“THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS A CROP OF HUMAN SLAVES”

Structure of the Birth Certificate

“THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS A CROP OF HUMAN SLAVES”

Structure of the Birth Certificate

Did the State Pledge Your Body to a Bank?

Right:  Some birth and marriage certificates are now "warehouse receipts," printed on banknote paper, which may mark you and yours as 'chattel' property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.

A certificate is a "paper establishing an ownership claim." - Barron's Dictionary of Banking Terms.  Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.

Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called "warehouse receipts."  The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at §7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions, which parallel a birth or marriage certificate are:

 

-the location of the warehouse where the goods are stored...(residence)

-the date of issue of the receipt.....("Date issued")

-the consecutive number of the receipt...(found on back or front of the certificate, usually in red numbers)

-a description of the goods or of the packages containing them...(name, sex, date of birth, etc.)

-the signature of the warehouseman, which may be made by his authorized agent...(municipal clerk or state registrar's signature)

Birth/marriage certificates now appear to at least qualify as "warehouse receipts" under the Uniform Commercial Code.  Black's Law Dictionary, 7th ed. defines:

warehouse receipt. "...A warehouse receipt, which is considered a document of title, may be a negotiable instrument and is often used for financing with inventory as security."

Since the U.S. went bankrupt in 1933, all new money has to be borrowed into existence. All states started issuing serial-numbered, certificated "warehouse receipts" for births and marriages in order to pledge us as collateral against those loans and municipal bonds taken out with the Federal Reserve's banks.  The "Full faith and Credit" of the American people is said to be that which back the nation's debt.  That simply means the American people's ability to labor and pay back that debt.  In order to catalog its laborers, the government needed an efficient, methodical system of tracking its property to that end.  Humans today are looked upon merely as resources - "human resources," that is.

Governmental assignment of a dollar value to the heads of citizens began on July 14, 1862 when President Lincoln offered 6 percent interest bearing-bonds to states who freed their slaves on a "per head" basis.  This practice of valuating humans (cattle?) continues today with our current system of debt-based currency reliant upon a steady stream of fresh new chattels to back it.

Additional Birth Certificate Research

Federal Children

 by Joyce Rosenwald

In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act created the birth "registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the "Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for "other purposes." One of those other purposes provided for the establishment of a federal bureau designed to cooperate with state agencies in the overseeing of its operations and expenditures. What it really did was create a federal birth registry which exists today, creating "federal children." This government, under the doctrine of "Parens Patriae," now legislates for American children as if they are owned by the federal government. Through the public school enrollment process and continuing license requirements for most aspects of daily life, these children grow up to be adults indoctrinated into the process of asking for "permission" from Daddy government to do all those things necessary to carry out daily activities that exist in what is called a "free country."

 

Before 1921 the records of births and names of children were entered into family bibles, as were the records of marriages and deaths. These records were readily accepted by both the family and the law as "official" records. Since 1921 the American people have been registering the births and names of their children with the government of the state in which they are born, even though there is no federal law requiring it. The state tells you that registering your child's birth through the birth certificate serves as proof that he/she was born in the united States , thereby making him/her a United States Citizen. For the past several years a social security number has been mandated by the federal government to be issued at birth.

In 1933, bankruptcy was declared by President Roosevelt. The governors of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including the citizenry, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve system. To wit:"Full faith and credit" clause of Const. U.S. article 4. sec. 1, requires that foreign judgement be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state of it's origin. That foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which they are entitled in home state. And that a judgement or record shall have the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it has by law or usage in the state from whence taken.

Black's Law Dictionary, 4th Ed. cites omitted.

The state claims an interest in every child within it's jurisdiction. The state will, if it deems it necessary, nullify your parental rights and appoint a guardian (trustee) over your children. The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many years. It is presumed by those who have researched this issue, that the child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate, and the social security number is the numbering or registration of the trust, allowing for the assets of the trust to be tracked. If this information is true, your child is now owned by the state. Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt united states. We are now designated by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES," with a new crop born every year."

