PIRATES ON THE SEA OF ASPHALT



Property is filed by ‘deed’ in county offices - see UCC 9-302 & 9-103: Not required to file a financial statement, but still have lien-hold capacity. Therein, “When any property is registered on the public side, pursuant to legislative statute or treaty there is no requirement to file a financial statement.”  The financial statement is the UCC-1.
To look at it backwards, if you file or register any property in a public records system (created by statute or treaty) you are filing a financial statement and giving a priority claim, or interest,  to the STATE - on that property!  (We won’t call it a financial statement or a UCC-1!). What do you register pursuant to a legislative enactment? How about a birth certificate, or your automobile, or a marriage license, or a business license, deeds, etc.?
You are the PLEDGOR and the STATE  is the PLEDGEE! State has the priority interest/claim.  The State is the CREDITOR -  and you are the DEBTOR!
Via UCC-9-302, legal requirement to register is by treaty (International Law) i.e. for debts!  Indicia [evidence] is the ‘Certificate’ is issued to the party doing the registration.  Regarding an automobile - don’t you get a ‘Certificate of Title’ when you register it?  What is that ‘Certificate’?  Is it in the nature of a “pawn broker receipt for the ‘pledge’?  That’s what you’re looking at on the ‘Certificate of Title’....same thing.  How do you redeem the pawn?  Pay the debt, but also take the pawn ticket back.  Who can redeem the pawn? The Holder (in due course).  The DMV/State is doing something very similar.  The State/DMV is soliciting a pledge which creates a CREDITOR/DEBTOR relationship.  They issue a Certificate to the DEBTOR, which is the redemption certificate.  The STATE has the priority lien on the entity, also known as “legal title” - until it is redeemed.  So the State, having the priority claim, can lien it, tax it, hypothecate it, control it, legislate over it-----anything they want!
          UCC 9-103 is about lienholder interest between 2 or more STATES.  The property is registered  in one state and the property is in another. “THIS” State = De Facto;  “THE” State = De Jure.
Which STATE has jurisdiction in the lienhold?  “If the property has been removed from “this” state, for a period longer that 4 months, then “this” state no longer has a lienhold over the property.” [the car!]  “Notwithstanding, it has no jurisdiction at the event of the cancellation of the certificate.”
There appears to be 2 methodologies of getting the property and lienhold interest out of “this” state:
1) Has it been removed from “this” state for a period linger than four months?
2) Has there been a “cancellation” of the certificate?
          Note:  Ohio statutes state that one cannot be charged with driving without a license if it has been expired for 4 months or more!  A license is a certificate to drive.
Regarding Oregon:  If your license is about to expire, the State sends you a Notice
that your license is about to expire.  If you do not go down and renew your license, the State presumes by your failure of response to their letter or renewal, that you’ve given a counter offer of silence, which the State accepts to retain control over the contractual rights of the property between you.  Remember, in Contract Law, the acceptor is the head and the offer is the tail.  So the State offers you the Notice of the Renewal of the license--you can either cancel it or renew it.  Most people ignore and never respond, or simply renew.
When they ignore it (silence), it’s like a default which is a counter offer which the State accepts, retaining jurisdiction over the agreement.  Once the State presumes to accept your silence, then the State is in control of the relationship with respect to the Driving privilege, and they place the license on their books in a condition of “suspension.”
Therefore, when their officers catch you out on the highway, they charge you under a suspended license.
Let’s say you’re charged with driving on a suspended license.  If you came in and could give notice that you have removed the property, i.e. the contract, from ‘this’ State and it’s been longer than four months, they have NO jurisdiction.  And even if they attempted to renew the contract, if you give them notice of the removal of the property (car) from ‘this’ State into ‘the’ State and it’s been longer than 4 months, they certainly have no control over the contact, pursuant to 9-103!
          But the other methodology is a swifter death!  Cancel the Certificate.  Because under 9-103, under no event shall they have jurisdiction or Rights to the property beyond the period of time of the cancellation of the license. So, how do we cancel the license?
Well, that starts to get interesting.  When you offered the registration of the automobile to the DMV, what you have basically done is gone by way of legislative enactment and pledged the property as the PLEDGOR to the State, the PLEDGEE, who now, under 9-302 has had a priority interest in the property claimed by it pursuant to that statute under the presumption that you intended to pledge it!  So they have legal title and they issue you, the pledgor, the certificate and the receipt of that pledge.
Now that you have turned over the legal title to the property to the State, it, with the priority interest, is the Creditor.  It’s State property and every year they require you to re-license the property for the USE - privilege of the State property.  So the yearly licensing and license plated - the license plates are the receipt for the tax paid, and the tax is on the use of the State vehicle, which you gave to the State.  It’s not your property...N0 More!
          Once you have reclaimed title to the property, you have no requirement to pay a tax on it every year because you have the priority claim...NOT the State!
But now what happens when you want to get rid of the old car, sell it to someone else and get a new one?  You’ve been doing exactly what you need all along, but you didn’t understand it, and it wasn’t you that was doing it.  It was passed off to a third party so you wouldn’t have a clue what was happening here. What they ended up doing was the following; When you want to get rid of the automobile - what you do is sign the back of the Certificate of Title, put the date down in front of a Notary, and put the value of the transaction on the document (how much money you’re selling it for).
     Haven’t you just done the following; Done an Acceptance for Value of the Certificate of Title?  Think about it.  You signed it! You dated it! You put the amount of value of the contract on there!  Isn’t that an Acceptance for Value?
What you have just done then, when you lay that back on the registering clerk, is you’ve given notice that you’ve taken back the pledge.  In other words, you’ve given the clerk Notice to Cancel the lien - cancel the certificate!
          Now the problem is, you never signed it, and took to down and laid it on the DMV counter and said “Cancel this certificate!”
          What you did is: you went beyond that and you put the name of the successive owner on there and his address.  And then you gave the damn instrument to him!  That idiot went down to the DMV and he laid ‘your’ certificate on the counter to get them to cancel their lien hold against you to clear the lien so that it could be transferred to him!
          Now, once they place that document on the counter, they probably went to the computer and cleared out your registration, which is a cancellation of the certificate.  But then they got him to sign that document or a new document applying for a new public registration.  And when he put that on them, they refiled a registration on the same property on him and now pursuant to 9-302 the State is the priority lien holder under the new pledge.
          Now if they had split this process up so that, before you could sell it to JOE JONES, the next guy, they had to tell you, well you’d go down to the State and get it removed from the State so you’ve got title.
          Everybody would sit back and say “What the hell ya’ talking about – it’s my property!  What do I have to get removed?”
          So, rather than you going down and laying the ‘Acceptance for Value’ on the clerk, they got you to give the document to the successor and he went down and laid your ‘Acceptance for Value’ on the clerk in his behalf so you don’t understand (or know) what’s going on!  See what they did to you?
Now, if you’ve done the ‘Acceptance for Value’ of your Birth Certificate, the certificate is the receipt for the pledge of the property.  And when you sign your name and the date on it and you lay it back on the office and say CANCEL the ‘certificate’ - who’s got the priority lien on the property on it?  Well, whoever is the next party to register!  See, this is the problem, remember, we’re in an Admiralty, War-time Economy.  There is no land, there is no soil, there is no common law!
          Remember “Water World”, the great movie, with Kevin Costner?  It is telling you that it is rumored that there is land!  But there’s nobody we know that has found it, and landed on it.  Everybody is sailing on vessels on the sea of commerce.  Therefore, there is no common law.  All there is, is the commercial law of the Admiralty between foreign entities.  Now the problem is, is when you’re operating on the high seas, if you are operating in a vessel that is not registered under a flag (license plate), you are presumed to be what?   A PIRATE!
Under the law of Nations, any of the nations (states), by privateers can seize the property (car) as a prize, tow it into port (impound), and let the authorities determine the states of the property since there’s no registration and/or flag!  That’s what’s been happening to all of us, we’ve all been seized and towed into port on the presumption that we’re all operating as pirates.
          And you can’t say there’s a common law right.  There isn’t any. The soil doesn’t exist (common law on the land) in their emergency military venue!
          So therefore, all the property must have a registration.  If it’s not registered, it’s bootlegged property, subject to seizure. [Consider; Public (DMV/Gov’t) Registration or Private (UCC) Registration!]
