MUST READ! Administrative Remedy

Ever heard the statement: "The constitution has NO place in the courts and your life?" When one argues a "Costitutional" position whether in the courts or society that position will NOT prevail. Why? We grew up with the concept of personal freedom and constitutional rights. Yet, even to the most causual observer America is NOT free. The Constitution is NOT in effect in the courts of this land. Ask any judge, he will quickly tell you the constitution is not permitted in his courtroom.

Every company, corporate entity or any organization is governed by a charter, by-laws, or some sort of 'constitution' that will legally dictate and control the operation. Ever stop to consider that if the Constitution is NOT the charter for the Federal government and society what is the "law" of that society?

Then what is the law and 'constitution' of the federal government and society in which we live? The Uniform Commercial Code! If you think that is a stretch of the of the imagination study through the contents of this web site. You will come to a legal understanding of how/why you have become a slave to the society (democracy) around you. Then you will understand how to regain your freedom and 'constitutional' rights.

The only thing prohibiting your freedom is legal awareness and lack of information. ALL; i.e., EVERY thing or action you do is 'commercial'. You can NOT function except through a 'commercial contract'. It is well established that a legal fiction (corporation, government, etc) cannot directly approach a 'private' individual. When government, court, tax, and corporate agents approach you in person, via the mail, over the phone, etc., they are soliciting your consent for "voluntarily" entering into a commercial contract and "doing business." The controlling law for these contracts is the Uniform Commercial Code.

All governments are corporate, for-profit operations. The U.S. [federal] Government and its administrative agencies bring suits against people and other government entities every day. In the legal system there is no difference between civil and criminal jurisdictions; each is commercial. All crime (including murder) is commercial, i.e. has a monetary value affixed thereto. 27 CFR 72.11 spells this out in unequivocal terms. Nowadays it is common for both artificial and flesh-and-blood entities to settle criminal charges out of court, i.e. via payment. [Note: committing a crime is a physical impossibility for an artificial person/corporation, but such are charged criminally almost every day.]

The Uniform Commercial Code at Article 1, §103 it states:

§ 1-103. Supplementary General Principles of Law Applicable.

Unless displaced by the particular provisions of this Act, the principles of law and equity, including the law merchant and the law relative to capacity to contract, principal and agent, estoppel, fraud, misrepresentation, duress, coercion, mistake, Bankruptcy, or other validating or invalidating cause shall supplement its provisions.

What they're telling us is that all other law - common, constitutional, equity, bankruptcy, etc. - is only supplemental to the supreme law of the land - the Uniform Commercial Code. If we don't proceed on the basis upon which they proceed, then we will lose due to failure to procedure, not substance.

A little more.

The information here is compiled right from the UCC Code. Right from the latest changes, and from some of the most powerful codes this planet has ever seen; And I mean planet! In order to understand what it is that we actually do, I need to go back and explain why we're doing what we're doing.

The whole thing started obviously when we had 13 signers to an Original Declaration of Independence. That was an underlying contract that was signed by thirteen different leaders that said "No more." "We are done, we are independent from you. We are going to do our own thing." And that contract led up to another one which is known as the Constitution and another The Bill of Rights etc., etc. etc.. the Articles of the Confederation.

These contracts were what formed a nation here over 200 hundred years ago. It was formed under contract and Sub-formed under codes, rules and regulations. In 1871 the United States set up a system that was called the District of Columbia Organic Act. At that point in time there was only a government and a people, individually based upon the contracts that were written almost a hundred years prior to The Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, etc. etc.. This new act, called the District of Columbia Organic Act created the first Corporate Government that the United States of America has ever seen, and it created a new wild beast that most people don't see. Because it's Corporate America, it has everything to do with commerce; it's under Contract Law. Shortly thereafter, they created what is known as the Bureau of Vital Statistics. The Bureau of Vital Statistics is what formed a birth certificate / chattel paper. This birth certificate was the first time that the United States ever seen a Corporate person known as a Dummy, a strawman, a juristic person or any other kind of fictitious corporation that you can put in your mind and just think about, is a fiction, third party front, a dummy. It is not you, it is a word that reflects chattel paper. It's a contract.

These contracts enabled the Corporate United States to contract with a Corporate U.S. I've heard many people, attended many different seminars, I've read a lot of different information and I've talked to a lot of people who use the UCC. And the UCC is a contract. But, what people have to understand is how they incorporated themselves. They see that one of the biggest problems with some of past or even present information that's out there is a lot of people want to go back to the law. Well, under these contracts that we're speaking of, you became a surety. The surety was responsible to pay for all this Corporation's new existence such as the Federal Reserve, such as the IRS, such as the Social Security Administration. I hope that everyone out there understands why this corporation is starting to exist and how it came about and how they get to us. They don't deal with us, they deal with our Dummies/Strawmans. The fictional you. Your Driver's license, your social security card, most all bills that you get, most anything you get will have your Strawmans name, it's Your name in all capital letters. It is a created US citizen you, Not the Real flesh and blood you. It is your front.

When they started to contract and they switched over our gold, which was in 1933, they took all of our gold and they started using a paper currency. Which is a Federal Reserve note, the dollar bills that we carry around. When they created that new little creature the Corporate America was free to use as much of this paper currency it wanted to. It didn't have to use the gold and silver so it could just exchange promises from one hand to another. Again, all of this you have to sit back and understand that a Corporation is coming after you. Not Mr. General Motors, general motors the nobody. It is just a fiction.

The information that we've gotten and use is compiled from many, many, many years of research, study, trial, and a lot of errors because people can't understand the whole concept behind it, which I couldn't either. I didn't even grasp that at one point in my life. The information that we're going to give you is how to protect yourself, how to make yourself secure from liens, levies, and judgments. How to be able to look at yourself, your spouse and kids and say "I'm free". "Let me do whatever I want to do and I'll be a responsible person and I'll just do it". And it really will change your life forever. Because you will be able to stand there and say "No thank you, I do not want to do business with you." It really is that simple once you understand the concept.

Our concept is not going into court. A lot of people have to, a lot of people wait until the last minute to decide that they have to do something and then they're normally caught in a "fire drill" and that's a lot of times when mistakes are made, because it's so fast, we call this a fire drill. So we're trying to recommend to everybody out there to get your hands on something ahead of time. Do something well in advance before you have a problem and that way you're pretty much protected. And the reason I say that is not to say that "Well, if I start doing this paperwork, am I going to draw attention?" No, the point I am trying to make here is that the percentages of people who have some form of issue, whether it be by a local official, a state official, federal official, your county commissioner, your tax guy, the local cop down on the corner by Dunkin Donuts, everywhere you turn they're asking for money. The bottom line is, you get a speeding ticket, they're asking you for money. Then they want your tax line, you turn here, and they take it out of your paycheck. You turn back this way and they slap you in jail and then take more of it. Then they come take your house. Problems happen to people all the time. If you look at it, the percentage of people that have some form of issue, with any of those agencies is extremely high. And it will probably happen to you sooner or later.

So, what our program does is give you the knowledge and it give you the opinion, education to be able to stop living a life like that and just say, "I want to live my own life." "I don't care about that person there, I care about me and me wants to be free."

That's the way we look at it and I know a lot of other people do too.

The new article 9 provisions inside of this UCC just revolutionized a lot of things and that's what we base our information on. Our information is accurate, up to date and it works. Because if you look inside the Bill of Rights, most people know we got them, but most people don't understand what the two sections are. You have to stand back and look at the overlying contract. Article One through Five are constitutional safeguards. It's says we have the right to speak, we have the right to keep our guns, we have the right. That's the first Five. Well the last Five are against our elected officials saying, "You can't do this, and you can't do that." Well, why is it we can't drive down the road without getting pulled over, asking for money? Because we have contracted our entire lives away and didn't even realize it. We contracted for a house, we contracted for a car, we contracted for a credit card, we contract for everything. You're still a Sovereign human being. You just have to un-contract all the small implied adhesion contracts that you're attached to by your own signature (signature: "the act of putting one's name at the end of an instrument to attest its validity." Black's Law Dict., 6th Ed.; autograph: "one's handwriting; written with one's own hand." ibid.)

So what the UCC does is it actually goes in, it allows you to take those contracts and regain Ownership of those listed properties. Once you have regained control, you can stand up and say, "This is my contract. I don't agree or consent."

The consent thing is a large one. It's something that has worked in all levels; it works everywhere because it is The Law. I'd like to repeat that because it is The Law. When you're looking at a consensual encounter, the first that happens when you get pulled over for instance, what happens to you? What do they do to you? What's the first thing they ask you for? "Can I see your drivers license, registration or can I see your papers?" They are asking you to voluntarily o give them some papers so that they can prosecute you. Why? Because they have the contract and they can do that. You signed that driver's license, you didn't know it, but you signed all your rights away. You didn't even know it.

From the Fourth amendment is where we get this "consent thing." And your Fourth amendment is probably the most powerful amendment, powerful law, and powerful set of words in Law that I can think of. If you have anything that you would like to study on, outside of our website, it should be the Fourth amendment. (Brown vs. TEXAS)

Consent. I do not agree or consent. What they are doing to you is that "They" as a corporation are coming up to you as a corporation and asking you to contract with them. They have no evidence that you are anything but that fiction. "I'm sorry, I don't want to do business with you." And the information works because of the way that the code is set up, it enables you to make claims on your property. That's what the UCC is, so many people that I talk to in the past have said, "You file your UCC and your problems will go away." That is so far from the truth. I don't even want to comment any further than that.

A UCC-1 is an asset protector and it allows you to register property that you are making a claim upon. That is what it is. If there is no claim, you can't claim back on it. So right now, up until this point if you're new to this, you didn't understand any of what we just said, but it's starting to become clear to you now as though it's a corporation against a corporation and you have to step back behind the scene there and realize that the IRS, the State of Michigan, the United States, are all fictions coming after you. They don't exist. You can't call Mr. IRS to the stand in a court room. He won't show up. We've been looking for him for years. We can't find him. We've been looking for another guy called Society, for quite some time, but we can't find him either. They don't exist. So, if they don't exist, then they can't make the claim on the property. You can though. Once you make your claim, You got a claim in there. If anyone was to try to infiltrate your property, NOW you have stated a claim, under which release can be granted to you. You now hold a Superior claim. In the format that we're using this information goes directly at the individuals so to speak, not the IRS, but the agent working for them. The fiction does not exist, only the agents that are "moving" the fiction. What we have to offer is the information that goes to them. It informs them, it lets them know, "I have a claim, please provide me with superior claim if you want me to perform/pay." They do not have it.

