Must Know Information,please forward...




All tradable Securities must be assigned a CUSIP NUMBER before it can be offered to investors.  Birth Certificates and Social Security Applications are converted into Government Securities; assigned a CUSIP NUMBER; grouped into lots and then are marketed as a Mutual Fund Investment.  Upon maturity, the profits are moved into a GOVERNMENT CESTA QUE TRUST and if you are still alive, the certified documents are reinvested.  It is the funds contained in this CESTA QUE TRUST that the Judge, Clerk and County Prosecutor are really after or interested in!  This Trust actually pays all of your debts but nobody tells you that because the Elite consider those assets to be their property and the Federal Reserve System is responsible for the management of those Investments.

Social Security; SSI; SSD; Medicare and Medicaid are all financed by the Trust.  The government makes you pay TAXES and a potion of your wages supposedly to pay for these services, which they can borrow at any time for any reason since they cannot access the CESTA QUE TRUST to finance their Wars or to bail out Wall Street and their patron Corporations.

The public is encouraged to purchase all kinds of insurance protection when the TRUST actually pays for all physical damages; medical costs; new technology and death benefits.  The hype to purchase insurance is a ploy to keep us in poverty and profit off our stupidity because the Vatican owns the controlling interest in all Insurance Companies.

You may receive a monthly statement from a Mortgage Company; Loan Company or Utility Company, which usually has already been paid by the TRUST.  Almost all of these corporate businesses double dip and hope that you have been conditioned well enough by their Credit Scams, to pay them a second time.  Instead of paying that Statement next time, sign it approved and mail it back to them.  If they then contact you about payment, ask them to send you a TRUE BILL instead of a Statement and you will be glad to pay it?  A Statement documents what was due and paid, whereas a TRUE BILL represents only what is due.  Banks and Utility Companies have direct access into these Cesta Que Trusts and all they needed was your name; social security number and signature.



Your birth certificate was made into a bond,its worth billions!


When the UNITED STATES declared bankruptcy, pledged all Americans as collateral against the national debt, and confiscated all gold, eliminating the means by which you could pay, it also assumed legal responsibility for providing a new way for you to pay, and it did that by providing what is known as the Exemption, an exemption from having to pay for anything. In practical terms, though, this meant giving each American something to pay with, and that \"something\" is your credit.

Your value to society was then and still is calculated using actuarial tables and at birth, bonds equal to this \"average value\" are created. I understand that this is currently between one and two million dollars. These bonds are collateralized by your birth certificate which becomes a negotiable instrument. The bonds are hypothecated, traded until their value is unlimited for all intents and purposes, and all that credit created is technically and rightfully yours. In point of fact, you should be able to go into any store in America and buy anything and everything in sight, telling the clerk to charge it to your Exemption account, which is identified by a nine-digit number that you will recognize as your Social Security number without the dashes. It is your EIN, which stands for Exemption Identification Number.



This statement is NOT A BILL!


This explanation is proposing a much-needed paradigm shift in our mind regarding the bills we receive in the mail from corporations, including the United States Corporation.

If everything commercial is a Trust since 1933 because lawful money was taken out of
circulation, then a “Bill” cannot be a Bill. They cannot be charging anyone for anything since they know we have no money to pay for anything. Checks and all liability currency are promises to pay , and essentially are a dishonor because payment is delayed . 

However, in commerce, this MIS-TAKE can be forgiven.So, then what is a “Bill”? Logically, it must be a request for us to authorize the release of assets held in trust by the Trustee as the payment (asset/credit – liability/debit = 0). This “payment by EQUITABLE TITLE TRANSFER”results in the extinguishment of debt! Notice that the amount on the bill is a positive number - a CREDIT. It does not have parentheses around it, or a minus sign in front of it, which commonly indicates a negative number.

This positive number represents an asset that will offset a liability held by the corporation for a commercial transaction. They just need our authorization (endorsement on the back of the bill)to get ownership of that asset amount so that they can then apply it to discharge the liability on their books for that same amount. 

We have the equitable title to that amount.
When we indorse the back of a Bill, then the legal and equitable titles to the asset (credit) are now vested in that one piece of paper , and when that indorsed instrument is returned to the party that sent it, then that party is now the Holder in due course of the legal and equitable titles to both the asset and liability amounts for that account and must then EXTINGUISH the debt by operation of law.The Corporation is already holding both legal and equitable titles to the Liability .

They are also holding the legal title to the Asset as implied by them sending you the Bill (the US Corp and all their sub-corps hold legal title to all assets since 1933 and are Trustees, or agents thereof, per the purpose and intent of the HJR 192,June 5, 1933 TRUST , codified in 31 USC 5118). The only thing they are missing is the Equitable title to the Asset so that they can finally do the discharge to balance the books and extinguish the debt. They have the charge (DEBIT/DEBT) amount – they just need the discharge (CREDIT/ASSET) amount to balance the books to zero.
Having both of the titles for the asset/credit amount now allows them to use that asset/credit amount to perform their duty as Trustee to extinguish (discharge) the Liability/Debit (debt) amount by operation of law –the trust laws that are invoked when the legal and equitable titles are merged.So The Bill is NOT a BILL – it is an asset credit voucher containing the credit amount that we must release to the Trustee (or agent thereof)by indorsing the back of the Bill and returning it. This is the duty that the beneficiaries (or agents thereof) have been failing to perform.

The Commercial Lien Strategem.

Faced with corrupt lawyers and judges, no litigant can expect to win in court by simply
playing defense. To beat them, you must be able to scare them. You must be able to make
them respect you, and that means you must be able to take the offense — attack them
personally.





Unfortunately, judges, lawyers, and other government officials enjoy various levels of
personal immunity provided by both law and "professional courtesy." How do you sue a
lawyer for malpractice? You hire another lawyer — if you can find one who’ ll take the
case. How do you sue an IRS agent for violating your Constitutional rights? Only with
great difficulty. How you sue a judge for railroading you in court? You don ’ t.
As a practical matter, private citizens can’ t sue the President of the United States, a
Governor, judge, or even an IRS agent for failing to obey or enforce the laws. If we try to
sue in court to compel our government officials to obey the law and perform their lawful
duties, the judges routinely ignore our petitions and laugh us out of court.
Because legal and de facto immunities shield government personnel from being sued for
committing crimes against the People, the public is legally disarmed, unable to
aggressively sue the government or its agents and compel them to obey the Law. As a
result, the public’ s legal posture is fundamentally defensive: we try to duck, dodge, and
hide in legal loopholes to defend ourselves against the government and the courts. We try
to escape, evade, and avoid, but we seldom counter -attack against our antagonists, largely
because we think there are no lawful weapons to do so. However, it appears that a
powerful offensive legal weapon may now have been discovered, tested, and proven for
common Citizens — the commercial lien. We don’t try to sue a government official for
failing to perform his lawful duties. Instead, we simply file a lien that encumbers the
official’ s personal property and credit rating like a ton of bricks until he voluntarily
satisfies our demand to perform his lawful duty, and we, in turn, voluntarily agree to
excise the lien.
Example 1 — Edward J. Wagner, an hourly, unionized employee at General Electric,
received Notices of Levy from the IRS, garnishing his wages and moneys received from
several other sources. Wagner tried to persuade G.E. not to honor the Notices, since they
were not properly attested as "true bills of commerce." His efforts met with no success.
After giving G.E. proper Notice and Demand, Wagner and his wife filed a Commercial
Lien in the amount of $224,640,00.00. In the lien, Wagner impounded G.E. inventory
that he had worked on (including air conditioning units, analyzing equipment, etc.) as
security for the lien. This is similar t o an auto mechanic impounding a car he had repaired
("mechanic’ s lien"). This meant that G.E. could not lawfully sell or transfer the
equipment until the lien was either extinguished or satisfied.
Among the reasons for the high dollar amount are that the law allows for such high sums
as rewards for damages incurred, and it generally has to be large enough in relation to the
size of the company involved, to get its attention. Otherwise such a large company might
just ignore it.
Consequently, a legal war followed, and by June of ’ 92, G.E. had gone to court several
times trying to remove Wagner’s lien, all without any real success. This was in spite of
the fact that G.E. had the best, most highly paid, and highly motivated lawyers.
In June of ’ 92, the first major victory for the Wagners came. The IRS issued four
different official Releases of Levy, one to General Electric, plus three other places where
they had wages and income that the IRS had levied — the Port of Seattle, Dean Witter
Reynolds, and Ohio State Life Insurance Company. These effectively released the IRS ’ s
attachment on the Wagners ’ income and assets. That’ s a pretty solid testimonial to the
power of the arguments in Mr. Wagner’s lien.