          The problem is, if you register it on the public side you’ve given the priority lien pursuant to 9-302 to the public!  But you can register it on the private side...the UCC!  And if you register it on the private side, then it’s registered and the military is given due process notice that the property is private!  Which is outside the scope of the military, i.e., the public (government), for it’s use!  So the key is that when you cancel the priority lien of the state on the public registration side, you’d better immediately go down and register a priority UCC 1 or 3 on the private side to the Straw-man [Trade-name]!
          And the finance statement is basically the Bill of Sale!  And the Bill of Sale can be between your strawman (the debtor) and yourself (the creditor).  Now, understand the difference between the debtor and creditor.  The debtor is really the human body and creditor is really your soul!   And there are two separate entities there, because remember the Lord said that if you follow his laws, your soul would be raised in the resurrection and go on to eternity. But your human body is a body of sin and it’s a non-perfected body.  It’s not a permanent entity, it was built of the earth and it will decay back into the earth.  So it’s a temporary temple.  So the body is the debtor--the man of sin.  And the soul is the redeemed character under God, and the soul is the creditor if he’s in control of the body, which the Lord placed him here to be, and not surrendered up to another master, particularly Satan (adversary), and the master of this world.  But everything you do in terms of commerce in their world, is only here for the time your body exists in the world, so the commerce is done through the debtor - the Straw-man [Trade-name].
          So you have two separate entities there, and your body, the vessel, is really the transmitting conduit [utility] between anything of this world and whatever is to the benefit to maintain and keep the soul alive in the temporary structure, the vessel, for that period of time on earth here.
          Now what we have done in terms of redeeming the body so that the soul indeed now has a vessel in which to operate under freedom and liberty is really to take the title of the body (the birth certificate), which is the pawn slip, and we redeemed it by the acceptance for value and put it back on them, just like you redeemed the lien hold interest on the vehicle, by signing it, dating it, and putting a value on it and laying it back on the registration clerk (UCC-3)!
          Now, let’s go to land because that’s similar, but a little different.  There’s money involved just like on the vehicle and everything else.  Money is whatever you use.  And it doesn’t have to be gold and silver, it’s immaterial and irrelevant.  It can be anything.  That’s why the gold clause of 1933 - it really didn’t change anything except get people totally off point.  See, the only reason that they said gold and silver is substance of money of account, certainly it has the substance built into it.  However, you’ve got substantive rights in paper currency to the merchandise  represented.  If you don’t own the title to the merchandise it’s immaterial whether it’s gold, silver, or paper, wampum beads, or anything else.
For instance, if a slave goes down and thinks he has the right to sell the master’s horse and buggy and the slave gets gold for the sale of the horse and buggy for which the master did not approve, could the slave argue that because he got paid in gold and silver, that’s substance and the property is his?  No, ‘cause he didn’t have title in the thing sold for which he acquired the title in which supposedly was substance!  It’s not the medium, it’s the TITLE to the transaction that carries the substance or mere form with it.
          If you are a sovereign being and you’re over in France and your kingdom was not of France, and you sold something and you got some French money for it, does that mean that the French money isn’t yours, or doesn’t express a substance or a title?  All it is, is a medium of exchange!
          If the sovereign owned the title in the thing sold, then the money, no matter what the hell it is, represents the substance of the transaction to which he is entitled.  And if it’s mere pieces of paper, he can go out and exchange those foreign pieces of paper through some kind of exchange system, alternately get gold, silver, or any other property and he owns title to whatever he got!  Because it’s merely some kind of continuing transaction, on a quid-pro-quo, that the first item that he gave up that he had substance of title in, therefore whatever represents that transaction in terms of “money” was merely a representation of the substance that he had from the beginning that he moved to the end medium.  It’s a different form!
          But if you have no title to that which you sold in the transaction to begin with, how can you acquire more title than that which you had by placing it in a medium which presumably has more substance to it than what you were entitled to?  See, we’ve been totally drawn off point.  It’s in the title to the transaction or the contract.  Not in the medium by which the exchange takes place over a series of events!
          Let’s get back on point to the soil and land.  When you go in to buy property, usually you acquire the property from the previous owner, who sells you the land and he sells it to you by way of which usually referred to as a “warranty deed.”  The Warranty Deed is an elaborate ‘Bill of Sale’ in which amongst other things, the previous owner guarantees to the buyer that he’s going to get good and complete title with only the exceptions as “listed hereon.”
          Now, you and I know that when he went down to the County Recorder and had that previous deed that went to him registered, that pursuant to a statute and a treaty, that now the County Recorder has a priority lien on the property under 9-302, which is the equivalent of a UCC-1 priority lien, by the new owner of the property who is deemed to be the pledgor of the property, the pledgee being the County and the ‘holder in due course!’
          When that deed got registered, ultimately the piece of paper was going to find its way to the new owner of the property.
          Now, what value is that piece of property deed that came back to the owner - what could he do or not do with it?  For instance, let’s ask the question, let’s say he lost it or his dog ate it up.  Has that owner lost anything because of the loss of that piece of paper?  NO!  Why?  ‘Cause he doesn’t need that piece of paper!  Why doesn’t he need it?  Because the County Recorder is the holder in due course and if he wants another copy of that piece of paper he can go the County Recorder and every day of the week and every hour, and for a price the County Recorder will give him a certified copy of that document all day long. That deed that comes back is a ‘Certificate of Deed’ - like a certificate of Title!
          Now look at what happens.  Let’s say somebody ‘stole’ that deed out of his safe.  What could anybody do with that deed that they stole out of his safe?  Nothing!  Why?  Because the certificate is in the name of the guy on the land!  The certificate is not in the name of the thief.  Therefore, the holder in due course, the state, won’t recognize them!  The state only recognizes the certificate holder.  Just like the pawn broker only recognizes the pawn ticket holder (all are in DEBTOR ‘CAPS’).  Now you understand why all the capitalization on all of those documents are capitalizations, because under 9-302 they’re the debtor in the pledge! 
          Now, since only the debtor has first rights of redemption, he’s the only one for which the certificate has any value, unless he dies and then he’s gotta’ go through a probate court to get a successor recognized by the State, to come in and cancel the lien!
          Let’s watch what happens with the land if a guy wants to sell the land to somebody else now.  It’s kind of like the automobile deal, but a little different.  See, if they had you turn over the deed that they sent you back, and endorse it and send it in to cancel the lien, they’d probably start letting the cat out of the bag as it applies to land.  So what they do is, you fill out a brand new warranty deed which is approved by all the States and the warranty deed now assigns all your rights, title and interest which also includes the right of redemption, doesn’t it (?) to the successor party.  And you convey that deed, signed under a notary, to the new buyer.  But in that warranty deed as the seller, you have promised as part of your conveyance, that you’d release the lien hold interest upon the property.  You never did that but you gave the buyer the opportunity to.  Because the buyer or his agent takes the new warranty deed down to the County Recorder for his purpose of getting it registered, ‘cause he’s as stupid as the rest of us!
          Now, when he goes down there (some people never do it because it’s encumbered by a mortgage and the banks would never let them do it.  They’d have to go through a professional agent, so the agents do it and the people don’t have a clue what’s going on!)  Here’s what happens:  most people just think you take your deed down and record it - you can’t do that.  They break it down to at least 3 steps!  If you go down there with a deed and go to the County Recorder and say, “Hey, I want this recorded,” they’ll take one look at it and say, “No, we can’t record it, you go over to the transfer department first, and when you’re done there, they’re going to send you up to the treasurer and after you’re done there, come on down, and we’ll record it!  Three Step Process.  Now the first thing they have you do, is they have you go to the “Transfer Department” (well defined name).  When you show up there they take a look at your deed and the first thing they do is they look at who is the grantor (what is the name of the grantor), and they go to their records and they double check that the grantor on the deed is in fact the currently registered owner of the property.  What are they checking? 