In 1923, a suit was brought against federal officials charged with the administration of the maternity act, who were citizens of another state, to enjoin them from enforcing it, wherein the plaintiff averred that the act was unconstitutional, and that it's purpose was to induce the States to yield sovereign rights reserved by them through the federal Constitution's 10th amendment and not granted to the federal government, and that the burden of the appropriations falls unequally upon the several States, held, that, as the statute does not require the plaintiff to do or yield anything, and as no burden is imposed by it other than that of taxation, which falls, not on the State but on her inhabitants, who are within the federal as well as the state taxing power, the complaint resolves down to the naked contention that Congress has usurped reserved powers of the States by the mere enactment of the statute, though nothing has been, or is to be, done under it without their consent (Commonwealth of Massachusetts vs. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury et.al..) Mr. Alexander Lincoln, Assistant Attorney General, argued for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts . To wit:

I. The act is unconstitutional. It purports to vest in agencies of the Federal Government powers which are almost wholly undefined, in matters relating to maternity and infancy, and to authorize appropriations of federal funds for the purposes of the act.

Many examples may be given and were stated in the debates on the bill in Congress of regulations which may be imposed under the act. THE FORCED REGISTRATION OF PREGNANCY, GOVERNMENTAL PRENATAL EXAMINATION OF EXPECTANT MOTHERS, RESTRICTIONS ON THE RIGHT OF A WOMAN TO SECURE THE SERVICES OF A MIDWIFE OR PHYSICIAN OF HER OWN SELECTION, are measures to which the people of those States which accept its provisions may be subjected. There is nothing which prohibits the payment of subsidies out of federal appropriations. INSURANCE OF MOTHERS MAY BE MADE COMPULSORY. THE TEACHING OF BIRTH CONTROL AND PHYSICAL INSPECTION OF PERSONS ABOUT TO MARRY MAY BE REQUIRED.

 

By section 4 of the act, the Children's Bureau is given all necessary powers to cooperate with the state agencies in the administration of the act. Hence it is given the power to assist in the enforcement of the plans submitted to it, and for that purpose by its agents to go into the several States and to do those acts for which the plans submitted may provide. As to what those plans shall provide, the final arbiters are the Bureau and the Board. THE FACT THAT IT WAS CONSIDERED NECESSARY IN EXPLICIT TERMS TO PRESERVE FROM INVASION BY FEDERAL OFFICIALS THE RIGHT OF THE PARENT TO THE CUSTODY AND CARE OF HIS CHILD AND THE SANCTITY OF HIS HOME SHOWS HOW FAR REACHING ARE THE POWERS WHICH WERE INTENDED TO BE GRANTED BY THE ACT.

(1) The act is invalid because it assumes powers not granted to Congress and usurps the local police power. McCulloch v. Maryland , 4 Wheat. 316, 405; United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542, 549-551.

In more recent cases, however, the Court has shown that there are limits to the power of Congress to pass legislation purporting to be based on one of the powers expressly granted to Congress which in fact usurps the reserved powers of the States, and that laws showing on their face detailed regulation of a matter wholly within the police power of the States will be held to be unconstitutional although they purport to be passed in the exercise of some constitutional power. Hammer v. Dagenhart, 247 U.S. 251; Child Labor Tax Case, 259 U.S. 20; Hill v. Wallace, 259 U.S. 44.

The act is not made valid by the circumstance that federal powers are to be exercised only with respect to those States which accept the act, for Congress cannot assume, and state legislatures cannot yield, the powers reserved to the States by the Constitution. Message of President Monroe, May 4, 1822 ; 4 Elliot's Debates, p. 525; Pollard's Lessee v. Hagan, 3 How. 212; Escanaba Co. v. Chicago , 107 U.S. 678; Coyle v. Oklahoma , 221 U.S. 559; Cincinnati v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 223 U.S. 390.

 

(2) The act is invalid because it imposes on each State an illegal option either to yield a part of its powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment or to give up its share of appropriations under the act. A statute attempting, by imposing conditions upon a general privilege, to exact a waiver of a constitutional right, is null and void. Harrison v. St. Louis & San Francisco R.R. Co., 232 U.S. 318; Terral v. Burke Construction Co., 257 U.S. 529.

(3) The act is invalid because it sets up a system of government by cooperation between the Federal Government and certain of the States, not provided by the Constitution. Congress cannot make laws for the States, and it cannot delegate to the States the power to make laws for the United States . In re Rahrer, 140 U.S. 545; Knickerbocker Ice Co. v. Stewart, 253 U.S. 149; Opinion of the Justices, 239 Mass. 606.

