The Original 13th Amendment and the BAR Association

 

The Original 13th AmendmentThe original 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as understood by some, prohibits individuals with titles of nobility, such as esquires, from holding public office in the United States. It is claimed that this amendment was targeted during the War of 1812 to destroy its records, allowing esquires to hold office despite this prohibition.The BAR Association and Foreign AllegianceThe BAR Association originates from the Crown Temple in London, England. Attorneys who swear an oath to the BAR are considered agents of a foreign power, lacking U.S. citizenship. No state statutes, codes, rules, regulations, secretaries of state, or supreme courts authorize a “license to practice law.” The BAR card, dependent on paid dues to an exclusive organization, is not a license but an authorization to use copyrighted statutes, codes, rules, and regulations. These are not law but abrogations of law, defined as annulments through authoritative action, replacing common law with “color of law,” a term equated with fraudulent or piratical practices.Corporate Bankruptcy and GovernanceAll U.S. governing bodies—federal, state, county, and municipal—are bankrupt corporations linked through the Federal Project of Credit, as evidenced by their interconnected financial obligations. The U.S. Supreme Court, law firms, and other entities are bankrupt, operating without legitimate money or law. Attorneys’ actions, including letters, forms, court pleadings, and plea bargains, administer this bankruptcy, transferring the People’s property to a group referred to as the Chosen Masters.Prison Bonds and Commercial PaperCorrectional Corporation of America (CCA, Nashville, Tennessee) and other entities create commercial paper for inmates, assigning a monetary value to each, underwritten by firms like Lehman Brothers and traded on global financial markets. These bonds generate profits for BAR attorneys and their associates, derived from incarcerations for minor offenses like drug possession or expired licenses. Prison labor produces low-cost goods, reducing jobs and revenue in communities, and is seen as administering the U.S. bankruptcy for unjust enrichment.Admiralty Law and Common LawBAR attorneys have shifted jurisdiction from common law, where a crime requires harm to a person or property loss, to admiralty/maritime law by raising the “sea” on paper to cover the land. This subjects individuals to piracy-like actions, such as police stops, equated with kidnapping. The gold-fringed flag in courts is described as a pirate flag. Police officers, as corporate agents, enforce codes applicable only to corporations, not the People, and are revenue generators for the Chosen Masters.Harmful Practices and Corporate FraudBAR attorneys enable policies that harm the public through poisoned food (e.g., aspartame, GMOs, irradiation), air (e.g., chemtrails, pollution), water (e.g., fluoride), and land (e.g., eroded, demineralized soil). Dangerous vaccinations and drugs are forced on the sick, and corporations collect death benefits on secret life insurance policies taken out on employees. Courts, including traffic, bankruptcy, probate, and federal, are described as extortionist enterprises, with judges profiting from fines and cases, funded by corporate thuggery.Debt and Credit ReportingThe People are the source of all commercial credit, creating it through their energy, and cannot be debtors. Credit reporting agencies like Experian, TransUnion, and Equifax, as bankrupt corporations, slander the People’s names through collection letters. BAR attorneys fail to adjust accounts under Public Law 73-10, where all crimes are commercial, and Public Policy, which exempts the People from levy. Instead, they impose charges and incarcerate individuals, profiting regardless of case outcomes.Demands for ReformThe People demand:

1. Forgiveness of all debt.
2. Restoration of money backed by gold and silver.
3. Return of funds collected through illegal income taxes, Social Security, parking tickets, and court cases.
4. Immediate stand-down and permanent abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS).
5. Restoration of lawful government starting at the county level, with the sheriff as the highest elected official.
6. Release of non-violent prisoners, restoration of their property, reparations, and public apologies.
7. Incarceration of true criminals, including culpable BAR attorneys.

Invisible contracts are null and void for lack of consideration, full disclosure, and due to coercion, duress, and unconscionability. In common law, the only laws are to avoid harming others and honor contracts, distilled to treating others as one would be treated.BAR Attorneys’ Role and AccountabilityBAR attorneys, as holders of accounts in cases, must adjust ledgers to offset liabilities under Public Law 73-10 but fail to do so, profiting from a corrupt judicial system. A 1980 law allows attorneys to represent both sides in a case, but accepting payment from an unrepresented party is a felony. Individuals can terminate an attorney’s representation without recourse or prejudice.

Dealing With The Courts

The first few thing you must realize about courts are:

• Courts are Banks!
  
• Living beings can’t be in the statutory courts!
• If you are in a court, you are considered dead and worse (NON-exsitant!)
• From their angle you are literally NOT standing there!
• You can’t appear, you can only be somewhere or not!
• Only the LEGAL PERSON is summoned to any court, so you can’t go, sorry!
• All law today is commercial and for CORPORATIONS ONLY! There is no law for living beings in the CORPORATE MATRIX!
• Living beings are hostile enemies of the STATE/FEDERAL CORPORATION.
• Courts are Admiralty Military Zones. Admiralty Military War zones means (Courts of Martial-Military Law).
• If you go into a court you are trespassing in Admiralty where only commercial vessels (CORPORATIONS) are allowed and you are automatically in Admiralty Contempt.
• When you go into court you stepped out of your private jurisdiction and contracted (submitted) to hostile military jurisdiction by default.
• A lawyer can be in a court (supposedly) but you can’t, not even standing beside the lawyer! As you will see below the lawyer can’t be there either! Strange stuff!
• There are no courts to go to! A true court is an Article III court and there is no such blessing to be found not even in Washington.
• Courts are merchant-banks.
• All courts use a statutory jurisdiction which doesn’t even exist. They will say it is Statutory jurisdiction but we challenge anyone including the best judge or lawyer to locate that jurisdiction starting with the only document that establishes jurisdictions for courts, the constitution. Oh we forgot, there is no constitution either or any rights that go along with it, at least in a court! How insane is that?
• Since there  is no law and no courts and only commerce then it’s all about money!
• Since there is no money of substance to be found as well, then what is there?
• There is nothing! It’s all an act, a game and a heinous scam! All of it!
• The gambler clerks are the accountants-bookies for the bank-court. They bet on the BONDS then move the fake money(BONDS-BAD CHECKS) back and forth between the military officers of the court up to the U.S. District court and on to the money exchangers(the market). This scam goes on from Wall Street to the world bank!
• The judges are actors who conflictingly work for the STATE (the plaintiff) and the Attorneys are foreign British-BAR agents that aren’t even allowed in a real court.
• All prison/jail/warehouse bailiffs, sheriffs and police are Interpol military officers (hired to protect commerce-not people) so there aren’t any real American peace keepers either.
• So what the hell is going on?
• How do you deal with the courts and their scam if there is nothing to deal with?
• Well as a wise sentient being with all rights in tact you deal with the matter correctly up front!
• First you deal with their offer and secondly you expose their crimes!
• When you receive the first presentment (the indictment/charging instrument) which is a negotiable instrument DEAL WITH IT and deal with all the things listed above as well and you will never be in a court!
• Statutory Courts do NOT have subject matter jurisdiction over living beings and if you handle things correctly up front and do not contract to their jurisdiction by mistake, nothing serious will ever happen! Always challenge the Subject Matte jurisdiction of the court but do our research and stand in your private jurisdiction correctly!
• The first thing you could do is bring up the question of Subject Matter Jurisdiction over you the natural living man! They don’t have it and nothing can proceed until they prove it on the record! It is important to say that you must always abide under your private jurisdiction and you must stay in honor or they will end up having Subject matter Jurisdiction by shear Trickery! Be wise and always stay in peace!

