The Credit River Money Opinion


Read both the internal and attached. I believe Mahoney is the one who ended up dead shortly after his decision. Jim

Scotsman wrote: The Credit River Decision - Jerome Daly's Letters

From: John Prukop

To Whom it may concern: Posted below here are two letters giving a brief synopsis by Minnesota Attorney Jerome Daly, concerning his "Credit River Decision" from December 7, 1968. I have a complete transcript of this case, including the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, as well as Jerome Daly's scathing letter to the members of the Bar, to whom Jerome refers to as "The Boys in the Back Room." The letter is addressed to Patrick Foley, U.S. Attorney for Minnesota on December 27, 1968, and follows below here, in addition to Jerome's "Introduction" letter. Further below my e-mail signature line is a letter from Bill Drexler, who was an associate Justice in the Jerome Daly case in Minnesota, which you should find VERY interesting. I had a chance to meet and confer with Jerome Daly in 1991, when he assisted me with an unlawful foreclosure on my home in Puyallup. That case is not over yet.

At that time he was living out in California. He drafted some of the legal documents on my behalf. The brief he prepared in support of my position will knock your socks off. One of these days I'll post it with attachments, because it does take a "picture" to explain the fraud. If any of you still have Federal Reserve Notes, circa 1920's through the 1960's, you know what I'm talking about. And if you research and read Public Law 90-269 of March 18, 1968 followed by the Legislative History of Public Law 94-564, and the contents of Public Law 95-147 on October 28, 1977, you will begin to understand the FRAUD that has been perpetrated by the Congress of the United States upon the People of this Nation. Public Officials need to be held STRICTLY accountable to their Oath of Office and the Law of the Land. In my case, a certain Court Commissioner and a Superior Court Judge are yet to be prosecuted for their fraudulent perpetrations. Sometimes the wheels of "Justice" move slowly - but they will ONLY move when forced to do so by the Citizenry -- "We the People" -- who hold ALL the power over our ordained and established Constitution, Bill of Rights, and proper Organs of Government through Delegated Powers and Authority to Act on OUR behalf.

Perhaps after reading this you'll begin to understand why those who are enlightened to the fraud try to deal in Coin, as it is the ONLY medium of exchange specifically authorized under the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 & 6, and Article I, Section 10, as well as the Coinage Act of 1792, neither of which has ever been repealed, notwithstanding the fraudulent assertions otherwise by the totally compromised and corrupted Congress and Legislatures. As the Maxim of Law states, "Fraud and Justice never dwell together." And it should be remarked here that thanks to Congressman Philip M. Crane, you NOW have Gold and Silver Coin pursuant to Public Law 99-61 (July 9, 1985) and Public Law 99-185 (December 17, 1985). These two Public Laws made it possible for the minting and distribution of American Gold Eagles and Silver Eagles, available at your local Coin shop. Everyone should have some real "money" in their possession; but you need to know that your PAPER Federal Reserve Note with $1 printed on it won't buy a One Dollar Silver Eagle -- you'll have to give about $8.00 to $9.00 FRN's for the REAL "Dollar". Read Public Law 90-269 and you'll understand why. The paper FRN and the Silver dollar should be at "parity". By the way, "FRAUD" stands not only for the crime, but "Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Device".

Mr. Daly passed away a couple of years ago . . . but his Credit River Decision lives on, even though the members of the Bar have sought to suppress this case from public view. It is probably fitting to insert here Jerome's "Introduction" letter of February 7, 1969, as well as a copy of the letter to the US Attorney on December 27, 1968, so you have some idea of the gravity of what occurred, and before you read what Bill Drexler, a friend of Jerome, wrote below my signature line. I quote herein the two letters, as follows:

Jerome Daly
Attorney at Law
28 East Minnesota Street
Savage, Minnesota 55378

February 7, 1969

INTRODUCTION

On May 8, 1964 the writer executed a Note and Mortgage to the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, which is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Both Banks are private owned and are a part of the Federal Reserve Banking System.
In the Spring of 1967 the writer was in arrears $476.00 in the payments on this Note and Mortgage. The Note was secured by a Mortgage on real property in Spring Lake Township in Scott County, Minnesota. The Bank foreclosed by advertisement and bought the property at a Sheriff's Sale held on June 26, 1967 and did not redeem with the 12 month period of time allotted by law after the Sheriff's Sale.

The Bank brought the Action to recover the possession to the property in the Justice of the Peace Court at Savage, Minnesota. The first 2 Justices were disqualified by Affidavit of Prejudice. The first by the writer and the Second by the Bank. A third one refused to handle the case. It was then sent, pursuant to law, to Martin V. Mahoney, Justice of the Peace, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, who presided at a Jury trial on December 7, 1968. The Jury found the Note and Mortgage to be void for failure of a lawful consideration and refused to give any validity to the Sheriff's Sale. Verdict was for the writer with costs in the amount of $75.00.

The president of the Bank admitted that the Bank created the money and credit upon its own books by which it acquired or gave as consideration for the Note; that this was standard banking practice, that the credit first came into existence when they created it; that he knew of no United States Statutes which gave them the right to do this. This is the universal practice of these Banks. The Justice who heard the case handed down the opinion attached and included herein. Its reasoning is sound. It will withstand the test of time. This is the first time the question has been passed upon in the United States. I predict that this decision will go into the History Books as one of the great Documents of American History. It is a huge cornerstone wrenched from the temple of Imperialism and planted as one of the solid foundation stones of Liberty.

/s/ JEROME DALY
SAVAGE, MINNESOTA

____________________
[From] Jerome Daly
Attorney At Law
28 East Savage Street
Savage, Minnesota 55378
December 27, 1968

[To] Mr. Patrick Foley
United states Attorney for Minnesota
United States Court House Bldg.
Minneapolis, Minnesota

Re: First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly

Sir:

As you are on my mailing list, at your request, attached kindly find 2 copies of a decision rendered at Credit River Twp. Justice of the Peace court on December 9, 1968 by Justice Martin V. Mahoney, who by occupation is not dependent upon the fraudulent Federal Reserve Mob for his sustenance; thus he was able to view the whole fraud, which is Global in scope, with a mind in the settled calmness of impartiality, disinterestedness, and fairness, in keeping with his Oath and with a completely friendly feeling toward the Constitution of the United States of America.

In truth and in fact the Justice of the Peace Court is the highest Court in the land as it is the closest to the People. Every Judge who is dependent upon this fraudulent Federal Reserve, National and State Banking System for his sole support is DISQUALIFIED because of self interest and had no jurisdiction to sit in review of this Judgment. If any Appellate Court, including the Supreme Court of the United States, in review of this Judgment, perpetrates a fraud upon the People by defying the Constitutional Law of the United States, Mahoney has resolved that he will convene another Jury in Credit River Township to try the issue of the Fraud on the part of any State or Federal Judge, and in an action on my part to recover the possession if the Jury decides in my favor, the Constable and the Citizens Militia of Credit River Township will, pursuant to the Law, deliver me back into possession. So you see, this Justice of the Peace can keep the peace in Scott County, Minnesota, not with the help of these State and Federal Judges who have fled reality, but in spite of them. This Thomas Jefferson's prophesy with reference to Chattel Slavery once again rings true; "God's Justice will not sleep forever.". (emphasis added - now you may understand one of the lawful purposes of the Militia!)

