds like fraud to me,” intoned Presiding Justice Martin Mahoney amid nods from the jurors. In his court memorandum, Justice Mahoney stated:

Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis,  did create the entire $14,000.00 in money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law or Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note.

The court rejected the bank’s claim for foreclosure, and the defendant kept his house. To Daly, the implications were enormous. If bankers were indeed extending credit without consideration – without backing their loans with money they actually had in their vaults and were entitled to lend – a decision declaring their loans void could topple the power base of the world. He wrote in a local news article:

This decision, which is legally sound, has the effect of declaring all private mortgages on real and personal property, and all U.S. and State bonds held by the Federal Reserve, National and State banks to be null and void. This amounts to an emancipation of this Nation from personal, national and state debt purportedly owed to this banking system. Every American owes it to himself . . . to study this decision very carefully . . . for upon it hangs the question of freedom or slavery.

Needless to say, however, the decision failed to change prevailing practice, although it was never overruled. It was heard in a Justice of the Peace Court, an autonomous court system dating back to those frontier days when defendants had trouble traveling to big cities to respond to summonses. In that system (which has now been phased out), judges and courts were pretty much on their own. Justice Mahoney, who was not dependent on campaign financing or hamstrung by precedent, went so far as to threaten to prosecute and expose the bank. He died less than six months after the trial, in a mysterious accident that appeared to involve poisoning. Since that time, a number of defendants have attempted to avoid loan defaults using the defense Daly raised; but they have met with only limited success. As one judge said off the record:

If I let you do that – you and everyone else – it would bring the whole system down. I cannot let you go behind the bar of the bank. We are not going behind that curtain!

From time to time, however, the curtain has been lifted long enough for us to see behind it. A number of reputable authorities have attested to what is going on, including Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920s. He declared in an address at the University of Texas in 1927: “The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented. Banking was conceived in inequity and born in sin . . . . Bankers own the earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with a flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. . . . Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. . . . But, if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit.”

Robert H. Hemphill, Credit Manager of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta in the Great Depression, wrote in 1934: “We are completely dependent on the commercial Banks. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the Banks create ample synthetic money we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp of the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible, but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon.”

Graham Towers, Governor of the Bank of Canada from 1935 to 1955, acknowledged: “Banks create money. That is what they are for. . . . The manufacturing process to make money consists of making an entry in a book. That is all. . . . Each and every time a Bank makes a loan . . . new Bank credit is created — brand new money.”

Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of the Treasury under Eisenhower, said in an interview reported in the August 31, 1959 issue of U.S. News and World Report: “[W]hen a bank makes a loan, it simply adds to the borrower’s deposit account in the bank by the amount of the loan. The money is not taken from anyone else’s deposit; it was not previously paid in to the bank by anyone. It’s new money, created by the bank for the use of the borrower.”

II. The Following is the Actual Court Record of:

FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MONTGOMERY VS. JEROME DALY

IN THE JUSTICE COURT

STATE OF MINNESOTA

COUNTY OF SCOTT

TOWNSHIP OF CREDIT RIVER

JUSTICE MARTIN V. MAHONEY

First National Bank of Montgomery,

Plaintiff

vs

Jerome Daly,

Defendant

JUDGMENT AND DECREE

The above entitled action came on before the Court and a Jury of 12 on December 7, 1968 at 10:00 am.   Plaintiff appeared by its President Lawrence V. Morgan and was represented by its Counsel, R. Mellby. Defendant appeared on his own behalf.

A Jury of Talesmen were called, impaneled and sworn to try the issues in the Case. Lawrence V. Morgan was the only witness called for Plaintiff and Defendant testified as the only witness in his own behalf.

Plaintiff brought this as a Common Law action for the recovery of the possession of Lot 19 Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minn. Plaintiff claimed title to the Real Property in question by foreclosure of a Note and Mortgage Deed dated May 8, 1964 which Plaintiff claimed was in default at the time foreclosure proceedings were started.

Defendant appeared and answered that the Plaintiff created the money and credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry as the consideration for the Note and Mortgage of May 8, 1964 and alleged failure of the consideration for the Mortgage Deed and alleged that the Sheriff’s sale passed no title to plaintiff.

The issues tried to the Jury were whether there was a lawful consideration and whether Defendant had waived his rights to complain about the consideration having paid on the Note for almost 3 years.

Mr. Morgan admitted that all of the money or credit which was used as a consideration was created upon their books, that this was standard banking practice exercised by their bank in combination with the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, another private Bank, further that he knew of no United States Statute or Law that gave the Plaintiff the authority to do this. Plaintiff further claimed that Defendant by using the ledger book created credit and by paying on the Note and Mortgage waived any right to complain about the Consideration and that the Defendant was estopped from doing so.

At 12:15 on December 7, 1968 the Jury returned a unanimous verdict for the Defendant.

Now therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me pursuant to the Declaration of Independence, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, the Constitution of United States and the Constitution and the laws of the State of Minnesota not inconsistent therewith ;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED:

1.That the Plaintiff is not entitled to recover the possession of Lot 19, Fairview Beach, Scott County, Minnesota according to the Plat thereof on file in the Register of Deeds office.

2.That because of failure of a lawful consideration the Note and Mortgage dated May 8, 1964 are null and void.

3.That the Sheriff’s sale of the above described premises held on June 26, 1967 is null and void, of no effect.

4.That the Plaintiff has no right title or interest in said premises or lien thereon as is above described.

5.That any provision in the Minnesota Constitution and any Minnesota Statute binding the jurisdiction of this Court is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and to the Bill of Rights of the Minnesota Constitution and is null and void and that this Court has jurisdiction to render complete Justice in this Cause.