They’re checking to see who has the power of redemption.  Because if the grantor on your deed is not in their records, he’s not got the power of redemption, does he?  And they can’t register your property under your name until they release the lien under the old pledgor’s name.  See, their goal is first, they must release the first pledge!  They’ve got a duty to, because since they’re going to operate with this warranty deed, they don’t want to get the previous owner in trouble so that he’s going to come back and sue the county when the county doesn’t release the lien against him!  So that you’ve got a clear property before you are grantor to convey the same right back to the county with your filing!  Now they gotta’ go to the records and check to make sure the grantor is the right party and they also gotta’ make sure that there’s no registered liens against the grantor before the state releases its lien.  Because if there are other parties, like the IRS and banks and everybody else with a lien against that property, the state wants to maintain the priority lien to protect all these other corporate interests. 
And it’ll never release it until you dispose of those other liens.  Understand how it happens!  Once the file department sees that no other liens are on the property, the grantor is the correct party who signed it, and it was notarized so that they can believe it was the grantor, then what happens is, because the file clerk at the ‘Transfer Department’ notices that there is a signature of the previous grantor (previous certificate holder) on the warranty deed---doesn’t the file transfer clerk notice that the previous certificate holder has endorsed the legal description of the property, signed it, which is an acceptance for value, and then what does the file transfer clerk do?  Make note that we’ve just cancelled the security lien hold interest against the previous owner of the property.  And he takes the brand new deed and he stamps “transferred” on it!  Now that file transfer clerk says, “Go over there to the Treasurer.”  Why are you going over to the treasurer?  Because when you get to the treasurer they’re going to slip you a piece of paper and they want you to fill out the piece of paper.  And the piece of paper is gonna’ be your ‘agreement’ that you’re the new owner and that the property actually sold for $______. Now, what happens when you put down the amount of money for an item and sign your name to it?   What is that called?  What kind of a document is it?  It’s a Finance Statement!  What is a Finance Statement?  It’s basically what you do with a bank when you’re going to get a loan, isn’t it?  And when you fill out the form to apply for the loan, aren’t you giving the bank a finance statement, which is a UCC-3? Who in the hell’s got the priority lienhold interest?
          Okay, so you go over to the treasurer of the County and they request that you fill out the exact amount of funds for which you are paying them...boy, you’d better be right, because you’re signing ‘under penalty of perjury’ and they’re going to come back and throw you in jail if you’re wrong!  So you’re so scared you put down the right money (amount) and give it to them!  What you don’t understand is why the hell did you have to give them anything???  By giving them the finance statement, they’re the holder in due course!  Then they charge you a tax based on the amount of the transfer...because that is a customs tax.  All income taxes are customs taxes.  And they’re putting a tax on the value of the property, which is leaving the ‘defacto bifurcation’, going to you, leaving ‘this’ state, going to ‘the’ state.  So all these sales taxes are customs export taxes, from one ‘state’ to another!
          Now, where the hell in the dejure Constitution of the united States does any of our governments ever allowed to tax exports?
Now that they want an export tax and you don’t protest, they charge you the tax and give you a receipt and stamp the deed again!  Then they say you can go down and register it!  Well, by golly, by then you’d better register it because they’re the holder in due course and they want to hold it anyway!
          Now, let’s look at the remedy.  Let’s say you went through all this stupid process to begin with and now you’re sitting there with a registered deed.  Theoretically, how do you get rid of the priority lien?  Well, what you gotta’ do is cancel the certificate!  There’s several methodologies quite possibly to cancel the certificate.  One would be to take the certified copy of the land deed and accept it for value with the contract overlay, date it, and serve it back on the County Recorder, the transfer clerk!  Have them cancel the certificate.  Just like you did with the birth certificate!  Lay it back on the Clerk of the County, because that’s where they registered the damn thing!
          What if the County refuses to accept it?  Understand the following, you did the acceptance of the certificate!  And you laid the acceptance back on them!  What do you mean they’re not going to accept your acceptance?  They are the offerors, they don’t have the opportunity to decline your acceptance!  You’re in control!  The one who accepts the offer is in control!  By placing an acceptance for value on the certificate, you’re the acceptor!  They’re the acceptee!
          Now, if they don’t want to pick it up from their counter, that’s their problem, you cannot force them to pick it up off their counter.  All you can do is what you’re legally required to do--accept it-- and place the notice back in their hands.  And when you place the acceptance on their counter, do not pick it back up and walk away with it!  Now your going to notify not only one party but probably a whole slew of parties, so nobody can get brain lockjaw and say “I never got it.”
          See, you can send it to them by certified or registered mail, or just go in with a couple of witnesses and you also give notice by sending proof of service and certified mail to a whole slew of other people, which I guarantee if I ever do this process, I’m gonna’ do.  You’re not only going to want to lay it upon the proper parties’ office in the county, and we’re not sure who that is yet, so you want to send copies by certified mail to a number of parties in the county, in the State, in the U.S.  You’re going to definitely lay it upon the file transfer agent, the County Recorder, the County Treasurer, the Prosecutor, County Counsel, Secretary of State, Attorney General’s office, State Treasurer.  You’re gonna lay it on the Secretary of the Treasury (DC), and maybe the US Attorney General!
          Now, see, eventually when you do this, you’re canceling the certificate, aren’t you?  The next thing you do is register that ‘thing’ post haste on the private side.  You put the legal description on your UCC-3, and you register that with your Secretary of State.  Then you may even want to give notice to the Clerk of the Common Pleas Court (superior court, district court, etc.) in your County, that the property is now private.  And now that you accepted it for value, and you ask the county to adjust all the records and stuff, if you don’t get an adjustment and removals from whatever, that’s when you’re going to do the chargeback on up to Lawrence Summers, and have Summers adjust the account through the IRS and the public side!
          Look at the process, look at this theory, look at 9-103, look at what your mind tells you (logic) on what you understand and it looks reasonable.  Look at the ‘deed’ process.  What they’re going through, that it was the signature of the previous ‘donor’ or the previous pawnee or pledgor that gets the release of the lien from the state to clear the property to come to you so that you can pledge it back again!  It’s the ONLY thing that makes sense!  Otherwise, there’d be violations of pledges, covenants, everything up and down the line. 
          Now, look at the following thing:  Now you’re clearing a State interest in the land.  Do the Feds have an interest in the land?  You’d better believe it!  What document did the Feds issue with regard to that land?  Way, way back, didn’t the land get deeded through the Feds by way of Treaty (land patent)?  What is the land patent called?  A certificate!  Land Patent Certificate!  In essence, the Feds did not grant it true (absolute ownership).  What happens if you lost your land patent certificate?  You can get a new one!  So who’s the ‘Title Holder?’  The Feds!  If they can issue a new certificate, they’re ultimately the Title Holder!!  So, what do you gotta do?  Call the TITLE BUSTERS!!!  You’ve got to cancel the certificate as it applies to your share of the land!  How do you do that?  Get a certified copy of the land patent certificate, describe the subset portion, and accept it for value and lay it back on the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) office, to cancel that portion of the certificate of the ownership title of the land as it applies to your land.
          I don’t know if one has to cancel an interest beyond that by the ‘Crown,’ I don’t know if we have to cancel an interest beyond that by the Vatican!  For instance, if the Crown of England by way of the Treaty of Peace, granted the titles of the land to the Congress and the United States, do we have to accept that Treaty of Peace for value, to the King as it applies to ‘our’ land?  And with the Crown of England’s agreement with the Pope, to be a subset of the Papacy, do we have to accept that document for value as it applies to the subset to our claim to the Vatican to clear its interest?
          Doesn’t 9-102 and 9-302 start laying out the pattern of what these thieves and crooks have been up to?  They (since this goes back to the Edomites, [government]) just assume and presume that since you just gave up all your rights, privately to the public side, you intended it to be a ‘no’ nation! 
          See, ultimately the problem comes back on us because we are ignorant of the law and didn’t understand no different, cause we did not read the scripture and we did not understand what we were told!  And that’s partially the fault of the ‘corporate’ church, which doesn’t learn, understand, or teach the law. WHY? Because they’re....False Prophets!  And therefore you believe the false prophets and therefore you fail [fall into the pit!]
          