One wonders sometimes what the United States, and its leaders, including the Shylock usury element, did to bring on a Peal Harbor Attack on December 7, 1941, with such suddenness and devastation. It could be the Judgment of a Just God giving vent to a stored wrath in retaliation to the money changers. It is ironic in deed that the Jury should return its verdict on the same day 27 years later and the National and International Banking and Oil Mob shudder in their back rooms where they have cornered the money of the World and where they sit pulling the strings; fostering, conniving and perpetrating War with profit to themselves paid for by the blood, sweat, tears and toil of the farmer, the mechanic, the laborer and the humbler members of society; and well they might tremble, for, as they listen they can hear, with every increasing distinctness, the sound of the waves at low tide as they wash across the lonely decks of the U.S.S. Arizona with over 2,500 men entombed in her hold, with oil still seeping therefrom to the surface.

It is better to be charitable than miserly, honest than dishonest, direct than indirect, upright than underhanded, intelligent than unintelligent, to have courage than be a coward, to be free than slave, in body and in mind.

I remain, Quite Independently Yours,

/s/ Jerome Daly

P.S. Give my best wishes for a New Year to the Boys in the Back Room.

J.D.
_____________________________________________________________________

PERMISSION TO REPOST GRANTED AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO CHANGES.

/s/ John R. Prukop

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance does whatever is dictated to it."

Thomas Paine, Rights of Man ("Conclusion")

“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void."  Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137 (1803)

CCW Coalition: Citizens For A Constitutional Washington
John R. Prukop, Executive Director
11910-C Meridian Ave. E., #142
Puyallup, Washington 98373
TEL: (253) 840-8071
FAX: (253) 840-8074
e-mail:  ccw@wolfenet.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This e-mail communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited, unless otherwise authorized herein. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

WARNING: Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed.

[Image]

Return to: ICE New File / Credit River Decision

Go to: ICE Main Page

I believe Mahoney is the one who ended up dead shortly after his decision. Jim Scotsman wrote: The Credit River Decision - Jerome Daly's Letters From: John Prukop o Whom it may concern: Posted below here are two letters giving a brief synopsis by Minnesota Attorney Jerome Daly, concerning his "Credit River Decision" from December 7, 1968. I have a complete transcript of this case, including the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, as well as Jerome Daly's scathing letter to the members of the Bar, to whom Jerome refers to as "The Boys in the Back Room." The letter is addressed to Patrick Foley, U.S. Attorney for Minnesota on December 27, 1968, and follows below here, in addition to Jerome's "Introduction" letter. Further below my e-mail signature line is a letter from Bill Drexler, who was an associate Justice in the Jerome Daly case in Minnesota, which you should find VERY interesting. I had a chance to meet and confer with Jerome Daly in 1991, when he assisted me with an unlawful foreclosure on my home in Puyallup. That case is not over yet. At that time he was living out in California. He drafted some of the legal documents on my behalf. The brief he prepared in support of my position will knock your socks off. One of these days I'll post it with attachments, because it does take a "picture" to explain the fraud. If any of you still have Federal Reserve Notes, circa 1920's through the 1960's, you know what I'm talking about. And if you research and read Public Law 90-269 of March 18, 1968 followed by the Legislative History of Public Law 94-564, and the contents of Public Law 95-147 on October 28, 1977, you will begin to understand the FRAUD that has been perpetrated by the Congress of the United States upon the People of this Nation. Public Officials need to be held STRICTLY accountable to their Oath of Office and the Law of the Land. In my case, a certain Court Commissioner and a Superior Court Judge are yet to be prosecuted for their fraudulent perpetrations. Sometimes the wheels of "Justice" move slowly - but they will ONLY move when forced to do so by the Citizenry -- "We the People" -- who hold ALL the power over our ordained and established Constitution, Bill of Rights, and proper Organs of Government through Delegated Powers and Authority to Act on OUR behalf. Perhaps after reading this you'll begin to understand why those who are enlightened to the fraud try to deal in Coin, as it is the ONLY medium of exchange specifically authorized under the Constitution, Article I, Section 8, Clause 5 & 6, and Article I, Section 10, as well as the Coinage Act of 1792, neither of which has ever been repealed, notwithstanding the fraudulent assertions otherwise by the totally compromised and corrupted Congress and Legislatures. As the Maxim of Law states, "Fraud and Justice never dwell together." And it should be remarked here that thanks to Congressman Philip M. Crane, you NOW have Gold and Silver Coin pursuant to Public Law 99-61 (July 9, 1985) and Public Law 99-185 (December 17, 1985). These two Public Laws made it possible for the minting and distribution of American Gold Eagles and Silver Eagles, available at your local Coin shop. Everyone should have some real "money" in their possession; but you need to know that your PAPER Federal Reserve Note with $1 printed on it won't buy a One Dollar Silver Eagle -- you'll have to give about $8.00 to $9.00 FRN's for the REAL "Dollar". Read Public Law 90-269 and you'll understand why. The paper FRN and the Silver dollar should be at "parity". By the way, "FRAUD" stands not only for the crime, but "Federal Reserve Accounting Unit Device". Mr. Daly passed away a couple of years ago . . . but his Credit River Decision lives on, even though the members of the Bar have sought to suppress this case from public view. It is probably fitting to insert here Jerome's "Introduction" letter of February 7, 1969, as well as a copy of the letter to the US Attorney on December 27, 1968, so you have some idea of the gravity of what occurred, and before you read what Bill Drexler, a friend of Jerome, wrote below my signature line. I quote herein the two letters, as follows:
                                                                                                            ___________________________
                                                                                                            Jerome Daly
                                                                                                            Attorney at Law
                                                                                                            28 East Minnesota Street
                                                                                                            Savage, Minnesota 55378
February 7, 1969 INTRODUCTION On May 8, 1964 the writer executed a Note and Mortgage to the First National Bank of Montgomery, Minnesota, which is a member of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis. Both Banks are private owned and are a part of the Federal Reserve Banking System.  In the Spring of 1967 the writer was in arrears $476.00 in the payments on this Note and Mortgage. The Note was secured by a Mortgage on real property in Spring Lake Township in Scott County, Minnesota. The Bank foreclosed by advertisement and bought the property at a Sheriff's Sale held on June 26, 1967 and did not redeem with the 12 month period of time allotted by law after the Sheriff's Sale. The Bank brought the Action to recover the possession to the property in the Justice of the Peace Court at Savage, Minnesota. The first 2 Justices were disqualified by Affidavit of Prejudice. The first by the writer and the Second by the Bank. A third one refused to handle the case. It was then sent, pursuant to law, to Martin V. Mahoney, Justice of the Peace, Credit River Township, Scott County, Minnesota, who presided at a Jury trial on December 7, 1968. The Jury found the Note and Mortgage to be void for failure of a lawful consideration and refused to give any validity to the Sheriff's Sale. Verdict was for the writer with costs in the amount of $75.00.  The president of the Bank admitted that the Bank created the money and credit upon its own books by which it acquired or gave as consideration for the Note; that this was standard banking practice, that the credit first came into existence when they created it; that he knew of no United States Statutes which gave them the right to do this. This is the universal practice of these Banks. The Justice who heard the case handed down the opinion attached and included herein. Its reasoning is sound. It will withstand the test of time. This is the first time the question has been passed upon in the United States. I predict that this decision will go into the History Books as one of the great Documents of American History. It is a huge cornerstone wrenched from the temple of Imperialism and planted as one of the solid foundation stones of Liberty.
                                                                                    /s/ JEROME DALY
                                                                                    SAVAGE, MINNESOTA
[From] Jerome Daly
Attorney At Law
28 East Savage Street
Savage, Minnesota 55378
December 27, 1968
[To] Mr. Patrick Foley United states Attorney for Minnesota United States Court House Bldg. Minneapolis, Minnesota Re: First National Bank of Montgomery vs. Jerome Daly Sir: As you are on my mailing list, at your request, attached kindly fin 2 copies of a decision rendered at Credit River Twp. Justice of the Peace court on December 9, 1968 by Justice Martin V. Mahoney, who by occupation is not dependent upon the fraudulent Federal Reserve Mob for his sustenance; thus he was able to view the whole fraud, which is Global in scope, with a mind in the settled calmness of impartiality, disinterestedness, and fairness, in keeping with his Oath and with a completely friendly feeling toward the Constitution of the United States of America.  In truth and in fact the Justice of the Peace Court is the highest Court in the land as it is the closest to the People. Every Judge who is dependent upon this fraudulent Federal Reserve, National and State Banking System for his sole support is DISQUALIFIED because of self interest and had no jurisdiction to sit in review of this Judgment. If any Appellate Court, including the Supreme Court of the United States, in review of this Judgment, perpetrates a fraud upon the People by defying the Constitutional Law of the United States, Mahoney has resolved that he will convene another Jury in Credit River Township to try the issue of the Fraud on the part of any State or Federal Judge, and in an action on my part to recover the possession if the Jury decides in my favor, the Constable and the Citizens Militia of Credit River Township will, pursuant to the Law, deliver me back into possession. So you see, this Justice of the Peace can keep the peace in Scott County, Minnesota, not with the help of these State and Federal Judges who have fled reality, but in spite of them. This Thomas Jefferson's prophesy with reference to Chattel Slavery once again rings true; "God's Justice will not sleep forever.". (emphasis added - now you may understand one of the lawful purposes of the Militia!) One wonders sometimes what the United States, and its leaders, including the Shylock usury element, did to bring on a Peal Harbor Attack on December 7, 1941, with such suddenness and devastation. It could be the Judgment of a Just God giving vent to a stored wrath in retaliation to the money changers. It is ironic in deed that the Jury should return its verdict on the same day 27 years later and the National and International Banking and Oil Mob shudder in their back rooms where they have cornered the money of the World and where they sit pulling the strings; fostering, conniving and perpetrating War with profit to themselves paid for by the blood, sweat, tears and toil of the farmer, the mechanic, the laborer and the humbler members of society; and well they might tremble, for, as they listen they can hear, with every increasing distinctness, the sound of the waves at low tide as they wash across the lonely decks of the U.S.S. Arizona with over 2,500 men entombed in her hold, with oil still seeping therefrom to the surface.  It is better to be charitable than miserly, honest than dishonest, direct than indirect, upright than underhanded, intelligent than unintelligent, to have courage than be a coward, to be free than slave, in body and in mind.