The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority to tax, which is in itself unconstitutional. What was once declared as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of this nation in the past should be upheld in a court challenge today. The constitution hasn't changed. What has changed is the way this government views human life. Today we are defined as human resources, believed to be owned by government. The government now wants us, as individuals, to be tagged and tracked. Government mandated or legislated National I.D. is unconstitutional anyway you look at it. Federal jurisdiction to legislate for the several states does not exist and could never survive a court challenge as shown above. Writing letters to elected public servants won't save us when we all know their agenda does not include serving those who placed them in power. Perhaps the 10th amendment of the federal constitution guaranteeing states rights will, if challenged, when making it known that we as individuals of the several states will not be treated as chattel of the U.S. government. If the federal government believes they own us, and as such have the right to demand national I.D. cards, and health I.D. cards, which will in truth tag us as we tag our animals, then let them bring forth the documents to prove their authority to legislate for it. If our G-D given rights to liberty and freedom, which were the foundation upon which this nation was created do not exist, and liberty and freedom is only an illusion under which the American people suffer, then let the governments of this nation come forward and tell the people. But...if we are indeed free, then we should not have to plead or beg before our elected public servants to be treated as such. If, in truth we are not free, then perhaps it's time to let the final chapter of the Great American Revolution be written..........

 

 

 

 

Section 8--102. Definitions.

(15) "Security", except as otherwise provided in  Section  8--103,

             means  an  obligation of an issuer or a share, participation,

             or  other  interest  in  an  issuer  or  in  property  or  an

             enterprise of an issuer:

               (i) which  is  represented  by  a  security  certificate in

                   bearer or registered form, or the transfer of which may

                   be registered upon books maintained for that purpose by

                   or on behalf of the issuer;

              (ii) which is one of a class or series or by  its  terms  is

                   divisible   into   a   class   or   series  of  shares,

                   participations, interests, or obligations; and

             (iii) which:

                   (A) is, or  is  of  a  type,  dealt  in  or  traded  on

                       securities exchanges or securities markets; or

                   (B) is  a  medium  for  investment  and  by  its  terms

                       expressly provides that it is a  security  governed

                       by this Article.

Section 8--103. 

Rules  for  Determining  Whether Certain Obligations and

                    Interests are Securities or Financial Assets.

    (a) A share or  similar  equity  interest  issued  by  a  corporation,

  business trust, joint stock company, or similar entity is a security.

    (b) An  "investment  company  security"  is  a  security.  "Investment

  company security" means a share or similar equity interest issued by  an

  entity  that  is  registered  as an investment company under the federal

  investment company laws, an interest in a unit investment trust that  is

  so  registered,  or  a  face-amount  certificate issued by a face-amount

  certificate company that is so registered.  Investment company security

  does  not  include  an  insurance  policy or endowment policy or annuity

  contract issued by an insurance company.

    (c) An interest in a partnership or limited liability company is not a

  security unless it is dealt in or traded on securities exchanges  or  in

  securities  markets,  its  terms expressly provide that it is a security

  governed by this Article, or  it  is  an  investment  company  security.

  However,  an interest in a partnership or limited liability company is a

  financial asset if it is held in a securities account.

    (d) A writing that is a  security  certificate  is  governed  by  this

  Article and not by Article 3, even though it also meets the requirements

  of  that Article. However, a negotiable instrument governed by Article 3

  is a financial asset if it is held in a securities account.

    (e) An option or similar obligation issued by a  clearing  corporation

  to its participants is not a security, but is a financial asset.

    (f) A  commodity contract, as defined in Section 9--102(a)(15), is not

  a security or a financial asset.

Section 8--201. Issuer.

    (a) With  respect  to  an obligation on or a defense to a security, an

  "issuer" includes a person that:

         (1) places or authorizes the placing of its name  on  a  security

             certificate, other than as authenticating trustee, registrar,

             transfer   agent,   or   the   like,  to  evidence  a  share,

             participation, or other interest in its  property  or  in  an

             enterprise,  or to evidence its duty to perform an obligation

             represented by the certificate;

         (2) creates a share, participation,  or  other  interest  in  its

             property  or  in  an enterprise, or undertakes an obligation,

             that is an uncertificated security;

         (3) directly or indirectly creates a fractional interest  in  its

             rights or property, if the fractional interest is represented

             by a security certificate; or

         (4) becomes  responsible  for,  or  in  place  of, another person

             described as an issuer in this section.

