Just what is a crime..?



Crime. A positive or negative act in violation of penal law; an offense against the State or United States.

Remember that the States and United States are fictions so, how can you damage a fiction.
What about a Tort?

Tort. ( from Lat. torquere, to twist, tortus, twisted, wrestled aside). A
private or civil wrong or injury, including action for bad faith breach of
contract, for which the court will provide a remedy in the form of an action for damages. K Mart Corp. v. Ponsock, 103 Nev. 39, 732 P.2d 1364, 1368.

A legal wrong committed upon the person or property independent of contract. It may be either (1) a direct invasion of some legal right of the individual; (2) the infraction of some public duty by which special damage accrues to the individual: (3) the violation of some private obligation by which like damage accrues to the individual.
Notice that a crime is an act against the State, but a tort is against an
individual. So if you murder someone how is that a crime against the State?

Please note that when you are charged with an offense, you are charged with violating a code or statute, not for violating the individual. The reason this is being done is because the State claims to own you, so if you kill someone it is the State that has been damaged.
A tort is either mala in se or a breech of contract that causes a damage. There must be intent, but to commit a crime against the State there does not need to be intent.
Mala prohibita. Prohibited wrongs or offenses; acts which are made offenses by positive laws, and prohibited as such. Acts or omissions which are made criminal by statute but which, of themselves, are not criminal. Generally, no criminal intent or mens rea is required and the mere accomplishment of the act or omission is sufficient for criminal liability. Term is used in contrast to mala in se which are acts which are wrong in themselves such as robbery.

When you don't file a Form 1040, that is an omission.

Statute. A formal written enactment of a legislative body, whether federal, state, city, or county. An act of the legislature declaring, commanding, or prohibiting something; a particular law enacted and established by the will of the legislative department of government; the written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms necessary to constitute it the law of the state. Such may be public or private, declaratory, mandatory, directory, or enabling in nature.
Will. Wish; desire; pleasure; inclination; choice; the faculty of conscious, and especially of deliberate, action. When a person expresses his "will" that a particular disposition be made of his property, his words are words of command, and the word "will" as so used is mandatory, comprehensive, and dispositive in nature.
Will. An Instrument by which a person makes a disposition of his real and
personal property, to take effect after his death, and which by its own nature is ambulatory and revocable during his lifetime. In re Brown's Estate, Tex Civ. App., 507 S.W.2d 801, 803.
Instrument. Anything reduced to writing, a document of a formal or solemn character, a writing given as a means of affording evidence. A document or writing which gives formal expression to a legal act or agreement, for the purpose of creating, securing, modifying, or terminating a right. A writing executed and delivered as the evidence of an act or agreement. Moore v. Diamond Dry Goods Co., 47 Ariz 128, 54 P.2d 553, 554.
Do you understand the Two different ways they use the word "will." What they do is reduce their "will" to writing and then enforce it at the point of a gun. This writing is also called a "Will."
Will, Statute, Instrument, and Code are synonymous.
Do you understand where this going? "Will" is the disposition of property by someone's command. A Statute is the Written Will of a Legislature. It used to be stated as "will and testament" Do you understand that when a Legislature passes an act they are creating or modifying a will. You are considered property of the State. Are you getting the picture? A code or statute is a "Will."

The Codes and Statutes of every State are Wills.

(Note. When you are charged and warehoused in a jail it is because you went against the "Will" of your "Master." It is not because you harmed another Being. --Nicole)
Does not a Form 1040 have a label?
Label. Anything appended to a larger writing, as a codicil.

In English law, a copy of a writ in the Exchequer.

Exchequer. That department of the English government which has charge of the collection of the national revenue; the treasury department.

Codicil. A supplement or addition to a will; it may explain, modify, add to, subtract from, qualify, alter, restrain or revoke provisions in existing will. Such does not purport to dispose of entire estate or to contain the entire will of testator, nor does it ordinarily expressly or by necessary implication revoke in toto a prior will. In re Crooke Estate, 388 Pa. 125, 130 A.2d 185, 187.
Do you understand why people are forced to file a Form 1040 ? Because King George was the Prince Elector and Arch Treasurer of the Holy Roman Empire and of the UNITEDSTATES of AMERICA.

The Constitution is the "Will." Why do you think in the
preamble to the Constitution it says "to ourselves and our Posterity?" Just read Article six section one. Remember the loans, IRS Publication 6209 (1040 for UK), the First Bank of the United States and numerous debt collection acts. Do you understand why in 26 U.S.C. there is no law requiring you to file? It is the Constitution that requires you to file, Article six section one! Do the IRS agents know this? Look at all of the Acts (Supplements to the Will) that have been passed to collect your labor, the symbols (electrons) that represent your labor. Now do you understand why the Constitution was never put to the people for a vote? It is because they were the property (citizens, persons, etc.) mentioned in the Will (Constitution). Now do you see why the Constitution was drafted in secret? Do you understand that when you pay with your labor you are adding electrons to the Estate and when you get a refund (electrons) you are subtracting from the Estate? Do you understand the importance of Codicil and Label? They don't even have to connect the machine to our udders, we are self-milking slaves.

The words charge and discharge are used in the imaginary laws of commerce because we are forced through our ignorance to use electrons as a medium of exchange. Don't you ever wonder why you are asked by a cashier if you would like to charge it? The slip that the cashier hands you is the symbol of the electrons that have just entered the Circuit. Why do you think when you are dragged into one of their 'courts' they tell you that you have been 'charged'? What do you think a 'Transmitting Utility' in Article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code is? So guess what the Transmitter is? Guess what is being broadcast, charged and discharged? People do not see the wave only the symbol of the wave. They do not know that the wave even exists.
Why do you think that they pass bills? A bill is a charge for goods or services. Then you have the 'Bill of Rights'. A 'Right' is one mans ability with the assistance of the state to control others (Blacks Law Dict.). That is why you must pay a filing fee when you file a suit against someone. You are being charged to use the State to force other people to be jurors, witnesses etc. Jurors are people who are being controlled by the State on your behalf.
This is just a sampling of what has been done to us because of our greed, laziness, contempt for our fellow man, having the nerve to pretend to make laws and wanting something for nothing.
We are having Electronic Warfare perpetrated on us. Our very physical bodies work upon electricity. Our thoughts are electricity. The thoughts that are placed into our minds are placed there through the use of electricity. The thoughts that you think are your own are not. You have to become aware. Please make an attempt to analyze the program that has been placed in you. You have to understand that the person who is in 'charge' is the one who controls thought by way of controlling the electricity in your brain. Think about it. If you had a plumber to your home and he tracked mud all over your carpet you would phone the company who employed him and ask to speak to the person in charge. The person in charge is the one who controls the electric current in the plumbers brain.
Now if the plumber can not be controlled, he will be 'fired' or in other words discharged.
What do people do when they are upset, they write to a legislator, one of their Masters? Legislatures were created for one purpose, to make you the property and to manage the electrical current in your brain. If a group of people can command you to act or not to act and take your labor, what are you? If they have the power to declare that an act that is not criminal, is a criminal act, what are they? You are a slave and they are your master.
The thought that legislators, judges etc are in 'charge' has been willfully and deliberately placed in your brain so that you will be their slaves.