A synopsis: There is a corporate government and a real government and they have created a fictional you, which is known as a strawman. And this corporate government is doing just what McDonald's is doing when you pull up to McDonald's. "May I help you?" "Sure, I'll take that, that and that." "OK, that will cost you $5.68". They are conducting business with you. And you have the right to decide whether you want to conduct business with with them. You can do so with whomever you wish to. If you don't wish to do business with somebody, you don't have to. No one can force you to. It is the same concept. It's just we set our groundwork and do our claim ahead of time. We're learning to conduct our commercial affairs for our protection and benefit rather than for the quasi-government's advantage, or any other person's or corporation's benefit.

Filing a UCC-1, [is done thru a FCUSA exclusive online process and NOT filed with the Secretary of State. This keeps the control with you via your agent FCUSA. When you file with the SOS, they keep the ORIGINAL papers and thus retain control of your documents to do as they please not as you please.] The sooner we learn, the more capable we become in protecting ourselves, our families, our property, and our interests. Welcome to the real world! You are coming out of the "reel" world of the "Wizard of Oz" and "Alice in Wonderland.
Once you file your UCC1 "correctly" [GL process] you can begin an Administrative Remedy (AR). An AR is based on Admiralty Law which goes way back and consists of a series of 8 letters which is sent to the CEO of the lending institution that your mortgage [debt; aka credit card, student loan, auto loan, IRS] was filed with. Each of the letters must be noterized prior to being sent and is very precise in wording and content. Basically you first must determine who you wish to file an AR against. This can be any creditor or any lending institution, who committed fraud by obtaining funds, based on the use of your Straw man on the international market. These lending institutions are a legitimate source for an AR.

[In the case of a mortgage, auto loan or student loan, you will need the amount paid to the bank to date (principle, interest and late fees). This is your claim amount.

[In the case of a credit card or line of credit, simply use the highest credit limit given you regardless of balance or amount paid. This is your claim amount.

[The total claim amount for each bank is then multiplied by 4 for compensatory damages, then 200 for punitive damages for a total of 800 times your claim amount. This is your total award amount. At completion of the process, the notarial judgement will be submitted for payment and you will be elligible for a percentage of this total.]

THE HOLY ROMAN CHURCH:

Catholics have always been prohibited from questioning the Pope and the precepts of the Church, for a very good reason, which will be explained as you read on. 

All Pope’s and the privately owned Corporate Holy Roman Church, have always been a major player in shaping World politics; Governments; Commerce and minds, since the early Roman Empire and continues to do so to this date! 

The Roman Church was originally a Pagan Church and remained so under Roman Emperor Constantine.  The advent or appearance of Jesus Christ and His new Christian religious movement called Christianity, and the religious wars that ensued; caused Emperor Constantine to rethink his position as the Pagan Emperor of Rome. 

So, upon the orders of Constantine, at the Council of Nicaea, the Pagan Priests of the Roman Church, were ordered to begin the difficult and tasteless task of attempting to blend Christianity and Paganism together to create one church, to be called: The Holy Roman Church. 

Christ was an unusual man and prophet, with some typical human traits, and at the Council of Nicaea, the Pagan Priests, decided that Christ must be perceived as a living God and as a living God, any suggestion or possibility that Christ took a spouse must be removed from the Scriptures, and thereafter Priests were forbidden to marry.

The Holy Roman Church, actually remained more Pagan than Christian and Emperor Constantine, would eventually submit to what he considered to be, “the indignity of baptism,” just months before his natural death.  Historians for the Vatican made certain that Constantine would be depicted as a reformed man and Christian Emperor but that was not exactly accurate or true!

NOTE: The Pagan influence in The Holy Roman Church, explains the outward discrepancies between the organization of the Church and the Holy Scriptures, such as ostentatious buildings and religious garb; idol worship, purgatory, exorcisms, excommunications, Saints, Demons; the hording of wealth and antiquities, which always existed in the ancient Pagan cult.            

Most people do not know that there are two Popes!  The White Pope is responsible for the administration of the Holy Roman Church and the Black Pope is a Jesuit and mercenary and is responsible for eliminating people and problems affecting the Church, with extreme prejudice!

The Vatican today is a privately owned, corporate, money-driven and self-interested religious cult.  It is a front for the Italian P2 Masonic Lodge or “Illuminati,” which is routinely involved in murder for hire; gambling; pedophile sex and white slavery. 

Vatican City, is one of three privileged and autonomous City States, which also coordinates elite Pan-American global organized crime for the Western Banking Cabal.  The other two City States are:  Washington, D.C. and the City of London. 

The Holy Roman Church, has become identified as the center of the World’s spiritual leadership; the City of London, has become identified as the Center of World Finance, and Washington, D.C., has become identified as the Center of World Military power.  All three are inseparable in philosophy and yet separate, corporate centers in their own right! 

[e.g.] Vatican City is immune from Italian Law; London is immune from British Law; Washington, D.C. is immune from State Law, and all three are collectively the unified center of a Secret Society and Criminal Cabal called, ‘The Illuminati,’ and their headquarters is the United Nations Building in New York City, the proposed Capitol City for their, New World Order.  Proof of both the United Nations and the City of New York, can be located in the United States Code.  

During WWII, the hierarchy of the Vatican, freely supported the Nazi program for World Domination and Pope Pius XII, personally rendered his blessing upon Adolph Hitler, [Baron Rothschild]. 

As mentioned before during this expose’- King George eventually gained control over the new Government of America but he did not lay any new claim to the Colonial land because of another Treaty entered into by his predecessor, King James in 1213.  The Treaty of 1213, was between King James and Pope Innocent III of the Holy Roman Church.  Google: The Treaty of 1213 and read it for yourself.

Like most historic Kings, James was not an intelligent man and was easily manipulated by Pope Innocent III. King James had been excommunicated by the Holy Roman Church because of  having given His Royal Assent to an Aristocratic document titled: THE MAGNA CARTA, which in part recognized the Dukes and Lords as Sovereign and which prevented the return of their estates to the King upon their death.  King James had been forced into signing this document to avert a Rebellion. 

James also realized that the Magna Carta would now deprive him of his income on those estates and there resale upon the death of the Dukes and Lords, so he invoked an ancient law he remembered, titled: THE LAW OF MORTMAIN [or] “the dead mans hand,” which established the basis of the current Probate Courts in America. 

Probate provides for a tax or percentage of the decedents estate be paid to the King, upon the distribution of a dead mans estate and the failure to pay this tax, resulted in the ownership in the estate being sold by the Court, to pay the tax and absent a valid, Last Will and Testament, the estate is returned to the King.  In America, the same laws apply and the estate is returned to the State!

The Magna Carta and The Law of Mortmain, upset Pope Innocent III, because it placed the Lords and Dukes on equal footing with the Sovereign King and His Holiness, the Pope [and] the Law of Mortmain prevented Catholic parishioners from willing the deeds to their homes and land to the Church, by obligating the Church to pay the Kings Probate Tax! 

Pope Innocent III, retaliated by excommunicating King James  and he also issued a decree, declaring that, The Magna Carta, was be an affront to God and the Holy Roman Church, and therefore was unlawful!

King James was eventually convinced by Pope Innocent III, that because of his excommunication, that upon the King’s death, his soul would be condemned to purgatory.  Out of his fear of purgatory, King James, made a serious act of contrition to regain the favor of the Holy Roman Church and the Pope, whom the King now regarded as: God’s only living representative on Earth!

The Treaty of 1213, spelled out King James concessions: 1] Giving the land titles of Ireland; England and France, too the Holy Roman Church;  2] The lands and oceans of the Earth;  3] The payment of 1000 gold Marks each year, and 4] A Royal Decree, which declared the Pope, “The Vicar of Christ,” meaning the only living descendant of Peter, Christ’s appointed representative on Earth!

NOTE:  All royalty is an historic prevarication but man has accepted their presence like a bad government.  Devout Christians might argue this point but realistically, somebody has to be in charge, whomever they are, to maintain order and organize protection from other Nations.    

The Holy Roman Church and all future Pope’s, would all pursue other avenues to gain similar Treaties and control around the World, which is much easier to accomplish if you are the “Vicar of Christ,” and this does however explain England’s historic thirst to conquer other Nation Countries around the World!

King James Royal Decree; that all the lands and sea’s of Earth, was the property of The Holy Roman Church; eventually became the impetus behind the change in American land titles from [Allodial Deeds] to [Fee Simple Deeds], which utilizes the Ancient Roman Trusts as a model! 

THE ANCIENT ROMAN TRUSTS:

Remember the story about crazy Nero setting fire to Rome?  Well it happened but he wasn’t crazy!  He and the Roman Senate arranged that one and blamed it on the Christians as a distraction.  Problem is that the fires were predominately set in the Christian section!  So what was behind this?

After the fires had burned out, the Roman Senate created a Land Trust and into the Trust they entered all of the estates of Romans who owned property.  Then by Royal Decree, they declared that all of these property owners had died in the Great Fire and the Senate was appointed the Trustees for these estates. 

As Trustees, they could demand a percentage of the crops and excessive taxes.  If the owner couldn’t pay, he went to prison or surrendered his daughters as Bond Slaves!  If the original owner died, the estate was sold, usually to a member of the Senate and the gold held in the Trust. 

All that the original estate Owner had to do to stop this insanity, was to hire a scribe and decree that he did not die in the Great Fire and was in fact alive and quite capable of managing his own estate and serve it on the Senate!  Few Romans were intelligent enough to know what to do and subsequently lost everything!

All land deeds in Colonial America, use to be Allodial Deeds, which recognized our individual Sovereignty and Ownership, whereas Fee Simple Deeds, only recognizes the State and are an open end deed that are never closed or finalized! 

What does this mean, you ask?

ALLODIAL:  Recognizes you as the King of your land.  You make the rules on your land and nobody and no government can trespass upon your property.  You the King, are revered and respected and have an absolute right to use lethal force to protect your property.  No government can tax your land, and the title is passed down from parent to child or husband to wife, etc!  No Bank will ever lend money against an Allodial property because the Bank has no way to foreclose against it but it will lend money against your chattel [livestock or crops].

FEE SIMPLE:   Recognizes you only as a Tenant on the property.    The State makes the rules on your land and anybody can trespass upon your property.  You actually lease the property from the Land Trust, which belongs to the Holy Roman Church.  The Deed can only be passed down to family members upon your death but not before your descendants open an, Estate in Probate, which means that the State receives a percentage of everything the decedent once owned!  

If the descendants are short of cash, the property is auctioned off or a loan [mortgage] can be obtained from a Bank.  In a loan situation, the Deed to the property is encumbered by the Bank.  This means that the Bank is entitled to be satisfied first, if the loan [mortgage] is defaulted on for non-payment!  This process is better known as: Foreclosure.  The Banks have arranged for the Vatican, the Judge, the Clerk, the Bank and the lawyer, to each receive a piece of the Foreclosure.