    (b) With respect to an obligation on  or  defense  to  a  security,  a

  guarantor is an issuer to the extent of its guaranty, whether or not its

  obligation is noted on a security certificate.

    (c) With  respect  to  a  registration  of  a transfer, issuer means a

  person on whose behalf transfer books are maintained.

You are considered an infant, “Ward” of the “STATE” as your Mother as the “Informant”

The Internal Revenue Manual (I.R.M.) 21.7.13.3.2.2, “An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.” An infant is anyone under the ager of 21.

Your Mother allegedly Abandoned You at birth. Have you noticed the Mother’s address is already pre-typed in one of the boxes? Have you noticed there is no address for the Father on the COLB?

Have you noticed, it is the address of the Mother’s “MAIDEN”; i.e. “unmarried”, name in that box? And have you noticed they had the Mother sign as the Informant, and not the Father?

You are considered an infant, “Ward” of the “STATE” as your Mother as the “Informant”, (a person who informs on another person to the authority) signed your Record of Live Birth, allegedly acting as the Trustee of the Executors (Fathers) Estate. If she declared she was married, then the father and mother are one-in-law and thus the Mother would have the same authority as the Father: executor. However, as an unmarried woman, they assume she is acting as the co-Executor of the Estate, or in the capacity of a Trustee; one with authority to sign over property. However, she has none without her husband’s approval, in a common law marriage. In a civil marriage, she has no authority. We must also note that the line of executor would fall on the nearest male relative. Not only is the mother without legal representation, no male is listed either. In fact, all Male relationships are left off the documentation.

There is absolutely no reason for the Father not to be on a birth record, except for religion. Matthew 23:9 And call no man your father on the earth: for one is your Father, even he who is in heaven.The first amendment clearly prevents the government from adding his name: i.e. “prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of religion or impeding the free exercise of religion”. Thus, the term “father” would impede the establishment of religion.

The STATE of OKLAHOMA’S very own Instructions on Completing the Birth Certificate:“Signature of Parent: Have parent review the Certificate of Live Birth for accuracy, read the statement contained in this section and sign this section certifying the accuracy of the certificate. We suggest that you ask only the mother to sign the birth certificate. Never have a parent sign a blank or incomplete certificate.”

Now why would the Dept. of Health and Vital Statistics teach Doctors, Nurses, and Hospital administrators to ‘coerce’ the Mother into signing the “Certificate of Live Birth” instead of the Father, who is the Executor of the Estate? Because the Executor is the Highest Office of the Estate, and the STATE does not care to deal with Him; they would rather go after the Informant/Trustee instead.

Attempting to Administrate an Estate without written-authorized consent of the Executor is very costly; people go to prison, but if they can ‘coerce’ the Mother/Informant/Trustee to sign over the property, then they “appear” to have a legal leg to stand on. However, it is all based in fraud. Keep as many people as you can ignorant, then you can have the blind leading the blind. 

When a child is born in the United States

 When a child is born in the United States (and now all over the world) a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of Birth. The key word here is "registered" as in registered in international commerce. A child then become the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000) and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank, which then uses it as collateral in order to issue Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC 511). (Obtaining a birth certificate is not required under common law.)

A bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corp. At 55 Water Street in New York, about two blocks down the street from the FED. It is a high rise office building and the sign out front reads "the tower of power". When the birth certificate is issued, a separate legal entity is created, The separate entity, or alter ego (ALL CAPTIAL LETTER NAME) is the "straw man" (See Black's Law 6th edition dictionary) and it is the "accomodation party" of the Uniform commercial code 3-415. 

Those all-capital letters do not represent the flesh and blood "Jack Smith” who was born to 'Momma Smith'. Those all cap letters represent the CORPORATE SURROGATE of Jack Smith known as "the strawman" that is REPRESENTING the flesh and blood Jack Smith in the CORPORATE COURT SYSTEM that has replaced Common Law courts, which the government doesn't want you to know about or think had ever existed.