I remain, Quite Independently Yours, /s/ Jerome Daly  P.S. Give my best wishes for a New Year to the Boys in the Back Room. J.D. _____________________________________________________________________ PERMISSION TO REPOST GRANTED AS LONG AS THERE ARE NO CHANGES. /s/ John R. Prukop "Reason obeys itself; and ignorance does whatever is dictated to it." --Thomas Paine, Rights of Man ("Conclusion") "All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void." --Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137 (1803) CCW Coalition: Citizens For A Constitutional Washington John R. Prukop, Executive Director 11910-C Meridian Ave. E., #142 Puyallup, Washington 98373 TEL: (253) 840-8071 FAX: (253) 840-8074 e-mail: ccw@wolfenet.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail communication is intended for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited, unless otherwise authorized herein. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. WARNING: Because e-mail can be altered electronically, the integrity of this communication cannot be guaranteed. Return to: ICE New File / Credit <http://iresist.com/ice/new.html#Credit> River Decision Go to: ICE Main Page

Your mortgage documents are fake!


Prepare to be outraged. Newly obtained filings from this Florida woman's lawsuit uncover horrifying scheme (Update)
BY DAVID DAYEN


Your mortgage documents are fake!
Lynn Szymoniak (Credit: CBS News/60 MInutes)
If you know about foreclosure fraud, the mass fabrication of mortgage documents in state courts by banks attempting to foreclose on homeowners, you may have one nagging question: Why did banks have to resort to this illegal scheme? Was it just cheaper to mock up the documents than to provide the real ones? Did banks figure they simply had enough power over regulators, politicians and the courts to get away with it? (They were probably right about that one.)

A newly unsealed lawsuit, which banks settled in 2012 for $95 million, actually offers a different reason, providing a key answer to one of the persistent riddles of the financial crisis and its aftermath. The lawsuit states that banks resorted to fake documents because they could not legally establish true ownership of the loans when trying to foreclose.

This reality, which banks did not contest but instead settled out of court, means that tens of millions of mortgages in America still lack a legitimate chain of ownership, with implications far into the future. And if Congress, supported by the Obama Administration, goes back to the same housing finance system, with the same corrupt private entities who broke the nation’s private property system back in business packaging mortgages, then shame on all of us.

The 2011 lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in both North and South Carolina, by a white-collar fraud specialist named Lynn Szymoniak, on behalf of the federal government, seventeen states and three cities. Twenty-eight banks, mortgage servicers and document processing companies are named in the lawsuit, including mega-banks like JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Citi and Bank of America.

Szymoniak, who fell into foreclosure herself in 2009, researched her own mortgage documents and found massive fraud (for example, one document claimed that Deutsche Bank, listed as the owner of her mortgage, acquired ownership in October 2008, four months after they first filed for foreclosure). She eventually examined tens of thousands of documents, enough to piece together the entire scheme.

A mortgage has two parts: the promissory note (the IOU from the borrower to the lender) and the mortgage, which creates the lien on the home in case of default. During the housing bubble, banks bought loans from originators, and then (in a process known as securitization) enacted a series of transactions that would eventually pool thousands of mortgages into bonds, sold all over the world to public pension funds, state and municipal governments and other investors. A trustee would pool the loans and sell the securities to investors, and the investors would get an annual percentage yield on their money.

In order for the securitization to work, banks purchasing the mortgages had to physically convey the promissory note and the mortgage into the trust. The note had to be endorsed (the way an individual would endorse a check), and handed over to a document custodian for the trust, with a “mortgage assignment” confirming the transfer of ownership. And this had to be done before a 90-day cutoff date, with no grace period beyond that.

Georgetown Law Professor Adam Levitin spelled this out in testimony before Congress in 2010: “If mortgages were not properly transferred in the securitization process, then mortgage-backed securities would in fact not be backed by any mortgages whatsoever.”

The lawsuit alleges that these notes, as well as the mortgage assignments, were “never delivered to the mortgage-backed securities trusts,” and that the trustees lied to the SEC and investors about this. As a result, the trusts could not establish ownership of the loan when they went to foreclose, forcing the production of a stream of false documents, signed by “robo-signers,” employees using a bevy of corporate titles for companies that never employed them, to sign documents about which they had little or no knowledge.

Many documents were forged (the suit provides evidence of the signature of one robo-signer, Linda Green, written eight different ways), some were signed by “officers” of companies that went bankrupt years earlier, and dozens of assignments listed as the owner of the loan “Bogus Assignee for Intervening Assignments,” clearly a template that was never changed. One defendant in the case, Lender Processing Services, created masses of false documents on behalf of the banks, often using fake corporate officer titles and forged signatures. This was all done to establish standing to foreclose in courts, which the banks otherwise could not.

Szymoniak stated in her lawsuit that, “Defendants used fraudulent mortgage assignments to conceal that over 1400 MBS trusts, each with mortgages valued at over $1 billion, are missing critical documents,” meaning that at least $1.4 trillion in mortgage-backed securities are, in fact, non-mortgage-backed securities. Because of the strict laws governing of these kinds of securitizations, there’s no way to make the assignments after the fact. Activists have a name for this: “securitization FAIL.”