E

I x R
A bank is a capacitor in which the electrons flow to from ground. A check or money order etc. are the symbol which represents the electrons. (See definition of money in U.C.C.) A loan is actually the procedure that is done to cause electrons to enter into the circuit. The check that you receive from the bank is the symbol of the electrons that have been put into a capacitor (account) in your name. This is accomplished by a few key strokes on a computer key board.
The charge (electrons) are transferred from account to account (capacitor to capacitor) when a good or service is transmitted. This is done either by wire or satellite. (See Electronic Fund Transfer Blacks Law Dict. 6th Ed.) Remember an electron is both a wave and a particle. The system must never be allowed to become balanced. There has to always be a debt (something owed) in order for the electrons to flow. If electrons were not removed from the circuit the capacitors would all become equally charged and all commerce would cease. If the capacitors were all equal and the circuit was balanced how could one capacitor discharge into another. The Internal Revenue Service withdraws electrons from the Circuit by way of what is called an 'Income Tax'. Income is the Electrons that have flowed into the circuit. There are other ways that remove electrons but this is the most noticeable. There has to be a load on the system in order for the electrons to flow. This must be done in order to allow commerce to flow. A debt can never be paid. A debt can only be discharged. The Circuit can be controlled by changing the Force, Current, or Resistance. Your labor is actually dissipated. The harder the people labor the more electrons they remove from the Circuit. There becomes too many electrons in the Circuit for the amount of goods and services consumed. So 'Taxes' must be raised or, in other words, the load must be increased. When they tell you that the economy is expanding it means that the Circuit is getting larger. Notice that when they tell you the economy is expanding most people are working harder and their standard of living is dropping.
Now, what do the electrons symbolize? People exist by symbols. Everything in this fictional world symbolizes something else.
Those who refuse to bow to the IRS are in actuality keeping those who do alive. Those who bow to the IRS are destroying themselves. If we do not send electrons to the Banks and the IRS, this ultimate system of control will come crashing to the GROUND. In the present situation the peoples standard of living can only go down. Both parents now must labor in order to survive. Any variable in the system can modify it. One who is skilled in the art of controlling the Circuit is called an Economist.
It is impossible for the mass of people to be paranoid. Paranoia is defined as a heightened sense of awareness. People are not even at the level of being aware, let alone paranoid. They (the mass of people) have their voltage (thoughts) supplied to them. How can you be aware when in your entire life you have never had a thought?


THE END

PRIVATE REGISTERED SETOFF BOND (example)

 

 

PRIVATE REGISTERED SETOFF BOND


BOND NUMBER

2010040601

 

 

REGISTERED


CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE

ucc DOCUMENT NO.: 20000000001

ucc FILING NO.: 10-9876543210

 

 
 


$4,500,000.00

 

 

Pay to the Order of:

UNITED STATES TREASURY (“PAYEE”)

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20220

Issue Date:

 

Maturity Date:

April 6, 2010

 

April 5, 2040

For Further Credit to:

JOHN H DOE 123-45-6789; ABC BANK, N.A. ACCOUNT # 1000000201

By/On/Through:

John Henry Doe, Principal (“Creditor”)

Private Offset Account No. 123456789

 

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, which are intended to constitute a Private Registered Setoff Bond; and WHEREAS, only fiat money exists in circulation for the discharge of debt:

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned Creditor being of sound mind and honorable intentions, for the purposes of protecting secured interests, reserving rights of recourse, remedy and subrogation, and maintaining the honor of the above-named Account Holders and Accounts, does by necessity hereby issue this Private Registered Setoff Bond, tendered, in good faith, as full satisfaction of any and all claims and/or demands,  to wit: In the Creditor’s rightful Sui Juris status, the Creditor does hereby knowingly and with full disclosure hold, bind and obligate Creditor’s collateral jointly and severally by this instrument as voluntary surety for all of the above-noted Account Holders and Accounts, each severally, for any amount up to and including: Four-million Five-hundred Thousand United States Dollars, i.e., $4,500,000.00, insuring, underwriting, indemnifying and discharging the said Account Holders and Accounts against any and all pre-existing, current and future losses, costs, debts, taxes, encumbrances, deficits, deficiencies, liens, judgments, true bills, obligations of contract or performance, defaults, charges, and any and all other obligations as may exist or come to exist during the term of this bond (jointly and severally “Liabilities”), thereby honorably discharging and vacating dollar-for-dollar all such obligations until the sum or the term of this bond is exhausted.  The PAYEE shall have ten (10) days from presentment to dishonor this bond by returning it to the Principal by registered mail at the exact mailing location shown below.  Failure to return this bond will stipulate acceptance and honor.

SATISFACTION OF LIABILITIES. The PAYEE  may demand payment of all or any portion hereof at its discretion by posting the payment to the Private Offset Account above-indicated dollar-for-dollar and transferring the obligation by TT&L or presentment to:

 

Steven Terner Mnuchin (“Secretary”)

Secretary of the Treasury

U.S. Department of the Treasury

1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20220

 

PRIVATE OFFSET ACCOUNT. The PAYEE shall by the end of business on the day of presentment and in any case no later than one business day thereafter post the full or partial value of this bond to satisfy, set-off, pay, terminate, and discharge dollar-for-dollar in accord with generally accepted accounting principles any and all past, present, and/or future debts, liabilities, encumbrances, deficiencies, deficits, liens, charges, fees, interest, bills, true bills, taxes, obligations of contract and/or performance, instruments of debt, and all other obligations (jointly and severally “Liabilities”) attributed to the Account Holders and Accounts above-noted.