The "name" is credit (see Black's 6th "accommodation party".) Therefore the right (or the use) has been separated from the title or deed.) The "Strawman" holds the title ( he belongs to the government's client who bought the title) and the real live you, flesh and blood man or woman has only naked possessions with the limited "right" to use the things. Maybe that is why our civil rights suits get dismissed out of court on Civil Rule 12(b)(6) motions. This deals with the "failure to state a title upon which relief can be granted." A claim is another word for "title". We have "failed to state upon which relief can be granted". We do not own the "title" to our own bodies anymore. When the straw man (you) violate some rule or statue (for instance a traffic ticket), the flesh and blood, the real you has to appear at the arraignment and admit the straw man's name (credit), and the "energy" surety is due and payable (fine) by the flesh and blood mwn who is in use of the straw man. This is why it is so important to "voluntarily give" your name to the magistrate (court). The defendant is the straw man. The real you, the flesh and blood you is the "offender".   Go into a court room and fail to admit to your "NAME" and see how frustrated the Judge gets. The only way they can continue is to create the joinder between you and the NAME. You are not your NAME.  And they only have jurisdiction over the NAME. 

When you are given a birth certificate an entirely separate legal entity was created. This is called the "strawman". Of course this was done without your knowledge or consent as you were just an infant at the time. Your parents also had no idea their biological property would be used as security to back the fiat paper currency of our nation. The strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope that when you grew up, you would be fooled into believing that the strawman is actually you. Thus you'd be liable for all of the imaginary costs and liabilities attached to the strawman by these con-artists.  It is shown in the ALL CAPITAL letter name displayed on the birth certificate, social security number, driver's license, tax forms, utility bills, and even credit card bills. 

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse," is the excuse they use to purport this scheme upon the American people. However, this scheme exists in many other countries, proving just how far spread this deception goes. It comes down to wordplay, also known as legalese. Common words we use every day actually have an entirely different meaning when it comes to law. Yet, because we aren't privy to the knowledge of the "law society", we are so easily duped, via fraud and coercion, into being a part of the scheme. A part of the machine.

When anything is registered with the state, ownership is waived and all you are left with is a title, or a certificate. (i.e, the certificate of live birth, the title to your vehicle.)  The registering of a baby's birth actually passes "ownership" of the baby to the government and that allows the State to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that.   This applies until the child reaches the 'age of maturity' set by the current legal statutes.   Doing that is not "lawful" but after the birth has been registered, it is "legal" and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly. Another way the State can gain ownership of a child is via the Marriage License.  With this, the government becomes the principal in a contract involving the three of you, and gain an asset, which is then in the control of the government, the product of that marriage; the biological property; the children. 

In Admiralty Law, Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.

To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage, where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward which they brought into this world by delivery, the act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards. 

Then they asked your mother for your legal name in Upper Lower case which consists of one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally funded hospital, an act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust or substance thereof, was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the commercial registry as cargo under transportation. 

The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and registered with the State, via Certificate of registry, in commercial maritime law which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving him/her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel occurred identified by the filing with, for example the "Florida State Department of Health", Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel. 

Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s asset, a certificate of indebtedness and funded the bond through the IMF based on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same.

If you have an older-style Birth Certificate, look on the Reverse side of it, to see 3 points of interest.

1) A 6-10 digit Number that you have never used in your life.

2) The words "Revenue Receipt" on the left side of this number.

3) The words "For Treasury Purposes Only" on the right side of the number.

So now the IMF has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested with the "State of Florida", and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve account. 

That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the "defendant", the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for the IMF. 

Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the Registrar/Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she is taken care of properly.

 

This first Legal Person attached to you, is known as a "NATIONAL CITIZEN" which later becomes synonymous with being a "Government Employee", when you SUBMIT (give in) an APPLICATION (to beg) for REGISTRATION (to sign over your rights) to become a SINner, (by signing up for the Fraud called Social Insurance or Social Security).

 

You then receive your Employee ID # (also known as a SIN #) which creates another Person called a "TAXPAYER". This means you consent to the Income Tax Act, and now makes you liable for the Income Tax, in exchange for the "Benefits" of being a Government Employee.

When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you, because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on behalf of the beneficial owner "the trust”, which is resident within a territory occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes "of trade” effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade with the enemy for the beneficial owner the "trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying, presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or chose in action on behalf of the trust.

"A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and that of state of country only." [19 Corpus Juris Secundumn (C.J.S), Corporations 886]