Unsecured Debt Can Be Terminated

Debts can be purged using the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. Credit history
can be restored by using the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Creditors can be defended
against with knowledge of simple contract law, Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles, rules of court and the basis that banks do not loan anything. Debt
collectors can be defended against with the basis that an assignee cannot
establish any contractual nexus to enforce a claim.

Banks are prohibited from loaning. They can’t loan other depositor’s money
because of the matching principle under GAAP. They can’t loan out nor risk any of
their own assets because of Federal Reserve regulations.
In order to accept a credit application or promissory note, the banks must convert
the customer’s note into a check and give it back to him. Only they can do this
because they have a monopoly on negotiable instruments. It is the customer who
creates the currency and funds the line of credit to himself. The customer is the
depositor (creditor). The banks conceal this fact by carrying out what appears to
be a loan approval process for each customer. There is no loan from the bank.
The object in defending yourself against a creditor that has not assigned the
account to a debt collector is to manipulate the creditor into a new agreement
and/or force the account into collections.

The creditor can be sent a notice of final payment with the expectation that the

creditor will not dispute the payment or its terms in writing, thereby accepting it
as payment in full. When the final payment is accepted, and the creditor has
failed to respond or object to the notice of final payment, it makes it very difficult
for them to maintain a claim against the account holder.
In practice, the creditor will call you to ask about late payments. It is prudent to
take a record of the caller’s name, company, mailing address, and phone and fax
numbers, date and time of call, and then request that the caller limit
communications with you only to writing. It is best to disconnect the call after
obtaining this information and then to send a written correspondence making the
same request.

If the calls continue, you can do this again or make a complaint with your state’s
attorney general’s office.
In most cases, the creditor will assign the account to collections. Once this
happens, the third party collection efforts are regulated under the Fair Debt
Collections Practices Act.

The debt can be assigned, but that doesn’t automatically mean that you have a
contract with the new 3rd party debt collector; in fact you don’t as long as you
don’t contract with them by acquiescence.
The third party assignee usually has no agreement with the debtor, so in order to
recover the loss that it chose to incur; it needs the debtor’s consent. This is
usually obtained by deceit, by tricking the debtor into accepting a new obligation.
You can request from them a validation of the purported debt. This they’re not
going to be able to fully respond to – the collector never provided any services or
products, neither is there an automatic obligation for you to pay.
When the collector responds with anything but some written agreement, evidence
of your consent or evidence of consideration (e.g. payment), they have failed to
validate.

Most collectors who receive this request will never pursue the collection.
If the collector persists in ignoring your request for validation, a complaint to the
Federal Trade Commission may be appropriate. Just listing the address for the
FTC on the second notice is likely to get positive results.

Get the full process with form and how to manual included in the Secured Party Creditor Pack..

If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger).

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192
and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in th e Federal
register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold
in the United States . Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23,
1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the
Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933
page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. McFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
"Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever
known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks. . ;" HJR 192 is the
insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the
American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of
the United States. For speaking like he did, Mr. McFadden was poisoned by the powers that be
by agents of that federal corporation.

HlR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bill s. It removed the requirement that the
United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the
inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also
cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to
be paid in gold - retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could
use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the
nonnal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency
used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new
medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a
debtor's creditors to discharge the debtor' s debts. That same currency, Federal Reserve Notes, is
used to discharge public debts. Take 

note; the Federal Reserve Notes have no value, as stated by the Federal Reserve!

In the 1950's the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to their States as a means of
unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with
commercial transactions and fictions as though they were real. Security instruments (commercial
paper) replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by
presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties , could be
used instead of money. Money (of exchange) and the need for money was disappearing, and
NEW money was being created i.e., 'Money of Account' (created by Bill of Exchange) and a
uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the commercial venue and the courts to
uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling
payment or performance (see 'Tender of Payment in your State statute"). All this was
accomplished by the mid 1960' s. And by 1964, most all the States had adopted the Uniform
Commercial Code.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people
engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled
thousands of years ago, but were refined and became more sophisticated over the years. In the
1900's the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became
a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in
enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in their- courts. If the claimants were
required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people,
they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combined the means of
dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive
commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the deceivers .
The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register (surrender) their property (land, cars, guns, children,
etc.) to the sub-divisions (States) under dictate by the United States, gained control of the
substance through the 'registrations' and the States were able to extract more ' use' taxes, from
the people to use the property of the State! The States and the United States became the Holder
of the titles to all the property, even children and many other things.
The definition of "property" is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The
property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another belong to
the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in
commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the
owners of the 'things.' That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of
paper - titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction . [Watch the movie Last Action
Hero and watch the confusion created when they try to mix substance and fiction.] Sometimes
the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It
is an impossibility!

