The Court as a Temple of Baal
Court Structure and SymbolismThe court system is described as a synagogue or Temple of Baal, enforcing Babylonian Talmudic Law. The gate or bar represents the veil, through which one enters to offer sacrifices. The bench is the altar, and the judge, an administrative magistrate in a black robe, serves as the high priest (vicarius dei, substitute for deity). The attorney, derived from the Latin “attorn” (to twist or turn), acts as a mediator (vicarius filii dei, substitute for the son of deity), guiding individuals into Roman Civil Law jurisdiction and then into code and rule pleadings, characterized as Babylonian Law. Bailiffs, clerks, and stenographers are the high priest’s servants, recording and accepting the sacrifices. Fines are wave offerings, paid to avoid punishment, and court costs are heave offerings, tributes to the court.Entering the CourtEntering the court voluntarily, such as by hiring an attorney, is considered an act of submission, akin to offering sacrifices. Courts operate under admiralty/maritime law, not Article III common law courts, and proceed only in controversy. To avoid jurisdiction, one must avoid creating controversy.Plea StrategiesIf coerced to enter a plea without understanding the charges’ nature and cause, the appropriate plea is “Non assumpsit, Without prejudice” or “Non assumpsit under duress,” meaning the defendant did not undertake or promise as alleged, with no rights waived (Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Ed.). A “Plea in Bar” is more effective but requires thorough knowledge of procedure. Pleading “Not Guilty” is equivalent to “Nolo Contendere,” as proving a negative is nearly impossible, leading to a likely loss. A “Plea of Innocence” is preferable, as it is a positive plea that can be proven, though courts rarely allow it.Right to SilenceThe privilege against self-incrimination requires active assertion and cannot be retained by hiring an attorney or through passivity (United States v. Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538, 540, D. M.D. Pa. 1947). Disclosing information to an attorney, an officer of the court, triggers discovery, requiring the attorney to share all evidence with the prosecutor (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 1966). Remaining silent and answering questions with questions (e.g., responding to “What is your name?” with “My mother calls me son” or “What is not correct, try again”) avoids giving jurisdiction. One should object to false statements by prosecutors and take exception to false statements by the judge, as failure to do so waives rights.Court Appearance and StatusAppearing “pro se,” “pro per,” or “in propria persona” is discouraged, as it implies a temporary appointment to the BAR (British Aristocratic Regency or British Accreditation Registry), aligning with attorneys who are esquires, apprentice knights practicing law. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that self-representation risks folly (Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S. Ct. 2525, 45 L. Ed. 2d 562, 1975). Instead, appear “sui juris” (by one’s own right) or “suæ potestate esse” (lord or master of the soil), though the latter requires legal knowledge. Avoid volunteering personal information (e.g., family, work, military, educational, or religious background), as it can be used against you. Only the ability to read, write, and speak English is relevant.Immunity and Expert WitnessesThe U.S. Supreme Court grants immunity from civil and criminal prosecution for perjury to judges, attorneys, court reporters, stenographers, law enforcement officers, and expert witnesses testifying for the state (Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325, 75 L. Ed. 2d 96, 103 S. Ct. 1108). Expert witnesses, often paid $500 to $5,000, may provide biased testimony, labeled as sorcery.Officers of the CourtAll court officers are directors, collectors, or representatives of the IRS (Federal Civil Rules, Rule 81(f), removed from public view). The term “God” is described as a Babylonian deity of fortune (Gaud in Old English, Gâd in Hebrew, Strong’s #1408, 1409), not synonymous with the Creator (YHVH). Claiming “God-given rights” in court may lead to punishment, as courts operate under a different framework.Avoiding JurisdictionChristians, as heirs of the Anointed, are cloaked with sovereign immunity but cannot claim sovereignty, as it implies deity. Taking oaths or signing affidavits in court is prohibited (Matthew 5:34-37; James 5:12), but declarations of truth under 28 U.S.C. § 1746(1) are permissible. To secure freedom, record a Surety Bond in twenty-one silver dollars and file a UCC-1 Financing Statement based on a Private Security Agreement to secure the “transmitting utility” or commercial “vessel.” Additional steps include “Acceptance for Value,” “Return for Cause under Lawful Protest without Recourse,” abatement, and petitions for a Bill of Particulars, More Definitive Statement, or Presumption, followed by a Notice and Demand to Strike, all before arraignment.Risks of IncarcerationCourts may declare non-conforming individuals, particularly Christians, as wards of the court via mechanisms like the Baker Act, labeling them insane to seize jurisdiction. In facilities like Chattahoochee, over 7,000 prisoners have allegedly been killed, with 30% wrongfully detained as enemies of the state, and their assets seized. Courts use drugs (described as sorcery, Galatians 5:20; Revelation 21:8) to control and mentally incapacitate victims.Strawman MisconceptionsClaiming to be a strawman is an admission of being a felon, as defined in Title 27 of the U.S. Code and real estate law, indicating illegal transactions. In The Wizard of Oz, the strawman represents a mindless corporate fiction, the Tin Man a Tax Identification Number, and the cowardly lion a government fearful of bankers and attorneys. The yellow brick road leads to the Federal Reserve, with poppies symbolizing opium and heroin, and snow representing cocaine, illustrating a system of control and addiction. The ruby slippers (silver in the 1900 book) symbolize life or wealth, which the system seeks to seize.