If you are unmarried and you failed to leave a: Last Will and Testament, the State can reclaim your property and leave your descendants with nothing!

With this change in Deeds:  A Land Trust was created for these Fee Simple Deeds, and the Holy Roman Church was designated the Owner of the Trust.  The State and the Courts become the Trustees, and we Americans become a corporate tenant. 

Now here’s where things get sticky: 

In every Trust:  There is an Owner; a Trustee and a Beneficiary.  The Owner cannot be the Trustee and neither of them can become the Beneficiary, so we ignorant human beings, have been appointed as the Beneficiaries of the Trust!   Into the Trust they have entered other valuable property.  Birth Certificates of Corporations, our Birth Certificates and our Social Security Accounts, which are converted into National Securities and marketed as Mutual Fund Investments.

The trick: The trick is how too avoid giving these ignorant humans the benefits of the Trust?  And the solution arrived at by these lawyer/politicians, is to convert those ignorant humans into sub-corporations!  Corporations are companies and as such, have no inalienable rights!  You’ve got to admit that these people are clever?

American’s who believe they have just purchased a home and land, have been lied to by the government; the bank and their lawyer!  They all lie as a precaution against inciting another American Revolution!  Everything is about Commerce/Money!  

It rules the World and it Rules your lives!

In the small type of all Fee Simple Deeds; is the wording that  specifies that the buyer is the Tenant and not the Owner!  Your lawyer set up that little piece of fraud, never told you about it and then charged you a fee for his services!  

And America keeps electing these lawyers to high political offices and you wonder why your life is so much harder today than it was for your parents?  Hell—they were just getting started!   

That’s not all:  In the small print of the Deed is a poorly worded contract between you and the State Government, wherein you consent to pay the property taxes on this Deed and directs the State too send the Tax Notice in care of your name and address and by signing all of the Deed transactions, you have agreed to another fraudulent debt!  The Tax Debt guarantees that you can never own or reside on that property without paying!  Whatever happened to that “nest egg” we were taught to believe in?

Your lawyer set up that Tax Debt too and he receives a large percentage of your first tax bill, for arranging that one!

  

CAVEAT EMPTOR

 “Let the buyer beware!”

Beware of the politicians and lawyers!

The Ecclesiastical Laws of England; Ireland; France and America, now give the Pope absolute superiority over all governmental laws, decisions and orders governing these countries.  That would normally be a reasonable concession to God however the Vatican is a cult and is all about:  Power; Control and Wealth, masked by the veil of a National Religious Cult, supervised by the false, Vicar of Christ! 

                                         

In all fairness: Many of the individual parish Priests are gentle, religious and well-meaning people who are just as confused about everything, as you are. 

It is the Jesuits and the Priests who are promoted to Bishop and Cardinal, who you need to be wary of.  They are generally more politically aggressive and corrupt than they are religious!  Didn’t you ever wonder why Priests are never prosecuted for Pedophile Sex or Drunken Driving? 

It is because the Vatican is at the center of the Illuminati P2 Group and that is part of their business; the Vatican is in bed with them and the Pope can exonerate everybody and absolve them of their crimes and sins. Priestly perversions make it virtually impossible for a fallen Priest to ever leave the Church because once he does; he is no longer protected by the Church!  Every time a Priest slips up, the Pope gains a permanent soldier who cannot refuse a Vatican accommodation!

NOTE: The United States Congress adopted The Holy Bible as one of the organic laws of the United States.  Organic means a foundational law.  What Pope Innocent III missed during his editing of the Holy Bible, is the fact that the Bible eliminates enforcement of all man-made laws in the first five books, which then becomes another prime example of how the laws of a corrupt government contradict each other, and as long as they are in power, they don’t care!    

Remember the proverb: 

“Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely!”

Nothing could be more truthful!  In all fairness, you all need to know that [except for about one half dozen] of the men who we have elected too a State or National political office, are actually much more corrupt than any of you ever imagined!  They have sex slaves; perform mind control experiments upon them; take drugs; arrange murders; engage in pedophile sex; prostitution and have been involved in white slavery and the sale of children and teenagers to foreign Potentates! Anything for a buck and for their personal pleasure, with absolutely no accountability or conscience!  They are the true Sociopaths of this society and should be in prison, and I am not excluding any of the United States Presidents; Congressmen or Heads of State in this description!  Except for those six; there wasn’t a good one among them and that’s the absolute truth! 

They are only half at fault because we stupid American’s put them there and never paid any attention to what they were doing and we accepted every lie they told us!

SLAVE DRIVING: The High Contracting Powers in Europe and America have decided that we common, illiterate and unwashed slaves are better off not having this and other knowledge or information readily available to us because that would make us all as intelligent as they are, and that could make us difficult to control! 

Intelligent slaves have always been perceived as a threat to Plantation owners; Emperors; Monarchs; Dictators and other despots and we common folk are perceived by them in this same light.  As hard and tasteless as this comment is to digest, the middle and poor classes are viewed by all governments and by the Royal and Elite of the World as ignorant slaves that require management, by and through slave driving program techniques. 

Too many slaves are much too difficult to control and so programs to reduce populations in addition to Wars, have constantly been engineered and employed without our consent or knowledge! 

[e.g.]  Hence, the recent growing number of Cancer and Aids patients and other diseases, which have been created by government laboratories under Military Defense Contracts, were then introduced into our society by air, water and contaminated blood. 

[e.g.]  During WWII, Nazi scientists experimented with a toxic substance called fluoride and discovered that watered down doses of fluoride ingested over a long period of time, makes the human mind more malleable or easier to influence.  Other tests involving an acid compound called chlorine, ingested in small doses over an extended period of time, severely injures the human immune system.  Today all public water in America is treated with Chlorine and Fluoride chemicals and we have all been told for the last 70 years that this is good for us!

[e.g.]  All humans should actually be ingesting small doses of Alkaloids applied or added to their boiled drinking water to maintain their natural immunity from childbirth.  All human children are born with an alkaloid system however due to the health benefits derived from Alkaloids, the US Government has prohibited the sale of all water purification devices that Alkalizes drinking water.  The abuse of Alkaloids however like all abuses is just as detrimental to human health as acids and poison; so care should be employed.  China or Japan manufactures an alkaloid purification system, which can be purchased by mail order only.

Another popular Slave Driving Technique involves racial disunity. Kings and Governments intentionally stir up problems between the various countries and races, which causes fights and murders between these groups and once they get out of control, Officials step in and kill or imprison everyone they can.  At present the big move is to create racial disunity between the American masses and immigrants from the Middle Eastern Countries or with the Latin and South America ethnicities. 

If you are one of those American people who hate the Mexican and or the Muslim immigrants in America, then you are probably not too awfully bright because you are being handled and manipulated by Uncle Sam with extreme prejudice!  The same thing was done to Japanese American families during WWII and they were totally innocent of any wrongdoing!

OTHER SLAVE DRIVING PROGRAMS: 

Most people actively participate and cooperate in these slave driving programs.  I’m certain you won’t like reading this but the most identifiable programs involve our professional sports competitions such as: Football; Baseball; Wrestling, etc.  Team sports are much easier to manipulate because they involve so much activity whereas, Wrestling is the only sport that appears phony all of the time, even when participants are paid extra, to physically assault each other! 

Just so you understand, all of these professional athletes truly are the consummate athletes in their own right, and it really would be quite a spectacle to watch them legitimately attempt to win a competition but, it could also result in their last and cost them a profitable career; so games; matches and coaches need to be manipulated!  The offer of large salaries helps smooth over the athlete’s conscience and in time they lose their conscience, just like actors and politicians!  Sorry to break your bubble but that’s life and they and we are being manipulated!

All of the players occasionally suffer real injuries from accidents but it still amounts to nothing more than the glitz and glimmer of Hollywood, just on a different plane or level!  The purpose of these professional sports is too entertain the masses and to inflate and expand Commerce.  It’s all about the money.

Unfortunately, the public is bamboozled into paying horrendous prices to view these sports competitions; they are huddled into stadiums with uncomfortable seating and sometimes exposed to the elements!  They are usually offered expensive refreshments to purchase and members of the public are encouraged or enticed to wager bets on the outcome of each competition! 

The team owners receive a percentage of those bets in exchange for a pre-arranged list of win’s and losses; a percentage of the ticket sales, concessions, television advertisements and merchandizing!  The owners even attempt to perform like they are elated or concerned but its all an act!  It’s all about the money!

Former athletes are hired by the media to discuss the players; teams; forecast the outcome and narrate the competitions.  These star narrators help add more drama to the game and they help cover up “bad acting” and “botched plays” by legitimizing or chastising the actions of plays, referees, coaches and players who react, get kicked out, strike out, miss a shot, push an opponent, miss a block or drop a pass!  It’s all good because drama sells tickets, increases betting and sells merchandise and we pay the price!

The success of these professional programs also encourages high schools and colleges to entertain similar athletic programs because of the extra collateral that can be earned for the schools and they unwittingly help to legitimize the professional sports.  High schools and college teams play legitimate sports, so naturally those spectators are more likely to expect and believe the same amount of legitimacy will continue in the professional sports too.

All of these sports promote combat, competition and separate and eliminate the weak from the strong.  Strong slaves are more productive, it’s a fact!  These sport competitions help drive the public mind to pay little attention to what government and business is doing too them; and they help promote sales, patriotism and loyalty before each competition!  All of this creates and sustains a multi-billion dollar commercial enterprise and government from which the Royal and Elite classes all profit! 

CREDIT SCORES: I believe you first need to understand the purpose behind Credit Scores.  The Credit Scoring System is another slave driving program; that was devised by the Federal Reserve System and with the blessing of the High Contracting Powers.  Its purpose is to squeeze more cash out of borrowers and to force the public into becoming loyal conditioned slaves! 

First of all, when you apply for a mortgage, you are requesting a loan of their valueless currency, to purchase a home or automobile, which you can never own and upon which you pay a penalty, called Interest and Costs.  Those who are approved for a loan are watched closely to see if they have swallowed the fraud, “hook, line and sinker” and follow the repayment instructions fully! 

Those who can’t follow their directions; lost a job or financially over extended themselves are rated badly [credit scores] and are penalized severely then and whenever they apply again, called [points]. 

The personal information you provide to them when applying, is also sold to other Financial Institutions and Collection Agencies. They tell you NO, but unless you take the time to read all the fine print, they bluffed you again!  

Some merchandizing companies have or perform a type of collection process first as a courtesy and when you fail to bring your payments up to date, they discharge the debt and sell the discharged debt to Collection Agencies for pennies on the dollar! 