One smoking gun piece of evidence in the lawsuit concerns a mortgage assignment dated February 9, 2009, after the foreclosure of the mortgage in question was completed. According to the suit, “A typewritten note on the right hand side of the document states:  ‘This Assignment of Mortgage was inadvertently not recorded prior to the Final Judgment of Foreclosure… but is now being recorded to clear title.’”

This admission confirms that the mortgage assignment was not made before the closing date of the trust, invalidating ownership. The suit further argued that “the act of fabricating the assignments is evidence that the MBS Trust did not own the notes and/or the mortgage liens for some assets claimed to be in the pool.”

The federal government, states and cities joined the lawsuit under 25 counts of the federal False Claims Act and state-based versions of the law. All of them bought mortgage-backed securities from banks that never conveyed the mortgages or notes to the trusts. The plaintiffs argued that, considering that trustees and servicers had to spend lots of money forging and fabricating documents to establish ownership, they were materially harmed by the subsequent impaired value of the securities. Also, these investors (which includes the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve) paid for the transfer of mortgages to the trusts, yet they were never actually transferred.

Finally, the lawsuit argues that the federal government was harmed by “payments made on mortgage guarantees to Defendants lacking valid notes and assignments of mortgages who were not entitled to demand or receive said payments.”

Despite Szymoniak seeking a trial by jury, the government intervened in the case, and settled part of it at the beginning of 2012, extracting $95 million from the five biggest banks in the suit (Wells Fargo, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase, Citi and GMAC/Ally Bank). Szymoniak herself was awarded $18 million. But the underlying evidence was never revealed until the case was unsealed last Thursday.

Now that it’s unsealed, Szymoniak, as the named plaintiff, can go forward and prove the case. Along with her legal team (which includes the law firm of Grant & Eisenhoffer, which has recovered more money under the False Claims Act than any firm in the country), Szymoniak can pursue discovery and go to trial against the rest of the named defendants, including HSBC, the Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank and US Bank.

The expenses of the case, previously borne by the government, now are borne by Szymoniak and her team, but the percentages of recovery funds are also higher. “I’m really glad I was part of collecting this money for the government, and I’m looking forward to going through discovery and collecting the rest of it,” Szymoniak told Salon.

It’s good that the case remains active, because the $95 million settlement was a pittance compared to the enormity of the crime. By the end of 2009, private mortgage-backed securities trusts held one-third of all residential mortgages in the U.S. That means that tens of millions of home mortgages worth trillions of dollars have no legitimate underlying owner that can establish the right to foreclose. This hasn’t stopped banks from foreclosing anyway with false documents, and they are often successful, a testament to the breakdown of law in the judicial system. But to this day, the resulting chaos in disentangling ownership harms homeowners trying to sell these properties, as well as those trying to purchase them. And it renders some properties impossible to sell.

To this day, banks foreclose on borrowers using fraudulent mortgage assignments, a legacy of failing to prosecute this conduct and instead letting banks pay a fine to settle it. This disappoints Szymoniak, who told Salon the owner of these loans is now essentially “whoever lies the most convincingly and whoever gets the benefit of doubt from the judge.” Szymoniak used her share of the settlement to start the Housing Justice Foundation, a non-profit that attempts to raise awareness of the continuing corruption of the nation’s courts and land title system.

Most of official Washington, including President Obama, wants to wind down mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and return to a system where private lenders create securitization trusts, packaging pools of loans and selling them to investors. Government would provide a limited guarantee to investors against catastrophic losses, but the private banks would make the securities, to generate more capital for home loans and expand homeownership.

That’s despite the evidence we now have that, the last time banks tried this, they ignored the law, failed to convey the mortgages and notes to the trusts, and ripped off investors trying to cover their tracks, to say nothing of how they violated the due process rights of homeowners and stole their homes with fake documents.

The very same banks that created this criminal enterprise and legal quagmire would be in control again. Why should we view this in any way as a sound public policy, instead of a ticking time bomb that could once again throw the private property system, a bulwark of capitalism and indeed civilization itself, into utter disarray? As Lynn Szymoniak puts it, “The President’s calling for private equity to return. Why would we return to this?”

Update: This story previously suggested that banks settled this lawsuit with the federal government for $1 billion. That number is actually the total for a number of whistleblower lawsuits that were folded into a larger National Mortgage Settlement. This specific lawsuit settled for $95 million. The post above has been changed to reflect this fact.

David Dayen is a contributing writer for Salon. Follow him on Twitter at@ddayen.

Source: http://www.salon.com/2013/08/12/your_mortgage_documents_are_fake/

COMMENT:

The article above and the Complaint prove fraud and faked documents were used to establish standing to foreclose on homes across America.  This is very serious, and the penalties for doing so can be severe.

American law prohibits a party from presenting false statements and faked evidence to a Court - and walking out with a valid judgment.  Once you can prove a faked document was used to procure jurisdiction or a judgment - at that very instant - the judgment is PERMANENTLY void ab initio (from the beginning).  The judgment is mere waste paper.  It is as though the case never happened. Do not let anyone tell you anything different.

Moreover, a void judgment cannot be ratified or replaced , and a judge is prohibited from validating a void judgment.

For at least the last 20-years, the banking industry has been fabricating evidence including counterfeit promissory Notes to literally steal homes in America.  Mere possession of a counterfeit Note is a felony!  Under New York law, when an attorney discovers they are in possession of a counterfeit promissory Note, they have only 14 days to report it to the District Attorney.

Judges trespass on the law when they allow copies of faked documents to be used to establish standing to sue or obtain judgment in a court proceeding.   It is the duty of the Court to verify it has jurisdiction, and it must constantly monitor the case to ensure it maintains jurisdiction.

A Void judgment is: One which has no legal force or effect, invalidity of which may be asserted by any person whose rights are affected at any time and at any place directly or collaterally.  Reynolds v. Volunteer State Life Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1087, 1092.  One which from its inception is and forever continues to be absolutely null, without legal efficacy, ineffectual to bind parties or support a right, of no legal force and effect whatever, and incapable of confirmation, ratification, or enforcement in any manner or to any degree.  Judgment is a "void judgment" if court that rendered judgment lacked jurisdiction of the subject matter, or of the parties, or acted in a manner inconsistent with due process.  Klugh v. U.S., D.C.S.C., 610 F.Supp. 892, 901.

“[I]t is immaterial if the case is closed, as there is no statute of limitation applying to void judgments.  A “void judgment” as we all know, grounds no rights, forms no defense to actions taken there under, and is vulnerable to any manner of collateral attack.  No statute of limitations or repose runs on its holdings, the matters thought to be settled thereby are not res judicata, and years later, when the memories may have grown dim and rights long been regarded as vested, any disgruntled litigant may reopen the old wound and once more probe its depths. And it is then as though trial and adjudication had never been.” 10/13/58 Fritts v Krugh Sup. Ct. Mich, 92 N.W.2d 604, 354 Mich. 97.
A void judgment cannot constitute res judicata. Denial of previous motions to vacate a void judgment could not validate the judgment or constitute res judicata, for the reason that the lack of judicial power inheres in every stage of the proceedings in which the judgment was rendered. Bruce v. Miller, 360 P.2d 508, 1960 OK 266 (Okla. 12/27/1960).

Maybe homeowners can now march their void judgments and certified property records into the court and have Robo-Judges stamp them all: "VOID FOR FRAUD"
To repair the tainted titles, GIVE THE HOUSES BACK TO THE RIGHTFUL OWNERS and jail EVERYONE responsible, including the lawyers and judges who knew all along!  - MSFraud

YOUR STRAWMAN PERSON

“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”

   - Edward Mandell House; in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson [President 1913-1921] - source unknown.


