Traffic Ticket (Nearly any charging instrument can be handled this way.)



NOTICE:  When a petition for abatement is before a court, that court is charged with according to the petitioner to the advantage if there is doubt on the part of the court.  In addition, courts should take cognizance of the law that provides:  Where conditions for its issuance exist, abatement is a matter of right, not of discretion.  The misnomer or mis-description of a party defendant is ground for abatement, and grounds for abatements are the same for equity and law cases.

Also, please note that the abatement does not preclude petitioners remedies and relief available under any law forum for the injury and damages incurred by false accusations from corporate officers, and the like.


 Demonstrating Competence in Commerce.



(These events occurred on Dec. 10, 2016 A.D. in the Municipal Court for the City of Tumwater, Washington.  Prior to entering the Court, Our Man has written on the face of the ticket "Refused for Cause without Dishonor, Abandoned Paper and Fraudulent Commercial Claim".  The ticket was returned to the Clerk of the Court within 72 hours of being issued.  About 10 days later, Our Man received a Notice of Mitigation Hearing regarding this matter for the stated date.  Our Man then put in a one page Notice and Demand for Abatement.  No other actions were taken prior to going into court.  I have changed only the name of Our Man.  All other information is true and correct as best as I know.)
Judge Lyman:  The case of JOHN HENRY SMITH.
(Our Man walks up to the Defendant's Lectern and starts shuffling his papers.  The Judge has a large pile of papers in his hand.  Probably 30 to 40 pages of paper.  Now Our Man has not put any of this in the case.  Hmmmm.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
(Our Man doesn't answer but continues to sort his papers.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?  (A little emphasis on the question.)
Our Man:  Is this being recorded?
Judge Lyman:  Yes.  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
Our Man:  If I may read my statement, I think it will become clear.
Judge Lyman:  O.K., go ahead.
Our Man:  I am John Henry of the family Smith.  I am here today to settle this matter.
Regarding Number TPD7Y2231291 I'm here today, appearing specially and not generally, to abate the matter of a worthless security interest known as a UCC-1 commercial lien in the form of a "TRAFFIC INFRACTION" against the Federal Reserve account in the name of JOHN HENRY SMITH, a decedent.  Said worthless security interest was created by an employee of CITY OF TUMWATER who identified himself as Jon Weiks #0032 on October 29, 2007, a mere pirate operating under color of law, who on said date and with subterfuge attempted to attach private copyrighted dead man statutes to me, a living Man, for the express purpose of stealing my sweat equity .  I then exercised my Right of Avoidance to this offered commercial venture by returning this abandoned and defective paper for cause without dishonor to Sheryle Wyatt or her agent on October 31, 2007.  This was clearly a case of mistaken identity as the charged entity is a decedent under Title 26 USC and not me and this is the basis upon which I move for abatement.

"Sir, are you prepared to abate this matter now?"
(It would be helpful to know, that Our Man is about 6'5" tall and speaks rather slowly in a monotone voice;  totally unthreatening in his demeanor.)
Judge Lyman:  NO!

Our Man:      I will then continue my statement as follows: Let the record reflect that J.V. Lyman has denied the Principal's motion for abatement.  My rejection of the offer made by CITY OF TUMWATER to raid the Decedent's estate,  one JOHN HENRY SMITH, should have ended the matter, however, apparently this private commercial trading company known as "CITY OF TUMWATER/MUNICIPAL COURT DUNNS # 03-851-7355, SIC # 91110201, Cage Code # 1T9M3", a store front masquerading as an office in the judicial branch of Government and operating under the Department of Defense, is hell bent for it's own personal gain on probating the estate of JOHN HENRY SMITH, of which I am the Owner and Principal.  For the record, I object to the probating of said estate and do not give my permission thereto.  I am here today for the express purpose of establishing my Right of Avoidance if anyone should attempt to impose a Claim of Distress against the person of my collateral.  Any outcome on this matter other than an outright abatement or a check written to me for certified funds today assuming the transfer of funds has already taken place, will result in a Demand to the DTCC (Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation) for Investigation of Fraud on the TRAFFIC INFRACTION, a fraudulent
security.
I now ask you the following:
Does the prosecutor have a 1099OID in regard to the "charge"?
Judge Lyman:  There is no Prosecutor here.
Does the clerk?
(Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.)
I've got my claim here…where is yours?
(Again Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.
Our Man holds up his IRS forms 706, 709, and 1099OID.)
Tell me, Sir, who the payor is and also who the recipient of the funds is.

