The issuing of bond for profit on prisoners has finally been deciphered. 
It is no wonder that there is a rise in prosecution for non-violent crimes! 
As soon as your social security number hits the system, there is 
someone buying a bond in your name that accrues the longer your ass 
sits in jail. We couldn’t figure out why the incarceration rate was so high 
that the counties couldn’t afford to pay the bill. 

The courts are operating under Statute Law. A “Statute” is defined in 
bond or obligation of record, being an abbreviation for “statute 
merchant” or “statute staple.” 
Statute –merchant = is defined as a security for a debt acknowledged 
to be due, entered into before the chief magistrate of some trading 
town, pursuant to the statute 13 Edward I. De Mercatoribus, by which 
not only the body of the debtor might be imprisoned, and his goods 
seized in satisfaction of the debt, but also his lands might be delivered 
to the creditor till out of the rents and profits of them the debt be 
The Grand Jury Foreman is the Drawer or Maker of the Indictment by 
his signature, the Defendant/Debtor or Straw-man is the Drawee and 
the State is the Payee and the live Man or Woman is the Payor. What 
they are doing in the courtroom is all commercial, and is in conformity 
to 27 CFR 72.11, where it says all Crimes are commercial. What the 
judge and prosecutor are doing in the courtroom is making a 
commercial presentment under section 3-501 (1) “Unless excused 
(section 3-511) presentment is necessary to charge secondary parties as follows”: 
(a) Presentment for acceptance is necessary to charge the drawer and 
endorsers of a draft where the draft so provides, or is payable 
elsewhere than at the residence or place of business of the drawee, or 
its date of payment depends upon such presentment. The holder may 
at his option present for acceptance any other draft payable at a stated 
(b) presentment for payment is necessary to charge any endorser; 
(c) in the case of any drawer, the acceptor of a draft payable at a bank 
or the maker of a note payable at a bank, presentment for payment is 
necessary, but failure to make presentment discharges such drawer, 
acceptor or maker only as stated in section 3-502 (1)(B). 
If you don’t accept the charge or presentment you are in dishonor for 
no acceptance under 3-505 of the U.C.C. (c) and 3-501 (2) (a), (b). 
Acceptance is the drawer’s signed engagement to honor the draft as 
presented. It must be written on the draft, and may consist of his 
signature alone. It becomes operative when completed by delivery or 
notification 3-410 of the U.C.C. 
You are the Fiduciary Trustee of the Straw-man which is a cesti que 
UNITED STATES TRUST; in this capacity you have the responsibility to 
discharge all his debts, by operation of law. You are also the principal 
or asset holder on the private side of the accounting ledger; you are 
holding the Exemption necessary to discharge the debt. When they 
monetize debt they have to have a principal, capital and interest is what 
circulates as principal and is called revenue or re-venue. Principal is 
where venue lies. When you are in dishonor they cannot use your 
exemption to pass the debt or charge through your account to obtain a 
discharge, so they sell your dishonor, which has a commercial value of $1,000,000 dollars for each count. When Social Security # is assigned or 
a Blank Bond is issued and when you are imprisoned the Bond is filled 
out. This Bond is called a Bid Bond, Standard Form 24 (REV. 10-98) 
prescribed by GSA-FAR (48 CFR) § 53.228(a). This is also called a Prison 
Bond. These are also referred to as Contract Surety Bonds. The First, the 
Bid Bond, provides financial assurance that the bid has been submitted 
in good faith and that the contractor intends to enter into the contract 
at the price bid and provide the required performance and payment 
bonds. The Second, the Performance Bond, protects the obligee from 
financial loss should the contractor fail to perform the contract in 
accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract documents. 
The Third kind of Contract Bond is the Payment Bond which guarantees 
that the contractor will pay certain subcontractor, labor and material 
bills associated with the project. 
On April 9, 2002 (12:18 pm) Lehman Brothers Banking Cartel in New 
York City agreed to provide prison industry leader CCA (Corrections 
Corporation of America) with a new $ 695.0 million senior secured 
credit facility, to be combined with a $150 million notes offering. The 
war on terrorism has created a buzz in the private prison industry. Less 
than three weeks after September 11th, a New York Post story on the 
for-profit private prison industry stated, “America’s new wall of 
homeland security is creating a big demand for cells to hold suspects 
and illegal aliens who might be rounded up.” In order to prosper, prison 
operators need to maintain a steady flow of prisoners and prison 
The Corrections Corporation of America owns most of your prison 
systems and sells its stock and shares on the New York Stock Exchange, 
the major stock holder is the Paine Webber Group.There is also a Prison Realty Trust [PZN], which is a real estate investment trust [REIT] and is 
the world’s largest private sector owner and developer. 
Prisons are nothing but warehouses for the storage of goods and 
chattel under commercial law. The Warden is a Bailee or Warehouseman 
[before the term Admiral was used he was called Custos Maris “Warden 
of the Sea”] [In some ancient records He was called Capitanus 
Maritimarum or “Captain or Tenant in Chief of the Maritime”] who 
receives personal property from another as Bailment. The Bailer is one 
who provides bail as a surety for a criminal defendant’s release. 
When your dishonor is sold within the United States it has a six digit 
accounting # and is called a Cardinal Number, when it is sold at the 
International Level it goes Ordinance or Military and uses a nine digit 
accounting number. This is where AutoTRIS and CUSIP come in. 
AutoTRIS is the Automated Forensic Traces Investigation System and 
was designed in the Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science using a 
graphical toolkit that was developed at Automation Designs & 
Solutions, Inc. for other software products. 
Why is privatizing prisons so appealing to Federal, State, and Local 
governments? As the Nation put it: The selling point was simple: Private 
companies could build and run prisons cheaper that the governments. 
Unfettered American Capitalism would produce a better fetter, saving 
cash-strapped states millions of dollars each year” while simultaneously 
generating huge profits. The Nation explains this miracle would be 
accomplished. “Private prisons receive a guaranteed [per diem] fee for 
each prisoner, regardless of the actual costs. Each dime they don’t 
spend on food or medical care [for prisoners] or on wages and training 
for the guards is a dime they can pocket.” Most guards in public prisons 
belong to the LEOU, which is part of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees AFSCME. I have a pointed question 
for you, why aren’t we as principals on the Private side of the 
accounting cycle using our Exemption Priority to discharge all this 
Public Debt under the Uniform Exemption Act section 3 “Exempt” 
means protected, and “exemption” means protection, from subjection to 
a judicial lien, process, or proceeding to collect a debt. The answer is 
we are all double-minded and do not know who we are in a 
commercial setting. Every individual in Prison is in there, because of 
Commercial Dishonor. 