Although this lien strategy is explosive, it ’ s more like nitro-glycerin than hydrogen
bombs. You need to be knowledgeable and careful to use nitro -glycerin, but you don’ t
need to be a nuclear physicist. However, nitro -glycerin can blow up in your face if you
handle it carelessly!
Likewise, "bombing" government officials with liens is a craft, not a science, that can be
used as easily by knowledgeable pro se’ s as it can by lawyers and legal scholars. The
commercial lien is simple, inexpensive, and takes very little time. It requires no court
action or judge’ s approval. And, it has proven to be very direct and effective, if it is
handled correctly. However, a few careless pro se’ s have had their liens "blow up" in
their faces, so be meticulous when you use them.

COMMERCIAL LIEN MANUAL INCLUDED IN SECURED PARTY CREDITOR PROCESS PACK.


YOUR SIGNATURE IS YOUR MOST VALUABLE PROPERTY!





Your property is pledged for the rest of your life upon your signature and your promise to
perform is pledged into perpetual debt. The bankers don't even bother to go to court They leave
it up to the agencies to administer the agency corporate public policy. It is the public policy of
that agency to bill you on your promise to perform. If you don't pay, they follow up on the public
policy on notice of default and give you one more chance to pay. Then they proceed to sell the
property at a tax auction. They never go to court or appear in court to back up their claim
against you. Did any of your government licensed and controlled teachers ever stress that your
signature is your most valuable personal property? Did your government teachers ever tell you
that any time you sign any document, you should sign it "without prejudice," or with "All Rights
Reserved" above your signature. This means you are reserving your God given unalienable rights
which cannot be transferred and all other rights for which your forefathers died.

The Corporate U.S.. Government provides, or at best pretends to provide for this reservation of
rights under the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 1-207 and 1-103. You need more information
in this area. It is not in the best interest of the United States Corporate "PUBLIC" schools to
teach you about their bankruptcy proceedings and how they have set the snare to Compel you
into paying their debt. The Corporate "PUBLIC" schools are strictly designed for their
Corporate citizen/subjects. That is. the Corporate U.S.. Public School citizens.

Notice all the emphases on being a "good" Citizen. Basically all their teachers and their students
are trained to produce labor and material in exchange for valueless green paper called "money."
It is not money, it functions "AS" money. Lawful money must be backed by something of value.
Bankers take your labor, services, and material (homes, cars, farms, etc.) in exchange for their
valueless corporate paper. This paper is backed only by the "full faith and Confidence of the
United States Government" THE MOTHER CORPORATION.

I do not have faith or confidence in the U.S. BANKRUPT CORPORATE GOVERNMENT
ADMINISTRATORS WHO HAVE PERVERTED THEIR Constitutional CHARTER, enslaving
the sovereign American people into their bankruptcy obligations. Their fraudulent money
laundering process promotes your payment on the corporate government's bankruptcy debt. This
debt is mathematically impossible to pay Off. You and your family are in continual financial
bondage to the international bankers. They love it so!

Black's Law Dictionary 1990, defines "Money Changers" as: .....business of a banker... today
handled by the international departments of banks." Let me think for a moment, what did Christ
do to the Money Changers." Oh, Yes, he severely interfered with their activity. Three days later
he was crucified. Lincoln was killed for interfering with the money changers. Kennedy was
slaughtered for interfering with the money changers.

Let's return to the subject of your property, and the tax sale for not paying property taxes. In this
situation under a standard deed (not common law deed) you are actually in default. Not because
you understand the default or you like being in default, you just are in default of the tax
payment. So they put your property up for sale. At the tax sale, Joe Doe, average American, bids
on your property and gets it. Now, there is a procedure he must go through step by step to
establish. He is required to give you another chance. You have six months and a day to pay off the
default. If, at this time, you pay off the amount the county says you owe, plus penalties, interest,
fines, etc., then your property is taken off default status and it is yours to continue to pay taxes on
the next year.


Traffic Ticket (Nearly any charging instrument can be handled this way.)



NOTICE:  When a petition for abatement is before a court, that court is charged with according to the petitioner to the advantage if there is doubt on the part of the court.  In addition, courts should take cognizance of the law that provides:  Where conditions for its issuance exist, abatement is a matter of right, not of discretion.  The misnomer or mis-description of a party defendant is ground for abatement, and grounds for abatements are the same for equity and law cases.

Also, please note that the abatement does not preclude petitioners remedies and relief available under any law forum for the injury and damages incurred by false accusations from corporate officers, and the like.


 Demonstrating Competence in Commerce.



(These events occurred on Dec. 10, 2016 A.D. in the Municipal Court for the City of Tumwater, Washington.  Prior to entering the Court, Our Man has written on the face of the ticket "Refused for Cause without Dishonor, Abandoned Paper and Fraudulent Commercial Claim".  The ticket was returned to the Clerk of the Court within 72 hours of being issued.  About 10 days later, Our Man received a Notice of Mitigation Hearing regarding this matter for the stated date.  Our Man then put in a one page Notice and Demand for Abatement.  No other actions were taken prior to going into court.  I have changed only the name of Our Man.  All other information is true and correct as best as I know.)
Judge Lyman:  The case of JOHN HENRY SMITH.
(Our Man walks up to the Defendant's Lectern and starts shuffling his papers.  The Judge has a large pile of papers in his hand.  Probably 30 to 40 pages of paper.  Now Our Man has not put any of this in the case.  Hmmmm.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
(Our Man doesn't answer but continues to sort his papers.)
Judge Lyman:  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?  (A little emphasis on the question.)
Our Man:  Is this being recorded?
Judge Lyman:  Yes.  Are you JOHN HENRY SMITH?
Our Man:  If I may read my statement, I think it will become clear.
Judge Lyman:  O.K., go ahead.
Our Man:  I am John Henry of the family Smith.  I am here today to settle this matter.
Regarding Number TPD7Y2231291 I'm here today, appearing specially and not generally, to abate the matter of a worthless security interest known as a UCC-1 commercial lien in the form of a "TRAFFIC INFRACTION" against the Federal Reserve account in the name of JOHN HENRY SMITH, a decedent.  Said worthless security interest was created by an employee of CITY OF TUMWATER who identified himself as Jon Weiks #0032 on October 29, 2007, a mere pirate operating under color of law, who on said date and with subterfuge attempted to attach private copyrighted dead man statutes to me, a living Man, for the express purpose of stealing my sweat equity .  I then exercised my Right of Avoidance to this offered commercial venture by returning this abandoned and defective paper for cause without dishonor to Sheryle Wyatt or her agent on October 31, 2007.  This was clearly a case of mistaken identity as the charged entity is a decedent under Title 26 USC and not me and this is the basis upon which I move for abatement.