These Collection Agencies are all owned by Law Firms who hire people to contact you and attempt to collect the original debt plus penalties for them.  They do not represent the merchandizing company, they represent their own business and probably paid $25.00 for a $300.00 discharged debt.  If they can persuade you to begin making payments too them, that creates a contract between you and the collection agency, regarding a debt that no longer exists!  When a debt is discharged, it means that your agreement with that company is cancelled for good! Those lawyers really are pretty clever! 

If you are a compliant slave, your credit rating will be high and yet their really isn’t a difference between the borrower who has perfect credit and the borrower who has poor credit, as I will discuss next under Home Mortgages!  It is all a corporate fraud to increase their wealth and deplete yours!

HOME MORTGAGES:  Whenever you apply for a loan, you are requested to sign a Promissory Note for the total amount of the loan.  Then a Payment Account is established.  The Promissory Note is never endorsed by a member of the Financial Institution so that it can be sold without your permission.  Three days later, the original promissory note, signed in ink, is sold to another Institution or Foreign Government, who will COLLATERALIZE it or use it like a BOND and issue currency or loans against it. 

Why the three days? It is because you have the right to withdraw from or cancel any contract within three days of acceptance.  It is about the only right we have left and it may be found under the, Truth in Lending Act!

All that matters to the Bank, is that you are a flesh and blood human being and that you have affixed your signature to a Promissory Note!  They don’t care if you have a great credit score or a poor one!  Flesh and Blood Human Beings, technically own everything, and all Corporations are fictional companies that have no value and cannot function until some HUMAN BEING blows life into them!  The Promissory Notes each sell for the same value!

Since the Promissory Note was sold without your permission, your Mortgage Debt to them is actually [paid in full] but they never tell you about that!  In fact, the Bank also sells your repayment plan to an investor or another Bank for much less, and agree to manage the payments for them.  Most Banks now employ a middle company to collect your Mortgage payment.  They do this because your Mortgage and repayment plan is not reflected on the Banks Bookkeeping and under Federal and International Law, it is supposed to!  So the middle companies act as a buffer and keeps them out of trouble!   

Since the Banks can’t legally make loans against their depositor’s assets, everything is just a, Paper Chase!  Your payments are deposited into the investor’s account who purchased it and if it involves another Bank, your payment is transferred to that Bank where it is deposited into a savings account, under a number instead of your name!  

The reason the account is numbered, is because it is really your savings account!  You don’t owe them a debt and so they conceal your payments as a numbered savings account!  If they included your name, they would have to mail you a monthly accounting and that would tip you off!

So any foreclosure that might occur thereafter is totally bogus and unlawful because they cannot produce the Original Promissory Note!  If demanded, they will produce a black and white photo copy but that is actually the Counterfeiting of a Negotiable Instrument unless it is reduced or enlarged!  The point being that if they cannot produce the original Note, it was sold! 

Given these circumstances, it was absolutely necessary for them to involve the Judges in their criminal conduct.  Foreclosure Judges receive 10% of the original Promissory Note, after they authorize the Bank to steal and sell your assets in FORECLOSURE.

This process essentially makes the rich man richer and explains how the Banks can own the bulk of the skyscraper buildings, parcels of land and stadiums across America.  In reality, we pay for our homes three times over its original purchase price without ever securing ownership.  Mr. Warburg was a pretty ingenious fellow when he designed the Federal Reserve System and why we Americans always need to be two steps ahead of the Banks, Courts and lawyers!

 

According to the Constitution:  The only way you can pay a debt is with silver or gold and since there is no silver or gold backed currency, the only thing we can do is to DISCHARGE our debts!  A DISCHARGE is never a payment in full and it can be resold or borrowed against.  Hence, lawyers purchase discharged debts for pennies on the dollar; open a collection company and hire people to harass you into paying that debt to them! 

Remember that in all legitimate contracts you always received something of equal value from the company or person you borrowed from.  Collection companies fail to provide you with anything of equal value and lie to you that they are collecting the debt on behalf of the original creditor! 

The best way to handle a debt collector is to deny who you are and every question they ask …..

INTERESTING NOTE:  In Libya, a citizen can apply for a home mortgage or business loan from the government, interest free, and he owns the land.  In most cases, a citizen who desires to start a business like farming, the borrower is given a $50,000 grant or the land, a tractor, the seed and livestock to get started all for free!  And our government has the audacity to call Momar Ghaddafi a fascist?  President Ghaddafi had control over $200 Billion in gold and his life was threatened by the Criminal Cabal, if he refused to surrender that gold.  Ghaddafi refused and was subsequently murdered by paid assassins hired by the United States Government.  May he rest in peace…

CORPORATIONS: As I mentioned earlier, a corporation is a fictional character or entity in law, created by the government, which makes that fictional character or entity the intellectual property of the government but you are never told that!  Corporations can own any number of other corporations but can never own a flesh and blood human being! 

All laws created under this parent corporation will essentially become corporate laws and regulations to govern the parent corporation and all subordinate or sub-corporations owned by the parent.  These corporate laws and regulations are called statutes and their affect and control over human beings is deceptively obtained by consent through civil contracts.  Look up the word: Person, in any modern law dictionary and you will see that a person is regarded as a corporation and not a flesh and blood human being.

These civil contracts were secured by and through several federal and state voluntary registration programs designed to convert and enslave flesh and blood American citizens of the Republic into corporate property. These registration programs always involved government benefits as an inducement however nothing is for free and when the State and Federal Governments offer anything for free, you can bet that upon your acceptance, there are ropes and chains about to be attached to your neck; hands and ankles! 

‘Most people do not know the weight of chain they already bare!’  Charles Dickens

Legally, these civil contracts lacked “mutuality,” meaning that all registrants must understand the true nature and intent of the contract [and] subsequently must knowingly accept or consent to the terms of those contracts.  The government’s subversive tactics perverts “mutuality” and lawfully eliminates any and all contractual relationships, as historically established by the ‘International Law of Contracts’ a/k/a Uniform Commercial Code.’ 

The Federal Government; the B.A.R. and the Courts, rely upon the Maxim that: “Ignorance of the Law is no excuse,” which is capable of being thrown back in their deceptive faces through literacy, which is what this expose’ is attempting to provide to you!

When a person is arrested or sued for a Statutory Regulation, also known as a: Criminal or Civil law, he is actually being accused of violating a: corporate regulation or corporate breach of contract!  A civil contract that only exists over human beings by deception and fraud! 

There are NO CRIMINAL LAWS in America.  Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Procedure [F.C.R.P.] use to specify this very fact. [e.g.] ‘All laws are civil,’ which was later modified by the Judiciary Act too conceal this fact by creating one set of Civil Rules [F.C.R.P.] and one set of Criminal Rules [F.Cr.R.P.] but this never changed the fact that there are NO CRIMINAL LAWS in America. 

The Judiciary Act was necessary, once common people began to represent themselves in Court and uncovered this and other frauds. 

These Rules of Procedure and Rules of Court were originally designed and adopted to reduce confusion in the Courts and was intended only for lawyers however this is not to say that the Courts will not try to enforce them against non-lawyers! 

And by the way: There is no legislation, which prohibits a common man to practice law without a license!  Neither Lincoln nor Clarence Darrow ever attended law school; neither was licensed and each became a famous lawyer.  This prohibition will be discussed next.

Today, each Judge representing a Court of Record is a lawyer and a member of the American B.A.R. Association Union, and all these Union Judges have conspired to write a Local Rule of Procedure, prohibiting non-lawyers from the practice of law without a license!  This practice protected their Treason; insured work for the Union membership [B.A.R. lawyers] and is openly in violation of Federal Anti-Trust Laws! 

Anti-Trust Laws were intended to prevent large monopolies from forming because such monopolies can control prices; eliminate competition and violates free enterprise, which is exactly what the B.A.R. and this Local Rule of Court intended to accomplish!  Those Anti-Trust Laws have been modified so many times by B.A.R. Congressmen, that they now almost assist in the creation of large monopolies.  Gee, how could that happen?

A lawyer is issued a license to practice law, a license permitting him to do something unlawful, so how did he pay for his license when our government has abolished our right to possess or own silver and gold?  The lawyer paid with Federal Reserve Notes [promissory notes] having no ascertainable value.  So now, how is it that any lawyer is licensed to do anything?  They aren’t; so when a lawyer or a lawyer judge enters a Court, they both come into that Court with unclean hands to prosecute; defend or judge.

“Unclean hands,” means that: Their appearance is reproachable and it makes them incapable of seeking or rendering a judgment or a conviction against anyone else!  An old Maxim of law says it all:

“FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING.”

The Federal and State Governments are not real.  They are privately owned corporations called governments.  The Judges are privately employed administrators called Judges and the law is nothing more than their corporate regulations called Statutes.  The Courthouses are no longer public buildings but are privately owned structures called Judicial Centers or a Department of Justice and the prisons are privately owned facilities that do not mention the City or County anywhere in its name. 

The public defenders, prosecutors and police are not there to protect and serve the public but to the contrary, they are there to protect and serve the private corporation. 

The Vatican, Judges, Prosecutor and Clerk make money off of your conviction and the private owners of the prison make money off of your incarceration.  Everything you sign with a wet ink signature becomes a negotiable instrument in their World and is converted into a guaranteed asset, like a [Security or Bond] because you are a real flesh and blood living person!  Many Judges and law firms own the Government Buildings and the Prisons. 

Your presence in a prison also fuels a Mutual Fund investment.  In their World, everything is fictional and therefore your living status creates substance for their World both physically and in writing!

Who pays for the bulk of these convictions?

Remember those Land Trusts in the name of the Vatican?  The Prosecutor levels [files] a charge against you and the Trust, with the Clerk.  The Clerk documents the case and appoints a judge as the Administrator for the Trust.  You are brought before them and asked if you are the named person on the indictment and they promptly advise you of your rights and the charge. 

It is your BIRTH CERTIFICATE that is actually on Trial and being prosecuted, but you don’t know that and your Court appointed lawyer or privately hired lawyer, never tell you! 

Upon your conviction and you will be convicted; the Land Trust pays damages to all involved except you, because you are not real!  The living you is the beneficiary of the Trust and the corporate you is on Trial!  They consider that those Trusts are for them, if they can access it!  You never receive the benefits of the Trust and you are sentenced to prison, probation and or fined! 

Rebellious or free thinking individuals are usually ostracized; censored; punished or stone walled at every turn because they refuse to accept the propaganda and slave driving techniques being forced upon them by their private corporate owners called the High Contracting Powers! 