Short Explanation as is Understood at this Time
(Subject to further clarification)

Around the time of the war between the United States and the southern states of the American union, the United States was busy putting together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the United States. This plan was necessary because the United States had no subjects and only the land ceded to it from the states, ie. the District which was only ten miles square and such land as was necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.

Between the 1860’s and the early 1900’s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction.
The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects and property for the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United States citizens, that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy sited in the District of Columbia. The American people in the republic sited in the several states, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the right to vote in the democracy in 1870 by
the 15th Amendment. All it required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits,came duties and responsibilities that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not , is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.

In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act,opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and its States, but it only applies to their subjects.

In the 1920’s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.

In the 1930’s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.

The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration of property through United States agencies, including the State of _______ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Mendall House. All of this was done without disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration – fraud. The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.

If a remedy were available, and the people chose not to or failed to use their remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics,government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations,added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public media was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect, news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long
enough for the solutions to be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people know there is something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the schools. How can the American people be free and subject to a sovereign governments whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10, 1933: “Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…” HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud
and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States.

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency is available to us to use to discharge public debts.

In the 1950’s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to the States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid 1960’s.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900’s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the
deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register their things with the United States and its sub-divisions, gained control of the substance through the registrations. The United States became the Holder of the titles to many things. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another, belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the things. That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [[Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created
when they try to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an impossibility.

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into trust (constructive) for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person by the United States.

If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt that is owed is to the owners of the registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors.

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor person. If the people are truly the principle,then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor’s liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for
the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns.

Debtors may have the use of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their remedy.