"NATIONAL CURRENCY"

Did you know that from 1863 to 1929, USA was issuing NATIONAL CURRENCY? I.e. paper money of the republic which were backed by silver and gold, as they REALLY were redeemable in those coins on demand.
There were 14,000 PRIVATE banks that were CHARTERED by USA to issue that money. These banknotes had "NATIONAL CURRENCY" printed on them, and were backed by GOLD and issued by local AMERICAN banks. Those put up bonds with the US Treasury, and then could issue/print 90% of the worth of those bonds.
The red/blue number is the charter number of that bank. This currency was backed by deposits of bonds and gold notes with the Treasury.

That way, the banknotes were backed by assets of those American banks (which of course came from the American people). And if the bank failed to redeem those banknotes on demand in gold or silver, then the US Treasury would redeem them and take over that particular bank due to nonpayment of its obligations.

These were authorized by Act of June 3, 1864

Interestingly, Federal Reserve was ONE of those banks. So it wasn't until 1933 when all these bank charters were abolished, and were replaced with a SINGLE charter to the Federal Reserve.
BUT, that single charter was NOT for issuing NATIONAL (USA) currency, it was for issuing an INTERNAL (US) currency of the federal gov't.
So in 1933, they replaced 14,000 NATIONAL banks with a single FEDERAL Reserve System, which would then issue PRIVATE currency which is backed by NOTHING of real value.
So your 'money' today (FRNs) is NOT a NATIONAL currency, just a private scrip of the United States corporation. Not much different from CHIPS in a CASINO.







In other words, if it DOESN'T say "NATIONAL CURRENCY" on the bank note, it is NOT a national currency!
And that’s how thousands of NATIONAL banks (who dealt in HONEST money backed by gold), were replaced by a single FEDERAL Central bank system (who deals in FIAT money, backed by NOTHING).
Also, in addition to all these private bank-issued bank notes, there were UNITED STATES NOTES (red seal) issued directly by the US Treasury, but those seem to be rather rare from before 1928, so until that time, the PRIVATE-BANK issued NATIONAL CURRENCY, seems to have been the MOST USED paper currency in America.
So until 1933, money was put into circulation by thousands of LOCAL banks owned by private businessmen, rather than by one CENTRAL BANK owned by a handful of rich banksters. I.e. running a bank back then, was a business as any other, and ANYONE with a little capital could start one.
And these LOCAL banks dealt in REAL MONEY (banknotes backed by gold), while the current Central Bank (FedRes) deals in green paper that’s NOT backed by gold or anything of value.
http://coinsite.com/national-currency/
**************
It’s kinda like being an attorney. Back in the days of the Republic, ANYONE with some knowledge of the law, could be a lawyer (no license required), while today it’s a PRIVILEGED occupation which requires a BAR card.
So America was taken over by special interests, where we must jump through the gov’t hoops, in the country that we the People own.
**********************
Here's what Wikipedia says:
"The National Banking Acts of 1863 and 1864 were two United States federal banking acts that established a system of national banks for banks, and created the United States National Banking System. They encouraged development of a national currency backed by bank holdings of U.S. Treasury securities and established the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency as part of the United States Department of the Treasury and authorized the Comptroller to examine and regulate nationally chartered banks. The Act shaped today's national banking system and its support of a uniform U.S. banking policy."
And US Code:
12 U.S. Code § 38 - The National Bank Act
(Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.))

The Act entitled “An Act to provide a national currency secured by a pledge of United States bonds, and to provide for the circulation and redemption thereof,” approved June 3, 1864, shall be known as “The National Bank Act.”

(June 20, 1874, ch. 343, §?1, 18 Stat. 123.)

Winning in court.


All these courts are privately owned trading companies. The united States district courts are all owned...those are your article one courts. They're all owned by the united States attorney's executive offices out of Washington DC which is a privately owned corporation. They're article one legislative tribunals. They're not courts. They have a DUNS number, they have a pit code, sip code, NAICS number (North America Identification Security Classification). You have to have that number in order to trade internationally. All these courts are registered with the DOD, Department of Defense. They have a DUNS number which is Data Universal Numbering System. That's a Dun & Bradstreet. You have to be registered with CCR, Contractors Central registration under the DOD. They have another department called the DLIS, Defense Logistics Information Service. The DLIS issues a case code that's spelled CAGE, Commercial And Government Entity which corresponds to the bank account. They have a bank account. They take everything that you file into the court and they securitize it. And these banks [ ] and all these banks are registered, they have a depository agreement, a security agreement and an escrow agreement. And most of them are registered with the Federal Reserve bank of New York city. And they use what they call...North Carolina uses a circular 16, they use as their depository agreement. They take public funds and they deposit them under a...its called a depository resolution agreement. And they have a security agreement which the clerk of the courts signs with the bank. And they have an escrow agent that acts as the go-between the federal reserve bank that they have the account with...so all these courts are taking your money and funneling it into an escrow account. Most of them are in New York. There's 60 trillion dollars of your money in the federal reserve bank of New York city. And they've told the courts not to rule against the banks on these foreclosure cases. They're all in bed together. And what these lawyers are doing is acting as private debt collectors. And under the Debt Collectors Practices Act, its called the FDCPA and its title 15 section 1692. In order to be...when you're a public debt collector you have to be registered with the government, and you have to have a license and you have to have a bond in order to collect debt. Well these attorneys are what you call private debt collectors and they don't have a...the attorneys are exempted by the BAR association on that provision, but their firm is not. The firm they work for has to be registered and they have to have a license and a bond and they don't. And all these court cases that you're involved in, these attorneys are acting as private debt collectors. And what they're doing is collecting money from you as private debt collectors and they're not licensed or bonded to do that. And they do this through what they call Warrant of Attorney. Black's law dictionary of 1856 defines what a warrant of an attorney is. Its like a writ of execution. Its like a put or a call. When you do a marching call that means they use it to buy equity securities. Cause they securitize everything that you file into court which means they turn it into a negotiable instrument. Then they sell it as a commercial item. They call them distressed debt, these debt collectors, that what Unifund is, they come in and buy up all these court judgments as distressed debt. Then they put them into hedge funds and they sell them to investors globally. And of course when you get into selling debt instruments you're creating a security risk. Anytime you get into risk management you have to have re-insurance. That's where Luer Hermes comes in. They're an underwriting company. And they're a sub division of Alliance SE out of Munich Germany. And they're the US agency that acts as a bond holder for Alliance SE is PIMCO bonds who takes all your securities, they pool them, and that's what they do on these mortgage loans, go to their web site and it'll tell you that's what they do. All of your mortgage loans are securities. The notes have a maturity of more than 9 months so they're a security by definition. If you go to title 15 section 77 A b 1 it tells you that any note with a maturity of more than 9 months is a security by legal definition and an investment contract. So when you sign and indorse these notes as the drawer and the maker you're in an investment contract. And you gave them a security. They take the security and they securitize it. As soon as they securitize it and indorse it for payment, they've securitized it. The loan is no longer secured. They've collapsed the trust and there's no corpus in the trust under probate law. And what they do is sell it as a mortgage backed security. Well PIMCO takes the mortgage backed security pools over and sells them as bonds. So bonds actually come from pooled securities. And they sell these on the TBA market globally. And all these courts are involved in that. And the only time you can stop them is when you make them liable and that's what I've been doing. I do a letter rogatory which is a letter of instruction under the Hague convention. And its under title 18 section 1781 and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure I believe its 28 B. And you tell them what you want them to do. You make a contract with them. When you go into these courts you contract with them. And they run the court room.