AMOUNT DUE:                                                            PAYEE enter the amount due below

 

 

 


MATURITY.  Upon demand, the Secretary shall release the obligation dollar-for-dollar to the extent so paid, with the balance of the bond remaining in full force and effect.  Upon satisfaction of this obligation in full, the Secretary shall mark this bond cancelled and return it bearing the marks of cancellation to the Principal or the Principal’s heirs by registered mail, all profits and proceeds accruing since presentment to remain with the Secretary for the benefit and use of the United States Department of the Treasury.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Signatory to this bond does hereby affix his respective hand and seal on this Second day of the Eighth month in the year Two Thousand and Ten.

 

 

By: ________________________________________    (seal)

John Henry Doe, Principal/Underwriter

Exemption ID # 123456789

in care of: 1234 Creditor Street

Huntington Beach, California

Non-domestic without the U.S.

 

 
 

The Republic lasted 7 years

1776 Declaration of Independence established, through the Articles of Confederation, a sovereign republic. The Republic lasted 7 years. 

1782 National government went to the States and asked them to foot the bill for the Revolutionary War and the States said they would not pay the debt. National government was therefore forced to form a Constitution. The national government lost its sovereignty. A constitution (security, with sureties) is created  by a constitutor – one who passes his debts to a 3rd party. 

September 17, 1789 [original, up to 13 amendments (13th no titles of nobility) then ceased to exist]Constitution was a negotiable, debt, security instrument which the national debt was attached to. The King of  England bought the debt (and legal title over the national government’s property) and the democracy was formed (and the Republic lost its sovereignty via international bankruptcy).  
The democracy operates under military tribunal laws, where the minute you’re charged, you’re guilty.International bankruptcy lasts 70 years. At the end of the bankruptcy, the debt is due. The States had signed on as sureties for the debt.
 1791 Alexander Hamilton created the Bank of the U.S. (with a 20 year charter) where the securities were held. 

1811 Congress decided not to renew the Bank of the U.S. 

1812 War of 1812 Britain took possession of all the federal courts (where the titles are). 

1816 Another central bank but Andrew Jackson nixed it. The country operated at a surplus for the only time, but did he pay the debts or was he a belligerent debtor? 

1859 Civil War – the northern States went to the Southern states which had most of the money (gold,cotton, resources, wealth) and the South said no we’re not paying – we’ll start our own country. Because of their dishonor with the international bankers, and it was the will of the creditors to get the debt paid or take sureties for the debt; hence the States lost their sovereignty – they had signed the first Constitution that secured the debt.
now the international creditors took control of the State’s property and the States (who were surety for the debt) no longer had  their sovereignty.Debtors are not sovereign; creditors control. If you control any property, you have legal title to it; you are sovereign and the property is sovereign. Creditors are willing to risk it all. Creditors bring remedy,resolution, not  necessarily FRNs.
 1860’s new federal Constitution. Republic was insolvent or bankrupt. (Military) Democracy. Generals and even Privates have titles of nobility. U.S. citizens are all privates. New 13th  Amendment: No Involuntary Servitude. The Republic, however, prior to that, is (still) in involuntary servitude which has created the entire international    bankruptcy    system. 


1873(?) UPU (universal postal union)precursor to NWO. All government exists by virtue of its postal system. Postal routes laid the foundation for commerce. 
1909 Jekyll island - Federal Reserve, income tax in 1913. The IRS is foreign despite the fact that its employees are not. Taxes don’t go to operating the country; they go to pay the debt to the creditors. The creditors have surety through the Fed. 
1929 Stock market crash. Bankruptcy due and we didn’t pay (dishonor) again. This time the people lost their sovereignty. There was confiscation of gold, silver and all legal (allodial) title. They also took titleto your body through a certificate of title known as your birth certificate (which is a bond and goes to the Dept. of Commerce). They took it to give you a benefit. You can be irresponsible because they took control of the slaves on the plantation. The people (who were surety for the debt) lost their sovereignty.[Fascism is the government having all legal titles.][You can get legal title back.]Allodial  title is legal and equitable title.If you took your grant deed, accepted it for value and gave it back to the county, you’d be removed from the assessor’s parcel numbering system – you’d be off their grid; no more property tax. You’d be responsible for the property, which means bonding for sewage, bonding the police department, fire department, etc. Any benefits and privileges your property receives, you become responsible for. You paid property tax because the State or County took responsibility for those things. 
1933 Social Security. State has all legal title.

1999 State now not only has legal title to everything, but controls equitable title to almost everything,electronically.. We went from fascism to communism.

 We’re under admiralty or maritime law because it has grace and mercy. Common law is execution on thelaw, but the current common law is admiralty. We’re all vessels. They give us a berth in admiralty (app.for b/c). The b/c is your foreign situs trust; it’s what gives you the ability to operate with all the other vessels. Then the Federal Corporation (estab. 1859) comes along and gives its members (citizens) benefits & privileges (social insurance contract or Soc. Sec.) – another trust,c’est eque or implied trust. You’re a debtor who doesn’t have to pay (there is no gold in use to pay anyway; you get to operate in commerce; you get to go to jail, etc.

The United States does not have any employees because there is no longer a United States! No more reorganizations. After over 200 years of bankruptcy it is finally over. (Executive Order 12803)

 In 1992, George H.W. Bush signed Executive Order 12803, which gave D.C. the authority to sell America's infrastructure. They called this authority "Infrastructure Privatization." E.O. 12803 tells us this power cleared the way for the "disposition or transfer of an infrastructure "asset" such as by sale or by long-term lease from a State or local government to a private party."

 

E.O. 12803 also lists examples of America's saleable and/or lease-able infrastructure:

 

· Roads

· Tunnels

· Bridges

· Electricity supply facilities

· Mass transit

· Rail transportation

· Airports

· Ports

· Waterways

· Recycling/wastewater treatment facilities

· Solid waste disposal facilities

· Hospitals

· Prisons

· Schools

· Housing

 

E.O. 12803 tells us that this list represents infrastructure "examples." Let us, therefore, assume that this is not the complete list of America's saleable infrastructure. However, this list is a stunning confession.

 

Notice that all items listed in 12803 are the very same infrastructure items listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders (see here). Martial Law kicks in to power during declared states of emergency and with the single signature of the president. Strangely (and ignorantly), we currently have multiple declared states of emergency:

 

· Act of March 9, 1933, a declared state of emergency at the request of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. This state of emergency was never lifted.

 

· Global pandemic - Level 6

· Mortgage/housing crisis

· Banking/lending crisis

· Automobile industry crisis

· Insurance industry crisis

· Healthcare crisis

· Southwestern border crisis

· Black market drug crisis

· National education crisis

· Nature/global warming crisis

· Jobs/unemployment crisis

· On-going weather and forest fire crises

· Extreme and unread congressional legislation crisis due to on-going crises

 

What are the odds of complete and total social and "natural" crisis in every single facet of our lives and all at the same time? I will tell you how it was accomplished with simple math:

 

Federal Reserve System + Politicians + Tell-A-Vision = Assembly Line Crises. It is called the Hegelian Dialectic Show.