How to Attach and Perfect a Security Interest Under the UCC

A secured transaction is a loan or purchase that is secured by collateral. It involves a borrower or buyer, technically known as the debtor, and a lender or seller, technically known as a creditor, and more specifically known as a secured party. Common secured transactions include a bank loaning a business money so the business can buy inventory, or a company selling a business equipment on credit. In these transactions, the business is the debtor, the bank or the selling company is the creditor, and, most likely, the inventory or equipment will be at least part of the collateral.
Under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which covers secured transactions, in order for a creditor to become a secured party—that is, a party with a legal right to take possession of collateral in the event of the debtor’s failure to pay—the creditor must take special steps. These steps are known asattachment of a security interest. Moreover, in order for a secured party to more fully ensure its legal rights in the event that other parties are asserting an interest in the same piece of collateral, the secured party must take additional steps. These additional steps are known as perfecting a security interest. Here we’ll look at both attachment and perfection of security interests.
Attachment
A creditor has a security interest in collateral, and becomes a secured party, if and when a security interest “attaches.” Under the UCC, a security interest generally does not attach unless three basic requirements are met. In simplest form, the requirements are that:
value be given for the security interest
the debtor has rights in the collateral (or power to transfer the collateral to a secured party); and
the debtor “authenticates” a security agreement.
Let’s briefly look at each of these requirements.
Value. A secured transaction is a contract between the debtor and the secured party. Like most contracts, there must be an exchange of consideration between the parties. In other words, there must be an exchange of value. In the case of secured transactions, the value given by the secured party is usually obvious. For example, a bank gives value to a debtor when, in conjunction with a security agreement, it loans money to the debtor to buy inventory. Similarly, a seller gives value to a debtor when, in conjunction with a security agreement, it sells equipment to the debtor.
Debtor’s rights in collateral. A business may have rights in collateral either by owning the collateral prior to the secured transaction or by purchasing the collateral as part of a secured transaction. When a business already owns certain property, it should be clear that the business has rights in that property, and can use it as collateral. In other cases, a business will buy items (materials, inventory, machinery and so on) on credit and want to use those same items as collateral. In such cases, the business will sign a conditional sales contract, which is also considered a security agreement, and which, under UCC sales rules, will give the business the necessary rights in the purchased items to use them as collateral. (Note: the alternative option of having the “power to transfer” the collateral often involves relatively unusual circumstances and is not covered here.)
Security agreement. For purposes of attachment, the debtor must “authenticate” a security agreement. In other words, the debtor must sign the agreement. (The UCC uses the term “authenticate” to include the possibility of electronic signatures.) A security agreement normally will contain a clear statement that the debtor is granting the secured party a security interest in specified goods. The agreement also must provide a description of the collateral. Section 9-108 of the UCC indicates generally that a description of collateral is sufficient “if it reasonably identifies what is described.” The same section then goes on to provide a half-dozen different possibilities for a reasonable identification, such a “specific listing,” a “category,” or a “quantity.” While the description of collateral in a security agreement may not need to be finely detailed, the UCC prohibits descriptions of collateral that are “supergeneric,” such as “all the debtor’s assets” or “all the debtor’s personal property.”
The UCC recognizes that some security agreements are quite complex, and, therefore, has various special rules regarding certain possible agreement terms. To take just one example, a security agreement may include a clause that the collateral is to include property that the debtor acquires after the agreement is signed. For the most part, the UCC allows parties to use “after-acquired property” as collateral; however, the UCC does not allow after-acquired consumer goods to serve as collateral.
The three requirements of: giving value, debtor rights in the collateral, and an authenticated security agreement apply to the most common types of collateral, such as equipment, inventory and even payments due under a contract. However, for certain less common types of collateral, the requirements relating to an authenticated security agreement may vary.

Perfection

A secured party perfects a security interest in order to help assure that no other party, such as another creditor or a bankruptcy trustee, will be able to claim the same collateral in the event that the debtor becomes insolvent. By perfecting its security interest, a secured party seeks to gain priority over other parties regarding the collateral.
The precise details of how to perfect a security interest depend in part on the local jurisdiction where the collateral is located. However, generally speaking, the primary ways for a secured party to perfect a security interest are:by filing a financing statement with the appropriate public office
by possessing the collateral by “controlling” the collateral; or it's done automatically upon attachment of the security interest.
Of these four listed items, the first--filing a financing statement--is by far the most common and important to understand.

Financing statement. Security interests for most types of collateral are usually perfected by filing a document known simply as a financing statement. The purpose of the financing statement, which is filed with a public office such as the Secretary of State, is to put other people on notice of the secured party’s security interest in the collateral. The UCC specifies what must be contained in a financing statement:
the name of the debtor the name of the secured party; and an indication of the collateral.