"Sir, are you prepared to abate this matter now?"
(It would be helpful to know, that Our Man is about 6'5" tall and speaks rather slowly in a monotone voice;  totally unthreatening in his demeanor.)
Judge Lyman:  NO!

Our Man:      I will then continue my statement as follows: Let the record reflect that J.V. Lyman has denied the Principal's motion for abatement.  My rejection of the offer made by CITY OF TUMWATER to raid the Decedent's estate,  one JOHN HENRY SMITH, should have ended the matter, however, apparently this private commercial trading company known as "CITY OF TUMWATER/MUNICIPAL COURT DUNNS # 03-851-7355, SIC # 91110201, Cage Code # 1T9M3", a store front masquerading as an office in the judicial branch of Government and operating under the Department of Defense, is hell bent for it's own personal gain on probating the estate of JOHN HENRY SMITH, of which I am the Owner and Principal.  For the record, I object to the probating of said estate and do not give my permission thereto.  I am here today for the express purpose of establishing my Right of Avoidance if anyone should attempt to impose a Claim of Distress against the person of my collateral.  Any outcome on this matter other than an outright abatement or a check written to me for certified funds today assuming the transfer of funds has already taken place, will result in a Demand to the DTCC (Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation) for Investigation of Fraud on the TRAFFIC INFRACTION, a fraudulent
security.
I now ask you the following:
Does the prosecutor have a 1099OID in regard to the "charge"?
Judge Lyman:  There is no Prosecutor here.
Does the clerk?
(Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.)
I've got my claim here…where is yours?
(Again Judge Lyman doesn't answer.  Just stares at Our Man.
Our Man holds up his IRS forms 706, 709, and 1099OID.)
Tell me, Sir, who the payor is and also who the recipient of the funds is.

If you're the recipient, then I guess you'll be paying the transfer taxes on this charitable contribution from the Decedent's estate which you are attempting to probate here.  We both know that if you haven't paid the tax, you have no claim in Equity.

ARE YOU READY NOW, SIR, TO ABATE THIS MATTER?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's question and continues on.)
Sir, have you paid the taxes?
Judge Lyman:  Do you have any evidence that the Defendant is deceased?
Sir, have you already probated this estate behind my back?
Under 26 USC 2002 you are personally liable for payment as the executor defined under 2203 because you have actual or constructive possession of the property.
Judge Lyman:  It sounds like you would like this matter mitigated.  I am going to read the Officer's affidavit into the record.  (The Judge proceeds to read about a 5 page Affidavit from the Officer.  The Officer covered just about everything possible except counting the dents and scratches on Our Man's car.  Amazingly complete.)
Judge Lyman:  I can't determine from the Officers Affidavit whether you committed an infraction of the Law or not.  I am dismissing this matter.
(Our Man doesn't even seem to notice the Judge's and continues reading his script into the record.)
Sir, have you already taken a charitable contribution from my estate to fund your purchase of private equities in mutual funds?

Sir, have you already submitted a 1099R for that purpose?
If you've acquired funds from the decedent's estate that makes you a qualified heir and not paying the taxes makes the property you stole contraband which means all the forfeiture statutes kick in.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case.
(Our Man just keeps on reading.)
Unless you abate this matter here and now OR give me a check for the funds you stole, I will be alerting the Criminal Investigation Division of the IRS that you are guilty of tax evasion and money laundering and to start an investigation on you personally with regards to my estate.
Judge Lyman:  I have dismissed this case!  (The Judge is turning red and sweating).
(Our Man just walks up to the lady acting like a Clerk and hands her all his IRS forms and leaves.  The Judge is visibly shaken by the whole matter.)


Who died before they collected Social Security?


KEEP PASSING THIS AROUND UNTIL EVERYONE HAS HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO READ IT.THIS IS SURE SOMETHING TO THINK ABOUT!THE ONLY THING WRONG WITH THE GOVERNMENT'S CALCULATION OF AVAILABLE SOCIAL SECURITY IS THEY FORGOT TO FIGURE IN THE PEOPLE WHO DIED BEFORE THEY EVER COLLECTED A SOCIAL SECURITY CHECK!WHERE DID THAT MONEY GO?


Remember, not only did you and I contribute to Social Security but your employer did too.
It totaled 15% of your income before taxes.
If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that's close to $220,500.
Read that again.
Did you see where the Government paid in one single penny?
We are talking about the money you and your employer put in a government bank to insure you and I, that we would have a retirement check from the money we put in, not the Government.
Now they are calling the money we put in an entitlement when we reach the age to take it back.
If you calculate the future invested value of $4,500 per year (yours & your employer's contribution) at a simple 5% interest (less than what the Government pays on the money that it borrows).
After 49 years of working you'd have $892,919.98. If you took out only 3% per year, you'd receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you're 95 if you retire at age 65) and that's with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit!
If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you'd have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month.

THE FOLKS IN WASHINGTON HAVE PULLED OFF A BIGGER PONZI SCHEME THAN BERNIE MADOFF EVER DID.

Entitlement my foot; I paid cash for my social security insurance!
Just because they borrowed the money for other government spending, doesn't make my benefits some kind of charity or handout!!
Remember Congressional benefits?
--- free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days.
Now that's welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security retirement payments entitlements?
They call Social Security and Medicare an entitlement even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives, and now, when it's time for us to collect, the government is running out of money.
Why did the government borrow from it in the first place?
It was supposed to be in a locked box, not part of the general fund.
Sad isn't it?
99% of people won't have the guts to SHARE this.
I'm in the 1%

I JUST DID!


All U.S. Prisons Are Debtors Prisons

Issuing bonds for profit on prisoners has finally been deciphered.
Why do we have a rise in prosecution for non-violent crimes?
As soon as your social security number hits the system, there is
Someone is buying a bond in your name that accrues interest the longer you
Sit in jail.. 


The courts are operating under Statute Law. A “Statute” is defined in
BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY, FOURTH EDITION REVISED as a kind of
Bond or obligation of record, being an abbreviation for “statute
Merchant” or “statute staple.”

Statute –merchant = is defined as a security for a debt acknowledged
to be due, entered into before the chief magistrate of some trading
town, pursuant to the statute 13 Edward I. De Mercatoribus, by which
not only the body of the debtor might be imprisoned, and his goods
seized in satisfaction of the debt, but also his lands might be delivered
to the creditor till out of the rents and profits of them the debt be
satisfied.