 

Everything in the country, including the current planet-sized medical emergency, is in crisis. So enters Martial Law.

Think of our president's promises to "change" the country and to fix the economy (which the Federal Reserve and Congress destroyed) by rebuilding America's infrastructure, including "21st Century schools" and by greening-up our living standards and conditions (International Code Council, Carbon Credits, Waxman-Markey Climate Bill, etc.) - minus, of course, privately owned land and homes (Agenda 21). In the last six months, consider the massive growth of the Federal Government, the national debt, and the powers of the Federal Reserve Central Banking System - all with stated intentions of fixing the economy that they single-handedly destroyed - and fixing it with "infrastructure" projects.

 

As Martial Law militarily guards all of E.O. 12803's infrastructure as listed in the Order, and with homeland paramilitary armies holding practice drills with foreign armies, local law enforcement, and emergency responders all across the nation (and with a big drill planned July 27th through July 31st in FEMA Region 6),

 

And with all public schools, private schools, and universities forced to have "lock-down policies" and to be forced-used as quarantine holding tanks, and with all Americans having been repeatedly told to prepare for an emergency (meaning an emergency that will bring Martial Law into the full light of day, which the "drills" have clearly done),

 

AND the very same infrastructures listed in Executive Order 12803 are also listed in all Martial Law Executive Orders, and all these infrastructures having been for sale, lease-able, or having been sold during the last 17 years- including our children's schools, our hospitals, and our homes - I suggest to you that you are witnessing Central Banking Debt Magic at its finest moment. Wouldn't you love to know how much money has been made by selling our nation to the highest bidders?

 

Let us review:

 

1. The country's infrastructure has been for sale for 17 years. Roads, tunnels, bridges, electricity supply facilities, mass transit, rail transportation, airports, ports, waterways, water supply facilities, recycling/wastewater facilities, solid waste facilities, prisons, hospitals, schools, and housing -- this being of "examples" of saleable infrastructure and not the entire list of saleable items according to E.O. 12803--so the question begs: What exactly has been sold to "private parties in our nation? We would like to see the complete list. We know that many highway systems have been sold to foreign countries, but what of the other listed items? Have they been sold as well?

 

If so, who owns them, and more to the question, which D.C. department sold them and for how much? Did the Federal Reserve and Congress sell our nation? Where is the paperwork? Did they repay any of America's debt that they purposefully created with their pyramid fiat money lending schemes? And why are they still raising our taxes if America is no longer America but belongs to foreign nations or "private parties?" Since the Federal Reserve is a "private" corporation, did the Fed buy any of America's infrastructure "assets?"

 

As American "housing" is on 12803's list, and since D.C. recently took over the mortgage industry, has the housing market been sold and/or leased to a "private party" like a foreign nation or the Federal Reserve Corporation? Are the American people tenants to unknown parties? Are American children occupying foreign-owned schools, and are our loved ones lying in foreign hospitals that are clearly chock-full of foreign doctors? Equally, who, exactly, is financing the building of 21st Century schools and classrooms complete with foreign curricula? The questions beg: who are the foreigners....the foreigners or the American people?

 

More to the point, who is dissolving, partitioning, and/or divvying up our nation? Is it Obama? Geithner? Bernacke? Bushes? Clintons? FDR? Wilson? American morons?

 

It would seem that we are preparing for the Big Transfer - the transfer of our nation to and beneath a new authority or several new authorities. It now makes a great deal of sense why foreign troops have been cross-training with our new paramilitary systems, and yes, there are foreign troops on American soil, which I fear may not be American soil at all. Equally, multiculturalism suddenly makes a great deal of sense. I believe we can call it "behavior modification" so that we the stupid people will behave and be obedient under the new rules of new and foreign leaders.

 

I ask you, has our nation been sold out from under us, and without our knowledge? Could there be any other possible explanation for selling the most critical components of our country, while at the same time creating new, multicultural and cross-trained armies; permanently bankrupting the nation and selling its debt to foreign countries, and having Martial Law orders written specifically to protect the sold "assets" of our nation--including our schools and homes? Are America's new owners to be protected by new Martial Law armies, cross-trained with foreign armies, while our "traditional" military is spread all over the planet - except here with its nation's people? Are we being transferred to new ownership as we speak?

 

Consider:

 

Washington D.C. debts were sold to foreign nations.

 

· Washington D.C. = politicians

· Debts = Federal Reserve Central (Fiat) Banking

· Sold = Wall Street

 

Is it not realistic to think that big league politicians, bankers, and CEOs are loyal to no nation when they were massively enriched by internationalized banking, internationalized trade, absurd and illegal taxation, and by interest rates forced upon the people of this nation, while at the same time selling our nation to other central banks around the world and "private parties" - and for personal profit? Truth is, they sold the infrastructure first, and then they sold we the people as tax generators and life-long human resources to their global banking and business partners in crime.

 

What is the crime, you ask? The Federal Reserve, which is a piece of a global banking cartel, and their politicians and CEO partners who made counterfeiting and Ponzi/pyramid schemes legalized theft on continental scales. Your country is 1) not your country and, 2) not what you thought it was for at least 100 years. You are going to have to seek God's grace to be relieved from the bitterness of that truth. Today, we don't know under whose authority we live, but Washington, D.C. and the Federal Reserve do know.

 

Big, big changes are on the horizon. All I can tell you is to remember that freedom, granted to all by God, is first and foremost a state of mind. Pray for guidance. Prepare yourselves because Obama spoke the truth. It is all about "infrastructure." The promised change has arrived. The question is this: who owns America? Who have the American people been committed to serving and beneath what form of government?

 

We can pretty much assume that Asia owns a very large chunk of America, as does Great Britain, India, Middle Eastern countries, and perhaps Mexico and Canada, as well. We can also assume that Martial Law armies will be guarding all the sold "assets" during what could be an extraordinary and massively tyrannical transfer of power. The love of money is the root of all evil. No truer words were ever spoken.

 

 3 URGENT QUESTIONS

1. Will you allow a vial of fluid to be injected into your bloodstream containing experimental "synthetic" (artificial) RNA antibodies without understanding the ingredients and possible side-effects?

2. Do you blindly trust Pfizer, CNN, Bill Gates, Fauci and the biased media monopolies when they tell you the experimental vaccine is safe?