SAMPLE AFFIDAVIT SENT TO THIRD PARTIES (is a personal, in use, HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL affidavit, which is communicated as information only, for the main purpose of its registration in the public archive)


 


STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL


All rights reserved UCC 1-308/1-207


A notice to the dealers is a notice

to the authorities. A notice to the authorities is a notice

to the dealers.


Applications to all successors and assigns.

All are without justification.


 


 


From:


:------ of the family : --------- ©™ , sui juris


Directorate (in full) – Prefecture [P.C.] – Greece


Contact E-mail :



To:


The Commander of the Traffic Police Department --------


E-mail :




In response to your timely email letter, the -------- -- /--/20--, and honoring your written information, I note The following:



1on- You refer to my "objection" while it is a fully justified return of the contract offered by you as INVALID and without the possibility of execution, all legally drawn up and filed, with the full explanatory copy attached, to the said return.


2on- As an "answer" and based on the principles and laws governing Contract Law, informing you is imperfect, because it does not prove your claim (I don't understand any evidence) of the existence of presumption and the need to impose a fine.


3on- Regarding the filing of the "objection" the appointed official, in his omissions, did not give me the stamped/registered copy of it as it should and please like me will be sent as an attachment upon return of this document.


 


 


NOTICE AND WARNING TO THE POLICE OFFICERS OF THE TRAFFIC POLICE DIRECTORATE ----------------


**Notification to the Commander of the Traffic Police Department ----------- and to each person involved.


 



RESPONSIBLE STATEMENT ON THE RESERVATION OF RIGHTS




UCC § 1-308(a): The party who with express reservation performs or promises to be executed or consents to execution in a way that demands or offers the other party does not infringe the rights in this way that were reserved. Phrases such as "unbiased," "in protest," or similar ones are enough.


Maintain all my rights and freedoms at all times and in all Nunc pro tunc (now for then) from the moment of my birth and forever. Further, I reserve my rights not to I am compelled to perform any contract or commercial agreement which I did not conclude knowingly, voluntarily and deliberately. And moreover, I do not accept the responsibility of the forced providing any non-disclosure contract or commercial agreement. Not I am never subject to tacit contracts, and I have never knowingly or intentionally contract for the assignment of my sovereignty.





RESPONSIBLE DECLARATION/AFFIDAVIT, UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY


 


Jury, ___________ :family :_____________©, sui juris, natural person, sovereign in my place of residence, (and/or elsewhere) in its actual capacity as a Republic and as one of the various municipal regions that were created by the Constitution. As an ordinary person of the sovereign people, I swear and certify that the the undersigned wrote and read the following facts which, according to the the best possible knowledge and belief of the depositor, is true, correct, complete and not misleading, the truth, the whole truth and only the truth.


 


Will accept the terms of your offer IF you prove to me that there is a contract to which I agree to its terms. OTHERWISE, YOU DON'T HAVE PERMISSION TO GO AHEAD! INTERACT WITH A SOVEREIGN CREDITOR AND POLICYHOLDER AND YOU ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE!




AGREEMENT



By proceeding against the notice, you agree to testify under full commercial responsibility and oath or for the public minutes before a jury, that you and the associated parties are proceeding lawfully and that you fully understand the nature of the actions in accordance with the Ministry's State Uniform Commercial Codes, Transport and Communications, International Common Law and International English Naval/Maritime law.


 


THIS ANNOUNCEMENT WARNING FOR VIOLATIONS IS SUBMITTED WITH THE REQUIREMENT OF A "DRIVER'S LICENSE", REGISTRATION OR PROOF OF INSURANCE and is therefore part of the OFFICIAL RECORD of any subsequent action and must be presented as evidence in that action. It should be noted that the Willful concealment of evidence is a felony – for any reason for this action, it may lead to administrative, authorised, UCC (Uniform Commercial Code) appeal and also legal action.


 


 


NOTICE TO THE OFFICIALS/REPRESENTATIVES OF THE HELLENIC REPUBLIC:


 


This document is not intended to cause harassment, intimidation, harassment, insult, conspiracy, blackmail, coercion, causing concern, alarm, contempt or discomfort or obstruction of any public duty and/or interest. IT PRESENTS ITSELF WITH HONEST AND PEACEFUL INTENTIONS, IT ONLY STATES THE REAL FACTS AND IS A GUARANTEE FOR THE PROTECTION OF MY PHYSICAL EXISTENCE FROM THE ABUSE OF ANY PUBLIC OFFICIAL.



*Any assurance contrary to This verified statement of facts will include the clause that you are committing fraud against the judicial authority.


 


META THE SERVICE OF THIS NOTICE;


1.RETURN HONESTLY AND PEACEFULLY IN YOUR DUTIES, READING THIS NOTICE ON ITS TOTAL. READ THE TABLE OF FEES HEREIN FOR WITHHOLDING AND THE DELAY OF THE SOVEREIGNTY OF THE SECURED PARTY.


2.ASK ADVICE FROM A SENIOR OFFICIAL, IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND OR DON'T BELIEVE WHAT REFERRED TO HEREIN. CONTACT YOUR SENIOR OFFICER BEFORE GO AHEAD.


3.ANY AND ALL COMMERCIAL LEGAL EMPLOYEES INVOLVED WILL BE CONSIDERED "PARTIES TO THE ACTION" AND WILL BECOME AS THEIR OWN, LIABLE DEBTORS SUBJECT TO ALL THAT IS MENTIONED HEREIN FOR THE SECURED PLACE YOU ARE AFFLICTING.


4.FILL IN THE OFFICERS' NOTICE SECTION AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS NOTICE; PROVIDING THE SIGNAL NUMBER, NAME, DEPARTMENT, CHIEF OF POLICE, AND A PERSONAL ADDRESS, AT WHICH THE CREDITOR CAN INVOICE THE DEBTOR.


5.RETURN SUCH DOCUMENTS [PRIVATE PROPERTY] IN GOOD CONDITION TO THE SECURED IMMEDIATELY.


6. LEAVE YOUR PRESENTATION AT THE SECURED PLACE IMMEDIATELY.


7.ALLOW IN THE SECURED PLACE, SAFE PASSAGE AND FREE NON-COMMERCIAL MOVEMENT, WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY AND HASSLE.


8.NA ENJOY THE HONOR AND BE PEACEFUL.


 


"I, AS A SOVEREIGN PHYSICIST, A MAN OF FLESH AND BONES, DO NOT GIVE YOU PERMISSION OR CONSENT TO INTERACT WITH ME, TO DETAIN ME, OR TO DELAY ME IN ANY WAY."