Essentially, House's quote illuminates the multiple "needs" for imposing Legal Person's status upon us by the Elite. The 'Strawman', also known as the Legal Person or Natural Person is the idea that a Fictitious Legal Entity, called a PERSON, exists for purposes of Law and Commerce. Person and People are very different things. The definition of person never mentions a living sentient man or woman. The closest reference in law dictionaries that you will find to that of a man or woman is "human being."



Legalese is a secret language invented to trick you. It uses English words but attaches secret meanings to those words with the sole intention of stopping you believing that what they are saying to you has nothing to do with the normal meaning in the English language. Their purpose is to FOOL you!

The legal meaning of "person" is not a living, breathing man. It does not exist in reality, but only in fiction. By legal definition, a "person" is an abstract entity, a creation of the mind, such as a corporation, partnership, or trust. "Person" ("persona")="mask".  The state, as a corporate abstraction, cannot create real people, but can create the mask they wear, and tax, regulate, and control that creation (mask/person).  A "Person" can be whatever government defines it to mean.  In this world words are arbitrarily defined and changed at will. Today black can be white, the law of the sea can be the law of the land, private can be "public", foreign can be "domestic"; tomorrow they could be re-defined.  An exception is that a "person" can never be a real, living man.

A "person" is a contractual office-holder in a changeable abstraction called "government."  Unfortunately, legal force is attached to legal definitions.  As a part of government, a "person" is subject to all the whims, machinations, and statutes of the government that defines the term.
The word "person" includes individuals, children, firms, associations, joint adventures, partnerships, estates, trusts, business trusts, syndicates, fiduciaries, corporations, and all other groups or combinations.

The word "person" in legal terminology is perceived as a general word which normally includes in its scope a variety of entities other than human beings.
See e.g. 1 U.S.C. sec 1. Church of Scientology v. U.S. Dept. of Justice (1979) 612F.2d 417, 425.

As found in Black's Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1142
PERSON: In general usage, a human being (i.e. natural person), though by statute term may include labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in bankruptcy, or receivers. See e.g. National labor Relations Act, § 2(1), 29 U.S.C.A. § 152; Uniform Partnership Act, § 2.

A person is defined here as various legal entities (ie. a corporation, association, city, partnership, etc.), a human being, an individual, or a natural person. The simplest term to understand is that of any legal entity, such as a corporation. Every legal entity is created by the state itself and under the exclusive authority of the state that created it. Quick look into Title 26 U.S.C. §7343 [Definition of the term "Person"]: The term "person" as used in this chapter [chapter 75] includes an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership, who as such officer, employee, or member is under a duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs. Did you get that? The term "person" is defined as "an officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee of a partnership". Did you see the words  man" or  woman"?

Now let's look at the definition of "individual".

INDIVIDUAL: adj.  1. Existing as an indivisible entity. 2. Of or relating to a single person or thing, as opposed to a group. Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, The West Group ©1999.

At first, this seems like double-talk, but it's not. An individual is a single legal entity as opposed to a corporate entity (made of members who comprise a singular group). None-the-less, a legal entity is simply a legal entity. In reality, the definitions are telling us that an individual is a legal entity, a fiction of "law", with the same legal structure and authority as a corporation, but with only one singular "member". If a flesh and blood man appears before a court answering that he is an individual, he has agreed and stated that he is a legal entity. Also, a look into Title 5 U.S.C. §552a(a)(2) or (a)(13) which shows an ‘individual’ [as legally defined] to be a ‘public officer’ or ‘federal personnel’.

NATURAL PERSON: a human being as distinguished from a person (as a corporation) created by operation of law. --Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996. [underlining added]

From this definition, there is the distinction that a natural person is not a person created by state law (a legal entity). A natural person is defined here as a human being. Although a human being is not defined as a corporation, both are defined as being a person.

LEGAL PERSON: a body of persons or an entity (as a corporation) considered as having many of the rights and responsibilities of a natural person and esp. the capacity to sue and be sued. --Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996. [underlining added].

ARTIFICIAL PERSON: "legal person"--Merriam Webster's Dictionary of Law ©1996. [underlining added].

Entity. An organization (such as a business or a governmental unit) that has a legal identity apart from its members. --Black's Law Dictionary, Seventh Edition, The West Group ©1999.

Legal personality (also artificial personality, juridical personality, legal entity and juristic personality) is the characteristic of a non-living entity regarded by law to have the status of personhood.

A legal person (Latin: persona ficta) (also artificial person, juridical person, juristic person, legal entity and body corporate, also commonly called a vehicle) has a legal name and has certain rights, protections, privileges, responsibilities, and liabilities under law, similar to those of a natural person. The concept of a legal person is a fundamental legal fiction. It is pertinent to the philosophy of law, as it is essential to laws affecting a corporation (corporations law) (the law of business associations).





This PERSON is similar to a Company or Corporation in that it exists as a construct of the imagination - it has no real body, and no soul to save, but for legal purposes, carries similar rights and attributes to that of a Human Man or Woman.

Only reality can be sovereign.  A sovereign is not subject to any government (mental construct) or statutes pertaining to "persons".  (See Otherson v. U.s., 480 Fed Supp 1369; U.S v. Cooper, (1941) 318 U.S 600; U.S v Fox, 95 US 670, 24 L.Ed 538; U.S v. Mine Workers, (1947) 330 US 258; Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, (1979) 42 US 653, 61 L Ed 2nd 153).

A PERSON has two attributes, a NAME and a Birth Date, both of which are hearsay. Our primary Legal Person, or "ID Card" consists of Birth Date, Eye color, Hair color, Height, Weight, and now Fingerprints and Retina-scans, as if that's all we are. Nowhere on an ID Card are your Soul, or your Personality, or your Hopes, Dreams or Capacity to Love ever mentioned. The legal term "natural person" is still a PERSON, so do not be fooled! When it comes to statutes, codes and regulations, you'll never see any mention of a man or a woman.



When a child is born in the United States (and now all over the world) a birth certificate is registered with the Bureau of Vital Statistics in the State of Birth. The key word here is "registered" as in registered in international commerce. A child then become the surety, whose energy is due at some future date. When the birth certificate is registered in the U.S Department of Commerce, the Department of Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate ($1,000,000) and the bond is sold at some securities exchange and perhaps bought by the Federal Reserve Bank, which then uses it as collateral in order to issue Federal Reserve Notes or some other form of "debt obligation" (see 18 USC 511). (Obtaining a birth certificate is not required under common law.)

A bond is then held in trust for the Federal Reserve at the Depository Trust Corp. At 55 Water Street in New York, about two blocks down the street from the FED. It is a high rise office building and the sign out front reads "the tower of power". When the birth certificate is issued, a separate legal entity is created, The separate entity, or alter ego (ALL CAPTIAL LETTER NAME) is the "straw man" (See Black's Law 6th edition dictionary) and it is the "accomodation party" of the Uniform commercial code 3-415.

Those all-capital letters do not represent the flesh and blood "Jack Smith” who was born to 'Momma Smith'. Those all cap letters represent the CORPORATE SURROGATE of Jack Smith known as "the strawman" that is REPRESENTING the flesh and blood Jack Smith in the CORPORATE COURT SYSTEM that has replaced Common Law courts, which the government doesn't want you to know about or think had ever existed.