We are all forced to submit to a forced education wherein the subject content has been fictionalized and is supervised by the: “Department of Education.” We are periodically tested and graded to insure that we have been sufficiently indoctrinated with these facts before being graduated.  The “Carrot” or rewards used to entice us into memorizing these false facts are words like: Cum Lade, Diplomas, Intelligence Quotients, College Entrance Exams, Stats and rewards like educational scholarships, grants and the promise of a better job and life!  And few ever receive the:  “Carrot!”

You are never taught the truth unless you are Royalty; the Elite or you are a Specially Gifted Individual.  Naturally high intelligence [genius status] is an asset to the Elite and the Royal factions, and besides, you probably will figure everything out for yourself, and so they encourage such children to join them!  Those who refuse are eventually eliminated with prejudice.

PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES:  Is another one of the largest scams in America!  The Congress and the Department of Defense poisons us and the pharmaceutical companies provide drugs that treat the symptoms.  They own all of the Medical Schools and make sure that new Doctors never learn how to treat disease only the symptom.  When it was discovered that the juice of the Marijuana Plant [Hemp Oil] stimulated the Human Immune System, which in turn naturally eliminated every disease affecting the human body; the Congress made Marijuana a Schedule I Drug and the propagation, use or sale of it a felony crime!  

Use a juicer to extract the juice.  It will not make you hallucinate unless you heat or smoke it because heat changes the chemical composition. 

These companies make billions off of the medical profession and they kick back a large portion of the profits to every Congressman and President!  Everything is about Commerce!

END

Your so-called right to vote in America is actually about slave registration.

Every applicant is asked if they are a United States Citizen or other.  A US Citizen is defined in all law dictionaries as a corporate entity.  Your vote really means nothing during an election because the electronic voting machines are rigged; the manual tabulation process was eliminated via the BUSH v. GORE elections as unreliable and besides the Electoral College actually chooses the candidates regardless of the vote count!  This was the real reason behind the creation of the Electoral College!  The whole BUSH v. GORE event that occurred in Florida was a well planned and staged event to eliminate the paper ballot cards and manual tabulation.   

The use of racist remarks and displays of racism is also planned by the Royal and Elite to divert attention away from their true purpose!  Racism is used heavily and well in America to divert the attention of the masses because most of us are very easily distracted!  The real truth is that there is no difference between the masses but as a collective group, the Slave Drivers couldn’t control us and so racism is used to, “divide and conquer” the slaves!    

The Federal Government’s usual motive of operation is to cause a problem; blow it out of proportion in the media and then provide for and adopt a remedy that only they can control!  This is never the “Exception” but rather the “Rule” and each time a little more of our humanity and liberty is subtly stolen by government without the public ever taking notice of it!  Most people are easily entertained and distracted, which is the same reason why people are so fascinated with Magicians and Hypnotists!  

America’s judiciary are smaller corporate branches called courts.  The judges are actually business administrators called judges and all of America’s laws are civil corporate regulations called statutes.  People are treated as corporations in these courts and these so-called bastions of justice are all about commerce and fraud!  

Everyone needs to be on the same page and so precedents become their safety benchmark!  

This next question doesn’t constitute any proof but think about this: If American judges truly are the “Good Guys,” why don’t they all wear white robes instead of black?  The answer is: Because black is the pagan traditional color for Illuminati Priests, which will make more sense to you as you read on through this expose.  

The local police and prosecutors are not in place to, “serve and protect” the American public but to the contrary, they are structured to protect the Slave Drivers and the private United States Corporation, by enforcing its corporate statutes against the corporate enemy, “The American citizen.”  Most of these police officers haven’t a clue about how they have been indoctrinated and manipulated!  They are so naïve and well-meaning that they actually believe they are preserving and protecting the public!  The politicians, prosecutors, judges, priests and clerks know the truth and many of them increase their personal spoils with every conviction!  Yes, the Vatican, judges, prosecutors and clerks make money off of every conviction and lawsuit and their clearing house for all of these private spoils is located in the Texas Federal Reserve, under an account titled:  “THE CHRIS FUND!”  

 

If our police officers would simply invest a little energy and time, to research and read something other than PLAYBOY or POPULAR MECHANICS or to hoist a few at the local police pub, they would discover that the amended version of the: “Trading with the Enemy Act of 1933,” by President Franklin D. Roosevelt, specifically identifies the

 American citizen as the enemy of the Federal Government!  The fraud and deception perpetrated by these Slave Drivers works well, as long as they can maintain their deception and manipulation over the masses! 

 

In fact and in reality, the historic civilian government promised by: “The Constitution of the United States of America,” never existed nor did it ever have a chance of succeeding, courtesy of President George Washington and the Continental Congress! President George Washington, “the reputed father of our country,” cleverly overthrew the organic Constitution of the United States of America, using the Articles of Confederation and then reinstated the privately owned colonial corporation of: “The Virginia Colony.”    

He then installed a military government, which is concealed in plain site. [e.g.] COMMANDER in CHIEF; Attorney GENERAL; Secretary GENERAL; Auditor GENERAL; Surgeon GENERAL; Postmaster GENERAL, etc.  The Constitution was a well written document, which was copied from the Iroquois Federation Government!  Many of the safeguards found in the organic Constitution were added by the Founding Fathers to bind the hands of the other Delegates because none of them trusted each other, which proves the old Proverb that: 

 “There is no honor among thieves!” 

The IRS is a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico

Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?

Answer:  No.  The IRS is not an organization within the United States Department of the Treasury.  The U.S. Department of the Treasury was organized by statutes now codified in Title 31 of the United States Code, abbreviated “31 U.S.C.”  The only mention of the IRS anywhere in 31 U.S.C. §§ 301‑315 is an authorization for the President to appoint an Assistant General Counsel in the U.S. Department of the Treasury to be the Chief Counsel for the IRS.  See 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2).

At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D.  The Guarantee Clause in the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats).  See Article IV, Section 4.  Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.

2.      If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?

Answer:  The IRS appears to be a collection agency working for foreign banks and operating out of Puerto Rico under color of the Federal Alcohol Administration (“FAA”).  But the FAA was promptly declared unconstitutional inside the 50 States by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of U.S. v. Constantine, 296 U.S. 287 (1935), because Prohibition had already been repealed.

In 1998, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit identified a second “Secretary of the Treasury” as a man by the name of Manual Díaz-Saldaña.  See the definitions of “Secretary” and “Secretary or his delegate” at 27 CFR 26.11 (formerly 27 CFR 250.11), and the published decision in Used Tire International, Inc. v. Manual Díaz-Saldaña, court docket number 97‑2348, September 11, 1998.  Both definitions mention Puerto Rico.

When all the evidence is examined objectively, IRS appears to be a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq. (“RICO”).  Think of Puerto RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act);  in other words, it is an organized crime syndicate operating under false and fraudulent pretenses.  See also the Sherman Act and the Lanham Act.


3.      By what legal authority, if any, has the IRS established offices inside the 50 States of the Union?

Answer:  After much diligent research, several investigators have concluded that there is no known Act of Congress, nor any Executive Order, giving IRS lawful jurisdiction to operate within any of the 50 States of the Union.

Their presence within the 50 States appears to stem from certain Agreements on Coordination of Tax Administration (“ACTA”), which officials in those States have consummated with the Commissioner of Internal Revenue.  A template for ACTA agreements can be found at the IRS Internet website and in the Supreme Law Library on the Internet.

However, those ACTA agreements are demonstrably fraudulent, for example, by expressly defining “IRS” as a lawful bureau within the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  (See Answer to Question 1 above.)  Moreover, those ACTA agreements also appear to violate State laws requiring competitive bidding before such a service contract can be awarded by a State government to any subcontractor.  There is no evidence to indicate that ACTA agreements were reached after competitive bidding processes;  on the contrary, the IRS is adamant about maintaining a monopoly syndicate.


4.      Can IRS legally show “Department of the Treasury” on their outgoing mail?

Answer:  No.  It is obvious that such deceptive nomenclature is intended to convey the false impression that IRS is a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury.  Federal laws prohibit the use of United States Mail for fraudulent purposes.  Every piece of U.S. Mail sent from IRS with “Department of the Treasury” in the return address, is one count of mail fraud.  See also 31 U.S.C. 333.

5.      Does the U.S. Department of Justice have power of attorney to represent the IRS in federal court?

Answer:  No.  Although the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) does have power of attorney to represent federal agencies before federal courts, the IRS is not an “agency” as that term is legally defined in the Freedom of Information Act or in the Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of all federal Territories are expressly excluded from the definition of federal “agency” by Act of Congress.  See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).

Since IRS is domiciled in Puerto Rico (RICO?), it is thereby excluded from the definition of federal agencies which can be represented by the DOJ.  The IRS Chief Counsel, appointed by the President under authority of 31 U.S.C. 301(f)(2), can appear, or appoint a delegate to appear in federal court on behalf of IRS and IRS employees.  Again, see the Answer to Question 1 above.  As far as powers of attorney are concerned, the chain of command begins with Congress, flows to the President, and then to the IRS Chief Counsel, and NOT to the U.S. Department of Justice.


6.      Were the so-called 14th and 16th amendments properly ratified?

Answer:  No.  Neither was properly ratified.  In the case of People v. Boxer (December 1992), docket number #S-030016, U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer fell totally silent in the face of an Application to the California Supreme Court by the People of California, for an ORDER compelling Senator Boxer to witness the material evidence against the so-called 16th amendment.

That so‑called “amendment” allegedly authorized federal income taxation, even though it contains no provision expressly repealing two Constitutional Clauses mandating that direct taxes must be apportioned.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and the U.S. Supreme Court have both ruled that repeals by implication are not favored.  See Crawford Fitting Co. et al. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 442 (1987).

The material evidence in question was summarized in AFFIDAVITs that were properly executed and filed in that case.  Boxer fell totally silent, thus rendering those affidavits the “truth of the case.”  The so‑called 16th amendment has now been correctly identified as a major fraud upon the American People and the United States.  Major fraud against the United States is a serious federal offense.  See 18 U.S.C. 1031.

Similarly, the so-called 14th amendment was never properly ratified either.  In the case of Dyett v. Turner, 439 P.2d  266, 270 (1968), the Utah Supreme Court recited numerous historical facts proving, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that the so‑called 14th amendment was likewise a major fraud upon the American People.

Those facts, in many cases, were Acts of the several State Legislatures voting for or against that proposal to amend the U.S. Constitution.  The Supreme Law Library has a collection of references detailing this major fraud.

The U.S. Constitution requires that constitutional amendments be ratified by three-fourths of the several States.  As such, their Acts are governed by the Full Faith and Credit Clause in the U.S. Constitution.  See Article IV, Section 1.

Judging by the sheer amount of litigation its various sections have generated, particularly Section 1, the so‑called 14th amendment is one of the worst pieces of legislation ever written in American history.  The phrase “subject to the jurisdiction of the United States” is properly understood to mean “subject to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress.”  (See Answer to Question 19 below.)