 


I WILL BE HONEST TO YOU, AND I WILL NOT GIVE/SHOW OR DISCLOSE/PROVIDE YOU ANY PRIVATE INFORMATION SUCH AS NAME OR DATE OF BIRTH, ANY GOVERNMENT LICENSES, IDENTITY CARDS, CAR INSURANCE DOCUMENTS, AS IS MY RIGHT UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF COMMON (CUSTOMARY) LAW.





JURISDICTION


 


NOTICE TO THE PRIVATE INDIVIDUAL WHO ACTS AS A JUDICIAL POLICE OFFICER [*note-the one who signed the fine, serving the call]


 


I present to you the this notice in peace and I acknowledge that you are also a man who shall comply with the common law. I realize that you are just doing your job as a commercial civil servant - however, it is imperative that the sovereigns free people, to give lawful and appropriate notice that we will not allow public servants to illegally violate the inalienable Common Law rights given to us by the Creator. I honor you as a natural person and I do not wish to enter into a contract with you with no way and I'm not giving you the permission you legally need to proceed to any commercial contract.


IF I AM FORCED TO DO ANYTHING AGAINST MY WILL, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ACTION UNDER COERCION AND UNDER PROTEST, WHICH HAS FULL, DIRECT, LEGAL REMEDIES IN THE LAW.

 


I UNDERSTAND THAT THE INTELLIGENT POLICE OFFICERS HAVE A DUTY TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN LAWS AND STATUTES – AND THOSE WHO THEY ARE ATTEMPTING TO IMPOSE STATUTES ON A FREE MAN, THEY ARE IN FACT VIOLATING THE LAW. I HAVE THE LEGAL RIGHT AND THE AUTHORITY TO I REFUSE ANY INTERACTION WITH EMPLOYEES WHO HAVEN'T NOTICED ME I VIOLATE THE PEACE, WHILE PERMANENT RECOGNITION BY CONSENSUS, IT EXCLUDES ANY POLICE OFFICER OR PROSECUTOR FROM PROSECUTING AGAINST A FREE MAN ON EARTH, UNDER ANY STATUTE LAW CREATED BY A FICTITIOUS BODY.


 




NOTICE FOR UCC AUTHORISED APPEAL


 


This is a factual and constructive notice that we should not violate privileged rights of this sovereign natural and free man who is ensured, by the eventual detention of or the delay of its activities. Please assist in its passage without delay. Any violation of its sovereign rights, according to the law, will be remedied through an administrative appeal to the UCC in the law for violation of rights. You are a civil servant subject to the Dominant. A Sovereign, free man and being flesh and blood and secured, cannot be governed, and is not subject to the Statutory Uniform Commercial Codes of the Ministry of Commerce. Transport & Communications, etc.


I AM NOT SUBJECT TO ANY "JURISDICTION", BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A SUBJECTIVE STATUS. IF YOU GO AHEAD, YOU ARE COMMITTING AN ACTION UNDER GLOBAL AND UNIVERSAL CONSTRAINTS, TO WHICH YOU ARE COMMITTED.

 



COMMON LAW NOTICE ON THE RIGHT TO TRAVEL WITHOUT A LICENSE REGULATIONS


 


"THE USE OF THE HIGHWAY FOR THE PURPOSES OF TRANSPORTATION AND TRANSPORTATION IS NOT A PRIVILEGE BUT A COMMON AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT, OF WHICH THE PUBLIC AND INDIVIDUALS CANNOT BE DEPRIVED OF RIGHTS." motor coach v. Chicago, 337 iii.200, 169 ne 22, 66 alr jur (lrst) highways, sec.163 inparamateria.


 


Everyone should know call themselves police officers, "government", their "courts", representatives, companies and other parties, that I am a natural, free and sovereign person, without Nationals. I am not subordinate to any entity anywhere, nor is any entity vassal to me. I do not dominate anyone, nor am I dominated. I may voluntarily choose to comply with the "statutes" that others try to impose on me, but no such "statutes" or the His "executioners" have no power over me. I am under a different jurisdiction and any UCC corporate charter code, documents, services, benefits, calls, warrants, contracts, usage physical violence, attempted arrest, imprisonment, or other actions on your part; are not authorized or permitted in accordance with the above MANDATORY jurisdictions orders and will be considered an international crime under the GLOBAL SINGLE COMMERCIAL JURISDICTION, WHICH IS THE LAW THAT IT IS ONLY THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CORPORATE "PERSONS" AND OFFICE HOLDERS.


--UNLESS I HAVE INTENTIONALLY HARMED SOMEONE OR PROPERTY WITHOUT HIS CONSENT AND THERE IS A WITNESS TO AN ALLEGED YOU HAVE NO JURISDICTION, RIGHT, OR DUTY TO PULL ME TO PUT IT ASIDE, TO TRAMPLE ON MY RIGHTS TO FREE MOVEMENT OR TO INTERACT WITH ME IN ANY WAY, ESPECIALLY, BY FORCING ME TO ACT UNDER PRESSURE AND IN PROTEST.


--UNLESS I, THE NATURAL AND FLESH-AND-BLOOD MAN, AM ACTIVE IN MARITIME/MARITIME TRADE, YOU HAVE NO JURISDICTION AND ARE COMMITTING AN INTERNATIONAL CRIME UNDER THE INTERNATIONAL LAWS OF THE U.C.C. BY WHICH I DECLARE MYSELF RECOGNIZED, HOLDING THE NECESSARY REGISTRATIONS GUARANTEES.


 


I AM NOT INVOLVED IN THE OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE USED FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES, I AM ENGAGED IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT WITH VEHICLES. I HAVE NOT VIOLATED THE PEACE, NOR HAVE I COMMITTED ANY CRIME, AND AS A RESULT I AM NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FURTHER DELAY OR PENALTY, AND I DEMAND, THAT IMMEDIATELY DEPART FROM MY PRESENCE IN PEACE.


 


YOU ONLY HAVE JURISDICTION ON FICTITIOUS CORPORATE ENTITIES THAT CONDUCT BUSINESS AND YOU CANNOT INTERACT, ENTER INTO CONTRACTS IN ANY WAY – WITH A DISTINCTION WITH FLESH AND BLOOD – AND WITH A SOVEREIGN, CREDITOR AND GUARANTOR!


I am a sovereign, non-resident, non-domestic, non-person, and non-individual, who is not subject to any real or fictional legislation or quasi-laws enacted by any state legislature, which was created by the people. You cannot legally refer to me as sovereign because, your state legislature can only regulate what it creates, and the state does not create sovereign policyholders Power.


You may only interact with a specific office/company, known as a "person". I am not a state "person" and you are not legally authorized to regulate or interact with me as an individual, in any way. "Hellas", is a jurisdiction of customary law, free men and women.


 


NOT I AM A "CITIZEN OF HELLENIC REPUBLIC S.A." -CIK: 0000931106. I am a citizen of the State of the Republic and I reject any attempt at expatriation. I'm not "resident", "franchisee", "national", "protected", "property", "movable financial guarantee" or "subject to jurisdiction" of any "monarch" or any corporate "republic", "parliament", "confederation", "State", "Territory", "Council", "City", "Municipal Politician" body" or other "government" allegedly "created" under "authority" of a "constitution" or other "decree". I am not subject to any "legislation", a service or organisation set up by such 'authorities', nor in the "jurisdiction" of any officer, officer or agent, who his "power" from them. I do not hold any position or office to be subordinate to the legislature.