3. What do you know about RNA? About your natural antibodies? About what could happen when 'unnatural synthetic antibodies' are injected into your body? Did you know these artificial antibodies are PERMANENT? They can NEVER be removed.


pfizer

Pfizer claims their COVID vaccine is “90% effective”. Since there is no accurate test for COVID, the question is: "Effective for what?"


Do you trust criminal organizations? That’s what Pfizer is. In fact, they may be the largest criminal organization in the world.


Have a look here.


vaccineimpact.com/2020/criminal-pfizer-inc-wins-covid-vaccine-race-hundreds-of-millions-of-doses-expected-to-be-ready-within-weeks/




BILL GATES ON VIDEO ADMITTING VACCINES WILL CHANGE YOUR DNA



Watch this SHOCKING video admission at 1:45 by immunologist and geneticist Sir John Bell who states,"These vaccines are unlikely to 'completely sterilize' a population.


STERILIZE???? Are you paying attention???


 


Dr. Christiane Northrop is a leading medical authority in the field of women's health and wellness and a New York Times best selling author.


SHE HAS PUT HER CAREER AND REPUTATION ON THE LINE TO DELIVER THIS FACTUAL VIDEO


 

fraud

off-guardian.org/2020/11/17/covid19-evidence-of-global-fraud


Those responsible for the crime of conspiracy to commit global fraud should be tried. If found guilty they should be imprisoned while the rest of us try to repair the damage they have already inflicted.


Here is a detailed "Covid-19 evidence-of-fraud" REPORT.


<---

IF YOU ARE TAKEN TO JAIL

This page does not have to go into any lengthy detail. Remember, if you are taken to jail via a
'fresh arrest,' try to get the names of the officers involved in your arrest who cause the most
injury, threats or pain. Try to keep the details of your 'fresh arrest' in your head, as most likely,
they won't give you paper & pencil. DO NOT SIGN IN, DO NOT ANSWER QUESTIONS,
GIVE FINGERPRINTS, ETC., ONLY AFfER THEIR THREATS, AND DO NOT SIGN
WHEN YOU' RE GETTING OUT. As soon as you are out, you need to do up an affidavit of all
the facts of that unlawful arrest! It is best if you have someone that has your power of attorney to
assist you in these matters until you are out.
But, when you find yourself in a jail cell ... for whatever reason you' ve heard the story, seen it in
the movies... that you have a right to ONE phone call. So the question is "who do you call?"
Well, it's not to call your lawyer (God forbid!), your girlfriend, your pastor, the bondsman, your
buddy or your bookie! THE ONLY REASON FOR THE ONE PHONE CALL IS TO CALL
N THE JUDGE!


Seek the name of the judge and try to get the phone number from the jailers. Be business like and
polite, but firm! It is part of your 'Due Process', as they say ... you have the right to one phone
call! Merely state that you need the number so that you can request an appearance bond
without fees or cost. This must be requested preferably before your arraignment.
Note; The Appearance Bond is the Bond that the Prosecutor puts up to bond the action brought
forward by the traffic officer/cop or he himself. They created the 'action,' they have to bond the
action in the event that they injure you in their misapplication of statutes or other injuries that
may occur!
If you are denied the phone call, then make the request at the next available opportunity, either
with any 'agent' to comes to you and or when you are taken into court for arraignment.
Remember, you want the 'Appearance Bond' as part of your due process, and if the judge
produces the bond, you can state that you "accept the bond for value, I do not intend to challenge
the facts of the case" (or it can be stated;) "I plead guilty to charges in behalf of the
defendant/debtor, but that's not me ... and I request the court to discharge the charges via the
Bond and I request that the Bond be released to me."
If the judge denies the 'bond,' he then has denied you remedy (due process), committed
commercial fraud, (as the charges are not laid on you, but on the corporate fiction
Defendant/debtor), and since you cannot pay the fine or pay off the commercial charge, and can
only be 'discharged,' and being the 'insurance policy' via the bond is created by the prosecutor
or some other agent via the 'case,' is to be brought forward to indemnify the
man/creditor/sovereign, in light of the bankruptcy, as everything is insured! But the system most
always get's the 'arrestee' (you) to bond the case yourself or get you to plead guilty ... and or
consent to the charges!
If the bond is denied, at your next available opportunity, and or with someone you have given
power of attorney to if you are still incarcerated, you can exercise your exclusive remedy ... and
that is a Tort Claim!
A FEW CASE CITES

LISTED HERE FOR REFERENCE ONLY!

When an individual is detained, without warrant and without having
committed a crime (traffic infractions are not crimes), the detention is a
false arrest and unlawful imprisonment:

DAMAGES AWARDED
TREZEVANT v. CITY OF TAMPA,741 F2d 336 (11th Cir. 1984) Motorist
illegally held for 23 minutes on a traffic charge was awarded $25,000 in
damages. (Sets foundation for $75,OOO/hr., l,600,OOO/day)

CIVIL RIGHTS
SANDERS v. ENGLISH, 950 F2d 1036 (6th Cir. 1992) False arrest, illegal
detention (false imprisonment), and malicious prosecution are recognized
as causes of action under Title 42 Section 1983. ( •.• and TORT!)

PRECEDENT
JAMES v. KENTUCKY, 466 US 341, 80 LED 2d 346, 104 S Ct. 1830 (1984)
The supreme court held that State statutes did not take precedent over
Constitutional law.

MOYA v. US, 761 F2d 322 (7th Cir. 1985) People are entitled to refuse to
provide information to police. Moya went to the supreme court and back.
(held to be valid)

Padelford, Fay a. Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah,
14 Ga. 438 (1854) "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain,
by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The
Constitution, it is true, is a compact [contract], but he is not a party to it.
The States are a party to it .•• "
emphasis added.