Regarding the first of these items, it is important that the name of the debtor be sufficiently specific and accurate, because financing statements are filed under the debtor’s name. If the name on the statement is wrong, the statement will fail to provide adequate notice to others, and will not succeed in perfecting the security interest. Section 9-503 of the UCC provides various, more specific rules regarding the sufficiency of a debtor’s name on a financing statement. For example, if the debtor is a “registered organization,” which might mean a corporation or limited liability company organized under a particular state’s law, then the name on the financing statement must match the name of the debtor as registered with the state. The second required item on the statement, the name of the secured party, is generally a straightforward matter. Finally, as to the third item, the rules for indication of collateral on the financing statement are largely the same as for the description of collateral on a security agreement (see above). However, unlike with a security agreement, on a financing statement it is acceptable to use a “supergeneric” description of collateral.

A standard form, known as Form UCC-1, is widely used by secured parties to file a financing statement. You can easily find a sample UCC-1 online. While many financing statements must be filed with the Secretary of State, you should check your own state’s laws for more information. As a final point, be aware that a financing statement can be, and sometimes is, filed before a security interest has attached; creditors do this in anticipation of creating a security interest, in order to make sure that the interest is perfected immediately upon attachment.
Possession. A security interest in many types of collateral, including “negotiable documents, goods, instruments, money, or tangible chattel paper,” may be perfected by the secured party possessing the collateral. However, so-called “intangible” collateral, such as accounts receivable, cannot be perfected by possession. While “possession” is not directly defined by the UCC in this context, it does appear to include possession not only by the secured party but also by an agent of the secured party.
Control. The UCC states that, “A security interest in investment property, deposit accounts, letter-of-credit rights, or electronic chattel paper may be perfected by control of the collateral . . . .” The meaning of “control” can vary depending on which type of collateral is involved. For example, a secured party may have control of a deposit account if the bank, the debtor and the secured party have all agreed that the secured party may handle the funds in that account “without further consent by the debtor.” As another example, a secured party has control over investment property, such as securities (shares of stock or the like), if the property is delivered to the secured party, and, if necessary, “endorsed” (signed) to the secured party.

Automatically upon attachment. The most important type of security interest that is perfected immediately upon attachment is what is known as a purchase-money security interest (PMSI) in consumer goods. A PMSI generally involves either: (1) a debtor buying an item on credit from a seller where the seller will be the secured party; or (2) a debtor using a loan from a bank directly to buy an item from a seller, where the bank will be the secured party. When the debtor in one of these circumstances is buying consumer goods, the secured party (seller or bank) does not need to file a financing statement in order to perfect the security interest. Note, however, that, while it may not be necessary to file a financing statement, not all security interests in PMSIs in consumer goods are perfected upon attachment. For example, some statutes governing certificates of title, such as for cars, require that a security interest be indicated on the certificate in order for the interest to be perfected. Finally, be aware that the UCC states that perfection occurs automatically upon attachment for about a dozen other relatively unusual types of collateral. (For more information, check UCC Section 9-309.)
Having covered the main ways to perfect a security interest, it is important to note that there may be situations where a secured party with a perfected security interest would still have that interest subordinated to some other party. However, in most cases, perfecting a security interest provides very substantial protection of that interest.
Final Note
This article is based on the current version of the model Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). However, not all states have adopted all sections of the current model UCC. Moreover, the model UCC specifically leaves it to individual states to determine the precise wording of certain sections. Therefore, you should always check your own state’s commercial code for the most accurate information.

JEAN KEATING LEGACY CLASS- 1099 OID

Every phase our Lives are in COMMERCE.

Every phase our Lives are in COMMERCE. You need your STRAWMAN to operate in COMMERCE. Your STRAWMAN has a LICENSE to operate in COMMERCE (i.e. Drivers License, Marriage License, Handgun License, Occupational License, Building Permits, etc.). A License is good as long as you want it to be, by your permission. When there is a FINE for misuse of your License, you need to learn how to then switch the STRAWMAN to the Living Soul with the Right to Life, Liberty, Property, and the Pursuit of Happiness.

The STRAWMAN is a TRANSMITTING UTILITY that allows you to operate in COMMERCE with a LICENSE to conduct your COMMERCIAL Affairs.
Anyone operating in COMMERCE without a LICENSE is committing a COMMERCIAL CRIME. You and I need to learn how to become the REPRESENTATIVE or AGENT for the STRAWMAN and conduct all of his/her COMMERCIAL AFFAIRS without getting involved.

All crimes are Commercial and are then regulated by COMMERCIAL COURTS. COMMERCIAL CRIMES are Murder, Stealing, Dealing in illegal drugs, Prostitution, Practicing Law or making a Legal Determination without the Permission or Consent by Assent of any party to a Contract.
All COMMERCE is ruled by CONTRACTS. All COURTS (Tribunals) are ruled by, CONTRACTS. Absent a CONTRACT, the COURT (Tribunal) will proceed to write a CONTRACT under Cause/Case #___. Will the defendant rise, what is your name. This is the signature for the Contract. How do you plead - this is the giving, of SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION and becomes part of the Consideration for the Contract. All the arguments are the Offer for the Contract and the JUDGMENT is the Acceptance for the CONTRACT. The court takes a Complaint, turns it into a CHARGE against the STRAWNMAN, tries him/her on the CHARGE and then a JUDGMENT is rendered which is a Civil Action, a Claim, and this must then be Accepted by the LIVING SOUL.

You Accept the JUDGMENT in two ways, by silence and signing the JUDGMENT or by Appealing it to a higher court (a THIRD PARTY) who will then agree with the Judgment. Why would you argue Law or Codes, Rules,Regulations, Procedure, Statutes when the CONTRACT is the LAW in your Case.
The Redemption Process or Acceptance For Value can then authorize the Payment of the JUDGMENT. The Judgment should be signed by the Court Clerk for they are the Court. In most cases the Judge will sign the Judgment hoping that you will accept the contract by one of the above two ways, by silence or signature or Appeal to a THIRD PARTY.