 


AS INSURED CREDITOR [pursuant to UCC § 1-308 (ex UCC§ 1-207)] AND MAIN PROVIDER (PIPELINE/FINANCIER) OF THE "HELLENIC REPUBLIC Inc.", I DON'T NEED A LICENSE OR VEHICLE LICENSE OR INSURANCE TO TRAVEL FREELY WITH THE MY CAR, BASED ON – AMONG OTHER THINGS: THE ATTACHMENT -A PROPERTY LIST UCC, IN THE COMMERCIAL SECURITY CONTRACT, WHICH was agreed between me and the SINGLE WORLD COMMERCIAL CODE (U.C.C.), on --/--/20--, WITH NAME & CODE -of the prerequisite for the Application for Funding-Document: (Commercial Security Agreement: -------_SA), as well as with the APPLICATION UCC-1 FUNDING, which was similarly agreed between me and U.C.C., on --/--/20--, with ID CODE : UCC-1 # ---------------


 


I have not received No evidence or document that says I am required to have a permit driver's license or license to Travel Freely, or to show such proof of license -and as long as no notification is given to the people who apply for a driver's license (or other) that: already have a perfect right to use the streets without any permit and that they surrender valuable rights by taking over the regulatory licensing system, the State has committed a huge pre-fabricated scam. The driving licence, which is a legal contract under which the state is authorized by police powers, is valid only when the licensee assumes the burdens of the contract, and bargains his rights WITH FULL KNOWLEDGE, INTENTIONALLY AND VOLUNTARILY. A driver's license is a contract without the that the police are powerless to regulate actions or activities of people. Few, if any, driver's license holders deliberately give up of precious rights. They are told that they must have the license. This is not it is NOT TRUE, and it is a "legitimate" scam! No rational person voluntarily surrenders his complete freedom and does not accept in its place a set of statutory regulations.



According to by law, I DO NOT NEED LICENSING, LABELS, REGISTRATION, OR INSURANCE TO USE THE MY PRIVATE CAR ON PUBLIC ROADS AND HIGHWAYS, and YOU ARE VIOLATING THE LAW BY IMPOSING ON MY NATURAL ESSENCE, THE RELATIONSHIP WITH THE YOUR COMMERCIAL POLICIES. I have not committed any crime according to the public law and therefore am not subject to any further delay or penalty. I demand that you immediately depart from my presence in peace.


I, the INDEPENDENT SECURED AND CREDITOR, have the legal authority to use the debtor (deptor) as a means of transport in legal activities, such as the operation of a car for free travel, without permission by any and/or government officials, including police officers [peacekeepers], illegal government representatives (instead of 'persons'), judges and corporate traffic wardens, who cannot exercise any police power over those who act with respect to this knowledge, as only a fool would allow fictional entities of color of the law to dictate his actions—and, further, I have the right to Travel Freely, without having to. to have a license or pay for the use or enjoyment of the right.





TIMETABLE REMUNERATION


 


I, THE SOVEREIGN AND INSURED PARTY AND CREDITOR, I CLAIM THE MY COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR ANY VIOLATIONS BY STATE POLICE OFFICERS OFFICIALS, LEGISLATORS, COMPETITORS, MILITIA, POLICE OFFICERS IN GENERAL FORCES, GOVERNMENT MANDATES, AGENTS, OR PARTICIPANTS IN THE SYSTEM JUSTICE.


On the basis of the Responsible Disclaimer: UCC 1-3081-207 (document code, -----------) -THERE are fees for violating my freedom which are [note-*Differ from person to person depending on the Y.D.E.D. he has compiled]:


· DEKA THOUSANDS OF EUROS (10,000 €) PER SPECIAL INCIDENT & with the amount of FOUR THOUSANDS OF EUROS PER HOUR (4,000 €/hour) or part thereof, per violation per person, plus TWO THOUSAND EUROS PER 1/2 HOUR (2,000 €/30min.) or part of it, per violation per person,


·  moreover, FOUR THOUSANDS OF EUROS PER HOUR (4,000 €/hour) or part thereof, per violation per person, plus TWO THOUSAND EUROS PER 1/2 HOUR (2,000 €/30min.) or part of it, per violation per person, because of the freedom lost or the time spent in the IF I AM INTERROGATED OR IN ANY WAY DETAINED, BY HARASS OR OTHERWISE REGULATE THEMSELVES,


· and finally, €20,000.00 (TWENTY THOUSAND EUROS PER HOUR) OR PART OF THEM, IF THEY HANDCUFF ME, WITH TRANSFER, IMPRISON ME OR SUBJECT ME TO ANY TRIAL, WITHOUT MY EXPLICIT WRITTEN AND NOTARIZED CONSENT.


·         For the reason this, EVERYONE has an undeniable knowledge.


*Note: THE ABOVE CHARGES, ARE MENTIONED AND/OR RELATE TO ALL OFFENDING PARTIES FOR ALL VIOLATIONS REFERRED TO IN THE ABOVE STATEMENT UCC 1-3081-207, BY ANY LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY AGAINST MY NATURAL PERSONALITY AND EXISTENCE.


In addition, I claim the right to use notary to ensure the payment of the above-mentioned schedule of fees to any offender; who by his acts or omissions harms me or my interests, directly or through a dealer in any way.


*Note: THE USE OF A SCHEDULE OF FEES FOR THE LEGAL COLLECTION OF COMPENSATION DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY!


 


 


NOTICE AND A WARNING ABOUT LACK OF JURISDICTION


 


DEN MOU EHEI NO EVIDENCE PRESENTED ELEMENT OR DOCUMENTATION BASED ON COMMON-CUSTOMARY LAW, WHICH ALLOWS YOU TO HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ME, THE SOVEREIGN NATURAL MAN.


YOU ARE UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME JURISDICTION AND YOU OPERATE AND ACT UNLAWFULLY UNDER ANOTHER JURISDICTION: SINGLE COMMERCIAL JURISDICTION AGAINST ME, THE SOVEREIGN NATURAL AND OF A FREE MAN, WITH A SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY IN BOTH ILLEGAL JURISDICTIONS!


AS I REMAIN STEADILY UNDER NATURAL AND SOVEREIGN JURISDICTION OF CUSTOMARY LAW AND I HAVE LEGALLY RESERVED ALL MY RIGHTS THEREIN, YOU ARE UNDER A JUDICIAL BAN AND ARE VOID OF ANY AUTHORITY OF ANY KIND AT THIS TIME AND DO NOT YOU CAN PROCEED IN ANY WAY!


THE NAVY/SEA OR THE PRESUMED LEGAL JURISDICTION DOES NOT APPLY TO MY SOVEREIGN, NATURAL AND FREE OBJECTIVE CAPACITY.


 


The name in any [OR ANY COMMERCIAL CONTRACT] is not my name! It is the name of a fantastic corporate organization created by the government and which has been designated with FUNDS LETTERS, so that it resembles my name, without consent or conscious my knowledge. THIS FACT ALONE MAKES UNILATERAL, USELESS, MISLEADING the proposed CONTRACT, AND 'ab initio' INVALID AND UNENFORCEABLE. Use of the driver's license is not necessary by law and does not cause a union/contractual relationship between your office as corporate entity and my free man. I stand out as a special and I declare that I stand out from this CORPORATE APPARENT CASE. Based on the documents/agreements I have in my possession personal portfolio, I am defined as the sovereign secured party and representative of this alternative identity created by the government.


I have established FIRST RIGHT OF CLAIM in the amount of $15,000,000.00 on the corporate imaginary person/debtor, according to the filed commercial contract and the UCC-1 financial statement, which revokes the marketing of the government's birth certificate of a forged corporate imaginary "person" in the World Bank as a guarantee for its national debt HELLAS, through the manipulation of its titles. All compulsory government benefits concerning the sovereign natural and free man have been rejected by me, including all licenses, government services, and other so-called "benefits".


The secured party has no obligation against any corporate or state body and is not subject to them, while in those that I still participate in, I participate UNDER PRESSURE and UNDER DURESS, keeping my rights strong and WITHOUT PREJUDICE.