The Grand Jury Foreman is the Drawer or Maker of the Indictment by
his signature, the Defendant/Debtor or Straw-man is the Drawee and
the State is the Payee and the live Man or Woman is the Payor. What
they are doing in the courtroom is all commercial, and is in conformity
to 27 CFR 72.11, where it says all Crimes are commercial. What the
judge and prosecutor are doing in the courtroom is making a
commercial presentment under section 3-501 (1) “Unless excused
(section 3-511) presentment is necessary to charge secondary parties as follows”:
(a) Presentment for acceptance is necessary to charge the drawer and
endorsers of a draft where the draft so provides, or is payable
elsewhere than at the residence or place of business of the drawee, or
its date of payment depends upon such presentment. The holder may
at his option present for acceptance any other draft payable at a stated
date;
(b) presentment for payment is necessary to charge any endorser;
(c) in the case of any drawer, the acceptor of a draft payable at a bank
or the maker of a note payable at a bank, presentment for payment is
necessary, but failure to make presentment discharges such drawer,
acceptor or maker only as stated in section 3-502 (1)(B).
If you don’t accept the charge or presentment you are in dishonor for
no acceptance under 3-505 of the U.C.C. (c) and 3-501 (2) (a), (b).
Acceptance is the drawer’s signed engagement to honor the draft as
presented. It must be written on the draft, and may consist of his
signature alone. It becomes operative when completed by delivery or
notification 3-410 of the U.C.C.
You are the Fiduciary Trustee of the Straw-man which is a cesti que
UNITED STATES TRUST; in this capacity you have the responsibility to
discharge all his debts, by operation of law. You are also the principal
or asset holder on the private side of the accounting ledger; you are
holding the Exemption necessary to discharge the debt. When they
monetize debt they have to have a principal, capital and interest is what
circulates as principal and is called revenue or re-venue. Principal is
where venue lies. When you are in dishonor they cannot use your
exemption to pass the debt or charge through your account to obtain a
discharge, so they sell your dishonor, which has a commercial value of $1,000,000 dollars for each count. When Social Security # is assigned or a Blank Bond is issued and when you are imprisoned the Bond is filled out. This Bond is called a Bid Bond, Standard Form 24 (REV. 10-98)
prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) § 53.228(a). This is also called a Prison
Bond. These are also referred to as Contract Surety Bonds. The First, the
Bid Bond, provides financial assurance that the bid has been submitted
in good faith and that the contractor intends to enter into the contract
at the price bid and provide the required performance and payment
bonds. The Second, the Performance Bond, protects the obligee from
financial loss should the contractor fail to perform the contract in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract documents.
The Third kind of Contract Bond is the Payment Bond which guarantees
that the contractor will pay certain subcontractor, labor and material
bills associated with the project.
On April 9, 2002 (12:18 pm) Lehman Brothers Banking Cartel in New
York City agreed to provide prison industry leader CCA (Corrections
Corporation of America) with a new $ 695.0 million senior secured
credit facility, to be combined with a $150 million notes offering. The
war on terrorism has created a buzz in the private prison industry. Less
than three weeks after September 11th, a New York Post story on the
for-profit private prison industry stated, “America’s new wall of
homeland security is creating a big demand for cells to hold suspects
and illegal aliens who might be rounded up.” In order to prosper, prison
operators need to maintain a steady flow of prisoners and prison
dollars.
The Corrections Corporation of America owns most of your prison
systems and sells its stock and shares on the New York Stock Exchange,
the major stock holder is the Paine Webber Group.There is also a Prison Realty Trust [PZN], which is a real estate investment trust [REIT] and is
the world’s largest private sector owner and developer.
Prisons are nothing but warehouses for the storage of goods and
chattel under commercial law. The Warden is a Bailee or Warehouseman
[before the term Admiral was used he was called Custos Maris “Warden
of the Sea”] [In some ancient records He was called Capitanus
Maritimarum or “Captain or Tenant in Chief of the Maritime”] who
receives personal property from another as Bailment. The Bailer is one
who provides bail as a surety for a criminal defendant’s release.
When your dishonor is sold within the United States it has a six digit
accounting # and is called a Cardinal Number, when it is sold at the
International Level it goes Ordinance or Military and uses a nine digit
accounting number. This is where AutoTRIS and CUSIP come in.
AutoTRIS is the Automated Forensic Traces Investigation System and
was designed in the Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science using a
graphical toolkit that was developed at Automation Designs &
Solutions, Inc. for other software products.
Why is privatizing prisons so appealing to Federal, State, and Local
governments? As the Nation put it: The selling point was simple: Private
companies could build and run prisons cheaper that the governments.
Unfettered American Capitalism would produce a better fetter, saving
cash-strapped states millions of dollars each year” while simultaneously
generating huge profits. The Nation explains this miracle would be
accomplished. “Private prisons receive a guaranteed [per diem] fee for
each prisoner, regardless of the actual costs. Each dime they don’t
spend on food or medical care [for prisoners] or on wages and training
for the guards is a dime they can pocket.” Most guards in public prisons
belong to the LEOU, which is part of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees AFSCME. I have a pointed question for you, why aren’t we as principals on the Private side of the accounting cycle using our Exemption Priority to discharge all this Public Debt under the Uniform Exemption Act section 3 “Exempt”means protected, and “exemption” means protection, from subjection to a judicial lien, process, or proceeding to collect a debt. The answer is
we are all double-minded and do not know who we are in a commercial setting. Every individual in Prison is in there, because of Commercial Dishonor.And this is why we now have a full scale tornado of new statutes and codes  ie.patriot act(for patriots) and the ndaa etc for the us citizen chattel slaves to conform to,but its not that easy anymore for you see everything on the US plantation is going to be illegal,and this is being done to pay back the international bankers who are the executors of the US corporations bankruptcy. 




 

Checks on Closed Accounts.






In return for the loans from the people, the UNITED STATES keeps track of these loans from the people by tracking the "contributions" of the strawmen- i.e. the corporate shadows of the people, by way of what the UNITED STATES calls the Social Security Number accounts. Since all donations (or loans) of commercial assets from the people to the UNITED STATES are accounted for by way of the SSN accounting, the UNITED STATES knows at any one time how much it owes the ultimate creditors, the living people. Most people believe that the SSN was created to enslave the people by making them takers of benefits. This is false (unless you want it to be true and demand benefits from the UNITED STATES). Everything from the BANKRUPT public under public policy and not under public law is told to us in reverse or backwards. The creation of the SSN accounts was not to make us a nation of slaves. It was to allow the government to take our commercial energy and use it to run the nation, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. The government needed to account for how much commercial energy it owed each and everyone of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. Therefore, the SSN was to track our claims against the UNITED STATES. We are the creditors and they are the debtor. Therefore, we have a pre-paid account with the UNITED STATES since we are the creditors and it is the debtor.



The CAFR accounting is the summary results of this accounting of keeping track of the people's contributions and earnings on those contributions. There are two accounts. The one account is the accounting of the first tier contributions. This is the property contributed to the UNITED STATES from the people of the states by way of the acts of the governors of the states in March of 1933. The larger asset account is most likely the earnings off of the commercial investment of the assets contributed to the first account. This second dealing with the investment earnings is most likely a tontine account belonging to the people, as long as they are alive to claim it. After their death, their share of this account is probably estopped with their probate.