For this one reason alone, the Congressional Resolution proposing the so-called 14th amendment is provably vague and therefore unconstitutional.  See 14 Stat. 358-359, Joint Resolution No. 48, June 16, 1866.

7.      Where are the statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes?

Answer:  Section 1 of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) contains no provisions creating a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A.  Aside from the statutes which apply only to federal government employees, pursuant to the Public Salary Tax Act, the only other statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes are those itemized in the definition of “Withholding agent” at IRC section 7701(a)(16).  For example, see IRC section 1461.  A separate liability statute for “employment” taxes imposed by subtitle C is found at IRC section 3403.

After a worker authorizes a payroll officer to withhold taxes, typically by completing Form W‑4, the payroll officer then becomes a withholding agent who is legally and specifically liable for payment of all taxes withheld from that worker’s paycheck.  Until such time as those taxes are paid in full into the Treasury of the United States, the withholding agent is the only party who is legally liable for those taxes, not the worker.  See IRC section 7809 (“Treasury of the United States”).

If the worker opts instead to complete a Withholding Exemption Certificate, consistent with IRC section 3402(n), the payroll officer is not thereby authorized to withhold any federal income taxes.  In this latter situation, there is absolutely no liability for the worker or for the payroll officer;  in other words, there is no liability PERIOD, specifically because there is no withholding agent.

8.      Can a federal regulation create a specific liability, when no specific liability is created by the corresponding statute?

Answer:  No.  The U.S. Constitution vests all legislative power in the Congress of the United States.  See Article I, Section 1.  The Executive Branch of the federal government has no legislative power whatsoever.  This means that agencies of the Executive Branch, and also the federal Courts in the Judicial Branch, are prohibited from making law.

If an Act of Congress fails to create a specific liability for any tax imposed by that Act, then there is no liability for that tax.  Executive agencies have no authority to cure any such omission by using regulations to create a liability.

“[A]n administrative agency may not create a criminal offense or any liability not sanctioned by the lawmaking authority, especially a liability for a tax or inspection fee.”  See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 4 L.Ed.2d 127, 80 S.Ct. 144 (1959), and Independent Petroleum Corp. v. Fly, 141 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1944) as cited at 2 Am Jur 2d, p. 129, footnote 2 (1962 edition) [bold emphasis added].  However, this cite from American Jurisprudence has been removed from the 1994 edition of that legal encyclopedia.


9.      The federal regulations create an income tax liability for what specific classes of people?

Answer:  The regulations at 26 CFR 1.1-1 attempted to create a specific liability for all “citizens of the United States” and all “residents of the United States”.  However, those regulations correspond to IRC section 1, which does not create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A.

Therefore, these regulations are an overly broad extension of the underlying statutory authority; as such, they are unconstitutional, null and void ab initio (from the beginning, in Latin).  The Acker case cited above held that federal regulations can not exceed the underlying statutory authority.  (See Answer to Question 8 above.)


10.     How many classes of citizens are there, and how did this number come to be?

Answer:  There are two (2) classes of citizens:  State Citizens and federal citizens.  The first class originates in the Qualifications Clauses in the U.S. Constitution, where the term “Citizen of the United States” is used.  (See 1:2:2, 1:3:3 and 2:1:5.)  Notice the UPPER-CASE “C” in “Citizen”.

The pertinent court cases have defined the term “United States” in these Clauses to mean “States United”, and the full term means “Citizen of ONE OF the States United”.  See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870);  Judge Pablo De La Guerra signed the California Constitution of 1849, when California first joined the Union.  Similar terms are found in the Diversity Clause at Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1.  Prior to the Civil War, there was only one (1) class of Citizens under American Law.  See the holding in Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), for definitive authority on this key point.

The second class originates in the 1866 Civil Rights Act, where the term “citizen of the United States” is used.  This Act was later codified at 42 U.S.C. 1983.  Notice the lower-case “c” in “citizen”.  The pertinent court cases have held that Congress thereby created a municipal franchise primarily for members of the Negro race, who were freed by President Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation (a war measure), and later by the Thirteenth Amendment banning slavery and involuntary servitude.  Compelling payment of a “tax” for which there is no liability statute is tantamount to involuntary servitude, and extortion.

Instead of using the unique term “federal citizen”, as found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, it is now clear that the Radical Republicans who sponsored the 1866 Civil Rights Act were attempting to confuse these two classes of citizens.  Then, they attempted to elevate this second class to constitutional status, by proposing a 14th amendment to the U.S. Constitution.  As we now know, that proposal was never ratified.  (See Answer to Question 6 above.)

Numerous court cases have struggled to clarify the important differences between the two classes.  One of the most definitive, and dispositive cases, is Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), which clearly held that federal citizens had no standing to sue under the Diversity Clause, because they were not even contemplated when Article III in the U.S. Constitution was first being drafted, circa 1787 A.D.

Another is Ex parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300 (1855) in which the California Supreme Court ruled that there was no such thing as a “citizen of the United States” (as of the year 1855 A.D.).  Only federal citizens have standing to invoke 42 U.S.C. 1983;  whereas State Citizens do not.  See Wadleigh v. Newhall, 136 F. 941 (C.C. Cal. 1905).

Many more cases can be cited to confirm the existence of two classes of citizens under American Law.  These cases are thoroughly documented in the book entitled “The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue” by Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S., now in its eleventh edition.  See also the pleadings in the case of USA v. Gilbertson, also in the Supreme Law Library.


11.     Can one be a State Citizen, without also being a federal citizen?

Answer:  Yes.  The 1866 Civil Rights Act was municipal law, confined to the District of Columbia and other limited areas where Congress is the “state” government with exclusive legislative jurisdiction there.  These areas are now identified as “the federal zone.”  (Think of it as the blue field on the American flag;  the stars on the flag are the 50 States.)  As such, the 1866 Civil Rights Act had no effect whatsoever upon the lawful status of State Citizens, then or now.

Several courts have already recognized our Right to be State Citizens without also becoming federal citizens.  For excellent examples, see State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380, 6 S. 602 (1889) and Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155, 48 S. 788, 791 (1909).  The Maine Supreme Court also clarified the issue by explaining our “Right of Election” or “freedom of choice,” namely, our freedom to choose between two different forms of government.  See 44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting.

Since the Guarantee Clause does not require the federal government to guarantee a Republican Form of Government to the federal zone, Congress is free to create a different form of government there, and so it has.  In his dissenting opinion in Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 at 380 (1901), Supreme Court Justice Harlan called it an absolute legislative democracy.

But, State Citizens are under no legal obligation to join or pledge any allegiance to that legislative democracy;  their allegiance is to one or more of the several States of the Union (i.e. the white stars on the American flag, not the blue field).


12.     Who was Frank Brushaber, and why was his U.S. Supreme Court case so important?

Answer:  Frank Brushaber was the Plaintiff in the case of Brushaber v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 240 U.S. 1 (1916), the first U.S. Supreme Court case to consider the so‑called 16th amendment.  Brushaber identified himself as a Citizen of New York State and a resident of the Borough of Brooklyn, in the city of New York, and nobody challenged that claim.

The Union Pacific Railroad Company was a federal corporation created by Act of Congress to build a railroad through Utah (from the Union to the Pacific), at a time when Utah was a federal Territory, i.e. inside the federal zone.

Brushaber’s attorney committed an error by arguing that the company had been chartered by the State of Utah, but Utah was not a State of the Union when Congress first created that corporation.

Brushaber had purchased stock issued by the company.  He then sued the company to recover taxes that Congress had imposed upon the dividends paid to its stockholders.  The U.S. Supreme Court ruled against Frank Brushaber, and upheld the tax as a lawful excise, or indirect tax.

The most interesting result of the Court’s ruling was a Treasury Decision (“T.D.”) that the U.S. Department of the Treasury later issued as a direct consequence of the high Court’s opinion.  In T.D. 2313, the U.S. Treasury Department expressly cited the Brushaber decision, and it identified Frank Brushaber as a “nonresident alien” and the Union Pacific Railroad Company as a “domestic corporation”.  This Treasury Decision has never been modified or repealed.

T.D. 2313 is crucial evidence proving that the income tax provisions of the IRC are municipal law, with no territorial jurisdiction inside the 50 States of the Union.  The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who approved T.D. 2313 had no authority to extend the holding in the Brushaber case to anyone or anything not a proper Party to that court action.

Thus, there is no escaping the conclusion that Frank Brushaber was the nonresident alien to which that Treasury Decision refers.  Accordingly, all State Citizens are nonresident aliens with respect to the municipal jurisdiction of Congress, i.e. the federal zone.


13.     What is a “Withholding agent”?

Answer:  (See Answer to Question 7 first.)  The term “Withholding agent” is legally defined at IRC section 7701(a)(16).  It is further defined by the statutes itemized in that section, e.g. IRC 1461 where liability for funds withheld is clearly assigned.  In plain English, a “withholding agent” is a person who is responsible for withholding taxes from a worker’s paycheck, and then paying those taxes into the Treasury of the United States, typically on a quarterly basis.  See IRC section 7809.

One cannot become a withholding agent unless workers first authorize taxes to be withheld from their paychecks.  This authorization is typically done when workers opt to execute a valid W‑4 “Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate.”  In plain English, by signing a W‑4 workers designate themselves as “employees” and certify they are allowing withholding to occur.

If workers do not execute a valid W‑4 form, a company’s payroll officer is not authorized to withhold any federal income taxes from their paychecks.  In other words, the payroll officer does not have “permission” or “power of attorney” to withhold taxes, until and unless workers authorize or “allow” that withholding ‑‑ by signing Form W‑4 knowingly, intentionally and voluntarily.

Pay particular attention to the term “Employee” in the title of this form.  A properly executed Form W‑4 creates the presumption that the workers wish to be treated as if they were “employees” of the federal government.  Obviously, for people who do not work for the federal government, such a presumption is a legal fiction, at best.


14.     What is a “Withholding Exemption Certificate”?

Answer:  A “Withholding Exemption Certificate” is an alternative to Form W‑4, authorized by IRC section 3402(n) and executed in lieu of Form W‑4.  Although section 3402(n) does authorize this Certificate, the IRS has never added a corresponding form to its forms catalog (see the IRS “Printed Products Catalog”).

In the absence of an official IRS form, workers can use the language of section 3402(n) to create their own Certificates.  In simple language, the worker certifies that s/he had no federal income tax liability last year, and anticipates no federal income tax liability during the current calendar year.  Because there are no liability statutes for workers in the private sector, this certification is easy to justify.