 


THE UCC-1 FUNDING DECLARATION AND THE ANNEXES TO THIS DOCUMENT IS AN INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION THAT CANNOT BE VIOLATED, TO CIRCUMVENTED OR HINDERED BY ANYONE, ANYWHERE AND ANYTIME!

 


My physical real non-corporate name, is under copyright notice (©™) and anyone who uses it Unlawfully or without my permission, he is liable for copyright infringement and is subject to a severe penalty. The table fees claimed for any use of my physical copy My written name is: 1.000.000,00 € per incident and it is also collectible by a notary and subject to further collection efforts and a credit report for non-payment. I, never was, am not today and will never be responsible for the debts, issues, or affairs of this fictitious entity [including the issues of the Ministry of Transport and Communications or the commercial traffic police] and there is no issue in relation to me, as the two identities are different*.



*The proof of what is written is attached, in good faith, despite the fact that no one obliges me to present the UCC's written testimony regarding It concerns my personal information and my recognition as a secured person creditor. Bearing in mind that Document No:---------------, is exclusively my own confidential contract, part of my portfolio and my private property, attached ABSOLUTELY CONFIDENTIAL! And only for your information, which ends with the return the completed notice by you back to me, the legal Holder who, sui juris, without prejudice I keep all rights strong.


 


EXPLANATORY NOTES: -THE CAPITALIZED FICTITIOUS COMMERCIAL ENTITY (DEPTOR), IS A FICTIONAL COMPANY CREATED BY THE GOVERNMENT AND SET UP FOR GOVERNMENT USE -AND I (the person in small print as Secured party), I AM A NATURAL AND FREE PERSON RESIDING IN THE LAND OF GREECE, NON-RESIDENT, NON-NATIVE AND A LIVING SOUL THAT WAS NOT CREATED BY ANY IMAGINARY CORPORATE BODY OR GOVERNMENT AND IS NOT SUBJECT TO ITS CONTROL, TO THE PARLIAMENT, TO THE SPECULATIVE LEGISLATIVE OR TO THE MAN-MADE SPECULATIVE EXTORTION ACTION OF THE UCC CODE. I HAVE SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY, I AM FREE FROM CONTROL AND I LIVE AND FULLY OBSERVE THE COMMON CUSTOMARY LAW!


I HAVE THE FULL LEGAL RIGHT [NOT GRANTED PRIVILEGE] TO TRAVEL FREELY IN ANY WAY, AND BY ANY TYPE OF TRANSPORT MEDIUM, WITHOUT LICENSE, LICENSES, CORPORATE SIGNS, INSURANCE, INSTITUTIONALIZED RULES, HARASSMENT OR INTERACTION BY ANY POLICE SUPERVISOR, FREELY IN ANY CITY AND ANY GLOBAL JURISDICTION YOU CAN NAME!


I have sovereign rights and as a natural and free man of the Earth, all rights to the maneuver management, guidance, driving and travel, with any form of motor means of transport, e.g. car, truck, motorcycle and the like, without any requirement for the submission of an application and without the obligation to obtain any government license, certificate, license certificate and the like of any kind.


I have the right to the right to move from place to place without the threat of imprisonment, the right to use public roads in the usual way course of life and without permission from any body!


Where the State permits the establishment of a company, can control its creation by establishing guidelines (statute, written code and not "law") for its operation (articles of association or persons). The companies that use the roads in the context of business activity do not use the roads in the context of ordinary life. There is difference between a company and an individual. The forgotten legal axiom is that the free people have the right to travel on the roads provided by the servants for this purpose, using the usual means of transport of the Day.


The travel authorization and all other permits cannot be required of free people; because assuming the limitations of a permit requires the waiver of a right.


Your driver's license can to be asked by people who use the highways for trade, trafficking or leasing – that is, whether they earn a living on the road and whether they use emergency machines Streets. That does not concern me at all!


If I don't use motorways for profit, I cannot be required to I have a driver's license, insurance, registrations, or company license plates for traffic.



 


*DEFINITIONS OF TERMS [SUCH AS THEY ARE DEFINED AND USED IN THE COMMERCIAL ARTICLES THAT CREATED THE INTERNATIONAL VEHICLE CODES]



If the correct application of the statutes in question is not clear or understandable, I quote a precise legal and factual definition of the terms used in relation to the specific point of the law. These terms do not mean, in their legal sense, context, what some assume they mean, resulting in the incorrect application of the statutes to their immediate use, as is the case this moment!


 


CAR AND MOTOR VEHICLE



There is a clear distinction between a car and a motor vehicle. A car is defined as: "The word 'car' denotes a recreational vehicle designed for transportation persons on motorways". -American Mutual Liability Ins. Co. in Chaput, 60 A.2d 118, 120- 95 NH 200. While the distinction is clearly made between the two, as the courts have stated:


"As a motor vehicle or paid car means a motor vehicle, other than the stadium car, used for the transport of persons for which remuneration shall be received.' International Motor Transit Co. v. Seattle, 251 P. 120. The term 'motor vehicle' means different and broader than the word "car"." —City of Dayton v. DeBrosse, 23 N.E.2d 647, 650-62 Ohio App. 232. The distinction is made very clear in title 18 U.S.C. 31: "Motor vehicle" means any description or other structure that is mechanically moved or attracted and is used for commercial purposes on national roads for the carriage of passengers or passengers and property. As "used for commercial purposes" means the transport of persons or goods for any fare, fee, percentage, charge or other consideration or directly or indirectly in relation to any business or other business that aims to make a profit.



LEGAL FACT: A CAR IS PERSONAL PROPERTY THAT IT IS USED FOR PRIVATE PURPOSES, WHILE A MOTOR VEHICLE IS A MACHINE THAT CAN BE USED ON HIGHWAYS FOR COMMERCIAL FOR PURPOSES OR FOR LEASE. MY CAR IS A CAR. AND IT'S PRIVATE MY PROPERTY AND I CAN USE IT FOR FREE PRIVATE TRAVEL WITHOUT PERMISSION. THIS IS A RIGHT AND NOT A PRIVILEGE!


 


_____________________________________________________________________


Let it be known to all that I, the _______ : of the family: ___________ ©™ sui juris, I claim expressly and reserve all my rights, under UCC §1-308 (ex UCC §1-207) – Record Number (code. u.c.c.: --------------, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights UN Declaration of Human Rights of 10 December 1948 and the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties


This notice removes any presumption that I, the :_________ :_________ ©™ do not have in the full possession of my physical, inalienable rights, and then, Anyone acting on this presumption is violating my rights. In addition, EVERYONE is notified that a sign On my vehicles, my moped, etc., it can be a diplomatic plate, / BOARD.


_____________________________________________________________________




The above signatory(s), stated in propria persona, is

and proves with satisfactory evidence that it is

the person whose The name is signed in this document.

 WITHOUT PREJUDICE - WITHOUT REDUCTION - UNDER DURESS

(There is no guarantee value, there is no liability, there is no presumption.)

All rights reserved.- Errors and omissions are excluded.




 


 




As a notary (the red fingerprint replaces the notarial seal) erga omnes, signed, sealed and sworn, the above signed: ___________ : of the family: ____________ ©™ , sui juris, on this ________ day of the month _________, in the year of the Lord Two thousand twenty and ______


 








 


 


 



Autograph of Common Law - Copyright© - All Rights Reserved




 


Required contact details, from the Traffic Department


Name :


Department


No. Signal:


Address:


Personal e-mail :


 


 


Sincerely,


 


:____________: ______________©™ - Copyright© All rights Reserved


 


Posted by Phoenix 

Labels: OVERTURNING PRESUMPTION, OFFICIALS, PUBLIC DOCUMENTS, CORPORATE COMMERCIAL SYSTEM, UCC, UCC 1-308, WITHOUT PREJUDICE 1-308