Another way is the Rejection of Contracts allowed under Truth in Lending and when the Contract is about Mortgages it comes under Regulation Z and Truth in Lending.
ALWAYS REMEMBER, everything is in COMMERCE and is ruled by CONTRACTS.
Codes, Rules, Regulations, Procedure, Statutes apply only to the Corporation that they were written for. You do not Argue Codes, Rules, Regulations, Statutes in COMMERCE - you argue CONTRACTS. If there is no CONTRACT,there is no CASE. There is no CONTRACT with a Policeman, Government Official, Federal Agent, or Federal Agency, even with a License. A government or Corporation is a FICTION and cannot sign a CONTRACT or enforce one unless you enter into their Organization or Corporation as an employee and argue their Codes, Rules,Regulations, Procedure, whereby they then use these to enforce a Contract.

Not one single Properly filed UCC Form has been turned down or prosecuted under any criminal laws.

During the year 1933 the Congress handed over control of all the Post Offices to the Secretary of the Treasury. Why would they do this? That is why the revenue is delivered to the Government on April Fifteenth.   When an Application and Certificate of Live Birth is delivered to the Department of the Treasury in Washington, D.C. that Certificate becomes Bonded, there is an account produced which we know as the Social Security Number, this means there are funds borrowed against these accounts.
The credit approved on paper is then invested in stocks and bonds. The Bureau of Engraving states that even the Federal Reserve uses the Bond Number which is stamped on the Certificate of Live Birth as it is also stamped on the Federal reserve Notes themselves. The Bond Number has one letter from (A-N) which is followed by eight numbers. You will notice recently printed Social Security Cards are now also printed with the Bond Number on the back in red ink. It is a fact that every single living, breathing human being in the United States is Bonded and used in Commercial Activities by the Corporation of the United States which has received them.


There have been IMF's that track commercial activity in the billions attached to individuals earning around fifty thousand dollars a year. The Government is utilizing both their name and assets to be used to trade in the drug, crude oil and various other commodities. This just proves that all property, both real and private property of every living, breathing American, is entrusted by Congress to provide collateral for the National Debt.
The Government states that well over twenty -five million UCC Financing statements have already been filed with UCC offices throughout the United States. Related Commercial Documents have been forwarded to the Secretary of the Treasury. These facts have been gathered through information acquired through the CID of the IRS, FBI, Secret Service, Justice Department, the Department of the Treasury and the Secretary of State. They have all confessed that not one single Properly filed UCC Form has been turned down or prosecuted under any criminal laws.

WHY THE UCC FILING? --- THE ENSLAVEMENT OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY LAWYERS:

Short Explanation as is Understood at this Time
(Subject to further clarification)

Around the time of the war between the United States and the southern states of the American union, the United States was busy putting together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the United States. This plan was necessary because the United States had no subjects and only the land ceded to it from the states, ie. the District which was only ten miles square and such land as was necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.

Between the 1860’s and the early 1900’s, banking and taxing mechanisms were changing through legislation. Cunning people closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on the legislation being passed in the United States. Of course such legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary duty of the legislators. It was the responsibility of the people to understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws that were being passed by the legislature. This distinction between the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the schools and churches. The early admiralty courts did not interpret legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the courts were overstepping their jurisdiction.
The people were in control because they knew who they were and where they were standing in relation to the United States.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books that facilitated the increase of subjects and property for the United States. The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of citizens – United States citizens, that had not formerly been recognized. Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons born or naturalized in the United States. They had all been born or naturalized in one of the several states. United States citizenship was a result of state citizenship. After the Civil War, a new class was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy sited in the District of Columbia. The American people in the republic sited in the several states, could choose to benefit as one of these new United States citizens BY CHOICE. The new class of citizens was given the right to vote in the democracy in 1870 by
the 15th Amendment. All it required was an application. Benefits came with this new citizenship, but with the benefits,came duties and responsibilities that were totally regulated by the legislature for the District of Columbia. Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to enslave the American people. (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the benefits offered by the United States. Whether House actually spoke the words or not , is really irrelevant because the scenario detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been implemented. Central banking for the United States was legislated with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913. The ability to decrease the currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the 16th Amendment in 1913. Support for the presumption that the American people had volunteered to participate in the United States democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913. The path was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the American Bar Association in 1913.

In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act,opening the doors for the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the Constitution. Even in times of peace, every contrived and created social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time powers and implement volumes of “law” that would increase the coffers of the United States. There is always a declared emergency in the United States and its States, but it only applies to their subjects.

In the 1920’s the States accelerated the push for mothers to register their babies. Life was good and people were not paying attention to what was happening in government. The stock market crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to take their money out before they lost everything.

In the 1930’s federal legislation provided for registration of babies through applications for birth certificates, so government workers could get maternity leave with pay. The States pushed for registration of cars through applications for certificates of title, and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust. Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to be sureties for the debts of the United States. The great depression supplied the diversion to keep the people’s attention off what government was doing. The Social Security program was implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind the United States’ new registered property and adhesion contracts through the new United States subjects.

The plan was well on its path by 1933. Massive registration of property through United States agencies, including the State of _______ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations, as predicted by Mendall House. All of this was done without disclosure of the material facts that accompanied each application for registration – fraud. The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.

If a remedy were available, and the people chose not to or failed to use their remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a common law court. The United States only needed to provide the remedy. It was not required to explain it or even tell the people where the remedy could be found. The attorneys did not even have to be taught about the remedy. That gave them plausible deniability when the people struggled to understand the new laws. The legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law explained to them regarding the bills they were passing. That gave them plausible deniability. If the people failed to use their remedy, the United States came out the winner every time. If the people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it and release the registered property back to the people, but only if the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in the proper manner. It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could act like they did not understand the people’s claims. Requiring the public schools to teach civics,government, and history classes out of approved politically correct text books also assured the people would not find the remedy for a long time. Passing new State and Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and regulations,added another level of protection against the people finding their remedy. The public media was molded to report politically correct, though substantially incorrect, news day after day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy available to them. The people could be separated from their money and their time to pursue the remedy long
enough for the solutions to be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge law libraries across the country. So many people know there is something wrong with all the conflicts in the laws with the “facts” taught in the schools. How can the American people be free and subject to a sovereign governments whims at the same time? Who would ever have thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the remedy? BUT they did!