Many public and private institutions have created their own form for the Withholding Exemption Certificate, e.g. California Franchise Tax Board, and Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland.  This fact can be confirmed by using any search engine, e.g. google.com, to locate occurrences of the term “withholding exemption certificate” on the Internet.  This term occurs several times in IRC section 3402.


15.     What is “tax evasion” and who might be guilty of this crime?

Answer:  “Tax evasion” is the crime of evading a lawful tax.  In the context of federal income taxes, this crime can only be committed by persons who have a legal liability to pay, i.e. the withholding agent.  If one is not employed by the federal government, one is not subject to the Public Salary Tax Act unless one chooses to be treated “as if” one is a federal government “employee.”  This is typically done by executing a valid Form W‑4.

However, as discussed above, Form W‑4 is not mandatory for workers who are not “employed” by the federal government.  Corporations chartered by the 50 States of the Union are technically “foreign” corporations with respect to the IRC;  they are decidedly not the federal government, and should not be regarded “as if” they are the federal government, particularly when they were never created by any Act of Congress.

Moreover, the Indiana Supreme Court has ruled that Congress can only create a corporation in its capacity as the Legislature for the federal zone.  Such corporations are the only “domestic” corporations under the pertinent federal laws.  This writer’s essay entitled “A Cogent Summary of Federal Jurisdictions” clarifies this important distinction between “foreign” and “domestic” corporations in simple, straightforward language.

If Congress were authorized to create national corporations, such a questionable authority would invade States’ rights reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment, namely, the right to charter their own domestic corporations.  The repeal of Prohibition left the Tenth Amendment unqualified.  See the Constantine case supra.

For purposes of the IRC, the term “employer” refers only to federal government agencies, and an “employee” is a person who works for such an “employer”.


16.     Why does IRS Form 1040 not require a Notary Public to notarize a taxpayer’s signature?

Answer:  This question is one of the fastest ways to unravel the fraudulent nature of federal income taxes.  At 28 U.S.C. section 1746, Congress authorized written verifications to be executed under penalty of perjury without the need for a Notary Public, i.e. to witness one’s signature.

This statute identifies two different formats for such written verifications:  (1) those executed outside the “United States” and (2) those executed inside the “United States”.  These two formats correspond to sections 1746(1) and 1746(2), respectively.

What is extremely revealing in this statute is the format for verifications executed “outside the United States”.  In this latter format, the statute adds the qualifying phrase “under the laws of the United States of America”.

Clearly, the terms “United States” and “United States of America” are both used in this same statute.  They are not one and the same.  The former refers to the federal government -- in the U.S. Constitution and throughout most federal statutes.  The latter refers to the 50 States that are united by, and under, the U.S. Constitution.  28 U.S.C. 1746 is the only federal statute in all of Title 28 of the United States Code that utilizes the term “United States of America”, as such.

It is painfully if not immediately obvious, then, that verifications made under penalty of perjury are outside the “United States” (read “the federal zone”) if and when they are executed inside the 50 States of the Union (read “the State zone”).

Likewise, verifications made under penalty of perjury are outside the 50 States of the Union, if and when they are executed inside the “United States”.

The format for signatures on Form 1040 is the one for verifications made inside the United States (federal zone) and outside the United States of America (State zone).


17.     Does the term “United States” have multiple legal meanings and, if so, what are they?

Answer:  Yes.  The term has several meanings.  The term "United States" may be used in any one of several senses.  [1] It may be merely the name of a sovereign occupying the position analogous to that of other sovereigns in the family of nations.  [2] It may designate the territory over which the sovereignty of the United States extends, or [3] it may be the collective name of the States which are united by and under the Constitution.  See Hooven & Allison Co. v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 652 (1945) [bold emphasis, brackets and numbers added for clarity].

This is the very same definition that is found in Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition.  The second of these three meanings refers to the federal zone and to Congress only when it is legislating in its municipal capacity.  For example, Congress is legislating in its municipal capacity whenever it creates a federal corporation, like the United States Postal Service.

It is terribly revealing of the manifold frauds discussed in these Answers, that the definition of “United States” has now been removed from the Seventh Edition of Black’s Law Dictionary.


18.     Is the term “income” defined in the IRC and, if not, where is it defined?

Answer:  The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals has already ruled that the term “income” is not defined anywhere in the IRC:  “The general term ‘income’ is not defined in the Internal Revenue Code.”  U.S. v. Ballard, 535 F.2d 400, 404 (8th Circuit, 1976).

Moreover, in Mark Eisner v. Myrtle H. Macomber, 252 U.S. 189 (1920), the high Court told Congress it could not legislate any definition of “income” because that term was believed to be in the U.S. Constitution.  The Eisner case was predicated on the ratification of the 16th amendment, which would have introduced the term “income” into the U.S. Constitution for the very first time (but only if that amendment had been properly ratified).

In Merchant's Loan & Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509 (1921), the high Court defined “income” to mean the profit or gain derived from corporate activities.  In that instance, the tax is a lawful excise tax imposed upon the corporate privilege of limited liability, i.e. the liabilities of a corporation do not reach its officers, employees, directors or stockholders.


19.     What is municipal law, and are the IRC’s income tax provisions municipal law, or not?

Answer:  Yes.  The IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law.  Municipal law is law that is enacted to govern the internal affairs of a sovereign State;  in legal circles, it is also known as Private International Law.  Under American Law, it has a much wider meaning than the ordinances enacted by the governing body of a municipality, i.e. city council or county board of supervisors.  In fact, American legal encyclopedias define “municipal” to mean “internal”, and for this reason alone, the Internal Revenue Code is really a Municipal Revenue Code.

A mountain of additional evidence has now been assembled and published in the book “The Federal Zone” to prove that the IRC’s income tax provisions are municipal law.

One of the most famous pieces of evidence is a letter from a Connecticut Congresswoman, summarizing the advice of legal experts employed by the Congressional Research Service and the Legislative Counsel.  Their advice confirmed that the meaning of “State” at IRC section 3121(e) is restricted to the named territories and possessions of D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico.

In other words, the term “State” in that statute, and in all similar federal statutes, includes ONLY the places expressly named, and no more.


20.     What does it mean if my State is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes?

The general rule is that federal government powers must be expressed and enumerated.  For example, the U.S. Constitution is a grant of enumerated powers.  If a power is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, then Congress does not have any authority to exercise that power.  This rule is tersely expressed in the Ninth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights.

If California is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes, then those statutes have no force or effect within that State.  This is also true of all 50 States.

Strictly speaking, the omission or exclusion of anyone or any thing from a federal statute can be used to infer that the omission or exclusion was intentional by Congress.  In Latin, this is tersely stated as follows:  Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.  In English, this phrase is literally translated:  Inclusion of one thing is the exclusion of all other things [that are not mentioned].  This phrase can be found in any edition of Black’s Law Dictionary;  it is a maxim of statutory construction.

The many different definitions of the term “State” that are found in federal laws are intentionally written to appear as if they include the 50 States PLUS the other places mentioned.  As the legal experts in Congress have now confirmed, this is NOT the correct way to interpret, or to construct, these statutes.

If a place is not mentioned, every American may correctly infer that the omission of that place from a federal statute was an intentional act of Congress.  Whenever it wants to do so, Congress knows how to define the term “United States” to mean the 50 States of the Union.  See IRC section 4612(a)(4)(A).


21.     In what other ways is the IRC deliberately vague, and what are the real implications for the average American?

There are numerous other ways in which the IRC is deliberately vague.  The absence of any legal definition for the term “income” is a classic deception.  The IRS enforces the Code as a tax on everything that “comes in,” but nothing could be further from the truth.  “Income” is decidedly NOT everything that “comes in.”

More importantly, the fact that this vagueness is deliberate is sufficient grounds for concluding that the entire Code is null, void and unconstitutional, for violating our fundamental Right to know the nature and cause of any accusation, as guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment in the Bill of Rights.

Whether the vagueness is deliberate or not, any statute is unconstitutionally void if it is vague.  If a statute is void for vagueness, the situation is the same as if it had never been enacted at all, and for this reason it can be ignored entirely.


22.     Has Title 26 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) ever been enacted into positive law, and what are the legal implications if Title 26 has not been enacted into positive law?

Answer:  No.  Another, less obvious case of deliberate deception is the statute at IRC section 7851(a)(6)(A), where it states that the provisions of subtitle F shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment of “this title”.  Because the term “this title” is not defined anywhere in 26 U.S.C., least of all in the section dedicated to definitions, one is forced to look elsewhere for its meaning, or to derive its meaning from context.

Throughout Title 28 of the United States Code -- the laws which govern all the federal courts -- the term “this title” clearly refers to Title 28.  This fact would tend to support a conclusion that “this title”, as that term is used in the IRC, refers to Title 26 of the United States Code.  However, Title 26 has never been enacted into positive law, as such.

Even though all federal judges may know the secret meaning of “this title”, they are men and women of UNcommon intelligence.  The U.S. Supreme Court’s test for vagueness is violated whenever men and women of common intelligence must necessarily guess at the meaning and differ as to the application of a vague statute.  See Connally et al. v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).  Thus, federal judges are applying the wrong test for vagueness.

Accordingly, the provisions of subtitle F have never taken effect.  (“F” is for enForcement!)  This subtitle contains all of the enforcement statutes of the IRC, e.g. filing requirements, penalties for failure to file and tax evasion, grants of court jurisdiction over liens, levies and seizures, summons enforcement and so on.

In other words, the IRC is a big pile of Code without any teeth;  as such, it can impose no legal obligations upon anyone, not even people with dentures!


23.     What federal courts are authorized to prosecute income tax crimes?

This question must be addressed in view of the Answer to Question 22 above.  Although it may appear that certain statutes in the IRC grant original jurisdiction to federal district courts, to institute prosecutions of income tax crimes, none of the statutes found in subtitle F has ever taken effect.  For this reason, those statutes do not authorize the federal courts to do anything at all.  As always, appearances can be very deceiving.  Remember the Wizard of Oz or the mad tea party of Alice in Wonderland?

On the other hand, the federal criminal Code at Title 18, U.S.C., does grant general authority to the District Courts of the United States (“DCUS”) to prosecute violations of the statutes found in that Code.  See 18 U.S.C. 3231.

It is very important to appreciate the fact that these courts are not the same as the United States District Courts (“USDC”).  The DCUS are constitutional courts that originate in Article III of the U.S. Constitution.  The USDC are territorial tribunals, or legislative courts, that originate in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Territory Clause.

This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Eighth Circuit on behalf of the Defendant in USA v. Gilbertson cites numerous court cases that have already clarified the all important distinction between these two classes of federal district courts.  For example, in Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 at 312 (1922), the high Court held that the USDC belongs in the federal Territories.  This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Ninth Circuit in Mitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. develops this theme in even greater detail;  begin reading at section “7(e)”.