The "name" is credit (see Black's 6th "accommodation party".) Therefore the right (or the use) has been separated from the title or deed.) The "Strawman" holds the title ( he belongs to the government's client who bought the title) and the real live you, flesh and blood man or woman has only naked possessions with the limited "right" to use the things. Maybe that is why our civil rights suits get dismissed out of court on Civil Rule 12(b)(6) motions. This deals with the "failure to state a title upon which relief can be granted." A claim is another word for "title". We have "failed to state upon which relief can be granted". We do not own the "title" to our own bodies anymore. When the straw man (you) violate some rule or statue (for instance a traffic ticket), the flesh and blood, the real you has to appear at the arraignment and admit the straw man's name (credit), and the "energy" surety is due and payable (fine) by the flesh and blood mwn who is in use of the straw man. This is why it is so important to "voluntarily give" your name to the magistrate (court). The defendant is the straw man. The real you, the flesh and blood you is the "offender".   Go into a court room and fail to admit to your "NAME" and see how frustrated the Judge gets. The only way they can continue is to create the joinder between you and the NAME. You are not your NAME.  And they only have jurisdiction over the NAME.

When you are given a birth certificate an entirely separate legal entity was created. This is called the "strawman". Of course this was done without your knowledge or consent as you were just an infant at the time. Your parents also had no idea their biological property would be used as security to back the fiat paper currency of our nation. The strawman is a fictitious legal entity, created with the hope that when you grew up, you would be fooled into believing that the strawman is actually you. Thus you'd be liable for all of the imaginary costs and liabilities attached to the strawman by these con-artists.  It is shown in the ALL CAPITAL letter name displayed on the birth certificate, social security number, driver's license, tax forms, utility bills, and even credit card bills.

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse," is the excuse they use to purport this scheme upon the American people. However, this scheme exists in many other countries, proving just how far spread this deception goes. It comes down to wordplay, also known as legalese. Common words we use every day actually have an entirely different meaning when it comes to law. Yet, because we aren't privy to the knowledge of the "law society", we are so easily duped, via fraud and coercion, into being a part of the scheme. A part of the machine.

When anything is registered with the state, ownership is waived and all you are left with is a title, or a certificate. (i.e, the certificate of live birth, the title to your vehicle.)  The registering of a baby's birth actually passes "ownership" of the baby to the government and that allows the State to take the child away from the parents if they ever want to do that.   This applies until the child reaches the 'age of maturity' set by the current legal statutes.   Doing that is not "lawful" but after the birth has been registered, it is "legal" and there is a world of difference between those two terms, a difference which it is very important that you come to understand clearly. Another way the State can gain ownership of a child is via the Marriage License.  With this, the government becomes the principal in a contract involving the three of you, and gain an asset, which is then in the control of the government, the product of that marriage; the biological property; the children.

In Admiralty Law, Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.

To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage, where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward which they brought into this world by delivery, the act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards.

Then they asked your mother for your legal name in Upper Lower case which consists of one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally funded hospital, an act by which the res, the subject matter of a trust or substance thereof, was placed within the actual or constructive possession or control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the commercial registry as cargo under transportation.

The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title in a distinctive style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and registered with the State, via Certificate of registry, in commercial maritime law which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving him/her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel occurred identified by the filing with, for example the "Florida State Department of Health", Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.

Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s asset, a certificate of indebtedness and funded the bond through the IMF based on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same.

If you have an older-style Birth Certificate, look on the Reverse side of it, to see 3 points of interest.
1) A 6-10 digit Number that you have never used in your life.
2) The words "Revenue Receipt" on the left side of this number.
3) The words "For Treasury Purposes Only" on the right side of the number.

So now the IMF has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested with the "State of Florida", and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve account.

That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington, D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the "defendant", the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for the IMF.

Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the Registrar/Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she is taken care of properly.

This first Legal Person attached to you, is known as a "NATIONAL CITIZEN" which later becomes synonymous with being a "Government Employee", when you SUBMIT (give in) an APPLICATION (to beg) for REGISTRATION (to sign over your rights) to become a SINner, (by signing up for the Fraud called Social Insurance or Social Security).

You then receive your Employee ID # (also known as a SIN #) which creates another Person called a "TAXPAYER". This means you consent to the Income Tax Act, and now makes you liable for the Income Tax, in exchange for the "Benefits" of being a Government Employee.

When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you, because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on behalf of the beneficial owner "the trust”, which is resident within a territory occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes "of trade” effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade with the enemy for the beneficial owner the "trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying, presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or chose in action on behalf of the trust.

"A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and that of state of country only." [19 Corpus Juris Secundumn (C.J.S), Corporations 886]





So how does someone become a "person" and subject to regulation by state statutes and laws ?

There is only one way. You must ask the state for permission to volunteer to become a state person. You must volunteer because the U.S. Constitution forbids the state from compelling you into slavery. This is found in the 13th and 14th Amendments.

13th Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime, whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.14th Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law, nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The 14th Amendment created "citizenship" for artificial entities called "persons", i.e corporate government fictions and franchisees.  With subtle treachery, the 14th Amendment states:  "All persons born or naturalized in the United States..."  A real human being cannot be "born or naturalized" in a fiction.  Only artificial entities - "persons" - can be "born or naturalized" in an abstraction such as the "United States".  People proclaiming themselves "persons" are compelled to perform to whatever rules are attached to the term.  One who says: "I am a citizen of the United States" is legally stating:  "I am not a real, living, sentient being, but an imaginary creation of the minds of other men who are fully entitled to tax, regulate, control, and destroy me through my identification with a fiction that is their creation and property."  Citizenship of the UNITED STATES, which is a corporation (thus making you an employee) is an entirely different subject.

"Many of the modern civilians have narrowed the Import of the term 'person' as meaning  physical or natural person.  They define a person thus: 'homoe, cure statu sue censlderatus;, a human being, invested with the condition of status., And, In this definition, they use the term status in a restricted sense, as including only those conditions which comprise rights and as excluded conditions which are purely onerous and burthensome, or which consist of duties merely.  According to this definition, human beings who have no rights are not persons, but things, being classified with other things which have no rights residing in themselves, but are merely the subjects of rights residing in others.  Such, in the Roman law, down to the age of the Antonles, was the position of a slave." Professor John Austin, Austins Jur., Vol 1, 358.

You become a state created statutory "person" by taking up residency with the state and stepping into the office of "person." You must hold an "office" within the state government in order for that state government to regulate and control you. First comes the legislatively created office, then comes their control. If you do not have an office in state government, the legislature's control over you would also be prohibited by the Declaration of Rights section, usually found to be either Section I or II, of the State Constitution.

The most common office held in a state is therefore the office known as "person." ("taxpayer" "resident" "U.S Citizen" etc) Your state legislature created this office as a way to control people. It is an office most people occupy without even knowing that they are doing so. The legislature cannot lawfully control you because you are a flesh and blood human being.
God alone created you and by Right of creation, He alone can control you. It is the nature of law, that what one creates, one controls. This natural law is the force that binds a creature to its creator. God created us and we are, therefore, subject to His laws, whether or not we acknowledge Him as our Creator.

The way the state gets around God's law and thereby controls the people is by creating only an office, and not a real human. (The Strawman). This office is titled as "person" and then the legislature claims that you are filling that office. Legislators erroneously now think that they can make laws that also control men. They create entire bodies of laws - motor vehicle code, building code, compulsory education laws, and so on. They still cannot control men or women, but they can now control the office they created. And look who is sitting in that office -- YOU.

Then they create government departments to administer regulations to these offices. ("driver', "taxpayer" etc).  With in these administrative departments of state government are hundreds of other state created offices.  They have created the office of "person." The state creates many other offices such as police officer, prosecutor, judge etc. and everyone understands this concept. However, what most people fail to recognize and understand is the most common state office of all, the office of "person." Anyone filling one of these state offices is subject to regulation by their creator, the state legislature. Through the state created office of "person," the state gains its authority (jurisdiction) to regulate, control and judge you, the real human. What they have done is apply the natural law principle, "what one creates, one controls. "A look in Webster's dictionary reveals the origin of the word "person." It literally means "the mask an actor wears."