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and recorded it in the Congressional Record. It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal Register. An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way for the withdrawal of gold in the United States. Representative Louis T. McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058). HJR 192 passed on June 3, 1933. Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10, 1933: “Mr. Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks…” HJR 192 is the insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for fraud
and treason against the American people. It also protects the American people from damages caused by the actions of the United States.

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills. It removed the requirement that the United States subjects and employees had to pay their debts with gold. It actually prohibited the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would require payment in gold. It also cancelled the clause in every contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation to be paid in gold – retroactively. It provided that the United States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the normal course of business in the United States. For a time, United States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be passed on to a debtor’s creditors to discharge the debtor’s debts. That same currency is available to us to use to discharge public debts.

In the 1950’s the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to the States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as though they were real. Security instruments replaced substance as collateral for debts. Security instruments could be supported by presumptive contracts. Debt instruments with collateral, and accommodating parties, could be used instead of money. Money and the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of laws had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance. All this was accomplished by the mid 1960’s.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must follow. The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated over the years. In the 1900’s the age-old principles of commerce shifted from substance to form. Presumption became a big part of the law. Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in courts. If the claimants were required to produce their claims every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they would seldom be successful. The principles expressed in the code combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities. These principles work as well for the people as they do for the
deceivers. The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register their things with the United States and its sub-divisions, gained control of the substance through the registrations. The United States became the Holder of the titles to many things. The definition of “property” is the interest one has in a thing. The thing is the principal. The property is the interest in the thing. Profits (interest) made from the property of another, belong to the owner of the thing. Profits were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers. The profits belong to the owners of the things. That is always the people. The corporation only shows ownership of paper – titles to things. The substance cannot appear in the fiction. [[Watch the movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created
when they try to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the fiction is made to look very much like substance, but fiction can never become substance. It is an impossibility.

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into trust (constructive) for the benefit of the owners. If the profits were put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud. The profits for each owner could not be commingled. If the owner failed to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. If the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers. The owner is responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges brought against his public person by the United States.

If the United States has the “gold”, the United States pays the bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger). The definition of “fund” is money set aside to pay a debt. The fund is there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties – the American people. The national debt that is owed is to the owners of the registered things – the American people, as well as to other creditors.

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to discharge that public debt from the trust fund. The way for the United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be the accommodating party for a debtor person. If the people are truly the principle,then they know how to handle their financial and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught. If the owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor’s liabilities without getting consideration in exchange. Here lies the fiction again. The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act like he agreed. That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or signing for the debtor person. The presumption that he is the accommodating party is strong enough for
the courts to hold the owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns.

Debtors may have the use of certain things, but the things belong to the creditors. The creditor is the master. The debtor is the servant. The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the duties and responsibilities a debtor has. If the owner of the thing is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for him. In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their remedy.

click here:

https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=4XGFACJDZK2AJ

The ZIP CODE Scam

Use of the Zip is voluntary. See Domestic Regulations. Section 122.32 as amended. You should also know that the Postal service cannot discriminate against the non-use of the Zip Code. See "Postal Reorganization Act ", Section 403, (Public Law, 91-375). The federal government
utilizes the ZIP code to prove that you reside in a “federal district of the District of Columbia”.
This is why the IRS and other government agencies (state and federal) require a Zip code when they assert jurisdiction by sending you a letter. They claim that this speeds the mail, but this is a sly and subtle TRICK. It is also prima facie evidence that you are a subject of Congress and a
"citizen of the District of Columbia " who is "resident " in one of the several states.
The receipt of mail with a ZIP code is one of the requirements for the IRS to have jurisdiction to send you notices. The government cannot bill a Citizen of Texas, because he is not within the purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the District of Columbia. In fact, the Internal Revenue
Service has adopted the ZIP code areas as Internal Revenue Districts. See the Federal Register,Volume 51, Number 53, Wednesday March 19, 1986.
You must remember that the Postal Service is a private corporation, a quasi-government agency.
It is no longer a full government agency. It is like the Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States and the United States Marshall Service. They are all outside the restrictions of the Federal Constitution, as private corporations. They are all powerful
in their respective areas of responsibility, to enforce collection for the federal debt. So, if you are using a ZIP code, you are in effect saying openly and notoriously that you do not live in the State of Texas, etc, but instead are a resident in the Texas area of the District of Columbia (a federal district). There are some so-called Patriot groups that I consider Patriots for money. They advocate the use of Title 42 suits (which are for federal citizens only), send mail to you with a ZIP code, and ask you to do things that place you within the municipal jurisdiction of the District of Columbia.
Remember these individuals may be agents of the government or, even worse, are advocating a one world government by the use of the Social Security number and the ZIP code.
So you must be aware of the movement towards a one world government through annihilation or elimination of State Citizens by use of the so-called 14th Amendment and its related laws.
It is this writer's opinion, both as a result of study, e.g. of page 11 of the National Area ZIP code Directory, of 26 U.S.C. 7621, of Section 4 of the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, of (TDO) 150-01; of the opinion in United States v LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 308, 98, 5
Ct 2d 2357, 571. Ed. 2d 221 (1978); of 12 U.S.C. 222; of 31 U.S.C. 103, and as a result of My actual experience, that a ZIP code address is presumed to create a "Federal jurisdiction " or “market venue” or “revenue districts” that override State boundaries, taking one who uses such modes of address outside of a State venue and its constitutional protections and into an international, commercial venue involving admiralty concerns of the "United States ", which is a commercial corporation domiciled in Washington, D. C.

More specifically, looking at the map on page 11 of the National ZIP Code Directory, e.g. at a local post office, one will see that the first digit of a ZIP code defines an area that includes more than on State. The first sentence of the explanatory paragraph begins.
“A ZIP code is a numerical code that identifies areas within the United States and its territories for the purpose of…..” [cf. 26 CFR 1 1-1 (c)]

Note the singular possessive pronoun "Its", not "their", therefore carrying the implication that it relates to the "United States" as a corporation domiciled in the District of Columbia (in the singular sense), not in the sense of being the 50 States of the Union (in the plural sense). The map shows all the States of the Union, but it also shows D.C., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, making the explanatory statement literally correct.