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into a 'constructive' trust for the benefit of
the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate
trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be
commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a
constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be
the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his
remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law,
so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or
charges brought against his public person (Debtor-straw.man} by the United States.
If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund,
or financial ledger). The definition of "fund" is money set aside to 'Pay a debt. The fund \'S there
to discharge the public debts attributed. to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the
accommodating parties - the American people. The national debt IS what is owed is to the
owners of the registered things - the American people, as well as to other creditors!
If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by
accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United
States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get
around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he  agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor-person. If the people are truly the
principle, then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have
never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an
accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor's liabilities without getting consideration in
exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree
to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is
easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor-person. The presumption that he
is the accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable
for a tax on the thing he actually owns or owes.

Debtors may have the 'use' of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor
is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the
duties and responsibilities a debtor has . If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor
because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time
convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him . In addition. the
courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make. when
trying to use their remedy.

Now the quasi-owner (user) of the property (thing) , after learning the law and discovering who
he is in relation to the United States Corporation. can file a ucc Financing Statement based
upon a Security Agreement, registering his security interest in the artificial entity
DEBTOR PERSON, being the ENS LEGIS which the United States created after your Mom
signed the 'Root of Title Newborn Identification' and then was compelled to apply for a birth
certificate. That was the act of registering her biological property. her baby (substance). with the
State of . The United States holds the paper title (form), not the substance (baby). Until
your Financing Statement is filed, the United States is the holder of the title to the artificial
entity. Its name is spelled in all capital letter - JOHN HENRY DOE. When John Henry Doe files
the Financing Statement supported by a Security Agreement signed by the artificial entity
(JOHN) and the owner (John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN. The
ucc and the State commercial law are very specific about the effect of a registered security
interest. It has priority over most other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing. The
evidence that is missing in the court is the registered claim over the person (JOHN).
The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is going to handle his own
affairs in the future. That is done when you do the CHARGE BACK PROCESS by filing a Bill
of Exchange with the Secretary through which he 'charges up the UCC Contract Trust Account,'
in respect to the 'value' expressed on the Birth Certificate and the 'Directive' cover letter. The
social security number, belonging to your Debtor, is the Trust Account Number for a
charge back, for all the presumed charges brought against your Debtor for proper discharge.
Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery. The batter represents your public
person (JOHN), which is a dead entity that can function within the public maize of fiction,
transmitting benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up. You cannot go into
the public because you are not a fiction. JOHN has no power until it is charged with some
energy. That energy comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill , utility
bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a S amount and JOHN' S name on it as the
presumed debtor. The bill is the energy. It charges the dead JOHN. You can now discharge
JOHN and put JOHN'S accrual account with the charging party back to a zero balance. You as
the secured party creditor, having charged up the uce Contract Trust Account, now for the
'presentment' received in behalf of a debt owed by JOHN, you can discharge the fine, fee, tax or
debt with a negotiable instrument for the same S amount as the charging instrument
(presentment) stipulates. The charging party that receives your noncash item can process it back
through the United States Treasury through their financial institution. Note; if discharging IRS
Tax liability, the package/instrument goes directly to the Secretary of Treasury - U.S.
When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United States or one of its subdivisions,
you let the United States hold the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure
to disclose material facts to yo u at the time of registration. You probably retained possession of
the thing, but the United States/States invested the title and made a profit. If you did not
specifically authorize the United StateS/State and its agents to invest the legal title, the profits
made from that title belong to you, because as the owner, you remain the equitable title holder.
Legally, all the profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered things must go into
a fund for your benefit. If they did not put the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be
fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory registration, is fraud . If the
scenario attributed to Mandell House is now in full application in the United States, which it is,
the officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with treason I F they had not
provided a remedy, which they did . - House Joint Resolution 192 on June 5,1 933. This is their
insurance policy to assure they are not convicted of treason. That does not mean they cannot be
charged with treason, but the courts win dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which
relief can be granted. Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot sustain a charge
of treason. But Tort, now that's another matter!