The legislature creates the office of "person" which is a mask. They cannot create real people, but they can create the "office" of "person," which is merely a mask, and then they persuade a flesh and blood human being to put on that mask by offering a fictitious privilege, such as a drivers license. Now the legislature has gained complete control over both the mask and the actor behind the mask. A resident is another state office holder.
The reason all state residents hold an office is so the state can control everything. It wants to create every single office so that all areas of your life are under the complete control of the state. Each office has prescribed duties and responsibilities and all these offices are regulated and governed by the state. If you read the fine print when you apply for a state license or privilege you will see that you must sign a declaration that you are in fact a "resident" of that state.

"Person" is a subset of resident. Judge is a subset of resident. Legislator and police officer are subsets of resident. If you hold any office in the state, you are a resident and subject to all legislative decrees in the form of statutes.

They will always say that we are free men. But they will never tell you that the legislatively created offices that you are occupying are not free. They will say, "All men are free," because that is a true statement.

What they do not say is, that holding any state office binds free men into slavery for the state. They are ever ready to trick you into accepting the state office of "person," and once you are filling that office, you cease to be free men. You become regulated creatures, called persons, totally created by the legislature. You will hear "free men" mentioned all the time, but you will never hear about "free persons."

Why aren't Sovereigns subject to the state's charges? Because of the concept of office. The state is attempting to prosecute only a particular office known as "person." If you are not in that state created office of "person," the state statutes simply do not apply to you. This is common sense, for example, if you are not in the state of Texas, then Texas laws do not apply to you. For the state to control someone, they have to first create the office. Then they must coerce a warm-blooded creature to come fill that office. They want you to fill that office.
Here is the often expressed understanding from the United States Supreme Court, that "in common usage, the term "person" does not include the Sovereign, statutes employing the person are ordinarily construed to exclude the Sovereign." Wilson v. Omaha Tribe, 442 U.S. 653, 667 (1979) (quoting United States v. Cooper Corp., 312 U.S. 600, 604 (1941)). See also United States v. Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 275 (1947).

The Strawman/Legal Person is thus the Evidence of your Signature (an oath) and Consent to Obey a set of Acts or Statutes, usually located on paper contract, or in a card form with your signature. For example. You sign for a "Drivers License" to create a Legal Person called a "DRIVER", and have consented to follow the Traffic Safety/Motor Vehicle Acts of your state or province. You sign up for a "Bank Account" to create a Legal Person called an "ACCOUNT HOLDER", usually providing your SIN/SSN # as part of your "Identification" which consents to allowing access to your bank account by court order to pay your Income Taxes by force! You sign up for "Voter Registration" to create Legal Person called a "VOTER", which gets to vote for new Employee's and Presidents/Prime Ministers for the Corporation your PERSON resides in, and thus consent to the actions of your representative and their party, even if it means going to war against an innocent foreign country, or proroguing their own Parliament illegally! There are literally dozens, if not hundreds of different PERSONS you can be holding, but none of them are YOU.

PERSONS must RESIDE within another Legal Entity, they cannot "Live" anywhere - that is why you are asked if you are a Resident of CANADA or the UNITED STATES. Authorities are not asking you, the Living Man or Woman if you Live in the Country, they are asking if your Legal Person RESIDES (has the right to do business/work) within their Corporation. We have to know what words mean when people claiming authority try to use Legal words to control us. Legal dictionaries are different than regular dictionaries, because Legal words carry Weight in Law, and are often defined completely differently within various Acts, Statutes and Legal dictionaries. It is literally another language, which is why they call it Legalese.


Definition of STRAMINEUS HOMO

L. Lat. A man of straw, one of no substance, put forward as bail or surety.

It all starts with your Birth Certificate. That is when the theft took place by the Bankers. The government decided to enslave us, as collateral for the bankers, with the birth certificate. As soon as you are born, the birth certificate is altered. What they did with your name, was change the Upper case, lower case spelling of the name, which is the human being, into an ALL-CAPITAL letter name. The capitalized version, or STRAWMAN, became the slave. It became the collateral to pay for the interest to the bankers.

(Incidentally, before the 1900's, people USED to write the evidence of a birth in their Family Bible.)

The government made us believe that the Capitlized aritificial name is in fact us, when it is not us. It is a CORPORATE entity. They need this version to work with, and it is a total deception, to the highest degree. The theft of your name begins at birth, and is carried throughout your entire life. You are a tax slave from birth til death. Just look at the Birth Certificate, passport, citizen card (social security card), or the driver's license, you will see on there that it is not your property and belongs to the government. Any time you recieve a bill it will be addressed to the ALL CAPITAL letter name.
IT IS NOT YOU

We are Chattle/Corporations, Traded On The Stock Exchange

Ficticious Legal Entity Called A "Person"




Capitonym: A capitonym is a word that changes its meaning (and sometimes pronunciation) when it is capitalized, and usually applies to capitalization due to proper nouns or eponyms.

Proper Noun: A proper noun or proper name is a noun representing a unique entity. As distinguished from a common noun. In English and most other languages that use Latin-derived alphabets (Latin script), proper nouns are usually capitalized.
The name may also be referred to as a CODE NAME or Military name: A code name or cryptonym is a word or name used clandestinely to refer to another name or word. Code names are often used for military purposes, or in espionage. They may also be used in industry to protect secret projects.

You can thus conclude that the CAPITLIZED version of your name refers to the CORPORATE ENTITY.

All statutes, codes & regulations only apply to persons. Look at any "law" and you'll never see any of them apply to a man or woman.

If you carefully read the statute laws enacted by your state legislature you will find that they are all written with phrases similar to these examples:
- A person commits the offense of failure to carry a license
- A person commits the offense of failure to register a vehicle
-.A person commits the offense of driving uninsured
- A person commits the offense of fishing without a license

If you agree to represent your strawman, then these things become binding on you.   These are some of the "statutes" which 'politicians' keep inventing in order to make you poor, make them and their friends rich, and keep you in a position where you have to do everything they say, no matter how much that harms you and does away with your natural rights and freedom.

Notice that only "persons" can commit these state legislature-created crimes. According to government, a crime is an offense against the "state." (The State is a fiction. A construct of the mind.) The government can not actually make a real claim against you, the living sentient being, so they call forth the strawman. This is why when you go to court, the first thing they do is call your name. This is an attempt to get you to represent the strawman. All the courts are about these days is collecting revenue. Their first duty is essentially to gather as much money as they can from the people, to offset the national debt.

Natural Law and Common Law are the only laws which apply to men and women and they deal only with harming other people or causing them loss, and outside of those restrictions, a human has free and unlimited entitlement to do anything he chooses which complies with these principles.  As opposed to this, United States Code, The Motor Vehicle Act, Acts of Parliament, "Statutes” and Statutory Instruments "Contracts” do not apply to the human but only to the piece of paper which is the LEGAL PERSONALITY and which has no reality.   As the legal fiction of the LEGAL PERSONALITY was created by the company called "the United States"/"the United Kingdom Corporation” etc, it is that company which gets to say what the rights and duties are for that piece of paper.

The government wants to make you responsible for acts and statutes in admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, using your corporate fiction name. You are conforming to the laws, and the rules, and regulations, when in fact these laws and statues and man-made laws are from a ship on the sea, when we are living on land. (DEFACTO LAW).  If you say you are the strawman you allow them to create that jounder, between the uppercase/lowercase name, and the all capital name, what happens is that you become responsible and do become the debtor. If you don't conform to their rules and regulations, and you go over the speeding limit for example, then you did something wrong because you didn't comply to admiralty-martitime jurisdiction and the contracts you've made with the government.  The driver's license is a contract admitting that you operate in commerce and use the roads for profit.  The Motor Vehicle Act are the codes and regulations that dictate the rights of the "driver".  This entire subject is covered in The Right To Travel.