Properly construed, ZIP Codes can only be applicable in Federal territories and enclaves that may be located within the 50 States of the Union, and to the "United States" and District of Columbia and its territories - cf. Piqua Bank v Knoup, 6 Ohio 342, 404(1856) and U.S. v Butler,297 U.S. 1, 63 (1936) to the effect that "in every state there are two Governments, the state and the United States". Therefore, ZIP Code address are for the corporate "United States" and its agents (for example, a customs and duty collector at New York harbor, when they move out into the States of the Union to perform functions delegated to the "United States" by the National/Federal Constitution, or the Texas Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles, or a U.S. Congressman).

But, by propaganda, misleading information and seditious syntax, government has gotten nearly everyone in the 50 States of the Union to use ZIP Codes of address, and that creates a PRESUMPTION or a PREJUDICIAL ADMISSION that one is in such a Federal venue, or that one is such a government agent.

In general, it is well settled in law that Income Tax Statutes apply only to corporations and to their officers, agents, and employees acting in their official capacities, e.g. from Colonial Pipeline Co. v Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 44 L.Ed.2d.1, 95 S.Ct. 1538(1975)". ...However, all "income tax statutes apply only to state created creatures known as corporations no matter whether state, local, or federal". Since corporations act only through their official capacities, but not as individuals. This is the real purpose for Identifying Numbers-26 CFR 301.6109-1(d) & (g) and 26 U.S.C. 6331(a) and 26 CFR 301.6331-1, Part 4.Use of a ZIP Code address is tantamount to the admission of being a "citizen of the United States" who does not necessarily have the protections of the first eight Amendments to the Constitution (in the Bill of Rights) when proceeded against by Federal or State authority Maxwell v Dow, 176 U.S. 581, 20 S Ct 448 (1900), but "All the provisions of the constitution look to an indestructible union of indestructible states", Texas v White, 7 Wall 700; U.S. v Cathcart, 25 F Case No. 14,756, In re: Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No 18,273 (65 CJ
Section 2)-not known to be overturned.

Jury Nullification

As Thomas Jefferson said, in a letter to Thomas Paine in 1789: "I consider trial by jury as the only anchor yet devised by man, by which a government can be held to the principles of its constitution."
America's second President, John Adams, said in 1771: "It is not only [the juror's] right, but his duty...to find the verdict according to his own best understanding, judgment, and conscience, though in direct opposition to the direction of the court."
And John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, said: "The jury has a right to judge both the law as well as the fact in controversy." Georgia v. Brailsford, 1794.
In American legal tradition, an unconstitutional law is viewed as invalid, and is no law at all. And until a law passes the test of community acceptance, and is enforced by juries, it cannot be viewed as a done deal. Meanwhile, legislators continue to receive community feedback on how their work is being received.
Judges have, for the last hundred years, tried to hide this power from the American people, and now actively attempt to suppress it. The Fully Informed Jury Association is working to inform all Americans about their right as citizen jurors to vote their consciences, and would like to see citizens chosen to serve as jurors told the truth about their actual rights and responsibilities, as a matter of law.

 Today the majority of Americans pay taxes because when they get a job their employer requests that

 they fill out either: Internal Revenue Service Form W-2, Form W-4, or Form 1099, which, as a direct

 result, with holds taxes from their paychecks for their labor. The majority doesn't have a clue as to why

 they are paying these taxes in the first place, other than being conditioned to pay their so-called 'Fair

 Share!'It has been affirmed that labor is a fundamental, unalienable, protected right and this