 Apostille Procedure What has come to be known as the Apostille is slightly misleading because the Apostille is only the last step of an involved process. The Hague Convention has provided procedures, agreed to by its signatories, for the legalization of documents. For example, if you want to go to France to teach for a year and you want your diploma recognized, you might get an Apostille on it before you go. If you have different licenses and you want them to be recognized as genuine in another country, again, you get an Apostille. What some very bright individual figured out is that the process of legalization is a process of legitimization. The Hague convention recognizes statutory courts, constitutional courts, and even ecclesiastical courts. So what kind of court is a “common law” court? This procedure is formally called “expatriation.” Others prefer to describe it as rebutting a presumption. But in any case, one takes it upon himself to make known that he is a sovereign. This person has discovered an entity, an all capital letter name, a trust with a number, that is being confused with him. The person also has learned of certain allegations of fraud and deceit surrounding this entity vis-à-vis the agency that purportedly created it. So the sovereign offers to give it back to the creator(s) for destruction. This is done by a commercial affidavit called the Cancellatura of Foreign Instruments. It is an involved document that is mailed to the State Secretary of State, as well as the Secretaries of State and Treasury in Washington D.C. These agents are given time to answer the affidavit and send an officer to come and collect all the instruments of collateral held by the sovereign making the offer. This means he is offering back the social security card, driver’s license, credit cards, union cards, commercial and occupational permits and licenses. If you actually get a response from an offer like this, let us know… no one has come calling to collect yet. What many do receive in the mail, after about three months, is a strange letter from the IRS. It addresses the person in their sovereign capacity, acknowledges the affidavit, and says “We don’t think it is in our best interest to argue this.” Such a letter is record of default. The parties are given ten days to respond, during which time the person goes to the common law court and secures a “witnessing” of his stated intent to reaffirm that character and status he has always had since birth… SOVEREIGNTY. The jury signs his paperwork and it is notarized. Then the person takes the papers to a notary public and gets an Actual Notice of Apostille signed and notarized for presentation to the Secretary of State. It is affixed on the top of the documents prepared by the common law court. The 

Secretary, by treaty, has to attach the Apostille to the documents upon request. Once completed, the highest constitutional office in the state has just made legitimate your claim of who and what you truly are. What you do with it from there is your business. Be creative, be wise, but most of all have fun. 

“Three Questions,” approach to functioning in court:

1. The word “law” comes from "llall." The "l" was originally a double-"ll," which came from hieroglyphs signifying "two legs walking." "Law," however, is an obstruction because the "two legs" walking around show that law is constantly changing. In the United States, for example, Americans get to live under approximately 150,000 new laws every year passed by combined federal, state, and municipal legislatures. In 1984 there were over 200,000 such new “laws.” We have been informed by attorneys, as well as West Law, Lexus, and Nexus, etc., that the law changes so rapidly that in many cases an attorney must check to see what the law is today before he goes to court. (My retort each time I was informed of that was, “What if natural law behaved in so unstable a manner?”)
2. A court is a “place where a contract or agreement is made.” A court is a "commercial register.” One consequence of this is that all courts are “courts of record.” Indeed, there is nothing with which a judge can deal except the record. How can a judge act in the absence of paperwork in his possession that inform him what a case is?
3. In accordance with the principle of agreements, if someone fails to respond in protest you in essence have an agreement that includes his stipulation that he is in dishonor.
4. When you are formulating an agreement, the first thing you need is the name of the second party. This is why in court you first ask the judge if you may have his name. Note: the Court is working on an assumption of contract, not an agreement in fact.
Procedure/Dialogue
The Redemption dialogue makes the court proceeding into a deposition that you are conducting for the purpose of establishing on the record who the claimant is in the case. You are there under threat, duress, and coercion, since guaranteed harmful repercussions are inevitable if you do not appear when/as commanded. You are also there because someone, somewhere, has made a claim—or color of claim (implying, or calling what they allege without foundation a “claim”—against you that allegedly justifies enforcing the claim against you by using the legal-violence system. By engaging in this deposition you are actualizing the maxim of law that “the burden of proof resides on him who asserts, not him who denies.” You want them to prove the nature and cause of their alleged or implied claim. In other words, you—as the creditor, owner of the court and both sides of the transaction—are requiring them to “put up or shut up.” When you go into court like this you are exercising your rights under public international law to determine what kind of business these people are trying to do with you.
In any interchange between you and the judge, whether it is you requesting that the judge answer something you are asking him, or him asking you a question, you must persist until the judge sees that you are not going to give in. This is perhaps especially important if/when a judge asks you to state your name, or asks if you are so-and-so. He may ask at least three (3) times, since the system functions in threes. The judge needs to know that you are clear and secure about what you are doing and will not cave in under the psychological pressure that he is so well-trained in applying on those who are before him in court. Likewise, you may have to state your requests three (3) times until you receive either an answer, or a non-answer (which stands as an admission on the record of your position in the matter).
1. The first thing you do is ask the judge for his name so the record is set concerning the parties entering into an agreement. Therefore, when your name is called, you say, "I am here concerning that matter. May I have your name please?” Request number 1.
2. Pay attention to the fact that most Judges/Justices prefer to give their title, NOT THEIR NAME.
3. If the judge gives his name, request: “Would you please spell that for me.”
4. If the judge gives his title (such as “Judge Smith”), request: “Your offer of communication is accepted for value and your dishonor is returned. Please state your name, NOT YOUR TITLE.”
5. If the judges states that it is a TITLE/NAME, you can ask: “Is that TITLE/NAME (such as JUDGE SMITH) the same TITLE/NAME that is registered with the Secretary of State?” If not, it is fraud and the entire matter is void because the judge is doing business as a name (and therefore as a different entity) than that by which is registered as authorized to do business (another derivative).
6. Now if the judge won't give his name, then go ahead with your second request anyway. If someone with whom you are dealing in court fails to respond or is standing mute it means you are in control and he is waving his rights. Request number 2: "Do you have a claim against me?" He will either stand mute or he will decline to answer, signifying his intent to demur to the matter.
7. When you receive a “no” answer, or no response, or a non-responsive response, go on to Request number 3. "Do you know anyone who does have a claim against me?" Note that you do not say any "person" or "anybody that" has a claim. It is anyone "who" has a claim against me, i.e., a living principal who is alive and breathing in the real world. You are not pleading into a fiction or a legislative venue, which is the major legislative premise (presumption) on which the court functions. This presumption stands unless neutralized.
8. If the prosecutor answers you by saying something like “The State of California has a claim against you,” you can say either “Your honor, would you please direct the prosecutor to produce the assessment for the charges,” or, “I call the claimant to the witness stand,” or, “I call the State of California to the witness stand.”
9. Now if you receive a "No" answer or non-responsive reply to your request for the judge to inform you whether he knows anyone who has a claim against you, and the prosecutor also says “no,” then continue by directing the Judge, 1st position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to answer whether there are any more charges.” Asking the judge this cuts down on any more assumed charges. On a good day the prosecutor will refuse to answer and the Judge will dismiss the case on the spot!!!!
10. At this point you can direct the Judge, 2nd position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to answer whether the assessment for the charges is in his/her possession.” Making this request of the judge forecloses the system from acting on the otherwise un-neutralized assumption that you are not concerned whether there is a civil assessment to justify the charges. Without an assessment there can be no charges (see §§ 18 & 19, below). Asking this questions puts the prosecutor in trouble, as if he does not immediately drop the charges he is practicing law without a license, which is a felony!
11. At this point you can direct the Judge, 3rd position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME direct the prosecutor to provide the assessment for the charges along with the certified audit trail of all transactions (held by the mayor of the municipality and the applicable risk management department) including the voucher and all disbursement documents and receipts.”
12. At this point you direct the Judge, 4th position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please direct the prosecutor to provide the serial placement number of his/her bar card.” NOTE: many times the prosecutor is not qualified even to be there (which is often the situation in federal court), and the bar card, which is an OMB number, can be used as the number for a surety bond.
13. At this point you direct the Judge: 5TH position as a request statement: “I request that TITLE/NAME please state for the record if you have subject matter jurisdiction.” NOTE – if there are no further charges, no assessment for the current charges, and no subject matter jurisdiction, the court is in a forfeit position.
14. If you elect to utilize the appearance bond matter within this Redemption approach, this would be the place to bring the matter up [as of this writing requesting an appearance bond may be eclipsed by the single-page Court Bond on court-pleading paper]. Then your 6th position consists of your request for the appearance bond. Making this request in effect puts your name on the account and thereby charges the account so that when the appearance bond is discharged (by appearance) the operators of the account are put into immediate INVOLUNTARY BANKRUPTCY. If there is no assessment for the charges, more than likely they will not issue an appearance bond and you can therefore issue a subrogation surety bond.
15. Should anyone hand you any piece of paper, in particular a paper in which they want you to read the assumed “charges,” scan the front and back of each page and say, “I cannot see any charges.” Hand the paperwork back to the one who gave it to you and then direct/request the Judge to have the prosecutor read the charges.
16. DO NOT LET THEM WAIVE THE READING OF THE CHARGES. Once more repeat the request for the assessment for the charges. Persist on this point. Once that point is resolved, state that you are not disputing any of the facts in the matter and admit to the facts in the charging document. The point is that the system wants you to accept the face appearance of their documents and statements as gospel, so that you self-assess and testify as a witness against yourself. Do not waive the right to require them to provide you with the civil assessment. They never have any valid criminal charges, nor any assessment to support the civil charges (all actions today, both civil and criminal, are actually civil, i.e., commercial). Do not let them off the hook and hang yourself. Require that they substantiate the charges.
17. USE YOUR INTUITION AND WHETHER TO USE next phrase after the gavel fallen (the discharge)! "I request that the order of the court be released to me immediately."
18. This is not a question, it is a request. You do not move the court because doing so is asking for a benefit. By making the request, you are in essence saying, "If there is no firsthand witness or claimant present, on what are you operating? Give me your marching orders." You are demanding to see the order of the court.
19. When you say/ask/request these three things you create a small claims court. A small claims court has different rules and procedures than a commercial admiralty/equity court. In a small claims court there are no Titles of Nobility; attorneys cannot be present.
20. The parties themselves state the claims in small claims court, so we will know who has a claim and who does not.
21. If there are no claims then there is a default to investigate.
22. This Three Questions process also constitutes an inquest hearing on a 'show cause.' You are doing a coroner's inquest or a probate into the matter of any claims against you. In this inquest, only those who have firsthand information concerning the claims may testify.
23. If you are conducting a public inquest into the matter concerning any claims that may be brought against you, and no claims are brought, the matter is concluded, the public inquest is over and you are out of there.
24. Now, there are some variations that can happen with this. The judge or the prosecutor might say, "The State/Province/Department of ______ has a claim against you.” No, they do not. They may have charges (i.e., what they call “charges” but which are actually only a presumption of charges, i.e., color of charges, since there is no assessment), but not a claim. Charges are not claims.
25. Some judges get cute, saying things like, "My name is judge so and so." Well, that's a fiction. That designation does not pertain to a real party, and is not a name that can be entered in the "commercial register." "Judge So and So" is an unregistered fiction, i.e., doing business under an unauthorized and unregistered name.
26. At that stage of the game, you should alter your questions somewhat. 27. "Is there anyone present to press the claim against me in any alleged name other than his own?"