Those who become aware of their strawman may decide to separate themselves from that legal entity, copyright the name, file a UCC-1 financing statement, or simply stand in court as a living sentient being, making it difficult for the courts the gain jurisdiction. The common term used to define one who operates under common law, and is not dictated by statutes, is Free-Man-On-The-Land (FMOTL).  Other terms include "sovereign man" or "sovereign woman", "freeman" or "freewoman, and various other terms used at the their own discretion.

You have to study this info in depth and become an expert if you plan on going into court and declare your sovereignty. It's doable, but you need to be prepared because the judge will make mince meat out of you if you don't know what you are talking about. You have to know more than the judge about this and be confident in your knowledge. If you successfully move to the private side, you are no longer property of the state. You aren't obliged to knuckle under to state rules such as driver's licence or motor vehicle registration, or marriage licences, or income taxes, but you can't accept state welfare either. That means divorcing yourself from Social Security, Medicaid, etc. If you accept a benefit from government, you waive your rights.

A quick example of how courts use legalese to enslave the common man is using the word "understand".  "Do you understand the charges being brought against you?" Understand means DO YOU STAND UNDER MY AUTHORITY.  Another trick they try to play on you is to imply that a Summons is something which you MUST obey while in fact, it is only an Invitation to attend their place of business.   They are NOT inviting you, the man, but instead, they are inviting a LEGAL PERSONALITY to their place of business, and please note that there is a CHOICE as it is only an invitation.   The LEGAL PERSONALITY is just a piece of paper, a BIRTH CERTIFICATE created by the commercial company called "United States" and it is not the human.   You can’t be forced into a contract, so they have to deceive you into entering into one without understanding what you are doing. Of course any contract you have already made with this corporation can be proven null and void because those contracts lack the elements that make a contract binding.







Only by realizing and discerning WHO we really are: Powerful spiritual beings with unlimited creative potential created by God, can we break the first invisible chain keeping us from freedom. "You can declare your Rights and stand upon them as a Sovereign Man or Woman by filing "Notices of Understanding and Intent" and "Claims of Right". You must tailor your own Notices and Claims to your own situation.  Standing upon your Sovereignty in court and winning is FACTUAL, but you must not fall for their NAME GAME, where they try to get you to accept your LEGAL NAME, which puts you in their jurisdiction. Doing that, in the eyes of the court, turns you from a Living Human with Human Rights, into a Soulless Corporate Entity with No Rights whatsoever.

Going to court in connection with any civil action, is a very bad idea as the only function of a court is to judge between two parties who disagree and then penalise the loser.   The court doesn't care who wins or loses, and the objective of the court is to make a profit for it's owners as it is a commercial enterprise and it's purpose is to acquire money from anybody who is fool enough to attend.   If you look at the Summons (which is really an invitation) to go to court, you will see that it is not in your name, but in the name of the strawman which they are hoping to fool you into representing.

The best solution to win against the crooked and corrupt courts is to never go to court and play their fixed game at all. If someone tries to use a Court Order against you, make sure it is SIGNED by a JUDGE or it is INVALID. Send correspondences pointing out this fact. Most Court Order's aren't actually signed, and officials use unsigned Court Order's as a confidence trick to gain your consent!

There is no silver bullet. There is no lazy way to learn about your rights. You must Research and do your homework to REALLY learn what you are doing. Ignorantly walking into court is like playing carelessly with a loaded handgun, while knowledge is the loaded gun.



Report Concerning Liability Of U.S Citizens In Regard To Federal Income Taxes





IRS Form 56 is the vehicle by which you indicate to the IRS the status of any fiduciary relationships that you might be involved with.  You can also use this form to terminate fiduciary relationships.

Your "strawman” is what we call your "statutory interface” to the commercial world. If you completely abandon your strawman, you will not be able to function within the commercial world. You cannot therefore completely abandon your strawman because you might starve to death! However, if you gift the "liabilities” of your strawman without gifting the "benefits” or "privileges”, you can outsmart the system. A UCC-1 Financing Statement is a way to take ownership of your strawman's NAME.

The Internal Revenue Code is an indirect excise tax on the privilege of doing business as an artificial entity which is either a corporation or a partnership created under the laws of the federal but not state government.  In fact, the term "income” is defined by the Constitution only as the "corporate profit” of this corporation.  A partnership is a form of "corporation”.  Income tax on the privilege of doing business as a corporation as measured by the profits of the corporation .  See section 5.6.5 of The Great IRS Hoax for further details on this subject.

Corporations are "citizens” under the Internal Revenue Code.  Corporations are also beneficiaries of a trust.  The trust document is the corporate charter that created the corporation under an act of the legislature. The trustees are the officers of the corporation.

"A corporation is a citizen, resident, or inhabitant of the state or country by or under the laws of which it was created, and of that state or country only."
[19 Corpus Juris Secundum legal encyclopedia, Corporations, §886]

Under the Internal Revenue Code, a "U.S. person” is the only proper subject of the tax code and that person is a corporation.  That "U.S. person” is defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30).  26 CFR §301.6109-1(b)(1) identifies this "U.S. person” only as an "it” and not a "he” or "she”.  Such a person can be either a resident alien or a citizen residing in a territory of the United States.

26 CFR - CHAPTER I - PART 301
§  301.6109-1  Identifying numbers
(b) Requirement to furnish one's own number --
(1) U.S. persons. Every U.S. person who makes under this title a return, statement, or other document must furnish its own taxpayer identifying number as required by the forms and the accompanying instructions.

When you file a form 1040, you are basically indicating to the government under penalty of perjury that you are either a trustee or an officer of a foreign/alien corporation that resides in the federal zone. (D.C) The  Form 1040 says in the upper left corner that it is only submitted by "U.S. individuals”.  An "individual” is either an "alien” or a "nonresident alien” under 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3).  Since "nonresident aliens” file the Form 1040NR and since you didn’t attach an IRS Form 2555 to your 1040 that you did file indicating you were a "U.S. citizen” under 8 U.S.C. §1401 who is living overseas, then the only type of "U.S.individual” you can be is an "alien”, which is synonymous with a "resident” under 26 CFR §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii). This "alien” is living inside the federal zone and is subject to federal laws and police powers.  The W-4 form you mistakenly filled out and submitted to your employer indicated in the upper left corner that you were an "employee”. The term "employee” is then defined in 26 U.S.C. §3401(c ) as a "public officer" of the United States government, which just happens to be a corporation under 28 U.S.C. §3002(15)(A).

The federal government only has jurisdiction over "foreign commerce” under Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution. Taxation internal to states of the Union is a plenary power reserved exclusively to states of the Union under the U.S. Constitution Amendments 9 and 10. See sections 5.2.3 and 5.2.11 of the Great IRS Hoax.

The strawman is identified in Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, p. 880 as "idemsonans":
"Idemsonans-sounding the same or alike. Having the same sound. The term applied to names which are substantially the same, though slightly varied in the spelling, as Lawrence and Lawrance.”

Your "strawman” is therefore a "corporation”, and "corporations” are the only types of entities that the federal government is authorized to tax under the Constitution. Makes lots of sense, huh? The important thing to remember is that as long as you are connected to an artificial entity such as a corporation that is a privileged creation of Congress, and as long as you live/are domiciled in the federal zone or are a "citizen" under 8 U.S.C. §1401 who is born (the birth certificate) in the District of Columbia or the territories and who derives "foreign income” from outside the United States the country, then your earnings come under the jurisdiction of the federal government and you will be treated as a "taxpayer”, with or without a liability statute making you one.