Living people loan or contribute credits to the UNITED STATES when they own property and register it, or when they have income and file a tax return. You are in commerce when you have income (i.e.- you sell the labor of the living man for private money) or when you are an "owner" of registered property. Title 31 United States Code §3124 is interesting. It is titled "Exemption from Taxation." This statute says in effect that you are not exempt from taxation under Title 26 of the United States Code if you sell your labor or if you own property that is registered to any state or the united states. Notice that Title 31 of the United States Code is the laws concerning "money". Since there is no public law money now, and only private money of the private Federal Reserve Bank, then there is no ability to purchase any titles to any property anymore. Since there is no ability to purchase titles to property anymore with the private Federal Reserve Notes, then one's "ownership" or property or the sale of one's labor for private "money" has no lawful title transferred in the exchange. Therefore one is always dealing with a "federal" property right in any "ownership" or in any "sale of labor for ‘money". Since one is dealing in a property right of Congress (since they enfranchised the Federal Reserve Bank), then one who sells his labor for "money" or owns property is nothing more than a tenant on the federal feudal plantation and is NOT tax exempt from the statutes of Title 26 mentioned in Title 31 §3124 and being outside the exemption. The tax is the rent for the use of the federal feudal property held by the UNITED STATES in trust for the people and franchised to the federal 14th amendment fictions and corporations to raise a revenue for the democracy.



There is a court case that says the same thing. It is backward to reality, but the truth is there anyway. The agents of the court speak as the agents of YHWH to His people, if they will listen. Scripture says in 1 Cor 13:12: For Now [in the later days] we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part: but then shall I know even as also I am known,' The "glass" is a mirror that inverts the direction from left to right. "Darkly" is the modifier that suggests that the image from the mirror is not easily discernible even when it is in reverse. The Court case is from the UNITED STATES Supreme Court. "If the nation [the man] comes down from its [his] position of sovereignty and enters the domain of commerce, it [he] submit itself [himself] to the same laws that govern individuals therein. It [he] assumes the position of an ordinary citizen and it [he] cannot recede from the fulfillment of its [his] obligations;" 74 Fed. Rep. 145, following 91 U.S. 398. Notice that the words in the brackets have been added by the writer. It is not in the original decision. This case was a commercial case in which the sovereignty of the United States was draw into question. The Supreme Court said that when a sovereign goes into a commercial relationship with private money [not lawful money of account], it looses its sovereignty. The Supreme Court was telling you that we all lost our sovereignty in 1933 when we went into commerce with private FRN's that did not secure title to the goods purchased. Title remained with the "state" under the principle of escheat. The only way to remain sovereign is to be out of commercial activity.



It is interesting that there is something called a COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY EXCEPTION. Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh, states: the - term "commercial-activity exception means: "An exemption from the rule of sovereign immunity, permitting a claim against a foreign state if the claim arises from private acts undertaken by the foreign state, as opposed to the state's public acts." Isn't this definition exactly what we said above. If you are in commerce since 1933, you are not a sovereign. You are not free. Prior to 1933, you could perform a "public act" of "paying" for goods and services with lawful money of account. In 1933 that "public act" was suspended by federal public policy of the bankruptcy. Now all one can do is to use a "private act" of discharging your debt with FRN's, which are not a money and do not purchase a title for the goods and services you bought. Therefore, none of your acts are cloaked with the protection of a "sovereign" anymore. You lost your presumption of "sovereignty" because of your participation in private commercial activity.



Let me put this a different way. It comes out the same in the end. The UNITED STATES has been bankrupt from the beginning. It has only been in various stages of bankruptcy going from bad to worse. The Constitution was the first indicator. If you look up the word "constitution", it will give you all kinds of comfy-cozy stuff. It will make you feel good about this "founding document". If you look up the word "constitutor" you will get a changed opinion. A "constitutor" is one who passes on his debts to another by way of the constitution he writes, so it was with the UNITED STATES. It owed the debts of the Revolutionary War back in the 1770's. The States would not tax themselves to pay these debts. Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, borrowed money from the international bankers to pay these war debts. The Constitution was the means of getting the States to coinsure the UNITED STATES in order to get an extension in paying back the loan to the creditors at the end of the 1780's. The States became endorsers and co-sureties on the national loan. This cosurety was called in in 1933 when the assets of the States were turned over to the UNITED STATES to help discharge the bankruptcy. This was done because of the Constitution of the United States and pursuant thereto.



If you do not believe this, then I will give you another issue to consider. There is a principle called the Rule of 93. It relates to the Rule of 1793 under International Law. "Where a commerce which had previously been considered a monopoly is thrown open, in times of war, to all nations, by a general regulation neutrals have no right to avail themselves of the concession, and their entrance on such trade is a breach of the impartiality they are bound to observe." 2 Halleck, mt. L. 302. This rule came into existence between the Treaties of 1783 and 1794, more commonly termed the Treaty of Peace and the Jay Treaty. The first Treaty of Peace signed in July 16, 1792 recognized the debt that Congress had with the bankers of the Crown of England payable by Jan. 1, 1788, but defaulted on by Congress. This Rule of 93 states that anyone who acts in a commercial manner with one who is a debtor to another, is no longer a neutral party and stands in the place of the debtor.



This is the source of our problem today, people. The UNITED STATES and all the states are codebtors to the bankers. We, the people, were never linked directly with the obligation to discharge the debt. But when we go into a commercial activity with private "money" with the debtors the UNITED STATES and the territorial Buck Act States, then we are no longer neutral, under law, and we have come into breach of the impartiality in the commercial relationship between the UNITED STATES and its Buck Act States and the international creditor banks. By our co-commercial activity under private acts of commerce by using private credit and debt, we have become the debtors by our actions. The only solution is to get out of commerce with private federal "money".



This is where the "closed check" account becomes interesting. When the account is closed, one can access the asset side of the admiralty-maritime pre-paid account. If one cannot access the asset side, then one cannot acquire the right of the creditor to the action. The liability side is the evidence of a debt. A debtor has no remedy in an action. Dealing with open checking accounts is reserved is for "dead" entities who have no original energy. If you are a living soul, you are the source of the energy used by commerce. You are the creditor or the principle.



There is NO MONEY. It was discontinued by an act of Congress in 1933. All we have is the PROMISE to deliver money, if and when it is ever restored, which President Johnson said would never be restored again. If you believe that there is money, then you are a fool and live in a fiction as a lunatic. There are things that some people want you to believe is used "as a money". If money existed, you would not need to have "notes" and promises to pay money. How can the promise to pay money be the money you think you are getting?



The long and short is simple. You never PAY anyone any money. You hand them a due bill to promise to pay them something which does not now exist and to which those in power will not sanction. The reason is simple. If you do not have money, you can not acquire a title to any property. Therefore, all property rests in the hands of the fictitious state which owns everything and you must get permission from the state to do whatever you desire to do. This is called a democracy which is run on the commercial principles of socialism [or communism]. We, as a nation, were taken over in March, 1933, and not one citizen or slave was the wiser and objected. But who cares? The reason was stated in Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26.



The reason for our nation's current condition is not relevant to this discussion. We are interested in the problem of the woman, who in the start of this article, was involved with a visit from the FBI to inquire about why she was using closed checks on a closed checking account.