28. If the prosecutor wants to stand up and press that claim (of which there is miniscule chance), then you demand that he be sworn in to testify under oath as to the damages creating and validating the claim concerning which he is testifying. Now you have your inquest.
29. He is not going to swear in24, so you say, "There being no claimants who have sworn in under penalty of perjury today with a firsthand damage claim, it would appear as though there is no more public business concerning me. I am withdrawing." There is no credible witness, and therefore no admissible evidence. No one will swear with responsibility and firsthand knowledge that there is a claim because it does not exist. Even if they have evidence, it is rendered hearsay and presumption for want of any credible witness to substantiate the validity of the evidence. Prosecutors are attorneys, and no attorney is a credible witness who can testify under oath on the witness stand that the evidence he places on the record is valid.
24 Attorney’s statements are arguments, not evidence. That is a double fault, since such behavior is both dishonor and presumption. To be evidence, whatever documents are filed would have to be substantiated as valid and verifiable by testimony under oath. No attorney can do this, i.e., take the witness stand and swear in, because he is not speaking for/as himself, with firsthand knowledge and defined commercial responsibility. He represents, i.e., “re-presents,” by derivative re-invention, what he has been told (hearsay) or thinks would be expedient to say (fiction).
30. Don't allow the Judge to hoodwink you into allegiance.
31. Do not follow the orders of the judge or the judge becomes the head and you become the tail.
32. It is either the judge's private business that's going to go on in there, which is the business of the corporate state, or your private rights under public law.
33. If you traverse into his business you abandon your claim. Don’t traverse, make requests instead. Avoid even the appearance of dishonor. Politely requesting, rather than engaging in behavior that might be interpreted as confrontational, can work wonders.
34. What is an "order"? Public people are acting under the premise of legislative jurisdiction. They MUST have delegation orders that give them authority to do what they are doing. Once you have gone through the first 3 questions: The name, the claim, know anyone who has a claim, if there is no response, then nobody has come forward with a claim against the one asking the questions, i.e., you. In such case there is no cause of action and your adversary has “failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
35. Where would an order of the court come from? The order would have to come from the Secretary of the Treasury, because he is liable for all the books and is the one that appraised the security instrument. So, if they don't have an order going back to the Secretary of the Treasury, they don't have any authority to collect the debt. Remember the universal operating premise on which the legal system functions: Unrebutted presumptions rule.
36. When they issue a citation, complaint, information, or indictment, somebody has already established a commercial value on that instrument. Although there might be a set of papers in the administrative process, like the court documents, we know (and reason, logic, and common sense tell us) that there is a set of commercial (banking) documents and accounts paralleling the legal. Commerce is more fundamental than law. Commerce can function without the legal system, but not vice versa. Law is a subset and derivative of commerce. There is an equivalent commercial world and universe in bookkeeping that parallels and underlies the legal judicial bookkeeping.
37. If an indictment is issued, such as on tax evasion, there must be an appraisal that says that the appraised value of this indictment is $100,000.00.
38. So, in the Treasury, whenever an indictment goes out it claims an asset by way of the security instrument in the sum certain amount of $100,000.00. Then there is a corresponding side to the ledger sheet which is an accounts receivable of $100,000.00 to back up the asset. Is this not DOUBLE ENTRY BOOKKEEPING?
39. If you don't address the commercial aspects of the citation, complaint, information, or indictment, then they have an asset on their books that remains. If it is not adjudicated they have an accounts receivable that is aging.
40. If you dishonor the asset—the indictment—then, their books are out of whack because a dispute exists as to the asset, and the accounts receivable of $100,000.00 that they are looking for remains uncollected.
41. If the prosecutors have no order from the Secretary of the Treasury to collect the alleged debt against the Defendant in the case, they are acting as rogue agents. Obviously the order is an item that one could subpoena the prosecutors to produce by subpoena duces tecum.
42. Remember, you (i.e., your strawman) are there in your "public capacity." Under public international law, private rights are recognized, authorizing you, as the living principal appearing as authorized representative and attorney in fact for your client (your strawman). The real you can be damaged by the proceedings, and, in addition, you have a pre-existing claim against the debtor, the alleged Defendant (your strawman), such as is noticed by your UCC Financing Statements. But as soon as you engage in a co-business venture in their private business (by traversing, dishonoring, or not accepting for value, posting bond, and discharging the charges), you are in their court in a business contract.
43. By requesting that the order of the court be released to you immediately, you are demanding that if you are there on public business involving you, then you want to know who is behind the claim. That request constitutes a public verbal demand for a Bill of Particulars! This removes any assumptions/presumptions around the agreement in question. You are trying to determine the nature and cause of the claim—what it is and who made it.
44. If you receive no response from anyone you are entitled to make the following statement, "It would appear as though I have completed my public business here today. There being no further public business to carry on, I'm withdrawing." Now you're giving your equitable notice to the parties present. You turn and walk out. If anyone tries to stop you, start the Three Question process all over again with him.
45. You don’t care what the judge says, you just go on, and you just go through the routine and direct it at him. Usually they will give their name to start with. Anybody who addresses anything in there is doing so in your court if you have not traversed, not dishonored, and have posted a bond. By bonding the action through your exemption you discharge the charges and end the controversy on the private side, thereby owning the transaction and the court. They are now your employees and, without any reality on the private side to reflect, the public side is left in an untenable position. If, however, you start acknowledging any of their procedures in there, then they are going to assume you are in their court and not yours. They want you to recognize, i.e., make the legal determination concerning the identity of, the accuser, either by body language, testimony, or otherwise so you become a witness against yourself. If you accuse yourself, no one else is required to do so.
Further considerations on all of this are set forth as follows:
1. “Circuit courts” are geared to track the circuitry of the human body or the human mind, which determines, structures, and operates the circuitry through which the current (currency) flows.
2. A direct examination is examining the "conscious mind"; a cross-examination examines the "subconscious mind."
3. Your subconscious mind is totally innocent of everything. It believes everything your conscious mind tells it. That is why people have to stay in "good standing" with their own consciences. What they are trying to get you to do is to alter the agreement between your "conscious" mind and your “subconscious" mind. When that happens, your immune system breaks down. You must be totally honest to keep your immune system together.
4. When we press them for this kind of testimony concerning their affairs they back away. We continue to the point that they must compromise their conscience when we bring the fact of the matter to them.
5. The “law” knows only two types of persons; “employees” and “employers” as identified by the “Tax Identification Number (S.I.N./S.S.N.).
6. The “employer” is the Preferred Stockholder, while the “employee” is the Common Stockholder, of the “Corporate Government” (bankrupt US Inc.).
7. The Preferred Stockholder has this position via the “Birth Certificate.”
8. The Preferred Stockholder holds both the “debit” and the “credit” side of the account.
9. A "traffic ticket," for instance, represents "common stock."
10. What the Judge is doing here is attempting to get you to agree with the operational assumptions, such as agreeing to be the collateral on whatever the charge is, i.e. Ticket, Non-Filing, etc., thereby stipulating that the charge is valid.
11. When you tender currency, which is the "public exchange," you do not pay any debt. You cannot reduce a negative (public charge) with another negative (public money).
12. If you are faced with a fine involving a serious criminal charge, and you pay with "public money," it is a bribe.
13. When you request that the court release the order to you, what you are asking them to give you the "common stock." Release the stock ("order of the court") to me immediately.
14. The "order" represents the One World Order, for one thing. It is also a "money order," or possibly a "work order."
15. Whoever has presented the “charge(s)” is the one with the “claim”; the one with the claim is the payee.
16. When you accept the account for value, they must bring the amount into existence from your private account, at which point they have a "tax obligation" on their hands.
17. When you accept the property for value, they are the payees because they are in possession. We're saying, "I accept that claim," because they are holding a "lien" on the "claim," and they have it in their possession, so they are the payees in fact. The payee in fact has to answer to the Internal Revenue for the funds.
18. Accepting a charging instrument for value means that you accept the claim. I accept the claim, and I am the taxpayer in fact, because I allow them to pass through "my account" to discharge the charges.
19. They have to release the order of the court to you. They have to release the "claim," i.e., the money, the account. The account, however, is already prepaid, because you are the principle. They obtained the money from you in the first place, since where that is where all the currency in circulation today derives from. You already paid the claim, and you are asking them to release the claim that you have already paid.
20. So what you do is interrogate the witness. You ask the three magic questions and don’t go beyond that.
21. When you are interrogating a judge you don’t care what he says because anything he says can and will be used against him. He is testifying, not you! That is the essence of taking testimony because when you enter it into their courts the situation inverts. The Miranda warning says “anything you say can and will be used against you.” It does not say “might.”
The jurisdiction of courts today is international. All commerce occurs in international admiralty/maritime. That means that you and I, as the owners of the account, do not do any of the work. We are the sovereigns, so our employees (public officials) do the work. When there is a credit and a debit, we have two employees involved: one state and one federal. These employees handle the matching funds.