 fundamental right is not supposed to be taxed. No profit of gain is to be realized via your labor!It is presumed that everyone is expected to know the law. It has been long held that,ignorance of the Law is not an excuse or a defense. There is a well-established maxim that states, "He who fails to assert his rights - HAS NONE!" which unequivocally establishes that, just as a closed mouth never gets fed, "a matter must be expressed to be resolved."The Bible, Book of Luke, 11th Chapter 52nd verse states: "Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering ye hindered. "When it comes to dealing with lawyers, government, and the Internal Revenue Service(which is not an agency of the United States Government, but a private foreign-owned corporation) withholding and keeping knowledge from the people is nothing new. It is a common business tactic that has been going on from the beginning of its inception. It will, most likely continue as long as we rely upon lawyers and government to do that which we ourselves should be doing.The Bible unquestionably verifies this with the following: Book of Isaiah, 5th Chapter 13th verse tells us: "Therefore my peole are gone into captivity, because they have no knowledge;" and the Book of Hosea, 4 Chapter 6th verse: "My people are destroyed fora lack of knowledge. "In order to find the answer as to why your labor is being taxed when the Constitution saysit is not supposed to be, it is necessary to understand how government exists andoperates.To accomplish this requires a quick review back in history to the time of the WarBetween the States. The People of this Nation lost their true Republican form ofgovernment. On March 27, 1861 seven southern States walked out of Congress leavingthe entire legislative Branch of Government without quorum. The Congress of theConstitution was dissolved for inability to disband or re-convene. The Republican formof Government, which the People were guaranteed - ceased to exist. Out of necessity tooperate the Government, President Lincoln issued Executive Order No. 2. in April 1861,reconvening the Congress at gunpoint in Executive, emergency, martial-law-rulejurisdiction. Since that time there has been no "'de jure" (sanctioned by law) Congress.Everything functions under "color of law" (the appearance or semblance, withoutsubstance, of legal right.) Through Executive Orders under authority of the War Powers,(i.e. emergency, i.e. law of "Necessity knows no law" (the law of forbidding killing is voided when done in selfdefense)."In time of war, laws are silent. " Cicero.To establish the underlying debt of the Government to the Bankers, to create corporateentities that are legally subject to the jurisdiction in which they exist, and to create thejurisdiction itself correctly, the so-called (fraudulent and un-ratified) FourteenthAmendment was proclaimed and passed in 1 868. This was a cestui que trust (operation inlaw) incorporated in a military, private, International, commercial, de facto jurisdictioncreated by, and belonging to, the Money Power, existing within the emergency of theWar Powers, the only operational jurisdiction since the dissolution of Congress in 1 86 1 .Through the 1 4th Amendment, an artificial person-corporate entity-franchise entitled"citizen of the United States" was born into private, corporate limited liability. Section 4of the 1 4th Amendment states : "The validity of the Public Debt of the United States (tothe Bankers) ... shall not be questioned. "Within the above-referenced private jurisdiction of the International B ankers, the privateand foreign owned "Congress" formed a corporation, commercial agency, andGovernment for the "District of Columbia" on February 2 1 , 1 87 1 , Chapter 62, 1 6 Stat.4 1 9. This corporation was reorganized June 1 1 , 1 878, Chapter 1 80, 20 Stat. 1 02, and renamed"United States Government. " This corporation privately trade marked the names:"United States, " "U. S . , " "US , " "U.S .A. , " "USA" and "America. "When the United States declared itself a municipal corporation, it also created what isknown as a cestui que trust to function under by implementing the Federal Constitution of1 87 1 , and incorporating the previous United States Constitutions of 1 787 and 1 79 1 asamended, as by-laws. Naturally, as the grantor of the trust, this empowered the UnitedStates Government to change the terms of the trust at will. As evidenced under theFederal Constitution of 1 87 1 , the 1 4th Amendment, the People of the United States,without their consent, were declared "Citizens" and granted "Civil Rights. " These socalledcivil rights are nothing more than mere privileges. Privileges which governmentlicenses, regulates, and can re-interpret to suit its purposes at any time for any reason.The Federal Corporate Government also conveniently somehow forgot to disclose to thePeople that the term "Citizen," with which they have made every living and breathinginhabitant a "subj ect," was defined in law as a "Vessel" engaged in commerce.In 1 9 1 2, when the bank-owned bonds that were keeping the US Government afloatbecame due, the B ankers refused to re-finance the debt. As a result, the colorable,martial-law ruled Congress was compelled to pass the Federal Reserve Act of 1 9 1 3 . ThisAct surrendered Constitutional authority to create, control, and manage the entire moneysupply of the United States to a handful of private, mostly-foreign bankers. This placedexclusive creation and control of the money within the private, commercial, foreign, andmilitary jurisdiction of 1 86 1 , into corporate limited liability.America converted from United States Notes to Federal Reserve Notes, beginning withthe passage of The Federal Reserve Act of 1 9 1 3 . Federal Reserve B anks wereincorporated in 1 9 1 4, and, in 1 9 1 6, began to circulate their private, corporate FederalReserve Notes as "money" alongside the nations "de jure" currency, the United StatesNotes. Whereas United States Notes were actually warehouse receipts for deposits ofgold and silver in a warehouse (bank), thus representing wealth (substance, portable land;the money of sovereigns), the new flat money (Federal Reserve Notes) amounted to "billsfor that which was yet to be paid, " i.e. for what was owed ! For the new "benefit" of beingable to carry around U.S. Government debt instruments (Federal Reserve Notes) in ourwallets instead of Gold Certificates or Silver Certificates, we agreed to redeem the newly issued Federal Reserve Notes in gold and also to pay interest for their use in gold ONLY!Essentially, the Fed issued paper with pretty green ink on it and we agreed to give themgold in exchange for the "privilege" of using it. Such was the bargain.Through paying interest to the Federal Reserve Corporation in gold, the US Treasurybecame progressively depleted of its gold. America's gold certificates, coin, and bullionwere continually shipped off to the coffers of various European B anks and Power Elite.In 1933, when the Treasury was drained and the debt was larger than ever (afinancial condition known as " Insolvency"), President Roosevelt proclaimed thebankruptcy of the United States. Every 1 4th Amendment "citizen of the United States "was pledged as an asset to finance the Chapter 1 1 re-organization expenses and payinterest in perpetuity to the CREDITORS (Federal Reserve Bankers) and the "nationaldebt" ( "which shall not be questioned").On March 9, 1 93 3 , Congress passed the Amendatory Act (also known as the EmergencyBanking Relief Act) to the Trading with the Enemy Act (originally passed on October 6,1 9 1 7) at a time when the United States was not in a shooting war with any foreign foethat included the People of the United States as the enemy.At the conference of Governors held on March 6, 1 93 3 , the Governors of the 48 States ofthe Union accommodated the Federal B ankruptcy of the United States Corporation bypledging the faith and credit of their State to the aid of the National Government . . . whichattached to YOU !Senate Document 43 of the 73rd Congress, 1 st Session ( 1 933) did declare that ownershipof ALL PROPERTY is in the STATE and individual so-called ownership is only byvirtue of government, i.e. law amounting to "mere-user" only; and individual use of allproperty is subordinate to the necessities of the United States Government.Under House Joint Resolution 1 92 of June 5, 1 93 3 , Senate Report No. 93549, andExecutive Orders 6072, 60 1 2 and 6246, the Congress and President Roosevelt officiallydeclared bankruptcy of the United States Government.Regardless of the cause or reason, what many American's either do not understand and/orhave failed to seriously grasp, is that by the use of Federal Reserve Notes; (which is notConstitutional Money defined under Article I Section 1 0 of the United StatesConstitution), the People of the United States, since 1 93 3 , have not had anyConstitutionally lawful way to pay their debts. They, therefore, have not had any way tobuy or own property. The People, for the benefits granted to them by a bankruptcorporate Government, discharge their debts with limited liability using Federal ReserveNotes. They have surrendered, by way of an unconscionable contract, any semblance of'Rights ' as exchanges for mere privileges !A review of countless United States Supreme Court decisions since the 1 938, landmarkcase, Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, (304 U . S . 64-92) clearly establishes that only the Statehas Constitutional Rights, not the People. The People have been pledged to thebankruptcy of 1 9 3 3 . The federal law administered in and by the United States is theprivate commercial "law" of the CREDITORS . That, due to the bankruptcy, every"citizen of the United States " is pledged as an asset to support the bankruptcy, must workto pay the insurance premiums on the underwriting necessary to keep the bankruptgovernment in operation under Chapter II Bankruptcy (Reorganization). That upon thedeclared B ankruptcy, Americans could operate and function only through their corporatecolored, State created, ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME, - that has no access tosovereignty, substance, rights, and standing in law. The Supreme Court also held the"general (Universal) common law" no longer is accessible and in operation in the federalcourts based on the 1 933 bankruptcy, which placed everything into the realm of private,colorable law merchant of the Federal Reserve CREDITORS . To take this to a differentlevel, and not only explain why you pay taxes, but also why you do not own the houseyou live in, the car you drive, or own anything else you think you've bought and paid foretc . , you will need to understand that their State Government and its CREDITORS ownit all. If you think you own your home just because you believe you paid for it usingthose Federal Reserve Notes, just like everything else you possess by permission ofGovernment, simply stop paying your taxes, (user-fees and licenses) and see j ust howlong Government and the CREDITORS allow you to keep it before they come to take itaway from you.How can all this really be? Why haven't you been told all of this before now? Ignoranceof the law is no excuse. Every man is deemed (required) to know the law. Governmentexpects you to know the law, and holds you fully accountable for doing so. Ignoringthese facts will not protect you. The majority of American's have been given a Publicgovernment Education to teach them only what the Public, i.e. government(CREDITORS) wants them to know. It is and always has been each individual' s personalresponsibility, duty and obligation to learn and know the law.What this breaks down to is this: B ack in 1 93 3 , when their United States went intobankruptcy because it could no longer pay its debts, it pledged the American People,themselves, without their consent as the asset to keep the government afloat andoperating. B ecause government no longer had any way to pay its debts with substance,and was bankrupt, it lost its sovereignty and standing in law. Outside and separate fromConstitutional Government, to continue to function and operate, it created an artificialworld consisting of artificial entities. This was accomplished by taking everyone's properbirth given name and creating what is called a "fiction in law," by way of an acronym, i.e.a name written in ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS to interact with. A name written in ALLCAPITAL-LETTERS is not a sentient, flesh and blood man. It is a corporation, fictionor deceased person. Government, as well as all corporations, including the InternalRevenue Service, cannot interact with you or interact with you via your proper namegiven you at birth, only through your ALL-CAPITAL-LETTERS-NAME!Another little tidbit of knowledge which has been conveniently kept from the People isthis: When the Several united States signed the treaty with Great Britain ending theRevolutionary War, it was a concession that ALL COMMERCE would be regulated andcontracted through British Attorney's known as Esquires only.This condition and concession still exists today. No attorney or lawyer in the UnitedStates of America has ever been "licensed" to practice law (they've exempted themselves)as they are a legal fiction "person" and only an "ADMITTED MEMBER" to practice inthe private franchise club called the BAR (which is itself an acronym for the British orB arrister Aristocratic Accreditation Regency), and as such are un-registered foreignagents, and so they are traitors. Esquires (Unconstitutional Title of honor and nobility =Esquires), foreign non-citizens (aliens) are specifically prohibited from ever holding any elected Public Office of trust whatsoever ! Article I, Section 9, clause 8, states: "No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatsoever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State . "A s a direct result, attorneys and lawyers cannot and d o not represent you i n your 'Private Capacity. ' Attorneys and lawyers represent corporations, artificial persons, and fictions  - ONLY !