A closed account in a bank is one which allows one to go back to draft the UNITED STATES to protest the lack of remedy to the loss of Constitutional money. It requests the use of "public" policy to remedy your loss of lawful money as a living people and as a creditor of the commercial bankruptcy. By drafting with a closed account check, used in a proper manner, one can notice the Secretary of the Treasury that you request a "public act" of settlement of an account someone might charge you with under "private acts" of public policy. Using the closed check properly actually puts one in harmony with the principles of HJR 192 as set forth by Congress in 1933 as the remedy for the "creditors", or we the people. You are NOT using the closed check to purchase anything. There is no money. You are involved in an exchange. An exchange is an action between two parties where goods or services are neither bought or sold and are not gifted. Remember, there is a tax or a lawful penalty on gifting or buying and selling when the commercial system is run under foreign private acts or laws. This is the penalty stated in the Rule of 1793 whereby traders in commerce with the debtors are also treated like the debtors and lose all titles and property rights not granted by letters of Marquee (licenses and registrations), to which the party in commerce never has lawful title. He is merely a beneficiary to an implied trust with the "state" as the lawful trustee with the right of control.



When the woman in our example used a closed account check to tender a charge, she was not paying the charge. There is no money. It is a fiction and illusion to assume there is. She was merely telling the so called charging party that if they want to believe there is money, or if they want to believe that there is a charge against her straw-woman, then she will not argue with them. Why would you argue with an insane person who believes that there is money when Congress told everyone there wasn't in 1933. To argue with a lunatic who believes that there is money and that they can charge you to try to collect money which does not exist, is to become a lunatic yourself. The test in this scenario is that the controllers for the government at the high level know there is no money. They test you to see if you believe that there is still money. If you are with them that you do not owe MONEY, then you are the one who raised the factual issue of MONEY, and you must be a lunatic. Their judgments against you for money is another test to see if they can appease you, since you obviously think money exists.



So lets figure this out. If you argue about a debt payable in money, such as a civil or criminal charge against you, then you are a lunatic since you appear to believe that money exists, which since 1933 is not true. You must be crazy. If you "accept" any alleged charges that they imply are related to money [like civil and criminal charges and other commercial presentments], and you never raise the issue of money at all, since it is a fiction and illusion and you do not deal with, talk about, or argue things that are illusions and fictions, then you pass the test from the public, and you just might escape any serious judgments for criminal or civil liabilities that will be thrown at your strawman.



The way that you get out of commerce and do not use money is to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to offset and adjust any charges against your strawman by the use of an "exemption" by way of a PRE-PAID account, which links back to the CAFR accounting and your share of the living man's work energy donated to the state by way of the loans of work energy and property donations through registrations by the strawman. This PRE-PAID account has no money in it currently. It was prepaid when you authorized the state to become the trustee over it as an unselfish act of honor and duty. Since the Secretary of the Treasury is the fiduciary creditor to operate that account according to your draft, the Secretary of the Treasury is the only person who could enter a Certificate of Protest to your draft instrument seeking settlement and closure of any charge that the state might bring against your strawman as a test of your competency as a sovereign. Sovereignty means to serve, not to rule.


UCC 1 Debt Elimination

On May 23, 1933, Congressman Louis T. McFadden, (R-OH) Chairman of the House Banking and Finance Committee brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. To protect themselves from these charges both the House and the Senate, on JUNE 5, 1933, passed House Joint Resolution 192. It provided that the people, who had delivered their gold to the federal government following an illegal proclamation by President Roosevelt, would be exempt from paying their debts since their means of payment, their substance, had been taken from them. HJR 192 provided a remedy for the crime.

The basis of UCC-1 debt elimination derives from HJR-192 in which the Corporate US board of directors, the Congress, removed from the flesh and blood men and women of the several united States of America their substance with which they can pay for things and replaced it with fictitious "money" in the form of debt instruments called Federal Reserve Notes. This created the exemption.

Essentially, the acceptance/redemption debt elimination process obtains access to the trust account that the federal government has been using since your birth to monetize and pay off the national debt. They automatically made the government the trustee of that account and used your energy and talent to fund the national government. With your birth certificate sent from the state in which you were born, the Department of Treasury creates a constructive trust account that permits the corporate United States and all of the other subsidiary corporations, states, counties, cities, etc. to interact with you as a corporate, fictitious entity. They are fictitious public entities that cannot interact with you, the real, living person. But they have convinced you, the living flesh and blood person that they are referring to you. You have voluntarily accommodated this interaction on behalf of your fictitious entity, your "corporation."

By filing your UCC-1 financial statement, security agreement, negotiable bill of exchange and the Federal Reserve routing numbers with the fictitious corporate government entities, you separate yourself from that accommodation and take the position as the first creditor to that debtor. The debt belongs to the Corporate You, but the real you has been making the payments. Now you will stand first in line to utilize the collateral held in your trust account by the government. Using this trust account as they have done, you can assign credit to the bank at which you, the fictitious entity, owe the debt. A simple transaction discharges that debt. Who can now complain that the debt is not satisfied? You have done what you have agreed to do, but the credit did not come from your checking account. It was a non-cash transaction in the public fiction of commerce under the Uniform Commercial Code.

In the case of mortgage elimination, the credit in your “strawman” man account is directed to redeem your note through a commercial Bill of Exchange. This credit is transferred to the bank holding your mortgage to discharge the debt. If the bank accepts this legal tender as per mortgage agreement, you request the reconveyance of the deed back to you. Should the bank refuse the offer of legal tender and will not discharge the debt, they are in dishonor by failing to perform according to the mortgage agreement. As the grantor of that mortgage you can revoke your agreement within 33 days by foreclosing on the bank. Simultaneously, you seek judicial review of the administrative procedures you have followed in accordance with pertinent statutes. Even if the judge refuses to sign the order, in 6 months it is ruled in your favor by default. Should the bank refuse to reconvey the deed, a clear title is provided by transferring the property through three trusted individuals: buyer A for $10 and consideration and after 10 days sold to buyer B for $10 and consideration for another 10 days, buyer C and finally to you for $10 and consideration for 91 days, then it is recommended that the property be sold to your asset protection program in which you are established as its beneficiary. This avoids loss of property made vulnerable to the predatory attorneys due to the new status of a property that is free and clear of debt.

Discharge Almost Any Debt with Proper Use of the UCC....

You are now officially “Dead”


We are born on the land and are considered heirs of the land assets of our country.

But within hours undeclared agents of the federal “State” franchise get our Mothers to sign Certificates of Live Birth. These documents are misrepresented as simple recordings of the baby’s birth. Instead, they are registrations of commercial “vessels” using the baby’s name, and serving to make the “State” franchise the beneficiary of the baby’s estate on the land.

However many days, weeks, or months later as determined by “State” law, your “vessel in commerce” is reported “missing, presumed dead” to the probate court, which then doctors the civil records and converts your living estate to a trust ESTATE benefiting the perpetrators of this scheme.

You are now officially “dead” with respect to the land jurisdiction and unless you take action to correct the probate court records, you and your assets are permanently trapped in the international jurisdiction of the sea. You are therefore unable to take recourse to your holdings on the land or the law forms of the land that you are owed. Ever heard the Constitution called the “Law of the Land”?

This is why your constitutional guarantees don’t apply. There’s no version of “you” operating on the land as a result of this fraud.