The following memorandum and any supplementary memorandum made and filed by this Court in support of this Judgment is hereby made a part hereof by reference.

BY THE COURT

Dated December 9, 1968

Justice MARTIN V. MAHONEY

Credit River Township

Scott County, Minnesota

MEMORANDUM

The issues in this case were simple. There was no material dispute of the facts for the Jury to resolve.

Plaintiff admitted that it, in combination with the federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, which are for all practical purposes, because of their interlocking activity and practices, and both being Banking Institutions Incorporated under the Laws of the United States, are in the Law to be treated as one and the same Bank, did create the entire $14,000.00 in money or credit upon its own books by bookkeeping entry. That this was the Consideration used to support the Note dated May 8, 1964 and the Mortgage of the same date. The money and credit first came into existence when they created it. Mr. Morgan admitted that no United States Law Statute existed which gave him the right to do this. A lawful consideration must exist and be tendered to support the Note. See Ansheuser-Busch Brewing Company v. Emma Mason, 44 Minn. 318, 46 N.W. 558.   The Jury found that there was no consideration and I agree.   Only God can create something of value out of nothing.

Even if Defendant could be charged with waiver or estoppel as a matter of Law this is no defense to the Plaintiff. The Law leaves wrongdoers where it finds them. See sections 50, 51 and 52 of Am Jur 2nd “Actions” on page 584 – “no action will lie to recover on a claim based upon, or in any manner depending upon, a fraudulent, illegal, or immoral transaction or contract to which Plaintiff was a party.”

Plaintiff’s act of creating credit is not authorized by the Constitution and Laws of the United States, is unconstitutional and void, and is not a lawful consideration in the eyes of the Law to support any thing or upon which any lawful right can be built.

Nothing in the Constitution of the United States limits the jurisdiction of this Court, which is one of original Jurisdiction with right of trial by Jury guaranteed. This is a Common Law action. Minnesota cannot limit or impair the power of this Court to render Complete Justice between the parties.  Any provisions in the Constitution and laws of Minnesota which attempt to do so is repugnant to the Constitution of the United States and void.  No question as to the Jurisdiction of this Court was raised by either party at the trial. Both parties were given complete liberty to submit any and all facts to the Jury, at least in so far as they saw fit.

No complaint was made by Plaintiff that Plaintiff did not receive a fair trial. From the admissions made by Mr. Morgan the path of duty was direct and clear for the Jury.  Their Verdict could not reasonably have been otherwise. Justice was rendered completely and without denial, promptly and without delay, freely and without purchase, conformable to the laws in this Court of December 7, 1968.

BY THE COURT

December 9, 1968

Justice Martin V. Mahoney

Credit River Township

Scott County, Minnesota.

Note: It has never been doubted that a Note given on a Consideration which is prohibited by law is void.  It has been determined, independent of Acts of Congress, that sailing under the license of an enemy is illegal.  The emission of Bills of Credit upon the books of these private Corporations for the purpose of private gain is not warranted by the Constitution of the United States and is unlawful.  See Craig v. Mo. 4 Peters Reports 912.   This Court can tread only that path which is marked out by duty.    M.V.M.

JEROME DALY had his own information to reveal about this case, which establishes that between his own revealed information and the fact that Justice Martin V. Mahoney was murdered 6 months after he entered the Credit River Decision on the books of the Court, why the case was never legally overturned, nor can it be

III. JEROME DALY’S OWN ENTRY

REGARDING JUSTICE MAHONEY’S MEMORANDUM

FORWARD: The above Judgment was entered by the Court on December 9, 1968. The issue there was simple – Nothing in the law gave the Banks the right to create money on their books. The Bank filed a Notice of Appeal within 10 days. The Appeals statutes must be strictly followed, otherwise the District Court does not acquire Jurisdiction upon Appeal. To effect the Appeal the Bank had to deposit $2.00 with the Clerk within 10 days for payment to the Justice when he made his return to the District Court.  The Bank deposited two $1.00 Federal Reserve Notes. The Justice refused the Notes and refused to allow the Appeal upon the grounds that the Notes were unlawful and void for any purpose. The Decision is addressed to the legality of these Notes and the Federal Reserve System. The Cases of Edwards v. Kearnzey and Craig vs Missouri set out in the decision should be studied very carefully as they bear on the inviolability of Contracts. This is the Crux of the whole issue.   Jerome Daly.

SPECIAL NOTATION.  Justice Mahoney denied the use of Federal Reserve Notes, since they represent debt instruments, not true money, from being used to pay for the appeal process itself.  In order to get this overturned, since the bank’s appeal without the payment being recognized was out of time, it would have required that the Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota bring a Title 42, Section 1983 action against the judicial act of Justice Mahoney for a violation of the Constitution of the United States under color of law or authority, and if successful, have the case remanded back to him to either retry the case or allow the appeal to go through.  But the corrupt individuals behind the bank(s) were unable to ever elicit such a decision from any federal court due to the fact that because of their vile hatred for him and what he had done to them and their little Queen’s Scheme, had him murdered (same as them murdering him) just about 6 months later.  And so, the case stands, just as it was.  Amazingly, if they hadn’t been so arrogant about the value of their federal reserve notes and paid the Justice just 2 measly silver dollars, or else 4 measly half dollars, or else 8 measly quarters, or else 20 measly dimes, or else 40 measly nickels, or else 200 measly pennies, they could have had their appeal and would not have had to get blood on their hands.

As it is, they are now known for their bloody ways, and the day will come when the American people will reap vengeance upon them for such a heinous and villainous act.  Amen.