If you're the recipient, then I guess you'll be paying the transfer taxes on this charitable contribution from the Decedent's estate which you are attempting to probate here.  We both know that if you haven't paid the tax, you have no claim in Equity.

ARE YOU READY NOW, SIR, TO ABATE THIS MATTER?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's question and continues on.)
Sir, have you paid the taxes?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
Sir, have you already probated this estate behind my back?
Under 26 USC 2002 you are personally liable for payment as the executor defined under 2203 because you have actual or constructive possession of the property.
Judge Lyman:  It sounds like you would like this matter mitigated.  I am going to read the Officer's affidavit into the record.  (The Judge proceeds to read about a 5 page Affidavit from the Officer.  The Officer covered just about everything possible except counting the dents and scratches on Our Man's car.  Amazingly complete.)
Judge Lyman:  I can't determine from the Officers Affidavit whether you committed an infraction of the Law or not.  I am dismissing this matter.
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's and continues reading his script into the record.)
Sir, have you already taken a charitable contribution from my estate to fund your purchase of private equities in mutual funds?

Sir, have you already submitted a 1099R for that purpose?
If you've acquired funds from the decedent's estate that makes you a qualified heir and not paying the taxes makes the property you stole contraband which means all the forfeiture statutes kick in.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case.
(Our Man just keeps on reading.)
Unless you abate this matter here and now OR give me a check for the funds you stole, I will be alerting the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS that you are guilty of tax evasion and money laundering and to start an investigation on you personally with regards to my estate.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case!  (The Judge is turning red and sweating).
(Our Man just walks up to the lady acting like a Clerk and hands her all his IRS forms and leaves.  The Judge is visibly shaken by the whole matter.)



Who died before they collected Social Security?


KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERYONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ IT.THIS IS SURE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT!THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE SOCIAL SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?


Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your employer did too.
It totaled 15% of your income before taxes.
If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500.
Read that again.
Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny?
We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a government bank to insure you and I, that we would have a retirement check from the money we put in, not the Government.
Now they are calling the money we put in an entitlement when we reach the age to take it back.
If you calculate the future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the Government pays on the money that it borrows).
After 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98. If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit!
If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month.

THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN BERNIE MADOFF EVER DID.

Entitlement my foot; I paid cash for my social security insurance!
Just because they borrowed the money for other government spending, doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!
Remember Congressional benefits?
--- free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days.
Now that's welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security retirement payments entitlements?
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.
Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?
It was supposed to be in a locked box, not part of the general fund.
Sad isn't it?
99% of people won't have the guts to SHARE this.
I'm in the 1%

I JUST DID!


UCC 1 Debt Elimination

On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (R-OH) Chairman of the House Banking and Finance Committee brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. To protect themselves from these charges both the House and the Senate, on JUNE 5, 1933, passed House Joint Resolution 192. It provided that the people, who had delivered their gold to the federal government following an illegal proclamation by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their substance, had been taken from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.

The basis of UCC-1 debt elimination derives from HJR-192 in which the Corporate US board of directors, the Congress, removed from the flesh and blood men and women of the several united States of America their substance with which they can pay for things and replaced it with fictitious "money" in the form of debt instruments called Federal Reserve Notes. This created the exemption.

Essentially, the acceptance/redemption debt elimination process obtains access to the trust account that the federal government has been using since your birth to monetize and pay off the national debt. They automatically made the government the trustee of that account and used your energy and talent to fund the national government. With your birth certificate sent from the state in which you were born, the Department of Treasury creates a constructive trust account that permits the corporate United States and all of the other subsidiary corporations, states, counties, cities, etc. to interact with you as a corporate, fictitious entity. They are fictitious public entities that cannot interact with you, the real, living person. But they have convinced you, the living flesh and blood person that they are referring to you. You have voluntarily accommodated this interaction on behalf of your fictitious entity, your "corporation."