And it is all based on identity theft and unilateral adhesion contracts that are obtained under conditions of deceit while you are still just a baby. There’s no way that you could ever know that this was going on or have any opportunity to object to it.

You are kidnapped and press-ganged into the international jurisdiction of the sea and your ESTATE is claimed and pillaged before you leave grade school.

And the monsters doing this to you? The IMF and FEDERAL RESERVE and other criminal international banking cartels and organizations like the American Bar Association that have participated in and profited from this lurid fraud scheme.

The IMF does business as the “UNITED STATES, INC.” and has franchises doing business as the “STATE OF OHIO” and so on. These franchises are no different than the franchises of Dairy Queen, Inc.

The FEDERAL RESERVE (reconfigured as a United Nations owned and operated corporation) is doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. — they are just now setting up franchises operated simply as “OHIO” and “WISCONSIN” and so on.

None of these corporations has any lawful or even legal authority over you and your assets, but, thanks to their fraud scheme, they do have control of “your” ESTATE and now, “your” public transmitting utility which have both been created using your given name without your knowledge or permission.

JOHN QUINCY ADAMS = federal STATE estate trust owned and operated by the IMF, a UN agency dba UNITED STATES.

JOHN Q. ADAMS = federal public transmitting utility owned and operated by the new United Nation’s version of FEDERAL RESERVE doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

Isn’t it time to take back control of your property? [ . . . your flesh and blood human body and the fruits of your labor?]


NEVER CONFESS WHO YOU ARE... DEALING WITH POLICE, JUDGES, ETC.



I. Basis of Action when confronted.
Never walk into the police station or court voluntarily.  If you do you traverse and acknowledge the validity of their jurisdiction/offer.  As Lao-tzu noted 2,500 years ago: “Do not invite the fight, accept it instead.  Better a foot behind than an inch too far ahead.”  Let the offer come to you; don’t make the offer.
When you are confronted with an obligatory court appearance, keep in mind the following:
Everything is commerce/contract, being administered in a state of emergency under the war powers.  The commerce clause of the Constitution operates in the private international law merchant of the bankers to whom essentially every government in the world is bankrupt.  All of this functions in admiralty/maritime where you have no rights and the captain’s word is law.
As a result of the above condition, military war powers enforce all interstate commerce (which is everything), with draconian penalties for impeding commerce.

Because the climate in which we live is a relentless and ravenous assault from all aspects of the “government” against our commercial liability, i.e. “revenue raising,” enforced by guns, violence, and prisons, life in America a high-risk venture. It requires understanding of how to neutralize the endless barrage of attacks in the form of commercial presentments/offers.  Fighting is a no win proposition.  Matters must be neutralized, defused, and transmuted into victory without conflict.

We have no money, only private debt paper, insurance scrip (like Monopoly money or casino chips which a real monopoly has foisted on the world), operating in the bankruptcy.  Everything is commerce, which is banking, which is debt paper, which is credit/debit balances on banks’ books, which is bookkeeping.

Assets (credits) must always equal liabilities (debits).  The books must always balance for world commerce to operate.  The commercial account must be cleared within three (3) days, which is codified in the US in the Federal Truth in Lending Act, Title 12 USC § 1601, “Regulation Z.”

A traffic citation, summons, indictment, complaint, etc., is a commercial presentment.  When the presentment is issued a debt is created, a liability on the bank’s books, which must be balanced with an asset.  They want you to supply the asset in the form of paying a fine, some specific performance, or jail time.
 
Every such commercial presentment is an offer to contract, concerning which you have the following five (5) options:

1. You can deny or fight the charges and thereby traverse, enjoin the action, legitimize their cause of action, and lock yourself in to their jurisdiction.  This is a commercial dishonor.  If you enter a plea, or the judge enters one for you, you have traversed.  The only issue now is the facts (“did you or did you not run the red light?”).  In other words, dishonor submits you to a court proceeding to resolve the dispute over facts of the matter.

2. You can demur.  A demurrer accepts all alleged facts as true and raises of issues of law.  A classic example is: “Yes, I did it, but so what?  The statute of limitations has expired so issues of law foreclose all possibility for me to be prosecuted in this matter.”

3. You can stand mute, in which both the law and facts are invoked.  The judge will enter a plea for you and a court proceeding to resolve the controversy will commence.  Standing mute is also a commercial dishonor and locks you into both law and facts.

4. You can protest, such as by denying jurisdiction.  This also locks you into the requirement to proceed with the court process to resolve the dispute.

5. You can accept the offer/charges (citation, summons, complaint, indictment, etc.) for value.
Of the above options, only # 5:

1. De-fuses, i.e. dissolves, the controversy, thereby obviating all necessity or possibility for court proceedings since there is no dispute to resolve (you have “agreed with your adversary quickly while you are on the way with him”).