What the majority in this country fail to recognize is this: because of the bankruptcy and having been pledged as an asset to the National Government's debt, this makes all   citizens DEBTORS under Chapter 1 1 . DEBTORS in bankruptcy have lost their solvency,have NO RIGHTS, no STANDING IN LAW, and are at the mercy of the CREDITORS . . . via their attorneys.All courts today sit and operate as Non-Constitutional, Non-Article Three Legislative Tribunals administering the bankruptcy via their " statutes," ("codes. ") All Courts are Title1 1 Bankruptcy Courts where these statutes are, in reality, "commercial obligations" being applied for the "benefit" or "privilege" of discharging debts with limited liability of the Federal Reserve-monopoly, colorable-money Federal Reserve Notes (debt Instruments) .This means every time you end up before a court - not only do you NOT have any standing in law to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, YOU HAVE NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ! Why? Because you are a DEBTOR under the bankruptcy and, in addition to having contracted away your rights in exchange for benefits and privileges, you do not have one single shred of evidence to establish otherwise.In bankruptcy, ONLY CREDITORS have rights! In a nutshell, as a DEBTOR, you have no rights. Rights are reduced to mere privileges which are licensed, regulated, and  can be altered, amended and changed to meet whatever the particular or special needs of their government may be for whatever whim. If taking away your home, your car, taxing your labor, or locking you up for violating any of the Sixty MILLION plus legislatively created DEBTOR codes and statutes they have on the books today happens to meet the needs of their government - it really doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize who the loser will be !

CHANGING YOUR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER

The information that follows may be usefully applied to establish a new Credit File. Readers are

advised to follow all laws and regulations to the letter.

The Social Security Act (P.L. 74-271) was originated in 1935. It imposes taxes to finance a program of

retirement and survivor benefits.

However, one of the laws provision is not so well known or publicized. According to the department of

Health Education and Welfare's publication, "Records, Computers and the Rights of Citizens," the

regulation provided that: "Any employee may have his/her account number changed at any time by

applying to the Social Security Board and showing good reason for a change." With that exception,

only one account number will be assigned to an employee.

The following is an example of one individual who used the above method to change his Social

Security number. This individual, armed with the above information, requested that a new Social

Security number be assigned. The manager at the SSN office had never heard of someone being

assigned a new number; a new name, yes - but a new number, no. The individual explained that under

the law one could have a SSN change if a good reason could be supplied. The good reason this person

supplied was as follows:

Because data banks are currently using SSNs as universal identifiers and because the SSN had been

recorded by the police on the occasion of an arrest, the individual felt that the arrest record would end

up in all those data files, causing embarrassment and economic hardship.

Another plausible reason for requesting a new SSN would be reasonable suspicion that someone else

had appropriated your name and number and is causing you embarrassment and economic hardship.

You can come up with other plausible reasons. This method is available to you but it could take you up

to 90 days to get your new Social Security number. Don't be afraid of the officer at the Social Security

Office. All they can say is no. But if you are insistent, you may get a new Social Security Number.

Then you can follow the steps to set up your NEW Credit File.