The USDC, as such, appear to lack any lawful authorities to prosecute income tax crimes.  The USDC are legislative tribunals where summary proceedings dominate.

For example, under the federal statute at 28 U.S.C. 1292, the U.S. Courts of Appeal have no appellate jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders issued by the USDC.  Further details on this point are available in the Press Release entitled “Private Attorney General Cracks Title 28 of the United States Code” and dated November 26, 2001 A.D.


24.     Are federal judges required to pay income taxes on their pay, and what are the real implications if they do pay taxes on their pay?

Answer:  No.  Federal judges who are appointed to preside on the District Courts of the United States –- the Article III constitutional courts –- are immune from any taxation of their pay, by constitutional mandate.

The fact that all federal judges are currently paying taxes on their pay is proof of undue influence by the IRS, posing as a duly authorized agency of the Executive Branch.  See Evans v. Gore, 253 U.S. 245 (1920).

Even if the IRS were a lawful bureau or department within the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are NOT), the existence of undue influence by the Executive Branch would violate the fundamental principle of Separation of Powers.  This principle, in theory, keeps the 3 branches of the federal government confined to their respective areas, and prevents any one branch from usurping the lawful powers that rightly belong to the other two branches.

The Separation of Powers principle is succinctly defined in Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933);  however, in that decision the Supreme Court erred by defining “Party” to mean only Plaintiffs in Article III, contrary to the definition of “Party” that is found in Bouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856).

The federal judiciary, contemplated by the organic U.S. Constitution, was intended to be independent and unbiased.  These two qualities are the essence, or sine qua non of judicial power, i.e. without which there is nothing.  Undue influence obviously violates these two qualities.  See Evans v. Gore supra.

In Lord v. Kelley, 240 F.Supp. 167, 169 (1965), the federal judge in that case was honest enough to admit, in his published opinion, that federal judges routinely rule in favor of the IRS, because they fear the retaliation that might result from ruling against the IRS.  There you have it, from the horse’s mouth!

In front of a class of law students at the University of Arizona in January of 1997, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist openly admitted that all federal judges are currently paying taxes on their judicial pay.  This writer was an eyewitness to that statement by the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court -– the highest Court in the land.

Thus, all federal judges are now material witnesses to the practice of concealing the Withholding Exemption Certificate from them, when they were first hired as “employees” of the federal judiciary.  As material witnesses, they are thereby disqualified from presiding on all federal income tax cases.


25.     Can federal grand juries issue valid indictments against illegal tax protesters?

Answer:  No.  Federal grand juries cannot issue valid indictments against illegal tax protesters.  Protest has never been illegal in America, because the First Amendment guarantees our fundamental Right to express our objections to any government actions, in written and in spoken words.

Strictly speaking, the term “illegal” cannot modify the noun “protesters” because to do so would constitute a violation of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights, one of the most magnificent constitutional provisions ever written.

Accordingly, for the term “illegal tax protester” to survive this obvious constitutional challenge, the term “illegal” must modify the noun “tax”.  An illegal tax protester is, therefore, someone who is protesting an illegal tax.  Such an act of protest is protected by the First Amendment, and cannot be a crime.

Protest is also recognized and honored by the Uniform Commercial Code;  the phrases “under protest” and “without prejudice” are sufficient to reserve all of one’s fundamental Rights at law.  See U.C.C. 1-308 (UCCA 1308 in California).

By the way, the federal U.C.C. is also municipal law.  See the Answer to Question 19 above, and 77 Stat. 630, P.L. 88‑243, December 30, 1963 (one month after President John F. Kennedy was murdered).


26.     Do IRS agents ever tamper with federal grand juries, and how is this routinely done?

Answer:  Yes.  IRS agents routinely tamper with federal grand juries, most often by misrepresenting themselves, under oath, as lawful employees and “Special Agents” of the federal government, and by misrepresenting the provisions of subtitle F as having any legal force or effect.  Such false representations of fact violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1125(a).  (Title 15 of the United States Code has not been enacted into positive law either.)

They tamper with grand juries by acting as if “income” is everything that “comes in”, when there is no such definition anywhere in the IRC.  Such false descriptions of fact also violate Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act.

They tamper with grand juries by presenting documentary evidence which they had no authority to acquire, in the first instance, such as bank records.  Bank signature cards do not constitute competent waivers of their customers’ fundamental Rights to privacy, as secured by the Fourth Amendment.  The high standard for waivers of fundamental Rights was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brady v. U.S., 397 U.S. 742, 748 (1970).

IRS agents tamper with grand juries by creating and maintaining the false and fraudulent pretenses that the IRC is not vague, or that the income tax provisions have any legal force or effect inside the 50 States of the Union, when those provisions do not.

These are all forms of perjury, as well, and possibly also misprision of perjury by omission, i.e. serious federal offenses.

Finally, there is ample evidence that IRS agents bribe U.S. Attorneys, federal judges, and even the Office of the President with huge kickbacks, every time a criminal indictment is issued by a federal grand jury against an illegal tax protester.  (See the Answer to Question 25 above.)  These kick‑backs range from $25,000 to $35,000 in CASH!  They also violate the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986, which penalizes the payment of kickbacks from federal government subcontractors.  See 41 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.

As a trust domiciled in Puerto Rico, the IRS is, without a doubt, a federal government subcontractor that is subject to this Act.  See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62).  The systematic and premeditated pattern of racketeering by IRS employees also establishes probable cause to dismantle the IRS permanently for violating the Sherman Antitrust Act, first enacted in the year 1890 A.D.  See 26 Stat. 209 (1890) (uncodified at 15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.)


27.     What is “The Kickback Racket,” and where can I find evidence of its existence?

The evidence of this “kickback racket” was first discovered in a table of delegation orders, on a page within the Internal Revenue Manual (“IRM”) -- the internal policy and procedure manual for all IRS employees.

Subsequently, this writer submitted a lawful request, under the Freedom of Information Act, for a certified list of all payments that had ever been made under color of these delegation orders in the IRM.  Mr. Mark L. Zolton, a tax law specialist within the Internal Revenue Service, responded on IRS letterhead, transmitted via U.S. Mail, that few records existed for these “awards” because most of them were paid in cash!

When this evidence was properly presented to a federal judge, who had been asked to enforce a federal grand jury subpoena against a small business in Arizona, he ended up obstructing all 28 pieces of U.S. Mail we had transmitted to that grand jury.

Obstruction of correspondence is a serious federal offense, and federal judges have no authority whatsoever to intercept U.S. Mail.  See 18 U.S.C. 1702.

Obviously, the federal judge -- John M. Roll -- did NOT want the grand jury in that case to know anything about these kickbacks.  They found out anyway, because of the manner in which this writer defended that small business, as its Vice President for Legal Affairs.


28.     Can the IRS levy bank accounts without a valid court order?

Answer:  No.  The Fifth Amendment prohibits all deprivations of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.  Due Process of Law is another honored and well developed feature of American constitutional practice.  Put simply, it requires Notice and Hearing before any property can be seized by any federal government employees, agents, departments or agencies.

A levy against a bank account is a forced seizure of property, i.e. the funds on deposit in that account.  No such seizure can occur unless due process of law has first run its course.  This means notice, hearing, and deliberate adjudication of all the pertinent issues of law and fact.

Only after this process has run its proper or “due” course, can a valid court order be issued.  The holding in U.S. v. O’Dell, 160 F.2d 304 (6th Cir. 1947), makes it very clear that the IRS can only levy a bank account after first obtaining a Warrant of Distraint, or court ORDER.  And, of course, no court ORDER could ever be obtained unless all affected Parties had first enjoyed their “day in court.”


29.     Do federal income tax revenues pay for any government services and, if so, which government services are funded by federal income taxes?

Answer:  No.  The money trail is very difficult to follow, in this instance, because the IRS is technically a trust with a domicile in Puerto Rico.  See 31 U.S.C. 1321(a)(62).  As such, their records are protected by laws which guarantee the privacy of trust records within that territorial jurisdiction, provided that the trust is not also violating the Sherman Antitrust Act.

They are technically not an “agency” of the federal government, as that term is defined in the Freedom of Information Act and in the Administrative Procedures Act.  The governments of the federal territories are expressly excluded from the definition of “agency” in those Acts of Congress.  See 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).  (See also the Answer to Question 5 above.)

All evidence indicates that they are a money laundry, extortion racket, and conspiracy to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1951 and 1961 et seq.

They appear to be laundering huge sums of money into foreign banks, mostly in Europe, and quite possibly into the Vatican.  See the national policy on money laundering at 31 U.S.C. 5341.

The final report of the Grace Commission, convened under President Ronald Reagan, quietly admitted that none of the funds they collect from federal income taxes goes to pay for any federal government services.  The Grace Commission found that those funds were being used to pay for interest on the federal debt, and income transfer payments to beneficiaries of entitlement programs like federal pension plans.


30.     How can the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) help me to answer other key tax questions?

The availability of correct information about federal government operations is fundamental to maintaining the freedom of the American People.  The Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), at 5 U.S.C. 552 et seq., was intended to make government documents available with a minimal amount of effort by the People.

As long as a document is not protected by one of the reasonable exemptions itemized in the FOIA, a requester need only submit a brief letter to the agency having custody of the requested document(s).  If the requested document is not produced within 20 working days (excluding weekends and federal holidays), the requester need only prepare a single appeal letter.

If the requested document is not produced within another 20 working days after the date of the appeal letter, the requester is automatically allowed to petition a District Court of the United States (Article III DCUS, not the Article IV USDC) -- to compel production of the requested document, and judicially to enjoin the improper withholding of same.  See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(B).  The general rule is that statutes conferring original jurisdiction on federal district courts must be strictly construed.

This writer has pioneered the application of the FOIA to request certified copies of statutes and regulations which should exist, but do not exist.  A typical request anyone can make, to which the U.S. Treasury has now fallen totally silent, is for a certified copy of all statutes which create a specific liability for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the IRC.  For example, see the FOIA request that this writer prepared for author Lynne Meredith.

Of course, by now we already know the answer to this question, before asking it.  (Good lawyers always know the answers to their questions, before asking them.)

It should also be clear that such a FOIA request should not be directed to the IRS, because they are not an “agency” as that term is defined at 5 U.S.C. 551(1)(C).  Address it instead to the Disclosure Officer, Disclosure Services, Room 1054-MT, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington 20220, District of Columbia, USA.  This is the format for “foreign” addresses, as explained in USPS Publication #221.

As James Madison once wrote, “A popular government without popular information or the means of acquiring it, is but a Prologue to a Farce or a Tragedy or perhaps both.  Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own Governors, must arm themselves with the power knowledge gives."