2. Makes you the owner of the contract/offer.

3. Makes you the Creditor.  The Creditor is always the winner in court proceedings, all of which have only two (2) classes of participants: Creditors and Debtors.  The Debtor always loses and pays.
After you accept for value and own the contract/offer, the matter is non-negotiable, i.e. private and personal between you and the offerror in his non-official capacity.
Every arrest and incarceration today is seizing the surety on a commercial dishonor.  The commercial accounts must balance for commerce to function.  It is not possible to retain only the debit side of a bank ledger.  The offsetting asset side must be there for the books to balance, the commercial account to clear.  Otherwise, world commerce would collapse into a pile of mush immediately.
When you dishonor a commercial presentment (citation, etc.,) the offerror accepts your dishonor, undertaking a Banker’s Acceptance (BA) and executing a Bill of Exchange.  This Bill of Exchange is for at least 10 times the face amount, and possibly 100 X.  The one who accepts, being the Creditor, is entitled to place whatever value he wishes on the transaction.  The counties run on these bonds.
You must now pay the full amount or the Bill of Exchange, the bond, or the account remains open indefinitely; the case (books) never closes.  If you fail to pay in Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) to balance the books, then you are arrested and incarcerated as the surety, collateral, to raise the funds to balance the ledger.  These funds are raised by borrowing (via your straw man) on the public debt for which you, the real being, are responsible for paying (discharging) if you have not rebutted the rebuttable presumption that the King (Wizard, Bankers, Power Elite, etc.) owns your all capital-letter name.  You have no liability if the books are fully balanced.  Performance on acceptance balances the books.
This is one reason the prisons are so full.  Another reason is that the judges are part owners of the prisons, and make money on everyone they incarcerate.  Prisons are immense money-making operations due to the bonds raised against the straw men (debtors) of the people (collateral) warehoused behind bars.  High dollar amounts are attached to the bonds raised to incarcerate people.  The prison industry is big business, constituting the major industry in California, Texas, and Florida.
If you have a bail bond you can’t proceed until you rid yourself of the bond.  Accept it for value, send it back to the bondsman, register the bond in the Commercial Registry as your secured property.
Never confess who you are.  That is bearing false witness against yourself.  Some people advocate carrying no identification.  If you are arrested, they have two (2) hours to identify you.  If you identify yourself, they are allowed to hold you (provided you don’t sign their paperwork or otherwise traverse) for three (3) days (72 hours).  The general rule is therefore, of course, never tell them who you are (why do their job for them?) or sign anything.
Anything you do except comply, insofar as dealing with the police is concerned, is interfering with a policeman in his line of duty.  What is his duty?  It is revenue collection for the city.
One of three (3) things is needed to identify you:
1. your date of birth (the day your vessel, i.e. body, was birthed into the 14th Amendment Public Charitable “cestui que” Trust as a citizen of the United States, a corporate franchise launched into a voyage in commerce in an ocean of insolvency, i.e. unpayable bankruptcy).
2. your Driver License.
3. your Social Security Number.
Without any of the above three (3) items, their job is difficult to impossible, especially with a two (2) hour time limit.
A judge’s job is to get you to traverse, contest, and dishonor, and thereby make an offer, which the judge can accept, and thereby own.  If you are hauled into court or forced to go under threat, do not offer and do not negotiate.  If you reject, negotiate, or issue a counter-offer, you create a controversy.  You perform a dishonor, which the judge can accept.
Concerning every offer a judge makes to you, accept it for value, with words such as:
1. “Thank you for your offer, which I accept for value.  May I have your name please?”  (You are acknowledging his commercial presentment and wanting to know with whom you are doing business and entering into contract)
Thereafter you must proceed with the remainder of the standard questions and request, i.e.:
2. Do you have a claim against me?
3. Do you know anyone who has a claim against me?
4. I request the order of the court to be released to me immediately.
If the judge says, “I don’t have a claim against you, but I believe that the prosecutor does,” you proceed with the three (3) questions to the prosecutor.  If he says that the State of California, United States, etc., has a claim against you, say:
“I call the State of California to the witness stand.”
When the State of California fails to take the stand to testify and be cross-examined, you can say:
“It appears no one has a claim against me.  I request the Order of the Court to be released to me immediately.”
Remember that when you accept their offer for value, you place the amount on the transaction and they are required to perform and adjust your account.  You are now the Secured Party, i.e. Creditor.  You are the Principal and the Interest goes to you.
II. Proof of Claim.
The fundamental issues must be perpetually kept in mind and actualized.  Namely:
1. The central core of any dispute is who can state the claim upon which relief can be granted.  Whoever can prove his claim wins.
2. One rebuts their rebuttable presumption of holding a claim against you, via presumption of ownership (by your default) of your Birth Certificate and straw man, by filing a UCC-1 Financing Statement with the real you (upper and lower case spelling of your name) as Secured Party and your name in all capital letters as the DEBTOR.  The UCC-1 is the single most irrefutable, unbreakable, bedrock contract in the world today.
3. Without rebutting their rebuttable presumption via filing a UCC-1, their unrebutted presumption stands as the truth in commerce and you have no standing in law.  You are bereft of rights, devoid of standing in law, and completely unable to “state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”  The result is that you are rendered permanent DEBTOR owned by them and concerning which they have carte blanche to deal as they wish.  You are a slave on the master’s slave plantation without capacity to go against your owner.
4. Once filing the UCC-1 you have irrefutable proof of your supreme claim and, if you proceed correctly, win in any proceeding as the acknowledged Creditor in the matter.  Then all would-be claimants lose for “failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.”
5. The bottom line is therefore: How do you state your claim upon which relief can be granted in a manner that cannot be ignored by a judge or administrative agency?
6. The catch-22 of the matter is that in law only the original counts, but if you surrender your original of something you no longer have it.  Then if the opposition confiscates it you are devoid of a way to prove your claim and lose.
7. This conundrum is resolved in the following manner:
a. Obtain certified, true copies of your UCC filings in the Commercial Registry that establish your basic claim on your straw man and also any particular matter at hand (citation, indictment, court case, etc.);
b. Take the above-referenced documents (plus a certified, true copy of the court docket sheet—signed, dated, and stamped by the clerk—pertaining to your case, if one exists) to a notary and have two (2) or more notarial acknowledgments of the entire package as a “certified, true copy of the original”;
c. Serve one of the original notary acknowledgments, via process server or means such as Registered Mail with Affidavit of Service executed by a third party, notarized, on the judge, designated as “[Name of Judge—upper and lower case spelling] dba [NAME OF JUDGE], [FULL NAME OF COURT]” if such exists, or the legal department or party/office that receives service of process re an agency.
8. A notary acknowledgment has powerful effects and ramifications: it must be entered as evidence on the record of a court case and a judge must take judicial notice of it.  To achieve either of these results is not always easy.  By proceeding in this manner you have placed before the judge or authorized party on the other side a proof of your supreme claim that must be recognized and cannot be avoided.  In short, you have stated on the record (court or administrative) proof of your “claim upon which relief can be granted.”
A mere copy of the documents otherwise proving your supreme claim not only can be disregarded by a judge or legal department of an agency, it may be mandated to be disregarded (considered hearsay) since only the original counts.  To rely on mere copies may render your situation worse since you have played your hand, i.e. tipped them off, without the clout to back it up.
If you, or someone you know, is in jail, have the central documents pertaining to the case notarially acknowledged and served on the judge with at least a statement to the effect: “Enclosed/attached herewith is a notarially acknowledged, certified true copy of documents substantiating the supreme claim re [Citation, Tax Bill, Complaint, Case, etc.] of [Name of Secured Party].  Either provide proof of claim superior to the claim of Secured Party as evidenced by the enclosed/attached within [time frame you designate] or your failure to prove said superior claim within said time frame constitutes conclusive presumption, fact, i.e. judicial or administrative res judicata, that no such claim exists.  Absent your proof of superior claim Secured Party requests that the account be adjusted and the Order of the court be released to Secured Party immediately.”
Concerning anything you receive in writing from the system, it is a demand on or at least bears on your commercial liability.  A document you receive is almost always a bill, commercial presentment, offer to contract into your paying a debt or engaging in some specific performance.  In short, the system wants something from you.  Otherwise, why would they send you anything?  If it is a notice of discharge of an obligation (e.g. statement marked "paid in full”), it is still a matter concerning which you must establish your superior claim by accepting for value and registering in your UCC on the Commercial Registry.
As a result of the above, the procedure for dealing with essentially any document [e.g. Citation, Tax Bill, Complaint, Case, etc.] you receive is the same:
1. Make copies of the presentment;
2. Keep the original intact, pristine (unmarked on), in a safe place;
3. Stamp a copy with text to the effect: “accepted for value, all related endorsements, front and back, in accordance with House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933”;
4. Sign your name and date the stamped copy, using blue ink;
5. Send the stamped, signed, dated copy back to the sender within ten (10) days of your receipt thereof.
By engaging in the above process you have undertaken a Banker’s Acceptance, become the owner of the contract and entire matter, the holder in due course, Secured Party, and Creditor.  You have “placed the ball in their court” and their only options are to withdraw their offer (cancel the bill/offer) within the 72-hour Regulation Z grace period or thereafter be foreclosed from the option to do so.  They are then stuck with the debt in the amount you unilaterally choose (which must be at least equal to the amount of the bill, and preferably 100 times that amount to cover the bonding).  Their failure to cancel the matter within 3 days is a commercial dishonor and they are on the defensive.
Make the above-described procedure your norm for dealing with all unwanted claims against your commercial liability, whether tax agencies, bill collectors, court judgments, etc.  Remember the central Commercial Maxim: “An unrebutted affidavit, claim, or charge stands as the truth in commerce.”  You must accept for value, and do so within the time frame (10 days) allotted to you in order not to waive your opportunity to do so.