By filing your UCC-1 financial statement, security agreement, negotiable bill of exchange and the Federal Reserve routing numbers with the fictitious corporate government entities, you separate yourself from that accommodation and take the position as the first creditor to that debtor. The debt belongs to the Corporate You, but the real you has been making the payments. Now you will stand first in line to utilize the collateral held in your trust account by the government. Using this trust account as they have done, you can assign credit to the bank at which you, the fictitious entity, owe the debt. A simple transaction discharges that debt. Who can now complain that the debt is not satisfied? You have done what you have agreed to do, but the credit did not come from your checking account. It was a non-cash transaction in the public fiction of commerce under the Uniform Commercial Code.

In the case of mortgage elimination, the credit in your “strawman” man account is directed to redeem your note through a commercial Bill of Exchange. This credit is transferred to the bank holding your mortgage to discharge the debt. If the bank accepts this legal tender as per mortgage agreement, you request the reconveyance of the deed back to you. Should the bank refuse the offer of legal tender and will not discharge the debt, they are in dishonor by failing to perform according to the mortgage agreement. As the grantor of that mortgage you can revoke your agreement within 33 days by foreclosing on the bank. Simultaneously, you seek judicial review of the administrative procedures you have followed in accordance with pertinent statutes. Even if the judge refuses to sign the order, in 6 months it is ruled in your favor by default. Should the bank refuse to reconvey the deed, a clear title is provided by transferring the property through three trusted individuals: buyer A for $10 and consideration and after 10 days sold to buyer B for $10 and consideration for another 10 days, buyer C and finally to you for $10 and consideration for 91 days, then it is recommended that the property be sold to your asset protection program in which you are established as its beneficiary. This avoids loss of property made vulnerable to the predatory attorneys due to the new status of a property that is free and clear of debt.

Discharge Almost Any Debt with Proper Use of the UCC....

SECURED PARTY CREDITOR PROCESS



Living Persons (people), exist in a real world.

LEGAL PERSONS (corporations) exist in a fictional world.

Governments, Corporations, Agencies, FICTITIOUS CORPORATIONS, etc. are examples of a LEGAL PERSON.

LEGAL PERSONS can only deal directly with other LEGAL PERSONS (agencies, states, etc.)

LEGAL PERSONS can not deal directly with Living Persons (You).

In order for a LEGAL PERSONS to deal with Living Persons, there must be a connection, a go-between.

To establish a connection, a FICTIONAL LEGAL PERSON was deceitfully created by the government.

For that purpose, your lawful name of birthright was fraudulently replaced with a LEGAL NAME.

Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is not you, the living flesh and blood person.

Your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN (a fiction just make belief).

This was accomplished without your knowledge by using your birth certificates as the MCO (manufacturers certificate of origin) and the state in which you were born was used as the port of entry.

The artificial person created by law a with Your Name in ALL-CAPITAL LETTERS is the STRAWMAN.

This fraudulent act gives Government a LEGAL PERSON with whom to deal directly.

The LEGAL PERSON has Your Name but in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS.

The LEGAL PERSON is your STRAWMAN.

Legally, since Your birth, the STRAWMAN has been considered a debt slave.

Under such a fraudulent arrangement, You volunteer to take responsibility for the STRAWMAN.

The STRAWMAN is under government jurisdiction.

You are not under government jurisdiction, unless You volunteer to answer for the STRAWMAN by foolishly representing the STRAWMAN (YOURSELF) in court.

When You distinguish yourself as another party than the STRAWMAN, the two are separated.

You can distinguish yourself from the STRAWMAN in ONE DAY FLAT by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with a Security Agreement .

Filing a UCC-1 Financing Statesment does 3 things for You.
a) - First, gain limited control over the funds in the account. This allows You to also move entries, figures, & digits for Your benefit.

b) You can become the holder in due course of the STRAWMAN.

c) - You have a $100 BILLION DOLLAR LIEN on the STRAWMAN (the lien is the thing)

The filing the UCC-1 Financing Statement gives You virtual ownership of the STRAWMAN.

You hold the claim, the superior claim, if any Government or CORPORATION wants to lien your STRAWMAN, they must pay your claim off first.